Pub Date : 2025-07-01Epub Date: 2025-07-03DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01208-2
Sarah N Hilmer, Luigi Ferrucci, Antonio Cherubini
Appropriate drug treatment can enhance the likelihood of experiencing healthy aging and maintaining functional ability up to very late in life. Strong evidence exists that overall drugs can help prevent and manage diseases. However, such evidence is mostly available from studies that are not representative of older people and do not include functional/well-being outcomes. Therapeutic drugs can also impair physical and cognitive function and social interactions, particularly in the context of polypharmacy, multimorbidity and frailty. Certain drugs can affect the ability to exercise and consume a healthy diet, which are key nonpharmacological interventions that promote healthy aging. Yet, exercise and nutritional interventions can help manage adverse drug reactions. In the future, drugs (gerotherapeutics) may be developed that slow the aging process, which should prevent or delay the incidence and progression of many chronic diseases, improving healthy aging.
{"title":"Drugs and Healthy Aging.","authors":"Sarah N Hilmer, Luigi Ferrucci, Antonio Cherubini","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01208-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01208-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Appropriate drug treatment can enhance the likelihood of experiencing healthy aging and maintaining functional ability up to very late in life. Strong evidence exists that overall drugs can help prevent and manage diseases. However, such evidence is mostly available from studies that are not representative of older people and do not include functional/well-being outcomes. Therapeutic drugs can also impair physical and cognitive function and social interactions, particularly in the context of polypharmacy, multimorbidity and frailty. Certain drugs can affect the ability to exercise and consume a healthy diet, which are key nonpharmacological interventions that promote healthy aging. Yet, exercise and nutritional interventions can help manage adverse drug reactions. In the future, drugs (gerotherapeutics) may be developed that slow the aging process, which should prevent or delay the incidence and progression of many chronic diseases, improving healthy aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"591-598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254174/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144552599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Whether risk factors for vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity (VIN) development reported in recent years are also risk factors in the older population has not yet been fully investigated. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for VIN development in the older population and to examine factors influencing kidney prognosis after VIN development.
Methods: A total of 468 patients aged ≥ 75 years were included in this study. Factors related to VIN onset in older adults were examined through logistic regression analysis.
Results: A total of 40 patients (8.5%) with VIN were identified. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in body mass index (BMI), combined use of tazobactam/piperacillin (T/P), and intensive care unit admission between the VIN and non-VIN groups (P = 0.042, 0.005, and 0.040, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified the combined use of T/P as a factor related to VIN. In patients aged 85 years or older, the concomitant use of T/P and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were identified as factors related to VIN. Compared with the VIN recovery group, the nonrecovery group had a longer time to VIN onset and a higher proportion of patients on concomitant diuretics.
Conclusions: This study revealed that the combined use of T/P and ICU admission were risk factors for VIN in older individuals. Additionally, the time until VIN onset and the concomitant use of diuretics may affect the kidney prognosis of older patients who develop VIN. When administering vancomycin to older patients, it is necessary to eliminate or be cautious of these factors in relation to VIN development and kidney prognosis.
{"title":"Risk Factors for Vancomycin-Induced Nephrotoxicity and Kidney Prognosis in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Masaki Takigawa, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Masako Kinoshita, Toshihiro Ishii, Masayuki Masuda","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01203-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01203-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Whether risk factors for vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity (VIN) development reported in recent years are also risk factors in the older population has not yet been fully investigated. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for VIN development in the older population and to examine factors influencing kidney prognosis after VIN development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 468 patients aged ≥ 75 years were included in this study. Factors related to VIN onset in older adults were examined through logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 patients (8.5%) with VIN were identified. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in body mass index (BMI), combined use of tazobactam/piperacillin (T/P), and intensive care unit admission between the VIN and non-VIN groups (P = 0.042, 0.005, and 0.040, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified the combined use of T/P as a factor related to VIN. In patients aged 85 years or older, the concomitant use of T/P and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were identified as factors related to VIN. Compared with the VIN recovery group, the nonrecovery group had a longer time to VIN onset and a higher proportion of patients on concomitant diuretics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that the combined use of T/P and ICU admission were risk factors for VIN in older individuals. Additionally, the time until VIN onset and the concomitant use of diuretics may affect the kidney prognosis of older patients who develop VIN. When administering vancomycin to older patients, it is necessary to eliminate or be cautious of these factors in relation to VIN development and kidney prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"547-557"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144062821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-04-15DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01204-6
Alessio Novella, Marina Azab, Luca Pasina
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing use of anticholinergic medications in older adults with multiple chronic conditions raises significant concerns regarding their cumulative anticholinergic burden, which is linked to several adverse outcomes. This study aimed to compare existing anticholinergic burden scales to identify those most effective at correlating drug-induced anticholinergic load with cognitive and functional impairment. In addition, we proposed a new classification system on the basis of published scales to optimally correlate total anticholinergic burden with observed clinical deficits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the REPOSI registry, which collects clinical and therapeutic information on patients aged 65 years and older admitted to internal medicine and geriatric wards across Italy. Anticholinergic exposure was assessed using 20 established anticholinergic burden scales from literature. In addition, seven experimental scales were developed on the basis of published scales and various mathematical functions (maximum, mode, median, and mean) to evaluate potential differences in measuring anticholinergic load. Outcomes included cognitive impairment, assessed using the Short Blessed Test (SBT), and functional independence, measured by the Barthel Index (BI). A zero-inflated negative binomial model was applied to analyze associations between anticholinergic burden and each outcome. Given the variability in drug scoring across published scales, we developed seven experimental scales using different mathematical functions (maximum, mode, median, and mean) to standardize scoring. Three versions included a null-score adjustment to account for drugs omitted in some scales, ensuring a more comprehensive measure of anticholinergic burden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7735 patients, higher anticholinergic burden was consistently associated with increased cognitive impairment (SBT) and physical dependency (BI) across all existing and proposed scales. The modified Anticholinergic Risk Scale (mARS) scale showed the strongest associations with cognitive (rate ratio [RR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06, 1.13; P < 0.0001) and physical impairment (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11, 1.24; P < 0.0001), indicating an 18% higher risk of dependency per unit increase, while the CRIDECO Anticholinergic Load Scale (CALS) scale exhibited the best model fit. Our newly developed scales confirmed these associations, with the median with null score and the mean with null score scale showing the strongest link to cognitive impairment (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05, 1.09; P < 0.0001) and the strongest association with physical dependency (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08, 1.15; P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Scales that identify a greater proportion of patients with at least one anticholinergic drug may provide a more comprehensive assessment of anticholinergic burden in clinical practice. While no single s
背景:患有多种慢性疾病的老年人越来越多地使用抗胆碱能药物,这引起了对其累积抗胆碱能负担的重大关注,这与几种不良后果有关。本研究旨在比较现有的抗胆碱能负荷量表,以确定哪些量表最有效地将药物诱导的抗胆碱能负荷与认知和功能障碍联系起来。此外,我们提出了一个新的分类系统,以公布的量表为基础,以最佳地将总抗胆碱能负荷与观察到的临床缺陷联系起来。方法:这项横断面研究分析了来自REPOSI登记处的数据,该登记处收集了意大利各地内科和老年病房收治的65岁及以上患者的临床和治疗信息。使用文献中已有的20种抗胆碱能负荷量表对抗胆碱能暴露进行评估。此外,根据已发表的量表和各种数学函数(最大值、众数、中位数和平均值)开发了七个实验量表,以评估测量抗胆碱能负荷的潜在差异。结果包括认知障碍,用短祝福测试(SBT)评估,功能独立性,用Barthel指数(BI)衡量。采用零膨胀负二项模型分析抗胆碱能负荷与各结果之间的关系。考虑到已发表量表中药物评分的可变性,我们开发了七个实验量表,使用不同的数学函数(最大值、模式、中位数和平均值)来标准化评分。三个版本包括一个零分调整,以解释一些量表中遗漏的药物,确保抗胆碱能负担的更全面的测量。结果:在7735例患者中,较高的抗胆碱能负荷在所有现有和拟议的量表中均与认知障碍(SBT)和身体依赖(BI)的增加一致相关。改良的抗胆碱能风险量表(mARS)与认知能力的相关性最强(RR = 1.10, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.06, 1.13;P < 0.0001)和身体损伤(RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11, 1.24;P < 0.0001),表明每单位增加的依赖风险增加18%,而CRIDECO抗胆碱能负荷量表(CALS)表现出最佳的模型拟合。我们新开发的量表证实了这些关联,零分量表的中位数和平均值显示出与认知障碍的最强联系(RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05, 1.09;P < 0.0001),且与身体依赖关系最强(RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08, 1.15;P < 0.0001)。结论:在临床实践中,使用至少一种抗胆碱能药物的患者比例更大的量表可以提供更全面的抗胆碱能负担评估。虽然没有单一的量表在所有结果中显示出明确的优势,但这些量表可以识别有风险的患者。优先使用覆盖范围更广的量表可以加强临床决策,优化老年人多重用药的管理,并认识到其对认知和功能结局的潜在影响。
