Federico Giacobbe, Arianna Morena, Francesco Bruno, Marco Nebiolo, Ovidio De Filippo, Yasser Odeh, Gianluca Di Pietro, Josep Rodes Cabau, Federico Conrotto, Annapoorna Kini, Giuseppe Giannino, Azeem Latib, Pierluigi Omedé, Stephane Noble, Michele William La Torre, Marco Barbanti, Giuseppe Tarantini, Won-Keun Kim, Johannes Blumenstein, Madjid Boukantar, Wan Wan Htun, Gaetano Maria de Ferrari, Stefano Salizzoni, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
Introduction: The expanding indications for transcatheter aortic valve implatation (TAVI) to younger, lower-risk patients, entails assessing not only the short-term clinical outcomes but also the long-term considerations for future interventions. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in TAVI patients is relevant, and the optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a question.
Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta analysis including 20 eligible studies involving 1660 patients who underwent coronary angiography after TAVI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of successful selective coronary re-access. Secondary endpoints included semi-selective and non-selective access rates. The analysis was stratified by balloon-expandable (BEVs) and self-expandable valve (SEVs) types.
Results: Successful coronary access after TAVI was feasible in the majority of patients, with a higher success rate observed for the left main (LM) compared to the right coronary artery (RCA). BEVs demonstrated the highest success rates in coronary ostia cannulation, achieving nearly 100% success for both LM and RCA. Among SEVs, the Acurate Neo and Evolut R/PRO showed superior success rates in selective coronary access (68% and 77% for LM; 57% and 72% for RCA, respectively) compared to the CoreValve (46% for LM and 49% for RCA). Notably, the majority of coronary angiograms were performed due to acute coronary syndrome, primarily non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA).
Conclusions: Selective coronary engagement after TAVI is generally achievable, with BEVs demonstrating superior success rates compared to SEVs. Among SEVs, the Acurate NEO showed better outcomes than the other types.
{"title":"Feasibility of coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a systematic review and metanalysis of observational studies.","authors":"Federico Giacobbe, Arianna Morena, Francesco Bruno, Marco Nebiolo, Ovidio De Filippo, Yasser Odeh, Gianluca Di Pietro, Josep Rodes Cabau, Federico Conrotto, Annapoorna Kini, Giuseppe Giannino, Azeem Latib, Pierluigi Omedé, Stephane Noble, Michele William La Torre, Marco Barbanti, Giuseppe Tarantini, Won-Keun Kim, Johannes Blumenstein, Madjid Boukantar, Wan Wan Htun, Gaetano Maria de Ferrari, Stefano Salizzoni, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The expanding indications for transcatheter aortic valve implatation (TAVI) to younger, lower-risk patients, entails assessing not only the short-term clinical outcomes but also the long-term considerations for future interventions. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in TAVI patients is relevant, and the optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a question.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review and meta analysis including 20 eligible studies involving 1660 patients who underwent coronary angiography after TAVI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of successful selective coronary re-access. Secondary endpoints included semi-selective and non-selective access rates. The analysis was stratified by balloon-expandable (BEVs) and self-expandable valve (SEVs) types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful coronary access after TAVI was feasible in the majority of patients, with a higher success rate observed for the left main (LM) compared to the right coronary artery (RCA). BEVs demonstrated the highest success rates in coronary ostia cannulation, achieving nearly 100% success for both LM and RCA. Among SEVs, the Acurate Neo and Evolut R/PRO showed superior success rates in selective coronary access (68% and 77% for LM; 57% and 72% for RCA, respectively) compared to the CoreValve (46% for LM and 49% for RCA). Notably, the majority of coronary angiograms were performed due to acute coronary syndrome, primarily non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selective coronary engagement after TAVI is generally achievable, with BEVs demonstrating superior success rates compared to SEVs. Among SEVs, the Acurate NEO showed better outcomes than the other types.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143457349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emmanuel Lansac, Kevin M Veen, Andria Joseph, Paula Blancarte Jaber, Frieda Sossi, Zofia Das-Gupta, Suleman Aktaa, J Rafael Sádaba, Vinod H Thourani, Gry Dahle, Wilson Y Szeto, Faisal Bakaeen, Elena Aikawa, Frederick J Schoen, Evaldas Girdauskas, Aubrey Almeida, Andreas Zuckermann, Bart Meuris, John Stott, Jolanda Kluin, Ruchika Meel, Wil Woan, Daniel Colgan, Hani Jneid, Husam Balkhy, Molly Szerlip, Ourania Preventza, Pinak Shah, Vera H Rigolin, Silvana Medica, Philip Holmes, Marta Sitges, Philippe Pibarot, Erwan Donal, Rebecca T Hahn, Johanna J M Takkenberg
Background: Globally significant variation in treatment and course of heart valve disease (HVD) exists, and outcome measurement is procedure focused instead of patient focused. This article describes the development of a patient-related (International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement) standard set of outcomes and case mix to be measured in patients with HVD.
