Haley M. LaMonica, Ian B. Hickie, William Capon, Maya Ahia, Lexi Ewing, Wendy Lee, Frank Iorfino, Yun J. C. Song, Sarah McKenna, Kristin Cleverley
<p>Digital technologies have acted as a revolutionising force across diverse industries, including addressing health system and accessibility challenges (Botelho <span>2021</span>). The scalability and cost-effectiveness of digital technologies are essential to meet the growing demand for mental health care (McGorry et al. <span>2024</span>), enabling assessment, intervention delivery, and, importantly, routine outcome monitoring to ongoingly inform personalized recommendations about self-care, clinical, and psychosocial supports and interventions to promote better outcomes. Given the ubiquity of smartphones and internet use, particularly amongst young people, we argue that digital technologies are the only viable option to support both the mental health and academic success of post-secondary students, with data collection capabilities serving to inform the delivery of institutional services and supports that fit the needs of the student body and enable the coordination of care with traditional health systems.</p><p>Global trends indicate mental health has worsened amongst emerging adults in recent decades (McGorry et al. <span>2024</span>), contributing to a reduced life expectancy by approximately 15 years and a major lifelong burden that impacts individuals, their families, and communities globally (Jones <span>2013</span>). Emerging adulthood often overlaps with the transition into post-secondary education (i.e., college or university), an already challenging life stage that can exacerbate vulnerability to mental health problems (Lipson et al. <span>2022</span>; Solmi et al. <span>2022</span>). As a result, the prevalence and complexity of mental health-related challenges amongst post-secondary students have become an increasing concern on college and university campuses worldwide. Notably, almost one-third of post-secondary students meet diagnostic criteria for a mental disorder (Kieling et al. <span>2024</span>), relative to global prevalence rates of 13.96% and 13.63% for young people aged 15–19 years and 20–24 years respectively (Kieling et al. <span>2024</span>).</p><p>Emerging adults in post-secondary education have unique needs and experiences that warrant greater consideration within mental health policy and research (Byrom et al. <span>2025</span>). Perhaps most obviously, post-secondary education is associated with heightened academic demands, standards, and expectations often associated with anxiety and fear of failure (Cage et al. <span>2021</span>; Lisnyj et al. <span>2021</span>; Wilbraham et al. <span>2024</span>), with outcomes touted as being directly linked to future employment opportunities (Larcombe et al. <span>2022</span>). Many students are also confronted with significant financial burdens (Larcombe et al. <span>2022</span>), new living circumstances outside of home (Worsley et al. <span>2021</span>), social isolation without easy access to family and friends (Worsley et al. <span>2021</span>; Diehl et al. <span>2018</
