Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.46340/ephd.2022.8.2.3
Maryna Mаzur
The article is devoted to the conceptual analysis of the Jungian archetype, as the innate psychic structure of personality in the historical-philosophical context. Firstly, it was established a difference between instincts, as physiological manifestations of the libido (vital psychic energy), which can be embodied in symbolic images and fantasies and archetypes – psychic substrates, that are produced by the collective unconsciousness. Secondly, it is noted, that archetypes, as archaic prototypes can restore in human memory the sacred connection between past events and the present moment. Thirdly, it is shown, that the determining function of the archetype, as a «universal matrix», is the accumulation and translation (representation) of the collective experience of mankind. Fourthly, it is substantiated, that archetypes are genetically inherited psychic structures that influence human behavior and thinking. Fifthly, it is pointed out that archetypes are energetically powerful structure-forming elements of the collective unconsciousness, which can generate impulses capable to modify a person’s consciousness intentions. Sixthly, it is elucidated, that archetypes manifest in human consciousness in the form of a variety of psychic phenomena and emotional reactions, that can awaken intuition, which can warn a human even about mortal danger. Seventhly, it is specified, that the final stage in the process of individuation (development of the Self) is the integration of two opposing instances of the psyche of the personal unconsciousness and the collective unconscio usness, which takes place in the «territory of consciousness». Eighthly, it is emphasized, that the key mission of the hero is to pass the stage of initiation, which returns him to the archaic origins of being and is for him the pledge to the spiritual renewal and development of personality. Ninthly, it is revealed, that hero must make the right choice and step out of his own «comfort zone» into a new reality, which contributes to his self-improvement.
{"title":"THE QUINTESSENCE OF JUNGIAN ARCHETYPE AS INNATE PSYCHIC STRUCTURE OF PERSONALITY IN THE HISTORICAL-PHILOSOPHICAL CONTEXT","authors":"Maryna Mаzur","doi":"10.46340/ephd.2022.8.2.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46340/ephd.2022.8.2.3","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the conceptual analysis of the Jungian archetype, as the innate psychic structure of personality in the historical-philosophical context. Firstly, it was established a difference between instincts, as physiological manifestations of the libido (vital psychic energy), which can be embodied in symbolic images and fantasies and archetypes – psychic substrates, that are produced by the collective unconsciousness. Secondly, it is noted, that archetypes, as archaic prototypes can restore in human memory the sacred connection between past events and the present moment. Thirdly, it is shown, that the determining function of the archetype, as a «universal matrix», is the accumulation and translation (representation) of the collective experience of mankind. Fourthly, it is substantiated, that archetypes are genetically inherited psychic structures that influence human behavior and thinking. Fifthly, it is pointed out that archetypes are energetically powerful structure-forming elements of the collective unconsciousness, which can generate impulses capable to modify a person’s consciousness intentions. Sixthly, it is elucidated, that archetypes manifest in human consciousness in the form of a variety of psychic phenomena and emotional reactions, that can awaken intuition, which can warn a human even about mortal danger. Seventhly, it is specified, that the final stage in the process of individuation (development of the Self) is the integration of two opposing instances of the psyche of the personal unconsciousness and the collective unconscio usness, which takes place in the «territory of consciousness». Eighthly, it is emphasized, that the key mission of the hero is to pass the stage of initiation, which returns him to the archaic origins of being and is for him the pledge to the spiritual renewal and development of personality. Ninthly, it is revealed, that hero must make the right choice and step out of his own «comfort zone» into a new reality, which contributes to his self-improvement.","PeriodicalId":115449,"journal":{"name":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132681608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.46340/ephd.2021.8.1.11
Yaroslav Hnatiuk
This article analyzes the historical development of the philosophical logic syntax from the standpoint of the unity of historical and logical methods. According to this perspective, there are three types of logical syntax: the elementary subject-predicate, the modified definitive-specificative, and the standard propositional-functional. These types are generalized in the grammatical and mathematical styles of logical syntax. The main attention is paid to two scientific revolutions in elementary subject-predicate syntax, which led to the emergence of modified definitive-specific and standard propositional-functional syntaxes and created the syntactic conditions for the development of contemporary philosophical logic. The specifics of contemporary philosophical logic and the methodological possibilities of its application to philosophical discourse are studied. The article aims to reevaluate the undeservedly forgotten systems of philosophical logic of the continental tradition, created by such prominent representatives as Aristotle, G.W.F. Hegel, and E. Husserl, and to actualize these logics in the context of contemporary philosophical culture. The potential of the above-mentioned logics is not fully involved in the philosophical discourse of modernity, primarily because they primarily used an imperfect elementary subject-predicate syntax and modified definitive-specificative syntax as its slightly improved version. Both syntaxes have one thing in common: the grammatical style of sentence structure. Nevertheless, they also have one common flaw – a high dependence on grammar formalism. As a result, the interaction between these syntaxes and Frege ’ s standard propositional-functional syntax is impossible, because the latter is based on mathematical formalism, which operates on the philosophical logic of the analytic tradition. The article substantiates the way to solve this problem by constructing a modified subject-predicate syntax of contemporary philosophical logic. This syntax provides information interaction between Aristotle ’ s elementary subject-predicate syntax, and Frege ’ s standard propositional-functional syntax based on Hegel ’ s modified definitive-specificative syntax. The proposed solution to this problem can create new opportunities for complementarity and mutual enrichment between the philosophical logic of continental and analytical traditions. The theoretical basis for the construction and study of contemporary philosophical logic is a functional analysis of contemporary symbolic logic, which improves the grammatical analysis of traditional formal logic. Functional-grammatical analysis is a way to rehabilitate the philosophical logic of the continental tradition. The novelty of this paper lies in the substantiation of the modified subject-predicate syntax of contemporary philosophical logic. It makes it possible to establish a dialogue between continental and analytical traditions, which is designed to promote the further develo
