Pascal Vranckx, David Morrow, Sean van Diepen, Frederik H Verbrugge
{"title":"'Shocking' disparities and promising prognostics: advances in resuscitation science.","authors":"Pascal Vranckx, David Morrow, Sean van Diepen, Frederik H Verbrugge","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf106","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":"14 10","pages":"579-580"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145274082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christopher Schenck, Soumya Banna, Noah Kim, Christine Nguyen, Emily J Gilmore, David M Greer, Rachel Beekman, P Elliott Miller
Aims: Changes in ventricular repolarisation, observed as QTc prolongation, are frequently observed following cardiac arrest. The T-peak to T-end (TpTe) interval represents a period of increased susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia. We posit that TpTe prolongation may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.
Methods and results: We included patients aged ≥18 years with both out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) who had an electrocardiogram (ECG) obtained within 24 h following ROSC. The first ECG obtained was evaluated to determine the QTc and TpTe intervals. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between prolongation of the QTc and TpTe intervals and clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality and favourable neurologic outcome at hospital discharge). We included 443 patients, with a median age of 61 years (IQR: 50-72 years), 60.5% male, 65.7% OHCA, and 29.8% with initial shockable rhythm. Overall, 310 patients had QTc prolongation (70.0%), and 284 had TpTe prolongation (64.1%). Patients with TpTe prolongation had a greater incidence of initial shockable rhythm (35.6% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001) and higher initial lactate (8.6 vs. 7.4 mmol/L, P = 0.03). QTc prolongation was not associated with in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR):1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-2.14, P = 0.37] or favourable neurologic outcome (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.50-1.54, P = 0.65). TpTe prolongation was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.01-2.85, P = 0.05) but not favourable neurologic outcome (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.45-1.37, P = 0.39).
Conclusion: TpTe interval prolongation, but not QTc interval prolongation, was associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.
背景:在心脏骤停后经常观察到心室复极的变化,如QTc延长。t峰至t端(TpTe)间期代表室性心律失常易感性增加的时期。我们认为,TpTe延长可能与心脏骤停复苏患者的不良临床结果有关。方法:我们纳入年龄≥18岁的院外和院内自发循环恢复(ROSC)后心脏骤停患者,并在ROSC后24小时内获得心电图(ECG)。评估第一次获得的心电图以确定QTc和TpTe间期。使用分层逻辑回归来评估QTc和TpTe间隔延长与临床结局(院内死亡率和出院时良好的神经系统结局)之间的关系。结果:我们纳入443例患者,中位年龄61岁(IQR: 50-72岁),60.5%为男性,65.7%为OHCA, 29.8%为初始休克性心律。总体而言,QTc延长310例(70.0%),TpTe延长284例(64.1%)。TpTe间期延长的患者初始震荡节律发生率更高(35.6% vs 19.5%)。结论:TpTe间期延长与心脏骤停复苏患者住院死亡率增加相关,而QTc间期延长与此无关。
{"title":"Repolarisation abnormalities and outcomes among patients with cardiac arrest.","authors":"Christopher Schenck, Soumya Banna, Noah Kim, Christine Nguyen, Emily J Gilmore, David M Greer, Rachel Beekman, P Elliott Miller","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf077","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Changes in ventricular repolarisation, observed as QTc prolongation, are frequently observed following cardiac arrest. The T-peak to T-end (TpTe) interval represents a period of increased susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia. We posit that TpTe prolongation may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We included patients aged ≥18 years with both out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) who had an electrocardiogram (ECG) obtained within 24 h following ROSC. The first ECG obtained was evaluated to determine the QTc and TpTe intervals. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between prolongation of the QTc and TpTe intervals and clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality and favourable neurologic outcome at hospital discharge). We included 443 patients, with a median age of 61 years (IQR: 50-72 years), 60.5% male, 65.7% OHCA, and 29.8% with initial shockable rhythm. Overall, 310 patients had QTc prolongation (70.0%), and 284 had TpTe prolongation (64.1%). Patients with TpTe prolongation had a greater incidence of initial shockable rhythm (35.6% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001) and higher initial lactate (8.6 vs. 7.4 mmol/L, P = 0.03). QTc prolongation was not associated with in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR):1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-2.14, P = 0.37] or favourable neurologic outcome (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.50-1.54, P = 0.65). TpTe prolongation was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.01-2.85, P = 0.05) but not favourable neurologic outcome (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.45-1.37, P = 0.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TpTe interval prolongation, but not QTc interval prolongation, was associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.</p>","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":" ","pages":"603-609"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144157437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Intravenous vasodilators in acute heart failure: is there still room for an old weapon? Two experts share their insights.","authors":"Alessandro Galluzzo, Janine Pöss","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf112","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf112","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":" ","pages":"635-637"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144947530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"In perspective: slow is safe, fast is final-timing matters in fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease.","authors":"Marco Valgimigli, David A Morrow","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf115","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf115","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":" ","pages":"565-567"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144991808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pascal Vranckx, David Morrow, Sean van Diepen, Frederik H Verbrugge
{"title":"Savouring the latest in acute cardiovascular care: fresh from Madrid.","authors":"Pascal Vranckx, David Morrow, Sean van Diepen, Frederik H Verbrugge","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf105","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":"14 9","pages":"509-510"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145237833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christina Byrne, Carlo A Barcella, Maria Lukacs Krogager, Manan Pareek, Kristian Bundgaard Ringgren, Mads Wissenberg, Fredrik Folke, Gunnar Gislason, Lars Køber, Jesper Kjærgaard, Christian Hassager, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Gregory Y H Lip, Kristian Kragholm
Aims: The NULL-PLEASE score (Non-shockable rhythm, Unwitnessed arrest, Long no-flow or Long low-flow period, blood pH <7.2, Lactate >7.0 mmol/L, End-stage renal disease on dialysis, Age ≥85 years, Still resuscitation, and Extracardiac cause) was developed to predict survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Because survival differs between sexes, we aimed to validate NULL-PLEASE separately in men and women.
