Pub Date : 2018-11-01DOI: 10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0006
D. Domínguez, J. Coppock, M. Polanco
This chapter addresses challenges that can surface for some same-sex binational couples in the United States. Vulnerable to both immigration enforcement and social institutions seeking to deny the validity of their relationship, same-sex binational couples may be at increased risk for emotional hardship, relationship instability, conflict, and dissolution. The ramifications of divorce in binational relationships may include jeopardizing the residency status or lengthening the naturalization timeline; separation from children if removed from the United States; and potential removal to a country where one or both members in the partnership may be exposed to sexual prejudice. The chapter discusses the unique challenges that increase the risk of binational same-sex relationships ending in dissolution or divorce, highlighting the limited research on LGBTQ dissolution or divorce and the need for further research on clinical and legal interventions that could enhance the well-being of same-sex binational couples during and after relationship dissolution or divorce.
{"title":"Same-Sex Binational Families","authors":"D. Domínguez, J. Coppock, M. Polanco","doi":"10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses challenges that can surface for some same-sex binational couples in the United States. Vulnerable to both immigration enforcement and social institutions seeking to deny the validity of their relationship, same-sex binational couples may be at increased risk for emotional hardship, relationship instability, conflict, and dissolution. The ramifications of divorce in binational relationships may include jeopardizing the residency status or lengthening the naturalization timeline; separation from children if removed from the United States; and potential removal to a country where one or both members in the partnership may be exposed to sexual prejudice. The chapter discusses the unique challenges that increase the risk of binational same-sex relationships ending in dissolution or divorce, highlighting the limited research on LGBTQ dissolution or divorce and the need for further research on clinical and legal interventions that could enhance the well-being of same-sex binational couples during and after relationship dissolution or divorce.","PeriodicalId":114134,"journal":{"name":"LGBTQ Divorce and Relationship Dissolution","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128461527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-11-01DOI: 10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0023
Jodi A. Argentino, Ce Fiore
This chapter explores the challenges facing multipartner and multiparent families in family law during dissolution. It first explores society’s idealization of the traditional husband-wife-child family, which persists despite the fact that a diversity of family forms have long existed in the United States and are becoming increasingly common today. It explains how this idealized construct underlies family law in the United States and disadvantages multipartner and multiparent families in a variety of ways. Courts and legislatures have been slow to recognize and provide for legal rights among multipartner and multiparent families, and even where courts have recognized more than two parents, the results have been unsatisfactory. Statutes in California and Maine, by contrast, are more progressive toward multipartner and multiparent families. Preparation and education are vitally important to multipartner and multiparent families. The chapter discusses how the trust, honesty, and communication that define many polyamorous families can impact dissolution.
{"title":"Dissolution of Polyamorous Relationships, Multiple Parent Families, and Other Complex Arrangements","authors":"Jodi A. Argentino, Ce Fiore","doi":"10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0023","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the challenges facing multipartner and multiparent families in family law during dissolution. It first explores society’s idealization of the traditional husband-wife-child family, which persists despite the fact that a diversity of family forms have long existed in the United States and are becoming increasingly common today. It explains how this idealized construct underlies family law in the United States and disadvantages multipartner and multiparent families in a variety of ways. Courts and legislatures have been slow to recognize and provide for legal rights among multipartner and multiparent families, and even where courts have recognized more than two parents, the results have been unsatisfactory. Statutes in California and Maine, by contrast, are more progressive toward multipartner and multiparent families. Preparation and education are vitally important to multipartner and multiparent families. The chapter discusses how the trust, honesty, and communication that define many polyamorous families can impact dissolution.","PeriodicalId":114134,"journal":{"name":"LGBTQ Divorce and Relationship Dissolution","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116820346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-11-01DOI: 10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0016
Carla A. Pfeffer, N. N. Castañeda
This chapter offers a broad survey of existing research on trans individuals and partnerships conducted across the disciplines and professions of counseling, family studies, medicine, psychology, social work, sociology, and women’s and gender studies, with the goal of assessing and distilling factors associated with the stability and instability of relationships in which at least one of the members is trans. This chapter also provides an assessment of key sources of support and strain for trans partnerships as identified by researchers or that deserve further research exploration. Finally, the authors identify a number of researcher assumptions and biases that may cloud the interpretation of some research findings and outcomes in trans people’s partnerships, suggesting avenues for further focus in clinical practice and research.
