首页 > 最新文献

Drugs & Aging最新文献

英文 中文
Central Nervous System Medications: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations for Older Adults. 中枢神经系统药物:中枢神经系统药物:老年人的药代动力学和药效学考虑因素》(Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations for Older Adults)。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01117-w
Naomi Gronich

Most drugs have not been evaluated in the older population. Recognizing physiological alterations associated with changes in drug disposition and with the ultimate effect, especially in central nervous system-acting drugs, is fundamental. While considering pharmacokinetics, it should be noted that the absorption of most drugs from the gastrointestinal tract does not change in advanced age. There are only few data about the effect of age on the transdermal absorption of medications such as fentanyl. Absorption from an intramuscular injection may be similar in older adults as in younger patients. The distribution of lipophilic drugs (such as diazepam) is increased owing to a relative increase in the percentage of body fat, causing drug accumulation and prolonged drug elimination following cessation. Phase I drug biotransformation is variably decreased in aging, impacting elimination, and hepatic drug clearance has been shown to decrease in older individuals by 10-40% for most drugs studied. Lower doses of phenothiazines, butyrophenones, atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants (citalopram, mirtazapine, and tricyclic antidepressants), and benzodiazepines (such as diazepam) achieve the same extent of exposure. For renally cleared drugs with no prior metabolism (such as gabapentin), the glomerular filtration rate appropriately estimates drug clearance. Important pharmacodynamic changes in older adults include an increased sedative effect of benzodiazepines at a given drug exposure, and a higher sensitivity to mu opiate receptor agonists and to opioid adverse effects. Artificial intelligence, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation, and concentration-effect modeling enabling a differentiation between the pharmacokinetic and the pharmacodynamic effects of aging might help to close some of the gaps in knowledge.

大多数药物尚未在老年人群中进行过评估。认识与药物处置和最终疗效变化有关的生理变化,尤其是对中枢神经系统作用药物的生理变化,是非常重要的。在考虑药代动力学时,应注意到大多数药物从胃肠道的吸收在高龄时并无变化。关于年龄对芬太尼等药物透皮吸收的影响,目前只有很少的数据。老年人从肌肉注射中吸收药物的情况可能与年轻患者相似。由于体内脂肪比例相对增加,亲脂性药物(如地西泮)的分布会增加,导致药物蓄积,并在停药后延长药物排出时间。药物的第一阶段生物转化在衰老过程中会出现不同程度的降低,从而影响药物的消除,研究表明,对于大多数药物而言,老年人的肝脏药物清除率会降低 10%-40%。较低剂量的吩噻嗪类、丁酰苯丙酮类、非典型抗精神病药、抗抑郁药(西酞普兰、米氮平和三环类抗抑郁药)和苯二氮卓类(如地西泮)可达到相同的暴露程度。对于未经事先代谢的肾清除药物(如加巴喷丁),肾小球滤过率可适当估计药物清除率。老年人重要的药效学变化包括:在给定的药物暴露量下,苯二氮卓类药物的镇静作用增强,对μ阿片受体激动剂和阿片类药物不良反应的敏感性提高。人工智能、以生理为基础的药代动力学建模和模拟以及浓度效应建模可区分衰老的药代动力学效应和药效学效应,这可能有助于填补一些知识空白。
{"title":"Central Nervous System Medications: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations for Older Adults.","authors":"Naomi Gronich","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01117-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-024-01117-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most drugs have not been evaluated in the older population. Recognizing physiological alterations associated with changes in drug disposition and with the ultimate effect, especially in central nervous system-acting drugs, is fundamental. While considering pharmacokinetics, it should be noted that the absorption of most drugs from the gastrointestinal tract does not change in advanced age. There are only few data about the effect of age on the transdermal absorption of medications such as fentanyl. Absorption from an intramuscular injection may be similar in older adults as in younger patients. The distribution of lipophilic drugs (such as diazepam) is increased owing to a relative increase in the percentage of body fat, causing drug accumulation and prolonged drug elimination following cessation. Phase I drug biotransformation is variably decreased in aging, impacting elimination, and hepatic drug clearance has been shown to decrease in older individuals by 10-40% for most drugs studied. Lower doses of phenothiazines, butyrophenones, atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants (citalopram, mirtazapine, and tricyclic antidepressants), and benzodiazepines (such as diazepam) achieve the same extent of exposure. For renally cleared drugs with no prior metabolism (such as gabapentin), the glomerular filtration rate appropriately estimates drug clearance. Important pharmacodynamic changes in older adults include an increased sedative effect of benzodiazepines at a given drug exposure, and a higher sensitivity to mu opiate receptor agonists and to opioid adverse effects. Artificial intelligence, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation, and concentration-effect modeling enabling a differentiation between the pharmacokinetic and the pharmacodynamic effects of aging might help to close some of the gaps in knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"507-519"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193826/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141175138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationship Between Frailty and Diabetic Pharmacologic Therapy in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. 2 型糖尿病老年患者体弱与糖尿病药物治疗之间的关系:一项横断面研究
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-25 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01119-8
Akiko Nishimura, Chie Masuda, Chiyo Murauchi, Miho Ishii, Yuko Murata, Terumi Kawasaki, Mayumi Azuma, Shin-Ichi Harashima

Background: Older adults with diabetes mellitus require drug treatment considering their frailty, cognitive function, and hypoglycemia.

Objective: We investigated the association between diabetic pharmacologic therapy and both diabetic complications and frailty across eight diabetes-specific outpatient clinics nationwide.

Methods: Participants (aged 60-80 years) who had type 2 diabetes and did not require nursing care were included in the study. Basic attributes, patient background, complications, hypoglycemic status, body weight, body composition, blood tests, grip strength, and Kihon Checklist (a frailty index) and self-care scores were obtained. Descriptive statistics, t-test, chi-square test, and regression analyses were employed for evaluation.