Methods: A multisociety working group was formed that included patient representatives and representatives from scientific cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery societies that publish current guidelines for HVD. The standard set was developed to monitor the patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment with either a surgical or transcatheter procedure. Candidate clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and case mix were identified through benchmark analyses and systematic reviews. Using an online modified Delphi process, the working group voted on final outcomes/case mix and corresponding definition.
Results: Patients with aortic/mitral/tricuspid valve disease or root/ascending aorta >40 mm were included in the standard set. Patients entered the dataset when the diagnosis of HVD was established, allowing outcome measurement in the preprocedural, periprocedural, and postprocedural phases of patients' lives. The working group defined 5 outcome domains: vital status, patient-reported outcomes, progression of disease, cardiac function and durability, and complications of treatment. Subsequently, 16 outcome measures, including 2 patient-reported outcomes, were selected to be tracked in patients with HVD. Case-mix variables included demographic factors, demographic variables, echocardiographic variables, heart catheterization variables, and specific details on aortic/mitral/tricuspid valves and their specific interventions.
Conclusions: Through a unique collaborative effort between patients and cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery societies, a standard set of measures for HVD was developed. This dataset focuses on outcome measurement regardless of treatment, moving from procedure- to patient-centered outcomes. Implementation of this dataset will facilitate global standardization of outcome measurement, allow meaningful comparison between health care systems and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines, and eventually improve patient care for those experiencing HVD worldwide.
{"title":"The first International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) standard dataset for reporting outcomes in heart valve disease: moving from device- to patient- centered outcomes.","authors":"Emmanuel Lansac, Kevin M Veen, Andria Joseph, Paula Blancarte Jaber, Frieda Sossi, Zofia Das-Gupta, Suleman Aktaa, J Rafael Sádaba, Vinod H Thourani, Gry Dahle, Wilson Y Szeto, Faisal Bakaeen, Elena Aikawa, Frederick J Schoen, Evaldas Girdauskas, Aubrey Almeida, Andreas Zuckermann, Bart Meuris, John Stott, Jolanda Kluin, Ruchika Meel, Wil Woan, Daniel Colgan, Hani Jneid, Husam Balkhy, Molly Szerlip, Ourania Preventza, Pinak Shah, Vera H Rigolin, Silvana Medica, Philip Holmes, Marta Sitges, Philippe Pibarot, Erwan Donal, Rebecca T Hahn, Johanna J M Takkenberg","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally significant variation in treatment and course of heart valve disease (HVD) exists, and outcome measurement is procedure focused instead of patient focused. This article describes the development of a patient-related (International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement) standard set of outcomes and case mix to be measured in patients with HVD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multisociety working group was formed that included patient representatives and representatives from scientific cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery societies that publish current guidelines for HVD. The standard set was developed to monitor the patient's journey from diagnosis to treatment with either a surgical or transcatheter procedure. Candidate clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and case mix were identified through benchmark analyses and systematic reviews. Using an online modified Delphi process, the working group voted on final outcomes/case mix and corresponding definition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with aortic/mitral/tricuspid valve disease or root/ascending aorta >40 mm were included in the standard set. Patients entered the dataset when the diagnosis of HVD was established, allowing outcome measurement in the preprocedural, periprocedural, and postprocedural phases of patients' lives. The working group defined 5 outcome domains: vital status, patient-reported outcomes, progression of disease, cardiac function and durability, and complications of treatment. Subsequently, 16 outcome measures, including 2 patient-reported outcomes, were selected to be tracked in patients with HVD. Case-mix variables included demographic factors, demographic variables, echocardiographic variables, heart catheterization variables, and specific details on aortic/mitral/tricuspid valves and their specific interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through a unique collaborative effort between patients and cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery societies, a standard set of measures for HVD was developed. This dataset focuses on outcome measurement regardless of treatment, moving from procedure- to patient-centered outcomes. Implementation of this dataset will facilitate global standardization of outcome measurement, allow meaningful comparison between health care systems and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines, and eventually improve patient care for those experiencing HVD worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143432760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maria Lachonius, Susanne J Nielsen, Kok Wai Giang, Jenny Backes, Henrik Bjursten, Henrik Hagström, Stefan James, Magnus Settergren, Kristofer Skoglund, Anders Jeppsson, Pétur Pétursson
Introduction: Data are lacking about the risk for death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), compared to the general population. Therefore, we assessed the risk for all-cause death and MACE after TAVI in patients aged 65 years and older, in comparison to an age- and sex-matched control population.
