Nikolaus Marx, Katharina Schütt, Dirk Müller-Wieland, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, William G Herrington, Ramzi A Ajjan, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Bianca Rocca, Naveed Sattar, Laurent Fauchier, Maddalena Lettino, Massimo Federici
ESC Guidelines provide best practice, evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating patients with cardiovascular diseases. It is not always possible for best practices to be followed, however, particularly in low-resource settings. To address this issue, a set of guideline-related documents were created to identify key priorities for users in these settings. The documents highlight the related recommendations and describe key strategies for clinicians to approach implementation of these recommendations or discuss alternatives which are in line with the intention of the recommendations, if not having all of the same advantages. The suggestions cannot be used as exact substitutes for the original recommendations in the guidelines, which have not been altered and continue to reflect best practice. This document on key priorities for low-resource settings was developed by the task force Chairs and other members of the task force who produced the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes, which are freely available on the ESC website (https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines). The document also underwent external review, including international experts from within and beyond Europe and ESC partner organizations, including the Interamerican Society of Cardiology, the Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology, and the Asean Federation of Cardiology.
{"title":"Key priorities for the implementation of the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes in low-resource settings.","authors":"Nikolaus Marx, Katharina Schütt, Dirk Müller-Wieland, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, William G Herrington, Ramzi A Ajjan, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Bianca Rocca, Naveed Sattar, Laurent Fauchier, Maddalena Lettino, Massimo Federici","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae105","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ESC Guidelines provide best practice, evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating patients with cardiovascular diseases. It is not always possible for best practices to be followed, however, particularly in low-resource settings. To address this issue, a set of guideline-related documents were created to identify key priorities for users in these settings. The documents highlight the related recommendations and describe key strategies for clinicians to approach implementation of these recommendations or discuss alternatives which are in line with the intention of the recommendations, if not having all of the same advantages. The suggestions cannot be used as exact substitutes for the original recommendations in the guidelines, which have not been altered and continue to reflect best practice. This document on key priorities for low-resource settings was developed by the task force Chairs and other members of the task force who produced the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes, which are freely available on the ESC website (https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines). The document also underwent external review, including international experts from within and beyond Europe and ESC partner organizations, including the Interamerican Society of Cardiology, the Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology, and the Asean Federation of Cardiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"868-874"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143729444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tatendashe B Dondo, Theresa Munyombwe, Ben Hurdus, Suleman Aktaa, Marlous Hall, Anzhela Soloveva, Ramesh Nadarajah, Mohammad Haris, Robert M West, Alistair S Hall, Chris P Gale
Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients following myocardial infarction (MI) is frequently impaired. We investigated the association of baseline and changes in HRQoL with mortality following MI.
Methods and results: Nationwide longitudinal study of 9474 patients admitted to 77 hospitals in England as part of the Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events study. Self-reported HRQoL was collected using EuroQol EQ-5D-3L during hospitalization and at 1, 6, and 12 months following discharge. The data was analysed using flexible parametric and multilevel survival models. Of 9474 individuals with MI, 2360 (25%) were women and 2135 (22.5%) died during the 9-year follow-up period. HRQoL improved over 12 months (baseline mean, mean increase: EQ-5D 0.76, 0.003 per month; EQ-VAS 69.0, 0.5 per month). At baseline, better HRQoL was inversely associated with mortality [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.55, 95% CI 0.47-0.63], and problems with self-care (HR 1.73, 1.56-1.92), mobility (1.65, 1.50-1.81), usual activities (1.34, 1.23-1.47), and pain/discomfort (1.34, 1.22-1.46) were associated with increased mortality. Deterioration in mobility, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and self-care over 12 months were associated with increased mortality (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.31-1.58; 1.21, 1.11-1.32; 1.20, 1.10-1.32; 1.44, 1.30-1.59, respectively).
Conclusion: After MI, poor HRQoL at baseline, its dimensions, and deterioration over time are associated with an increased risk of mortality. Measuring HRQoL in routine clinical practice after MI could identify at-risk groups for interventions to improve prognosis.
