Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-13DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01219-z
Vasiliki Kourouni, Callum D Verran, Jonathan P E White, David J Chandler
Scabies is a common and disabling ectoparasitic infestation of the skin that can clinically present in 'classical' or 'crusted' forms. Diagnosis can often be made on the basis of clinical history and careful dermoscopic examination of the skin. The International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) diagnostic criteria can support the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected scabies. Older adults are a vulnerable population; the clinical presentation of scabies can be atypical in this group and treatment can be challenging. Institutional scabies outbreaks, such as in care homes, are typically challenging to identify and, therefore, subject to diagnostic delay. These outbreaks are hard to control and an important source of morbidity, requiring simultaneous treatment of those affected, which can be complicated and time consuming. The management of scabies outbreaks involves repeated, contemporaneous (if multiple individuals) treatments with topical scabicide applications to the whole body, with decontamination of the environment(s). In some situations, topical treatment may be inappropriate and delay effective treatment.
{"title":"Scabies in older adults: What Is New in Diagnosis and Treatment?","authors":"Vasiliki Kourouni, Callum D Verran, Jonathan P E White, David J Chandler","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01219-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01219-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scabies is a common and disabling ectoparasitic infestation of the skin that can clinically present in 'classical' or 'crusted' forms. Diagnosis can often be made on the basis of clinical history and careful dermoscopic examination of the skin. The International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) diagnostic criteria can support the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected scabies. Older adults are a vulnerable population; the clinical presentation of scabies can be atypical in this group and treatment can be challenging. Institutional scabies outbreaks, such as in care homes, are typically challenging to identify and, therefore, subject to diagnostic delay. These outbreaks are hard to control and an important source of morbidity, requiring simultaneous treatment of those affected, which can be complicated and time consuming. The management of scabies outbreaks involves repeated, contemporaneous (if multiple individuals) treatments with topical scabicide applications to the whole body, with decontamination of the environment(s). In some situations, topical treatment may be inappropriate and delay effective treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"699-707"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144293527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-24DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01221-5
Lou Vinarcsik, Charles Smoller, George Grossberg
The use of drugs with psychedelic and dissociative effects for the treatment of psychiatric illnesses has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, few trials have been conducted to determine the efficacy of these agents in the specific setting of treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) in older adults. In this paper, we review notable aspects of treatment-resistant MDD in older adults, review classical and nonclassical psychedelic agents and dissociative agents presently being trialed mostly in younger populations for the treatment of depression, and review what is known about trialing these agents in older adults with treatment-resistant MDD. Given the limitations to extant standard treatment and the potential risks associated with first-line pharmacological agents such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in this population, psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy may offer an important alternative for managing treatment-resistant MDD in older adults. This subset of patients is understudied and stands to benefit significantly from improved treatment regimens. The limited research available that details psychedelic-assisted treatment in this specific group is promising. Here we focus on reviewing those agents with the most controlled data available, beginning with the dissociative anesthetic ketamine/esketamine, and the hallucinogenic agent psilocybin, and concluding with a brief review of related substances including lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), ayahuasca, ibogaine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and mescaline. Treatment-resistant MDD is highly prevalent among older adults, and while preliminary findings seem promising regarding the safety and tolerability of psychedelics, concerns remain owing to insufficient data, and therefore further research is crucial to establish the safety, efficacy, and applications of psychedelic therapy in this population.
