首页 > 最新文献

Drugs & Aging最新文献

英文 中文
Drugs and Healthy Aging. 药物与健康老龄化
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01208-2
Sarah N Hilmer, Luigi Ferrucci, Antonio Cherubini

Appropriate drug treatment can enhance the likelihood of experiencing healthy aging and maintaining functional ability up to very late in life. Strong evidence exists that overall drugs can help prevent and manage diseases. However, such evidence is mostly available from studies that are not representative of older people and do not include functional/well-being outcomes. Therapeutic drugs can also impair physical and cognitive function and social interactions, particularly in the context of polypharmacy, multimorbidity and frailty. Certain drugs can affect the ability to exercise and consume a healthy diet, which are key nonpharmacological interventions that promote healthy aging. Yet, exercise and nutritional interventions can help manage adverse drug reactions. In the future, drugs (gerotherapeutics) may be developed that slow the aging process, which should prevent or delay the incidence and progression of many chronic diseases, improving healthy aging.

适当的药物治疗可以提高经历健康衰老的可能性,并在生命的后期保持功能能力。强有力的证据表明,综合用药可以帮助预防和控制疾病。然而,这些证据大多来自不具有代表性的老年人研究,也不包括功能/福祉结果。治疗药物也可能损害身体和认知功能以及社会互动,特别是在多种药物、多种疾病和虚弱的情况下。某些药物可以影响锻炼和健康饮食的能力,这是促进健康衰老的关键非药物干预措施。然而,锻炼和营养干预可以帮助控制药物不良反应。在未来,可能会开发出减缓衰老过程的药物(老年治疗药物),这应该可以预防或延缓许多慢性疾病的发生和进展,改善健康老龄化。
{"title":"Drugs and Healthy Aging.","authors":"Sarah N Hilmer, Luigi Ferrucci, Antonio Cherubini","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01208-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01208-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Appropriate drug treatment can enhance the likelihood of experiencing healthy aging and maintaining functional ability up to very late in life. Strong evidence exists that overall drugs can help prevent and manage diseases. However, such evidence is mostly available from studies that are not representative of older people and do not include functional/well-being outcomes. Therapeutic drugs can also impair physical and cognitive function and social interactions, particularly in the context of polypharmacy, multimorbidity and frailty. Certain drugs can affect the ability to exercise and consume a healthy diet, which are key nonpharmacological interventions that promote healthy aging. Yet, exercise and nutritional interventions can help manage adverse drug reactions. In the future, drugs (gerotherapeutics) may be developed that slow the aging process, which should prevent or delay the incidence and progression of many chronic diseases, improving healthy aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"591-598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254174/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144552599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors for Vancomycin-Induced Nephrotoxicity and Kidney Prognosis in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: A Retrospective Study. 75岁及以上患者万古霉素所致肾毒性和肾脏预后的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01203-7
Masaki Takigawa, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Masako Kinoshita, Toshihiro Ishii, Masayuki Masuda

Introduction: Whether risk factors for vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity (VIN) development reported in recent years are also risk factors in the older population has not yet been fully investigated. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for VIN development in the older population and to examine factors influencing kidney prognosis after VIN development.

Methods: A total of 468 patients aged ≥ 75 years were included in this study. Factors related to VIN onset in older adults were examined through logistic regression analysis.

Results: A total of 40 patients (8.5%) with VIN were identified. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in body mass index (BMI), combined use of tazobactam/piperacillin (T/P), and intensive care unit admission between the VIN and non-VIN groups (P = 0.042, 0.005, and 0.040, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified the combined use of T/P as a factor related to VIN. In patients aged 85 years or older, the concomitant use of T/P and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were identified as factors related to VIN. Compared with the VIN recovery group, the nonrecovery group had a longer time to VIN onset and a higher proportion of patients on concomitant diuretics.

Conclusions: This study revealed that the combined use of T/P and ICU admission were risk factors for VIN in older individuals. Additionally, the time until VIN onset and the concomitant use of diuretics may affect the kidney prognosis of older patients who develop VIN. When administering vancomycin to older patients, it is necessary to eliminate or be cautious of these factors in relation to VIN development and kidney prognosis.

