Digestion最新文献

Introduction: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) requires adequate air infusion. However, cases of poor gastrointestinal wall extension due to frequent eructation have been reported. Sufficient gastrointestinal wall extension can be achieved by applying cricoid pressure during EGD. Herein, we evaluated the frequency of cases with poor gastrointestinal wall extension and the efficacy and safety of applying cricoid pressure during EGD.

Methods: This interventional study included patients who underwent EGD between January 2020 and December 2020 at the JA Akita Koseiren Yuri Kumiai General Hospital. Cases wherein folds of the greater curvature of the upper gastric body were not sufficiently extended during EGD were considered to have poor gastrointestinal wall extension. In such cases, air infusion was performed while applying cricoid pressure. This procedure was considered effective when gastric wall extension was achieved.

Results: A total of 2,000 patients were enrolled and underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy; however, five were excluded because of upper gastrointestinal tract stenosis. Observation of gastric wall extension of the greater curvature in the upper gastric body with normal air insufflation was difficult in 113 (5.7%) cases. Applying cricoid pressure was effective in 93 (82.3%) patients with poor gastric wall extension. Sufficient gastric wall extension was achieved within an average of 12.8 s in cases where cricoid pressure application was effective. No adverse events were associated with cricoid pressure application.

Conclusions: Cricoid pressure application for patients with poor gastric wall extension during EGD is useful for ensuring a sufficient field of view during observation of the gastric body.

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is a public health concern associated with high incidence rates. Sarcopenia is a known risk factor for postoperative complications, although an association between increased complications after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and sarcopenia remains undocumented. Herein, we aimed to explore the feasibility of colorectal ESD in patients with sarcopenia.

Methods: This retrospective study included 499 patients (69 with and 430 without sarcopenia). We evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of colorectal ESD.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding en bloc, R0, or curative resection rates. However, poor bowel preparation was significantly more common in the sarcopenia group. Moreover, patients with sarcopenia exhibited a significant increase in complications (37.7% vs. 10.5%). Multivariate analysis revealed that sarcopenia (odds ratio [OR]: 3.78, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.85-7.73, p < 0.001), anticoagulation therapy (OR: 3.59, 95% Cl: 1.86-6.92, p < 0.001), procedure time (OR: 1.28, 95% Cl: 1.11-1.47, p < 0.001), and resection size (OR: 1.25, 95% Cl: 1.03-1.52, p = 0.02) were significantly correlated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ≥ grade 2. The correlation between sarcopenia and CTCAE ≥ grade 2 was maintained after matching, resulting in more extended hospital stays in patients with sarcopenia. However, we detected no association between sarcopenia and overall survival and ESD-related death.

Conclusion: Sarcopenia is a risk factor for complications in colorectal ESD, suggesting that colorectal ESD could be performed for patients with sarcopenia, although much caution should be taken.

Introduction: We investigated the factors associated with synchronous multiple early gastric cancers and determined their localization.

Methods: We analyzed 8,191 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers at 33 hospitals in Japan from November 2013 to October 2016. Background factors were compared between single-lesion (n = 7,221) and synchronous multi-lesion cases (n = 970) using univariate and multivariate analyses. We extracted cases with two synchronous lesions (n = 832) and evaluated their localization.

Results: Significant independent risk factors for synchronous multiple early gastric cancer were older age (≥75 years old) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.257), male sex (OR = 1.385), severe mucosal atrophy (OR = 1.400), tumor localization in the middle (OR = 1.362) or lower region (OR = 1.404), and submucosal invasion (OR = 1.528 [SM1], 1.488 [SM2]). Depressed macroscopic type (OR = 0.679) and pure undifferentiated histology OR = 0.334) were more common in single early gastric cancers. When one lesion was in the upper region, the other was more frequently located in the lesser curvature of the middle region. When one lesion was in the middle region, the other was more frequently located in the middle region or the lesser curvature of the lower region. When one lesion was in the lower region, the other was more frequently located in the lesser curvature of the middle region or the lower region.

Conclusion: Factors associated with synchronous multiple early gastric cancer included older age, male sex, severe mucosal atrophy, tumor localization in the middle or lower region, and tumor submucosal invasion. Our findings provide useful information regarding specific areas that should be examined carefully when one lesion is detected.