{"title":"Use of Psychedelic Agents in Older Adults with Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder: What the Evidence Shows.","authors":"Lou Vinarcsik, Charles Smoller, George Grossberg","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01221-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01221-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of drugs with psychedelic and dissociative effects for the treatment of psychiatric illnesses has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, few trials have been conducted to determine the efficacy of these agents in the specific setting of treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) in older adults. In this paper, we review notable aspects of treatment-resistant MDD in older adults, review classical and nonclassical psychedelic agents and dissociative agents presently being trialed mostly in younger populations for the treatment of depression, and review what is known about trialing these agents in older adults with treatment-resistant MDD. Given the limitations to extant standard treatment and the potential risks associated with first-line pharmacological agents such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in this population, psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy may offer an important alternative for managing treatment-resistant MDD in older adults. This subset of patients is understudied and stands to benefit significantly from improved treatment regimens. The limited research available that details psychedelic-assisted treatment in this specific group is promising. Here we focus on reviewing those agents with the most controlled data available, beginning with the dissociative anesthetic ketamine/esketamine, and the hallucinogenic agent psilocybin, and concluding with a brief review of related substances including lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), ayahuasca, ibogaine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and mescaline. Treatment-resistant MDD is highly prevalent among older adults, and while preliminary findings seem promising regarding the safety and tolerability of psychedelics, concerns remain owing to insufficient data, and therefore further research is crucial to establish the safety, efficacy, and applications of psychedelic therapy in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"687-697"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144474321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-07-18DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01231-3
Francesco Bartoli, Daniele Cavaleri, Ilaria Riboldi, Tommaso Callovini, Cristina Crocamo, Chiara Gastaldon, Andrea Aguglia, Camilla Callegari, Simone Cavallotti, Stefania Chiappini, Marco Cruciata, Armando D'Agostino, Irene Espa, Luigi Grassi, Marta Ielmini, Silvia Mammarella, Giovanni Martinotti, Marianna Rania, Alessandro Rodolico, Rita Roncone, Valentina Roselli, Cristina Segura-Garcia, Maria Salvina Signorelli, Lorenzo Tarsitani, Giovanni Ostuzzi, Giuseppe Carrà
Background and objectives: Usual treatment approaches for late-life depression primarily involve selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Recently, the potential role of vortioxetine has garnered attention. This study aimed to investigate whether vortioxetine is superior to SSRIs in terms of efficacy and tolerability in older people with moderate-to-severe depression.
Methods: The Vortioxetine in the Elderly versus SSRIs: a Pragmatic Assessment (VESPA) study was an assessor-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial, comparing flexible doses of vortioxetine versus SSRIs in older adults with depression. This is a post-hoc analysis that excluded participants with milder symptoms of depression. The primary outcome was the change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. Secondary outcomes included clinical response (MADRS total score reduction of ≥ 50%), remission (a MADRS score < 10), and discontinuation rates. Clinical measures were conducted at baseline and at 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month (endpoint) visits.
Results: In total, 302 individuals (mean age: 73.4 ± 5.9 years; 68.9% females), comprising 152 randomized to vortioxetine and 150 to SSRIs (sertraline N = 92; paroxetine N = 19; escitalopram N = 19; citalopram N = 16; fluoxetine N = 3; fluvoxamine N = 1), were included in this post-hoc analysis. No significant differences in MADRS improvement between vortioxetine and SSRIs were observed at any follow-up visits and 6-month endpoint (-11.8 ± 10.6 versus -14.0 ± 11.6; p = 0.12). This was further confirmed by a subgroup analysis excluding drug discontinuers (-16.8 ± 9.0 versus -17.6 ± 10.3; p = 0.51). In addition, people treated with vortioxetine did not exhibit better rates of response (44.1 versus 53.0%; p = 0.11), remission (25.7 versus 34.7%; p = 0.09), and discontinuation (38.0 versus 30.2%; p = 0.17), including discontinuation owing to either side effects or inefficacy, compared with those treated with SSRIs.
Conclusions: Vortioxetine was not superior to SSRIs in terms of efficacy and tolerability in older adults with moderate-to-severe depression. Additional trials, possibly based on fixed doses of vortioxetine, are needed.
Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03779789, registered on 12 Dec 2018; EudraCT number: 2018-001444-66.
