Purpose: Older adult self-neglect, the inability to perform essential self-care, is an emerging public health problem. We aimed to evaluate imaging utilization and outcomes of patients with self-neglect compared to matched controls.
Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective study, conducted at two major academic medical centers, utilized the enterprise data warehouse to identify patients of > 60 years receiving a self-neglect mandate in the emergency department (ED) during 2019. Our study cohort consisted of 108 cases and 108 matched controls by age, gender, race, and time of ED presentation.
Results: During the index visit, cases had significantly higher imaging utilization (p < 0.001). Revisit and readmission rates over the 5-year study period were significantly higher among cases (526 versus 290 revisits (p < 0.001) and 254 versus 88 readmissions (p < 0.001)), with increased imaging utilization on follow-up for CT (p < 0.0001), X-ray (p < 0.0001), US (p < 0.0001), and MRI (p = 0.003). There were 44 deaths among cases versus 7 among controls. Subgroup analysis revealed that noncompliant cases had significantly higher CT use and an elevated mortality risk over the 5-year study period (both p = 0.02). Significantly higher number of cases lived alone (p < 0.001), had a higher substance use (p = 0.044), and had a higher prevalence of psychiatric illness (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Older adult self-neglect patients experience increased ED revisits/readmissions and use more imaging services yet exhibit poorer clinical outcomes, particularly those who do not adhere to discharge recommendations. Identifying at-risk patients and implementing early interventions can mitigate healthcare burdens and improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Imaging utilization and health outcomes for older adults with self-neglect mandates in the emergency department.","authors":"Sharmila Duraisamy, Haley Nicole Bayne, Zhou Lan, Omar Yaghi, Isabella Rose Pompa, Lisette Dunham, Karon Konner, Bharti Khurana","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02418-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02418-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Older adult self-neglect, the inability to perform essential self-care, is an emerging public health problem. We aimed to evaluate imaging utilization and outcomes of patients with self-neglect compared to matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This IRB-approved retrospective study, conducted at two major academic medical centers, utilized the enterprise data warehouse to identify patients of > 60 years receiving a self-neglect mandate in the emergency department (ED) during 2019. Our study cohort consisted of 108 cases and 108 matched controls by age, gender, race, and time of ED presentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the index visit, cases had significantly higher imaging utilization (p < 0.001). Revisit and readmission rates over the 5-year study period were significantly higher among cases (526 versus 290 revisits (p < 0.001) and 254 versus 88 readmissions (p < 0.001)), with increased imaging utilization on follow-up for CT (p < 0.0001), X-ray (p < 0.0001), US (p < 0.0001), and MRI (p = 0.003). There were 44 deaths among cases versus 7 among controls. Subgroup analysis revealed that noncompliant cases had significantly higher CT use and an elevated mortality risk over the 5-year study period (both p = 0.02). Significantly higher number of cases lived alone (p < 0.001), had a higher substance use (p = 0.044), and had a higher prevalence of psychiatric illness (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older adult self-neglect patients experience increased ED revisits/readmissions and use more imaging services yet exhibit poorer clinical outcomes, particularly those who do not adhere to discharge recommendations. Identifying at-risk patients and implementing early interventions can mitigate healthcare burdens and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1007/s10140-025-02425-3
Hassan Ou Hadda, Mustapha Zerfaoui, Karim Bahhous, Mohammed Talbi, Yassine Oulhouq, Abdeslem Rrhioua, Samir Didi, Dikra Bakari
Purpose: This study investigates how involuntary patient mis-centering affects dose distribution and image quality in computed tomography (CT), with the goal of reducing radiation exposure while preserving diagnostic performance.
Methods: Mis-centering was performed by shifting a Sun Nuclear CTDI phantom vertically and laterally, with dose recorded in specific phantom holes using a 10X6-3CT ionization chamber (Radcal). Measurements were performed on three CT scanners (Philips, FUJIFILM, Hitachi) under identical acquisition parameters. Additionally, a Philips system paired with a Catphan-503 phantom was used to assess image-quality changes. Dose ratios, calculated from absorbed dose measurements in multiple phantom holes, quantified the effect of off-center positioning.