Results: Overall, 417 participants were included (224 men, 193 women, mean age 70.1 ± 5.4 years, diabetes duration 14.9 ± 10.9 years, body mass index 24.5 ± 3.8, glycated hemoglobin 7.22 ± 0.98%, proportion of individuals with frailty and prefrailty, 19.9% and 41.0%, respectively). All drugs were used more frequently in prefrailty conditions. Each diabetes medication was related to complications, body composition, and frailty, as follows: sulfonylurea (lower hypoglycemia); glinide (severe hypoglycemia, retinopathy, weaker grip strength, high Kihon Checklist score, decreased physical activities); alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (no association); biguanide (high body mass index, high body fat, stronger grip strength); thiazolidinedione (decreased instrumental activities of daily living); dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (no association); sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; retinopathy, high body mass index and Kihon Checklist score, and depressive mood); glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (high body mass index and body fat and poor nutritional status); and insulin preparations (hypoglycemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, cardiovascular diseases, weaker grip strength, and high Kihon Checklist score and physical inactivity).

Conclusions: Some formulations, such as glinide, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and insulin, are associated with an increased frequency of frailty, warranting careful and individualized diabetes treatment.

背景:患有糖尿病的老年人需要药物治疗:老年糖尿病患者需要药物治疗,这要考虑到他们的虚弱程度、认知功能和低血糖问题:我们调查了全国 8 个糖尿病专科门诊中糖尿病药物治疗与糖尿病并发症和虚弱之间的关系:研究对象包括不需要护理的 2 型糖尿病患者(60-80 岁)。获得基本属性、患者背景、并发症、低血糖状态、体重、身体成分、血液检查、握力、Kihon 检查表(一种虚弱指数)和自我护理评分。评估采用了描述性统计、t 检验、卡方检验和回归分析:共纳入 417 名参与者(男性 224 人,女性 193 人,平均年龄(70.1 ± 5.4)岁,糖尿病病程(14.9 ± 10.9)年,体重指数(24.5 ± 3.8),糖化血红蛋白(7.22 ± 0.98%),虚弱和虚弱前期患者比例分别为 19.9% 和 41.0%)。所有药物在虚弱前期的使用频率都较高。每种糖尿病药物与并发症、身体成分和虚弱程度的关系如下:磺脲类(低血糖发生率较低);格列奈类(严重低血糖、视网膜病变、握力减弱、Kihon 检查表评分高、体力活动减少);α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂(无关联);双胍类(体重指数高、体脂高、握力增强);噻唑烷二酮类(日常生活工具活动减少);二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(无关联);胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(高体重指数、高体脂和营养状况差);胰岛素制剂(低血糖、视网膜病变、神经病变、肾病、心血管疾病、握力减弱、高 Kihon 检查表评分和缺乏运动)。结论某些制剂,如格列奈、钠-葡萄糖共转运体 2 抑制剂和胰岛素,与体弱频率增加有关,因此应谨慎进行个体化糖尿病治疗。
{"title":"Relationship Between Frailty and Diabetic Pharmacologic Therapy in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Akiko Nishimura, Chie Masuda, Chiyo Murauchi, Miho Ishii, Yuko Murata, Terumi Kawasaki, Mayumi Azuma, Shin-Ichi Harashima","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01119-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-024-01119-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with diabetes mellitus require drug treatment considering their frailty, cognitive function, and hypoglycemia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the association between diabetic pharmacologic therapy and both diabetic complications and frailty across eight diabetes-specific outpatient clinics nationwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (aged 60-80 years) who had type 2 diabetes and did not require nursing care were included in the study. Basic attributes, patient background, complications, hypoglycemic status, body weight, body composition, blood tests, grip strength, and Kihon Checklist (a frailty index) and self-care scores were obtained. Descriptive statistics, t-test, chi-square test, and regression analyses were employed for evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 417 participants were included (224 men, 193 women, mean age 70.1 ± 5.4 years, diabetes duration 14.9 ± 10.9 years, body mass index 24.5 ± 3.8, glycated hemoglobin 7.22 ± 0.98%, proportion of individuals with frailty and prefrailty, 19.9% and 41.0%, respectively). All drugs were used more frequently in prefrailty conditions. Each diabetes medication was related to complications, body composition, and frailty, as follows: sulfonylurea (lower hypoglycemia); glinide (severe hypoglycemia, retinopathy, weaker grip strength, high Kihon Checklist score, decreased physical activities); alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (no association); biguanide (high body mass index, high body fat, stronger grip strength); thiazolidinedione (decreased instrumental activities of daily living); dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (no association); sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; retinopathy, high body mass index and Kihon Checklist score, and depressive mood); glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (high body mass index and body fat and poor nutritional status); and insulin preparations (hypoglycemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, cardiovascular diseases, weaker grip strength, and high Kihon Checklist score and physical inactivity).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some formulations, such as glinide, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and insulin, are associated with an increased frequency of frailty, warranting careful and individualized diabetes treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"531-542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193829/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141097149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations Between Midlife Anticholinergic Medication Use and Subsequent Cognitive Decline: A British Birth Cohort Study. 中年期使用抗胆碱能药物与随后认知能力下降之间的关系:英国出生队列研究
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01116-x
Mark J Rawle, Wallis C Y Lau, Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Praveetha Patalay, Marcus Richards, Daniel Davis

Background: Anticholinergic medication use is associated with cognitive decline and incident dementia. Our study, a prospective birth cohort analysis, aimed to determine if repeated exposure to anticholinergic medications was associated with greater decline, and whether decline was reversed with medication reduction.

Methods: From the Medical Research Council (MRC) National Survey of Health and Development, a British birth cohort with all participants born in a single week of March 1946, we quantified anticholinergic exposure between ages 53 and 69 years using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACBS). We used multinomial regression to estimate associations with global cognition, quantified by the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, 3rd Edition (ACE-III). Longitudinal associations between ACBS and cognitive test results (Verbal memory quantified by the Word Learning Test [WLT], and processing speed quantified by the Timed Letter Search Task [TLST]) at three time points (age 53, 60-64 and 69) were assessed using mixed and fixed effects linear regression models. Analyses were adjusted for sex, childhood cognition, education, chronic disease count and severity, and mental health symptoms.