{"title":"Comparison of Anticholinergic Burden Scales and Their Association with Cognitive and Functional Impairment in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the REPOSI Database.","authors":"Alessio Novella, Marina Azab, Luca Pasina","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01204-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01204-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing use of anticholinergic medications in older adults with multiple chronic conditions raises significant concerns regarding their cumulative anticholinergic burden, which is linked to several adverse outcomes. This study aimed to compare existing anticholinergic burden scales to identify those most effective at correlating drug-induced anticholinergic load with cognitive and functional impairment. In addition, we proposed a new classification system on the basis of published scales to optimally correlate total anticholinergic burden with observed clinical deficits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the REPOSI registry, which collects clinical and therapeutic information on patients aged 65 years and older admitted to internal medicine and geriatric wards across Italy. Anticholinergic exposure was assessed using 20 established anticholinergic burden scales from literature. In addition, seven experimental scales were developed on the basis of published scales and various mathematical functions (maximum, mode, median, and mean) to evaluate potential differences in measuring anticholinergic load. Outcomes included cognitive impairment, assessed using the Short Blessed Test (SBT), and functional independence, measured by the Barthel Index (BI). A zero-inflated negative binomial model was applied to analyze associations between anticholinergic burden and each outcome. Given the variability in drug scoring across published scales, we developed seven experimental scales using different mathematical functions (maximum, mode, median, and mean) to standardize scoring. Three versions included a null-score adjustment to account for drugs omitted in some scales, ensuring a more comprehensive measure of anticholinergic burden.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7735 patients, higher anticholinergic burden was consistently associated with increased cognitive impairment (SBT) and physical dependency (BI) across all existing and proposed scales. The modified Anticholinergic Risk Scale (mARS) scale showed the strongest associations with cognitive (rate ratio [RR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06, 1.13; P < 0.0001) and physical impairment (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11, 1.24; P < 0.0001), indicating an 18% higher risk of dependency per unit increase, while the CRIDECO Anticholinergic Load Scale (CALS) scale exhibited the best model fit. Our newly developed scales confirmed these associations, with the median with null score and the mean with null score scale showing the strongest link to cognitive impairment (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05, 1.09; P < 0.0001) and the strongest association with physical dependency (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08, 1.15; P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Scales that identify a greater proportion of patients with at least one anticholinergic drug may provide a more comprehensive assessment of anticholinergic burden in clinical practice. While no single s","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"559-572"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143983965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-04-23DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01206-4
Jennifer Bolt, Kristine Lin, Melanie Fenton, Jennifer M Jakobi
Background and objective: Despite the increasing use of cannabis by older Canadians, little is known about cannabis safety in this population, particularly in non-clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to describe the self-reported adverse effects experienced by community-dwelling older Canadians who use cannabis.
Methods: Canadians aged 50 years and older completed an online survey regarding their knowledge, perceptions, and experiences with cannabis. Respondents who reported current cannabis use were asked to report any adverse effects experienced in the past year related to their cannabis use. Adverse effects were categorized, and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to assess predictors of adverse effects.
Results: A total of 1615 older adults completed the survey, of whom 503 reported current use of cannabis and were included in this analysis. Adverse effects were reported by 308 participants (61.2%) and included dry mouth (36.2%), feeling high (25.9%), and adverse effects impacting balance (22.1%) and mental alertness (20.3%). Compared with participants aged 50-60 years, those aged 70 years and older had lower odds of reporting any adverse effects (odds ratio (OR) 0.524, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.303-0.906) or adverse effects impacting mental alertness (OR 0.318, 95% CI 0.172-0.588). Female participants had higher odds of reporting any adverse effect (OR 1.989, 95% CI 1.332-2971) or adverse effects impacting balance (OR 1.930, 95% CI 1.198-3.109).
Conclusions: Adverse effects to cannabis are common amongst community-dwelling older adults. Increased education and guidance regarding adverse effects of cannabis, including the composition and dose of cannabis products, may help increase safe use by this population.