Results: Peripheral doses were highly sensitive to displacement: a vertical offset above the isocenter reduced the dose by up to 35% at the point above the isocenter, while an increase was observed at symmetrical points, while a lateral offset reduced it by up to 18% at points in the direction of displacement. Image-quality metrics were affected to a lesser degree, likely because modern reconstruction algorithms partially compensate for mis-centering.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that deliberate mis-centering may be considered during follow-up CT examinations to spare radiation-sensitive regions without clinically significant loss of image quality.
{"title":"Phantom evaluation of involuntary mis-centering in CT Scan : consequences for radiation dose and image quality.","authors":"Hassan Ou Hadda, Mustapha Zerfaoui, Karim Bahhous, Mohammed Talbi, Yassine Oulhouq, Abdeslem Rrhioua, Samir Didi, Dikra Bakari","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02425-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02425-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates how involuntary patient mis-centering affects dose distribution and image quality in computed tomography (CT), with the goal of reducing radiation exposure while preserving diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mis-centering was performed by shifting a Sun Nuclear CTDI phantom vertically and laterally, with dose recorded in specific phantom holes using a 10X6-3CT ionization chamber (Radcal). Measurements were performed on three CT scanners (Philips, FUJIFILM, Hitachi) under identical acquisition parameters. Additionally, a Philips system paired with a Catphan-503 phantom was used to assess image-quality changes. Dose ratios, calculated from absorbed dose measurements in multiple phantom holes, quantified the effect of off-center positioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peripheral doses were highly sensitive to displacement: a vertical offset above the isocenter reduced the dose by up to 35% at the point above the isocenter, while an increase was observed at symmetrical points, while a lateral offset reduced it by up to 18% at points in the direction of displacement. Image-quality metrics were affected to a lesser degree, likely because modern reconstruction algorithms partially compensate for mis-centering.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that deliberate mis-centering may be considered during follow-up CT examinations to spare radiation-sensitive regions without clinically significant loss of image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145653913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-08DOI: 10.1007/s10140-025-02411-9
Sayed Borna Farzaneh, Edward Antram, Sarah Naunton, Arpan Patel, Obi Ajuluchukwu, Naren Govindarajah, Lakshmi Ratnam, Marco Bolgeri, Nirav Patel, Anita Wale
Purpose: To evaluate whether admission C-reactive protein (CRP) can triage patients with suspected renal colic to low dose non contrast CT KUB or contrast enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) at first presentation.
Methods: Retrospective single centre diagnostic accuracy study in a United Kingdom emergency department. Index test was admission CRP with a prespecified cut-off of 5 mg/L (positive if CRP ≥ 5 mg/L). Reference standard was CT classified a priori as: A normal, B simple calculus, C complicated calculus, D alternative acute diagnosis. The target condition for accuracy analyses was C or D. We constructed a 2 × 2 table and calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Of 1,096 CT examinations during the study window, 233 were for suspected renal colic; 58 patients met eligibility and had admission CRP available (29 with CRP < 5 mg/L and 29 with CRP ≥ 5 mg/L). The target condition was present in 26/58 (44.8%). Using CRP ≥ 5 mg/L, sensitivity was 0.73 (95% CI 0.54-0.86), specificity 0.69 (0.51-0.82), positive predictive value 0.66 (0.47-0.80), negative predictive value 0.76 (0.58-0.88), likelihood ratio positive 2.34 (1.16-4.70) and likelihood ratio negative 0.39 (0.20-0.77).
Conclusion: CRP provided modest but clinically interpretable probability shifts for complicated stones or alternative acute pathology. A CRP first approach may support initial imaging selection between CTAP and CT KUB. Prospective multicentre validation is required.
