Drugs - Real World Outcomes最新文献

Background: Third-generation antiseizure medications, such as brivaracetam, are recognized for their superior safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profiles. However, their potential benefits are often limited in low-income populations because of challenges related to availability and affordability.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of brivaracetam for treating epilepsy in a low-income population, within a real-world setting.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included individuals with epilepsy from a low-income population in Bogotá, Colombia, who were treated with brivaracetam between January 2020 and July 2023. Effectiveness (mean seizure reduction and ≥ 50% seizure reduction) and safety (retention rate and adverse events) were evaluated.

Results: A total of 106 individuals were included, with a median age of 33 years (interquartile range: 24-44). Most had focal epilepsy with a median disease duration of 25.4 years (standard deviation: 13.6). The baseline seizure frequency was 4 seizures per month (interquartile range: 2-15) and individuals had previously received a mean of 4.4 (standard deviation: 1.8) antiseizure medications. The mean percentage seizure reduction at 3, 6, and 12 months was 55.3%, 66.9%, and 63.8%, respectively. Additionally, 60%, 63.8%, and 65.9% of individuals achieved a ≥ 50% seizure reduction at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Retention rate at 3 months was 89% (n = 95) and 18.7% (n = 20) reported adverse effects.

Conclusions: In a real-world setting, brivaracetam has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of epilepsy in individuals from a low-income population. This study suggests that people with epilepsy living in this context can significantly benefit from the use of third-generation antiseizure medications.

Background and objective: Dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab combined with taxane-based chemotherapy (Cht) has been the standard first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) for years, due to the impressive results of the CLEOPATRA study. Real-world (RW) studies have become critical for assessing treatment effectiveness and safety in real-life circumstances. The aim of this study was to analyze the treatment outcomes of first-line therapy for HER2-positive mBC in RW clinical practice, specifically focusing on the use of maintenance endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor positive (HR-positive) patients.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 106 HER2-positive mBC patients treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab combined with taxane-based Cht from October 2015 to December 2020 at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb.

Results: At a median follow-up of 30 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 25 months for the total population (95% confidence interval [CI] 16 - not analyzed). Patients with de novo mBC had longer median PFS than patients with recurrent disease (not reached vs. 18 months; hazard ratio 1.99; 95% CI 0.69-3.64, p<0.022). Age, hormone receptor positivity, visceral involvement, number of Cht cycles and previous adjuvant trastuzumab did not impact PFS. Most HR-positive patients (N=55, 88.7%) received maintenance ET after induction Cht.

Conclusion: This retrospective study provides additional data on patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes of RW HER2-positive mBC patients treated with pertuzumab and trastuzumab as first-line therapy. In our institution, maintenance ET after induction Cht has become standard clinical practice.

Background: Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have expanding indications, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are serious adverse events associated with their use. Moreover, their analysis using the Japanese database of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports has not yet been conducted.

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER) to evaluate the association between JAK inhibitors and DVT and PE.

Methods: JADER reports from April 2004 to October 2023 were analyzed. A classification of reports for the period covered was performed by drug, and an imbalance analysis was performed with oral JAK inhibitors as the target drug and DVT, PE, and "embolic and thrombotic events, venous" (Standardised MedDRA Query; SMQ) as the target adverse events. Reported odds ratios (ROR) and information components (IC) were calculated for signal detection.

Results: Overall, 6631 JAK inhibitor-related adverse events were reported, including 60 and 41 cases of DVT and PE, respectively. The ROR and IC of the JAK inhibitors for DVT were 2.52 (1.95-3.25) and 1.27 (0.41-2.13), while those of baricitinib for DVT were 4.37 (2.83-6.73) and 1.90 (0.47-3.33), respectively. ROR signals were detected for JAK inhibitors for PE and "embolic and thrombotic events, venous (SMQ)," overall and for several JAK inhibitors but none for IC.

Conclusions: Several JAK inhibitors are under postmarketing phase vigilance, and the number of reported adverse events is low. However, when administering these drugs, care should be taken to avoid the development of thromboembolism, considering the patient's background.

Background: Levetiracetam is an anti-seizure medication (ASM) with an established safety profile. However, a potential safety signal of hypokalemia following levetiracetam use was published in the World Health Organization newsletter.

Objective: To investigate the possible causal association between the use of levetiracetam and the development of hypokalemia.