背景和目的:通常治疗老年抑郁症的方法主要包括选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)。最近,沃替西汀的潜在作用引起了人们的注意。本研究旨在探讨沃替西汀在中重度老年抑郁症患者的疗效和耐受性方面是否优于SSRIs。方法:老年人沃替西汀与SSRIs:一项实用评估(VESPA)研究是一项评估盲、随机、平行组、优势试验,比较灵活剂量的沃替西汀与SSRIs在老年抑郁症患者中的作用。这是一项事后分析,排除了抑郁症状较轻的参与者。主要结果是Montgomery-Åsberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)得分的变化。次要结局包括临床缓解(MADRS总分降低≥50%)、缓解(MADRS评分)。结果:共302例患者(平均年龄:73.4±5.9岁;68.9%女性),其中152人随机分到沃替西汀组,150人随机分到SSRIs组(舍曲林N = 92;帕罗西汀N = 19;艾司西酞普兰N = 19;西酞普兰N = 16;氟西汀N = 3;氟伏沙明N = 1),纳入事后分析。沃替西汀和SSRIs在MADRS改善方面在任何随访和6个月终点均未观察到显著差异(-11.8±10.6 vs -14.0±11.6;p = 0.12)。排除停药者的亚组分析进一步证实了这一点(-16.8±9.0 vs -17.6±10.3;p = 0.51)。此外,接受沃替西汀治疗的患者并没有表现出更好的应答率(44.1% vs 53.0%;P = 0.11),缓解(25.7% vs 34.7%;P = 0.09)和停药(38.0% vs 30.2%;p = 0.17),包括因副作用或无效而停药,与接受SSRIs治疗的患者相比。结论:沃替西汀在中重度老年抑郁症患者的疗效和耐受性方面并不优于SSRIs。需要更多的试验,可能是基于固定剂量的沃替西汀。注册:Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03779789,注册于2018年12月12日;稿号:2018-001444-66。
{"title":"Efficacy and Tolerability of Vortioxetine Versus Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Late-Life Depression: A Post-hoc Analysis of the VESPA Study.","authors":"Francesco Bartoli, Daniele Cavaleri, Ilaria Riboldi, Tommaso Callovini, Cristina Crocamo, Chiara Gastaldon, Andrea Aguglia, Camilla Callegari, Simone Cavallotti, Stefania Chiappini, Marco Cruciata, Armando D'Agostino, Irene Espa, Luigi Grassi, Marta Ielmini, Silvia Mammarella, Giovanni Martinotti, Marianna Rania, Alessandro Rodolico, Rita Roncone, Valentina Roselli, Cristina Segura-Garcia, Maria Salvina Signorelli, Lorenzo Tarsitani, Giovanni Ostuzzi, Giuseppe Carrà","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01231-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01231-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Usual treatment approaches for late-life depression primarily involve selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Recently, the potential role of vortioxetine has garnered attention. This study aimed to investigate whether vortioxetine is superior to SSRIs in terms of efficacy and tolerability in older people with moderate-to-severe depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Vortioxetine in the Elderly versus SSRIs: a Pragmatic Assessment (VESPA) study was an assessor-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial, comparing flexible doses of vortioxetine versus SSRIs in older adults with depression. This is a post-hoc analysis that excluded participants with milder symptoms of depression. The primary outcome was the change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. Secondary outcomes included clinical response (MADRS total score reduction of ≥ 50%), remission (a MADRS score < 10), and discontinuation rates. Clinical measures were conducted at baseline and at 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month (endpoint) visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 302 individuals (mean age: 73.4 ± 5.9 years; 68.9% females), comprising 152 randomized to vortioxetine and 150 to SSRIs (sertraline N = 92; paroxetine N = 19; escitalopram N = 19; citalopram N = 16; fluoxetine N = 3; fluvoxamine N = 1), were included in this post-hoc analysis. No significant differences in MADRS improvement between vortioxetine and SSRIs were observed at any follow-up visits and 6-month endpoint (-11.8 ± 10.6 versus -14.0 ± 11.6; p = 0.12). This was further confirmed by a subgroup analysis excluding drug discontinuers (-16.8 ± 9.0 versus -17.6 ± 10.3; p = 0.51). In addition, people treated with vortioxetine did not exhibit better rates of response (44.1 versus 53.0%; p = 0.11), remission (25.7 versus 34.7%; p = 0.09), and discontinuation (38.0 versus 30.2%; p = 0.17), including discontinuation owing to either side effects or inefficacy, compared with those treated with SSRIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vortioxetine was not superior to SSRIs in terms of efficacy and tolerability in older adults with moderate-to-severe depression. Additional trials, possibly based on fixed doses of vortioxetine, are needed.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03779789, registered on 12 Dec 2018; EudraCT number: 2018-001444-66.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"771-780"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313815/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144658723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-07-04DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01227-z
Jan Kottner, Joachim Dissemond
Prolonged and repeated exposure of the skin to urine and/or faeces may lead to incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). IAD is an irritant contact dermatitis characterised by pain, erythema, maceration, erosion, scaling and very often associated with secondary infection. Older adults who are incontinent are at high IAD risk. Several differential diagnoses must be separated from IAD, with allergic contact dermatitis being the most common in older people. The main prevention and treatment principles are to reduce or to avoid the exposure of the skin to urine and stool. The type of incontinence should be assessed first and strategies to enhance continence implemented. Especially in older adults, high absorbency incontinence products should be used and changed regularly to reduce overhydration of the epidermis. Protective skin care products and mild cleansing should be applied. Weeping erosions, excoriations or infection should be treated with appropriate topical products. The short-term and controlled use of corticosteroids or external urine or stool collection devices or indwelling urinary catheters might be considered in severe cases. Owing to demographic changes, the management of incontinence and associated IAD will become more important. This will be especially relevant in primary care for older adults.