Methods and results: Men and women with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation at hospital arrival from 2001 to 2019 were identified using Danish nationwide registries. The primary outcome was 1-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were defined as 30-day mortality and the combination of 1-year mortality or anoxic brain damage. Logistic regression was used for outcome risk estimation (reference: NULL-PLEASE = 0). Interaction analyses were performed between the NULL-PLEASE score and sex. The predictive ability was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUCROC) curves. We included 2599 men and 1280 women. One-day mortality for men and women was 36% and 50%; 30-day mortality was 56% and 71%; and 63% and 78% experienced the combined 1-year outcome. AUCROC values for 1-day mortality were for men: 0.828 (95% CI: 0.813-0.844); and for women: 0.754 (95% CI: 0.728-0.780). Results were similar for secondary outcomes. We found significant interaction between the NULL-PLEASE score and sex: 1-day mortality: P < 0.001, 30-day mortality: P = 0.04, combined outcome: P = 0.09.
Conclusion: In a nationwide OHCA-cohort, the predictive ability of the NULL-PLEASE score was higher in men than in women.
{"title":"External validation of the simple NULL-PLEASE clinical score in predicting outcomes in men and women with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide registry-based study.","authors":"Christina Byrne, Carlo A Barcella, Maria Lukacs Krogager, Manan Pareek, Kristian Bundgaard Ringgren, Mads Wissenberg, Fredrik Folke, Gunnar Gislason, Lars Køber, Jesper Kjærgaard, Christian Hassager, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Gregory Y H Lip, Kristian Kragholm","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf069","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf069","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The NULL-PLEASE score (Non-shockable rhythm, Unwitnessed arrest, Long no-flow or Long low-flow period, blood pH <7.2, Lactate >7.0 mmol/L, End-stage renal disease on dialysis, Age ≥85 years, Still resuscitation, and Extracardiac cause) was developed to predict survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Because survival differs between sexes, we aimed to validate NULL-PLEASE separately in men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Men and women with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation at hospital arrival from 2001 to 2019 were identified using Danish nationwide registries. The primary outcome was 1-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were defined as 30-day mortality and the combination of 1-year mortality or anoxic brain damage. Logistic regression was used for outcome risk estimation (reference: NULL-PLEASE = 0). Interaction analyses were performed between the NULL-PLEASE score and sex. The predictive ability was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUCROC) curves. We included 2599 men and 1280 women. One-day mortality for men and women was 36% and 50%; 30-day mortality was 56% and 71%; and 63% and 78% experienced the combined 1-year outcome. AUCROC values for 1-day mortality were for men: 0.828 (95% CI: 0.813-0.844); and for women: 0.754 (95% CI: 0.728-0.780). Results were similar for secondary outcomes. We found significant interaction between the NULL-PLEASE score and sex: 1-day mortality: P < 0.001, 30-day mortality: P = 0.04, combined outcome: P = 0.09.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a nationwide OHCA-cohort, the predictive ability of the NULL-PLEASE score was higher in men than in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":" ","pages":"522-530"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143990483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jakob Josiassen, Jacob E Møller, Henrik Schmidt, Rasmus P Beske, Johannes Grand, Jesper Kjaergaard, Christian Hassager
Aims: This study aimed to assess mortality rates in resuscitated comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with and without diabetes randomized to targets of blood pressure, oxygen, and duration of fever prevention.