Introduction: Delayed bleeding is an important adverse event following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, whether anticoagulants are risk factors for delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD remains debatable.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,708 patients who underwent colorectal ESDs between January 2015 and December 2020 at five academic medical centers in South Korea. We aimed to identify the risk factors for delayed bleeding in patients after colorectal ESD and, in particular, to evaluate the effect of anticoagulants.

Results: Delayed bleeding occurred in 40 of 1,708 patients (2.3%). The risk factors for delayed bleeding were antithrombotic agents (odds ratio [OR], 6.155; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.201-11.825; p < 0.001), antiplatelet agents (OR, 4.609; 95% CI, 2.200-9.658; p < 0.001), anticoagulants (OR, 8.286; 95% CI, 2.934-23.402; p < 0.001), and tumor location in the rectum (OR, 2.055; 95% CI, 1.085-3.897; p = 0.027). In the analysis that excluded patients taking antiplatelet agents, the delayed bleeding rate was higher in patients taking anticoagulants (1.6% no antithrombotic agents vs. 12.5% taking anticoagulants, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the delayed bleeding rate (4.2% direct oral anticoagulants vs. 25.0% warfarin, p = 0.138) or clinical outcomes according to the type of anticoagulant used.

Conclusions: Anticoagulants use was a risk factor for delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD, and there was no difference in the risk of delayed bleeding based on the type of anticoagulant used. Colorectal ESD in patients receiving anticoagulants requires careful observation and management for delayed bleeding.

Introduction: Mucosal defect closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may prevent post-ESD adverse events. Delayed bleeding is a particular concern in the rectum due to the presence of numerous blood vessels. However, rectal defect closure often fails due to the thick rectal wall. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of our newly developed endoscopic ligation with O-ring closure (E-LOC) for defects after rectal ESD.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted at a single institution. After excluding 2 patients with tumors mostly extending into the anal canal, the study cohort comprised 30 consecutive patients who underwent ESD of rectal neoplasms between July 2020 and July 2021. E-LOC using an endoscopic variceal ligation device was performed for closing mucosal defects after rectal ESD. The primary outcome was the complete closure rate. The secondary outcomes were the delayed bleeding rate, E-LOC procedure time, sustained closure rates on postoperative day (POD) 3, and E-LOC-associated complications.

Results: Complete closure of the defect (median defect size 29.0 mm) was successfully achieved in 24 cases (80%). Delayed bleeding occurred in one case with incomplete closure (3.3%). The median E-LOC procedure time was 25.5 min (interquartile range, 20.0-30.0 min). The sustained closure rates were 83.3% (20/24) on POD 3 in the 24 cases with complete closure. No E-LOC-associated complications occurred.

Discussion/conclusions: E-LOC was feasible for defect closure after rectal ESD, and probably led to a decreased incidence of delayed bleeding.

Background: Two major types of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA)-containing preparations, namely, mesalazine/5-ASA and sulfasalazine (SASP), are currently used as first-line therapy for ulcerative colitis. Recent reports show that optimization of 5-ASA therapy is beneficial for both patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Although 5-ASA and SASP have good efficacy and safety profiles, clinicians occasionally encounter patients who develop 5-ASA intolerance.

Summary: The most common symptoms of acute 5-ASA intolerance syndrome are exacerbation of diarrhea, fever, and abdominal pain. Patients who discontinue 5-ASA therapy because of intolerance have a higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes, such as hospital admission, colectomy, need for advanced therapies, and loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologics. When patients develop symptoms of 5-ASA intolerance, the clinician should consider changing the type of 5-ASA preparation. Recent genome-wide association studies and meta-analyses have shown that 5-ASA allergy is associated with certain single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Although there are no modalities or biomarkers for diagnosing 5-ASA intolerance, the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test can be used to assist in the diagnosis of acute 5-ASA intolerance syndrome with high specificity and low sensitivity. This review presents a general overview of 5-ASA and SASP in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and discusses the latest insights into 5-ASA intolerance.