近年来报道的万古霉素引起肾毒性(VIN)发展的危险因素是否也是老年人群的危险因素,目前尚未得到充分的研究。本研究旨在探讨老年人群VIN发生的危险因素,并探讨影响VIN发生后肾脏预后的因素。方法:共纳入468例年龄≥75岁的患者。通过logistic回归分析检查老年人VIN发病的相关因素。结果:共确诊VIN患者40例(8.5%)。单因素分析显示,VIN组和非VIN组在体重指数(BMI)、他唑巴坦/哌拉西林联合使用(T/P)和重症监护病房入住率方面存在显著差异(P分别= 0.042、0.005和0.040)。多变量分析表明,T/P的联合使用是与VIN相关的一个因素。在85岁及以上的患者中,同时使用T/P和入住重症监护病房(ICU)被确定为VIN相关因素。与VIN恢复组相比,未恢复组发生VIN的时间更长,同时使用利尿剂的患者比例更高。结论:本研究表明,联合使用T/P和ICU住院是老年人VIN的危险因素。此外,直到VIN发病的时间和同时使用利尿剂可能会影响老年VIN患者的肾脏预后。老年患者使用万古霉素时,有必要消除或谨慎考虑这些与VIN发展和肾脏预后相关的因素。
{"title":"Risk Factors for Vancomycin-Induced Nephrotoxicity and Kidney Prognosis in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Masaki Takigawa, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Masako Kinoshita, Toshihiro Ishii, Masayuki Masuda","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01203-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01203-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Whether risk factors for vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity (VIN) development reported in recent years are also risk factors in the older population has not yet been fully investigated. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for VIN development in the older population and to examine factors influencing kidney prognosis after VIN development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 468 patients aged ≥ 75 years were included in this study. Factors related to VIN onset in older adults were examined through logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 patients (8.5%) with VIN were identified. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in body mass index (BMI), combined use of tazobactam/piperacillin (T/P), and intensive care unit admission between the VIN and non-VIN groups (P = 0.042, 0.005, and 0.040, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified the combined use of T/P as a factor related to VIN. In patients aged 85 years or older, the concomitant use of T/P and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were identified as factors related to VIN. Compared with the VIN recovery group, the nonrecovery group had a longer time to VIN onset and a higher proportion of patients on concomitant diuretics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the combined use of T/P and ICU admission were risk factors for VIN in older individuals. Additionally, the time until VIN onset and the concomitant use of diuretics may affect the kidney prognosis of older patients who develop VIN. When administering vancomycin to older patients, it is necessary to eliminate or be cautious of these factors in relation to VIN development and kidney prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"547-557"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144062821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Anticholinergic Burden Scales and Their Association with Cognitive and Functional Impairment in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the REPOSI Database. 老年人抗胆碱能负荷量表的比较及其与认知和功能障碍的关系:使用REPOSI数据库的横断面研究
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-15 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01204-6
Alessio Novella, Marina Azab, Luca Pasina
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing use of anticholinergic medications in older adults with multiple chronic conditions raises significant concerns regarding their cumulative anticholinergic burden, which is linked to several adverse outcomes. This study aimed to compare existing anticholinergic burden scales to identify those most effective at correlating drug-induced anticholinergic load with cognitive and functional impairment. In addition, we proposed a new classification system on the basis of published scales to optimally correlate total anticholinergic burden with observed clinical deficits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the REPOSI registry, which collects clinical and therapeutic information on patients aged 65 years and older admitted to internal medicine and geriatric wards across Italy. Anticholinergic exposure was assessed using 20 established anticholinergic burden scales from literature. In addition, seven experimental scales were developed on the basis of published scales and various mathematical functions (maximum, mode, median, and mean) to evaluate potential differences in measuring anticholinergic load. Outcomes included cognitive impairment, assessed using the Short Blessed Test (SBT), and functional independence, measured by the Barthel Index (BI). A zero-inflated negative binomial model was applied to analyze associations between anticholinergic burden and each outcome. Given the variability in drug scoring across published scales, we developed seven experimental scales using different mathematical functions (maximum, mode, median, and mean) to standardize scoring. Three versions included a null-score adjustment to account for drugs omitted in some scales, ensuring a more comprehensive measure of anticholinergic burden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7735 patients, higher anticholinergic burden was consistently associated with increased cognitive impairment (SBT) and physical dependency (BI) across all existing and proposed scales. The modified Anticholinergic Risk Scale (mARS) scale showed the strongest associations with cognitive (rate ratio [RR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06, 1.13; P < 0.0001) and physical impairment (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11, 1.24; P < 0.0001), indicating an 18% higher risk of dependency per unit increase, while the CRIDECO Anticholinergic Load Scale (CALS) scale exhibited the best model fit. Our newly developed scales confirmed these associations, with the median with null score and the mean with null score scale showing the strongest link to cognitive impairment (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05, 1.09; P < 0.0001) and the strongest association with physical dependency (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08, 1.15; P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Scales that identify a greater proportion of patients with at least one anticholinergic drug may provide a more comprehensive assessment of anticholinergic burden in clinical practice. While no single s
背景:患有多种慢性疾病的老年人越来越多地使用抗胆碱能药物,这引起了对其累积抗胆碱能负担的重大关注,这与几种不良后果有关。本研究旨在比较现有的抗胆碱能负荷量表,以确定哪些量表最有效地将药物诱导的抗胆碱能负荷与认知和功能障碍联系起来。此外,我们提出了一个新的分类系统,以公布的量表为基础,以最佳地将总抗胆碱能负荷与观察到的临床缺陷联系起来。方法:这项横断面研究分析了来自REPOSI登记处的数据,该登记处收集了意大利各地内科和老年病房收治的65岁及以上患者的临床和治疗信息。使用文献中已有的20种抗胆碱能负荷量表对抗胆碱能暴露进行评估。此外,根据已发表的量表和各种数学函数(最大值、众数、中位数和平均值)开发了七个实验量表,以评估测量抗胆碱能负荷的潜在差异。结果包括认知障碍,用短祝福测试(SBT)评估,功能独立性,用Barthel指数(BI)衡量。采用零膨胀负二项模型分析抗胆碱能负荷与各结果之间的关系。考虑到已发表量表中药物评分的可变性,我们开发了七个实验量表,使用不同的数学函数(最大值、模式、中位数和平均值)来标准化评分。三个版本包括一个零分调整,以解释一些量表中遗漏的药物,确保抗胆碱能负担的更全面的测量。结果:在7735例患者中,较高的抗胆碱能负荷在所有现有和拟议的量表中均与认知障碍(SBT)和身体依赖(BI)的增加一致相关。改良的抗胆碱能风险量表(mARS)与认知能力的相关性最强(RR = 1.10, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.06, 1.13;P < 0.0001)和身体损伤(RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11, 1.24;P < 0.0001),表明每单位增加的依赖风险增加18%,而CRIDECO抗胆碱能负荷量表(CALS)表现出最佳的模型拟合。我们新开发的量表证实了这些关联,零分量表的中位数和平均值显示出与认知障碍的最强联系(RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05, 1.09;P < 0.0001),且与身体依赖关系最强(RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08, 1.15;P < 0.0001)。结论:在临床实践中,使用至少一种抗胆碱能药物的患者比例更大的量表可以提供更全面的抗胆碱能负担评估。虽然没有单一的量表在所有结果中显示出明确的优势,但这些量表可以识别有风险的患者。优先使用覆盖范围更广的量表可以加强临床决策,优化老年人多重用药的管理,并认识到其对认知和功能结局的潜在影响。
{"title":"Comparison of Anticholinergic Burden Scales and Their Association with Cognitive and Functional Impairment in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the REPOSI Database.","authors":"Alessio Novella, Marina Azab, Luca Pasina","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01204-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01204-6","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The increasing use of anticholinergic medications in older adults with multiple chronic conditions raises significant concerns regarding their cumulative anticholinergic burden, which is linked to several adverse outcomes. This study aimed to compare existing anticholinergic burden scales to identify those most effective at correlating drug-induced anticholinergic load with cognitive and functional impairment. In addition, we proposed a new classification system on the basis of published scales to optimally correlate total anticholinergic burden with observed clinical deficits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the REPOSI registry, which collects clinical and therapeutic information on patients aged 65 years and older admitted to internal medicine and geriatric wards across Italy. Anticholinergic exposure was assessed using 20 established anticholinergic burden scales from literature. In addition, seven experimental scales were developed on the basis of published scales and various mathematical functions (maximum, mode, median, and mean) to evaluate potential differences in measuring anticholinergic load. Outcomes included cognitive impairment, assessed using the Short Blessed Test (SBT), and functional independence, measured by the Barthel Index (BI). A zero-inflated negative binomial model was applied to analyze associations between anticholinergic burden and each outcome. Given the variability in drug scoring across published scales, we developed seven experimental scales using different mathematical functions (maximum, mode, median, and mean) to standardize scoring. Three versions included a null-score adjustment to account for drugs omitted in some scales, ensuring a more comprehensive measure of anticholinergic burden.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Among 7735 patients, higher anticholinergic burden was consistently associated with increased cognitive impairment (SBT) and physical dependency (BI) across all existing and proposed scales. The modified Anticholinergic Risk Scale (mARS) scale showed the strongest associations with cognitive (rate ratio [RR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06, 1.13; P &lt; 0.0001) and physical impairment (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11, 1.24; P &lt; 0.0001), indicating an 18% higher risk of dependency per unit increase, while the CRIDECO Anticholinergic Load Scale (CALS) scale exhibited the best model fit. Our newly developed scales confirmed these associations, with the median with null score and the mean with null score scale showing the strongest link to cognitive impairment (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05, 1.09; P &lt; 0.0001) and the strongest association with physical dependency (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08, 1.15; P &lt; 0.0001).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Scales that identify a greater proportion of patients with at least one anticholinergic drug may provide a more comprehensive assessment of anticholinergic burden in clinical practice. While no single s","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"559-572"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143983965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence of Self-Reported Adverse Effects to Cannabis by Older Canadians: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. 加拿大老年人自我报告的大麻不良反应患病率:一项横断面分析。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01206-4
Jennifer Bolt, Kristine Lin, Melanie Fenton, Jennifer M Jakobi