Method: This was a new-user, active-comparator retrospective cohort study using Real-world Evidence Research Network data at the Saudi Food and Drug Authority from 2016 to 2022. Adults (≥ 18 years old) with an incident prescription for either levetiracetam or carbamazepine were followed for up to 6 months from the prescription date. Hypokalemia was ascertained by using diagnostic code (i.e., E87.6) or by serum potassium level below 3.5 mmol/L. A Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weight, was fitted to compare the hazard of hypokalemia between levetiracetam and carbamazepine exposed patients.

Results: A total of 8,982 patients entered the study cohort. The incidence rate of hypokalemia was 303 cases per 10,000 patient-years in the levetiracetam-exposed cohort compared to 57 cases per 10,000 patient-years among carbamazepine users. Compared to carbamazepine users, patients exposed to levetiracetam had an adjusted hazard ratio related to induced hypokalemia of 1.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-4.49). Results of sensitivity analyses were comparable to the main analysis.

Conclusion: The hazard ratio for hypokalemia with the use of levetiracetam versus carbamazepine was statistically comparable. However, the potential association between levetiracetam use and hypokalemia cannot be ruled out given the elevated hazard ratios from the main and sensitivity analyses. Further studies may provide a more precise assessment of this association.

Introduction: A new algorithm for causality assessment of drugs and fatal cerebral haemorrhage (ACAD-FCH) was published in 2021. However, its use in clinical practice has not been verified.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the practical value of the ACAD-FCH when applying information available in clinical practice.

Methods: The medical records of patients who died at the University of Tokyo Hospital in 2020 were reviewed, and cases with intracranial haemorrhage were selected. Two evaluators independently assessed these cases using three methods (the ACAD-FCH, Naranjo algorithm, and WHO-UMC scale). The number of 'Yes', 'No', and 'No information/Do not know' responses to each question by both evaluators were summed and compared. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated for each method using agreement rates and kappa coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Among 316 deaths, 24 cases with intracranial haemorrhage were evaluated. The proportion of ‛No information/Do not know' responses for each question was 35.6% (95% CI 31.4-40.6%) for the ACAD-FCH and 66.9% (95% CI 62.5-71.1%) for the Naranjo algorithm. The respective agreement rates and kappa coefficients were 0.917 (0.798-1.00) and 0.867 (0.675-1.00) for the ACAD-FCH, 0.708 (0.512-0.904) and 0.139 (-0.236 to 0.513) for the Naranjo algorithm, and 0.50 (0.284-0.716) and 0.326 (0.110-0.541) for the WHO-UMC scale, respectively.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest the utility of the ACAD-FCH when assessing death cases with intracranial haemorrhage. However, larger studies including intra-rater assessments are warranted for further validation of this algorithm.

Background and objective: Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia. We compared the effect of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), low-dose intravenous (IV) iron (LDI), and iron sucrose on total cost of care in patients with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) from a US health plan perspective.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective claims analysis using the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database. Patients with index (first) claims of FCM and LDI and a medical claim associated with IDA between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019 were included. Monthly total healthcare and inpatient and outpatient costs after receiving index IV iron for patients in the treatment cohorts were compared using a generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log-link.

Results: The overall study cohort included 37,655 FCM, 44,237 LDI, and 27,461 iron sucrose patients. Mean per-patient-per-month numbers of IV iron infusions for FCM, LDI, and iron sucrose were 0.20, 0.34, and 0.37, respectively. Compared with baseline, the FCM group had greater reductions in the number of hospital admissions and smaller increases in the number of outpatient visits in the 12 months post-IV iron therapy than LDI and iron sucrose, translating to significantly lower total healthcare cost (post-index adjusted cost ratio for total cost: 0.96 and 0.92, respectively; both P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Higher drug acquisition cost of FCM relative to LDI and iron sucrose was offset by significantly lower inpatient and outpatient costs in the 12 months post-IV iron therapy. These results support the economic value of FCM for patients with IDA receiving IV iron therapy.

Background and objectives: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was administered orally to manage mild to moderate symptoms of COVID-19 in adult patients. The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate the cost-effectiveness of prescribing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir within 5 days of a COVID-19 illness in order to avert hospitalization within a 30-day period in the Malaysia setting; (ii) determine how variations in pricing and hospitalization rates will affect the cost-effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

Methods: The 30-day hospitalization related to COVID-19 was determined using 1 to 1 propensity score-matched real-world data in Malaysia from 14 July 2022 to 14 November 2022. To determine the total per-person costs related to COVID-19, we added the cost of drug (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or control), clinic visits and inpatient care. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per hospitalization averted was calculated.