{"title":"THE HISTORICAL SYNTAX OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC","authors":"Yaroslav Hnatiuk","doi":"10.46340/ephd.2021.8.1.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46340/ephd.2021.8.1.11","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the historical development of the philosophical logic syntax from the standpoint of the unity of historical and logical methods. According to this perspective, there are three types of logical syntax: the elementary subject-predicate, the modified definitive-specificative, and the standard propositional-functional. These types are generalized in the grammatical and mathematical styles of logical syntax. The main attention is paid to two scientific revolutions in elementary subject-predicate syntax, which led to the emergence of modified definitive-specific and standard propositional-functional syntaxes and created the syntactic conditions for the development of contemporary philosophical logic. The specifics of contemporary philosophical logic and the methodological possibilities of its application to philosophical discourse are studied. The article aims to reevaluate the undeservedly forgotten systems of philosophical logic of the continental tradition, created by such prominent representatives as Aristotle, G.W.F. Hegel, and E. Husserl, and to actualize these logics in the context of contemporary philosophical culture. The potential of the above-mentioned logics is not fully involved in the philosophical discourse of modernity, primarily because they primarily used an imperfect elementary subject-predicate syntax and modified definitive-specificative syntax as its slightly improved version. Both syntaxes have one thing in common: the grammatical style of sentence structure. Nevertheless, they also have one common flaw – a high dependence on grammar formalism. As a result, the interaction between these syntaxes and Frege ’ s standard propositional-functional syntax is impossible, because the latter is based on mathematical formalism, which operates on the philosophical logic of the analytic tradition. The article substantiates the way to solve this problem by constructing a modified subject-predicate syntax of contemporary philosophical logic. This syntax provides information interaction between Aristotle ’ s elementary subject-predicate syntax, and Frege ’ s standard propositional-functional syntax based on Hegel ’ s modified definitive-specificative syntax. The proposed solution to this problem can create new opportunities for complementarity and mutual enrichment between the philosophical logic of continental and analytical traditions. The theoretical basis for the construction and study of contemporary philosophical logic is a functional analysis of contemporary symbolic logic, which improves the grammatical analysis of traditional formal logic. Functional-grammatical analysis is a way to rehabilitate the philosophical logic of the continental tradition. The novelty of this paper lies in the substantiation of the modified subject-predicate syntax of contemporary philosophical logic. It makes it possible to establish a dialogue between continental and analytical traditions, which is designed to promote the further develo","PeriodicalId":115449,"journal":{"name":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132086995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.46340/ephd.2021.7.1.2
O. Levenets
{"title":"EDUCATION OF STUDENTS FROM UZBEKISTAN IN LESYA UKRAINKA STATE PEDAGODICAL INSTITUTE OF LUTSK IN 1966-1972: PECULIARITY OF EDUCATIONAL AND ASSIMILATION PROCESSES","authors":"O. Levenets","doi":"10.46340/ephd.2021.7.1.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46340/ephd.2021.7.1.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115449,"journal":{"name":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133768393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.46340/ephd.2021.7.3.2
O. Marchuk
{"title":"IVAN OHIIENKO’S CONTRIBUTION TO THE REFORMATION OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH MANAGEMENT IN UKRAINE (1919-1920)","authors":"O. Marchuk","doi":"10.46340/ephd.2021.7.3.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46340/ephd.2021.7.3.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115449,"journal":{"name":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116173253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.46340/ephd.2021.7.3.17
A. Vovk
{"title":"PHILOSOPHICAL METHODOLOGY OF VOLODYMYR SHYNKARUK","authors":"A. Vovk","doi":"10.46340/ephd.2021.7.3.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46340/ephd.2021.7.3.17","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115449,"journal":{"name":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114495940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.46340/ephd.2021.8.1.3
D. Burianov
{"title":"ACTIVITIES OF THE DEMOCRATIC RADICAL PARTY IN UKRAINE AND ITS PLACE AND ROLE IN STUDENT MOVEMENTS DURING THE FIRST REVOLUTION OF 1905-1907","authors":"D. Burianov","doi":"10.46340/ephd.2021.8.1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46340/ephd.2021.8.1.3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115449,"journal":{"name":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123984178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.46340/ephd.2021.7.3.19
Ihor Spaskyi
{"title":"SOFIA ONTOLOGIZATION OF THE ECONOMY IN THE PRACTICES OF PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTION OF ECONOMIC THINKING","authors":"Ihor Spaskyi","doi":"10.46340/ephd.2021.7.3.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46340/ephd.2021.7.3.19","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115449,"journal":{"name":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122931288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.46340/ephd.2021.7.2.1
Aliona Pokhodniakova
{"title":"RECONSTRUCTION OF THE HISTORY OF THE NABATAEANS ACCORDING TO THE EVIDENCE OF ANCIENT NARRATIVE SOURCES","authors":"Aliona Pokhodniakova","doi":"10.46340/ephd.2021.7.2.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46340/ephd.2021.7.2.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115449,"journal":{"name":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","volume":"70 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120898663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.46340/ephd.2023.9.2.2
Olena Moskalenko-Vysotska, Yurii Vysotskyi
{"title":"THE PLACE AND ROLE OF THE VERBAL DEFINITION OF THE OVERTASK IN THE ACTOR’S SCHOOL OF K. S. STANISLAVSKY","authors":"Olena Moskalenko-Vysotska, Yurii Vysotskyi","doi":"10.46340/ephd.2023.9.2.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46340/ephd.2023.9.2.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":115449,"journal":{"name":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116954448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：