Background and objective: Despite the increasing use of cannabis by older Canadians, little is known about cannabis safety in this population, particularly in non-clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to describe the self-reported adverse effects experienced by community-dwelling older Canadians who use cannabis.

Methods: Canadians aged 50 years and older completed an online survey regarding their knowledge, perceptions, and experiences with cannabis. Respondents who reported current cannabis use were asked to report any adverse effects experienced in the past year related to their cannabis use. Adverse effects were categorized, and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to assess predictors of adverse effects.

Results: A total of 1615 older adults completed the survey, of whom 503 reported current use of cannabis and were included in this analysis. Adverse effects were reported by 308 participants (61.2%) and included dry mouth (36.2%), feeling high (25.9%), and adverse effects impacting balance (22.1%) and mental alertness (20.3%). Compared with participants aged 50-60 years, those aged 70 years and older had lower odds of reporting any adverse effects (odds ratio (OR) 0.524, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.303-0.906) or adverse effects impacting mental alertness (OR 0.318, 95% CI 0.172-0.588). Female participants had higher odds of reporting any adverse effect (OR 1.989, 95% CI 1.332-2971) or adverse effects impacting balance (OR 1.930, 95% CI 1.198-3.109).

Conclusions: Adverse effects to cannabis are common amongst community-dwelling older adults. Increased education and guidance regarding adverse effects of cannabis, including the composition and dose of cannabis products, may help increase safe use by this population.

背景和目的:尽管加拿大老年人越来越多地使用大麻,但对这一人群的大麻安全性知之甚少,特别是在非临床环境中。本研究的目的是描述社区居住的加拿大老年人使用大麻所经历的自我报告的不良反应。方法:50岁及以上的加拿大人完成了一项关于他们对大麻的知识、看法和经历的在线调查。要求报告目前使用大麻的答复者报告过去一年中与其使用大麻有关的任何不利影响。对不良反应进行分类,并进行多变量logistic回归来评估不良反应的预测因子。结果:共有1615名老年人完成了调查,其中503人报告目前使用大麻,并被纳入本分析。308名参与者(61.2%)报告了不良反应,包括口干(36.2%)、感觉兴奋(25.9%)、影响平衡(22.1%)和精神警觉(20.3%)的不良反应。与50-60岁的参与者相比,70岁及以上的参与者报告任何不良反应的几率较低(优势比(OR) 0.524, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.303-0.906)或影响精神警觉性的不良反应(OR 0.318, 95% CI 0.172-0.588)。女性参与者报告任何不良反应(OR 1.989, 95% CI 1.332-2971)或影响平衡的不良反应(OR 1.930, 95% CI 1.198-3.109)的几率更高。结论:大麻的不良反应在社区居住的老年人中很常见。加强关于大麻不利影响的教育和指导,包括大麻产品的成分和剂量,可能有助于增加这一人群的安全使用。
{"title":"Prevalence of Self-Reported Adverse Effects to Cannabis by Older Canadians: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.","authors":"Jennifer Bolt, Kristine Lin, Melanie Fenton, Jennifer M Jakobi","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01206-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01206-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Despite the increasing use of cannabis by older Canadians, little is known about cannabis safety in this population, particularly in non-clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to describe the self-reported adverse effects experienced by community-dwelling older Canadians who use cannabis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Canadians aged 50 years and older completed an online survey regarding their knowledge, perceptions, and experiences with cannabis. Respondents who reported current cannabis use were asked to report any adverse effects experienced in the past year related to their cannabis use. Adverse effects were categorized, and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to assess predictors of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1615 older adults completed the survey, of whom 503 reported current use of cannabis and were included in this analysis. Adverse effects were reported by 308 participants (61.2%) and included dry mouth (36.2%), feeling high (25.9%), and adverse effects impacting balance (22.1%) and mental alertness (20.3%). Compared with participants aged 50-60 years, those aged 70 years and older had lower odds of reporting any adverse effects (odds ratio (OR) 0.524, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.303-0.906) or adverse effects impacting mental alertness (OR 0.318, 95% CI 0.172-0.588). Female participants had higher odds of reporting any adverse effect (OR 1.989, 95% CI 1.332-2971) or adverse effects impacting balance (OR 1.930, 95% CI 1.198-3.109).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adverse effects to cannabis are common amongst community-dwelling older adults. Increased education and guidance regarding adverse effects of cannabis, including the composition and dose of cannabis products, may help increase safe use by this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"573-582"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144001392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Age Does not Affect the Efficacy of Antibody Drug Conjugates, But is Associated with High-Grade Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer Enrolled in Early Phase Clinical Trials. 年龄不影响抗体药物偶联物的疗效,但与早期临床试验中癌症患者的高度不良事件相关。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-16 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6
Ana Vaz Ferreira, Matthieu Delaye, Arnaud Pages, Antoine Hollebecque, Anas Gazzah, Rastio Bahleda, Jean-Marie Michot, Francois-Xavier Danlos, Lauren Seknazi, Vincent Goldschmidt, Clémence Hénon, Madonna Sakkal, Cristina Smolenschi, Stéphane Champiat, Aurelien Marabelle, Yohann Loriot, Céline Nagera Lazarovici, Zoé Ap-Thomas, Geoffroy Beraud Chaullet, Santiago Ponce Aix, Christophe Massard, Kaissa Ouali, Maxime Frelaut, Capucine Baldini