Results: Anticholinergic exposure was associated cross-sectionally with lower ACE-III scores at age 69, with the greatest effects in those with high exposure at ages 60-64 (mean difference - 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 3.51 to - 1.17). Longitudinally, both mild-moderate and high ACBS scores were linked to lower WLT scores, again with high exposure showing larger effects (mean difference with contemporaneous exposure - 0.90, 95% CI - 1.63 to - 0.17; mean difference with lagged exposure - 1.53, 95% CI - 2.43 to - 0.64). Associations remained in fixed effects models (mean difference with contemporaneous exposure -1.78, 95% CI -2.85 to - 0.71; mean difference with lagged exposure - 2.23, 95% CI - 3.33 to - 1.13). Associations with TLST were noted only in isolated contemporaneous exposure (mean difference - 13.14, 95% CI - 19.04 to - 7.23; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Anticholinergic exposure throughout mid and later life was associated with lower cognitive function. Reduced processing speed was associated only with contemporaneous anticholinergic medication use, and not historical use. Associations with lower verbal recall were evident with both historical and contemporaneous use of anticholinergic medication, and associations with historical use persisted in individuals even when their anticholinergic medication use decreased over the course of the study.

背景:使用抗胆碱能药物与认知能力下降和痴呆症的发生有关。我们的研究是一项前瞻性出生队列分析,旨在确定反复服用抗胆碱能药物是否会导致认知能力下降,以及减少用药是否会逆转认知能力下降:医学研究委员会(MRC)全国健康与发展调查是英国的一项出生队列调查,所有参与者均出生于1946年3月的一个星期。我们使用多项式回归法来估计与全球认知能力的关系,并通过第三版阿登布鲁认知检查(ACE-III)进行量化。我们使用混合效应和固定效应线性回归模型评估了 ACBS 与三个时间点(53 岁、60-64 岁和 69 岁)的认知测试结果(通过单词学习测试 [WLT] 量化的言语记忆和通过定时字母搜索任务 [TLST] 量化的处理速度)之间的纵向联系。分析对性别、儿童认知能力、教育程度、慢性疾病数量和严重程度以及心理健康症状进行了调整:抗胆碱能暴露与69岁时较低的ACE-III评分有关,对60-64岁时暴露程度高的人影响最大(平均差异-2.34,95%置信区间[CI]-3.51至-1.17)。纵向来看,轻度-中度和高度 ACBS 得分都与较低的 WLT 得分有关,同样是高度暴露显示出更大的影响(同期暴露的平均差异 - 0.90,95% CI - 1.63 至 - 0.17;滞后暴露的平均差异 - 1.53,95% CI - 2.43 至 - 0.64)。在固定效应模型中仍存在相关性(与同期暴露的平均差异为-1.78,95% CI为-2.85至-0.71;与滞后暴露的平均差异为-2.23,95% CI为-3.33至-1.13)。只有在孤立的同期暴露中,才发现与 TLST 存在关联(平均差 - 13.14,95% CI - 19.04 至 - 7.23;P 结论:在中晚年时期接触抗胆碱能药物与认知功能降低有关。处理速度降低仅与当时使用抗胆碱能药物有关,而与历史使用无关。抗胆碱能药物的历史使用和当时使用都会导致言语回忆能力下降,即使在研究期间抗胆碱能药物的使用量有所下降,但与历史使用的关联仍然存在。
{"title":"Associations Between Midlife Anticholinergic Medication Use and Subsequent Cognitive Decline: A British Birth Cohort Study.","authors":"Mark J Rawle, Wallis C Y Lau, Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Praveetha Patalay, Marcus Richards, Daniel Davis","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01116-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-024-01116-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anticholinergic medication use is associated with cognitive decline and incident dementia. Our study, a prospective birth cohort analysis, aimed to determine if repeated exposure to anticholinergic medications was associated with greater decline, and whether decline was reversed with medication reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the Medical Research Council (MRC) National Survey of Health and Development, a British birth cohort with all participants born in a single week of March 1946, we quantified anticholinergic exposure between ages 53 and 69 years using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACBS). We used multinomial regression to estimate associations with global cognition, quantified by the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, 3<sup>rd</sup> Edition (ACE-III). Longitudinal associations between ACBS and cognitive test results (Verbal memory quantified by the Word Learning Test [WLT], and processing speed quantified by the Timed Letter Search Task [TLST]) at three time points (age 53, 60-64 and 69) were assessed using mixed and fixed effects linear regression models. Analyses were adjusted for sex, childhood cognition, education, chronic disease count and severity, and mental health symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anticholinergic exposure was associated cross-sectionally with lower ACE-III scores at age 69, with the greatest effects in those with high exposure at ages 60-64 (mean difference - 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 3.51 to - 1.17). Longitudinally, both mild-moderate and high ACBS scores were linked to lower WLT scores, again with high exposure showing larger effects (mean difference with contemporaneous exposure - 0.90, 95% CI - 1.63 to - 0.17; mean difference with lagged exposure - 1.53, 95% CI - 2.43 to - 0.64). Associations remained in fixed effects models (mean difference with contemporaneous exposure -1.78, 95% CI -2.85 to - 0.71; mean difference with lagged exposure - 2.23, 95% CI - 3.33 to - 1.13). Associations with TLST were noted only in isolated contemporaneous exposure (mean difference - 13.14, 95% CI - 19.04 to - 7.23; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anticholinergic exposure throughout mid and later life was associated with lower cognitive function. Reduced processing speed was associated only with contemporaneous anticholinergic medication use, and not historical use. Associations with lower verbal recall were evident with both historical and contemporaneous use of anticholinergic medication, and associations with historical use persisted in individuals even when their anticholinergic medication use decreased over the course of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"543-554"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140916310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rho Kinase Inhibitors: Strategies in Glaucoma Treatment in Older Adults. Rho 激酶抑制剂:老年人青光眼治疗策略。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01107-y
Emily Schehlein, Alan Robin

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness which preferentially affects older individuals. No medications or therapies which are currently in our arsenal actually treat glaucoma itself. We know that intraocular pressure (IOP) is currently the only modifiable risk factor for glaucoma. The primary treatments for glaucoma include medications, laser therapies, and surgical therapies. The Rho kinase inhibitors are the newest class of medications currently on the market and in development for topical IOP-lowering therapy. Studies have shown their ability to lower eye pressure individually and in combination with other medications. Their ability to potentially provide neuroprotective effects for disease modification also gives this class exciting potential for glaucoma treatment.

