Pub Date : 2026-02-20DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.228
Silvia Salvatori, Chiara Venuto, Diana Giannarelli, Elena De Cristofaro, Rocco Spagnuolo, Federico Carrabetta, Paola Balestrieri, Francesca Baldaro, Irene Mignini, Gabriele Rumi, Diletta Immacolata Lavigna, Valentin Calvez, Franco Scaldaferri, Francesco Luzza, Michele Cicala, David Della-Morte, Emma Calabrese, Giovanni Monteleone, Irene Marafini
Background: Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome associated with poor outcomes and increased vulnerability, yet its assessment in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remains challenging due to the absence of disease-specific tools.
Aims: This study aimed to develop and validate the IBD Frailty Score, a tailored instrument for evaluating frailty in patients with Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).
Methods: In the development phase, 28 categorical items were included in the IBD Frailty Score. This tool was tested in an exploratory cohort of 121 IBD outpatients and later validated in a prospective multicenter cohort of 512 patients across four tertiary centers. Predictive factors of frailty were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: The IBD Frailty Score was feasible, with an average administration time of ∼2 minutes. It correlated positively with the Fried Frailty Phenotype, IBD Disability Index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index and showed good reproducibility (rho = 0.78) and strong diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.79). A cut-off score of 4 reliably distinguished fit from frail patients. Increasing age, polypharmacy, history of extraintestinal manifestations, and higher disease activity were independent risk factors for frailty.
Conclusions: The IBD Frailty Score is the first validated, disease-specific tool for assessing frailty in IBD. It is practical, reproducible, and correlates well with established measures.
{"title":"Development and validation of the IBD frailty score in a multicenter prospective cohort of IBD outpatients.","authors":"Silvia Salvatori, Chiara Venuto, Diana Giannarelli, Elena De Cristofaro, Rocco Spagnuolo, Federico Carrabetta, Paola Balestrieri, Francesca Baldaro, Irene Mignini, Gabriele Rumi, Diletta Immacolata Lavigna, Valentin Calvez, Franco Scaldaferri, Francesco Luzza, Michele Cicala, David Della-Morte, Emma Calabrese, Giovanni Monteleone, Irene Marafini","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.228","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.228","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome associated with poor outcomes and increased vulnerability, yet its assessment in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remains challenging due to the absence of disease-specific tools.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate the IBD Frailty Score, a tailored instrument for evaluating frailty in patients with Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the development phase, 28 categorical items were included in the IBD Frailty Score. This tool was tested in an exploratory cohort of 121 IBD outpatients and later validated in a prospective multicenter cohort of 512 patients across four tertiary centers. Predictive factors of frailty were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IBD Frailty Score was feasible, with an average administration time of ∼2 minutes. It correlated positively with the Fried Frailty Phenotype, IBD Disability Index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index and showed good reproducibility (rho = 0.78) and strong diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.79). A cut-off score of 4 reliably distinguished fit from frail patients. Increasing age, polypharmacy, history of extraintestinal manifestations, and higher disease activity were independent risk factors for frailty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IBD Frailty Score is the first validated, disease-specific tool for assessing frailty in IBD. It is practical, reproducible, and correlates well with established measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146775951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-19DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2026.02.004
Lihu Gu, Xiaoming Zhang, Shengqiang Ji, Yihang Pan, Yi Shen, Moucheng Zhang, Qingping Wu, Weiming Yu, Feng Wu, Qi Zheng
Background: Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) and gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED) are rare and highly aggressive subtypes of gastric cancer (GC).
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic outcomes of patients with HAS and GAED.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study compared 107 patients with HAS/GAED with 428 patients with conventional GC (cGC) after 4:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), gastric cancer-specific survival (GCSS), and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves.
Results: With a median follow-up of 33 months, patients in the HAS/GAED group, compared with those in the cGC group, exhibited larger tumor size, poorer histological differentiation, higher preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and a higher rate of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified elevated CEA levels, perineural invasion (PNI), and pathological N (pN) category as independent risk factors for poor prognosis, whereas postoperative chemotherapy was identified as a protective factor. The HAS/GAED group demonstrated significantly worse DFS (P<0.001), GCSS (P=0.001), and OS (P=0.028) compared with the cGC group. No significant prognostic differences were observed between patients with HAS and those with GAED.
Conclusion: HAS and GAED are highly aggressive subtypes of GC, characterized by distinct clinicopathological features and an unfavorable prognosis.