{"title":"Association of baseline and changes in health-related quality of life with mortality following myocardial infarction: multicentre longitudinal linked cohort study.","authors":"Tatendashe B Dondo, Theresa Munyombwe, Ben Hurdus, Suleman Aktaa, Marlous Hall, Anzhela Soloveva, Ramesh Nadarajah, Mohammad Haris, Robert M West, Alistair S Hall, Chris P Gale","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae036","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients following myocardial infarction (MI) is frequently impaired. We investigated the association of baseline and changes in HRQoL with mortality following MI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Nationwide longitudinal study of 9474 patients admitted to 77 hospitals in England as part of the Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events study. Self-reported HRQoL was collected using EuroQol EQ-5D-3L during hospitalization and at 1, 6, and 12 months following discharge. The data was analysed using flexible parametric and multilevel survival models. Of 9474 individuals with MI, 2360 (25%) were women and 2135 (22.5%) died during the 9-year follow-up period. HRQoL improved over 12 months (baseline mean, mean increase: EQ-5D 0.76, 0.003 per month; EQ-VAS 69.0, 0.5 per month). At baseline, better HRQoL was inversely associated with mortality [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.55, 95% CI 0.47-0.63], and problems with self-care (HR 1.73, 1.56-1.92), mobility (1.65, 1.50-1.81), usual activities (1.34, 1.23-1.47), and pain/discomfort (1.34, 1.22-1.46) were associated with increased mortality. Deterioration in mobility, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and self-care over 12 months were associated with increased mortality (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.31-1.58; 1.21, 1.11-1.32; 1.20, 1.10-1.32; 1.44, 1.30-1.59, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After MI, poor HRQoL at baseline, its dimensions, and deterioration over time are associated with an increased risk of mortality. Measuring HRQoL in routine clinical practice after MI could identify at-risk groups for interventions to improve prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"730-738"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445645/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142105628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel A Gomes, Sanjali A C Ahuja, Yi Ting Yu, Robert English, Mahmood Ahmad, Mohammed Khanji, Pedro Adragão, Rui Providência
Introduction: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) regularly publish guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease. By definition, a guideline should follow strict methodological criteria, and have a transparent, traceable, and reproducible development process. We aimed to assess the overall strength of the recommendations and rigour of methodological development in ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines.
Methods and results: A systematic review of ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines published from 2013 to 2024 was conducted. Documents class of recommendation (COR) and level of evidence (LOE) of recommendations were included. For each document, data regarding citation count (ISI and Scholar), and COR and LOE of the recommendations were extracted. Guidelines were assessed for rigour of methodological development using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Among the 76 included guidelines, the average citation-per-year was 344 (ISI) and 681 (Scholar). Forty-nine per cent of the recommendations were classified as COR I (strong recommendations), while 46% were based solely on expert opinion (LOE C). The overall AGREE II methodology domain score was 29 ± 6 (range 7-56), with the lowest performance for the domains of systematic search of evidence, use of pre-defined criteria for selecting the evidence and external review. Both the strength of the recommendations and rigour of development showed a stable trend over the past 12 years. ACC/AHA guidelines followed more rigorous development methods compared with ESC (AGREE II 36 ± 3 vs. 24 ± 3).
Conclusions: Clinical guidelines from the main European and American cardiovascular societies are highly cited but show significant limitations in methodological rigour.
简介:ESC和ACC/AHA定期发布心血管疾病管理指南。根据定义,指南应该遵循严格的方法标准,并具有透明、可跟踪和可重复的开发过程。我们的目的是评估ESC和ACC/AHA指南中建议的总体强度和方法发展的严谨性。方法:对2013 - 2024年发表的ESC和ACC/AHA指南进行系统回顾。包括建议的文献推荐等级(COR)和证据水平(LOE)。对于每篇文献,提取了有关被引数(ISI和Scholar)以及推荐的COR和LOE的数据。使用研究与评估指南评估II (AGREE II)工具评估指南方法开发的严谨性。结果:在纳入的76份指南中,ISI的平均年引用量为344次,Scholar的平均年引用量为681次。49%的建议被归类为COR I(强烈建议),而46%的建议仅基于专家意见(LOE C)。总体AGREE II方法领域得分为29±6(范围7-56),在系统搜索证据、使用预定义标准选择证据和外部审查领域表现最差。在过去12年中,建议的力度和发展的严谨性都显示出稳定的趋势。与ESC相比,ACC/AHA指南遵循更严格的开发方法(AGREE II 36±3 vs 24±3)。结论:来自主要欧洲和美国心血管学会的临床指南被高度引用,但在方法学严谨性方面存在显着局限性。
{"title":"Rigour of development of European Society of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines over a 12-year period (2013-2024): a systematic review of guidelines.","authors":"Daniel A Gomes, Sanjali A C Ahuja, Yi Ting Yu, Robert English, Mahmood Ahmad, Mohammed Khanji, Pedro Adragão, Rui Providência","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae113","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae113","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) regularly publish guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease. By definition, a guideline should follow strict methodological criteria, and have a transparent, traceable, and reproducible development process. We aimed to assess the overall strength of the recommendations and rigour of methodological development in ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A systematic review of ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines published from 2013 to 2024 was conducted. Documents class of recommendation (COR) and level of evidence (LOE) of recommendations were included. For each document, data regarding citation count (ISI and Scholar), and COR and LOE of the recommendations were extracted. Guidelines were