Drugs & Aging最新文献

Objective: The aim was to evaluate prevalence and factors associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) de-escalation in older adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: We identified adults ≥ 66 years of age with RA on anti-TNF therapy within 6 months after RA diagnosis with at least 6-7 months duration of use (proxy for stable use), using 20% Medicare data from 2008-2017. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, including concomitant use of glucocorticoid (GC), were collected. Anti-TNF use was categorized as either de-escalation (identified by dosing interval increase, dose reduction, or cessation of use) or continuation. We used (1) an observational cohort design with Cox regression to assess patient characteristics associated with de-escalation and (2) a case-control design with propensity score-adjusted logistic regression to assess the association of de-escalation with different clinical conditions and concomitant medication use.

Results: We identified 5106 Medicare beneficiaries with RA on anti-TNF, 65.5% of whom had de-escalation. De-escalation was more likely with older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.02) or greater comorbidity (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.09), but was less likely with low-income subsidy status (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92), adjusting for patient sex and race/ethnicity. Lower odds of de-escalation were associated with serious infection (odds ratio [OR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.94), new heart failure diagnosis (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95), and long-term GC use (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95), whereas higher odds were associated with concomitant methotrexate use (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31).

Conclusions: Anti-TNFs are de-escalated in two-thirds of older adults with RA in usual care. Further study is needed on RA outcomes after anti-TNF de-escalation.

Background: Although gabapentin has been increasingly prescribed to older adults, the relation between gabapentin initiation and longer-term neurocognitive changes is not well understood. Thus, this study aimed to examine the association of gabapentin initiation with cognitive and motor function decline in older adult participants with cognitive impairment.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (2005-March 2023). Participants with cognitive impairment at the visit of gabapentin initiation (i.e., index visit) were included. Using the incidence density sampling method, up to nine non-users were randomly selected for each initiator. Cognitive decline over 1 year was defined as any increase in Clinical Dementia Rating global score (CDR^®GLOB) or a 1-point increase in CDR^® sum of boxes (CDR^®SB). Functional status decline over 1 year was defined as at least a 3-point increase in the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) sum or a 0.3-point increase of mean of FAQ. Motoric decline over 1 year was defined as new clinician reports of gait disorder, falls, and slowness. To mitigate confounding and selection bias, joint stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights and censoring weights were used. Analyses compared index with index + 1 and index + 2 visits.

Results: For the study of cognitive and functional status decline, we included 505 initiators (mean age [SD] 78.8 [7.4]; male = 45%) and 4545 non-users (79.2 [7.6]; 50.1%). For the study of motor decline, we included 353 initiators (78.3 [7.2]; 42.8%) and 3177 non-users (78.5 [7.4]; 48.1%). Gabapentin initiation was not statistically associated with decline on CDR^®GLOB, CDR^®SB, FAQ sum, or mean FAQ at the index + 1 or index + 2 visits. However, gabapentin initiation was significantly associated with increased odds of new falls at the index + 2 visit (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.5 [1.3, 4.6]).

Conclusions: Over 1 or 2 years of follow-up, gabapentin initiation was not associated with decline in cognitive or functional status but was associated with increased odds of falling among research participants with cognitive impairment.

In an era marked by a global demographic shift towards an aging society, there is a heightened prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) among older adults. The burden of CKD spans from kidney-related complications to impacting psychological well-being, giving rise to depressive symptoms and caregiver burnout. This article delves into CKD prevention strategies within the context of aging, contributing to the discourse by exploring its multifaceted aspects. The prevention of CKD in the older adults necessitates a comprehensive approach. Primary prevention is centered on the modification of risk factors, acknowledging the intricate interplay of various comorbidities. Secondary prevention focuses on early CKD identification. Tertiary prevention aims to address factors contributing to CKD progression and complications, emphasizing the importance of timely interventions. This comprehensive strategy aims to enhance the quality of life for individuals affected by CKD, decelerating the deterioration of functional status. By addressing CKD at multiple levels, this approach seeks to effectively and compassionately care for the aging population.