{"title":"Clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with resectable HAS/GAED: A multicenter nested case-control study from China.","authors":"Lihu Gu, Xiaoming Zhang, Shengqiang Ji, Yihang Pan, Yi Shen, Moucheng Zhang, Qingping Wu, Weiming Yu, Feng Wu, Qi Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.02.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2026.02.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) and gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED) are rare and highly aggressive subtypes of gastric cancer (GC).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic outcomes of patients with HAS and GAED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study compared 107 patients with HAS/GAED with 428 patients with conventional GC (cGC) after 4:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), gastric cancer-specific survival (GCSS), and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a median follow-up of 33 months, patients in the HAS/GAED group, compared with those in the cGC group, exhibited larger tumor size, poorer histological differentiation, higher preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and a higher rate of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified elevated CEA levels, perineural invasion (PNI), and pathological N (pN) category as independent risk factors for poor prognosis, whereas postoperative chemotherapy was identified as a protective factor. The HAS/GAED group demonstrated significantly worse DFS (P<0.001), GCSS (P=0.001), and OS (P=0.028) compared with the cGC group. No significant prognostic differences were observed between patients with HAS and those with GAED.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HAS and GAED are highly aggressive subtypes of GC, characterized by distinct clinicopathological features and an unfavorable prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background & aims: A significant subset of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) who do not present with organ failure (OF) at admission nonetheless progress to severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). We aimed to develop and validate a simple scoring system to predict progression to SAP specifically in AP patients without initial OF.
Methods: This study utilized a prospectively maintained AP database. Patients admitted without OF were included. Variable selection employed multivariable logistic regression, Boruta algorithm, and LASSO regression. A nomogram was developed, from which a simplified ACR score was derived.
Results: Of 3,813 eligible AP patients without OF at admission, 458 (12.0%) progressed to SAP. Six variables were independently associated with SAP progression. The resulting nomogram demonstrated strong discrimination, with AUCs of 0.834 (training), 0.833 (internal test), and 0.885 (external validation). The simplified ACR score (range 0-9) showed comparable performance (AUC 0.827, 95% CI: 0.807-0.846) and was significantly superior to APACHE II (AUC 0.655, p < 0.001), SIRS (AUC 0.732, p < 0.001) and BISAP (AUC 0.718, p < 0.001). Stratification into low- (0-3 points), intermediate- (4-6 points), and high-risk (7-9 points) groups revealed sharply increasing SAP incidence (2.9%, 16.5%, and 52.1%, respectively; p < 0.001) and worsening clinical outcomes.
Conclusions: The ACR score, comprising six readily available clinical parameters, effectively stratifies the risk of SAP progression in AP patients without organ failure at admission.
背景与目的:急性胰腺炎(AP)患者中有很大一部分在入院时没有出现器官衰竭(of),但进展为严重急性胰腺炎(SAP)。我们的目标是开发和验证一个简单的评分系统,以预测没有初始OF的AP患者的SAP进展。方法:本研究利用前瞻性维护的AP数据库。没有OF的住院患者也包括在内。变量选择采用多变量logistic回归、Boruta算法和LASSO回归。开发了一个nomogram,并由此导出了一个简化的ACR评分。结果:3813例入院时无Of的AP患者中,458例(12.0%)进展为SAP。6个变量与SAP进展独立相关。结果显示出很强的判别性,auc分别为0.834(训练)、0.833(内部检验)和0.885(外部验证)。简化ACR评分(范围0-9)表现出相当的性能(AUC 0.827, 95% CI: 0.807-0.846),显著优于APACHE II (AUC 0.655, p < 0.001)、SIRS (AUC 0.732, p < 0.001)和BISAP (AUC 0.718, p < 0.001)。按低(0-3分)、中(4-6分)和高危(7-9分)分组,SAP发病率急剧增加(分别为2.9%、16.5%和52.1%,p < 0.001),临床预后恶化。结论:ACR评分,包括6个容易获得的临床参数,有效地分层入院时没有器官衰竭的AP患者SAP进展的风险。
{"title":"Predictive model for progression to severe acute pancreatitis in patients without organ failure at admission.","authors":"Jianhua Wan, Yaoyu Zou, Maobin Kuang, Shixuan Xiong, Huajing Ke, Jiabao Jin, Wenhua He, Yin Zhu, Nonghua Lu, Liang Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.02.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2026.02.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>A significant subset of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) who do not present with organ failure (OF) at admission nonetheless progress to severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). We aimed to develop and validate a simple scoring system to predict progression to SAP specifically in AP patients without initial OF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized a prospectively maintained AP database. Patients admitted without OF were included. Variable selection employed multivariable logistic regression, Boruta algorithm, and LASSO regression. A nomogram was developed, from which a simplified ACR score was derived.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,813 eligible AP patients without OF at admission, 458 (12.0%) progressed to SAP. Six variables were independently associated with SAP progression. The resulting nomogram demonstrated strong discrimination, with AUCs of 0.834 (training), 0.833 (internal test), and 0.885 (external validation). The simplified ACR score (range 0-9) showed comparable performance (AUC 0.827, 95% CI: 0.807-0.846) and was significantly superior to APACHE II (AUC 0.655, p < 0.001), SIRS (AUC 0.732, p < 0.001) and BISAP (AUC 0.718, p < 0.001). Stratification into low- (0-3 points), intermediate- (4-6 points), and high-risk (7-9 points) groups revealed sharply increasing SAP incidence (2.9%, 16.5%, and 52.1%, respectively; p < 0.001) and worsening clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ACR score, comprising six readily available clinical parameters, effectively stratifies the risk of SAP progression in AP patients without organ failure at admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146225889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rapidly progressive and life-threatening condition that requires accurate risk stratification. Existing prognostic tools have limited sensitivity and generalizability. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a machine learning-based modeling framework for early in-hospital dynamic prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute liver failure.