{"title":"Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis in Older Adults: A Critical Review of Risk Factors, Prevention and Management.","authors":"Jan Kottner, Joachim Dissemond","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01227-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01227-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prolonged and repeated exposure of the skin to urine and/or faeces may lead to incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD). IAD is an irritant contact dermatitis characterised by pain, erythema, maceration, erosion, scaling and very often associated with secondary infection. Older adults who are incontinent are at high IAD risk. Several differential diagnoses must be separated from IAD, with allergic contact dermatitis being the most common in older people. The main prevention and treatment principles are to reduce or to avoid the exposure of the skin to urine and stool. The type of incontinence should be assessed first and strategies to enhance continence implemented. Especially in older adults, high absorbency incontinence products should be used and changed regularly to reduce overhydration of the epidermis. Protective skin care products and mild cleansing should be applied. Weeping erosions, excoriations or infection should be treated with appropriate topical products. The short-term and controlled use of corticosteroids or external urine or stool collection devices or indwelling urinary catheters might be considered in severe cases. Owing to demographic changes, the management of incontinence and associated IAD will become more important. This will be especially relevant in primary care for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"745-754"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144564682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-06-02DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01211-7
Matteo Scortichini, Myriam Dilecce, Massimo Spelta, Susan Sammak, Salvatore Riegler, Fausto Bartolini, Paolo Sciattella
Background: Osteoporosis (OP) represents a public health challenge, with OP fractures associated with high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden, and fracture risk increasing with age. We evaluated the treatment gap, subsequent fracture rate, and medical costs among patients with OP hip fracture in Italy.
Methods: From two regional administrative databases, our retrospective cohort study included adults aged ≥ 50 years hospitalized for a first OP hip fracture (index fracture; 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2018).
Study outcomes: percentage of patients not prescribed OP treatment in the 6 months following index fracture; fracture and mortality rates (mortality data only available for one region), direct medical costs, persistence and adherence to OP treatment in the 12 months following index fracture (follow-up).
Results: Of 23,961 eligible patients, 87.8% (n = 21,028) were not prescribed OP treatment in the 6 months post-index fracture, with low 12-month persistence (33.7%) and adherence (9.6%) among treated patients. During follow-up, fracture and mortality rates were 36.9 and 280.9 per 1000 patient-years, respectively; higher in non-treated versus treated (39.3 versus 24.0 and 303.7 versus 126.7) patients. Mean (SD) cost per patient was €4963 (€5509); higher in non-persistent versus persistent patients (€5832 versus €4817).
Conclusions: Among patients from two Italian regions experiencing a first hip fracture, we observed a large treatment gap, and high subsequent fracture rates and medical costs. Considering fracture risk increases with age and a globally aging population, these costs are likely to increase and pose a substantial burden on the Italian health service.