{"title":"\"CRP-first\" algorithm to guide imaging in suspected renal colic: a retrospective UK cohort study.","authors":"Sayed Borna Farzaneh, Edward Antram, Sarah Naunton, Arpan Patel, Obi Ajuluchukwu, Naren Govindarajah, Lakshmi Ratnam, Marco Bolgeri, Nirav Patel, Anita Wale","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02411-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-025-02411-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether admission C-reactive protein (CRP) can triage patients with suspected renal colic to low dose non contrast CT KUB or contrast enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) at first presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective single centre diagnostic accuracy study in a United Kingdom emergency department. Index test was admission CRP with a prespecified cut-off of 5 mg/L (positive if CRP ≥ 5 mg/L). Reference standard was CT classified a priori as: A normal, B simple calculus, C complicated calculus, D alternative acute diagnosis. The target condition for accuracy analyses was C or D. We constructed a 2 × 2 table and calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,096 CT examinations during the study window, 233 were for suspected renal colic; 58 patients met eligibility and had admission CRP available (29 with CRP < 5 mg/L and 29 with CRP ≥ 5 mg/L). The target condition was present in 26/58 (44.8%). Using CRP ≥ 5 mg/L, sensitivity was 0.73 (95% CI 0.54-0.86), specificity 0.69 (0.51-0.82), positive predictive value 0.66 (0.47-0.80), negative predictive value 0.76 (0.58-0.88), likelihood ratio positive 2.34 (1.16-4.70) and likelihood ratio negative 0.39 (0.20-0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRP provided modest but clinically interpretable probability shifts for complicated stones or alternative acute pathology. A CRP first approach may support initial imaging selection between CTAP and CT KUB. Prospective multicentre validation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"939-945"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12700957/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145470884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-17DOI: 10.1007/s10140-025-02382-x
Youssef Madkouri, Hamza Sekkat, Abdellah Khallouqi
Purpose: The widespread and growing use of computed tomography (CT) in emergency care across Morocco has raised critical concerns about radiation safety, particularly in the absence of national Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). Without DRLs tailored to specific clinical indications, it becomes difficult to identify unjustified dose variations and ensure safe practices. This study aims to establish Morocco's first national, clinical indication-based DRLs for adult head CT examinations, promoting radiation dose optimization and alignment with international safety standards.
Methods: A retrospective multicenter analysis was performed on 1,299 adult head CT examinations across 20 Moroccan hospitals. Clinical indications were categorized into seven groups: stroke, acute neurological symptoms, post-contrast imaging (tumor/abscess), CT angiography, oncology planning, sinus and temporal bone imaging. Key parameters and dose metrics were extracted and the 75th percentile (third quartile) of volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) distribution per indication was used to propose DRLs.
Results: DLP varied significantly across protocols (highest: oncology [1794.8 ± 128.8 mGy·cm]; lowest: temporal bone [398.4 ± 20.3 mGy·cm]). Geographic disparities emerged, with Agadir (2211 mGy·cm) and Al Hoceima (2204 mGy·cm) showing the highest doses versus Dakhla (790 mGy·cm). Stroke DLPs (880.7 ± 70.5 mGy·cm) were lower than some international benchmarks, reflecting protocol and regional differences in Moroccan practice.
Conclusion: The study establishes the first set of national, indication-specific DRLs for adult head CT. These benchmarks provide a foundational tool for dose optimization, helping radiology departments evaluate current practices, reduce unnecessary exposure and promote compliance with international guidelines.