Methods: Patients with ALF were identified from the MIMIC-IV database, with an independent external cohort from Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital for validation. Eleven predictors were selected using LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm. Seven ML models were trained and optimized through cross-validation and grid search. Model performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis, with interpretability evaluated by SHAP.
Results: A total of 1,228 patients from MIMIC-IV and 108 external patients were included. Among all evaluated models, logistic regression demonstrated the most robust and stable performance, with AUCs of 0.802 in internal validation and 0.774 in external validation. Calibration and decision curve analyses demonstrated good clinical utility. SHAP identified temperature, vasopressor use, age, CRRT, and sedative/analgesic use as key predictors. A nomogram and online tool were developed for individualized risk prediction.
Conclusion: This study presents an interpretable and externally validated ML model for predicting in-hospital mortality in ALF, providing a practical tool for early in-hospital dynamic risk stratification and clinical decision support.
{"title":"Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality in acute liver failure.","authors":"Xuanlin Wu, Qingzhou Song, Delin Li, Zixuan Liu, Xinyu Wang, Ruiwei Yang, Yukun He, Huawei Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.226","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rapidly progressive and life-threatening condition that requires accurate risk stratification. Existing prognostic tools have limited sensitivity and generalizability. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a machine learning-based modeling framework for early in-hospital dynamic prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute liver failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ALF were identified from the MIMIC-IV database, with an independent external cohort from Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital for validation. Eleven predictors were selected using LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm. Seven ML models were trained and optimized through cross-validation and grid search. Model performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis, with interpretability evaluated by SHAP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,228 patients from MIMIC-IV and 108 external patients were included. Among all evaluated models, logistic regression demonstrated the most robust and stable performance, with AUCs of 0.802 in internal validation and 0.774 in external validation. Calibration and decision curve analyses demonstrated good clinical utility. SHAP identified temperature, vasopressor use, age, CRRT, and sedative/analgesic use as key predictors. A nomogram and online tool were developed for individualized risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents an interpretable and externally validated ML model for predicting in-hospital mortality in ALF, providing a practical tool for early in-hospital dynamic risk stratification and clinical decision support.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146200380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-14DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.229
Hui Chen, Jun Wang, Caixia Fan, Kun Zhuang, Lili Yuan, Hong Li, Yujie Jing, Nian Fang, Jiaqiang Dong, Ying Han, Zhiguo Liu
Background and aim: The benefit of combining linaclotide with polyethylene glycol (PEG) for improving bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection in patients at risk for inadequate bowel preparation remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety.
Methods: From August 2022 to July 2023, a multicenter, randomized trial assigned participants to a 2-day linaclotide or placebo plus PEG regimen. The primary endpoints included adequate bowel preparation rate and mean number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy.
Results: The modified intention-to-treat (mITT) (n=672) and per-protocol (n=574) analyses showed no significant differences in adequate bowel preparation rates (mITT: OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.73-2.16, P=0.406; per-protocol: OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.80-2.66, P=0.222) or the mean number of adenomas (mITT: mean difference -0.02, 95% CI -0.19-0.15, P=0.832; per-protocol: mean difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.25-0.13, P=0.530) between groups. However, linaclotide and PEG increased the mean number of polyps in the right colon (0.54 ± 1.9 vs. 0.27 ± 0.8; mean difference -0.27, 95% CI -0.49- -0.05, P=0.016), particularly in patients aged ≥70 years (mean difference -1.30, 95% CI -2.48- -0.13, P=0.033).
Conclusions: A 2-day linaclotide regimen failed to improve the primary endpoints of bowel preparation adequacy or adenoma detection in high-risk patients.
