Pub Date : 2024-09-02DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.357
R Barbosa Silva, A Moreira, B Pimenta, I Pádua
Summary: Background. Current recommendations for infant weaning suggest introducing common food allergens by the age of 12 months. While homemade meals are advisable, there is a notable demand for commercially available complementary foods (CACF). Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests a potential link between the consumption of ultra-processed products and the incidence of allergic diseases. This study aimed to examine the presence of the fourteen main food allergens in CACF ingredients through label analysis and evaluate their extent of processing. Methods. Between January and February 2024, labels of all CACF found in infant feeding sections of 10 Portuguese grocery retailers were analyzed. CACF were categorized based on the NOVA food classification system's processing levels. Milk formulas, products for children over 15 months, and those for children with food allergies or intolerances were excluded Results. Of the 492 products analysed, 132 contained wheat and 112 contained milk. 16 products included fish and 6 contained egg. Soy was listed as an ingredient in 11 products, mainly as soy lecithin. Only 2 product contained nuts, and 1 product contained peanuts. None of the products contained the remaining six allergens. The majority of milk- and wheat-containing products were classified as ultra-processed and contained added sugars and/or sweeteners. Conclusions. Despite the current guidelines, commercial baby foods often lack major allergens, namely nuts and peanuts, eggs, and shellfish. Our results underscore the need for healthy, age-appropriate, minimally processed products that incorporate rather than exclude major food allergens.
{"title":"Allergens weaning: what is missing from commercial baby food?","authors":"R Barbosa Silva, A Moreira, B Pimenta, I Pádua","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.357","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Current recommendations for infant weaning suggest introducing common food allergens by the age of 12 months. While homemade meals are advisable, there is a notable demand for commercially available complementary foods (CACF). Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests a potential link between the consumption of ultra-processed products and the incidence of allergic diseases. This study aimed to examine the presence of the fourteen main food allergens in CACF ingredients through label analysis and evaluate their extent of processing. <b>Methods.</b> Between January and February 2024, labels of all CACF found in infant feeding sections of 10 Portuguese grocery retailers were analyzed. CACF were categorized based on the NOVA food classification system's processing levels. Milk formulas, products for children over 15 months, and those for children with food allergies or intolerances were excluded <b>Results.</b> Of the 492 products analysed, 132 contained wheat and 112 contained milk. 16 products included fish and 6 contained egg. Soy was listed as an ingredient in 11 products, mainly as soy lecithin. Only 2 product contained nuts, and 1 product contained peanuts. None of the products contained the remaining six allergens. The majority of milk- and wheat-containing products were classified as ultra-processed and contained added sugars and/or sweeteners. <b>Conclusions.</b> Despite the current guidelines, commercial baby foods often lack major allergens, namely nuts and peanuts, eggs, and shellfish. Our results underscore the need for healthy, age-appropriate, minimally processed products that incorporate rather than exclude major food allergens.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142105632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-02DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.359
R Moço Coutinho, A M Mesquita, J L Plácido, A Coimbra
Summary: Background. Ultra-rush venom immunotherapy protocols have shown to be a safe and effective approach to prevent the occurrence of systemic reactions after hymenoptera stings. The aim was to describe our experience with two ultra-rush protocols - a five-step with 1 µg starting dose and a six-step with 0.1 µg starting dose, as well as to compare their safety profile. Methods. This is a retrospective study of all the patients who underwent VIT with honey bee or wasp venom between January 2008 and December 2021, in our department. Results. A total of 110 patients was included, with 109 patients (99%) completing the protocol. A total of 63 (57%) patients had no local or systemic reactions. Most systemic reactions occurred with 20 µg or higher doses (24, 83%). There were no documented grade IV systemic reactions (Mueller grading). No differences were found in local or systemic reactions regarding sex, atopy, β-blocker medication, the severity of the index reaction, ID test positivity, levels of total IgE, specific IgE and tryptase (all p > 0.05). Younger age, treatment with bee VIT or being a beekeeper were associated with more systemic reactions (p = 0.035, 0.006 and 0.047, respectively). No statistical differences in the number of local and systemic reactions were found when comparing both protocols (p = 1.000). Conclusions. Ultra-rush protocols are safe and effective, but systemic reactions are to be expected, especially with honeybee. Our data supports that ACE inhibitors do not compromise safety. Beginning with 1 µg is safe and can save time and resources.