Methods: In total, 5 924 TAVI patients and 10 928 matched controls (mean age 82.1, SD 6.0, and 81.9, SD 6.1, respectively) were included from 2014 to 2020. The SWEDEHEART registry and four mandatory national registers were used to collect data. Cox regression models were used to assess the association with all-cause mortality and MACE risk.
Results: In total, 1 410 (23.8%) of the TAVI patients and 2 115 (19.4%) controls died during the follow-up period. Median follow-up was 1.9 years (IQR 0.9-3.3) respectively. The crude mortality and MACE risks were higher in TAVI patients than in controls (hazard ratios (HR) 1.27 [95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.19-1.36] and HR 1.44 [95% CI: 1.35-1.53], respectively). After adjustment, there was a lower risk for both mortality and MACE in TAVI patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.77 [95% CI: 0.71-0.84] and aHR 0.90 [95% CI: 0.83-0.98], respectively).
Conclusion: After adjustments for comorbidities, the mortality risk was lower in TAVI patients, compared with an age- and sex-matched control population. These findings suggest that the high burden of comorbidities in TAVI patients has a strong impact on the risk for mortality and MACE after TAVI.
{"title":"Mortality and morbidity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to an age- and sex-matched control population: a population-based study from the SWEDEHEART registry.","authors":"Maria Lachonius, Susanne J Nielsen, Kok Wai Giang, Jenny Backes, Henrik Bjursten, Henrik Hagström, Stefan James, Magnus Settergren, Kristofer Skoglund, Anders Jeppsson, Pétur Pétursson","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data are lacking about the risk for death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), compared to the general population. Therefore, we assessed the risk for all-cause death and MACE after TAVI in patients aged 65 years and older, in comparison to an age- and sex-matched control population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 5 924 TAVI patients and 10 928 matched controls (mean age 82.1, SD 6.0, and 81.9, SD 6.1, respectively) were included from 2014 to 2020. The SWEDEHEART registry and four mandatory national registers were used to collect data. Cox regression models were used to assess the association with all-cause mortality and MACE risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1 410 (23.8%) of the TAVI patients and 2 115 (19.4%) controls died during the follow-up period. Median follow-up was 1.9 years (IQR 0.9-3.3) respectively. The crude mortality and MACE risks were higher in TAVI patients than in controls (hazard ratios (HR) 1.27 [95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.19-1.36] and HR 1.44 [95% CI: 1.35-1.53], respectively). After adjustment, there was a lower risk for both mortality and MACE in TAVI patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.77 [95% CI: 0.71-0.84] and aHR 0.90 [95% CI: 0.83-0.98], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After adjustments for comorbidities, the mortality risk was lower in TAVI patients, compared with an age- and sex-matched control population. These findings suggest that the high burden of comorbidities in TAVI patients has a strong impact on the risk for mortality and MACE after TAVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143381949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Helene Ø Vistisen, Peter L Graversen, Eva Havers-Borgersen, Jarl E Strange, Lauge Østergaard, Jawad H Butt, Jordi S Dahl, Jonas A Povlsen, Christian Juhl Terkelsen, Phillip Freeman, Henrik Nissen, Lars Køber, Ole de Backer, Emil L Fosbøl
Background: Antithrombotic therapy post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been widely debated in the past two decades. Data describing practice patterns of antithrombotic therapy are warranted. This study examined the trends in use of antithrombotic therapy post-TAVI in Denmark.
Methods: Danish patients with aortic stenosis who underwent first-time TAVI from 2008 to 2021 were identified from Danish registries. Patients were categorized according to atrial fibrillation (AF) status and antithrombotic therapy post-TAVI based on prescription fillings. The antithrombotic therapy groups: No antithrombotic therapy, single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC), and oral anticoagulant therapy with antiplatelet therapy (OAC+). Use of antithrombotic therapy among survivors at 15 months was examined to assess persistence and possible changes in treatment.