背景和目的:利那洛肽联合聚乙二醇(PEG)改善肠准备质量和肠准备不充分患者腺瘤检测的益处尚不确定。本研究旨在评价其有效性和安全性。方法:从2022年8月到2023年7月,一项多中心随机试验将参与者分配到2天的利那洛肽或安慰剂加PEG方案。主要终点包括充分的肠道准备率和每次结肠镜检查检测到的腺瘤的平均数量。结果:改进的意向治疗(mITT) (n=672)和按方案(n=574)分析显示,两组之间在充分的肠道准备率(mITT: OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.73-2.16, P=0.406;按方案:OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.80-2.66, P=0.222)或腺瘤的平均数量(mITT:平均差值-0.02,95% CI -0.19-0.15, P=0.832;按方案:平均差值-0.06,95% CI -0.25-0.13, P=0.530)方面没有显著差异。然而,利那洛肽和PEG增加了右结肠息肉的平均数量(0.54±1.9比0.27±0.8;平均差值为-0.27,95% CI为-0.49- -0.05,P=0.016),特别是年龄≥70岁的患者(平均差值为-1.30,95% CI为-2.48- -0.13,P=0.033)。结论:2天的利那洛肽治疗方案未能改善高危患者肠道准备充分性或腺瘤检测的主要终点。
{"title":"Short-term linaclotide plus polyethylene glycol in patients at increased risk of inadequate bowel preparation: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial.","authors":"Hui Chen, Jun Wang, Caixia Fan, Kun Zhuang, Lili Yuan, Hong Li, Yujie Jing, Nian Fang, Jiaqiang Dong, Ying Han, Zhiguo Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.229","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The benefit of combining linaclotide with polyethylene glycol (PEG) for improving bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection in patients at risk for inadequate bowel preparation remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August 2022 to July 2023, a multicenter, randomized trial assigned participants to a 2-day linaclotide or placebo plus PEG regimen. The primary endpoints included adequate bowel preparation rate and mean number of adenomas detected per colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified intention-to-treat (mITT) (n=672) and per-protocol (n=574) analyses showed no significant differences in adequate bowel preparation rates (mITT: OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.73-2.16, P=0.406; per-protocol: OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.80-2.66, P=0.222) or the mean number of adenomas (mITT: mean difference -0.02, 95% CI -0.19-0.15, P=0.832; per-protocol: mean difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.25-0.13, P=0.530) between groups. However, linaclotide and PEG increased the mean number of polyps in the right colon (0.54 ± 1.9 vs. 0.27 ± 0.8; mean difference -0.27, 95% CI -0.49- -0.05, P=0.016), particularly in patients aged ≥70 years (mean difference -1.30, 95% CI -2.48- -0.13, P=0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 2-day linaclotide regimen failed to improve the primary endpoints of bowel preparation adequacy or adenoma detection in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146200382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-13DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.227
João Carlos Gonçalves, Ana Raquel Cruz, Sofia Xavier, Joana Magalhães, Carla Marinho, José Cotter
Background and aims: Cirrhosis progression from compensated to decompensated stage signals a deterioration in prognosis, with episodes of acute decompensation (AD) carrying a high risk of short-term mortality. Recently, the concept of non-acute decompensation (NAD) has emerged, representing a more insidious form of decompensation that is nonetheless associated with increased mortality. We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of NAD in a hospital-referred hepatology population.
Methods: Single-center, retrospective, longitudinal observational study which included adult patients with compensated cirrhosis followed between 2013-2025.
Results: Data from 391 patients were analyzed, 72.1% male with a mean age of 59.9±11 years. Of those, 215 did not decompensate (ND), 121 developed NAD and 55 developed AD. The baseline independent predictors of NAD included a higher MELD score, lower serum albumin and non-compliance with the effective etiological treatment. AD was predicted by lower serum albumin, lower platelet count and non-compliance with the effective etiological treatment. Mortality was significantly higher in NAD (HR 10.82; p<0.001) and AD (HR 21.47; p<0.001) when compared with ND.
Conclusions: Our data shows that both AD and NAD are independent predictors of mortality in cirrhosis, with the former associating more significantly than the latter. However, the occurrence of NAD, despite clinically silent, should be recognized as marker of poor prognosis.