Background: Data on the use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in older patients are scarce.

Objective: The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of ADCs used in early phase clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared with younger patients.

Patients and methods: All patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials (phase I or II) of ADCs for solid tumors in our institution between November 2014 and May 2023 were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Safety and efficacy were compared between patients ≥ 65 and < 65 years old (y.o).

Results: A total of 136 patients were included in our study, with 43 (31.6%) patients aged ≥ 65 y.o. In comparison with the younger population, patients aged 65 years or older had similar demographic characteristics. Older patients experienced the same rate of all-grade adverse events (95.3 versus 97.8%) and all-grade related adverse events (65.1 versus 66.7%) but more high-grade adverse events (41.9 versus 30.1%) than younger patients. In the univariate analysis, we identified age, taken as a continuous variable, as associated with high-grade adverse event (p = 0.047). No statistically significant difference was found between older and younger patients in terms of disease control rate (65 versus 54%), median progression-free survival (2.76 months [95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.64-3.75] compared with 2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34), or median overall survival (6.57 months [95% CI 4.01-13.01] compared to 7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65).

Conclusions: In our cohort, ADC therapy provided comparable survival benefits for the older patients but with a higher risk of high-grade adverse event.

背景:关于抗体药物偶联物(adc)在老年患者中的应用的数据很少。目的:目的是研究adc用于≥65岁患者早期临床试验的安全性和有效性,并与年轻患者进行比较。患者和方法:2014年11月至2023年5月在我院参加adc治疗实体瘤早期临床试验(I期或II期)的所有患者纳入本回顾性单中心研究。比较≥65岁和< 65岁患者的安全性和有效性。结果:我们的研究共纳入136例患者,其中43例(31.6%)患者年龄≥65岁。与年轻人群相比,65岁及以上的患者具有相似的人口统计学特征。老年患者的所有级别不良事件发生率(95.3比97.8%)和所有级别相关不良事件发生率(65.1比66.7%)相同,但高级不良事件发生率(41.9比30.1%)高于年轻患者。在单因素分析中,我们确定年龄作为一个连续变量,与严重不良事件相关(p = 0.047)。老年和年轻患者在疾病控制率(65比54%)、中位无进展生存期(2.76个月[95%置信区间,95% CI 1.64-3.75]比2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34)或中位总生存期(6.57个月[95% CI 4.01-13.01]比7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65)方面无统计学差异。结论:在我们的队列中,ADC治疗为老年患者提供了相当的生存益处,但有更高的严重不良事件风险。
{"title":"Age Does not Affect the Efficacy of Antibody Drug Conjugates, But is Associated with High-Grade Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer Enrolled in Early Phase Clinical Trials.","authors":"Ana Vaz Ferreira, Matthieu Delaye, Arnaud Pages, Antoine Hollebecque, Anas Gazzah, Rastio Bahleda, Jean-Marie Michot, Francois-Xavier Danlos, Lauren Seknazi, Vincent Goldschmidt, Clémence Hénon, Madonna Sakkal, Cristina Smolenschi, Stéphane Champiat, Aurelien Marabelle, Yohann Loriot, Céline Nagera Lazarovici, Zoé Ap-Thomas, Geoffroy Beraud Chaullet, Santiago Ponce Aix, Christophe Massard, Kaissa Ouali, Maxime Frelaut, Capucine Baldini","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in older patients are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of ADCs used in early phase clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared with younger patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials (phase I or II) of ADCs for solid tumors in our institution between November 2014 and May 2023 were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Safety and efficacy were compared between patients ≥ 65 and < 65 years old (y.o).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 patients were included in our study, with 43 (31.6%) patients aged ≥ 65 y.o. In comparison with the younger population, patients aged 65 years or older had similar demographic characteristics. Older patients experienced the same rate of all-grade adverse events (95.3 versus 97.8%) and all-grade related adverse events (65.1 versus 66.7%) but more high-grade adverse events (41.9 versus 30.1%) than younger patients. In the univariate analysis, we identified age, taken as a continuous variable, as associated with high-grade adverse event (p = 0.047). No statistically significant difference was found between older and younger patients in terms of disease control rate (65 versus 54%), median progression-free survival (2.76 months [95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.64-3.75] compared with 2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34), or median overall survival (6.57 months [95% CI 4.01-13.01] compared to 7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort, ADC therapy provided comparable survival benefits for the older patients but with a higher risk of high-grade adverse event.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"583-589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144076716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detection of Potential Prescribing Cascades in Multimorbid Older Patients Hospitalised with Acute Illness-An Observational Prospective Prevalence Study. 多病老年急性疾病住院患者潜在处方级联的检测——一项观察性前瞻性患病率研究
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01201-9
Ruth Daunt, Siobhán McGettigan, Lorna Kelly, Denis Curtin, Denis O'Mahony

Background: Prescribing cascades occur when a new drug is prescribed to treat an adverse drug event caused by an existing medication, resulting in unnecessary, or potentially hazardous additional drugs. To date, there are no published studies assessing the prevalence of prescribing cascades in older hospitalised adults.