Results: This study included 6447 patients undergoing TAVI. Among patients without AF (n = 3975), most patients received SAPT or DAPT. In AF-patients (n = 2472), most patients received OAC or OAC + . During the first 14 years of TAVI, there was a shift in the antithrombotic treatment pattern: For patients without AF, SAPT increased from 15.6% to 69.5% with a concomitant decrease in DAPT from 56.3% to 9.1%. For AF-patients OAC increased from 13.0% to 77.9% and OAC + decreased to 9.1%. Most patients without AF either remained with or shifted to SAPT. AF-patients either remained in or shifted to the OAC group.
Conclusion: Antithrombotic therapy patterns post-TAVI has changed over the first 14 years of TAVI in Denmark. Use of DAPT and OAC + decreased with a concomitant increase in SAPT and OAC.
{"title":"Antithrombotic therapy following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a Danish nationwide study.","authors":"Helene Ø Vistisen, Peter L Graversen, Eva Havers-Borgersen, Jarl E Strange, Lauge Østergaard, Jawad H Butt, Jordi S Dahl, Jonas A Povlsen, Christian Juhl Terkelsen, Phillip Freeman, Henrik Nissen, Lars Køber, Ole de Backer, Emil L Fosbøl","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antithrombotic therapy post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been widely debated in the past two decades. Data describing practice patterns of antithrombotic therapy are warranted. This study examined the trends in use of antithrombotic therapy post-TAVI in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Danish patients with aortic stenosis who underwent first-time TAVI from 2008 to 2021 were identified from Danish registries. Patients were categorized according to atrial fibrillation (AF) status and antithrombotic therapy post-TAVI based on prescription fillings. The antithrombotic therapy groups: No antithrombotic therapy, single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC), and oral anticoagulant therapy with antiplatelet therapy (OAC+). Use of antithrombotic therapy among survivors at 15 months was examined to assess persistence and possible changes in treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 6447 patients undergoing TAVI. Among patients without AF (n = 3975), most patients received SAPT or DAPT. In AF-patients (n = 2472), most patients received OAC or OAC + . During the first 14 years of TAVI, there was a shift in the antithrombotic treatment pattern: For patients without AF, SAPT increased from 15.6% to 69.5% with a concomitant decrease in DAPT from 56.3% to 9.1%. For AF-patients OAC increased from 13.0% to 77.9% and OAC + decreased to 9.1%. Most patients without AF either remained with or shifted to SAPT. AF-patients either remained in or shifted to the OAC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antithrombotic therapy patterns post-TAVI has changed over the first 14 years of TAVI in Denmark. Use of DAPT and OAC + decreased with a concomitant increase in SAPT and OAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143074147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marius Roman, Ann Cheng, Florence Y Lai, Hardeep Aujla, Julie Sanders, Jeremy Dearling, Sarah Murray, Mahmoud Loubani, Vijay Kunadian, Chris Gale, Gavin J Murphy
Background: Inequalities in access to care for women, people of non-white ethnicity, who live in areas of social deprivation, and with multiple long-term conditions lead to inequity of outcomes. We investigated the intersectionality of these causes of health inequality on coronary revascularisation and clinical outcomes for admissions with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Methods: We included hospital admissions in England for types of acute coronary syndrome from April 2015 to April 2018 and linked Hospital Episode Statistics to the Office for National Statistics mortality data. The primary outcome was time to all-cause mortality. Time-to-event analyses examined the associations of sex, ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation with revascularisation.
Results: Of 428 700 admissions with ACS, 212 015 (48.8%) received revascularisation within 30 days. Women, black ethnicity, multimorbid and frail patients were less likely to undergo revascularisation. South Asian ethnicities had higher (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.14-1.17) revascularisation rates and comparable risk-adjusted survival but higher re-admission rates when compared to other ethnic groups. Women had higher 1-year all-cause (25.5% vs 14.7%-STEMI; 24.9% vs 18.7%-NSTEMI) and cardiovascular (22.6% vs 13.2%-STEMI; 20.3% vs 15.6%-NSTEMI) mortality than men. After adjusting for confounders, women had a lower all-cause mortality when compared to men.
Discussion: Outcomes attributed to women and people of South Asian ethnicity may be attributable to age, comorbidity and frailty at presentation. Black ethnicity, geography and social deprivation may be sources of inequality. These findings highlight the unmet need and may provide potential targets for interventions that address inequalities.