assessed for rigour of methodological development using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Among the 76 included guidelines, the average citation-per-year was 344 (ISI) and 681 (Scholar). Forty-nine per cent of the recommendations were classified as COR I (strong recommendations), while 46% were based solely on expert opinion (LOE C). The overall AGREE II methodology domain score was 29 ± 6 (range 7-56), with the lowest performance for the domains of systematic search of evidence, use of pre-defined criteria for selecting the evidence and external review. Both the strength of the recommendations and rigour of development showed a stable trend over the past 12 years. ACC/AHA guidelines followed more rigorous development methods compared with ESC (AGREE II 36 ± 3 vs. 24 ± 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical guidelines from the main European and American cardiovascular societies are highly cited but show significant limitations in methodological rigour.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"875-885"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445687/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarena La, Rosanna Tavella, Jing Wu, John A Spertus, Sivabaskari Pasupathy, Olivia Girolamo, Christopher Zeitz, Matthew Worthley, Margaret Arstall, Ajay Sinhal, John F Beltrame
Background and aims: In patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for the investigation of angina, the management pathways for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) are well described, whereas the clinical and diagnostic journey of patients with Angina with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA) has largely been inferred, as there is limited quantitative data. To compare the journey of patients with ANOCA vs. obstructive CAD, particularly in relation to (i) clinical presentation, and (ii) diagnostic assessment, (iii) 12 month patient-reported outcome measures, and (iv) 3-year composite major adverse cardiovascular events.
Methods and results: A total of 2285 ANOCA and 4087 obstructive CAD consecutive patients were included from the CADOSA (Coronary Angiogram Database of South Australia) registry between 2012 and 2018. At presentation for elective invasive angiography, the chest pain features and non-invasive ischaemic markers were indistinguishable between patients with obstructive CAD and ANOCA, although the latter were younger (67 ± 11 vs. 61 ± 11 years, P < 0.001), more likely to be female (27 vs. 58%, P < 0.001) and have fewer traditional cardiac risk factors. However, following angiography (compared to those with obstructive CAD), patients with ANOCA were less likely to attain a cardiac discharge diagnosis (100 vs. 22%) or receive anti-anginal therapy (76 vs. 57%), despite the same prevalence of persistent angina (weekly angina: 10 vs. 11% over 12 months).
Conclusion: Although the pre-angiography journey (symptoms and non-invasive ischaemic investigations) of patients with obstructive CAD and ANOCA is indistinguishable, the post-angiography journey is portrayed by a vast diagnostic and treatment gap in those with ANOCA, which needs to be addressed.
{"title":"The patient journey in chronic coronary syndromes with/without obstructive coronary arteries.","authors":"Sarena La, Rosanna Tavella, Jing Wu, John A Spertus, Sivabaskari Pasupathy, Olivia Girolamo, Christopher Zeitz, Matthew Worthley, Margaret Arstall, Ajay Sinhal, John F Beltrame","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf012","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>In patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for the investigation of angina, the management pathways for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) are well described, whereas the clinical and diagnostic journey of patients with Angina with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA) has largely been inferred, as there is limited quantitative data. To compare the journey of patients with ANOCA vs. obstructive CAD, particularly in relation to (i) clinical presentation, and (ii) diagnostic assessment, (iii) 12 month patient-reported outcome measures, and (iv) 3-year composite major adverse cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A total of 2285 ANOCA and 4087 obstructive CAD consecutive patients were included from the CADOSA (Coronary Angiogram Database of South Australia) registry between 2012 and 2018. At presentation for elective invasive angiography, the chest pain features and non-invasive ischaemic markers were indistinguishable between patients with obstructive CAD and ANOCA, although the latter were younger (67 ± 11 vs. 61 ± 11 years, P < 0.001), more likely to be female (27 vs. 58%, P < 0.001) and have fewer traditional cardiac risk factors. However, following angiography (compared to those with obstructive CAD), patients with ANOCA were less likely to attain a cardiac discharge diagnosis (100 vs. 22%) or receive anti-anginal therapy (76 vs. 57%), despite the same prevalence of persistent angina (weekly angina: 10 vs. 11% over 12 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the pre-angiography journey (symptoms and non-invasive ischaemic investigations) of patients with obstructive CAD and ANOCA is indistinguishable, the post-angiography journey is portrayed by a vast diagnostic and treatment gap in those with ANOCA, which needs to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"806-815"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445655/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143491185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: There are currently no specialized risk scoring systems for critically ill patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Arterial stiffness, as measured by estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV), has emerged as a potential indicator of mortality or adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with CHD. This study aimed to evaluate the association between ePWV and all-cause mortality among critically ill patients with CHD beyond traditional risk scores.