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of prescribing cascades in hospitalised older adults.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of adults aged ≥ 65 years with multimorbidity and polypharmacy presenting to hospital with acute unselected medical or surgical illness. Prescribing cascades were identified using two predefined validated explicit cascade lists, i.e. ThinkCascades, and a list derived from a recently published systematic review of prescribing cascades in community-dwelling adults, referred to here as the 'Doherty list'. Potential prescribing cascades were classified as 'definite', 'probable', 'possible', 'uncertain' or 'indeterminate' according to pre-specified criteria.

Results: The study included 385 consecutive patients (55.1% female, mean age 80.2 years, standard deviation 7.3 years). A total of 281 potential prescribing cascades (drug A → drug B) were identified in 152 patients (39.4%). Probable or possible prescribing cascades were identified in 48 patients (12.4%) using the Doherty list and in 44 patients (11.4%) using ThinkCascades. Patients exposed to potential prescribing cascades experienced greater levels of polypharmacy than patients not exposed to prescribing cascades (median interquartile range [IQR] of 12 [9-14] daily drugs versus 9 [IQR 7-11], p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Potential prescribing cascades were highly prevalent in older hospitalised adults. Practical tools are needed to assist prescribers in prevention, recognition and management of inappropriate prescribing cascades.

背景:当一种新药被用于治疗由现有药物引起的药物不良事件,导致不必要的或潜在危险的额外药物时,就会发生处方级联。到目前为止,还没有发表的研究评估老年住院成人处方级联的流行程度。目的:调查住院老年人处方级联的发生率。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,研究对象为年龄≥65岁、患有多种疾病和多种药物且因急性未选择的内科或外科疾病而就诊的成年人。处方级联是通过两个预定义的、经过验证的明确级联列表来确定的,即ThinkCascades,以及一个来自最近发表的关于社区居住成人处方级联的系统综述的列表,这里称为“Doherty列表”。根据预先指定的标准,潜在的处方级联被分类为“确定”、“可能”、“可能”、“不确定”或“不确定”。结果:研究纳入385例连续患者,其中女性55.1%,平均年龄80.2岁,标准差7.3岁。152例患者(39.4%)共发现281个潜在处方级联(药物A→药物B)。48例(12.4%)患者使用Doherty列表,44例(11.4%)患者使用ThinkCascades识别出可能的或可能的处方级联。暴露于潜在处方级联反应的患者比未暴露于处方级联反应的患者经历了更大的多药水平(中位数四分位数范围[IQR]为每日12[9-14]种药物对9 [IQR 7-11]种药物,p < 0.001)。结论:潜在的处方级联反应在老年住院成年人中非常普遍。需要实用的工具来帮助开处方者预防、识别和管理不适当的处方级联。
{"title":"Detection of Potential Prescribing Cascades in Multimorbid Older Patients Hospitalised with Acute Illness-An Observational Prospective Prevalence Study.","authors":"Ruth Daunt, Siobhán McGettigan, Lorna Kelly, Denis Curtin, Denis O'Mahony","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01201-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01201-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescribing cascades occur when a new drug is prescribed to treat an adverse drug event caused by an existing medication, resulting in unnecessary, or potentially hazardous additional drugs. To date, there are no published studies assessing the prevalence of prescribing cascades in older hospitalised adults.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the prevalence of prescribing cascades in hospitalised older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study of adults aged ≥ 65 years with multimorbidity and polypharmacy presenting to hospital with acute unselected medical or surgical illness. Prescribing cascades were identified using two predefined validated explicit cascade lists, i.e. ThinkCascades, and a list derived from a recently published systematic review of prescribing cascades in community-dwelling adults, referred to here as the 'Doherty list'. Potential prescribing cascades were classified as 'definite', 'probable', 'possible', 'uncertain' or 'indeterminate' according to pre-specified criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 385 consecutive patients (55.1% female, mean age 80.2 years, standard deviation 7.3 years). A total of 281 potential prescribing cascades (drug A → drug B) were identified in 152 patients (39.4%). Probable or possible prescribing cascades were identified in 48 patients (12.4%) using the Doherty list and in 44 patients (11.4%) using ThinkCascades. Patients exposed to potential prescribing cascades experienced greater levels of polypharmacy than patients not exposed to prescribing cascades (median interquartile range [IQR] of 12 [9-14] daily drugs versus 9 [IQR 7-11], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Potential prescribing cascades were highly prevalent in older hospitalised adults. Practical tools are needed to assist prescribers in prevention, recognition and management of inappropriate prescribing cascades.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"535-546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149247/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143779432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Testosterone Therapy in Older Men: Present and Future Considerations. 老年男性睾酮治疗:现在和未来的考虑。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-27 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01209-1
Bu B Yeap, Cammie Tran, Catherine M Douglass, John J McNeil

Testosterone is the classical male anabolic hormone, involved in sexual development, virilisation and regulation of body composition in adult men. Organic disease involving the hypothalamus, pituitary or testes may interfere with endogenous testosterone production. In such men, testosterone treatment effectively ameliorates symptoms and signs of androgen deficiency. However, non-gonadal factors including age, body mass index and medical comorbidities influence circulating testosterone, and older men have on average lower testosterone concentrations compared with younger men. In these men, testosterone treatment would be a pharmacological intervention requiring stringent justification via high-quality evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Recent RCTs show benefits of testosterone treatment to improve sexual function, anaemia and bone mineral density in older men, and to prevent or revert type 2 diabetes mellitus in men at high risk. Results from a large cardiovascular safety trial in men with or at risk of cardiovascular disease provide important reassurance as to cardiovascular and prostate safety of testosterone treatment. Key questions remain as to whether testosterone's anabolic and other effects can be used safely to counter reductions in lean mass associated with incretin-based weight loss medications in men with obesity, and whether it might prevent disabilities including frailty, osteoporotic fractures and dementia in older men generally. This last question could be answered by a new testosterone RCT, targeting men in the 65-80 years age bracket, which would necessarily be large and of extended duration. A composite endpoint could be used which integrates potential benefits and risks, such as disability-free survival.