背景和目的:尽管加拿大老年人越来越多地使用大麻,但对这一人群的大麻安全性知之甚少,特别是在非临床环境中。本研究的目的是描述社区居住的加拿大老年人使用大麻所经历的自我报告的不良反应。方法:50岁及以上的加拿大人完成了一项关于他们对大麻的知识、看法和经历的在线调查。要求报告目前使用大麻的答复者报告过去一年中与其使用大麻有关的任何不利影响。对不良反应进行分类,并进行多变量logistic回归来评估不良反应的预测因子。结果:共有1615名老年人完成了调查,其中503人报告目前使用大麻,并被纳入本分析。308名参与者(61.2%)报告了不良反应,包括口干(36.2%)、感觉兴奋(25.9%)、影响平衡(22.1%)和精神警觉(20.3%)的不良反应。与50-60岁的参与者相比,70岁及以上的参与者报告任何不良反应的几率较低(优势比(OR) 0.524, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.303-0.906)或影响精神警觉性的不良反应(OR 0.318, 95% CI 0.172-0.588)。女性参与者报告任何不良反应(OR 1.989, 95% CI 1.332-2971)或影响平衡的不良反应(OR 1.930, 95% CI 1.198-3.109)的几率更高。结论:大麻的不良反应在社区居住的老年人中很常见。加强关于大麻不利影响的教育和指导,包括大麻产品的成分和剂量,可能有助于增加这一人群的安全使用。
{"title":"Prevalence of Self-Reported Adverse Effects to Cannabis by Older Canadians: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.","authors":"Jennifer Bolt, Kristine Lin, Melanie Fenton, Jennifer M Jakobi","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01206-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01206-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Despite the increasing use of cannabis by older Canadians, little is known about cannabis safety in this population, particularly in non-clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to describe the self-reported adverse effects experienced by community-dwelling older Canadians who use cannabis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Canadians aged 50 years and older completed an online survey regarding their knowledge, perceptions, and experiences with cannabis. Respondents who reported current cannabis use were asked to report any adverse effects experienced in the past year related to their cannabis use. Adverse effects were categorized, and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to assess predictors of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1615 older adults completed the survey, of whom 503 reported current use of cannabis and were included in this analysis. Adverse effects were reported by 308 participants (61.2%) and included dry mouth (36.2%), feeling high (25.9%), and adverse effects impacting balance (22.1%) and mental alertness (20.3%). Compared with participants aged 50-60 years, those aged 70 years and older had lower odds of reporting any adverse effects (odds ratio (OR) 0.524, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.303-0.906) or adverse effects impacting mental alertness (OR 0.318, 95% CI 0.172-0.588). Female participants had higher odds of reporting any adverse effect (OR 1.989, 95% CI 1.332-2971) or adverse effects impacting balance (OR 1.930, 95% CI 1.198-3.109).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adverse effects to cannabis are common amongst community-dwelling older adults. Increased education and guidance regarding adverse effects of cannabis, including the composition and dose of cannabis products, may help increase safe use by this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"573-582"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144001392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-05-16DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6
Ana Vaz Ferreira, Matthieu Delaye, Arnaud Pages, Antoine Hollebecque, Anas Gazzah, Rastio Bahleda, Jean-Marie Michot, Francois-Xavier Danlos, Lauren Seknazi, Vincent Goldschmidt, Clémence Hénon, Madonna Sakkal, Cristina Smolenschi, Stéphane Champiat, Aurelien Marabelle, Yohann Loriot, Céline Nagera Lazarovici, Zoé Ap-Thomas, Geoffroy Beraud Chaullet, Santiago Ponce Aix, Christophe Massard, Kaissa Ouali, Maxime Frelaut, Capucine Baldini
Background: Data on the use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in older patients are scarce.
Objective: The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of ADCs used in early phase clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared with younger patients.
Patients and methods: All patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials (phase I or II) of ADCs for solid tumors in our institution between November 2014 and May 2023 were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Safety and efficacy were compared between patients ≥ 65 and < 65 years old (y.o).
Results: A total of 136 patients were included in our study, with 43 (31.6%) patients aged ≥ 65 y.o. In comparison with the younger population, patients aged 65 years or older had similar demographic characteristics. Older patients experienced the same rate of all-grade adverse events (95.3 versus 97.8%) and all-grade related adverse events (65.1 versus 66.7%) but more high-grade adverse events (41.9 versus 30.1%) than younger patients. In the univariate analysis, we identified age, taken as a continuous variable, as associated with high-grade adverse event (p = 0.047). No statistically significant difference was found between older and younger patients in terms of disease control rate (65 versus 54%), median progression-free survival (2.76 months [95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.64-3.75] compared with 2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34), or median overall survival (6.57 months [95% CI 4.01-13.01] compared to 7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65).
Conclusions: In our cohort, ADC therapy provided comparable survival benefits for the older patients but with a higher risk of high-grade adverse event.