青光眼是导致不可逆转性失明的主要原因之一,它主要影响老年人。目前,我们的药物库中没有任何一种药物或疗法能够真正治疗青光眼本身。我们知道,眼压(IOP)是目前唯一可改变的青光眼风险因素。青光眼的主要治疗方法包括药物、激光疗法和手术疗法。Rho 激酶抑制剂是目前市场上最新的一类药物,也是正在研发中的局部降眼压疗法。研究表明,它们能够单独或与其他药物联合使用降低眼压。它们还具有潜在的神经保护作用,可以改变疾病,这也为该类药物治疗青光眼提供了令人兴奋的潜力。
{"title":"Rho Kinase Inhibitors: Strategies in Glaucoma Treatment in Older Adults.","authors":"Emily Schehlein, Alan Robin","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01107-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-024-01107-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness which preferentially affects older individuals. No medications or therapies which are currently in our arsenal actually treat glaucoma itself. We know that intraocular pressure (IOP) is currently the only modifiable risk factor for glaucoma. The primary treatments for glaucoma include medications, laser therapies, and surgical therapies. The Rho kinase inhibitors are the newest class of medications currently on the market and in development for topical IOP-lowering therapy. Studies have shown their ability to lower eye pressure individually and in combination with other medications. Their ability to potentially provide neuroprotective effects for disease modification also gives this class exciting potential for glaucoma treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"399-406"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139982657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Toxicity in Older Patients with Cancer Receiving Immunotherapy: An Observational Study. 接受免疫疗法的老年癌症患者的毒性:一项观察性研究
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01114-z
Estelle Tran Van Hoi, Stella Trompet, Yara Van Holstein, Frederiek Van Den Bos, Diana Van Heemst, Henrik Codrington, Geert Labots, Suzanne Lohman, Asli Ozkan, Johanneke Portielje, Simon P Mooijaart, Nienke A De Glas, Marloes Derks

Background: Checkpoint inhibition has emerged as an effective treatment strategy for a variety of cancers, including in older adults. However, older patients with cancer represent a heterogenous group as they can vary widely in frailty, cognition, and physical status.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the association between clinical frailty and immune-related treatment toxicity, hospitalization, and treatment discontinuation due to immune-related treatment toxicity in older patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors.

Methods: Patients aged 70 years and older treated with checkpoint inhibitors were selected from the TENT study, IMAGINE study, and "Tolerability and safety of immunotherapy study". Clinical frailty was assessed by the Geriatric-8 test score and World Health Organization (WHO) status. Outcomes were grades 3-5 toxicity, hospitalization, and treatment discontinuation due to toxicity during treatment.

Results: Of 99 patients included, 22% had comorbidities. While 33% of the patients were considered frail based on an abnormal Geriatric-8 test score of < 15, physical impairments were considered absent in 51% (WHO score of 0) and mild in 40% (WHO score of 1). Despite the limited sample size of the cohort, consistent trends were observed with patients with an abnormal Geriatric-8 test score of < 15 or a higher WHO score of 1 for having higher odds of toxicity [odds ratio (OR) 2.32 (95% CI 0.41-13.02); OR 1.33 (95% CI 0.45-4.17)], treatment discontinuation due to immune-related treatment toxicity [OR 2.25 (95% CI 0.61-8.31); OR 2.18 (95% CI 0.7-6.73)], and hospitalization due to immune-related treatment toxicity [OR 3.72 (95% CI 0.39-35.4); OR 1.31 (95% CI 0.35-4.9)]. Moreover, in a sub-analysis, we observed that the treatment discontinuation due to immune-related treatment toxicity occurred often in patients with grade 1-2 toxicity as well.

Conclusions: Although not statistically significant, in older patients treated with immunotherapy in a real-life population with cancer, we observed consistent trends towards increased toxicity, hospitalization, and treatment discontinuation with increasing frailty. Larger studies are needed to confirm these exploratory results. Moreover, older patients with a lower toxicity grade 1-2 experienced early treatment discontinuation frequently, suggesting a lower tolerance of toxicity.