{"title":"The impact of non-acute decompensation of cirrhosis on patient mortality.","authors":"João Carlos Gonçalves, Ana Raquel Cruz, Sofia Xavier, Joana Magalhães, Carla Marinho, José Cotter","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Cirrhosis progression from compensated to decompensated stage signals a deterioration in prognosis, with episodes of acute decompensation (AD) carrying a high risk of short-term mortality. Recently, the concept of non-acute decompensation (NAD) has emerged, representing a more insidious form of decompensation that is nonetheless associated with increased mortality. We aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of NAD in a hospital-referred hepatology population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, retrospective, longitudinal observational study which included adult patients with compensated cirrhosis followed between 2013-2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 391 patients were analyzed, 72.1% male with a mean age of 59.9±11 years. Of those, 215 did not decompensate (ND), 121 developed NAD and 55 developed AD. The baseline independent predictors of NAD included a higher MELD score, lower serum albumin and non-compliance with the effective etiological treatment. AD was predicted by lower serum albumin, lower platelet count and non-compliance with the effective etiological treatment. Mortality was significantly higher in NAD (HR 10.82; p<0.001) and AD (HR 21.47; p<0.001) when compared with ND.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data shows that both AD and NAD are independent predictors of mortality in cirrhosis, with the former associating more significantly than the latter. However, the occurrence of NAD, despite clinically silent, should be recognized as marker of poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146197417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-10DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.222
Xiangying Xie, Juan Su, Qian Zhou, Wei Wang, Ying Su, Ping An, Lili Zhang
Background: Depression and anxiety were not only common but also with serious consequence in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients. The current study endeavors to define distinct depression and anxiety profiles of IBD patients and identify central symptoms within different profiles to facilitate targeted interventions.
Methods: The research employed K-means Clustering to delineate the depression and anxiety profiles, followed by a repetition of the analysis using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA). Furthermore, network analysis was utilized to identify central symptoms within the various profiles.
Results: K‑means Clustering identified Cluster 1 (38.89%), Cluster 2 (45.33%) and Cluster 3 (15.78%), while LPA yielded the low-risk group (39.56%), the mild-risk group (44.22%) and the high-risk group (16.22%). A majority of patients in the three clusters were predominantly in a single LPA-derived patient class (96.1-99.0%). Network analysis revealed that connections within each symptom in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were stronger than those between symptoms. Furthermore, PHQ 6 ("guilt"), PHQ2 ("sad mood")and GAD 7 ("feeling afraid") were identified as the central symptoms in Cluster 1. PHQ2 ("sad mood"), GAD 3("excessive worry") and GAD 1 ("nervousness") emerged as the central symptoms in Cluster 2. Additionally, GAD3 ("excessive worry"), GAD 4 ("trouble relaxing") and GAD 6("irritability") were identified as the central symptoms in Cluster 3.
Conclusion: We defined three distinct depression and anxiety profiles among IBD patients and pinpointed central symptoms within each profile. These findings underscore the importance of directing research towards those central symptoms within each profile in order to develop targeted intervention strategies.
{"title":"Identifying central symptoms of depression and anxiety in different profiles of inflammatory bowel disease patients: A network analysis approach.","authors":"Xiangying Xie, Juan Su, Qian Zhou, Wei Wang, Ying Su, Ping An, Lili Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.222","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression and anxiety were not only common but also with serious consequence in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients. The current study endeavors to define distinct depression and anxiety profiles of IBD patients and identify central symptoms within different profiles to facilitate targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research employed K-means Clustering to delineate the depression and anxiety profiles, followed by a repetition of the analysis using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA). Furthermore, network analysis was utilized to identify central symptoms within the various profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>K‑means Clustering identified Cluster 1 (38.89%), Cluster 2 (45.33%) and Cluster 3 (15.78%), while LPA yielded the low-risk group (39.56%), the mild-risk group (44.22%) and the high-risk group (16.22%). A majority of patients in the three clusters were predominantly in a single LPA-derived patient class (96.1-99.0%). Network analysis revealed that connections within each symptom in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were stronger than those between symptoms. Furthermore, PHQ 6 (\"guilt\"), PHQ2 (\"sad mood\")and GAD 7 (\"feeling afraid\") were identified as the central symptoms in Cluster 1. PHQ2 (\"sad mood\"), GAD 3(\"excessive worry\") and GAD 1 (\"nervousness\") emerged as the central symptoms in Cluster 2. Additionally, GAD3 (\"excessive worry\"), GAD 4 (\"trouble relaxing\") and GAD 6(\"irritability\") were identified as the central symptoms in Cluster 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We defined three distinct depression and anxiety profiles among IBD patients and pinpointed central symptoms within each profile. These findings underscore the importance of directing research towards those central symptoms within each profile in order to develop targeted intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146164734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-04DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2025.12.021
Pedro Robson Costa Passos , Danilo Dias Avancini Viana , Gabriel Gomes de Araújo Chollet , Angel Evangelista Barroso Magalhães , Clebia Azevedo de Lima , Bartolomeu Alves Neto , Rodrigo Motta , Paulo Everton Garcia Costa , Elodie Bomfim Hyppolito , Gustavo Rego Coelho , José Huygens Parente Garcia
Background
Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) is a major concern, but it is unclear whether existing models can safely “rule out” patients from intensive imaging strategies.