{"title":"Intersectionality of inequalities in revascularisation and outcomes for acute coronary syndrome in England: nationwide linked cohort study.","authors":"Marius Roman, Ann Cheng, Florence Y Lai, Hardeep Aujla, Julie Sanders, Jeremy Dearling, Sarah Murray, Mahmoud Loubani, Vijay Kunadian, Chris Gale, Gavin J Murphy","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inequalities in access to care for women, people of non-white ethnicity, who live in areas of social deprivation, and with multiple long-term conditions lead to inequity of outcomes. We investigated the intersectionality of these causes of health inequality on coronary revascularisation and clinical outcomes for admissions with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included hospital admissions in England for types of acute coronary syndrome from April 2015 to April 2018 and linked Hospital Episode Statistics to the Office for National Statistics mortality data. The primary outcome was time to all-cause mortality. Time-to-event analyses examined the associations of sex, ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation with revascularisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 428 700 admissions with ACS, 212 015 (48.8%) received revascularisation within 30 days. Women, black ethnicity, multimorbid and frail patients were less likely to undergo revascularisation. South Asian ethnicities had higher (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.14-1.17) revascularisation rates and comparable risk-adjusted survival but higher re-admission rates when compared to other ethnic groups. Women had higher 1-year all-cause (25.5% vs 14.7%-STEMI; 24.9% vs 18.7%-NSTEMI) and cardiovascular (22.6% vs 13.2%-STEMI; 20.3% vs 15.6%-NSTEMI) mortality than men. After adjusting for confounders, women had a lower all-cause mortality when compared to men.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Outcomes attributed to women and people of South Asian ethnicity may be attributable to age, comorbidity and frailty at presentation. Black ethnicity, geography and social deprivation may be sources of inequality. These findings highlight the unmet need and may provide potential targets for interventions that address inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143064491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The burden of ischemic heart disease (IHD) due to low intake of seafood omega-3 fatty acids is a major global health concern, particularly impacting mortality and disability rates. Understanding these trends and demographic variations offers insights for targeted public health interventions.
Methods: This study used data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database to analyze the IHD burden attributable to low omega-3 intake across 204 countries from 1990 to 2021, stratified by age, sex, and region. Key metrics included deaths, DALYs, YLDs, and YLLs. Joinpoint regression and ARIMA modeling were used to assess trends and project future burden through 2035.
Results: Globally, IHD-related deaths due to low omega-3 intake rose from 500,154 in 1990 to 627,342 in 2021, with the age-standardized death rate declining from 13.94 to 7.49 per 100,000. DALYs increased from 13 million in 1990 to over 15 million in 2021, though the age-standardized DALY rate dropped from 322.93 to 181.07 per 100,000. Regional disparities were significant; North Africa and the Middle East had a 2021 death rate of 18.76 per 100,000, compared to 2.74 per 100,000 in high-income regions. Age and sex stratification revealed that older populations and males bear a higher burden. Projections indicate a stable or rising trend in low-SDI regions through 2035.
Conclusion: This study highlights a substantial global burden of IHD linked to low omega-3 intake, with significant regional and demographic disparities. Increasing omega-3 intake, especially in high-burden regions, could help to mitigate future IHD impacts.
{"title":"Assessing the Health Impact of Low Seafood Omega-3 Intake on Ischemic Heart Disease: Trends, Demographic Disparities, and Forecasts.","authors":"Changxing Liu, Zhirui Zhang","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The burden of ischemic heart disease (IHD) due to low intake of seafood omega-3 fatty acids is a major global health concern, particularly impacting mortality and disability rates. Understanding these trends and demographic variations offers insights for targeted public health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database to analyze the IHD burden attributable to low omega-3 intake across 204 countries from 1990 to 2021, stratified by age, sex, and region. Key metrics included deaths, DALYs, YLDs, and YLLs. Joinpoint regression and ARIMA modeling were used to assess trends and project future burden through 2035.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Globally, IHD-related deaths due to low omega-3 intake rose from 500,154 in 1990 to 627,342 in 2021, with the age-standardized death rate declining from 13.94 to 7.49 per 100,000. DALYs increased from 13 million in 1990 to over 15 million in 2021, though the age-standardized DALY rate dropped from 322.93 to 181.07 per 100,000. Regional disparities were significant; North Africa and the Middle East had a 2021 death rate of 18.76 per 100,000, compared to 2.74 per 100,000 in high-income regions. Age and sex stratification revealed that older populations and males bear a higher burden. Projections indicate a stable or rising trend in low-SDI regions through 2035.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights a substantial global burden of IHD linked to low omega-3 intake, with significant regional and demographic disparities. Increasing omega-3 intake, especially in high-burden regions, could help to mitigate future IHD impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143052050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jo-Nan Liao, Yi-Hsin Chan, Ling Kuo, Chuan-Tsai Tsai, Chih-Min Liu, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Gregory Y H Lip, Shih-Ann Chen, Tze-Fan Chao
Objective: To analyze the temporal trends of oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose, clinical outcomes and factors associated with non-anticoagulation in patients with incident atrial fibrillation (AF).