Methods and results: This study included 11 001 participants with CHD from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV, with a 1-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Elevated ePWV was significantly associated with higher risks of in-hospital [odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.17, P < 0.001] and 1-year (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% CI 1.20-1.23, P < 0.001) mortality. These associations remained consistent when adjusted for traditional risk scores and potential confounders. When ePWV was integrated into traditional risk scoring models (Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Acute Physiology Score III, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and Logistic Organ Dysfunction System score), the predictive accuracy (area under the curve: 64.55-70.56, 64.32-72.51, 72.35-75.80, 55.58-67.68, 71.27-73.53, and 67.24-73.40, P < 0.001) and reclassification (net reclassification index: 0.230, 0.268, 0.257, 0.255, 0.221, and 0.254; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.049, 0.072, 0.054, 0.068, 0.037, and 0.061, P < 0.001) of these models significantly improved for 1-year mortality. Similar results were also found for in-hospital mortality.
Conclusions: Estimated pulse wave velocity is a strong independent predictor of both short- and long-term mortality in critically ill patients with CHD. Importantly, integrating ePWV into traditional risk scores significantly boosts the predictive accuracy for 1-year and in-hospital all-cause mortality.
背景:目前还没有专门针对冠心病(CHD)重症患者的风险评分系统。以估计脉搏波速度(ePWV)测量的动脉僵化已成为冠心病患者死亡率或不良心血管事件的潜在指标。本研究旨在评估患有冠心病的重症患者中 ePWV 与全因死亡率之间的关系,而非传统的风险评分:这项研究纳入了 11 001 名重症监护医学信息中心 IV 的 CHD 患者,并进行了为期一年的随访。主要终点是一年的全因死亡率,次要终点是院内死亡率:结果:ePWV 升高与较高的院内死亡率风险显著相关(OR 1.15,95% CI 1.12-1.17,p 结论:ePWV 是预测患有心脏病的重症患者短期和长期死亡率的一个强有力的独立指标。重要的是,将 ePWV 纳入传统的风险评分可显著提高对一年死亡率和院内全因死亡率的预测准确性。
{"title":"Prognostic significance of estimated pulse wave velocity in critically ill patients with coronary heart disease: analysis from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database.","authors":"Yingzhen Gu, Xiaorong Han, Jinxing Liu, Yifan Li, Zuozhi Li, Wei Zhang, Naqiang Lv, Aimin Dang","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae076","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are currently no specialized risk scoring systems for critically ill patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Arterial stiffness, as measured by estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV), has emerged as a potential indicator of mortality or adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with CHD. This study aimed to evaluate the association between ePWV and all-cause mortality among critically ill patients with CHD beyond traditional risk scores.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This study included 11 001 participants with CHD from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV, with a 1-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Elevated ePWV was significantly associated with higher risks of in-hospital [odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.17, P < 0.001] and 1-year (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% CI 1.20-1.23, P < 0.001) mortality. These associations remained consistent when adjusted for traditional risk scores and potential confounders. When ePWV was integrated into traditional risk scoring models (Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Acute Physiology Score III, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and Logistic Organ Dysfunction System score), the predictive accuracy (area under the curve: 64.55-70.56, 64.32-72.51, 72.35-75.80, 55.58-67.68, 71.27-73.53, and 67.24-73.40, P < 0.001) and reclassification (net reclassification index: 0.230, 0.268, 0.257, 0.255, 0.221, and 0.254; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.049, 0.072, 0.054, 0.068, 0.037, and 0.061, P < 0.001) of these models significantly improved for 1-year mortality. Similar results were also found for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Estimated pulse wave velocity is a strong independent predictor of both short- and long-term mortality in critically ill patients with CHD. Importantly, integrating ePWV into traditional risk scores significantly boosts the predictive accuracy for 1-year and in-hospital all-cause mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"739-746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Robert Byrne, J J Coughlan, Xavier Rossello, Borja Ibanez
ESC Guidelines provide best practice, evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating patients with cardiovascular diseases. It is not always possible for best practices to be followed, however, particularly in low-resource settings. To address this issue, a set of guideline-related documents were created to identify key priorities for users in these settings. The documents highlight the related recommendations and describe key strategies for clinicians to approach implementation of these recommendations or discuss alternatives which are in line with the intention of the recommendations, if not having all of the same advantages. The suggestions cannot be used as exact substitutes for the original recommendations in the guidelines, which have not been altered and continue to reflect best practice. This document on key priorities for low-resource settings was developed by the task force Chairs and other members of the task force who produced the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes, which are freely available on the ESC website (https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines). This document also underwent external review including international experts from within and beyond Europe and ESC partner organizations, including the Interamerican Society of Cardiology (IASC), the Pan-African Society of Cardiology (PASCAR), the Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology (APSC), and the ASEAN Federation of Cardiology (AFC).