{"title":"Burden of Disease and Treatment Gap in Patients with an Osteoporotic Hip Fracture between 2015 and 2019 in Italy.","authors":"Matteo Scortichini, Myriam Dilecce, Massimo Spelta, Susan Sammak, Salvatore Riegler, Fausto Bartolini, Paolo Sciattella","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01211-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01211-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporosis (OP) represents a public health challenge, with OP fractures associated with high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden, and fracture risk increasing with age. We evaluated the treatment gap, subsequent fracture rate, and medical costs among patients with OP hip fracture in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From two regional administrative databases, our retrospective cohort study included adults aged ≥ 50 years hospitalized for a first OP hip fracture (index fracture; 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2018).</p><p><strong>Study outcomes: </strong>percentage of patients not prescribed OP treatment in the 6 months following index fracture; fracture and mortality rates (mortality data only available for one region), direct medical costs, persistence and adherence to OP treatment in the 12 months following index fracture (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 23,961 eligible patients, 87.8% (n = 21,028) were not prescribed OP treatment in the 6 months post-index fracture, with low 12-month persistence (33.7%) and adherence (9.6%) among treated patients. During follow-up, fracture and mortality rates were 36.9 and 280.9 per 1000 patient-years, respectively; higher in non-treated versus treated (39.3 versus 24.0 and 303.7 versus 126.7) patients. Mean (SD) cost per patient was €4963 (€5509); higher in non-persistent versus persistent patients (€5832 versus €4817).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients from two Italian regions experiencing a first hip fracture, we observed a large treatment gap, and high subsequent fracture rates and medical costs. Considering fracture risk increases with age and a globally aging population, these costs are likely to increase and pose a substantial burden on the Italian health service.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"643-653"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254090/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144198551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-31DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01210-8
Baptiste Chevet, Giulia Boscato Sopetto, Christian Pagnoux, Ulrich Specks, Alvise Berti, Divi Cornec
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) predominantly affect individuals aged 55-75 years, with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) being diagnosed most often between 55 and 65 years and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) between 65 and 75 years. Owing to the general increase in life expectancy, the average age at diagnosis increases, encompassing also those over 75 years old. Unfortunately, the exclusion of these older patients from many clinical trials has limited our understanding of the progression of these diseases in older subjects. The role of immunosenescence and aging in AAV pathogenesis and progression is underexplored, despite potential implications in the understanding of the disease, and potentially for disease management. Although AAV manifestations are largely consistent across age groups, certain features, such as renal involvement and the association with interstitial lung disease, may be more prevalent in older patients. Frailty must be a key consideration in therapeutic decision-making, especially when balancing the efficacy of immunosuppressants with potential side effects. Recent evidence supports the use of rituximab in addition to low-dose glucocorticoids for remission induction in life- or organ-threatening AAV, including in older populations. Furthermore, preliminary evidence supports that avacopan might be as efficient as glucocorticoids in these patients. The immunosuppressive treatment of AAV reduces the immune response to environmental pathogens, with rituximab worsening age-related hypogammaglobulinemia. Thus, prophylactic measures, including vaccination and Pneumocystis pneumonia prevention, as well as strategies to mitigate glucocorticoid side effects, should be implemented in AAV management.
{"title":"Aging in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis and Microscopic Polyangiitis: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Management.","authors":"Baptiste Chevet, Giulia Boscato Sopetto, Christian Pagnoux, Ulrich Specks, Alvise Berti, Divi Cornec","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01210-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01210-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) predominantly affect individuals aged 55-75 years, with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) being diagnosed most often between 55 and 65 years and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) between 65 and 75 years. Owing to the general increase in life expectancy, the average age at diagnosis increases, encompassing also those over 75 years old. Unfortunately, the exclusion of these older patients from many clinical trials has limited our understanding of the progression of these diseases in older subjects. The role of immunosenescence and aging in AAV pathogenesis and progression is underexplored, despite potential implications in the understanding of the disease, and potentially for disease management. Although AAV manifestations are largely consistent across age groups, certain features, such as renal involvement and the association with interstitial lung disease, may be more prevalent in older patients. Frailty must be a key consideration in therapeutic decision-making, especially when balancing the efficacy of immunosuppressants with potential side effects. Recent evidence supports the use of rituximab in addition to low-dose glucocorticoids for remission induction in life- or organ-threatening AAV, including in older populations. Furthermore, preliminary evidence supports that avacopan might be as efficient as glucocorticoids in these patients. The immunosuppressive treatment of AAV reduces the immune response to environmental pathogens, with rituximab worsening age-related hypogammaglobulinemia. Thus, prophylactic measures, including vaccination and Pneumocystis pneumonia prevention, as well as strategies to mitigate glucocorticoid side effects, should be implemented in AAV management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"615-631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254096/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144191653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01213-5
Oriane Adrien, Atiya K Mohammad, Jacqueline G Hugtenburg, Lisa M McCarthy, Simone Priester-Vink, Robbert Visscher, Patricia M L A van den Bemt, Petra Denig, Fatma Karapinar-Carkıt
{"title":"Correction: Prescribing Cascades with Recommendations to Prevent or Reverse Them: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Oriane Adrien, Atiya K Mohammad, Jacqueline G Hugtenburg, Lisa M McCarthy, Simone Priester-Vink, Robbert Visscher, Patricia M L A van den Bemt, Petra Denig, Fatma Karapinar-Carkıt","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01213-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01213-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"675-686"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254081/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144483650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-06-10DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01218-0
Paula Starke, Petra Thürmann, Thomas Grobe, Tim Friede, Tim Mathes
Objective: This study complements evidence from randomized controlled trials on the harms (e.g., hypoglycemia) of sulfonylureas compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in older adults using real-world data. Existing evidence suggests an increased risk of hypoglycemia, falls, fractures, and cardiovascular events.