背景:关于抗体药物偶联物(adc)在老年患者中的应用的数据很少。目的:目的是研究adc用于≥65岁患者早期临床试验的安全性和有效性,并与年轻患者进行比较。患者和方法:2014年11月至2023年5月在我院参加adc治疗实体瘤早期临床试验(I期或II期)的所有患者纳入本回顾性单中心研究。比较≥65岁和< 65岁患者的安全性和有效性。结果:我们的研究共纳入136例患者,其中43例(31.6%)患者年龄≥65岁。与年轻人群相比,65岁及以上的患者具有相似的人口统计学特征。老年患者的所有级别不良事件发生率(95.3比97.8%)和所有级别相关不良事件发生率(65.1比66.7%)相同,但高级不良事件发生率(41.9比30.1%)高于年轻患者。在单因素分析中,我们确定年龄作为一个连续变量,与严重不良事件相关(p = 0.047)。老年和年轻患者在疾病控制率(65比54%)、中位无进展生存期(2.76个月[95%置信区间,95% CI 1.64-3.75]比2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34)或中位总生存期(6.57个月[95% CI 4.01-13.01]比7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65)方面无统计学差异。结论:在我们的队列中,ADC治疗为老年患者提供了相当的生存益处,但有更高的严重不良事件风险。
{"title":"Age Does not Affect the Efficacy of Antibody Drug Conjugates, But is Associated with High-Grade Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer Enrolled in Early Phase Clinical Trials.","authors":"Ana Vaz Ferreira, Matthieu Delaye, Arnaud Pages, Antoine Hollebecque, Anas Gazzah, Rastio Bahleda, Jean-Marie Michot, Francois-Xavier Danlos, Lauren Seknazi, Vincent Goldschmidt, Clémence Hénon, Madonna Sakkal, Cristina Smolenschi, Stéphane Champiat, Aurelien Marabelle, Yohann Loriot, Céline Nagera Lazarovici, Zoé Ap-Thomas, Geoffroy Beraud Chaullet, Santiago Ponce Aix, Christophe Massard, Kaissa Ouali, Maxime Frelaut, Capucine Baldini","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in older patients are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of ADCs used in early phase clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared with younger patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials (phase I or II) of ADCs for solid tumors in our institution between November 2014 and May 2023 were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Safety and efficacy were compared between patients ≥ 65 and < 65 years old (y.o).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 patients were included in our study, with 43 (31.6%) patients aged ≥ 65 y.o. In comparison with the younger population, patients aged 65 years or older had similar demographic characteristics. Older patients experienced the same rate of all-grade adverse events (95.3 versus 97.8%) and all-grade related adverse events (65.1 versus 66.7%) but more high-grade adverse events (41.9 versus 30.1%) than younger patients. In the univariate analysis, we identified age, taken as a continuous variable, as associated with high-grade adverse event (p = 0.047). No statistically significant difference was found between older and younger patients in terms of disease control rate (65 versus 54%), median progression-free survival (2.76 months [95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.64-3.75] compared with 2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34), or median overall survival (6.57 months [95% CI 4.01-13.01] compared to 7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort, ADC therapy provided comparable survival benefits for the older patients but with a higher risk of high-grade adverse event.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"583-589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144076716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Prescribing cascades occur when a new drug is prescribed to treat an adverse drug event caused by an existing medication, resulting in unnecessary, or potentially hazardous additional drugs. To date, there are no published studies assessing the prevalence of prescribing cascades in older hospitalised adults.
Objective: To investigate the prevalence of prescribing cascades in hospitalised older adults.
Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of adults aged ≥ 65 years with multimorbidity and polypharmacy presenting to hospital with acute unselected medical or surgical illness. Prescribing cascades were identified using two predefined validated explicit cascade lists, i.e. ThinkCascades, and a list derived from a recently published systematic review of prescribing cascades in community-dwelling adults, referred to here as the 'Doherty list'. Potential prescribing cascades were classified as 'definite', 'probable', 'possible', 'uncertain' or 'indeterminate' according to pre-specified criteria.
Results: The study included 385 consecutive patients (55.1% female, mean age 80.2 years, standard deviation 7.3 years). A total of 281 potential prescribing cascades (drug A → drug B) were identified in 152 patients (39.4%). Probable or possible prescribing cascades were identified in 48 patients (12.4%) using the Doherty list and in 44 patients (11.4%) using ThinkCascades. Patients exposed to potential prescribing cascades experienced greater levels of polypharmacy than patients not exposed to prescribing cascades (median interquartile range [IQR] of 12 [9-14] daily drugs versus 9 [IQR 7-11], p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Potential prescribing cascades were highly prevalent in older hospitalised adults. Practical tools are needed to assist prescribers in prevention, recognition and management of inappropriate prescribing cascades.