{"title":"Venom immunotherapy in clinical practice: comparison of two ultra-rush protocols.","authors":"R Moço Coutinho, A M Mesquita, J L Plácido, A Coimbra","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Ultra-rush venom immunotherapy protocols have shown to be a safe and effective approach to prevent the occurrence of systemic reactions after hymenoptera stings. The aim was to describe our experience with two ultra-rush protocols - a five-step with 1 µg starting dose and a six-step with 0.1 µg starting dose, as well as to compare their safety profile. <b>Methods.</b> This is a retrospective study of all the patients who underwent VIT with honey bee or wasp venom between January 2008 and December 2021, in our department. <b>Results.</b> A total of 110 patients was included, with 109 patients (99%) completing the protocol. A total of 63 (57%) patients had no local or systemic reactions. Most systemic reactions occurred with 20 µg or higher doses (24, 83%). There were no documented grade IV systemic reactions (Mueller grading). No differences were found in local or systemic reactions regarding sex, atopy, β-blocker medication, the severity of the index reaction, ID test positivity, levels of total IgE, specific IgE and tryptase (all p > 0.05). Younger age, treatment with bee VIT or being a beekeeper were associated with more systemic reactions (p = 0.035, 0.006 and 0.047, respectively). No statistical differences in the number of local and systemic reactions were found when comparing both protocols (p = 1.000). <b>Conclusions.</b> Ultra-rush protocols are safe and effective, but systemic reactions are to be expected, especially with honeybee. Our data supports that ACE inhibitors do not compromise safety. Beginning with 1 µg is safe and can save time and resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142105633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2023-03-28DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.293
P Simão Coelho, G Martins Dos Santos, M Mikovic, J Oliveira, S Rosa, E Silva, P Leiria Pinto
Summary: Background. Drug hypersensitivity reactions are presumably immune-mediated reactions that cause reproducible signs and/or symptoms. Overdiagnosis of drug allergy, frequently self-reported, is common and carries significant limitations. We intended to analyze the frequency and impact of drug allergy in hospitalized patients. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted in an Internal Medicine ward at a tertiary hospital in Portugal. All patients with a drug allergy report admitted within a 3-year period were included. Data were collected from their electronic medical records. Results. We found that 15.4% of patients had a report of drug allergy, with antibiotics being the most common (56.4%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (21.7%) and radiocontrast media (7.0%). The allergy report affected the clinical approach of 14.5% of patients by motivating the use of second-line agents, or the eviction of necessary procedures. The usage of alternative antibiotics entailed a cost increase of 2.4 times. There were 14.7% of patients to whom the suspected drug was administered: 87.0% tolerated and 13.0% developed a reaction. Only 1.9% were referred to our Allergy and Clinical Immunology department and proceeded in their allergy study. Conclusions. In this study, a considerable number of patients had a drug allergy label on their records. This label contributed to an increase in the cost of treatment, or the avoidance of necessary exams. However, disregarding an allergy record may lead to potentially life-threatening reactions that proper risk assessment could avoid. Further investigation should always be part of the follow-up routine of these patients, and better articulation between departments should be encouraged.