{"title":"Establishment of the first National diagnostic reference levels by clinical indication for adult head computed tomography in morocco: A baseline study.","authors":"Youssef Madkouri, Hamza Sekkat, Abdellah Khallouqi","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02382-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-025-02382-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The widespread and growing use of computed tomography (CT) in emergency care across Morocco has raised critical concerns about radiation safety, particularly in the absence of national Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). Without DRLs tailored to specific clinical indications, it becomes difficult to identify unjustified dose variations and ensure safe practices. This study aims to establish Morocco's first national, clinical indication-based DRLs for adult head CT examinations, promoting radiation dose optimization and alignment with international safety standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicenter analysis was performed on 1,299 adult head CT examinations across 20 Moroccan hospitals. Clinical indications were categorized into seven groups: stroke, acute neurological symptoms, post-contrast imaging (tumor/abscess), CT angiography, oncology planning, sinus and temporal bone imaging. Key parameters and dose metrics were extracted and the 75th percentile (third quartile) of volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) distribution per indication was used to propose DRLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DLP varied significantly across protocols (highest: oncology [1794.8 ± 128.8 mGy·cm]; lowest: temporal bone [398.4 ± 20.3 mGy·cm]). Geographic disparities emerged, with Agadir (2211 mGy·cm) and Al Hoceima (2204 mGy·cm) showing the highest doses versus Dakhla (790 mGy·cm). Stroke DLPs (880.7 ± 70.5 mGy·cm) were lower than some international benchmarks, reflecting protocol and regional differences in Moroccan practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study establishes the first set of national, indication-specific DRLs for adult head CT. These benchmarks provide a foundational tool for dose optimization, helping radiology departments evaluate current practices, reduce unnecessary exposure and promote compliance with international guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"921-929"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145074539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acute enterocolitis encompasses a broad spectrum of conditions affecting the small and large bowel, frequently presenting with nonspecific symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Given the clinical overlap among infectious, inflammatory, immune-mediated, vascular, and miscellaneous etiologies, imaging plays a pivotal role in refining the differential diagnosis, identifying complications, and guiding timely management. Computed tomography (CT), owing to its accessibility and rapid acquisition, remains the cornerstone of imaging evaluation in acute settings. CT enables detailed assessment of bowel wall morphology, disease distribution, vascular involvement, and extraintestinal manifestations. While ancillary imaging modalities have a role in select scenarios, this review emphasizes a CT-focused approach tailored for acute care. We present a comprehensive, pattern-based review of the CT imaging features across various forms of acute enterocolitis, highlighting diagnostic hallmarks, interpretive pitfalls, and clinically relevant mimics. The included cases were encountered by the radiologists in their day-to day practice and included based on their ability to highlight the majority representative features of each pathology. Through the integration of structured tables, illustrative cases, and diagnostic tips, this article aims to enhance the radiologist's ability to recognize key imaging signatures, avoid diagnostic errors, and contribute meaningfully to multidisciplinary patient care.
{"title":"CT patterns of acute enterocolitis - a practical guide for the emergency radiologist.","authors":"Snehal Rathi, Garima Suman, Avinash Nehra, Pranav Ajmera, Ashish Khandelwal","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02407-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-025-02407-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute enterocolitis encompasses a broad spectrum of conditions affecting the small and large bowel, frequently presenting with nonspecific symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Given the clinical overlap among infectious, inflammatory, immune-mediated, vascular, and miscellaneous etiologies, imaging plays a pivotal role in refining the differential diagnosis, identifying complications, and guiding timely management. Computed tomography (CT), owing to its accessibility and rapid acquisition, remains the cornerstone of imaging evaluation in acute settings. CT enables detailed assessment of bowel wall morphology, disease distribution, vascular involvement, and extraintestinal manifestations. While ancillary imaging modalities have a role in select scenarios, this review emphasizes a CT-focused approach tailored for acute care. We present a comprehensive, pattern-based review of the CT imaging features across various forms of acute enterocolitis, highlighting diagnostic hallmarks, interpretive pitfalls, and clinically relevant mimics. The included cases were encountered by the radiologists in their day-to day practice and included based on their ability to highlight the majority representative features of each pathology. Through the integration of structured tables, illustrative cases, and diagnostic tips, this article aims to enhance the radiologist's ability to recognize key imaging signatures, avoid diagnostic errors, and contribute meaningfully to multidisciplinary patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"971-988"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145451259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-15DOI: 10.1007/s10140-025-02415-5
Kevin Pierre, Joseph Zhou, Allen Mao, Kyle See, Cooper Dean, Evelyn Anthony, Joseph R Grajo
Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of radiology residents and attending radiologists in detecting retained surgical items (RSIs) on intraoperative radiographs.
Methods: In this pilot study, 100 de-identified intraoperative radiographic cases (18 positive for RSIs, 82 negative) were reviewed. For each case, upper-level radiology resident (PGY-3 to PGY-5) and attending radiologist participants recorded the presence or absence of an RSI, their confidence on a three-point scale, and their decision time. We compared accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, confidence, and interpretation time between the two groups. We fit a multivariable logistic regression (fixed-effects GLM) to identify predictors of a correct interpretation, followed by a mixed-effects logistic regression (GLMM) with random intercepts for reader and case to account for clustering.
