Developments in biological standardization最新文献

Cytokines (including growth factors) exist as a family of proteins that possess a vast array of pleiotropic biological activities and therapeutic potential. As with any biological therapeutic, appropriate assessment of biological potency is vital to the development of cytokines as medicinal products. In early investigations of cytokine activity, in vivo bioassays were used to assess the whole body effects of cytokines in animals. The identification of the cellular targets of each cytokine allowed the extraction of tissue and the use of cells to produce in vitro bioassays, with the drastic reduction in the number of animals required. The discovery of cytokine-responsive tumours introduced a range of immortal, homogeneous tumour cell lines that are dependent on cytokines for proliferation. This allows cell lines to be made available for general distribution to laboratories internationally for bioassays, without the need for animals. More recently, the use of recombinant DNA technology to clone the specific receptor for the cytokine required for bioassay into an unresponsive cell line has led to a highly specific 'receptor-transduced' cell line. The most recent advances include the development of receptor signalling-based biochemical bioassays for cytokines.

Ensuring the reliability and precision of assay results requires careful attention to assay design. In this case study we describe validation studies of an in vitro assay for botulinum neurotoxin type A based on its endopeptidase activity towards immobilised synthetic substrate. This assay, in common with many in vitro assays, is sensitive to changes in reagents and assay conditions and is time dependent. In addition, the toxin is not stable in solution. Differences in estimates of potency, resulting from positional factors, which are not significant in individual assays, are shown to be consistent and statistically significant over a longer series of assays. This study emphasizes that assay validation should not be viewed as a single step in assay development but must be considered as a continuing process if assay results are to be reliable and reproducible.

According to the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph Eur) monograph on Tetanus Vaccine (adsorbed) (1997: 0452), assessment of potency is based on a challenge test in guinea pigs or mice. The end-point is taken as paralysis or death. The test requires a large number of animals and causes severe distress. The aim of the present study was to refine the test, and reduce the number of animals needed, for batch release purposes. Serological assays having the potential of being internationally accepted, have been compared with Ph Eur assays. The study included five tetanus vaccines of various combinations and produced by different manufacturers. The results indicated an excellent correlation between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the challenge test (about 93% predictive value), as well as between the toxin binding inhibition (ToBI) test and the challenge test (about 95% predictive value) and between ELISA and the ToBI test (r = 0.92). Antitoxin concentrations determined by ELISA and ToBI were generally in the same range. An overall good correlation was also seen for serum pools of the guinea pigs injected with equal vaccine doses, between toxin neutralisation test in mice (TNT) and ELISA (r = 0.93) as well as between TNT and ToBI (r = 0.97). The ultimate goal of this project was to determine whether serological assays can be used for testing combined vaccines, particularly for tetanus and diphtheria components, using sera from the same animals.

Some of the guidelines for potency testing of vaccines issued by regulatory bodies such as the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) and WHO are detailed and stringent (e.g. EP monograph for Newcastle Disease (ND) Vaccine (inactivated)), whereas others only stipulate that the number of animals used should be sufficient to meet the required accuracy (e.g. EP monograph for Hepatitis A vaccine (inactivated)). Simulation studies in our laboratory using historical ND potency test data indicated that the number of animals specified in the monograph is too high; a considerable reduction from 10 to seven animals per group does not substantially influence the precision of the results. Multipoint models (e.g. EP monograph for Tetanus Vaccine (adsorbed)) require at least three dilutions per vaccine for testing for response linearity. However, when historical data clearly show that in the range used the response curves are linear, it is superfluous to verify this in every test. Furthermore, linearity has little priority for a valid parallel line assay calculation. A simulation study using historical Diphtheria potency test data showed that calculations using two dilutions per vaccine in relatively small groups of animals produced results comparable to those obtained from the full assay. This procedure still enables calculation of the relative potency, in contrast to the 1 + 1 method, which gives only a pass or fail result, while the number of animals required is only slightly higher. This method could be applied in cases where the 1 + 1 method fails. In conclusion, by providing guidelines on methods in which proven consistency in production and testing may be taken into account, manufacturers are more stimulated to look for other (cheaper) ways to test the potency of a vaccine using less animals.

Variants of intact polypeptides/proteins ranging in mass from 6,500 to 70,000 Da were easily separated using reversed-phaseHPLC (rpHPLC) or affinity chromatography. A variant of rhlGF-I, where the racemization of a serine residue was detected in the intact molecule, was resolved from rhlGF-I within 25 minutes by rpHPLC. Other variants of rhlGF-I separated by this method include methionine sulphoxide at position 59, des Gly1, des Gly1Pro2, Glu for Asp substitution at position 20 and incorrectly folded IGF-I. For rhDNase (approximately 40 kDa), affinity chromatography was able to clearly resolve three different amino acids (Asn, Asp and iso-Asp) at position 74 of the intact glycoprotein. The presence or absence of O-linked sugars on Thr -37 of recombinant human thrombopoietin was rapidly demonstrated by rpHPLC. While the separation of these types of variants is essential, the demonstration of biological activity is critical for designing specifications that allow the administration of these proteins into humans. Once a correlation exists between the variant and its biological activity, control of the manufacturing process can be better achieved with analytical methodology.

The primary value of bioassays is that they alone directly assess the biological activity of bioactive substances and products like cytokines. Appropriately designed bioassays reflect the fundamental aspects of the biological activity of a cytokine molecule, including ligand-receptor binding, signal transduction processes (often poorly understood) and the final observed biological effects. Biological assays therefore complement physicochemical and biochemical procedures which normally only assess precise molecular structural features of cytokines. Bioassays provide valuable information concerning the potency of cytokine products. This is essential for evaluating batch-to-batch consistency, appropriate formulations and stability. Bioassay data are crucial at all stages in the development of cytokine products, from early research to final quality control of finished product. However, the type and design of bioassays may differ according to the information required and its intended use. The assays may or may not directly relate to the clinical use of the product. Bioassays can be difficult to perform and time consuming, although this often reflects bad assay choice and/or design. Correct analysis of the assay results is essential if valid data are to be obtained. Standardisation, using correctly calibrated primary and secondary standards, is essential. In vivo bioassays are normally more unreliable than in vitro procedures, but in some cases in vitro systems are either not available or do not address important biological characteristics of a product. Bioassays must be validated for their intended purpose and for the types of samples to be measured. Appropriate statistical analysis should be used to derive the significance and specifications of results. This needs to address both variability in samples and assay performance. Specifications (limits) for product acceptability need to be derived from real data using several batches of cytokine product.

The development of the concept of <>, made possible through the power and detail afforded by modern biochemical and biophysical techniques, has resulted in questions being raised about the value of the more variable bioassay. However bioassays, particularly in a routine stability monitoring situation, continue to be useful and often provide unique information not obtained by other techniques. They have advantages in that they are relatively easy to perform and generally have better sensitivity than most structural techniques. They can be used to monitor for previously undetected changes - particularly those associated with conformational alterations, and can be used to monitor the effective combination of all individual changes.