Methods
We retrospectively studied 493 LT recipients transplanted for HCC (2002–2023). Competing-risk Fine–Gray regression with bootstrap stability selection was used to derive an illustrative score and compared with established models. Rule-out performance was evaluated by 5-year cumulative incidence. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and surveillance simulations quantified trade-offs between CT scans saved and recurrences missed under reduced protocols.
Results
Our model identified total tumor diameter, microvascular invasion, satellite nodules, and log(AFP) as stable predictors. DCA showed all models outperformed uniform surveillance only when 5-year recurrence exceeded 4%, with 7.5% as the upper acceptable threshold. Within this range, low-risk groups across models had 5-year recurrence risks of 2.5–5.7%. Reduced-intensity strategies could save 160–856 CTs per 100 patients while missing ≤1 recurrence with semiannual or annual two-year protocols. Cost–benefit analysis supported 4–7.5% as the optimal threshold. False negatives were uncommon (n = 13), with only two patients misclassified by all models.
Conclusions
Widely used models can identify patients suitable for reduced surveillance, though none delineated a true “no-screening” group.
{"title":"Defining safe thresholds for risk-adapted surveillance after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"Pedro Robson Costa Passos , Danilo Dias Avancini Viana , Gabriel Gomes de Araújo Chollet , Angel Evangelista Barroso Magalhães , Clebia Azevedo de Lima , Bartolomeu Alves Neto , Rodrigo Motta , Paulo Everton Garcia Costa , Elodie Bomfim Hyppolito , Gustavo Rego Coelho , José Huygens Parente Garcia","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2025.12.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dld.2025.12.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) is a major concern, but it is unclear whether existing models can safely “rule out” patients from intensive imaging strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively studied 493 LT recipients transplanted for HCC (2002–2023). Competing-risk Fine–Gray regression with bootstrap stability selection was used to derive an illustrative score and compared with established models. Rule-out performance was evaluated by 5-year cumulative incidence. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and surveillance simulations quantified trade-offs between CT scans saved and recurrences missed under reduced protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our model identified total tumor diameter, microvascular invasion, satellite nodules, and log(AFP) as stable predictors. DCA showed all models outperformed uniform surveillance only when 5-year recurrence exceeded 4%, with 7.5% as the upper acceptable threshold. Within this range, low-risk groups across models had 5-year recurrence risks of 2.5–5.7%. Reduced-intensity strategies could save 160–856 CTs per 100 patients while missing ≤1 recurrence with semiannual or annual two-year protocols. Cost–benefit analysis supported 4–7.5% as the optimal threshold. False negatives were uncommon (<em>n</em> = 13), with only two patients misclassified by all models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Widely used models can identify patients suitable for reduced surveillance, though none delineated a true “no-screening” group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":"58 2","pages":"Pages 258-264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background & Aims: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab represents the current standard first-line treatment for advanced HCC, although individual therapeutic response varies considerably and remains challenging to predict. We developed a multimodal artificial intelligence framework combining clinical data with computed tomography imaging to predict six-month progression-free survival in patients undergoing atezolizumab-bevacizumab therapy.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 62 patients with advanced HCC receiving first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab at a tertiary referral centre (University of Palermo, Italy). A deep learning architecture was developed, integrating a convolutional neural network for CT image analysis (arterial, venous, and delayed phases) with a multilayer perceptron for structured clinical variables. The model was trained to predict progression-free survival status at six months. Performance metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, balanced accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results were benchmarked against conventional logistic regression using clinical variables only.
Results: At a median follow-up of 15.9 months, median overall survival reached 24.3 months (95% CI: 15.9-38.0). Twenty-three patients (37.1%) experienced disease progression or death within six months. The multimodal model attained an AUC of 0.86, with accuracy of 80.1%, specificity 84.7%, sensitivity 68.9%, F1-score 67.0%, and balanced accuracy 76.8%. Conversely, traditional logistic regression produced an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54-0.78), with neoplastic portal vein invasion demonstrating a trend toward significance (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 0.98-7.92, p=0.053) in multivariable analysis.