{"title":"Detection of Potential Prescribing Cascades in Multimorbid Older Patients Hospitalised with Acute Illness-An Observational Prospective Prevalence Study.","authors":"Ruth Daunt, Siobhán McGettigan, Lorna Kelly, Denis Curtin, Denis O'Mahony","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01201-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01201-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescribing cascades occur when a new drug is prescribed to treat an adverse drug event caused by an existing medication, resulting in unnecessary, or potentially hazardous additional drugs. To date, there are no published studies assessing the prevalence of prescribing cascades in older hospitalised adults.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the prevalence of prescribing cascades in hospitalised older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study of adults aged ≥ 65 years with multimorbidity and polypharmacy presenting to hospital with acute unselected medical or surgical illness. Prescribing cascades were identified using two predefined validated explicit cascade lists, i.e. ThinkCascades, and a list derived from a recently published systematic review of prescribing cascades in community-dwelling adults, referred to here as the 'Doherty list'. Potential prescribing cascades were classified as 'definite', 'probable', 'possible', 'uncertain' or 'indeterminate' according to pre-specified criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 385 consecutive patients (55.1% female, mean age 80.2 years, standard deviation 7.3 years). A total of 281 potential prescribing cascades (drug A → drug B) were identified in 152 patients (39.4%). Probable or possible prescribing cascades were identified in 48 patients (12.4%) using the Doherty list and in 44 patients (11.4%) using ThinkCascades. Patients exposed to potential prescribing cascades experienced greater levels of polypharmacy than patients not exposed to prescribing cascades (median interquartile range [IQR] of 12 [9-14] daily drugs versus 9 [IQR 7-11], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Potential prescribing cascades were highly prevalent in older hospitalised adults. Practical tools are needed to assist prescribers in prevention, recognition and management of inappropriate prescribing cascades.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"535-546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149247/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143779432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-04-27DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01209-1
Bu B Yeap, Cammie Tran, Catherine M Douglass, John J McNeil
Testosterone is the classical male anabolic hormone, involved in sexual development, virilisation and regulation of body composition in adult men. Organic disease involving the hypothalamus, pituitary or testes may interfere with endogenous testosterone production. In such men, testosterone treatment effectively ameliorates symptoms and signs of androgen deficiency. However, non-gonadal factors including age, body mass index and medical comorbidities influence circulating testosterone, and older men have on average lower testosterone concentrations compared with younger men. In these men, testosterone treatment would be a pharmacological intervention requiring stringent justification via high-quality evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Recent RCTs show benefits of testosterone treatment to improve sexual function, anaemia and bone mineral density in older men, and to prevent or revert type 2 diabetes mellitus in men at high risk. Results from a large cardiovascular safety trial in men with or at risk of cardiovascular disease provide important reassurance as to cardiovascular and prostate safety of testosterone treatment. Key questions remain as to whether testosterone's anabolic and other effects can be used safely to counter reductions in lean mass associated with incretin-based weight loss medications in men with obesity, and whether it might prevent disabilities including frailty, osteoporotic fractures and dementia in older men generally. This last question could be answered by a new testosterone RCT, targeting men in the 65-80 years age bracket, which would necessarily be large and of extended duration. A composite endpoint could be used which integrates potential benefits and risks, such as disability-free survival.
{"title":"Testosterone Therapy in Older Men: Present and Future Considerations.","authors":"Bu B Yeap, Cammie Tran, Catherine M Douglass, John J McNeil","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01209-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01209-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Testosterone is the classical male anabolic hormone, involved in sexual development, virilisation and regulation of body composition in adult men. Organic disease involving the hypothalamus, pituitary or testes may interfere with endogenous testosterone production. In such men, testosterone treatment effectively ameliorates symptoms and signs of androgen deficiency. However, non-gonadal factors including age, body mass index and medical comorbidities influence circulating testosterone, and older men have on average lower testosterone concentrations compared with younger men. In these men, testosterone treatment would be a pharmacological intervention requiring stringent justification via high-quality evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Recent RCTs show benefits of testosterone treatment to improve sexual function, anaemia and bone mineral density in older men, and to prevent or revert type 2 diabetes mellitus in men at high risk. Results from a large cardiovascular safety trial in men with or at risk of cardiovascular disease provide important reassurance as to cardiovascular and prostate safety of testosterone treatment. Key questions remain as to whether testosterone's anabolic and other effects can be used safely to counter reductions in lean mass associated with incretin-based weight loss medications in men with obesity, and whether it might prevent disabilities including frailty, osteoporotic fractures and dementia in older men generally. This last question could be answered by a new testosterone RCT, targeting men in the 65-80 years age bracket, which would necessarily be large and of extended duration. A composite endpoint could be used which integrates potential benefits and risks, such as disability-free survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"501-512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148964/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143971884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-05-02DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01198-1
Joséphine Papet, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Hugo Dupuis
Objective: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) significantly impact quality of life in aging men. While monotherapies, including alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI), or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), are widely used, the potential benefits and risks of combination pharmacotherapies remain less well-documented. This study reviews and assesses the current evidence regarding the use of combination pharmacotherapies in the management of BPH-related LUTS to provide a comprehensive overview of their efficacy and safety profiles.
Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to June 2024. Studies were selected on the basis of predefined inclusion criteria, focusing on clinical outcomes such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urinary flow rate (Qmax), and quality of life. Data from 22 eligible studies were analyzed and summarized.