Patients and methods: During January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, a total of 249,107 patients with newly diagnosed AF were identified, and the 1-year risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and all-cause mortality were analyzed.
Results: OAC prescription increased from 22.1% in 2011 to 57.7% in 2020 with DOAC accounting for 91.0% of overall OAC prescriptions. Compared to patients with incident AF diagnosed in 2011, there were increasing trends for a greater decrease in the risks of ischemic stroke during 2012 - 2020 and mortality during 2014 - 2020, while the risk of ICH did not change significantly. For DOAC users, higher dose use increased from 11.04% in 2012 to 44.29% in 2019-2020 temporally associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke in the years 2015-2017 and 2018-2020 compared to 2012-2014. Determining factors refraining from OAC use included some "patient-related factors" and "non-patient" factors (AF diagnosed at clinics by physicians other than cardiologist/neurologist/internal medicine and citizens outside municipalities).
Conclusion: There was an increasing trend of OAC prescription, temporally associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke and mortality. Among DOACs users, the risk of ischemic stroke declined gradually, partly explained by the increasing prescriptions of higher dose DOACs. Both patient and non-patient factors were associated with non-anticoagulation. Further efforts are required to increase OAC prescription.
{"title":"Temporal trends of prescription rates, oral anticoagulants dose, clinical outcomes and factors associated with non-anticoagulation in patients with incident atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Jo-Nan Liao, Yi-Hsin Chan, Ling Kuo, Chuan-Tsai Tsai, Chih-Min Liu, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Gregory Y H Lip, Shih-Ann Chen, Tze-Fan Chao","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the temporal trends of oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose, clinical outcomes and factors associated with non-anticoagulation in patients with incident atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>During January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, a total of 249,107 patients with newly diagnosed AF were identified, and the 1-year risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and all-cause mortality were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OAC prescription increased from 22.1% in 2011 to 57.7% in 2020 with DOAC accounting for 91.0% of overall OAC prescriptions. Compared to patients with incident AF diagnosed in 2011, there were increasing trends for a greater decrease in the risks of ischemic stroke during 2012 - 2020 and mortality during 2014 - 2020, while the risk of ICH did not change significantly. For DOAC users, higher dose use increased from 11.04% in 2012 to 44.29% in 2019-2020 temporally associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke in the years 2015-2017 and 2018-2020 compared to 2012-2014. Determining factors refraining from OAC use included some \"patient-related factors\" and \"non-patient\" factors (AF diagnosed at clinics by physicians other than cardiologist/neurologist/internal medicine and citizens outside municipalities).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an increasing trend of OAC prescription, temporally associated with a decreased risk of ischemic stroke and mortality. Among DOACs users, the risk of ischemic stroke declined gradually, partly explained by the increasing prescriptions of higher dose DOACs. Both patient and non-patient factors were associated with non-anticoagulation. Further efforts are required to increase OAC prescription.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143022551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel A Gomes, Sanjali A C Ahuja, Yi Ting Yu, Robert English, Mahmood Ahmad, Mohammed Khanji, Pedro Adragão, Rui Providência
Introduction: The ESC and ACC/AHA regularly publish guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease. By definition, a guideline should follow strict methodological criteria, and have a transparent, traceable and reproducible development process. We aimed to assess the overall strength of the recommendations and rigour of methodological development in ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines.
Methods: A systematic review of the ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines published from 2013 to 2024 was conducted. Documents Class of Recommendation (COR) and Level of Evidence (LOE) of recommendations were included. For each document, data regarding citation count (ISI and Scholar), and COR and LOE of the recommendations were extracted. Guidelines were assessed for rigour of methodological development using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.
Results: Among the 76 included guidelines, the average citation-per-year was 344 (ISI) and 681 (Scholar). Forty-nine % of the recommendations were classified as COR I (strong recommendations), while 46% were based solely on expert opinion (LOE C). The overall AGREE II methodology domain score was 29 ± 6 (range 7-56), with lowest performance for the domains of systematic search of evidence, use of predefined criteria for selecting the evidence and external review. Both the strength of the recommendations and rigour of development showed a stable trend over the past 12 years. The ACC/AHA guidelines followed more rigorous development methods compared to ESC (AGREE II 36±3 vs. 24 ± 3).