Conclusions: A multimodal artificial intelligence approach combining CT imaging with clinical data shows promising performance in predicting early disease progression among HCC patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab. Although preliminary and requiring external validation, these results suggest that deep learning frameworks may improve risk stratification and facilitate personalized treatment decision-making in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
{"title":"Predicting early progression in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab: A multimodal deep learning approach","authors":"Ciro Celsa , Salvatore Contino , Roberto Cannella , Roberta Ciccia , Gaia Crescimanno , Luca Cruciata , Simona Restuccia , Gaetano Giusino , Guido Cusimano , Sofia Calascibetta , Alessio Quartararo , Giuseppe Cabibbo , Giansalvo Cirrincione , Roberto Pirrone , Calogero Cammà","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.057","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.057","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong>Background & Aims:</strong> Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab represents the current standard first-line treatment for advanced HCC, although individual therapeutic response varies considerably and remains challenging to predict. We developed a multimodal artificial intelligence framework combining clinical data with computed tomography imaging to predict six-month progression-free survival in patients undergoing atezolizumab-bevacizumab therapy.</div><div><strong>Methods:</strong> We conducted a retrospective analysis of 62 patients with advanced HCC receiving first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab at a tertiary referral centre (University of Palermo, Italy). A deep learning architecture was developed, integrating a convolutional neural network for CT image analysis (arterial, venous, and delayed phases) with a multilayer perceptron for structured clinical variables. The model was trained to predict progression-free survival status at six months. Performance metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, balanced accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results were benchmarked against conventional logistic regression using clinical variables only.</div><div><strong>Results:</strong> At a median follow-up of 15.9 months, median overall survival reached 24.3 months (95% CI: 15.9-38.0). Twenty-three patients (37.1%) experienced disease progression or death within six months. The multimodal model attained an AUC of 0.86, with accuracy of 80.1%, specificity 84.7%, sensitivity 68.9%, F1-score 67.0%, and balanced accuracy 76.8%. Conversely, traditional logistic regression produced an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.54-0.78), with neoplastic portal vein invasion demonstrating a trend toward significance (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 0.98-7.92, p=0.053) in multivariable analysis.</div><div><strong>Conclusions:</strong> A multimodal artificial intelligence approach combining CT imaging with clinical data shows promising performance in predicting early disease progression among HCC patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab. Although preliminary and requiring external validation, these results suggest that deep learning frameworks may improve risk stratification and facilitate personalized treatment decision-making in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages S31-S32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147419708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-03-10DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.095
Andrea Dalbeni , Alessandra Auriemma , Marco Vicardi , Maria Elena Bellucco , Chiara Mazzarelli , Federica Villa , Giulia Dispinzieri , Leonardo Antonio Natola , Caterina Soldà , Sara Lonardi , Luisa Foltran , Sara Torresan , Simone Rota , Tiziana Pressiani , Lorenza Rimassa , David Sacerdoti , Michele Milella
Given the complexity of managing unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), few Italian centres have implemented integrated multidisciplinary clinics (MDTc), where hepatologists and oncologists jointly assess patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether this model improves survival outcomes in patients treated with Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab (A+B).
Methods: In this multicentre retrospective study, 146 patients with cirrhosis and unresectable HCC treated with A+B were included. Based on the outpatient care model, centres were categorised into two groups: those with MDTc and those with standard oncology clinics, where hepatologists were consulted on demand. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes included disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR). An inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis was performed to adjust for baseline imbalances between groups.
Results: Seventy-seven patients (53%) were managed in MDTc settings, and 69 (47%) in oncology clinics. Mediantreatment duration was 6.0 months (IQR 2.0–11.0). Median OS did not significantly differ between groups [19.7 months (95%CI: 16.6–23.1) vs 13.4 months (95%CI: 10.7–19.5); p=0.07], whereas median PFS was significantly longer in the MDTc group [13.6 months (95%CI: 8.9–NA) vs 7.7 months (95%CI: 4.9–13.0); p=0.02]. While ORR was similar, DCR was higher in the MDTc group (70.1% vs 60.3%; p=0.05). Patients followed in MDTc remained on first-line therapy significantly longer [8 months (IQR 3–12) vs 4 months (IQR 1–8); p=0.009]. Although the overall treatment discontinuation rate did not differ between the two groups, liver-related events were more frequent and accounted for a greater proportion of discontinuations in oncology clinics (40.6% vs 10.4%; p=0.04). Furthermore, treatment duration was shorter in patients discontinuing A+B due to liver-related events than other causes [2.5 months (IQR 1.8–6.3) vs 7.1 months (IQR 3.9–11.2); p<0.001]. However, in the IPW analysis, the association between MDTc management and clinical outcomes was no longer significant.
Conclusions: In patients with unresectable HCC treated with A+B, MDTc management did not significantly improved OS, but was associated with better PFS and DCR. These benefits were likely driven by longer treatment duration and lower rates of liver-related decompensation, underscoring the value of integrated hepatologic-oncologic management in this complex population.