Methods and results: Diabetic and non-diabetic patients from the BOX trial were compared. The BOX trial was a randomized, controlled, multicentre study comparing two mean arterial blood pressure targets (63 vs. 77 mmHg) in a double-blinded intervention and two open-labelled targets including a liberal and restrictive oxygenation (9-10 vs. 13-14 kPa) target and two regimes for length of fever control (36 vs. 72 h). The primary outcome for this substudy is 365-day survival. Multiple logistic regression models were used to adjust for factors known to be associated with outcome including age, sex, witnessed arrest (y/n), and time to return of spontaneous circulation (min). A total of 110 (14%) patients had pre-existing diabetes. Compared with the non-diabetic group, the patients with diabetes were older [median years (IQR) 67 (59; 73) vs. 63 (53; 72)] and had more comorbidities. The diabetic patients had an overall increased 365-day all-cause mortality (45% vs. 34%, P = 0.02). The logistic regression model adjusting for age and sex, witnessed arrest (y/n), and place of arrest gave an estimated adjusted odds ratio of 1.47 (0.93-2.30) (P = 0.10). No significant interactions were observed among interventions and outcomes related to diabetes status, P ranging from 0.10 to 0.80.
Conclusion: Pre-existing diabetes was associated with an increased crude 365-day mortality. No differences in outcome were observed among diabetic OHCA patients depending on the assessed blood pressure targets, oxygen levels, and durations of fever control.
背景和目的:本研究旨在评估有或无糖尿病的院外昏迷心脏骤停患者的复苏死亡率,随机分为血压、氧气和发热预防时间。方法:对BOX试验中的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者进行比较。BOX试验是一项随机、对照、多中心研究,比较双盲干预中的两个平均动脉血压目标(63vs77 mm Hg)和两个开放标记目标,包括自由氧合和限制性氧合目标(9-10vs13-14 kPa)和两种发烧控制时间(36vs72小时)。该亚研究的主要终点是365天的生存期。使用多元逻辑回归模型来调整已知与结果相关的因素,包括年龄、性别、目睹骤停(y/n)和自然循环恢复时间(min)。结果:共有110例(14%)患者既往存在糖尿病。与非糖尿病组相比,糖尿病患者年龄更大(中位年龄(IQR) 67 (59;73) vs 63(53;72))并且有更多的合并症。糖尿病患者365天全因死亡率总体增加(45% vs 34%, p=0.02)。对年龄、性别、目击逮捕(y/n)和逮捕地点进行调整后的logistic回归模型估计校正优势比为1.47 (0.93-2.30),p=0.10。干预措施和与糖尿病状况相关的结果之间没有观察到显著的相互作用,p值范围为0.10至0.80。结论:先前存在的糖尿病与增加的365天粗死亡率相关。根据评估的血压目标、氧水平和发烧控制时间,没有观察到糖尿病OHCA患者的结局差异。
{"title":"Diabetes in resuscitated comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a substudy of the randomized BOX trial.","authors":"Jakob Josiassen, Jacob E Møller, Henrik Schmidt, Rasmus P Beske, Johannes Grand, Jesper Kjaergaard, Christian Hassager","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf073","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess mortality rates in resuscitated comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with and without diabetes randomized to targets of blood pressure, oxygen, and duration of fever prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Diabetic and non-diabetic patients from the BOX trial were compared. The BOX trial was a randomized, controlled, multicentre study comparing two mean arterial blood pressure targets (63 vs. 77 mmHg) in a double-blinded intervention and two open-labelled targets including a liberal and restrictive oxygenation (9-10 vs. 13-14 kPa) target and two regimes for length of fever control (36 vs. 72 h). The primary outcome for this substudy is 365-day survival. Multiple logistic regression models were used to adjust for factors known to be associated with outcome including age, sex, witnessed arrest (y/n), and time to return of spontaneous circulation (min). A total of 110 (14%) patients had pre-existing diabetes. Compared with the non-diabetic group, the patients with diabetes were older [median years (IQR) 67 (59; 73) vs. 63 (53; 72)] and had more comorbidities. The diabetic patients had an overall increased 365-day all-cause mortality (45% vs. 34%, P = 0.02). The logistic regression model adjusting for age and sex, witnessed arrest (y/n), and place of arrest gave an estimated adjusted odds ratio of 1.47 (0.93-2.30) (P = 0.10). No significant interactions were observed among interventions and outcomes related to diabetes status, P ranging from 0.10 to 0.80.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-existing diabetes was associated with an increased crude 365-day mortality. No differences in outcome were observed among diabetic OHCA patients depending on the assessed blood pressure targets, oxygen levels, and durations of fever control.</p>","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":" ","pages":"531-539"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143985811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}