{"title":"Key priorities for the implementation of the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in low-resource settings.","authors":"Robert Byrne, J J Coughlan, Xavier Rossello, Borja Ibanez","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae107","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ESC Guidelines provide best practice, evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating patients with cardiovascular diseases. It is not always possible for best practices to be followed, however, particularly in low-resource settings. To address this issue, a set of guideline-related documents were created to identify key priorities for users in these settings. The documents highlight the related recommendations and describe key strategies for clinicians to approach implementation of these recommendations or discuss alternatives which are in line with the intention of the recommendations, if not having all of the same advantages. The suggestions cannot be used as exact substitutes for the original recommendations in the guidelines, which have not been altered and continue to reflect best practice. This document on key priorities for low-resource settings was developed by the task force Chairs and other members of the task force who produced the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes, which are freely available on the ESC website (https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines). This document also underwent external review including international experts from within and beyond Europe and ESC partner organizations, including the Interamerican Society of Cardiology (IASC), the Pan-African Society of Cardiology (PASCAR), the Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology (APSC), and the ASEAN Federation of Cardiology (AFC).</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"766-772"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143729432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Birgit Markus, Nikolaos Patsalis, Charlotte Müller, Georgios Chatzis, Leona Möller, Rosita Rupa, Simon Viniol, Susanne Betz, Bernhard Schieffer, Julian Kreutz
Background: Despite continuous advances in post-resuscitation management, the outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is limited. To improve the outcome, interdisciplinary cardiac arrest centres (CACs) have been established in recent years, but survival remains low, and treatment strategies vary considerably in clinical and geographical aspects. Here we analysed a strategy of in-hospital post-resuscitation management while evaluating the outcome.
Methods: A broad spectrum of pre- and in-hospital parameters of 545 resuscitated patients admitted to the Cardiac Arrest Center of the University Hospital of Marburg between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Inclusion criteria were ≥18 years, resuscitation by emergency medical services, and non-traumatic cause of OHCA.
Results: In the overall patient cohort, the survival rate to hospital discharge was 39.8% (n = 217/545), which is 50.7% higher than in the EuReCa-TWO registry. A total of 77.2% of the survivors had CPC status 1 or 2 (favourable neurological outcome) before and after therapy. A standardized 'therapy bundle' for in-hospital post-resuscitation management was applied to 445 patients who survived the initial treatment in the emergency department. In addition to basic care (standardized antimicrobial therapy, adequate anticoagulation, targeted sedation, early enteral, and parenteral nutrition), it includes early whole-body CT (n = 391; 87.9%), invasive coronary diagnostics (n = 322; 72.4%), targeted temperature management (n = 293; 65.8%), and if indicated, mechanical circulatory support (n = 145; 32.6%), and appropriate neurological diagnostics.
Conclusions: Early goal-directed post-resuscitation management in a well-established and highly frequented CAC leads to significantly higher survival rates. However, our results underline the need for a broader standardization in post-resuscitation management to ultimately improve the outcome.
{"title":"Early goal-directed management after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: lessons from a certified cardiac arrest centre.","authors":"Birgit Markus, Nikolaos Patsalis, Charlotte Müller, Georgios Chatzis, Leona Möller, Rosita Rupa, Simon Viniol, Susanne Betz, Bernhard Schieffer, Julian Kreutz","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae032","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite continuous advances in post-resuscitation management, the outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is limited. To improve the outcome, interdisciplinary cardiac arrest centres (CACs) have been established in recent years, but survival remains low, and treatment strategies vary considerably in clinical and geographical aspects. Here we analysed a strategy of in-hospital post-resuscitation management while evaluating the outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A broad spectrum of pre- and in-hospital parameters of 545 resuscitated patients admitted to the Cardiac Arrest Center of the University Hospital of Marburg between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Inclusion criteria were ≥18 years, resuscitation by emergency medical services, and non-traumatic cause of OHCA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the overall patient cohort, the survival rate to hospital discharge was 39.8% (n = 217/545), which is 50.7% higher than in the EuReCa-TWO registry. A total of 77.2% of the survivors had CPC status 1 or 2 (favourable neurological outcome) before and after therapy. A standardized 'therapy bundle' for in-hospital post-resuscitation management was applied to 445 patients who survived the initial treatment in the emergency department. In addition to basic care (standardized antimicrobial therapy, adequate anticoagulation, targeted sedation, early enteral, and parenteral nutrition), it includes early whole-body CT (n = 391; 87.9%), invasive coronary diagnostics (n = 322; 72.4%), targeted temperature management (n = 293; 65.8%), and if indicated, mechanical circulatory support (n = 145; 32.6%), and appropriate neurological diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early goal-directed post-resuscitation management in a well-established and highly frequented CAC leads to significantly higher survival rates. However, our results underline the need for a broader standardization in post-resuscitation management to ultimately improve the outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"707-718"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140862516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marius Roman, Ann Cheng, Florence Y Lai, Hardeep Aujla, Julie Sanders, Jeremy Dearling, Sarah Murray, Mahmoud Loubani, Vijay Kunadian, Chris Gale, Gavin J Murphy