Methods: Using target trial emulation, we analyzed a retrospective cohort drawn from German routine claims data. We included patients older than 65 years who initiated DPP4i (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, or saxagliptin) or sulfonylureas (glibenclamid or glimepirid) as add on to metformin between 2011 and 2018. Confounding was adjusted for through overlap weighting, and the average treatment effects were estimated in the overlap population using generalized linear models.
Results: Among 171,318 eligible patients, 111,865 (65%) received DPP4i and 59,453 (35%) sulfonylureas. Patients treated with DPP4i had a higher prevalence of all observed comorbidities. Applying overlap weights to adjust for confounding, patients treated with DPP4i had a higher rate of combined all-cause hospitalizations and outpatient visits compared with those treated with sulfonylureas (rate ratio = 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.03) in the total population. In contrast, we found a protective effect of DPP4i on the risk for severe hypoglycemia in the subgroups of new users (ratio rate (RR) = 0.51, 95% CI 0.33, 0.76) and patients with severe renal insufficiency (RR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.16, 0.61).
Conclusions: Deprescribing sulfonylureas and using DPP4i instead may slightly reduce harm in some subgroups of older adults, which supports recommendations of existing lists of potentially inappropriate medications.
目的:本研究补充了随机对照试验中磺脲类药物与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4i)治疗老年人2型糖尿病的危害(如低血糖)的证据。现有证据表明,低血糖、跌倒、骨折和心血管事件的风险增加。方法采用目标试验模拟方法,对来自德国常规索赔数据的回顾性队列进行分析。我们纳入了在2011年至2018年期间服用DPP4i(西格列汀、维格列汀或沙格列汀)或磺脲类(格列本脲或格列吡脲)作为二甲双胍补充的65岁以上患者。通过重叠加权调整混杂因素,并使用广义线性模型估计重叠群体中的平均处理效果。结果:在171,318例符合条件的患者中,111865例(65%)接受了DPP4i治疗,59,453例(35%)接受了磺脲类药物治疗。接受DPP4i治疗的患者在所有观察到的合并症中都有较高的患病率。应用重叠权重来调整混杂因素,与磺脲类药物治疗的患者相比,接受DPP4i治疗的患者在总人口中有更高的全因住院和门诊就诊率(比率比= 1.03,95% CI 1.02-1.03)。相比之下,我们发现DPP4i对新使用者亚组(比率(RR) = 0.51, 95% CI 0.33, 0.76)和严重肾功能不全患者(RR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.16, 0.61)的严重低血糖风险有保护作用。结论:减少磺脲类药物的处方并使用DPP4i可能会略微降低某些老年人亚组的危害,这支持了现有潜在不适当药物清单的建议。
{"title":"Real-World Harm Reduction of Metformin Plus DPP4 Inhibitors versus Metformin Plus Sulfonylureas in Older Adults: A Target Trial Emulation Using German Claims Data.","authors":"Paula Starke, Petra Thürmann, Thomas Grobe, Tim Friede, Tim Mathes","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01218-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01218-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study complements evidence from randomized controlled trials on the harms (e.g., hypoglycemia) of sulfonylureas compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in older adults using real-world data. Existing evidence suggests an increased risk of hypoglycemia, falls, fractures, and cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using target trial emulation, we analyzed a retrospective cohort drawn from German routine claims data. We included patients older than 65 years who initiated DPP4i (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, or saxagliptin) or sulfonylureas (glibenclamid or glimepirid) as add on to metformin between 2011 and 2018. Confounding was adjusted for through overlap weighting, and the average treatment effects were estimated in the overlap population using generalized linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 171,318 eligible patients, 111,865 (65%) received DPP4i and 59,453 (35%) sulfonylureas. Patients treated with DPP4i had a higher prevalence of all observed comorbidities. Applying overlap weights to adjust for confounding, patients treated with DPP4i had a higher rate of combined all-cause hospitalizations and outpatient visits compared with those treated with sulfonylureas (rate ratio = 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.03) in the total population. In contrast, we found a protective effect of DPP4i on the risk for severe hypoglycemia in the subgroups of new users (ratio rate (RR) = 0.51, 95% CI 0.33, 0.76) and patients with severe renal insufficiency (RR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.16, 0.61).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deprescribing sulfonylureas and using DPP4i instead may slightly reduce harm in some subgroups of older adults, which supports recommendations of existing lists of potentially inappropriate medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"655-663"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254066/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144257579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-06-18DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01216-2
Jordan Westra, Mukaila Raji, Jacques Baillargeon, Rajender R Aparasu, Yong-Fang Kuo
Objective: Assess the association of opioids and gabapentinoids with changes in frailty among Medicare beneficiaries who used opioids for 90 or more consecutive days.