{"title":"The impact of a drug allergy label in an internal medicine ward.","authors":"P Simão Coelho, G Martins Dos Santos, M Mikovic, J Oliveira, S Rosa, E Silva, P Leiria Pinto","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.293","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Drug hypersensitivity reactions are presumably immune-mediated reactions that cause reproducible signs and/or symptoms. Overdiagnosis of drug allergy, frequently self-reported, is common and carries significant limitations. We intended to analyze the frequency and impact of drug allergy in hospitalized patients. <b>Methods.</b> A retrospective study was conducted in an Internal Medicine ward at a tertiary hospital in Portugal. All patients with a drug allergy report admitted within a 3-year period were included. Data were collected from their electronic medical records. <b>Results.</b> We found that 15.4% of patients had a report of drug allergy, with antibiotics being the most common (56.4%), followed by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (21.7%) and radiocontrast media (7.0%). The allergy report affected the clinical approach of 14.5% of patients by motivating the use of second-line agents, or the eviction of necessary procedures. The usage of alternative antibiotics entailed a cost increase of 2.4 times. There were 14.7% of patients to whom the suspected drug was administered: 87.0% tolerated and 13.0% developed a reaction. Only 1.9% were referred to our Allergy and Clinical Immunology department and proceeded in their allergy study. <b>Conclusions.</b> In this study, a considerable number of patients had a drug allergy label on their records. This label contributed to an increase in the cost of treatment, or the avoidance of necessary exams. However, disregarding an allergy record may lead to potentially life-threatening reactions that proper risk assessment could avoid. Further investigation should always be part of the follow-up routine of these patients, and better articulation between departments should be encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"227-232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9199396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2023-12-06DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.318
S Yeşilkaya, K Aksu, G Tuğçe Vural Solak, O Akkale, O Telli, H C Tuğlu, G Köycü Buhari, S N Bahçecioğlu, S Demir
Summary: Background. Although biologic agents promise a short- to medium-term remission in asthma, it is unclear whether they can fundamentally alter disease course and achieve long-term remission. We aimed to investigate the clinical remission success of biologics in patients with severe asthma and the factors associated with remission. Methods. Adults followed-up due to severe asthma who were treated with mepolizumab or omalizumab were included in the study. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were reviewed. Subjects with and without clinical remission at 12 and 36 months were identified. Comparisons between the groups were made with univariate and multivariable analyses. Results. Seventy-four patients were included in the study. The mean age of subjects was 51.85 (standard deviation: 11.43) years, and 50 (67.57%) were females. The 12- and 36-month remission rates were 72.97% and 51.79%, respectively. Patients with and without remission were similar in terms of age and gender distribution. FEV1% predicted (p = 0.009) and FEV1/FVC ratio (p = 0.039) were significantly higher in those with remission at 12 months compared to those without. FEV1 (p less than 0.001), FEV1% predicted (p less than 0.001) and FEV1/FVC ratio (p = 0.004) were significantly higher in those with remission at 36 months compared to those without. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that higher FEV1% predicted was the only factor independently associated with remission for both time points. Conclusions. Omalizumab and mepolizumab provide significant clinical remission rates in severe asthma. FEV1% predicted is a variable that can independently predict clinical remission among severe asthmatics receiving biologic agents.