Background: Inequalities in access to care for women, people of non-white ethnicity, who live in areas of social deprivation, and with multiple long-term conditions lead to inequity of outcomes. We investigated the intersectionality of these causes of health inequality on coronary revascularization and clinical outcomes for admissions with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Methods and results: We included hospital admissions in England for types of ACS from April 2015 to April 2018 and linked Hospital Episode Statistics to the Office for National Statistics mortality data. The primary outcome was time to all-cause mortality. Time-to-event analyses examined the associations of sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic deprivation with revascularization. Of 428 700 admissions with ACS, 212 015 (48.8%) received revascularization within 30 days. Women, black ethnicity, multimorbid, and frail patients were less likely to undergo revascularization. South Asian ethnicities had higher [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.17] revascularization rates and comparable risk-adjusted survival but higher re-admission rates when compared to other ethnic groups. Women had higher 1-year all-cause [25.5% vs. 14.7%-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); 24.9% vs. 18.7%-non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)] and cardiovascular (22.6% vs. 13.2%-STEMI; 20.3% vs. 15.6%-NSTEMI) mortality than men. After adjusting for confounders, women had a lower all-cause mortality when compared to men.
Discussion: Outcomes attributed to women and people of South Asian ethnicity may be attributable to age, comorbidity and frailty at presentation. Black ethnicity, geography, and social deprivation may be sources of inequality. These findings highlight the unmet need and may provide potential targets for interventions that address inequalities.
背景:生活在社会贫困地区的妇女、非白种人以及具有多种长期条件的人在获得护理方面的不平等导致了结果的不平等。我们调查了急性冠脉综合征(ACS)入院的冠状动脉血管重建和临床结果的这些健康不平等原因的交叉性。方法:我们纳入了2015年4月至2018年4月期间英国各类急性冠状动脉综合征的住院情况,并将医院发作统计数据与英国国家统计局的死亡率数据联系起来。主要终点是全因死亡率的时间。时间-事件分析研究了性别、种族和社会经济剥夺与血管重建的关系。结果:428700例ACS入院患者中,21215例(48.8%)在30天内接受了血运重建。女性、黑人、多病和体弱患者接受血管重建的可能性较小。南亚族裔的血运重建率(HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.14-1.17)更高,风险调整后的生存率也更高,但与其他族裔相比,再入院率更高。女性1年全因死亡率更高(25.5% vs 14.7%-STEMI;24.9% vs 18.7%-非stemi)和心血管(22.6% vs 13.2%-STEMI;20.3% vs 15.6% (nstemi)的死亡率高于男性。在调整混杂因素后,女性的全因死亡率低于男性。讨论:归因于女性和南亚种族人群的结果可能归因于年龄、合并症和就诊时的虚弱。黑人种族、地理和社会剥夺可能是不平等的根源。这些发现突出了未满足的需求,并可能为解决不平等问题的干预措施提供潜在目标。
{"title":"Intersectionality of inequalities in revascularization and outcomes for acute coronary syndrome in England: nationwide linked cohort study.","authors":"Marius Roman, Ann Cheng, Florence Y Lai, Hardeep Aujla, Julie Sanders, Jeremy Dearling, Sarah Murray, Mahmoud Loubani, Vijay Kunadian, Chris Gale, Gavin J Murphy","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae112","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inequalities in access to care for women, people of non-white ethnicity, who live in areas of social deprivation, and with multiple long-term conditions lead to inequity of outcomes. We investigated the intersectionality of these causes of health inequality on coronary revascularization and clinical outcomes for admissions with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We included hospital admissions in England for types of ACS from April 2015 to April 2018 and linked Hospital Episode Statistics to the Office for National Statistics mortality data. The primary outcome was time to all-cause mortality. Time-to-event analyses examined the associations of sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic deprivation with revascularization. Of 428 700 admissions with ACS, 212 015 (48.8%) received revascularization within 30 days. Women, black ethnicity, multimorbid, and frail patients were less likely to undergo revascularization. South Asian ethnicities had higher [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.17] revascularization rates and comparable risk-adjusted survival but higher re-admission rates when compared to other ethnic groups. Women had higher 1-year all-cause [25.5% vs. 14.7%-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); 24.9% vs. 18.7%-non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)] and cardiovascular (22.6% vs. 13.2%-STEMI; 20.3% vs. 15.6%-NSTEMI) mortality than men. After adjusting for confounders, women had a lower all-cause mortality when compared to men.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Outcomes attributed to women and people of South Asian ethnicity may be attributable to age, comorbidity and frailty at presentation. Black ethnicity, geography, and social deprivation may be sources of inequality. These findings highlight the unmet need and may provide potential targets for interventions that address inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"773-782"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445677/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143064491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Francesco Bruno, Ki Hong Choi, Ovidio De Filippo, Hyun Kuk Kim, Mattia Doronzo, Yun-Kyeong Cho, Tineke H Pinxterhuis, Jeehoon Kang, Alessio Mattesini, Young Bin Song, Raffaele Piccolo, Bon-Kwon Koo, Wojciech Wańha, Hyun-Jong Lee, Bernardo Cortese, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Leor Perl, Hyo-Soo Kim, Domenico Tuttolomondo, Mario Iannaccone, Woo Jung Chun, Davide Capodanno, Attilio Leone, Alessandra Truffa Giachet, Seung-Ho Hur, Giulio Stefanini, Seung Hwan Han, Javier Escaned, Antonino Carmeci, Gianluca Campo, Giuseppe Patti, Clemens von Birgelen, Gaetano Maria de Ferrari, Chang-Wook Nam, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
Background: Bifurcation lesions are associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Aim: To investigate the impact of imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a real-world population with coronary bifurcation lesions.