背景:检查点抑制已成为包括老年人在内的多种癌症的有效治疗策略。然而,老年癌症患者是一个异质性群体,因为他们在虚弱程度、认知能力和身体状况方面差异很大:本研究旨在调查接受检查点抑制剂治疗的老年患者的临床虚弱程度与免疫相关治疗毒性、住院治疗以及因免疫相关治疗毒性而中断治疗之间的关系:方法:从TENT研究、IMAGINE研究和 "免疫疗法耐受性和安全性研究 "中选取70岁及以上接受检查点抑制剂治疗的患者。临床虚弱程度通过老年医学-8测试评分和世界卫生组织(WHO)状况进行评估。结果为3-5级毒性、住院治疗和治疗期间因毒性而中断治疗:在纳入的 99 名患者中,22% 有合并症。结果:在纳入的 99 名患者中,22% 的患者有合并症,33% 的患者因老年医学-8 测试得分异常而被认为体弱:尽管没有统计学意义,但我们观察到,在现实生活中接受免疫疗法治疗的老年癌症患者中,随着体弱程度的增加,毒性、住院治疗和治疗中断的发生率呈上升趋势。需要进行更大规模的研究来证实这些探索性结果。此外,1-2级毒性较低的老年患者经常提前终止治疗,这表明他们对毒性的耐受性较低。
{"title":"Toxicity in Older Patients with Cancer Receiving Immunotherapy: An Observational Study.","authors":"Estelle Tran Van Hoi, Stella Trompet, Yara Van Holstein, Frederiek Van Den Bos, Diana Van Heemst, Henrik Codrington, Geert Labots, Suzanne Lohman, Asli Ozkan, Johanneke Portielje, Simon P Mooijaart, Nienke A De Glas, Marloes Derks","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01114-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-024-01114-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Checkpoint inhibition has emerged as an effective treatment strategy for a variety of cancers, including in older adults. However, older patients with cancer represent a heterogenous group as they can vary widely in frailty, cognition, and physical status.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the association between clinical frailty and immune-related treatment toxicity, hospitalization, and treatment discontinuation due to immune-related treatment toxicity in older patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 70 years and older treated with checkpoint inhibitors were selected from the TENT study, IMAGINE study, and \"Tolerability and safety of immunotherapy study\". Clinical frailty was assessed by the Geriatric-8 test score and World Health Organization (WHO) status. Outcomes were grades 3-5 toxicity, hospitalization, and treatment discontinuation due to toxicity during treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 99 patients included, 22% had comorbidities. While 33% of the patients were considered frail based on an abnormal Geriatric-8 test score of < 15, physical impairments were considered absent in 51% (WHO score of 0) and mild in 40% (WHO score of 1). Despite the limited sample size of the cohort, consistent trends were observed with patients with an abnormal Geriatric-8 test score of < 15 or a higher WHO score of 1 for having higher odds of toxicity [odds ratio (OR) 2.32 (95% CI 0.41-13.02); OR 1.33 (95% CI 0.45-4.17)], treatment discontinuation due to immune-related treatment toxicity [OR 2.25 (95% CI 0.61-8.31); OR 2.18 (95% CI 0.7-6.73)], and hospitalization due to immune-related treatment toxicity [OR 3.72 (95% CI 0.39-35.4); OR 1.31 (95% CI 0.35-4.9)]. Moreover, in a sub-analysis, we observed that the treatment discontinuation due to immune-related treatment toxicity occurred often in patients with grade 1-2 toxicity as well.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although not statistically significant, in older patients treated with immunotherapy in a real-life population with cancer, we observed consistent trends towards increased toxicity, hospitalization, and treatment discontinuation with increasing frailty. Larger studies are needed to confirm these exploratory results. Moreover, older patients with a lower toxicity grade 1-2 experienced early treatment discontinuation frequently, suggesting a lower tolerance of toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"431-441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093836/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140896351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lipid-Lowering Medications are Associated with Reduced Sarcopenia-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults with Hyperlipidemia. 降脂药物与患有高血脂症的老年人肉质疏松相关的生活质量降低有关。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01111-2
Rizwan Qaisar, Imran M Khan, Asima Karim, Tahir Muhammad, Firdos Ahmad

Purpose: Statins medications negatively affect age-associated loss of muscle mass and strength, termed sarcopenia, and neuromuscular junction (NMJ) integrity. However, their association with the sarcopenia-related-quality-of-life (SarQoL) is unknown.

Methods: In this cross-sectional, case control study, we recruited male nonusers (n = 75 and age 75.2 ± 5.9 years) and users (n = 77 and age 77.1 ± 6.2 years) of statins to evaluate SarQoL and handgrip strength (HGS). We also measured plasma C-terminal agrin fragment-22 (CAF22) as a marker of NMJ degradation.

Results: Statin users had higher CAF22, and lower HGS, and cumulative SarQoL scores than non-users (all p < 0.05). Plasma CAF22 exhibited negative correlations with SarQoL scores for physical and mental health, locomotion, functionality, activities-of-daily-living, and cumulative SarQoL in statins users and non-users (all p < 0.05). Lastly, the cumulative SarQoL scores exhibited positive associations with HGS and gait speed in the study participants (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Collectively, statin usage was associated with NMJ degradation and reduced SarQoL. Statins should be cautiously prescribed in patients with sarcopenia with reduced QoL.

目的:他汀类药物会对与年龄相关的肌肉质量和力量损失(称为 "肌肉疏松症")以及神经肌肉接头(NMJ)完整性产生负面影响。然而,它们与肌肉疏松症相关生活质量(SarQoL)的关系尚不清楚:在这项横断面病例对照研究中,我们招募了他汀类药物的男性非使用者(n = 75,年龄为 75.2 ± 5.9 岁)和使用者(n = 77,年龄为 77.1 ± 6.2 岁),以评估肌肉疏松相关生活质量(SarQoL)和手握力(HGS)。我们还测量了血浆中作为 NMJ 降解标志物的 C-terminal agrin fragment-22 (CAF22):结果:与不使用他汀类药物者相比,使用他汀类药物者的 CAF22 较高、HGS 较低、SarQoL 累积得分较低(均为 p总之,他汀类药物的使用与 NMJ 退化和 SarQoL 降低有关。他汀类药物应慎用于质量生活水平下降的肌肉疏松症患者。
{"title":"Lipid-Lowering Medications are Associated with Reduced Sarcopenia-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults with Hyperlipidemia.","authors":"Rizwan Qaisar, Imran M Khan, Asima Karim, Tahir Muhammad, Firdos Ahmad","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01111-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-024-01111-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Statins medications negatively affect age-associated loss of muscle mass and strength, termed sarcopenia, and neuromuscular junction (NMJ) integrity. However, their association with the sarcopenia-related-quality-of-life (SarQoL) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional, case control study, we recruited male nonusers (n = 75 and age 75.2 ± 5.9 years) and users (n = 77 and age 77.1 ± 6.2 years) of statins to evaluate SarQoL and handgrip strength (HGS). We also measured plasma C-terminal agrin fragment-22 (CAF22) as a marker of NMJ degradation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statin users had higher CAF22, and lower HGS, and cumulative SarQoL scores than non-users (all p < 0.05). Plasma CAF22 exhibited negative correlations with SarQoL scores for physical and mental health, locomotion, functionality, activities-of-daily-living, and cumulative SarQoL in statins users and non-users (all p < 0.05). Lastly, the cumulative SarQoL scores exhibited positive associations with HGS and gait speed in the study participants (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collectively, statin usage was associated with NMJ degradation and reduced SarQoL. Statins should be cautiously prescribed in patients with sarcopenia with reduced QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"443-453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140335137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring Quality of Life in Deprescribing Trials: A Scoping Review. 在去处方化试验中衡量生活质量:范围审查》。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01113-0
Wade Thompson, Carina Lundby, Adam Bleik, Harman Waring, Jung Ah Hong, Chris Xi, Carmel Hughes, Douglas M Salzwedel, Emily G McDonald, Jennifer Pruskowski, Sion Scott, Anne Spinewine, Jean S Kutner, Trine Graabæk, Shahrzad Elmi, Frank Moriarty

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome to capture in clinical trials evaluating deprescribing interventions.