Results: A total of 1,178 interpretations were analyzed (619 from residents, 559 from attendings). There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between residents (94.2%) and attendings (94.3%) (Fisher's exact p = 0.84 for accuracy, 0.82 for sensitivity, and 0.74 for specificity). Attendings were slightly faster (median time 16.4s vs. 18.8s; p = 0.0038) and reported higher confidence (mean 2.65 vs. 2.52; p < 0.001). In the fixed-effects GLM, participant type was not associated with accuracy (resident vs. attending AOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.52-1.59, p = 0.76). Compared with 'unsure,' being 'somewhat confident' (AOR 9.75, 95% CI 4.72-20.4) and 'very confident' (AOR 20.9, 95% CI 9.71-46.4) markedly increased the odds of a correct interpretation (both p < 0.001). Longer response times were associated with lower odds of correctness (AOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94, p = 0.020). Aside from non-significant associations with response time and foreign-body type, findings were otherwise consistent in the mixed-effects model.
Conclusion: Upper-level radiology residents demonstrate diagnostic accuracy for detecting retained surgical items that is statistically indistinguishable from that of attending radiologists. These preliminary findings suggest that a resident-led preliminary interpretation model for RSI studies at the point of service is a feasible and potentially efficient approach that would not compromise patient safety.
目的:比较放射科住院医师与主治医师对术中x线片上残留手术项目(rsi)的诊断能力。方法:在这项初步研究中,回顾了100例术中去识别的x线片病例(18例RSIs阳性,82例RSIs阴性)。对于每个病例,高级放射科住院医师(PGY-3至PGY-5)和主治放射科医生参与者记录了RSI的存在或不存在、他们对三分制的信心以及他们的决策时间。我们比较了两组之间的准确性、敏感性、特异性、置信度和解释时间。我们拟合了一个多变量逻辑回归(固定效应GLM)来确定正确解释的预测因子,然后是一个混合效应逻辑回归(GLMM),为读者和案例提供随机截距来解释聚类。结果:共分析1178份解释(住院医师619份,主治医师559份)。住院医师(94.2%)和主治医师(94.3%)的诊断准确性无显著差异(准确性Fisher精确p = 0.84,敏感性p = 0.82,特异性p = 0.74)。主治医师的诊断速度略快(中位时间16.4s vs. 18.8s; p = 0.0038),报告的置信度更高(平均时间2.65 vs. 2.52; p结论:高水平放射科住院医师在检测残留手术物品方面的诊断准确性与主治放射科医师在统计上没有区别。这些初步研究结果表明,在服务点由住院医生主导的RSI研究初步解释模型是一种可行且潜在有效的方法,不会损害患者的安全。
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of radiology residents versus attending radiologists in detecting retained surgical items: a pilot study.","authors":"Kevin Pierre, Joseph Zhou, Allen Mao, Kyle See, Cooper Dean, Evelyn Anthony, Joseph R Grajo","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02415-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-025-02415-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the diagnostic performance of radiology residents and attending radiologists in detecting retained surgical items (RSIs) on intraoperative radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot study, 100 de-identified intraoperative radiographic cases (18 positive for RSIs, 82 negative) were reviewed. For each case, upper-level radiology resident (PGY-3 to PGY-5) and attending radiologist participants recorded the presence or absence of an RSI, their confidence on a three-point scale, and their decision time. We compared accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, confidence, and interpretation time between the two groups. We fit a multivariable logistic regression (fixed-effects GLM) to identify predictors of a correct interpretation, followed by a mixed-effects logistic regression (GLMM) with random intercepts for reader and case to account for clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,178 interpretations were analyzed (619 from residents, 559 from attendings). There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between residents (94.2%) and attendings (94.3%) (Fisher's exact p = 0.84 for accuracy, 0.82 for sensitivity, and 0.74 for specificity). Attendings were slightly faster (median time 16.4s vs. 18.8s; p = 0.0038) and reported higher confidence (mean 2.65 vs. 2.52; p < 0.001). In the fixed-effects GLM, participant type was not associated with accuracy (resident vs. attending AOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.52-1.59, p = 0.76). Compared with 'unsure,' being 'somewhat confident' (AOR 9.75, 95% CI 4.72-20.4) and 'very confident' (AOR 20.9, 95% CI 9.71-46.4) markedly increased the odds of a correct interpretation (both p < 0.001). Longer response times were associated with lower odds of correctness (AOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.94, p = 0.020). Aside from non-significant associations with response time and foreign-body type, findings were otherwise consistent in the mixed-effects model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upper-level radiology residents demonstrate diagnostic accuracy for detecting retained surgical items that is statistically indistinguishable from that of attending radiologists. These preliminary findings suggest that a resident-led preliminary interpretation model for RSI studies at the point of service is a feasible and potentially efficient approach that would not compromise patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"879-886"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145523289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-03DOI: 10.1007/s10140-025-02400-y
Sai P G Charan, Sunita Parmar, Jitender Saini, Harsh Deora