Methods and results: From the ULTRA-BIFURCAT registry, we compared intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) vs. angiographic guidance in a cohort of 3486 propensity matched patients. MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target-lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis was the primary endpoint. Subgroup analyses were performed for unprotected left main (ULM) and non-ULM disease. PSM generated 1743 pairs. MACE occurred in 154 (9%) patients in the IVUS-guided group and in 199 (11%) patients in the angio-guided group (P = 0.09). IVUS guidance was associated with lower MACE in the ULM population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, 95% confidence internal (CI) 0.46-0.83], but had no impact in the non-ULM population (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.83-1.51), P for interaction = 0.006. IVUS was associated with a reduction in all-MI (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.64) in the ULM population and with lower stent thrombosis (ST) in the non-ULM population (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.71). Provisional stenting was associated with lower MACE in the ULM population (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98), whereas kissing balloon (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-0.99) and ultra-thin stents (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67) were protective factors in the non-ULM population.
Conclusion: In a real-world scenario, IVUS guidance during drug eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with a lower rate of MACE in patients with ULM coronary bifurcation lesions. In non-ULM bifurcations, no difference was observed on MACE, while IVUS guidance was associated with a lower rate of ST.
背景:冠状动脉分叉病变与较高的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)相关:分叉病变与较高的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率有关。目的:在现实世界中冠状动脉分叉病变患者中调查影像引导 PCI 的影响:方法:在 ULTRA-BIFURCAT 登记处,我们对 3486 例倾向匹配患者进行了 IVUS 与血管造影引导的比较。主要终点是全因死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、靶器官血运重建(TLR)和支架血栓形成的复合MACE。对无保护左主干(ULM)和非ULM疾病进行了分组分析:PSM共产生1743对支架。IVUS引导组有154例(9%)患者发生MACE,血管引导组有199例(11%)患者发生MACE(P = 0.09)。在 ULM 患者中,IVUS 引导与较低的 MACE 相关[HR 0.62,95% CI 0.46-0.83],但对非 ULM 患者没有影响[HR 1.12,95% CI 0.83-1.51],交互作用 p = 0.006。在 ULM 患者中,IVUS 与全 MI 减少相关[HR 0.32,95% CI 0.16-0.64],在非 ULM 患者中,IVUS 与 ST 降低相关[HR 0.24,95% CI 0.08-0.71]。在ULM人群中,临时支架与较低的MACE相关[HR 0.67,95% CI 0.45-0.98],而在非ULM人群中,吻合球囊[HR 0.75,95% CI 0.56-0.99]和超薄支架[HR 0.44,95% CI 0.29-0.67]是保护因素:结论:在真实世界中,在IVUS引导下植入DES与降低ULM冠状动脉分叉病变患者的MACE发生率有关。在非ULM分叉病变中,未观察到MACE方面的差异,而IVUS引导与较低的ST率相关。
{"title":"Impact of intravascular ultrasound for coronary bifurcations treated with last-generation stents: insights from the ULTRA-BIFURCAT registry.","authors":"Francesco Bruno, Ki Hong Choi, Ovidio De Filippo, Hyun Kuk Kim, Mattia Doronzo, Yun-Kyeong Cho, Tineke H Pinxterhuis, Jeehoon Kang, Alessio Mattesini, Young Bin Song, Raffaele Piccolo, Bon-Kwon Koo, Wojciech Wańha, Hyun-Jong Lee, Bernardo Cortese, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Leor Perl, Hyo-Soo Kim, Domenico Tuttolomondo, Mario Iannaccone, Woo Jung Chun, Davide Capodanno, Attilio Leone, Alessandra Truffa Giachet, Seung-Ho Hur, Giulio Stefanini, Seung Hwan Han, Javier Escaned, Antonino Carmeci, Gianluca Campo, Giuseppe Patti, Clemens von Birgelen, Gaetano Maria de Ferrari, Chang-Wook Nam, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae091","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bifurcation lesions are associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the impact of imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a real-world population with coronary bifurcation lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>From the ULTRA-BIFURCAT registry, we compared intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) vs. angiographic guidance in a cohort of 3486 propensity matched patients. MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target-lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis was the primary endpoint. Subgroup analyses were performed for unprotected left main (ULM) and non-ULM disease. PSM generated 1743 pairs. MACE occurred in 154 (9%) patients in the IVUS-guided group and in 199 (11%) patients in the angio-guided group (P = 0.09). IVUS guidance was associated with lower MACE in the ULM population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, 95% confidence internal (CI) 0.46-0.83], but had no impact in the non-ULM population (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.83-1.51), P for interaction = 0.006. IVUS was associated with a reduction in all-MI (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.64) in the ULM population and with lower stent thrombosis (ST) in the non-ULM population (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.71). Provisional stenting was associated with lower MACE in the ULM population (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98), whereas kissing balloon (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-0.99) and ultra-thin stents (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67) were protective factors in the non-ULM population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a real-world scenario, IVUS guidance during drug eluting stent (DES) implantation is associated with a lower rate of MACE in patients with ULM coronary bifurcation lesions. In non-ULM bifurcations, no difference was observed on MACE, while IVUS guidance was associated with a lower rate of ST.