睾酮是典型的男性合成代谢激素,参与成年男性的性发育、阳刚之气和身体成分的调节。涉及下丘脑、垂体或睾丸的器质性疾病可干扰内源性睾酮的产生。在这些男性中,睾酮治疗有效地改善了雄激素缺乏的症状和体征。然而,非性腺因素,包括年龄、体重指数和医疗合并症影响循环睾酮,与年轻男性相比,老年男性的平均睾酮浓度较低。在这些男性中,睾酮治疗将是一种药理学干预,需要通过随机对照试验(rct)的高质量证据进行严格的论证。最近的随机对照试验显示,睾酮治疗可改善老年男性的性功能、贫血和骨密度,并可预防或恢复高危男性的2型糖尿病。一项针对患有或有心血管疾病风险的男性的大型心血管安全性试验的结果为睾酮治疗的心血管和前列腺安全性提供了重要的保证。关键的问题仍然是睾酮的合成代谢和其他作用是否可以安全地用于对抗与肠促胰岛素减肥药物相关的肥胖男性瘦质量的减少,以及它是否可以预防包括虚弱在内的残疾,骨质疏松性骨折和老年男性痴呆症。最后一个问题可以通过一项新的睾酮随机对照试验来回答,该试验的目标人群是65-80岁年龄段的男性,这一人群的规模必然很大,持续时间也更长。可以使用综合了潜在益处和风险(如无残疾生存期)的复合终点。
{"title":"Testosterone Therapy in Older Men: Present and Future Considerations.","authors":"Bu B Yeap, Cammie Tran, Catherine M Douglass, John J McNeil","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01209-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01209-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Testosterone is the classical male anabolic hormone, involved in sexual development, virilisation and regulation of body composition in adult men. Organic disease involving the hypothalamus, pituitary or testes may interfere with endogenous testosterone production. In such men, testosterone treatment effectively ameliorates symptoms and signs of androgen deficiency. However, non-gonadal factors including age, body mass index and medical comorbidities influence circulating testosterone, and older men have on average lower testosterone concentrations compared with younger men. In these men, testosterone treatment would be a pharmacological intervention requiring stringent justification via high-quality evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Recent RCTs show benefits of testosterone treatment to improve sexual function, anaemia and bone mineral density in older men, and to prevent or revert type 2 diabetes mellitus in men at high risk. Results from a large cardiovascular safety trial in men with or at risk of cardiovascular disease provide important reassurance as to cardiovascular and prostate safety of testosterone treatment. Key questions remain as to whether testosterone's anabolic and other effects can be used safely to counter reductions in lean mass associated with incretin-based weight loss medications in men with obesity, and whether it might prevent disabilities including frailty, osteoporotic fractures and dementia in older men generally. This last question could be answered by a new testosterone RCT, targeting men in the 65-80 years age bracket, which would necessarily be large and of extended duration. A composite endpoint could be used which integrates potential benefits and risks, such as disability-free survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"501-512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148964/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143971884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combination Pharmacotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Evaluation of Existing Literature on Combination Therapies for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with BPH. 联合药物治疗良性前列腺增生:联合治疗与BPH相关的下尿路症状的现有文献评价
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01198-1
Joséphine Papet, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Hugo Dupuis

Objective: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) significantly impact quality of life in aging men. While monotherapies, including alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI), or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), are widely used, the potential benefits and risks of combination pharmacotherapies remain less well-documented. This study reviews and assesses the current evidence regarding the use of combination pharmacotherapies in the management of BPH-related LUTS to provide a comprehensive overview of their efficacy and safety profiles.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to June 2024. Studies were selected on the basis of predefined inclusion criteria, focusing on clinical outcomes such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urinary flow rate (Qmax), and quality of life. Data from 22 eligible studies were analyzed and summarized.

Results: Combination therapies, particularly those involving alpha-blockers and 5-ARI, demonstrated significant reductions in clinical progression, improvements in urinary flow, and symptom relief compared with monotherapies. Therapies combining alpha-blockers with anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or phytotherapeutic agents showed potential for targeting mixed symptoms, though evidence remains limited. Triple therapy studies are scarce, with benefits observed only in highly symptomatic or refractory cases.

Conclusions: Combination therapies for LUTS/BPH offer superior efficacy over monotherapy in certain cases, particularly with alpha-blockers and 5-ARI, which significantly reduce disease progression and symptoms. Other combinations, including alpha-blockers with anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or PDE5 inhibitors, provide potential benefits for patients with mixed symptom profiles, though evidence remains heterogeneous. The level of evidence among studies varies significantly, ranging from high-quality RCTs to lower-level observational data, requiring careful interpretation. While combination treatments improve outcomes, they also present challenges in adherence and side effects. A personalized and evidence-based approach is essential to optimize treatment selection and balance efficacy with tolerability.