Methods: Using a Medicare sample between 2014 and 2020, this study included long-term opioid users who were eligible for Medicare parts A, B, and D for 3 years and had no prior gabapentinoid use. The study was broken into three 1-year periods: lookback, exposure, and outcome. The exposure of interest was gabapentinoid and opioid use measured in period 2. The primary outcome was difference in frailty between periods 1 and 3. Linear regression was used to assess the difference in frailty change by gabapentinoid and opioid use. Multinomial regression was also used to assess the odds of categorical frailty change by gabapentinoid and opioid use.
Results: Overall, the changes in frailty between assessment periods were small. Those who had no continued opioid/no gabapentinoid use showed decreases in frailty (- 0.0005), while each of the other three groups increased in frailty between the assessment periods (opioids only, 0.0040; gabapentinoids only, 0.0136; opioids + gabapentinoids, 0.0142). In addition, each of the drug groups showed increased odds for large increases in frailty compared with those who had no continued opioid/no gabapentinoid use (opioids only, odds ratio (OR): 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.49; gabapentinoids only, OR: 3.12, 95% CI 1.75-5.55; opioids + gabapentinoids, OR: 2.30, 95% CI 1.85-2.87).
Conclusions: Using gabapentinoids, opioids, or a combination of the two showed greater increases in frailty compared with those who used neither drug after long-term opioid use.
目的:评估阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物与连续使用阿片类药物90天或更长时间的医疗保险受益人虚弱变化的关系。方法:使用2014年至2020年的医疗保险样本,本研究包括符合医疗保险a, B和D部分3年且先前未使用加巴喷丁类药物的长期阿片类药物使用者。这项研究分为三个为期一年的阶段:回顾、接触和结果。在第2期测量加巴喷丁类药物和阿片类药物的使用。主要结果是第1期和第3期虚弱程度的差异。采用线性回归评估加巴喷丁类药物和阿片类药物使用对衰弱变化的差异。多项回归也用于评估加巴喷丁类药物和阿片类药物使用导致分类虚弱改变的几率。结果:总体而言,虚弱程度在评估期间的变化很小。那些没有继续使用阿片类药物/加巴喷丁类药物的人虚弱程度下降(- 0.0005),而其他三组在评估期间的虚弱程度均有所增加(仅阿片类药物,0.0040;仅加巴喷丁类,0.0136;阿片类药物+加巴喷丁素,0.0142)。此外,与不继续使用阿片类药物/不使用加巴喷丁类药物的患者相比,每个药物组的脆弱性大幅增加的几率都有所增加(仅使用阿片类药物,优势比(OR): 1.25, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.04-1.49;仅加巴喷丁类,OR: 3.12, 95% CI 1.75-5.55;阿片+加巴喷丁类药物,OR: 2.30, 95% CI 1.85-2.87)。结论:与长期使用阿片类药物的患者相比,使用加巴喷丁类药物、阿片类药物或两者联合使用的患者虚弱程度增加更大。
{"title":"Association Between Gabapentinoid Use and Changes in Claims-Based Frailty Among Long-Term Opioid Users.","authors":"Jordan Westra, Mukaila Raji, Jacques Baillargeon, Rajender R Aparasu, Yong-Fang Kuo","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01216-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01216-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the association of opioids and gabapentinoids with changes in frailty among Medicare beneficiaries who used opioids for 90 or more consecutive days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a Medicare sample between 2014 and 2020, this study included long-term opioid users who were eligible for Medicare parts A, B, and D for 3 years and had no prior gabapentinoid use. The study was broken into three 1-year periods: lookback, exposure, and outcome. The exposure of interest was gabapentinoid and opioid use measured in period 2. The primary outcome was difference in frailty between periods 1 and 3. Linear regression was used to assess the difference in frailty change by gabapentinoid and opioid use. Multinomial regression was also used to assess the odds of categorical frailty change by gabapentinoid and opioid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the changes in frailty between assessment periods were small. Those who had no continued opioid/no gabapentinoid use showed decreases in frailty (- 0.0005), while each of the other three groups increased in frailty between the assessment periods (opioids only, 0.0040; gabapentinoids only, 0.0136; opioids + gabapentinoids, 0.0142). In addition, each of the drug groups showed increased odds for large increases in frailty compared with those who had no continued opioid/no gabapentinoid use (opioids only, odds ratio (OR): 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.49; gabapentinoids only, OR: 3.12, 95% CI 1.75-5.55; opioids + gabapentinoids, OR: 2.30, 95% CI 1.85-2.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using gabapentinoids, opioids, or a combination of the two showed greater increases in frailty compared with those who used neither drug after long-term opioid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"633-642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12750500/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144324737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-05-18DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01214-4