{"title":"Trans Partnership and Marriage","authors":"Carla A. Pfeffer, N. N. Castañeda","doi":"10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0016","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter offers a broad survey of existing research on trans individuals and partnerships conducted across the disciplines and professions of counseling, family studies, medicine, psychology, social work, sociology, and women’s and gender studies, with the goal of assessing and distilling factors associated with the stability and instability of relationships in which at least one of the members is trans. This chapter also provides an assessment of key sources of support and strain for trans partnerships as identified by researchers or that deserve further research exploration. Finally, the authors identify a number of researcher assumptions and biases that may cloud the interpretation of some research findings and outcomes in trans people’s partnerships, suggesting avenues for further focus in clinical practice and research.","PeriodicalId":114134,"journal":{"name":"LGBTQ Divorce and Relationship Dissolution","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121671328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-11-01DOI: 10.1093/med-psych/9780190635176.003.0007
Rachel Donnelly, Corinne Reczek, D. Umberson
The death of a spouse is an involuntary form of relationship dissolution with deleterious health consequences for the surviving partner. Yet, to date, researchers have not examined widowhood experiences of individuals in same-sex marriages. Past research shows that spousal caregiving during illness and end-of-life planning shapes the bereavement experience for different-sex couples. Thus this chapter reviews literature on midlife caregiving, illness experiences, and end-of-life planning to provide clues about how bereavement experiences might unfold for spouses in same-sex marriages. We further provide an empirical analysis of caregiving and illness using dyadic survey data collected from same- and different-sex spouses. Our results show that same-sex married couples report receiving the most care from spouses during past health events and have the most confidence in their spouse to provide adequate care in the future. Evidence on caregiving and end-of-life experiences points to future directions for research on bereaved same-sex spouses.
{"title":"What We Know (And Don’t Know) About the Bereavement Experiences of Same-Sex Spouses","authors":"Rachel Donnelly, Corinne Reczek, D. Umberson","doi":"10.1093/med-psych/9780190635176.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190635176.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"The death of a spouse is an involuntary form of relationship dissolution with deleterious health consequences for the surviving partner. Yet, to date, researchers have not examined widowhood experiences of individuals in same-sex marriages. Past research shows that spousal caregiving during illness and end-of-life planning shapes the bereavement experience for different-sex couples. Thus this chapter reviews literature on midlife caregiving, illness experiences, and end-of-life planning to provide clues about how bereavement experiences might unfold for spouses in same-sex marriages. We further provide an empirical analysis of caregiving and illness using dyadic survey data collected from same- and different-sex spouses. Our results show that same-sex married couples report receiving the most care from spouses during past health events and have the most confidence in their spouse to provide adequate care in the future. Evidence on caregiving and end-of-life experiences points to future directions for research on bereaved same-sex spouses.","PeriodicalId":114134,"journal":{"name":"LGBTQ Divorce and Relationship Dissolution","volume":"200 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127322288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-11-01DOI: 10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0012
K. Allen
Same-sex relationship dissolution has reverberations for individuals beyond the nuclear family. This chapter discusses a lesbian-parent family, consisting of two moms and two kids—when it broke up nearly two decades ago, many other family members, including the donor and his husband, were deeply affected. This chapter reflects on this experience from the author’s perspective of a family scholar and an activist for LGBTQ family rights. In the absence of legal marriage and thus legal divorce, family lives turned out in ways that even the most careful, deliberate efforts could not anticipate nor protect. The experiences described highlight many losses and regrets, despite the intentional love and concern for all of the parents, children, and extended family members involved. These reflections on this experience are intended to honor the family as it once was and the families they have become.
{"title":"Family, Loss, and Change","authors":"K. Allen","doi":"10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0012","url":null,"abstract":"Same-sex relationship dissolution has reverberations for individuals beyond the nuclear family. This chapter discusses a lesbian-parent family, consisting of two moms and two kids—when it broke up nearly two decades ago, many other family members, including the donor and his husband, were deeply affected. This chapter reflects on this experience from the author’s perspective of a family scholar and an activist for LGBTQ family rights. In the absence of legal marriage and thus legal divorce, family lives turned out in ways that even the most careful, deliberate efforts could not anticipate nor protect. The experiences described highlight many losses and regrets, despite the intentional love and concern for all of the parents, children, and extended family members involved. These reflections on this experience are intended to honor the family as it once was and the families they have become.","PeriodicalId":114134,"journal":{"name":"LGBTQ Divorce and Relationship Dissolution","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123273617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-11-01DOI: 10.1093/med-psych/9780190635176.003.0008
D. Goodman, M. Geldenhuys
This chapter discusses the role of consensual dispute resolution (CDR), which allows parties to resolve their disputes outside of the judicial system, in same-sex relationship dissolutions. Two forms of CDR are mediation and collaborative law. In mediation, the parties meet with a neutral professional who helps the parties identify and resolve their disputes. In collaborative law, each party is represented by a collaborative attorney. The chapter, outlines characteristics of mediation and collaborative law, including their similarities and differences, and the tenets of a collaborative divorce. It then describes how the history of discrimination in the courts has affected LGBTQ families and made the use of CDR a more satisfactory and safe way to uncouple. It examines the unique issues that arise for some LGBTQ clients. Lastly, it reviews the skills a CDR professional needs to work with LGBTQ clients.