目的:与良性前列腺增生(BPH)相关的下尿路症状(LUTS)显著影响老年男性的生活质量。虽然包括α受体阻滞剂、5- α还原酶抑制剂(5- ari)或磷酸二酯酶5型抑制剂(PDE5i)在内的单一疗法被广泛使用,但联合药物治疗的潜在益处和风险仍未得到充分证明。本研究回顾和评估了目前关于在bph相关LUTS管理中使用联合药物治疗的证据,以提供其疗效和安全性概况的全面概述。方法:在PubMed中检索文献,包括截至2024年6月发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)。根据预先确定的纳入标准选择研究,重点关注临床结果,如国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、尿流率(Qmax)和生活质量。分析和总结了22项符合条件的研究的数据。结果:与单一治疗相比,联合治疗,特别是涉及α -受体阻滞剂和5-ARI的联合治疗,在临床进展、尿流改善和症状缓解方面表现出显著的减少。α -受体阻滞剂联合抗胆碱能药、β -3激动剂或植物治疗剂的治疗显示出针对混合症状的潜力,尽管证据仍然有限。三联疗法的研究很少,仅在症状严重或难治性病例中观察到益处。结论:在某些情况下,联合治疗LUTS/BPH的疗效优于单药治疗,特别是与α受体阻滞剂和5-ARI联合治疗,可显著减少疾病进展和症状。其他联合治疗,包括α -受体阻滞剂联合抗胆碱能药、β -3激动剂或PDE5抑制剂,对混合症状的患者有潜在的益处,尽管证据仍然不一致。研究之间的证据水平差异很大,从高质量的随机对照试验到低水平的观察数据,需要仔细解释。虽然联合治疗改善了结果,但它们也在依从性和副作用方面提出了挑战。个性化和基于证据的方法对于优化治疗选择和平衡疗效与耐受性至关重要。
{"title":"Combination Pharmacotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Evaluation of Existing Literature on Combination Therapies for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with BPH.","authors":"Joséphine Papet, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Hugo Dupuis","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01198-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01198-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) significantly impact quality of life in aging men. While monotherapies, including alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI), or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), are widely used, the potential benefits and risks of combination pharmacotherapies remain less well-documented. This study reviews and assesses the current evidence regarding the use of combination pharmacotherapies in the management of BPH-related LUTS to provide a comprehensive overview of their efficacy and safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in PubMed, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to June 2024. Studies were selected on the basis of predefined inclusion criteria, focusing on clinical outcomes such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urinary flow rate (Q<sub>max</sub>), and quality of life. Data from 22 eligible studies were analyzed and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combination therapies, particularly those involving alpha-blockers and 5-ARI, demonstrated significant reductions in clinical progression, improvements in urinary flow, and symptom relief compared with monotherapies. Therapies combining alpha-blockers with anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or phytotherapeutic agents showed potential for targeting mixed symptoms, though evidence remains limited. Triple therapy studies are scarce, with benefits observed only in highly symptomatic or refractory cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination therapies for LUTS/BPH offer superior efficacy over monotherapy in certain cases, particularly with alpha-blockers and 5-ARI, which significantly reduce disease progression and symptoms. Other combinations, including alpha-blockers with anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or PDE5 inhibitors, provide potential benefits for patients with mixed symptom profiles, though evidence remains heterogeneous. The level of evidence among studies varies significantly, ranging from high-quality RCTs to lower-level observational data, requiring careful interpretation. While combination treatments improve outcomes, they also present challenges in adherence and side effects. A personalized and evidence-based approach is essential to optimize treatment selection and balance efficacy with tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"527-534"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143964392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Aging Patient with Cystic Fibrosis. 老年囊性纤维化患者。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01207-3
Lauren J Sullivan, Christina M Mingora, Patrick A Flume

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited condition that leads to multiorgan dysfunction, especially in the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and reproductive tracts, with associated conditions including persistent pulmonary infection, liver disease, pancreatic insufficiency, and infertility. Historically, people with CF (pwCF) suffered a shortened lifespan due to complications of the condition, namely respiratory. The emphasis on center-based, multidisciplinary care and the widespread introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy has resulted in pwCF living longer and healthier lives. Now they may encounter some of the health and social issues associated with growing older, which previously were not a typical experience for this population. In this article, we review relevant health issues for the aging CF population, including complications that arise from the condition itself, issues encountered due to treatment, and general conditions associated with aging that may manifest earlier or differently in pwCF. We discuss the recommendations for screening and treatment of relevant conditions, and considerations for the integration of healthcare professionals across disciplines into the care of this population.

囊性纤维化(CF)是一种遗传性疾病,可导致多器官功能障碍,尤其是呼吸道、胃肠道和生殖道,并伴有持续性肺部感染、肝脏疾病、胰腺功能不全和不孕症。从历史上看,患有CF (pwCF)的人由于疾病的并发症,即呼吸系统,寿命缩短。强调以中心为基础的多学科护理和广泛引入囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节剂(CFTR)调节剂治疗,使pwCF活得更长、更健康。现在,他们可能会遇到一些与年龄增长有关的健康和社会问题,而这些问题在以前对这一人群来说并不常见。在本文中,我们回顾了老龄CF人群的相关健康问题,包括由疾病本身引起的并发症、因治疗而遇到的问题,以及与衰老相关的一般疾病,这些疾病可能在pwCF中表现得更早或不同。我们讨论了筛查和治疗相关条件的建议,并考虑将跨学科的医疗保健专业人员整合到这一人群的护理中。
{"title":"The Aging Patient with Cystic Fibrosis.","authors":"Lauren J Sullivan, Christina M Mingora, Patrick A Flume","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01207-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01207-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited condition that leads to multiorgan dysfunction, especially in the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and reproductive tracts, with associated conditions including persistent pulmonary infection, liver disease, pancreatic insufficiency, and infertility. Historically, people with CF (pwCF) suffered a shortened lifespan due to complications of the condition, namely respiratory. The emphasis on center-based, multidisciplinary care and the widespread introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy has resulted in pwCF living longer and healthier lives. Now they may encounter some of the health and social issues associated with growing older, which previously were not a typical experience for this population. In this article, we review relevant health issues for the aging CF population, including complications that arise from the condition itself, issues encountered due to treatment, and general conditions associated with aging that may manifest earlier or differently in pwCF. We discuss the recommendations for screening and treatment of relevant conditions, and considerations for the integration of healthcare professionals across disciplines into the care of this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"513-525"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148974/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143982578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Benefit-Risk Assessment of Rivaroxaban in Older Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation or Venous Thromboembolism. 利伐沙班治疗老年非瓣膜性房颤或静脉血栓栓塞患者的获益-风险评估
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01192-7
Paul P Dobesh, Albert A Volkl, Ákos Ferenc Pap, C V Damaraju, Bennett Levitan, Zhong Yuan, Alpesh N Amin

Background: Both bleeding and adverse ischemic events increase with age, compounding the benefit-risk balance of anticoagulants in older patients. We present analyses using benefit-risk methods to better understand the age-dependence of the benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Methods: Randomized controlled trial data from the ROCKET-AF (NVAF) and EINSTEIN DVT, EINSTEIN PE, EINSTEIN-Extension, and EINSTEIN CHOICE in (VTE) were used. For ROCKET-AF, benefits and risks were assessed with incidence rates for key thrombotic and bleeding endpoints and a net clinical benefit (NCB) measure. Cumulative incidences (estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method) were estimated at day 185 for EINSTEIN and EINSTEIN Extension and 1 year for EINSTEIN CHOICE. Incidence differences were calculated for the overall population and age subgroups of < 65, 65-75, and > 75 years.