Results: Our cohort included 31,487 patients. The rate of hospitalization within 30 days was found to be 0.35% for the group treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and 0.52% for the control group. The nirmatrelvir/ritonavir group cost an additional MYR 1,625.72 (USD 358.88) per patient. This treatment also resulted in a reduction of 0.17% risk for hospitalization, which corresponded to an ICER of MYR 946,801.26 (USD 209,006.90) per hospitalization averted.

Conclusion: In Malaysia, where vaccination rates were high, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir has been shown to be beneficial in the outpatient treatment of adults with COVID-19 who have risk factors; however, it was only marginally cost effective against hospitalization for healthy adults during the Omicron period.

Background and objectives: Clozapine shows higher efficacy against treatment-resistant schizophrenia than other antipsychotics. This study aimed to investigate whether clozapine is associated with the risk of non-hematological malignant tumors, utilizing the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Report System (FAERS) database.

Methods: The records from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2012 were used for disproportionality analysis, and patients who developed non-hematological malignant tumors were identified by the Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Queries (SMQ).

Results: Of the 3,641,281 patients with 12,401,586 reports of adverse drug events, 151,904 reports belonged to non-hematological malignant tumors (SMQ). We identified 1668 reports of non-hematological malignant tumors (SMQ) in clozapine users, and the reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated to be 1.28 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-1.34). ROR (95% CI) for the relationship between clozapine and the risk of testis cancer was calculated as 10.94 (6.99-17.12), 9.87 (7.42-13.15) for gastrointestinal carcinoma, 7.48 (5.57-10.05) for metastatic lung cancer, 6.71 (4.52-9.97) for throat cancer, 6.12 (4.56-8.21) for metastases to the spine, 5.97 (5.30-6.72) for lung malignant neoplasm, 5.07 (3.69-6.95) for esophageal carcinoma, 1.88 (1.43-2.47) for colon cancer, and 1.65 (1.24-2.21) for metastases to the liver. Colon cancer, esophageal carcinoma, and throat cancer were predominantly reported in males, and metastases to the spine and liver were in females.

Conclusion: This study detected signals indicating a relationship between clozapine and certain non-hematological malignant tumors, utilizing the FAERS database. Despite the database relying on spontaneous reporting, the current results justify further investigation.

Introduction: Statins and fibrates are important means of preventing cardiovascular diseases, particularly when administered in combination as part of various therapeutic strategies. In this study, we explored the risks associated with various combinations of these drugs.

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the risk of 1-year hospitalization with acute kidney injury, liver injury, pancreatitis, or rhabdomyolysis related to the concurrent administration of statins and fibrates.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Shizuoka Kokuho Database, focusing on patients prescribed statins, fibrates, or a combination. Four drug exposure patterns were evaluated: adding statins to fibrates (exposure 1), switching from fibrates to statins (exposure 2), adding fibrates to statins (exposure 3), and switching from statins to fibrates (exposure 4). Hospitalization for the specified conditions within 1 year was the outcome. Propensity score matching was used to create balanced cohorts for comparison.

Results: We studied 269,226 statin users and 16,282 fibrate users. After propensity score matching, there were 498 participants in the group of exposure 1, matched with 2988 in the fibrate-only group; 1180 in the group of exposure 2, matched with 7080 in the fibrate-only group; 1183 in group of exposure 3, matched with 11,830 in the statin only group; and 1356 in group of exposure 4, matched with 13,560 in the statin only group. The 1-year hospitalization rate with liver injury was higher in the group of exposure 1 than in the fibrate-only group (1.2% vs 0.3%, p < 0.01), in the group of exposure 2 than in the fibrate-only group (0.9% vs 0.3%, p < 0.01), and in the group of exposure 4 than in the statin-only group (0.6% vs 0.2%, p = 0.02). There was also a higher risk of 1-year hospitalization with acute kidney injury in group of exposure 1 than in the fibrate-only group (1.3% vs 0.3%, p = 0.01) but not in evaluations of exposure 2, 3, and 4. However, there were no differences in the risks of 1-year hospitalization with pancreatitis or rhabdomyolysis among the matched groups.

Conclusions: We have demonstrated higher risks of 1-year hospitalization with liver injury or acute kidney injury associated with the use of combinations of statins and fibrates. This underscores the need for a cautious approach to the prescribing of such drug combinations and the importance of monitoring patients for potential adverse events.