Key messages: 5-ASA is used as first-line therapy for ulcerative colitis. Optimization of 5-ASA may be beneficial for patient outcomes and healthcare systems. Acute 5-ASA intolerance syndrome is characterized by diarrhea, fever, and abdominal pain. Periodic renal function monitoring is recommended for patients receiving 5-ASA.

Introduction: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe and effective procedure for small colorectal polyps ≤9 mm. There are only limited data regarding CSP of larger neoplastic lesions. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CSP for polyps between 10 and 15 mm in size.

Methods: In this prospective single-arm observational pilot study, patients with a least one polyp 10-15 mm were included. These polyps were preferably removed by CSP using a dedicated hybrid snare. The primary outcome was the histological complete resection rate (CRR) determined by pathologically negative margins of the specimen and no neoplastic tissue obtained from biopsies of the resection site margin. Secondary outcomes were en bloc resection rate, failure of CSP, and incidence of adverse events.

Results: A total of 61 neoplastic polyps were removed from 39 patients. Overall CRR was 80.3% (49/61). CSP was feasible in 78.7% (48/61) of polyps and the CRR in this group was 85.4% (41/48). When CSP failed (13/61; 21.3%), lesions were successfully resected by immediate HSP using the same snare with a CRR of 61.5% (8/13) in this group. One patient presented delayed hemorrhage after HSP of a polyp but successful hemostasis was achieved with two hemoclips. No other adverse events occurred. No recurrence was seen on follow-up colonoscopy in cases with incomplete resected polyps.

Conclusion: CSP seems to be efficient and safe in removing colorectal polyps up to 15 mm. A hybrid snare seems to be particularly advantageous for these polyps as it allows immediate conversion to HSP if CSP might fail in larger polyps. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04464837).

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to many extrapulmonary manifestations. In this case series, we report on 7 patients developing secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SSC) after severe COVID-19 with intensive care treatment.

Methods: Between March 2020 and November 2021, 544 patient cases with cholangitis treated at a German tertiary care centre were screened for SSC. Patients found to be suffering from SSC were assigned to COVID-19 group if SSC presented after a severe course of COVID-19 and to non-COVID-19 group if not. Peak liver parameters as well as intensive care treatment factors and data generated from liver elastography were compared between both groups.

Results: We identified 7 patients who developed SSC after a severe course of COVID-19. In the same period, 4 patients developed SSC due to other causes. Mean values of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were higher in the COVID-19 group than in the non-COVID-19 group (GGT: 2,689 U/L vs. 1,812 U/L and ALP: 1,445 U/L vs. 1,027 U/L), whereas intensive care treatment factors were comparable in both groups. Only the mean duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter in the COVID-19 group than in the non-COVID-19 group (22.1 days vs. 36.7 days). Liver elastography indicated a fast progression to liver cirrhosis with a mean liver stiffness of 17.3 kilopascals (kPa) in less than 12 weeks in the COVID-19 group.

Conclusions: Our data suggest a more severe course of SSC when caused by SARS-CoV-2. Reasons for this are probably multifactorial, including a direct cytopathogenic effect of the virus.

Introduction: Eosinophils in the esophageal epithelium are unevenly distributed in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal eosinophilia (EE) may be observable by endocytoscopy (EC). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EC for the diagnosis of EE.

Methods: A total of 33 EoE patients underwent EC with methylene blue staining from March 2020 to April 2021. A total of 194 EC images with corresponding biopsies were obtained. Three findings of EC, increased squamous cells (item I), increased inflammatory cells (item II), and cells with bilobed nuclei (item III), were established. These findings were reviewed by two endoscopists to diagnose EE. Another four endoscopists reviewed the images for interobserver agreement.

Results: When all three items were met by EC, the sensitivity and the accuracy for the diagnosis of EE were 88% and 76%, respectively. The integrated diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for the diagnosis of EE of the four endoscopists were significant (OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 2.94-5.40, p < 0.001). The results were similar when only item III was met. Interobserver agreement was good for item III to diagnose EE (kappa value = 0.653).

Discussion/conclusion: The diagnostic performance of EC for EE is acceptable and has good interobserver agreement. It may be useful for targeted biopsy in EoE patients.