Objective: We aimed to conduct a scoping review to examine how QoL has been measured in deprescribing trials among older people and identify potentially relevant QoL scales, to better inform QoL measurement in future deprescribing trials.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, Epistemonikos, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of eligible studies (from inception to October 2023). We included randomized and non-randomized comparative studies with a control group that evaluated deprescribing and polypharmacy reduction interventions in people ≥ 65 years of age and measured QoL as an outcome. We also included studies describing the development and validation of QoL scales related to deprescribing, polypharmacy, or medication burden in adults ≥ 18 years of age. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, then full texts. Two independent reviewers extracted data from 25% of eligible studies in order to verify agreement, then a single reviewer extracted data from the remaining studies, which a second reviewer cross-checked. We critically appraised scales based on the COSMIN checklist.

Results: We retrieved 7290 articles, of which 52 were eligible for inclusion, including 44 deprescribing trials and eight scale development studies. From these studies, we found 21 scales that have been used in the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy (12 generic scales used in clinical trials and nine medication-specific scales). Variations of the generic EQ-5D were the most used scales. The measurement properties of scales for capturing changes in QoL from deprescribing were uncertain. Medication-specific QoL scales have not been employed in deprescribing clinical trials and thus, their performance in this context is also not clear.

Conclusions: Several existing QoL scales have been applied to the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy clinical trials, and new scales specific to the problem have been proposed. If deprescribing does impact QoL, our findings suggest it is uncertain whether existing QoL scales can practically and reliably capture such a change or whether any scale is best. However, this review compares various aspects of the scales that researchers and clinicians can consider in decisions about measuring QoL in deprescribing trials, and in planning future research.

Protocol registration: Open Science Framework: osf.io/aez6w.

背景:生活质量(QoL在评估去势干预措施的临床试验中,生活质量(QoL)是一项重要的结果:我们的目的是进行一次范围界定审查,研究如何在老年人的去处方化试验中测量 QoL,并确定可能相关的 QoL 量表,以便在未来的去处方化试验中更好地测量 QoL:我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane对照试验中央登记册、Google Scholar、Epistemonikos、ClinicalTrials.gov以及符合条件的研究的参考文献列表(从开始到2023年10月)。我们纳入了带有对照组的随机和非随机比较研究,这些研究评估了针对≥ 65 岁人群的去处方化和减少多药滥用干预措施,并将 QoL 作为一项结果进行了测量。我们还纳入了描述与≥18 岁成人的去处方化、多药联用或用药负担相关的 QoL 量表的开发和验证的研究。两名独立审稿人首先筛选了标题和摘要,然后筛选了全文。两位独立审稿人提取了 25% 符合条件的研究数据,以验证一致性,然后由一位审稿人提取其余研究的数据,再由第二位审稿人进行交叉核对。我们根据 COSMIN 检查表对量表进行了严格评估:我们检索了 7290 篇文章,其中 52 篇符合纳入条件,包括 44 项处方试验和 8 项量表开发研究。在这些研究中,我们发现了 21 个用于去处方化/配药的量表(12 个用于临床试验的通用量表和 9 个药物特异性量表)。通用 EQ-5D 的变体是使用最多的量表。这些量表在捕捉减药引起的 QoL 变化方面的测量特性尚不确定。针对特定药物的 QoL 量表尚未在去处方化临床试验中使用过,因此,它们在这种情况下的表现也不明确:结论:现有的几种 QoL 量表已被应用于去处方/配药临床试验中,并提出了专门针对该问题的新量表。我们的研究结果表明,如果去处方化确实影响了 QoL,那么现有的 QoL 量表是否能切实可靠地反映出这种变化,或者是否任何量表都是最好的,这些都是不确定的。不过,本综述对量表的各个方面进行了比较,研究人员和临床医生在决定是否在去处方化试验中测量 QoL 以及规划未来研究时,可以考虑这些量表:协议注册:开放科学框架:osf.io/aez6w。
{"title":"Measuring Quality of Life in Deprescribing Trials: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Wade Thompson, Carina Lundby, Adam Bleik, Harman Waring, Jung Ah Hong, Chris Xi, Carmel Hughes, Douglas M Salzwedel, Emily G McDonald, Jennifer Pruskowski, Sion Scott, Anne Spinewine, Jean S Kutner, Trine Graabæk, Shahrzad Elmi, Frank Moriarty","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01113-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-024-01113-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome to capture in clinical trials evaluating deprescribing interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to conduct a scoping review to examine how QoL has been measured in deprescribing trials among older people and identify potentially relevant QoL scales, to better inform QoL measurement in future deprescribing trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, Epistemonikos, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of eligible studies (from inception to October 2023). We included randomized and non-randomized comparative studies with a control group that evaluated deprescribing and polypharmacy reduction interventions in people ≥ 65 years of age and measured QoL as an outcome. We also included studies describing the development and validation of QoL scales related to deprescribing, polypharmacy, or medication burden in adults ≥ 18 years of age. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, then full texts. Two independent reviewers extracted data from 25% of eligible studies in order to verify agreement, then a single reviewer extracted data from the remaining studies, which a second reviewer cross-checked. We critically appraised scales based on the COSMIN checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 7290 articles, of which 52 were eligible for inclusion, including 44 deprescribing trials and eight scale development studies. From these studies, we found 21 scales that have been used in the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy (12 generic scales used in clinical trials and nine medication-specific scales). Variations of the generic EQ-5D were the most used scales. The measurement properties of scales for capturing changes in QoL from deprescribing were uncertain. Medication-specific QoL scales have not been employed in deprescribing clinical trials and thus, their performance in this context is also not clear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several existing QoL scales have been applied to the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy clinical trials, and new scales specific to the problem have been proposed. If deprescribing does impact QoL, our findings suggest it is uncertain whether existing QoL scales can practically and reliably capture such a change or whether any scale is best. However, this review compares various aspects of the scales that researchers and clinicians can consider in decisions about measuring QoL in deprescribing trials, and in planning future research.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>Open Science Framework: osf.io/aez6w.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"379-397"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140862470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors with Incident Dementia: Analysis Based on Population-Based Cohort Studies 肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂与痴呆症发病率的关系:基于人群队列研究的分析
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01112-1
Saskia Berger, Kristine F. Moseholm, Emilie R. Hegelund, Falko Tesch, Minh Chau S. Nguyen, Laust H. Mortensen, Majken K. Jensen, Jochen Schmitt, Kenneth J. Mukamal