Results: Combination therapies, particularly those involving alpha-blockers and 5-ARI, demonstrated significant reductions in clinical progression, improvements in urinary flow, and symptom relief compared with monotherapies. Therapies combining alpha-blockers with anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or phytotherapeutic agents showed potential for targeting mixed symptoms, though evidence remains limited. Triple therapy studies are scarce, with benefits observed only in highly symptomatic or refractory cases.
Conclusions: Combination therapies for LUTS/BPH offer superior efficacy over monotherapy in certain cases, particularly with alpha-blockers and 5-ARI, which significantly reduce disease progression and symptoms. Other combinations, including alpha-blockers with anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or PDE5 inhibitors, provide potential benefits for patients with mixed symptom profiles, though evidence remains heterogeneous. The level of evidence among studies varies significantly, ranging from high-quality RCTs to lower-level observational data, requiring careful interpretation. While combination treatments improve outcomes, they also present challenges in adherence and side effects. A personalized and evidence-based approach is essential to optimize treatment selection and balance efficacy with tolerability.
{"title":"Combination Pharmacotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Evaluation of Existing Literature on Combination Therapies for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with BPH.","authors":"Joséphine Papet, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Hugo Dupuis","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01198-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01198-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) significantly impact quality of life in aging men. While monotherapies, including alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI), or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), are widely used, the potential benefits and risks of combination pharmacotherapies remain less well-documented. This study reviews and assesses the current evidence regarding the use of combination pharmacotherapies in the management of BPH-related LUTS to provide a comprehensive overview of their efficacy and safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in PubMed, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to June 2024. Studies were selected on the basis of predefined inclusion criteria, focusing on clinical outcomes such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urinary flow rate (Q<sub>max</sub>), and quality of life. Data from 22 eligible studies were analyzed and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combination therapies, particularly those involving alpha-blockers and 5-ARI, demonstrated significant reductions in clinical progression, improvements in urinary flow, and symptom relief compared with monotherapies. Therapies combining alpha-blockers with anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or phytotherapeutic agents showed potential for targeting mixed symptoms, though evidence remains limited. Triple therapy studies are scarce, with benefits observed only in highly symptomatic or refractory cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination therapies for LUTS/BPH offer superior efficacy over monotherapy in certain cases, particularly with alpha-blockers and 5-ARI, which significantly reduce disease progression and symptoms. Other combinations, including alpha-blockers with anticholinergics, beta-3 agonists, or PDE5 inhibitors, provide potential benefits for patients with mixed symptom profiles, though evidence remains heterogeneous. The level of evidence among studies varies significantly, ranging from high-quality RCTs to lower-level observational data, requiring careful interpretation. While combination treatments improve outcomes, they also present challenges in adherence and side effects. A personalized and evidence-based approach is essential to optimize treatment selection and balance efficacy with tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"527-534"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143964392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-04-24DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01207-3
Lauren J Sullivan, Christina M Mingora, Patrick A Flume
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited condition that leads to multiorgan dysfunction, especially in the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and reproductive tracts, with associated conditions including persistent pulmonary infection, liver disease, pancreatic insufficiency, and infertility. Historically, people with CF (pwCF) suffered a shortened lifespan due to complications of the condition, namely respiratory. The emphasis on center-based, multidisciplinary care and the widespread introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy has resulted in pwCF living longer and healthier lives. Now they may encounter some of the health and social issues associated with growing older, which previously were not a typical experience for this population. In this article, we review relevant health issues for the aging CF population, including complications that arise from the condition itself, issues encountered due to treatment, and general conditions associated with aging that may manifest earlier or differently in pwCF. We discuss the recommendations for screening and treatment of relevant conditions, and considerations for the integration of healthcare professionals across disciplines into the care of this population.