{"title":"Consensual Dispute Resolution with Same-Sex Couples","authors":"D. Goodman, M. Geldenhuys","doi":"10.1093/med-psych/9780190635176.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190635176.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the role of consensual dispute resolution (CDR), which allows parties to resolve their disputes outside of the judicial system, in same-sex relationship dissolutions. Two forms of CDR are mediation and collaborative law. In mediation, the parties meet with a neutral professional who helps the parties identify and resolve their disputes. In collaborative law, each party is represented by a collaborative attorney. The chapter, outlines characteristics of mediation and collaborative law, including their similarities and differences, and the tenets of a collaborative divorce. It then describes how the history of discrimination in the courts has affected LGBTQ families and made the use of CDR a more satisfactory and safe way to uncouple. It examines the unique issues that arise for some LGBTQ clients. Lastly, it reviews the skills a CDR professional needs to work with LGBTQ clients.","PeriodicalId":114134,"journal":{"name":"LGBTQ Divorce and Relationship Dissolution","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128386736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-11-01DOI: 10.1093/med-psych/9780190635176.003.0010
F. Tasker, K. Rensten
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) parenthood post-heterosexual relationship (PHR) dissolution was the focus of much of the early social science research on sexual minority parenting from the 1980s onward, and remains relevant today. The initial legal cases contesting LGB parenting involved mainly lesbian mothers seeking custody of their children PHR. Yet the focus of most research on LGB parenting and legislation in the twenty-first century has been on children brought up in planned LGB-parent families. This chapter highlights the key issues of sexual identity disclosure and identity intersection for LGB parents PHR. It considers family transition through single parenthood, nonresidential parenting, and stepfamily formation that might particularly marginalize LGB parents and their children PHR. The review focuses on studies of LGB parents, new same-gender partners, and children in these families. When relevant, it considers how family law relates to sexual minority identity empowerment and disempowerment PHR.
{"title":"Social Science Research on Heterosexual Relationship Dissolution and Divorce Where One Parent Comes Out as LGB","authors":"F. Tasker, K. Rensten","doi":"10.1093/med-psych/9780190635176.003.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190635176.003.0010","url":null,"abstract":"Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) parenthood post-heterosexual relationship (PHR) dissolution was the focus of much of the early social science research on sexual minority parenting from the 1980s onward, and remains relevant today. The initial legal cases contesting LGB parenting involved mainly lesbian mothers seeking custody of their children PHR. Yet the focus of most research on LGB parenting and legislation in the twenty-first century has been on children brought up in planned LGB-parent families. This chapter highlights the key issues of sexual identity disclosure and identity intersection for LGB parents PHR. It considers family transition through single parenthood, nonresidential parenting, and stepfamily formation that might particularly marginalize LGB parents and their children PHR. The review focuses on studies of LGB parents, new same-gender partners, and children in these families. When relevant, it considers how family law relates to sexual minority identity empowerment and disempowerment PHR.","PeriodicalId":114134,"journal":{"name":"LGBTQ Divorce and Relationship Dissolution","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128898254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-11-01DOI: 10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0013
Joyce Kauffman
This chapter describes the intersection of the author’s personal experience as a lesbian mother with her work as an activist and lawyer as well as the challenges involving the end of her relationship with her daughter’s other mother, who was not a legal parent. In 1978, she helped organize the first Lesbian Mothers’ Day Celebration on the steps of the State House in Boston; in 1984, she gave birth to her daughter; in 1993, Adoption of Tammy (the first appellate brief she ever wrote) was decided—giving same-sex couples the right to adopt in Massachusetts; and in 2002, she successfully petitioned the Court to allow a three-parent adoption, creating for the first time a legally recognized relationship between her former partner and their daughter. The chapter concludes with observations—based on personal and professional experience—about the work that remains to be done in order to protect LGBTQ families.