Results: In ROCKET-AF, rate differences in the composite NCB outcome (vascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, fatal bleeding, critical organ bleeding, and non-CNS systemic embolism) favored rivaroxaban overall and by age < 65, 65-75, and > 75 years (-84, -25, -61, and -150 cases per 10,000 patient-years, respectively). In the pooled EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies, cumulative incidence differences for the composite NCB outcome (recurrent VTE and major bleeding) were -103, 3, -105, and -544 per 10,000 patients, respectively. For extended VTE treatment with rivaroxaban versus placebo in EINSTEIN-Extension, NCB results were -536, -492, -556, and -601 per 10,000 patients, respectively. In the EINSTEIN CHOICE analysis, NCB favored rivaroxaban 20 mg versus aspirin (-284, -255, -339, and -338, respectively) and rivaroxaban 10 mg versus aspirin (-339, -328, -485, and -80, respectively).

Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated a positive benefit-risk profile with rivaroxaban versus trial comparators in older patients with NVAF or VTE, with benefit-risk increasingly favoring rivaroxaban with increasing age.

Clinical trial registration: http://ClinicalTrials.gov , identifiers: NCT00403767 (ROCKET-AF), NCT00440193 (EINSTEIN DVT), NCT00439777 (EINSTEIN PE), NCT00439725 (EINSTEIN Extension), and NCT02064439 (EINSTEIN CHOICE).

背景:出血和缺血性不良事件都随着年龄的增长而增加,这使得老年患者使用抗凝剂的获益-风险平衡更加复杂。为了更好地了解利伐沙班对非瓣膜性房颤(NVAF)或静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)患者的获益-风险特征的年龄依赖性,我们采用获益-风险方法进行了分析。方法:采用ROCKET-AF (NVAF)与EINSTEIN DVT、EINSTEIN PE、EINSTEIN- extension、EINSTEIN CHOICE in (VTE)的随机对照试验数据。对于ROCKET-AF,通过关键血栓和出血终点的发生率和净临床获益(NCB)指标来评估获益和风险。累积发病率(通过Kaplan-Meier方法估计)在EINSTEIN和EINSTEIN Extension的185天估计,而EINSTEIN CHOICE的1年估计。计算总体人群和年龄亚组< 65岁、65-75岁和75岁以下人群的发病率差异。结果:在ROCKET-AF中,综合NCB结局(血管性死亡、卒中、心肌梗死、致死性出血、危重器官出血和非中枢神经系统系统性栓塞)的比率差异总体上和年龄< 65岁、65-75岁和75岁(分别为-84、-25、-61和-150例/ 10,000患者年)有利于利伐沙班。在汇总的EINSTEIN DVT和EINSTEIN PE研究中,复合NCB结局(复发性静脉血栓栓塞和大出血)的累积发生率差异分别为-103、3、-105和-544 / 10000例患者。在EINSTEIN-Extension中,利伐沙班与安慰剂延长静脉血栓栓塞治疗,NCB结果分别为-536、-492、-556和-601 / 10000例患者。在EINSTEIN CHOICE分析中,NCB倾向于利伐沙班20mg vs阿司匹林(分别为-284、-255、-339和-338),利伐沙班10mg vs阿司匹林(分别为-339、-328、-485和-80)。结论:该分析表明,在老年非瓣膜性房颤或静脉血栓栓塞患者中,利伐沙班与试验比较物的获益-风险比为正,随着年龄的增长,利伐沙班的获益-风险比越来越有利。临床试验注册:http://ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT00403767 (ROCKET-AF)、NCT00440193 (EINSTEIN DVT)、NCT00439777 (EINSTEIN PE)、NCT00439725 (EINSTEIN Extension)、NCT02064439 (EINSTEIN CHOICE)。
{"title":"Benefit-Risk Assessment of Rivaroxaban in Older Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation or Venous Thromboembolism.","authors":"Paul P Dobesh, Albert A Volkl, Ákos Ferenc Pap, C V Damaraju, Bennett Levitan, Zhong Yuan, Alpesh N Amin","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01192-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01192-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both bleeding and adverse ischemic events increase with age, compounding the benefit-risk balance of anticoagulants in older patients. We present analyses using benefit-risk methods to better understand the age-dependence of the benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trial data from the ROCKET-AF (NVAF) and EINSTEIN DVT, EINSTEIN PE, EINSTEIN-Extension, and EINSTEIN CHOICE in (VTE) were used. For ROCKET-AF, benefits and risks were assessed with incidence rates for key thrombotic and bleeding endpoints and a net clinical benefit (NCB) measure. Cumulative incidences (estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method) were estimated at day 185 for EINSTEIN and EINSTEIN Extension and 1 year for EINSTEIN CHOICE. Incidence differences were calculated for the overall population and age subgroups of < 65, 65-75, and > 75 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In ROCKET-AF, rate differences in the composite NCB outcome (vascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, fatal bleeding, critical organ bleeding, and non-CNS systemic embolism) favored rivaroxaban overall and by age < 65, 65-75, and > 75 years (-84, -25, -61, and -150 cases per 10,000 patient-years, respectively). In the pooled EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies, cumulative incidence differences for the composite NCB outcome (recurrent VTE and major bleeding) were -103, 3, -105, and -544 per 10,000 patients, respectively. For extended VTE treatment with rivaroxaban versus placebo in EINSTEIN-Extension, NCB results were -536, -492, -556, and -601 per 10,000 patients, respectively. In the EINSTEIN CHOICE analysis, NCB favored rivaroxaban 20 mg versus aspirin (-284, -255, -339, and -338, respectively) and rivaroxaban 10 mg versus aspirin (-339, -328, -485, and -80, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis demonstrated a positive benefit-risk profile with rivaroxaban versus trial comparators in older patients with NVAF or VTE, with benefit-risk increasingly favoring rivaroxaban with increasing age.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>http://ClinicalTrials.gov , identifiers: NCT00403767 (ROCKET-AF), NCT00440193 (EINSTEIN DVT), NCT00439777 (EINSTEIN PE), NCT00439725 (EINSTEIN Extension), and NCT02064439 (EINSTEIN CHOICE).</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"469-484"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053352/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143751588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Drugs & Aging
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1