Background and Objective

Preliminary evidence suggests a possible preventive effect of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi) on incident dementia. The objective of the analysis was to investigate the association between TNFi and the risk of incident dementia in a population undergoing treatment for rheumatological disorders.

Methods

We followed patients aged ≥ 65 years with dementia and rheumatological conditions in two cohort studies, DANBIO (N = 21,538), a Danish clinical database, and AOK PLUS (N = 7112), a German health insurance database. We defined incident dementia using diagnostic codes and/or medication use and used Cox regression to compare the associations of TNFi with other rheumatological therapies on the risk of dementia. To ensure that the patients were receiving long-term medication, we included patients with rheumatic diseases and systemic therapies.

Results

We observed similar trends towards a lower risk of dementia associated with TNFi versus other anti-inflammatory agents in both cohorts (hazard ratios were 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.76, 1.10] in DANBIO and 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.63, 1.24] in AOK PLUS, respectively).

Conclusions

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors may decrease the risk of incident dementia although the association did not reach statistical significance in this analysis. Further research, ideally with randomization, is needed to gauge the potential of repurposing TNFi for dementia prevention and/or treatment.

背景与目的初步证据表明,肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂(TNFi)可能对痴呆症有预防作用。方法我们对丹麦临床数据库DANBIO(N = 21538)和德国医疗保险数据库AOK PLUS(N = 7112)这两项队列研究中年龄≥65岁、患有痴呆症和风湿病的患者进行了追踪调查。我们使用诊断代码和/或用药情况来定义痴呆症,并使用Cox回归法比较TNFi与其他风湿疗法对痴呆症风险的影响。为确保患者长期接受药物治疗,我们将患有风湿性疾病和接受过系统治疗的患者纳入了研究范围。结果我们观察到,在两个队列中,TNFi与其他抗炎药物相比,痴呆症风险呈相似的降低趋势(危险比为0.结论肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂可能会降低痴呆症的发病风险,尽管在本分析中这一关联未达到统计学意义。需要进一步开展研究,最好采用随机方法,以评估将TNFi重新用于痴呆症预防和/或治疗的潜力。
{"title":"Association of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors with Incident Dementia: Analysis Based on Population-Based Cohort Studies","authors":"Saskia Berger, Kristine F. Moseholm, Emilie R. Hegelund, Falko Tesch, Minh Chau S. Nguyen, Laust H. Mortensen, Majken K. Jensen, Jochen Schmitt, Kenneth J. Mukamal","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01112-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01112-1","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and Objective</h3><p>Preliminary evidence suggests a possible preventive effect of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi) on incident dementia. The objective of the analysis was to investigate the association between TNFi and the risk of incident dementia in a population undergoing treatment for rheumatological disorders.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We followed patients aged ≥ 65 years with dementia and rheumatological conditions in two cohort studies, DANBIO (<i>N</i> = 21,538), a Danish clinical database, and AOK PLUS (<i>N</i> = 7112), a German health insurance database. We defined incident dementia using diagnostic codes and/or medication use and used Cox regression to compare the associations of TNFi with other rheumatological therapies on the risk of dementia. To ensure that the patients were receiving long-term medication, we included patients with rheumatic diseases and systemic therapies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We observed similar trends towards a lower risk of dementia associated with TNFi versus other anti-inflammatory agents in both cohorts (hazard ratios were 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.76, 1.10] in DANBIO and 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.63, 1.24] in AOK PLUS, respectively).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors may decrease the risk of incident dementia although the association did not reach statistical significance in this analysis. Further research, ideally with randomization, is needed to gauge the potential of repurposing TNFi for dementia prevention and/or treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140600288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinician and Family Caregiver Perspectives on Deprescribing Chronic Disease Medications in Older Nursing Home Residents Near the End of Life 临床医生和家庭护理者对临近生命终点的养老院老人停用慢性病药物的看法
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01110-3
Loren J. Schleiden, Gloria Klima, Keri L. Rodriguez, Mary Ersek, Jacob E. Robinson, Ryan P. Hickson, Dawn Smith, John Cashy, Florentina E. Sileanu, Carolyn T. Thorpe

Introduction

Nursing home (NH) residents with limited life expectancy (LLE) who are intensely treated for hyperlipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes may benefit from deprescribing.

Objective

This study sought to describe NH clinician and family caregiver perspectives on key influences on deprescribing decisions for chronic disease medications in NH residents near the end of life.

Methods

We recruited family caregivers of veterans who recently died in a Veterans Affairs (VA) NH, known as community living centers (CLCs), and CLC healthcare clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, registered nurses). Respondents completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences with deprescribing statin, antihypertensive, and antidiabetic medications for residents near end of life. We conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify key themes regarding influences on deprescribing decisions.

Results

Thirteen family caregivers and 13 clinicians completed interviews. Key themes included (1) clinicians and caregivers both prefer to minimize drug burden; (2) clinical factors strongly influence deprescribing of chronic disease medications, with differences in how clinicians and caregivers weigh specific factors; (3) caregivers trust and rely on clinicians to make deprescribing decisions; (4) clinicians perceive caregiver involvement and buy-in as essential to deprescribing decisions, which requires time and effort to obtain; and (5) clinicians perceive conflicting care from other clinicians as a barrier to deprescribing.