{"title":"A Lesbian Parent’s Perspective on LGBTQ Families of Choice","authors":"Joyce Kauffman","doi":"10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0013","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter describes the intersection of the author’s personal experience as a lesbian mother with her work as an activist and lawyer as well as the challenges involving the end of her relationship with her daughter’s other mother, who was not a legal parent. In 1978, she helped organize the first Lesbian Mothers’ Day Celebration on the steps of the State House in Boston; in 1984, she gave birth to her daughter; in 1993, Adoption of Tammy (the first appellate brief she ever wrote) was decided—giving same-sex couples the right to adopt in Massachusetts; and in 2002, she successfully petitioned the Court to allow a three-parent adoption, creating for the first time a legally recognized relationship between her former partner and their daughter. The chapter concludes with observations—based on personal and professional experience—about the work that remains to be done in order to protect LGBTQ families.","PeriodicalId":114134,"journal":{"name":"LGBTQ Divorce and Relationship Dissolution","volume":"14 18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131774307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-11-01DOI: 10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0018
Denise Brogan-Kator
In this essay, the author reflects on her life and the impact that transitioning from male to female had on her marriage, her children, and her life. The piece examines the coming out process; the discovery by her wife (i.e., after an episode of cross-dressing); telling their children; the couple’s attempts to keep their marriage intact despite intrapersonal, interpersonal, and financial strain; and, ultimately, the process of first separation and then divorce. In addition to exploring the experience of transitioning, and the role of this transition in the author’s separation and divorce, the chapter also addresses how employment and financial stresses—incurred in large part because of trans-related discrimination—exacerbated existing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and familial stresses.
{"title":"Transition Through a Shattered Crystal Snowglobe","authors":"Denise Brogan-Kator","doi":"10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0018","url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, the author reflects on her life and the impact that transitioning from male to female had on her marriage, her children, and her life. The piece examines the coming out process; the discovery by her wife (i.e., after an episode of cross-dressing); telling their children; the couple’s attempts to keep their marriage intact despite intrapersonal, interpersonal, and financial strain; and, ultimately, the process of first separation and then divorce. In addition to exploring the experience of transitioning, and the role of this transition in the author’s separation and divorce, the chapter also addresses how employment and financial stresses—incurred in large part because of trans-related discrimination—exacerbated existing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and familial stresses.","PeriodicalId":114134,"journal":{"name":"LGBTQ Divorce and Relationship Dissolution","volume":"2677 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124402541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-11-01DOI: 10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0009
R. Farr, A. Goldberg
As of June 2015, same-sex marriage is a right nationwide in the United States, which means legal same-sex divorce is also a reality across the nation. As many same-sex couples have children, it is likely that at least some children will experience the dissolution of their parents’ relationship. Little research has examined outcomes for children who experience their same-sex parents’ relationship dissolution. In considering these children’s outcomes, this chapter draws parallels to the literature on heterosexual parent divorce and child outcomes. It reviews data on same-sex relationship dissolution and divorce, particularly among same-sex couples who are parents. It also highlights issues unique to same-sex parents and their children who experience divorce. It discusses qualitative and quantitative research, including reflections on relevant longitudinal studies conducted by each author. It acknowledges challenges of conducting research on same-sex relationship dissolution and divorce. Finally, it discusses implications for policy, practice, and research.
{"title":"Same-Sex Relationship Dissolution and Divorce","authors":"R. Farr, A. Goldberg","doi":"10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED-PSYCH/9780190635176.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"As of June 2015, same-sex marriage is a right nationwide in the United States, which means legal same-sex divorce is also a reality across the nation. As many same-sex couples have children, it is likely that at least some children will experience the dissolution of their parents’ relationship. Little research has examined outcomes for children who experience their same-sex parents’ relationship dissolution. In considering these children’s outcomes, this chapter draws parallels to the literature on heterosexual parent divorce and child outcomes. It reviews data on same-sex relationship dissolution and divorce, particularly among same-sex couples who are parents. It also highlights issues unique to same-sex parents and their children who experience divorce. It discusses qualitative and quantitative research, including reflections on relevant longitudinal studies conducted by each author. It acknowledges challenges of conducting research on same-sex relationship dissolution and divorce. Finally, it discusses implications for policy, practice, and research.","PeriodicalId":114134,"journal":{"name":"LGBTQ Divorce and Relationship Dissolution","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126328638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：