Conclusions: Clinical guidelines from the main European and American cardiovascular societies are highly cited but show significant limitations in methodological rigour.
简介:ESC和ACC/AHA定期发布心血管疾病管理指南。根据定义,指南应该遵循严格的方法标准,并具有透明、可跟踪和可重复的开发过程。我们的目的是评估ESC和ACC/AHA指南中建议的总体强度和方法发展的严谨性。方法:对2013 - 2024年发表的ESC和ACC/AHA指南进行系统回顾。包括建议的文献推荐等级(COR)和证据水平(LOE)。对于每篇文献,提取了有关被引数(ISI和Scholar)以及推荐的COR和LOE的数据。使用研究与评估指南评估II (AGREE II)工具评估指南方法开发的严谨性。结果:在纳入的76份指南中,ISI的平均年引用量为344次,Scholar的平均年引用量为681次。49%的建议被归类为COR I(强烈建议),而46%的建议仅基于专家意见(LOE C)。总体AGREE II方法领域得分为29±6(范围7-56),在系统搜索证据、使用预定义标准选择证据和外部审查领域表现最差。在过去12年中,建议的力度和发展的严谨性都显示出稳定的趋势。与ESC相比,ACC/AHA指南遵循更严格的开发方法(AGREE II 36±3 vs 24±3)。结论:来自主要欧洲和美国心血管学会的临床指南被高度引用,但在方法学严谨性方面存在显着局限性。
{"title":"Rigour of Development of European Society of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines over a 12-year period (2013-2024): a systematic review of guidelines.","authors":"Daniel A Gomes, Sanjali A C Ahuja, Yi Ting Yu, Robert English, Mahmood Ahmad, Mohammed Khanji, Pedro Adragão, Rui Providência","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae113","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ESC and ACC/AHA regularly publish guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease. By definition, a guideline should follow strict methodological criteria, and have a transparent, traceable and reproducible development process. We aimed to assess the overall strength of the recommendations and rigour of methodological development in ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines published from 2013 to 2024 was conducted. Documents Class of Recommendation (COR) and Level of Evidence (LOE) of recommendations were included. For each document, data regarding citation count (ISI and Scholar), and COR and LOE of the recommendations were extracted. Guidelines were assessed for rigour of methodological development using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 76 included guidelines, the average citation-per-year was 344 (ISI) and 681 (Scholar). Forty-nine % of the recommendations were classified as COR I (strong recommendations), while 46% were based solely on expert opinion (LOE C). The overall AGREE II methodology domain score was 29 ± 6 (range 7-56), with lowest performance for the domains of systematic search of evidence, use of predefined criteria for selecting the evidence and external review. Both the strength of the recommendations and rigour of development showed a stable trend over the past 12 years. The ACC/AHA guidelines followed more rigorous development methods compared to ESC (AGREE II 36±3 vs. 24 ± 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical guidelines from the main European and American cardiovascular societies are highly cited but show significant limitations in methodological rigour.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arunkumar Krishnan, Omar T Sims, Daniel Teran, Tinsay A Woreta, William R Hutson, Saleh A Alqahtani
Aims: Bariatric surgery (BS) is a potential treatment option for patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and obesity. These patients are also at substantial risk of developing cardiovascular events and associated mortality. We aimed to assess if BS could reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality and improve long-term survival.
Methods and results: Using the TriNetX data, adult patients (>18 years) with the diagnosis of MASLD, obesity (i.e. body mass index [BMI] ≥35 kg/m2), and pre-existing coronary artery disease (CAD) between January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2022, were included. Patients with a BS were compared to those with no history of BS. Primary outcomes were the incidence of MACE, heart failure, cerebrovascular events, and coronary artery procedures or surgeries at years 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality at years 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), sensitivity analysis, and survival analysis. After PSM, both groups had a total of 1038 patients. At year 1, BS patients had a significantly lower incidence of MACE (HR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.39-0.80), cerebrovascular disease (HR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.46-0.82), and coronary artery procedures and surgeries (HR = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.42-0.98). Similarly, at 3, 5, 7, and 10, BS patients had a significantly lower incidence of MACE, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and coronary artery procedures and surgeries. BS patients had significantly lower 3, 5, 7, 10-year all-cause mortality. Sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings.
Conclusions: BS in patients with MASLD, obesity, and pre-existing CAD can considerably reduce the risk of recurring cardiovascular events and markedly improve survival immediately within the first year of BS and can persist long-term, even a decade after BS.