Background/purpose: Isolated oculomotor nerve palsy (ONP) following mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is rare and often presents diagnostic challenges. Typically associated with diffuse axonal injury and poor prognosis, ONP lacks comprehensive radiological documentation when no skull base fractures along the course of the 3rd Nerve or brainstem injuries are evident. This study explores the diagnostic utility of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in identifying ONP cases in mild TBI patients.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on six patients diagnosed with isolated ONP after mild TBI, with no evident skull base fractures along the course of the 3rd Nerve or brainstem findings. All patients underwent CE-MRI to identify structural or vascular anomalies along the course of the third cranial nerve. Clinical presentations, imaging findings, and outcomes were meticulously documented and reviewed by a neuroradiologist.
Results: CE-MRI findings revealed consistent abnormalities in all cases. Thickening, blooming, and post-contrast enhancement of the cisternal portion of the third cranial nerve were observed, with two cases demonstrating extension into orbital segments. Despite the absence of fractures or direct injuries, partial recovery was noted in most cases, facilitated by targeted steroid therapy in some instances. These imaging patterns suggest indirect mechanisms such as traction, vascular compromise, or intraneural hemorrhage as potential causes of ONP.
Conclusions: High-resolution CE-MRI proves instrumental in diagnosing isolated ONP in mild TBI patients, even without conventional radiological indicators. Early imaging and intervention may improve recovery outcomes. This study underscores the significance of including CE-MRI in evaluation protocols for ONP. It highlights the importance of further research to unravel the underlying pathophysiology and optimize therapeutic approaches for these patients.
{"title":"Isolated oculomotor nerve palsy following mild traumatic brain injury: diagnostic challenges and insights from High-Resolution MRI.","authors":"Sai P G Charan, Sunita Parmar, Jitender Saini, Harsh Deora","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02400-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-025-02400-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Isolated oculomotor nerve palsy (ONP) following mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) is rare and often presents diagnostic challenges. Typically associated with diffuse axonal injury and poor prognosis, ONP lacks comprehensive radiological documentation when no skull base fractures along the course of the 3rd Nerve or brainstem injuries are evident. This study explores the diagnostic utility of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) in identifying ONP cases in mild TBI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on six patients diagnosed with isolated ONP after mild TBI, with no evident skull base fractures along the course of the 3rd Nerve or brainstem findings. All patients underwent CE-MRI to identify structural or vascular anomalies along the course of the third cranial nerve. Clinical presentations, imaging findings, and outcomes were meticulously documented and reviewed by a neuroradiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CE-MRI findings revealed consistent abnormalities in all cases. Thickening, blooming, and post-contrast enhancement of the cisternal portion of the third cranial nerve were observed, with two cases demonstrating extension into orbital segments. Despite the absence of fractures or direct injuries, partial recovery was noted in most cases, facilitated by targeted steroid therapy in some instances. These imaging patterns suggest indirect mechanisms such as traction, vascular compromise, or intraneural hemorrhage as potential causes of ONP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-resolution CE-MRI proves instrumental in diagnosing isolated ONP in mild TBI patients, even without conventional radiological indicators. Early imaging and intervention may improve recovery outcomes. This study underscores the significance of including CE-MRI in evaluation protocols for ONP. It highlights the importance of further research to unravel the underlying pathophysiology and optimize therapeutic approaches for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"909-920"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145430703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Meniscal injuries are a common cause of knee dysfunction and healthcare utilization, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the diagnostic gold standard. However, MRI's cost, limited accessibility, and contraindications of MRI have prompted interest in ultrasound (US) as a more affordable, portable, and radiation-free alternative. This review aimed to synthesize the current evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of US for meniscal tears and to define its role alongside MRI and arthroscopy in clinical practice.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed from January 2020 to March 2025 for English-language studies of adult patients (>18 years) undergoing US assessment of suspected meniscal injuries. Eligible studies used MRI or surgical (arthroscopic or open) findings as reference standards. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts, extracted the study characteristics and diagnostic metrics, and tabulated the results.