Background: Surgeons have come under increased scrutiny for postoperative pain management, particularly for opioid prescribing. To decrease opioid use but still provide pain control, nonopioid medications such as muscle relaxants are being used, which can be harmful in older adults. However, the prevalence of muscle relaxant prescribing, trends in use over time, and risk of prolonged use are unknown.

Study design: Using a 20% representative Medicare sample, we conducted a retrospective analysis of muscle relaxant prescribing to patients ≥ 65 years of age. We merged patient data from Medicare Carrier, MedPAR, and Outpatient Files with Medicare Part D for the years 2013-2018. A total of 14 surgical procedures were included to represent a wide range of anatomic regions and specialties.

Results: The study cohort included 543,929 patients. Of the cohort, 8111 (1.5%) received a new muscle relaxant prescription at discharge. Spine procedures accounted for 12% of all procedures but 56% of postoperative prescribing. Overall, the rate of prescribing increased over the time period (1.4-2.0%, p < 0.001), with increases in prescribing primarily in the spine (7-9.6%, p < 0.0001) and orthopedic procedure groups (0.9-1.4%, p < 0.0001). Of patients discharged with a new muscle relaxant prescription, 10.7% had prolonged use.

Conclusions: The use of muscle relaxants in the postoperative period for older adults is low, but increasing over time, especially in ortho and spine procedures. While pain control after surgery is crucial, surgeons should carefully consider the risks of muscle relaxant use, especially for older adults who are at higher risk for medication-related problems.

Cancer is a disease that mostly affects older adults and because of the aging of the population, the number of older adults diagnosed with cancer will increase significantly around the world. With increasing age, more older adults are living with frailty, and this may impact the tolerability of cancer treatments. International guidelines, such as the American Society for Clinical Oncology geriatric oncology guideline, recommend a geriatric assessment and management for all older adults with cancer to support the treatment decision-making process as well as develop a plan for supportive care interventions to support the older adults during cancer treatments. While there is clinical trial evidence to support a geriatric assessment and management for older adults receiving chemotherapy, there is less evidence to support a geriatric assessment for older adults starting immunotherapy. There are increasing numbers of new immunotherapies and targeted therapies available for older adults with cancer but often few older adults have been included in the clinical trials, leaving less evidence for clinicians to guide treatment decisions. In this current opinion, we review the current evidence on the use of a geriatric assessment and management in the context of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. We review how a geriatric assessment could support older adults making treatment decisions for immunotherapy, review how geriatric assessment parameters are linked with outcomes and provide guidance on how geriatric assessment can guide the supportive care plan during immunotherapy treatment.

The objective of this review is to summarize and appraise the research methodology, emerging findings, and future directions in pharmacoepidemiologic studies assessing the benefits and harms of pharmacotherapies in older adults with different levels of frailty. Older adults living with frailty are at elevated risk for poor health outcomes and adverse effects from pharmacotherapy. However, current evidence is limited due to the under-enrollment of frail older adults and the lack of validated frailty assessments in clinical trials. Recent advancements in measuring frailty in administrative claims and electronic health records (database-derived frailty scores) have enabled researchers to identify patients with frailty and to evaluate the heterogeneity of treatment effects by patients' frailty levels using routine health care data. When selecting a database-derived frailty score, researchers must consider the type of data (e.g., different coding systems), the length of the predictor assessment period, the extent of validation against clinically validated frailty measures, and the possibility of surveillance bias arising from unequal access to care. We reviewed 13 pharmacoepidemiologic studies published on PubMed from 2013 to 2023 that evaluated the benefits and harms of cardiovascular medications, diabetes medications, anti-neoplastic agents, antipsychotic medications, and vaccines by frailty levels. These studies suggest that, while greater frailty is positively associated with adverse treatment outcomes, older adults with frailty can still benefit from pharmacotherapy. Therefore, we recommend routine frailty subgroup analyses in pharmacoepidemiologic studies. Despite data and design limitations, the findings from such studies may be informative to tailor pharmacotherapy for older adults across the frailty spectrum.

Background: Previous research has suggested that the use of cannabis-based medicinal products is increasing most rapidly among older aged individuals (65+ years). Despite this, little is known about the characteristics of older people using cannabis-based medicinal products and their effectiveness.