{"title":"Bariatric Surgery and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Obesity, Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, and Coronary Artery Disease: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Arunkumar Krishnan, Omar T Sims, Daniel Teran, Tinsay A Woreta, William R Hutson, Saleh A Alqahtani","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Bariatric surgery (BS) is a potential treatment option for patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and obesity. These patients are also at substantial risk of developing cardiovascular events and associated mortality. We aimed to assess if BS could reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality and improve long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Using the TriNetX data, adult patients (>18 years) with the diagnosis of MASLD, obesity (i.e. body mass index [BMI] ≥35 kg/m2), and pre-existing coronary artery disease (CAD) between January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2022, were included. Patients with a BS were compared to those with no history of BS. Primary outcomes were the incidence of MACE, heart failure, cerebrovascular events, and coronary artery procedures or surgeries at years 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality at years 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), sensitivity analysis, and survival analysis. After PSM, both groups had a total of 1038 patients. At year 1, BS patients had a significantly lower incidence of MACE (HR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.39-0.80), cerebrovascular disease (HR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.46-0.82), and coronary artery procedures and surgeries (HR = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.42-0.98). Similarly, at 3, 5, 7, and 10, BS patients had a significantly lower incidence of MACE, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and coronary artery procedures and surgeries. BS patients had significantly lower 3, 5, 7, 10-year all-cause mortality. Sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BS in patients with MASLD, obesity, and pre-existing CAD can considerably reduce the risk of recurring cardiovascular events and markedly improve survival immediately within the first year of BS and can persist long-term, even a decade after BS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aims: This study aims to explore the efficacy of reperfusion strategies on the clinical outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients over 80 years old in China.
Methods and results: A retrospective cohort study was performed on STEMI patients over 80 years old who underwent reperfusion strategies and no reperfusion between January 2014 and December 2021, based on the Chinese Cardiovascular Association (CCA) Database-Chest Pain Center. This study included a total of 42,699 patients (mean age 84.1 ± 3.6 years, 52.2% male), among whom 19,280 (45.2%) underwent no reperfusion, 20,924 (49.0%) underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 2495 (5.8%) underwent thrombolytic therapy. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that patients who underwent primary PCI strategy showed a significantly lower risk of in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.67, P < 0.001] and the composite outcome (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.79-0.87, P < 0.001) compared to those who received no reperfusion. In contrast, patients with thrombolytic therapy exhibited a non-significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.86-1.14, P = 0.890) and a significantly elevated risk of the composite outcome (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.27, P = 0.004). During a median follow-up of 6.7 months post-hospital admission, there was a percentage 31.4% of patients died, and patients in the primary PCI group consistently demonstrated a reduced incidence of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.56-0.61, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: STEMI patients over 80 years old who underwent the primary PCI strategy are more likely to have favourable clinical outcomes compared to those who received no reperfusion, whereas thrombolytic therapy warrants careful assessment and monitoring.
{"title":"Reperfusion strategies on the clinical outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients over 80 years old in China.","authors":"Xinkai Qu, Shaofeng Guan, Jiasheng Cai, Qian Gan, Wenzheng Han, Liming Lu, Weiyi Fang, Peng Yin, Hong Shi, Annai Wang, Yuanchao Gao, Maigeng Zhou, Yong Huo","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae013","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to explore the efficacy of reperfusion strategies on the clinical outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients over 80 years old in China.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed on STEMI patients over 80 years old who underwent reperfusion strategies and no reperfusion between January 2014 and December 2021, based on the Chinese Cardiovascular Association (CCA) Database-Chest Pain Center. This study included a total of 42,699 patients (mean age 84.1 ± 3.6 years, 52.2% male), among whom 19,280 (45.2%) underwent no reperfusion, 20,924 (49.0%) underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 2495 (5.8%) underwent thrombolytic therapy. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that patients who underwent primary PCI strategy showed a significantly lower risk of in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.67, P < 0.001] and the composite outcome (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.79-0.87, P < 0.001) compared to those who received no reperfusion. In contrast, patients with thrombolytic therapy exhibited a non-significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.86-1.14, P = 0.890) and a significantly elevated risk of the composite outcome (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.27, P = 0.004). During a median follow-up of 6.7 months post-hospital admission, there was a percentage 31.4% of patients died, and patients in the primary PCI group consistently demonstrated a reduced incidence of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.56-0.61, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STEMI patients over 80 years old who underwent the primary PCI strategy are more likely to have favourable clinical outcomes compared to those who received no reperfusion, whereas thrombolytic therapy warrants careful assessment and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139711709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}