Background: Genome plasticity of Streptococcus pneumoniae is responsible for the reduced efficacy of various antibiotics and capsular polysaccharide-based vaccines. Therefore, targets independent of capsular types are sought to control the pneumococcal pathogenicity. UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (UGPase) is one such desired candidate being responsible for the synthesis of UDP-glucose, a sugar precursor in capsular biosynthesis and metabolic Leloir pathway. Being crucial to pneumococcal pathobiology, the effect of UGPase inhibition on virulence was evaluated in vitro.
Methods: A putative inhibitor, uridine diphosphate (UDP), was evaluated for effective inhibitory concentration in S. pneumoniae and A549 cells, its efficacy and toxicity. The effect of UDP on adherence and phagocytosis was measured in human respiratory epithelial (A549 and HEp-2) and macrophage (THP1 and J774.A.1) cell lines respectively.
Results: A differential effective inhibitory concentration of UDP for UGPase inhibition was observed in S. pneumoniae and A549 cells, that is, 5 and 100 µM respectively. UDP treatments lowered percent cytotoxicity in pneumococcal-infected monolayers and didn't exert adverse effects on viabilities. S. pneumoniae adherence to host cells decreased significantly with UDP treatments. UDP induced the secretion of interleukin (IL)-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-6, and IL-8 and increased pneumococcal phagocytosis.
Conclusion: Our study shows UDP-mediated decrease in the virulence of S. pneumoniae and demonstrates UDP as an effective inhibitor of pneumococcal UGPase.
Introduction: Salbutamol and terbutaline are short-acting β2 adrenergic agonists that produce bronchial smooth muscle relaxation and are widely used in obstructive pulmonary diseases. Nevertheless, their use has been the cause of a paradoxical bronchoconstriction, which is a rare and potentially serious adverse reaction. The aim of this study is to report a case of paradoxical bronchoconstriction caused by β2 adrenergic agonists.
Methods: This case is about a 50-year-old asthmatic patient who describes a history of repeated acute asthma attacks after salbutamol inhalation or terbutaline nebulization. A double-blind crossover study was performed over 3 days, in order to compare the effects of each bronchodilator. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and maximal expiratory flow 25-75 (MEF25-75) were measured.
Results: On the first day, a bronchoconstriction caused by deep and repeated inhalations was eliminated. On the second day, an airway obstruction was confirmed by a decrease in FEV1 at 40% from baseline values after nebulization of a standard dose of terbutaline. On the third day, a spirometry was performed before and after nebulization of a standard dose of ipratropium bromide, and there were no significant changes in the spirometric parameters. Finally the patient was discharged with a written warning mentioning the danger of salbutamol and terbutaline use.
Conclusion: Salbutamol and terbutaline are generally well-tolerated β2 adrenergic agonists. Nevertheless, in rare cases, these substances can cause a paradoxical bronchoconstriction. Doctors must therefore remain vigilant about its side effect and possibly investigate each case.