Results: Six studies comprising 499 participants met the inclusion criteria. US sensitivity for detecting meniscal tears ranged from 63% to 92.9%, and specificity from 63.6% to100%, with higher performance for medial than for lateral tears. Point-of-care US in emergency settings demonstrated sensitivities up to 92.9% and specificities up to 88.9%. Community-based US yielded specificity ≥97% for medial tears.
Conclusion: US exhibits clinically acceptable diagnostic accuracy for meniscal injury, particularly when high-frequency probes and experienced operators are used. However, future research should focus on large-scale standardized trials to refine scanning protocols, quantify learning curves, and develop guidelines for integrating US into meniscal injury trajectories.
{"title":"Evaluating the diagnostic value of ultrasound in meniscal injury detection: current evidence and future directions.","authors":"Reza Gerami, Amir Nezami Asl, Mostafa Shahrezaee, Jalal Kargar, Farshad Riahi","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02395-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-025-02395-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Meniscal injuries are a common cause of knee dysfunction and healthcare utilization, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the diagnostic gold standard. However, MRI's cost, limited accessibility, and contraindications of MRI have prompted interest in ultrasound (US) as a more affordable, portable, and radiation-free alternative. This review aimed to synthesize the current evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of US for meniscal tears and to define its role alongside MRI and arthroscopy in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed from January 2020 to March 2025 for English-language studies of adult patients (>18 years) undergoing US assessment of suspected meniscal injuries. Eligible studies used MRI or surgical (arthroscopic or open) findings as reference standards. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts, extracted the study characteristics and diagnostic metrics, and tabulated the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies comprising 499 participants met the inclusion criteria. US sensitivity for detecting meniscal tears ranged from 63% to 92.9%, and specificity from 63.6% to100%, with higher performance for medial than for lateral tears. Point-of-care US in emergency settings demonstrated sensitivities up to 92.9% and specificities up to 88.9%. Community-based US yielded specificity ≥97% for medial tears.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US exhibits clinically acceptable diagnostic accuracy for meniscal injury, particularly when high-frequency probes and experienced operators are used. However, future research should focus on large-scale standardized trials to refine scanning protocols, quantify learning curves, and develop guidelines for integrating US into meniscal injury trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"947-957"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145250490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-13DOI: 10.1007/s10140-025-02403-9
Husam H Mansour, Noor Khairiah A Karim, Noor Diyana Osman, Rohayu Hami, Yasser S Alajerami, Mahmoud Mousa
Purpose: To assess the prognostic value of automated quantitative chest CT metrics in predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted through the emergency department in a resource-limited setting in Gaza.
Methods: This retrospective study included 300 adult patients with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia who underwent non-contrast chest CT upon hospital admission. Automated quantitative lung metrics were derived using LungCTAnalyzer, an open-source 3D Slicer extension. Metrics included functional lung volume, affected lung volume, and the COVID-Q index (affected-to-functional lung ratio). Patients were stratified by survival status, and outcomes were analyzed using ROC curves, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and log-rank testing.
Results: Among the cohort, 112 patients (37.3%) died during hospitalization. Non-survivors were older and more likely to require advanced respiratory support (p < 0.001). Quantitative CT analysis revealed significantly reduced functional lung volume (47.2% vs. 73.9%) and increased affected lung volume (52.8% vs. 26.1%) in non-survivors (p < 0.001). The COVID-Q index was markedly higher in the deceased group. ROC analysis showed good predictive performance for total affected lung volume (AUC = 0.756; 95% CI: 0.696-0.815), with an optimal threshold of approximately 42%. Right lung involvement was associated with the poorest survival outcomes (log-rank = 67.6, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Automated quantitative chest CT provides objective, reproducible metrics for early mortality risk stratification in COVID-19 pneumonia. The use of open-source tools like LungCTAnalyzer may assist emergency radiologists in prioritizing care in resource-constrained and conflict-affected healthcare systems.
