Endoscopic Ultrasound最新文献

Background and objectives: Distal biliary strictures (DBSs) can be caused by various malignancies, making accurate and early diagnosis crucial. Histopathology is the gold standard for diagnosis, with several methods available for tissue sampling. This study evaluates the performance of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytologic smears and histopathology in diagnosing suspected malignant DBSs.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent EUS-FNA between January 2017 and January 2023 for DBSs. Demographic, imaging, procedural, and clinical data were collected. The diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA cytology, histology, and their combination was assessed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on imaging and endoscopy characteristics.

Results: EUS-FNA for cytology had a sensitivity of 69.1% and specificity of 97.5%. EUS-FNA histology had a sensitivity of 76.4% and specificity of 99.1%. There was no difference in diagnostic efficacy between the two above (P > 0.05). Combining cytology and histology improved sensitivity to 82%. When 20 cases (6.8%) with histological slide failures were considered as negative, histologic sensitivity was 69.1%, completely consistent with cytology alone (P = 1). The presence of a mass shadow on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was associated with higher cytologic diagnostic sensitivity compared with simple stenosis without a mass shadow (57.4% vs. 75.9%, P = 0.011). The larger the mass, the higher the cytologic diagnostic sensitivity. The radiologist's diagnostic imaging tendencies, that is, malignant, benign, and indeterminate, also affected cytologic diagnostic sensitivity (78.2% vs. 63.9% vs. 51.9%, P = 0.002). Furthermore, among our cohort of 118 patients diagnosed with benign DBSs, a notable subset of 33 individuals (28%) received a diagnosis of IgG4-related disease.

Conclusion: EUS-FNA histology combined with cytology was a reliable diagnostic method. There is no difference in diagnostic efficacy between EUS-FNA cytology and histology, irrespective of considering instances of histological slide failure. The presence of a mass shadow on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and the size of the mass influenced the diagnostic efficacy of cytology. Additionally, IgG4-related diseases, accounting for a significant proportion of cases, were important in the differential diagnosis of these strictures.

Background and objectives: EUS is recommended for guiding pancreatic tissue acquisition in suspected autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) cases. However, there is a lack of comparative research on the effectiveness between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing AIP in China. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) specifically for type 1 AIP.

Methods: Between 2010 and 2023, individuals with AIP who received EUS-TA at Changhai Hospital were included in the study.

Results: A total of 173 patients diagnosed with AIP who underwent EUS-TA were included in the final analysis. Of these, 104 patients (60.1%) received EUS-FNA, and 69 patients (39.9%) underwent EUS-FNB. Sufficient pancreatic tissue samples (>5 cells/high-power field) were obtained in 164 of 173 patients (94.8%), with success rates of 94.2% for EUS-FNA and 95.7% for EUS-FNB (P > 0.05). EUS-FNB exhibited higher rates of reliable level 1 histopathological findings (40.9% vs. 16.3%, P < 0.001) and reliable level 2 histopathological findings (33.3% vs. 12.2%, P < 0.001) compared with EUS-FNA. Furthermore, a higher occurrence of IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration (>10 cells/high-power field) was observed with EUS-FNB compared with EUS-FNA (74.2% vs. 27.9%, P < 0.001). The multivariate logistic analysis also revealed that EUS-FNA was less effective in obtaining reliable evidence compared with EUS-FNB, as evident in both level 2 (P = 0.002; odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.56) and level 1 (P = 0.001; odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.49) histopathological evidence.

Conclusions: EUS-FNB demonstrates higher rates of level 1 and level 2 histopathological findings, as well as more abundant IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration, compared with EUS-FNA.

Background and objectives: A majority of pancreatic malignancies are unresectable at the time of presentation and require EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration or fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) for diagnosis. With the advent of precision therapy, there is an increasing need to use EUS-FNA/FNB sample for genetic analysis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a preferred technology to detect genetic mutations with high sensitivity in small specimens. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the adequacy of EUS-FNA/FNB for NGS in pancreatic malignancies.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to November 11, 2023. The primary outcome was the proportion of sufficient sample acquired by EUS-FNA/FNB in pancreatic malignancies for NGS. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of sufficient sample for NGS in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the detection rates of mutations in KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 and actionable mutations in PDAC. The pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model. Potential sources of heterogeneity were investigated with subgroup analyses and meta-regression.

Results: Twenty studies with 881 samples were included. The pooled adequacy of EUS-FNA/FNB sample for NGS was 89.9% (95% CI, 80.8%-96.7%) in pancreatic malignancies and 92.0% (95% CI, 81.3%-98.8%) in PDAC. Screening sample suitability before NGS testing was associated with lower adequacy in subgroup analysis (79.7% vs. 98.4%, P = 0.001). The pooled prevalences of mutations in KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 in PDAC were 87.4% (95% CI, 83.2%-91.2%), 62.6% (95% CI, 53.2%-71.7%), 20.6% (95% CI, 11.9%-30.8%), and 19.4% (95% CI, 11.2%-29.1%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of potentially actionable mutations in PDAC was 14.5% (95% CI, 8.2%-22.0%).

Conclusions: In the majority of cases, EUS-FNA/FNB can acquire adequate sample for NGS and identify tumor-specific mutations in patients with pancreatic malignancies. Strict pre-analysis screening criteria may negatively impact the sample adequacy and the success rate for NGS.

Background and objectives: An accurate diagnosis is crucial for the clinical management of pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN). EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy (EUS-TTNB) is a novel technique for improving the accuracy of PCN diagnosis. There is insufficient evidence about the efficacy of EUS-TTNB. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of EUS-TTNB for PCN.

Methods: Between June 2015 and July 2023, we prospectively enrolled 454 patients with a clinical concern for PCN in our database. After excluding those diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, pseudocysts, or other no-neoplasms, we assessed 326 patients with 329 cysts undergoing EUS-guided fine-needle-aspiration (EUS-FNA) or EUS-TTNB for evaluation. The primary indicators were tissue acquisition yield and diagnostic yield. The cyst characteristics (size, location, the presence of septation, mural nodule, and solid mass) and the number of biopsy samples were chosen for the analysis of factors associated with diagnostic performance.

Results: There were 220 (67.5%) females and 106 (32.5%) males, and the median patient age was 50 years (range, 18-88). There were 329 cysts sampled by FNA and 143 by TTNB. The median cyst size was 31.5 mm (range, 6.9-114.0). The diagnostic yields of FNA and TTNB were 35.7% (112/314) and 57.5% (73/127), respectively (P < 0.001). Special cyst types were diagnosed by TTNB in 58 (45.7%, 58/127) cysts, 19 of which had surgical pathology. Fifteen of 19 TTNB diagnoses were concordant with the surgical pathology.

Conclusion: EUS-TTNB is an option to improve the diagnosis of PCN. Standardized procedures and appropriate indications for TTNB need to be studied.