{"title":"Variables predicting clinical remission among adults with severe asthma treated with biologic agents.","authors":"S Yeşilkaya, K Aksu, G Tuğçe Vural Solak, O Akkale, O Telli, H C Tuğlu, G Köycü Buhari, S N Bahçecioğlu, S Demir","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.318","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.318","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Although biologic agents promise a short- to medium-term remission in asthma, it is unclear whether they can fundamentally alter disease course and achieve long-term remission. We aimed to investigate the clinical remission success of biologics in patients with severe asthma and the factors associated with remission. <b>Methods.</b> Adults followed-up due to severe asthma who were treated with mepolizumab or omalizumab were included in the study. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were reviewed. Subjects with and without clinical remission at 12 and 36 months were identified. Comparisons between the groups were made with univariate and multivariable analyses. <b>Results.</b> Seventy-four patients were included in the study. The mean age of subjects was 51.85 (standard deviation: 11.43) years, and 50 (67.57%) were females. The 12- and 36-month remission rates were 72.97% and 51.79%, respectively. Patients with and without remission were similar in terms of age and gender distribution. FEV1% predicted (p = 0.009) and FEV1/FVC ratio (p = 0.039) were significantly higher in those with remission at 12 months compared to those without. FEV1 (p less than 0.001), FEV1% predicted (p less than 0.001) and FEV1/FVC ratio (p = 0.004) were significantly higher in those with remission at 36 months compared to those without. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that higher FEV1% predicted was the only factor independently associated with remission for both time points. <b>Conclusions.</b> Omalizumab and mepolizumab provide significant clinical remission rates in severe asthma. FEV1% predicted is a variable that can independently predict clinical remission among severe asthmatics receiving biologic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"219-226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138487067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2022-12-14DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.278
C Varandas, L Esteves Caldeira, S L Silva, C Costa, R Limão, M I Silva, A Lopes, J Caiado, J Cosme, E Alonso, J Marcelino, F Cabral Duarte, N P Fernandes, M Neto, E Pedro, M Branco Ferreira, A Spínola Santos
Summary: Background.Hereditary angioedema (HAE) poses a high burden of disease, being its epidemiological and clinical data heterogeneous among countries, with no recent published studies concerning Portuguese patients. Therefore, we aimed to raise awareness of HAE and to contribute to clinical knowledge. Methods. An observational, descriptive, retrospective, and cross-sectional study was performed, that included a cohort of 126 patients followed in a single Portuguese Center. Results. We observed a high prevalence of HAE-C1-INH type II (45.2% of patients). Most HAE patients (67.4%) presented the initial manifestations of the disease before adulthood, at a mean age of 12.6 ± 8.4 years. However, we found a long delay in HAE diagnosis, especially in those without family history (mean 20.7 ± 17.3 years). Stress was the most common trigger, followed by trauma and infection. Symptoms involving different systems were increasingly reported with increased disease duration. Cutaneous symptoms (95.0%) were more frequent, followed by gastrointestinal (80.7%), and respiratory symptoms (50.4%). HAE symptoms led to abdominal surgery in 22 (17.5%) patients and induced laryngeal edema requiring intubation/tracheostomy in 8 (6.3%) patients. Most patients were under long-term prophylaxis, mainly with attenuated androgens (62.7% of patients). Conclusions. The correct distinction between HAE and other common causes of angioedema is critical, allowing reduction of diagnostic delay, improvement of adequate management, and ultimately improving outcomes and quality of life of HAE patients.
摘要:遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)是一种负担很重的疾病,其流行病学和临床数据在不同国家之间存在差异,最近发表的研究也没有涉及葡萄牙患者。因此,我们旨在提高人们对HAE的认识,并为临床知识的普及做出贡献。我们进行了一项观察性、描述性、回顾性和横断面研究,研究对象包括葡萄牙一家中心随访的 126 名患者。我们发现 HAE-C1-INH II 型的发病率很高(占患者总数的 45.2%)。大多数 HAE 患者(67.4%)在成年前就出现了最初的疾病表现,平均年龄为 12.6 ± 8.4 岁。然而,我们发现 HAE 的诊断延迟了很长时间,尤其是那些没有家族病史的患者(平均 20.7 ± 17.3 岁)。压力是最常见的诱发因素,其次是创伤和感染。随着病程的延长,涉及不同系统的症状也越来越多。皮肤症状(95.0%)更为常见,其次是胃肠道症状(80.7%)和呼吸道症状(50.4%)。22例(17.5%)患者因出现HAE症状而需要进行腹部手术,8例(6.3%)患者因出现喉头水肿而需要进行插管/气管造口术。正确区分HAE和其他常见的血管性水肿病因至关重要,可减少诊断延误,改善适当的管理,最终改善HAE患者的预后和生活质量。
