Bailey Braaten, E. Dringenberg, A. Kramer, R. Kajfez
{"title":"You’re an Engineer? You Must Be Really Smart! A Theoretical Discussion of the Need to Integrate “Smart” into Engineering Identity Research","authors":"Bailey Braaten, E. Dringenberg, A. Kramer, R. Kajfez","doi":"10.21061/see.86","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21061/see.86","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":117277,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Engineering Education","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128554386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
H. Rodríguez-Simmonds, Allison Godwin, T. Langus, N. Pearson, Adam Kirn
Background: Teamwork is a commonplace component of engineering practice. Engineering educators have been studying ways to make teams more effective and inclusive. However, students’ interpersonal interactions often create exclusionary experiences. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study investigates how the team formation process and what kinds of teaming practices and behaviors promote inclusive team environments. We were sensitized to Tuckman and Jensen’s (1977) revised theory of the five stages of teaming along with opportunity structures theory as frameworks to study how particular team interactions did or did not promote the inclusion of its members. Design/Method: This interpretive multi-case study used team observations, classroom artifacts, and student interviews in a first-year engineering course to understand the experiences of three teams. The primary data source, student interviews, were analyzed to understand the individual and collective team experience. These results were triangulated with the other data sources to build three team descriptions and a cross-team comparison. Results: Our findings indicate that the process of storming and norming in teams is an essential point in which social inclusion is built into teaming practices or not. While all teams, regardless of inclusive behaviors, were academically successful, the inclusive norms developed by some teams increased student learning and belonging. Conclusions: The emphasis on teaming in engineering education has often focused on the effectiveness of teams for a final project. However, the process of teaming and how peers shape the engineering environment is just as important for student’s belonging and persistence. The results of this work can provide strategies for supporting students’ teaming processes to develop more inclusive teams.
背景:团队合作是工程实践中常见的组成部分。工程教育工作者一直在研究如何让团队更有效、更包容。然而，学生的人际交往往往会产生排他性的体验。目的/假设:本研究旨在探讨团队的形成过程，以及什么样的团队实践和行为能够促进包容性的团队环境。我们对塔克曼和詹森(Tuckman and Jensen, 1977)修订的团队合作五阶段理论以及作为框架的机会结构理论很敏感，这些理论研究了特定的团队互动如何促进或不促进其成员的包容性。设计/方法:这个解释性的多案例研究使用了一年级工程课程中的团队观察、课堂人工制品和学生访谈来了解三个团队的经验。主要的数据来源，学生访谈，进行分析，以了解个人和集体团队的经验。这些结果与其他数据源进行三角测量，以建立三个团队描述和跨团队比较。结果:我们的研究结果表明，团队中的风暴和规范过程是社会包容是否融入团队实践的关键因素。虽然所有的团队，不管包容性行为如何，在学业上都是成功的，但一些团队制定的包容性规范增加了学生的学习和归属感。结论:在工程教育中，团队合作的重点往往集中在团队在最终项目中的有效性上。然而，团队合作的过程以及同伴如何塑造工程环境对学生的归属感和毅力同样重要。这项工作的结果可以为支持学生的团队合作过程提供策略，以发展更具包容性的团队。
{"title":"Building Inclusion in Engineering Teaming Practices","authors":"H. Rodríguez-Simmonds, Allison Godwin, T. Langus, N. Pearson, Adam Kirn","doi":"10.21061/see.84","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21061/see.84","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Teamwork is a commonplace component of engineering practice. Engineering educators have been studying ways to make teams more effective and inclusive. However, students’ interpersonal interactions often create exclusionary experiences. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study investigates how the team formation process and what kinds of teaming practices and behaviors promote inclusive team environments. We were sensitized to Tuckman and Jensen’s (1977) revised theory of the five stages of teaming along with opportunity structures theory as frameworks to study how particular team interactions did or did not promote the inclusion of its members. Design/Method: This interpretive multi-case study used team observations, classroom artifacts, and student interviews in a first-year engineering course to understand the experiences of three teams. The primary data source, student interviews, were analyzed to understand the individual and collective team experience. These results were triangulated with the other data sources to build three team descriptions and a cross-team comparison. Results: Our findings indicate that the process of storming and norming in teams is an essential point in which social inclusion is built into teaming practices or not. While all teams, regardless of inclusive behaviors, were academically successful, the inclusive norms developed by some teams increased student learning and belonging. Conclusions: The emphasis on teaming in engineering education has often focused on the effectiveness of teams for a final project. However, the process of teaming and how peers shape the engineering environment is just as important for student’s belonging and persistence. The results of this work can provide strategies for supporting students’ teaming processes to develop more inclusive teams.","PeriodicalId":117277,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Engineering Education","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115500866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gretchen A. Dietz, Randy Brown, E. Douglas, Erica D. McCray, Paul G. Richardson
{"title":"Manifestations of Racism in the Engineering Workplace","authors":"Gretchen A. Dietz, Randy Brown, E. Douglas, Erica D. McCray, Paul G. Richardson","doi":"10.21061/see.77","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21061/see.77","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":117277,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Engineering Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130338270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding Access to Learning Opportunities in Collaborative Projects: Gendered Social Hierarchies in Student Teams","authors":"Trevion S. Henderson","doi":"10.21061/see.101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21061/see.101","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":117277,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Engineering Education","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129448973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding the Impact of Product Characteristics on Groups’ Collaboration During a Dissection Task","authors":"T. Tucker, M. Goldstein, Emma Mercier","doi":"10.21061/see.98","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21061/see.98","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":117277,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Engineering Education","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130255434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：