{"title":"The Aging Patient with Cystic Fibrosis.","authors":"Lauren J Sullivan, Christina M Mingora, Patrick A Flume","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01207-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01207-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited condition that leads to multiorgan dysfunction, especially in the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and reproductive tracts, with associated conditions including persistent pulmonary infection, liver disease, pancreatic insufficiency, and infertility. Historically, people with CF (pwCF) suffered a shortened lifespan due to complications of the condition, namely respiratory. The emphasis on center-based, multidisciplinary care and the widespread introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy has resulted in pwCF living longer and healthier lives. Now they may encounter some of the health and social issues associated with growing older, which previously were not a typical experience for this population. In this article, we review relevant health issues for the aging CF population, including complications that arise from the condition itself, issues encountered due to treatment, and general conditions associated with aging that may manifest earlier or differently in pwCF. We discuss the recommendations for screening and treatment of relevant conditions, and considerations for the integration of healthcare professionals across disciplines into the care of this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"513-525"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148974/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143982578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-03-31DOI: 10.1007/s40266-025-01192-7
Paul P Dobesh, Albert A Volkl, Ákos Ferenc Pap, C V Damaraju, Bennett Levitan, Zhong Yuan, Alpesh N Amin
Background: Both bleeding and adverse ischemic events increase with age, compounding the benefit-risk balance of anticoagulants in older patients. We present analyses using benefit-risk methods to better understand the age-dependence of the benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Methods: Randomized controlled trial data from the ROCKET-AF (NVAF) and EINSTEIN DVT, EINSTEIN PE, EINSTEIN-Extension, and EINSTEIN CHOICE in (VTE) were used. For ROCKET-AF, benefits and risks were assessed with incidence rates for key thrombotic and bleeding endpoints and a net clinical benefit (NCB) measure. Cumulative incidences (estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method) were estimated at day 185 for EINSTEIN and EINSTEIN Extension and 1 year for EINSTEIN CHOICE. Incidence differences were calculated for the overall population and age subgroups of < 65, 65-75, and > 75 years.
Results: In ROCKET-AF, rate differences in the composite NCB outcome (vascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, fatal bleeding, critical organ bleeding, and non-CNS systemic embolism) favored rivaroxaban overall and by age < 65, 65-75, and > 75 years (-84, -25, -61, and -150 cases per 10,000 patient-years, respectively). In the pooled EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies, cumulative incidence differences for the composite NCB outcome (recurrent VTE and major bleeding) were -103, 3, -105, and -544 per 10,000 patients, respectively. For extended VTE treatment with rivaroxaban versus placebo in EINSTEIN-Extension, NCB results were -536, -492, -556, and -601 per 10,000 patients, respectively. In the EINSTEIN CHOICE analysis, NCB favored rivaroxaban 20 mg versus aspirin (-284, -255, -339, and -338, respectively) and rivaroxaban 10 mg versus aspirin (-339, -328, -485, and -80, respectively).
Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated a positive benefit-risk profile with rivaroxaban versus trial comparators in older patients with NVAF or VTE, with benefit-risk increasingly favoring rivaroxaban with increasing age.
{"title":"Benefit-Risk Assessment of Rivaroxaban in Older Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation or Venous Thromboembolism.","authors":"Paul P Dobesh, Albert A Volkl, Ákos Ferenc Pap, C V Damaraju, Bennett Levitan, Zhong Yuan, Alpesh N Amin","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01192-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40266-025-01192-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both bleeding and adverse ischemic events increase with age, compounding the benefit-risk balance of anticoagulants in older patients. We present analyses using benefit-risk methods to better understand the age-dependence of the benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trial data from the ROCKET-AF (NVAF) and EINSTEIN DVT, EINSTEIN PE, EINSTEIN-Extension, and EINSTEIN CHOICE in (VTE) were used. For ROCKET-AF, benefits and risks were assessed with incidence rates for key thrombotic and bleeding endpoints and a net clinical benefit (NCB) measure. Cumulative incidences (estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method) were estimated at day 185 for EINSTEIN and EINSTEIN Extension and 1 year for EINSTEIN CHOICE. Incidence differences were calculated for the overall population and age subgroups of < 65, 65-75, and > 75 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In ROCKET-AF, rate differences in the composite NCB outcome (vascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, fatal bleeding, critical organ bleeding, and non-CNS systemic embolism) favored rivaroxaban overall and by age < 65, 65-75, and > 75 years (-84, -25, -61, and -150 cases per 10,000 patient-years, respectively). In the pooled EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies, cumulative incidence differences for the composite NCB outcome (recurrent VTE and major bleeding) were -103, 3, -105, and -544 per 10,000 patients, respectively. For extended VTE treatment with rivaroxaban versus placebo in EINSTEIN-Extension, NCB results were -536, -492, -556, and -601 per 10,000 patients, respectively. In the EINSTEIN CHOICE analysis, NCB favored rivaroxaban 20 mg versus aspirin (-284, -255, -339, and -338, respectively) and rivaroxaban 10 mg versus aspirin (-339, -328, -485, and -80, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis demonstrated a positive benefit-risk profile with rivaroxaban versus trial comparators in older patients with NVAF or VTE, with benefit-risk increasingly favoring rivaroxaban with increasing age.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>http://ClinicalTrials.gov , identifiers: NCT00403767 (ROCKET-AF), NCT00440193 (EINSTEIN DVT), NCT00439777 (EINSTEIN PE), NCT00439725 (EINSTEIN Extension), and NCT02064439 (EINSTEIN CHOICE).</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"469-484"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053352/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143751588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}