{"title":"Hereditary angioedema: 24 years of experience in a Portuguese reference center.","authors":"C Varandas, L Esteves Caldeira, S L Silva, C Costa, R Limão, M I Silva, A Lopes, J Caiado, J Cosme, E Alonso, J Marcelino, F Cabral Duarte, N P Fernandes, M Neto, E Pedro, M Branco Ferreira, A Spínola Santos","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.278","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.278","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b>Hereditary angioedema (HAE) poses a high burden of disease, being its epidemiological and clinical data heterogeneous among countries, with no recent published studies concerning Portuguese patients. Therefore, we aimed to raise awareness of HAE and to contribute to clinical knowledge. <b>Methods.</b> An observational, descriptive, retrospective, and cross-sectional study was performed, that included a cohort of 126 patients followed in a single Portuguese Center. <b>Results.</b> We observed a high prevalence of HAE-C1-INH type II (45.2% of patients). Most HAE patients (67.4%) presented the initial manifestations of the disease before adulthood, at a mean age of 12.6 ± 8.4 years. However, we found a long delay in HAE diagnosis, especially in those without family history (mean 20.7 ± 17.3 years). Stress was the most common trigger, followed by trauma and infection. Symptoms involving different systems were increasingly reported with increased disease duration. Cutaneous symptoms (95.0%) were more frequent, followed by gastrointestinal (80.7%), and respiratory symptoms (50.4%). HAE symptoms led to abdominal surgery in 22 (17.5%) patients and induced laryngeal edema requiring intubation/tracheostomy in 8 (6.3%) patients. Most patients were under long-term prophylaxis, mainly with attenuated androgens (62.7% of patients). <b>Conclusions.</b> The correct distinction between HAE and other common causes of angioedema is critical, allowing reduction of diagnostic delay, improvement of adequate management, and ultimately improving outcomes and quality of life of HAE patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"210-218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10705432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-05-28DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.343
R Gallo, I Trave, G Gasparini, R Castelli, G Merlo, A Parodi, E Cozzani
{"title":"Salt dependent aquagenic urticaria: nine new cases and proposal for a diagnostic work-up.","authors":"R Gallo, I Trave, G Gasparini, R Castelli, G Merlo, A Parodi, E Cozzani","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.343","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.343","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"235-238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141174638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-03-28DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.339
A M Marra, C M Rossi, M A Piga, G Moroncini, M B Bilò
Summary: Eosinophil-associated diseases (EADs) refer to heterogeneous conditions in which eosinophils are believed to play critical pathological roles. They encompass common respiratory conditions, such as asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), less common primary eosinophilic disorders of gastrointestinal tract, and rare conditions including eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A literature search was carried out in January 2024 in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases using the PubMed search engine (PubMed, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD). We focused on blood eosinophilia and hypereosinophilia. A diagnostic workup is proposed. From allergist's point of view, we focused the review on 4 groups of eosinophilic disorders of specific interest. Our increased understanding of type 2 inflammation and biology has recently led to development of highly effective precision targeted therapies that are now approved for a growing number of eosinophilic disorders. Novel targeted biologics have a major impact on treatment strategies and have resulted in major advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of these disorders. In the context of EADs, according to the heterogeneity of eosinophilic disorders a multidisciplinary approach should be adopted. Allergists and Clinical Immunologists play an important role as they have a clear understanding of the eosinophilic inflammation and the role of cytokines and are trained to recognize and characterize type 2 (T2) inflammation and its associated pathologies.