Conclusions

Findings suggest a need for efforts to encourage communication with and education for family caregivers of residents with LLE about deprescribing, and to foster better collaboration among clinicians in CLC and non-CLC settings.

导言:预期寿命有限的疗养院(NH)住院患者正在接受高脂血症、高血压或糖尿病的强化治疗,他们可能会从取消处方中获益。本研究旨在描述疗养院临床医生和家庭护理人员对临近生命终点的疗养院住院患者取消慢性病药物处方决定的关键影响因素的看法。方法我们招募了最近在退伍军人事务(VA)NH(即社区生活中心(CLC))去世的退伍军人的家庭护理人员,以及社区生活中心的医疗保健临床医生(医生、执业护士、医生助理、药剂师、注册护士)。受访者完成了半结构化访谈,讲述了他们为临近生命终结的居民停用他汀类药物、抗高血压药物和抗糖尿病药物的经历。我们对访谈记录进行了主题分析,以确定影响停药决定的关键主题。结果13 位家庭照护者和 13 位临床医生完成了访谈。关键主题包括:(1)临床医生和护理人员都倾向于尽量减轻药物负担;(2)临床因素对慢性病药物的处方有很大影响,临床医生和护理人员在权衡特定因素时存在差异;(3)护理人员信任并依赖临床医生做出处方决定;(4)临床医生认为护理人员的参与和认同对处方决定至关重要,而这需要时间和精力来获得;以及(5)临床医生认为来自其他临床医生的护理冲突是处方决定的障碍。结论研究结果表明,需要努力鼓励与患有 LLE 的住院患者的家庭护理者就去势处方进行沟通并对其进行相关教育,同时促进 CLC 和非 CLC 环境中的临床医生之间更好地合作。
{"title":"Clinician and Family Caregiver Perspectives on Deprescribing Chronic Disease Medications in Older Nursing Home Residents Near the End of Life","authors":"Loren J. Schleiden, Gloria Klima, Keri L. Rodriguez, Mary Ersek, Jacob E. Robinson, Ryan P. Hickson, Dawn Smith, John Cashy, Florentina E. Sileanu, Carolyn T. Thorpe","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01110-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01110-3","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Nursing home (NH) residents with limited life expectancy (LLE) who are intensely treated for hyperlipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes may benefit from deprescribing.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This study sought to describe NH clinician and family caregiver perspectives on key influences on deprescribing decisions for chronic disease medications in NH residents near the end of life.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We recruited family caregivers of veterans who recently died in a Veterans Affairs (VA) NH, known as community living centers (CLCs), and CLC healthcare clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, registered nurses). Respondents completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences with deprescribing statin, antihypertensive, and antidiabetic medications for residents near end of life. We conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify key themes regarding influences on deprescribing decisions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Thirteen family caregivers and 13 clinicians completed interviews. Key themes included (1) clinicians and caregivers both prefer to minimize drug burden; (2) clinical factors strongly influence deprescribing of chronic disease medications, with differences in how clinicians and caregivers weigh specific factors; (3) caregivers trust and rely on clinicians to make deprescribing decisions; (4) clinicians perceive caregiver involvement and buy-in as essential to deprescribing decisions, which requires time and effort to obtain; and (5) clinicians perceive conflicting care from other clinicians as a barrier to deprescribing.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Findings suggest a need for efforts to encourage communication with and education for family caregivers of residents with LLE about deprescribing, and to foster better collaboration among clinicians in CLC and non-CLC settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140600234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of Scleritis in Older Adults. 老年人巩膜炎的管理。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01105-0
Laura Butler, Oren Tomkins-Netzer, Or Reiser, Rachael L Niederer

Scleritis, an inflammatory disease of the eye affecting scleral tissue, presents unique challenges in the older adult population. Unlike their younger counterparts, older individuals manifest a distinct spectrum of the disease with different underlying etiologies, co-morbidities, altered immune function, and an increased risk of systemic side effects from medication choices. Addressing these complexities necessitates a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach. Treatment of choice will depend on any underlying cause but generally involves non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic or local corticosteroids, and potentially disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Utilization of these therapeutic agents in older adults warrants careful consideration because of their potential side-effect profiles. This article critically examines the specific concerns for the use of these drugs in older patients and reviews the existing literature on their use in this specific cohort.

巩膜炎是一种影响巩膜组织的眼部炎症性疾病,给老年人群带来了独特的挑战。与年轻人不同,老年人表现出不同的疾病谱,有不同的潜在病因、并发症、免疫功能改变以及因药物选择而增加的全身副作用风险。要解决这些复杂问题,就必须采取全面的多学科方法。治疗方法的选择取决于任何潜在的病因,但一般包括非甾体类抗炎药、全身或局部皮质类固醇激素以及潜在的疾病修饰抗风湿药。由于其潜在的副作用,在老年人中使用这些治疗药物需要慎重考虑。本文对老年患者使用这些药物的具体问题进行了认真研究,并回顾了在这一特定人群中使用这些药物的现有文献。
{"title":"Management of Scleritis in Older Adults.","authors":"Laura Butler, Oren Tomkins-Netzer, Or Reiser, Rachael L Niederer","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01105-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-024-01105-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scleritis, an inflammatory disease of the eye affecting scleral tissue, presents unique challenges in the older adult population. Unlike their younger counterparts, older individuals manifest a distinct spectrum of the disease with different underlying etiologies, co-morbidities, altered immune function, and an increased risk of systemic side effects from medication choices. Addressing these complexities necessitates a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach. Treatment of choice will depend on any underlying cause but generally involves non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic or local corticosteroids, and potentially disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Utilization of these therapeutic agents in older adults warrants careful consideration because of their potential side-effect profiles. This article critically examines the specific concerns for the use of these drugs in older patients and reviews the existing literature on their use in this specific cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"287-302"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11021297/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140027660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Drugs & Aging
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1