数字技术已成为各行各业的革命性力量,包括解决卫生系统和可访问性挑战(Botelho 2021)。数字技术的可扩展性和成本效益对于满足日益增长的精神卫生保健需求至关重要(McGorry et al. 2024),使评估、干预交付,以及重要的常规结果监测能够持续提供有关自我保健、临床和社会心理支持和干预的个性化建议,以促进更好的结果。鉴于智能手机和互联网的使用无处不在,尤其是在年轻人中,我们认为数字技术是支持大专学生心理健康和学业成功的唯一可行选择,数据收集能力有助于为机构服务和支持的提供提供信息,这些服务和支持符合学生群体的需求,并使护理与传统卫生系统相协调。全球趋势表明,近几十年来,新兴成年人的心理健康状况恶化(McGorry et al. 2024),导致预期寿命缩短了约15年,成为影响全球个人、家庭和社区的重大终身负担(Jones 2013)。成年初期往往与进入高等教育(即学院或大学)的过渡阶段重叠,这是一个已经充满挑战的人生阶段,可能会加剧心理健康问题的脆弱性(Lipson et al. 2022; Solmi et al. 2022)。因此,大专学生中心理健康挑战的普遍性和复杂性已成为世界各地大学校园日益关注的问题。值得注意的是,几乎三分之一的高等教育学生符合精神障碍的诊断标准(Kieling et al. 2024),相对于15-19岁和20-24岁年轻人的全球患病率分别为13.96%和13.63% (Kieling et al. 2024)。接受高等教育的新生成年人有独特的需求和经历,需要在心理健康政策和研究中给予更多的考虑(Byrom et al. 2025)。也许最明显的是,高等教育与更高的学术要求、标准和期望有关,通常与焦虑和对失败的恐惧有关(Cage等人,2021;Lisnyj等人,2021;Wilbraham等人,2024),其结果被认为与未来的就业机会直接相关(Larcombe等人,2022)。许多学生还面临着重大的经济负担(Larcombe等人,2022),家庭以外的新生活环境(Worsley等人,2021),无法轻松接触家人和朋友的社会孤立(Worsley等人,2021;Diehl等人,2018),以及自力更生和独立的需求显著增加(Lisnyj等人,2021;Wilbraham等人,2024)。对于患有精神健康相关残疾的学生来说尤其如此,他们在中学后的环境中可能面临挑战,而这些环境本来就不是无障碍的(Tan et al. 2023)。此外,一些学生出现精神疾病对功能影响的风险增加(Iorfino et al. 2022)。例如,在澳大利亚,与高社会经济水平的学生、地铁学生、非土著学生和托雷斯海峡岛民学生相比,第一民族学生和来自社会经济水平较低的家庭、地区和农村社区的学生更有可能因为健康和压力相关的原因而脱离课程(Edwards 2015),这一发现在加拿大等世界其他地区也很明显(Shankar et al. 2013)。高等教育学生的心理健康是高等教育机构的优先事项(Cecil 2021; Clark and Morgan 2021; Melidona et al. 2021),促进了国家框架的发展(Baik et al. 2017; Baik et al. 2016; Hughes and Spanner 2019;加拿大标准协会集团心理健康委员会2020)。尽管有这些标准,但在哪些支持和干预措施最有效、对谁最有效以及在什么情况下最有效的证据方面仍然存在差距。数字卫生部门是一个发展中市场,与此同时,对基于证据的精神卫生解决方案的需求也在不断增加(Ridout等人,2024年);然而,它的潜力在中学后的环境中仍未得到充分开发。数字心理健康是指在心理卫生保健中使用数字技术,包括“促进和预防心理健康和福祉、维持福祉/自我保健、早期干预或治疗特定精神疾病”(Bond et al. 2023)。数字心理健康技术包括移动健康应用程序(例如,正念应用程序、数字日记)、可穿戴设备(例如,睡眠追踪器)、远程医疗视频会议平台、远程监控设备、基于网络的平台(例如,Innowell [Iorfino等人,2019])和人工智能聊天机器人(Bond等人,2023)。 这些技术已被证明对年轻人有效,可以检测新出现的和完全表现的精神障碍(McDonald等人,2019),监测临床和功能结果以预测个人层面的变化(Iorfino等人,2019;LaMonica等人,2022;Oudin等人,2023),通过短信、网络平台、移动应用程序和虚拟现实提供服务(Wies等人,2021);协调整个卫生系统的护理(Iorfino et al. 2021)。此外,数字技术在减少残疾人的无障碍障碍和满足各种无障碍需求方面继续发挥着关键作用(Botelho 2021)。技术变革精神卫生保健的承诺正在高等教育环境中得到应用,大多数学生都可以使用智能手机,并报告倾向于灵活、低障碍的寻求治疗方法(Lungu和Sun 2016; Bautista和Schueller 2023)。综述表明,数字心理健康干预措施可以使学生群体的抑郁和焦虑症状受益,这是全球大专学生报告的最普遍的心理健康症状之一(Kieling等人,2024;Tan等人,2023;Lattie等人,2019;Alagarajah等人,2024)。这些远程干预可以支持个性化护理的提供,使学生能够灵活地在最适合他们需求的时间寻求护理,特别是在繁忙的时间表(Bautista and Schueller 2023; Cohen et al. 2022)。然而,尽管可用性越来越高,但吸收和持续采用仍然是一个问题(Kern et al. 2018; Melcher et al. 2022)。简单地向学生提供数字心理健康技术并不是维持参与(Bautista and Schueller 2023)或实现预期结果(Garrido et al. 2019)的有效策略。在高等教育环境中,数字技术的吸收、采用和持续参与不足有两个相互作用的原因。首先,我们并不完全了解数字心理健康技术对学生的治疗需求是什么,这可能意味着干预措施对这一群体缺乏特异性,导致吸收和采用不良。其次,考虑到高等教育学生的独特需求,我们没有足够的证据表明这些工具在机构环境中能够产生什么样的结果。也就是说,干预方面(不知道X是否适用于Y)和目标方面(不知道学生是否有Y)都存在盲点。在这种情况下,治疗需求不是指安全性(Lattie et al. 2020)、可访问性和可用性(Lattie et al. 2019)等因素,这些是在这种情况下有效使用数字技术所必需的既定因素,而是指可以用技术适当应对的特定心理健康挑战(症状特征、功能障碍、孤独感)。最近的一项系统综述和荟萃分析发现,数字心理健康干预措施对经历焦虑或抑郁的大学生有效;然而,结果存在相当大的异质性,这可能源于学生需求与干预类型(即有或没有人类支持)和心理治疗(例如,认知行为治疗,多组分)之间的不匹配(Madrid-Cagigal et al. 2025)。关于什么有效和什么需要的不确定性导致了停滞,迫使高等教育机构陷入一种被大量可用的数字心理健康技术所淹没的