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"747-755"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142681044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The burden of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) due to low intake of seafood omega-3 fatty acids is a major global health concern, particularly impacting mortality and disability rates. Understanding these trends and demographic variations offers insights for targeted public health interventions.
Methods and results: This study used data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database to analyse the IHD burden attributable to low omega-3 intake across 204 countries from 1990 to 2021, stratified by age, sex, and region. Key metrics included deaths, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years lived with disability, and years of life lost. Joinpoint regression and Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average modelling were used to assess trends and project future burden through 2035. Globally, IHD-related deaths due to low omega-3 intake rose from 500 154 in 1990 to 627 342 in 2021, with the age-standardized death rate declining from 13.94 to 7.49 per 100 000. DALYs increased from 13 million in 1990 to over 15 million in 2021, though the age-standardized DALY rate dropped from 322.93 to 181.07 per 100 000. Regional disparities were significant; North Africa and the Middle East had a 2021 death rate of 18.76 per 100 000 compared with 2.74 per 100 000 in high-income regions. Age and sex stratification revealed that older populations and males bear a higher burden. Projections indicate a stable or rising trend in low sociodemographic index regions through 2035.
Conclusion: This study highlights a substantial global burden of IHD linked to low omega-3 intake, with significant regional and demographic disparities. Increasing omega-3 intake, especially in high-burden regions, could help to mitigate future IHD impacts.
{"title":"Assessing the health impact of low seafood omega-3 intake on ischaemic heart disease: trends, demographic disparities, and forecasts.","authors":"Changxing Liu, Zhirui Zhang","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf006","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The burden of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) due to low intake of seafood omega-3 fatty acids is a major global health concern, particularly impacting mortality and disability rates. Understanding these trends and demographic variations offers insights for targeted public health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This study used data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database to analyse the IHD burden attributable to low omega-3 intake across 204 countries from 1990 to 2021, stratified by age, sex, and region. Key metrics included deaths, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years lived with disability, and years of life lost. Joinpoint regression and Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average modelling were used to assess trends and project future burden through 2035. Globally, IHD-related deaths due to low omega-3 intake rose from 500 154 in 1990 to 627 342 in 2021, with the age-standardized death rate declining from 13.94 to 7.49 per 100 000. DALYs increased from 13 million in 1990 to over 15 million in 2021, though the age-standardized DALY rate dropped from 322.93 to 181.07 per 100 000. Regional disparities were significant; North Africa and the Middle East had a 2021 death rate of 18.76 per 100 000 compared with 2.74 per 100 000 in high-income regions. Age and sex stratification revealed that older populations and males bear a higher burden. Projections indicate a stable or rising trend in low sociodemographic index regions through 2035.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights a substantial global burden of IHD linked to low omega-3 intake, with significant regional and demographic disparities. Increasing omega-3 intake, especially in high-burden regions, could help to mitigate future IHD impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"792-805"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143052050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}