鉴于治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)的复杂性,很少有意大利中心实施整合多学科诊所(MDTc),由肝病学家和肿瘤学家共同评估患者。本研究旨在评估该模型是否能改善Atezolizumab和Bevacizumab (A+B)治疗的患者的生存结果。方法:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,纳入了146例肝硬化和不可切除的HCC患者,采用A+B治疗。根据门诊护理模式,中心被分为两组:有MDTc的中心和有标准肿瘤诊所的中心,后者根据需要咨询肝病学家。主要结局是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS);次要结局包括疾病控制率(DCR)和客观缓解率(ORR)。进行逆概率加权(IPW)分析以调整组间基线不平衡。结果:77例(53%)患者在MDTc环境中接受治疗,69例(47%)患者在肿瘤诊所接受治疗。中位治疗时间为6.0个月(IQR 2.0 ~ 11.0)。两组间中位OS无显著差异[19.7个月(95%CI: 16.6-23.1) vs 13.4个月(95%CI: 10.7-19.5);p=0.07],而MDTc组的中位PFS明显更长[13.6个月(95%CI: 8.9-NA) vs 7.7个月(95%CI: 4.9-13.0);p = 0.02)。虽然ORR相似,但MDTc组的DCR更高(70.1% vs 60.3%; p=0.05)。接受MDTc治疗的患者接受一线治疗的时间明显更长[8个月(IQR 3-12) vs 4个月(IQR 1-8);p = 0.009)。虽然两组的总体停药率没有差异,但肝脏相关事件更频繁,占肿瘤诊所停药的比例更大(40.6% vs 10.4%; p=0.04)。此外,由于肝脏相关事件而停用A+B的患者的治疗持续时间比其他原因短[2.5个月(IQR 1.8-6.3) vs 7.1个月(IQR 3.9-11.2);术中,0.001]。然而,在IPW分析中,MDTc管理与临床结果之间的关联不再显著。结论:在接受A+B治疗的不可切除HCC患者中,MDTc管理并没有显著改善OS,但与更好的PFS和DCR相关。这些益处可能是由较长的治疗持续时间和较低的肝脏相关失代偿率所驱动的,强调了在这一复杂人群中肝肿瘤学综合管理的价值。
{"title":"Multidisciplinary clinic approach improves immunotherapy treatment outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicentre retrospective study.","authors":"Andrea Dalbeni , Alessandra Auriemma , Marco Vicardi , Maria Elena Bellucco , Chiara Mazzarelli , Federica Villa , Giulia Dispinzieri , Leonardo Antonio Natola , Caterina Soldà , Sara Lonardi , Luisa Foltran , Sara Torresan , Simone Rota , Tiziana Pressiani , Lorenza Rimassa , David Sacerdoti , Michele Milella","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.095","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dld.2026.01.095","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the complexity of managing unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), few Italian centres have implemented integrated multidisciplinary clinics (MDTc), where hepatologists and oncologists jointly assess patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether this model improves survival outcomes in patients treated with Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab (A+B).</div><div><strong>Methods:</strong> In this multicentre retrospective study, 146 patients with cirrhosis and unresectable HCC treated with A+B were included. Based on the outpatient care model, centres were categorised into two groups: those with MDTc and those with standard oncology clinics, where hepatologists were consulted on demand. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes included disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR). An inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis was performed to adjust for baseline imbalances between groups.</div><div><strong>Results:</strong> Seventy-seven patients (53%) were managed in MDTc settings, and 69 (47%) in oncology clinics. Mediantreatment duration was 6.0 months (IQR 2.0–11.0). Median OS did not significantly differ between groups [19.7 months (95%CI: 16.6–23.1) vs 13.4 months (95%CI: 10.7–19.5); p=0.07], whereas median PFS was significantly longer in the MDTc group [13.6 months (95%CI: 8.9–NA) vs 7.7 months (95%CI: 4.9–13.0); p=0.02]. While ORR was similar, DCR was higher in the MDTc group (70.1% vs 60.3%; p=0.05). Patients followed in MDTc remained on first-line therapy significantly longer [8 months (IQR 3–12) vs 4 months (IQR 1–8); p=0.009]. Although the overall treatment discontinuation rate did not differ between the two groups, liver-related events were more frequent and accounted for a greater proportion of discontinuations in oncology clinics (40.6% vs 10.4%; p=0.04). Furthermore, treatment duration was shorter in patients discontinuing A+B due to liver-related events than other causes [2.5 months (IQR 1.8–6.3) vs 7.1 months (IQR 3.9–11.2); p<0.001]. However, in the IPW analysis, the association between MDTc management and clinical outcomes was no longer significant.</div><div><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In patients with unresectable HCC treated with A+B, MDTc management did not significantly improved OS, but was associated with better PFS and DCR. These benefits were likely driven by longer treatment duration and lower rates of liver-related decompensation, underscoring the value of integrated hepatologic-oncologic management in this complex population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages S55-S56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147419957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}