{"title":"Digital Tools to Support Post-Secondary Student Mental Health and Wellbeing","authors":"Haley M. LaMonica, Ian B. Hickie, William Capon, Maya Ahia, Lexi Ewing, Wendy Lee, Frank Iorfino, Yun J. C. Song, Sarah McKenna, Kristin Cleverley","doi":"10.1111/eip.70094","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eip.70094","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital technologies have acted as a revolutionising force across diverse industries, including addressing health system and accessibility challenges (Botelho <span>2021</span>). The scalability and cost-effectiveness of digital technologies are essential to meet the growing demand for mental health care (McGorry et al. <span>2024</span>), enabling assessment, intervention delivery, and, importantly, routine outcome monitoring to ongoingly inform personalized recommendations about self-care, clinical, and psychosocial supports and interventions to promote better outcomes. Given the ubiquity of smartphones and internet use, particularly amongst young people, we argue that digital technologies are the only viable option to support both the mental health and academic success of post-secondary students, with data collection capabilities serving to inform the delivery of institutional services and supports that fit the needs of the student body and enable the coordination of care with traditional health systems.</p><p>Global trends indicate mental health has worsened amongst emerging adults in recent decades (McGorry et al. <span>2024</span>), contributing to a reduced life expectancy by approximately 15 years and a major lifelong burden that impacts individuals, their families, and communities globally (Jones <span>2013</span>). Emerging adulthood often overlaps with the transition into post-secondary education (i.e., college or university), an already challenging life stage that can exacerbate vulnerability to mental health problems (Lipson et al. <span>2022</span>; Solmi et al. <span>2022</span>). As a result, the prevalence and complexity of mental health-related challenges amongst post-secondary students have become an increasing concern on college and university campuses worldwide. Notably, almost one-third of post-secondary students meet diagnostic criteria for a mental disorder (Kieling et al. <span>2024</span>), relative to global prevalence rates of 13.96% and 13.63% for young people aged 15–19 years and 20–24 years respectively (Kieling et al. <span>2024</span>).</p><p>Emerging adults in post-secondary education have unique needs and experiences that warrant greater consideration within mental health policy and research (Byrom et al. <span>2025</span>). Perhaps most obviously, post-secondary education is associated with heightened academic demands, standards, and expectations often associated with anxiety and fear of failure (Cage et al. <span>2021</span>; Lisnyj et al. <span>2021</span>; Wilbraham et al. <span>2024</span>), with outcomes touted as being directly linked to future employment opportunities (Larcombe et al. <span>2022</span>). Many students are also confronted with significant financial burdens (Larcombe et al. <span>2022</span>), new living circumstances outside of home (Worsley et al. <span>2021</span>), social isolation without easy access to family and friends (Worsley et al. <span>2021</span>; Diehl et al. <span>2018</","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"19 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504010/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145244238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Federico Fiori Nastro, Martina Pelle, Alice Clemente, Fernando Corinto, Davide Prosperi Porta, Yael Sonnino, Carmine Gelormini, Giorgio Di Lorenzo, Michele Ribolsi