{"title":"Automated quantitative chest CT for mortality prediction in COVID-19 patients in a resource-limited emergency setting in Gaza: a retrospective study using LungCTAnalyzer.","authors":"Husam H Mansour, Noor Khairiah A Karim, Noor Diyana Osman, Rohayu Hami, Yasser S Alajerami, Mahmoud Mousa","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02403-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-025-02403-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the prognostic value of automated quantitative chest CT metrics in predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted through the emergency department in a resource-limited setting in Gaza.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 300 adult patients with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia who underwent non-contrast chest CT upon hospital admission. Automated quantitative lung metrics were derived using LungCTAnalyzer, an open-source 3D Slicer extension. Metrics included functional lung volume, affected lung volume, and the COVID-Q index (affected-to-functional lung ratio). Patients were stratified by survival status, and outcomes were analyzed using ROC curves, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and log-rank testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the cohort, 112 patients (37.3%) died during hospitalization. Non-survivors were older and more likely to require advanced respiratory support (p < 0.001). Quantitative CT analysis revealed significantly reduced functional lung volume (47.2% vs. 73.9%) and increased affected lung volume (52.8% vs. 26.1%) in non-survivors (p < 0.001). The COVID-Q index was markedly higher in the deceased group. ROC analysis showed good predictive performance for total affected lung volume (AUC = 0.756; 95% CI: 0.696-0.815), with an optimal threshold of approximately 42%. Right lung involvement was associated with the poorest survival outcomes (log-rank = 67.6, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automated quantitative chest CT provides objective, reproducible metrics for early mortality risk stratification in COVID-19 pneumonia. The use of open-source tools like LungCTAnalyzer may assist emergency radiologists in prioritizing care in resource-constrained and conflict-affected healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"887-898"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145279124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-30DOI: 10.1007/s10140-025-02383-w
Mohammad Yasrab, Zahra F Rahmatullah, Linda C Chu, Satomi Kawamoto, Elliot K Fishman
Spontaneous or atraumatic rupture of the spleen is an uncommon but potentially fatal abdominal emergency, often overshadowed by trauma-related etiologies. However, a wide range of infectious, neoplastic, vascular, autoimmune, and iatrogenic conditions can predispose the spleen to rupture without direct trauma. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the preferred modality for evaluating these cases, offering rapid, high-resolution assessment of hemorrhage-with or without active bleeding-and associated parenchymal abnormalities. This pictorial review highlights the diverse spectrum of underlying causes and characteristic imaging findings through 13 cases. It also outlines CT acquisition protocols, postprocessing techniques, and key clinical features that radiologists must be aware of to reach timely diagnoses and guide management. Early recognition and identification of the underlying pathology are critical in improving patient outcomes and directing appropriate interventions.
{"title":"CT of spontaneous atraumatic splenic rupture: etiologies and imaging findings.","authors":"Mohammad Yasrab, Zahra F Rahmatullah, Linda C Chu, Satomi Kawamoto, Elliot K Fishman","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02383-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10140-025-02383-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spontaneous or atraumatic rupture of the spleen is an uncommon but potentially fatal abdominal emergency, often overshadowed by trauma-related etiologies. However, a wide range of infectious, neoplastic, vascular, autoimmune, and iatrogenic conditions can predispose the spleen to rupture without direct trauma. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the preferred modality for evaluating these cases, offering rapid, high-resolution assessment of hemorrhage-with or without active bleeding-and associated parenchymal abnormalities. This pictorial review highlights the diverse spectrum of underlying causes and characteristic imaging findings through 13 cases. It also outlines CT acquisition protocols, postprocessing techniques, and key clinical features that radiologists must be aware of to reach timely diagnoses and guide management. Early recognition and identification of the underlying pathology are critical in improving patient outcomes and directing appropriate interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1005-1018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145198926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}