Maria A Lopez-Olivo, Aliza R Karpes Matusevich, Jean H Tayar, Huifang Lu
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune condition disproportionately affecting older adults (> 60 years), who often experience increased disease severity and comorbidities, including cancer. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, examining the prevalence of malignancy in patients with RA, associated risk factors, and treatment challenges, including management considerations such as psychological distress and lifestyle modifications. Clinical guidelines and consensus statements were summarized to provide practical insights for optimizing care. Older adults with RA are at an elevated risk for developing cancer due to chronic inflammation, immunosenescence from aging, and shared risk factors such as smoking. Patients with RA tend to have poorer cancer survival rates than individuals without RA, particularly for lung cancer and lymphoma. Immunosuppressive therapies used to treat RA may modestly increase cancer risks but are critical for disease control. Current guidelines emphasize discontinuation or adjustment of RA therapies upon cancer diagnosis, with tailored approaches based on cancer type and stage. Non-pharmacologic interventions, including lifestyle modifications and psychological support, play a vital role in improving quality of life and mitigating disease flares during cancer treatment. The management of RA in older adults with a history of cancer requires a personalized, multidisciplinary approach that balances the need for RA symptom control without affecting cancer outcomes. Shared decision-making, incorporating patient preferences and comorbidities, is critical for optimizing care. Further research is needed to strengthen evidence-based guidelines for this population and address gaps in understanding treatment safety and efficacy.
{"title":"Managing Rheumatoid Arthritis in Older Adults with Cancer.","authors":"Maria A Lopez-Olivo, Aliza R Karpes Matusevich, Jean H Tayar, Huifang Lu","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01214-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01214-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune condition disproportionately affecting older adults (> 60 years), who often experience increased disease severity and comorbidities, including cancer. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, examining the prevalence of malignancy in patients with RA, associated risk factors, and treatment challenges, including management considerations such as psychological distress and lifestyle modifications. Clinical guidelines and consensus statements were summarized to provide practical insights for optimizing care. Older adults with RA are at an elevated risk for developing cancer due to chronic inflammation, immunosenescence from aging, and shared risk factors such as smoking. Patients with RA tend to have poorer cancer survival rates than individuals without RA, particularly for lung cancer and lymphoma. Immunosuppressive therapies used to treat RA may modestly increase cancer risks but are critical for disease control. Current guidelines emphasize discontinuation or adjustment of RA therapies upon cancer diagnosis, with tailored approaches based on cancer type and stage. Non-pharmacologic interventions, including lifestyle modifications and psychological support, play a vital role in improving quality of life and mitigating disease flares during cancer treatment. The management of RA in older adults with a history of cancer requires a personalized, multidisciplinary approach that balances the need for RA symptom control without affecting cancer outcomes. Shared decision-making, incorporating patient preferences and comorbidities, is critical for optimizing care. Further research is needed to strengthen evidence-based guidelines for this population and address gaps in understanding treatment safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"599-614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144093166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}