Objectives: We aimed to document the characteristics, outcomes and prescribing patterns of individuals aged 65+ years receiving prescribed cannabis compared to younger individuals receiving prescribed cannabis.

Methods: Data from T21, an observational study of patients seeking treatment with medicinal cannabinoids, including self-report ratings of quality of life (assessed via the EQ-5D-5L), general health (assessed via the visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D-5L), mood (assessed via the Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and sleep (assessed using four items derived from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) were available at treatment entry [n = 4228; 198 (4.7%) 65+ years] and at a 3-month follow-up [n = 2455; 98 (4.2%) = 65+ years].

Results: Relative to younger individuals, those aged over 64 years were more likely to be female (52.5% vs 47.0%; p < 0.001), more likely to report pain as their primary condition (76.3% vs 45.6%; p < 0.001) and less likely to report current daily use (20.2% vs 60.3%, p < 0.001). They received fewer cannabis-based medicinal products (mean = 1.4 vs 2.1; F_(1,2199) = 32.3, p < 0.001) and were more likely to receive a prescription for a cannabidiol dominant oil (17.5% vs 5.7%; p < 0.001) and less likely to receive a prescription for delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol dominant flower (32.5% vs 75.2%; p < 0.001). There were significant improvements across all measures of well-being (p < 0.001), but the extent of improvements in sleep were more marked in younger individuals (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: There are important differences between individuals aged 65+ years and younger individuals receiving cannabis-based medicinal products. Older aged individuals experience considerable improvement in health and well-being when prescribed cannabis-based medicinal products.

Background: Listing tools have been developed to improve medications in older patients, including the Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) list, a clinically validated, positive-negative list of medication appropriateness. Here, we aim to validate MyFORTA, an automated tool for individualized application of the FORTA list.

Methods: 331 participants of a multi-center cohort study (AgeCoDe) for whom the FORTA score (sum of overtreatment and undertreatment errors) had been determined manually (gold standard [GS]) were reassessed using the automated MyFORTA (MF) tool. This tool determines the score from ATC and ICD codes combined with clinical parameters.

Results: The FORTA scores were 9.01 ± 2.91 (mean ± SD, MF) versus 6.02 ± 2.52 (GS) (p < 0.00001). Removing undertreatment errors for calcium/vitamin D (controversial guidelines) and influenza/pneumococcal vaccinations (no robust information in the database), the difference decreased: 7.5 ± 2.7 (MF) versus 5.98 ± 2.55 (GS) (p < 0.00001). The remaining difference was driven by, for example, missing nitro spray in coronary heart disease/acute coronary syndrome as the related information was rarely found in the database, but notoriously detected by MF. Three hundred and forty errors from those 100 patients with the largest score deviation accounted for 68% of excess errors by MF.

Conclusion: MF was more sensitive to detect medication errors than GS, all frequent errors only detected by MF were plausible, and almost no adaptations of the MF algorithm seem indicated. This automated tool to check medication appropriateness according to the FORTA list is now validated and represents the first clinically directed algorithm in this context. It should ease the application of FORTA and help to implement the proven beneficial effects of FORTA on clinical endpoints.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection represents one of the most common infections during childhood, with significant morbidity and mortality in newborns and in the early years of life. RSV is a common infection throughout all age groups, largely undetected and underestimated in adults, with a disproportionately high impact in older individuals. RSV infection has a wide range of clinical presentations, from asymptomatic conditions to acute pneumonia and severe life-threatening respiratory distress, including exacerbations of underlying chronic conditions. Overall, the incidence of RSV infections requiring medical attention increases with age, and it is highest among persons ≥ 70 years of age. As a consequence of a combination of an aging population, immunosenescence, and the related increased burden of comorbidities, high-income countries are at risk of developing RSV epidemics. The standard of care for RSV-infected patients remains supportive, including fluids, antipyretics, and oxygen support when needed. There is an urgent need for antivirals and preventive strategies in this population, particularly in individuals at higher risk of severe outcomes following RSV infection. In this review, we describe prevention and treatment strategies for RSV illnesses, with a deep focus on the novel data on vaccination that has become available (Arexvy, GSK, and Abrysvo, Pfizer) for older adults.