European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes最新文献

Aims: To develop a suite of quality indicators (QIs) for the evaluation of the care and outcomes for adults undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Methods and results: We followed the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) methodology for the development of QIs. Key domains were identified by constructing a conceptual framework for the delivery of TAVI care. A list of candidate QIs was developed by conducting a systematic review of the literature. A modified Delphi method was then used to select the final set of QIs. Finally, we mapped the QIs to the EuroHeart (European Unified Registries on Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials) data standards for TAVI to ascertain the extent to which the EuroHeart TAVI registry captures information to calculate the QIs. We formed an international group of experts in quality improvement and TAVI, including representatives from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, and the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions. In total, 27 QIs were selected across 8 domains of TAVI care, comprising 22 main (81%) and 5 secondary (19%) QIs. Of these, 19/27 (70%) are now being utilized in the EuroHeart TAVI registry.

Conclusion: We present the 2023 ESC QIs for TAVI, developed using a standard methodology and in collaboration with ESC Associations. The EuroHeart TAVI registry allows calculation of the majority of the QIs, which may be used for benchmarking care and quality improvement initiatives.

Aims: Diabetes mellitus (diabetes) is common amongst patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We describe presentation, care, and outcomes of patients admitted with NSTEMI by diabetes status.

Methods and results: Prospective cohort study including 2928 patients (1104 with prior diabetes, 1824 without) admitted to hospital with NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries. Quality of care was evaluated based on 12 guideline-recommended care interventions. Outcomes included in-hospital acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, repeat myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA), BARC Type ≥ 3 bleeding and death, as well as 30-day mortality. Patients with diabetes had higher comorbidity burden and more frequently presented with Killip Class II-IV heart failure (10.2% vs. 3.7%, P < 0.001), haemodynamic instability (7.1% vs. 3.7%, P < 0.001), and ongoing chest pain (43.1% vs. 37.0%, P < 0.001), than those without diabetes. Overall, care quality received was similar by diabetes status (60.0% vs. 60.5% received ≥ 80% of eligible care interventions, P = 0.786), but patients with diabetes experienced higher rates of in-hospital acute heart failure (15.3% vs. 6.8% P < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (4.5% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.002), stroke/TIA (2.0% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.006), and death (2.5% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.022), and higher 30-day mortality (3.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.025). Of NSTEMI with diabetes, only 1.9% and 9.0% received prescription for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, respectively, on discharge, and only 45.9% were referred for cardiac rehabilitation.

Conclusion: NSTEMI patients with diabetes, compared with those without, present more clinically unwell and have worse outcomes despite receiving equal quality of care. Prescription of cardiovascular-protective glycaemic agents is an actionable target to reduce risk of further events.

Aims: Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) has recently been approved for clinical use in the European Society of Hypertension guidelines and by the US Food and Drug Administration. This study evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of RF RDN using contemporary evidence.

Methods and results: A decision-analytic model based on multivariate risk equations projected clinical events, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs. The model consisted of seven health states: hypertension alone, myocardial infarction (MI), other symptomatic coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease, and death. Risk reduction associated with changes in office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) was estimated based on a published meta-regression of hypertension trials. The base case effect size of -4.9 mmHg oSBP (observed vs. sham control) was taken from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial of 337 patients. Costs were based on National Health Service England data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000-30 000 per QALY gained. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted, including the ON-MED subgroup on three medications and pooled effect sizes. RF RDN resulted in a relative risk reduction in clinical events over 10 years (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, 0.72 for HF), with an increase in health benefit over a patient's lifetime, adding 0.35 QALYs at a cost of £4763, giving an ICER of £13 482 per QALY gained. Findings were robust across tested scenarios.

Conclusion: Catheter-based radiofrequency RDN can be a cost-effective strategy for uncontrolled hypertension in the UK, with an ICER substantially below the NICE cost-effectiveness threshold.

Aims: The relationship between the level of baseline risk factor control and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure interventions is not well understood. It is also unclear whether the level of baseline risk factor control is persuasively associated with cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with a blood pressure lowering strategy.

Method and results: We performed an analysis of the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial. Participants without complete baseline risk factor data were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and estimate the association between risk factor control levels (≥6, 5, 4, and ≤3) and cardiovascular outcomes. A total of 8337 participants were involved in the analysis, and the median follow-up period was 3.19 years. Each additional risk factor uncontrolled was associated with a 24% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.37). Compared with participants with optimal risk factor control, those with ≤3 factors control exhibited 95% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.37-2.77). The corresponding protective effects of multiple risk factor modification were not influenced by intensive or standard antihypertensive treatment (P for interaction = 0.71).

Conclusion: A stepwise association was observed between cardiovascular risk and the number of risk factor control in hypertensive patients. The more risk factors were modified, the less cardiovascular risk was observed, irrespective of different blood pressure lowering strategies. Comprehensive risk factor control strategies are warranted to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients.

Background: Use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved clinical outcomes over angiography alone. Despite this, the adoption of IVUS in clinical practice remains low.

Aims: To examine the cost-effectiveness of IVUS-guided PCI compared to angiography alone in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Methods and results: A 1-year decision tree and lifetime Markov model were constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of IVUS-guided PCI to angiography alone for two hypothetical adult populations consisting of 1000 individuals: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The United Kingdom (UK) healthcare system perspective was applied using 2019/20 costs. All-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat PCI, lifetime costs, life expectancy, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were assessed. Over a lifetime horizon, IVUS-guided PCI was cost-effective compared to angiography alone in both populations, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £3649 and £5706 per-patient in STEMI and UA/NSTEMI patients, respectively.In the 1-year time horizon, the model suggested that IVUS was associated with reductions in mortality, MI, and repeat PCI by 51%, 33%, and 52% in STEMI and by 50%, 29%, and 57% in UA/NSTEMI patients, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the model with IVUS being 100% cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY-gained.

Conclusions: From a UK healthcare perspective, an IVUS-guided PCI strategy was highly cost-effective over angiography alone amongst ACS patients undergoing DES implantation due to the medium- and long-term reduction in repeat PCI, death, and MI.

ESC Guidelines provide best practice, evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating patients with cardiovascular diseases. It is not always possible for best practices to be followed, however, particularly in low-resource settings. To address this issue, a set of guideline-related documents were created to identify key priorities for users in these settings. The documents highlight the related recommendations and describe key strategies for clinicians to approach implementation of these recommendations or discuss alternatives which are in line with the intention of the recommendations, if not having all of the same advantages. The suggestions cannot be used as exact substitutes for the original recommendations in the guidelines, which have not been altered and continue to reflect best practice. This document on key priorities for low-resource settings was developed by the task force Chairs and other members of the task force which produced the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies, which are freely available on the ESC website (https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines). This document also underwent external review including international experts from within and beyond Europe and included non-ESC associations. The non-ESC associations were The Interamerican Society of Cardiology (IASC), The Pan-African Society of Cardiology (PASCAR), The Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology (APSC) and The Asean Federation of Cardiology (AFC).