{"title":"Eosinophil-associated diseases: the Allergist's and Clinical Immunologist's perspective.","authors":"A M Marra, C M Rossi, M A Piga, G Moroncini, M B Bilò","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.339","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.339","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Eosinophil-associated diseases (EADs) refer to heterogeneous conditions in which eosinophils are believed to play critical pathological roles. They encompass common respiratory conditions, such as asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), less common primary eosinophilic disorders of gastrointestinal tract, and rare conditions including eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A literature search was carried out in January 2024 in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases using the PubMed search engine (PubMed, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD). We focused on blood eosinophilia and hypereosinophilia. A diagnostic workup is proposed. From allergist's point of view, we focused the review on 4 groups of eosinophilic disorders of specific interest. Our increased understanding of type 2 inflammation and biology has recently led to development of highly effective precision targeted therapies that are now approved for a growing number of eosinophilic disorders. Novel targeted biologics have a major impact on treatment strategies and have resulted in major advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of these disorders. In the context of EADs, according to the heterogeneity of eosinophilic disorders a multidisciplinary approach should be adopted. Allergists and Clinical Immunologists play an important role as they have a clear understanding of the eosinophilic inflammation and the role of cytokines and are trained to recognize and characterize type 2 (T2) inflammation and its associated pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"195-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140305244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2023-09-15DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.313
A Xavier de Almeida, T Satnarine, J Gebbia, H A Sampson, G Kleiner, M Gans
{"title":"IgE-mediated flaxseed allergy in non-atopic toddler polysensitized to tree nuts but tolerating other seeds.","authors":"A Xavier de Almeida, T Satnarine, J Gebbia, H A Sampson, G Kleiner, M Gans","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.313","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.313","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"233-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-02DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.356
D Villalta, D Visentini, F Pesente, V Grossi, D Macchia, L Cecchi, E Scala, M Barrale, R Onida, I Brusca
Summary: Background. Gibberellin Regulated Proteins (GRPs) are small glycoproteins that induce allergy to various types of fruit. This study aimed to evaluate co-sensitization to cypress pollen and other molecules responsible for fruit allergy, such as nsLTP (Pru p 3), PR-10 (Bet v1), and Profilin (Bet v2). Methods. Sixty subjects sensitized to peach GRP (Pru p 7) were consecutively recruited from four Italian centers: 28 males and 32 females (mean age 37.9 years; range 11-79). Specific IgE for Pru p 7, Pru p 3, Bet v 1, Bet v 2, cypress pollen extract (Cup s), and Cup a 1 were determined in all subjects. Results. Sensitization rates to Cup s, Cup a 1, Pru p 3, Bet v 1, and Bet v 2 in the entire studied population were 90.0%, 83.3%, 45.8%, 40.0%, and 30.0%, respectively. In subjects residing in Northern Italy, the respective sensitization rates were 96.4%, 80.0%, 50.0%, 73.3%, and 40.0%, while in those residing in Southern Italy, they were 83.3%, 86.7%, 40.0%, 6.7%, and 20.0%. The only significant difference was observed for PR-10 (p less than 0.0001) Co-sensitization to PR-10 was found to be associated with a reduced risk of anaphylaxis (OR: 0.125). Allergic reactions were most commonly triggered by peach (26/40), followed by orange (12/40), with other foods being less frequently implicated. Conclusions. This study confirms a high association between sensitization to Pru p 7 and cypress pollen and highlights a high percentage of co-sensitization to nsLTP, PR-10, and profilin. PR-10 emerged as a protective factor against anaphylaxis.
摘要:背景。赤霉素调节蛋白(GRPs)是一种小糖蛋白,可诱发对各种水果的过敏。本研究旨在评估对柏树花粉和其他导致水果过敏的分子(如 nsLTP (Pru p 3)、PR-10 (Bet v1) 和 Profilin (Bet v2))的共敏性。研究方法从意大利的四个中心连续招募了 60 名对桃子 GRP(Pru p 7)过敏的受试者:28 名男性和 32 名女性(平均年龄 37.9 岁;年龄范围 11-79)。测定了所有受试者对 Pru p 7、Pru p 3、Bet v 1、Bet v 2、柏树花粉提取物(Cup s)和 Cup a 1 的特异性 IgE。结果显示所有研究对象对 Cup s、Cup a 1、Pru p 3、Bet v 1 和 Bet v 2 的过敏率分别为 90.0%、83.3%、45.8%、40.0% 和 30.0%。居住在意大利北部的受试者的致敏率分别为 96.4%、80.0%、50.0%、73.3% 和 40.0%,而居住在意大利南部的受试者的致敏率分别为 83.3%、86.7%、40.0%、6.7% 和 20.0%。对 PR-10 的共同过敏与过敏性休克的风险降低有关(OR:0.125)。过敏反应最常见的诱因是桃子(26/40),其次是橘子(12/40),其他食物较少引起过敏反应。结论这项研究证实了对 Pru p 7 和柏树花粉过敏之间的高度关联性,并强调了对 nsLTP、PR-10 和 profilin 共同过敏的高比例。PR-10 是过敏性休克的保护因素。
{"title":"Co-sensitizations to Gibberellin Regulated Proteins (GRPs) in Italy: results of a polycentric study.","authors":"D Villalta, D Visentini, F Pesente, V Grossi, D Macchia, L Cecchi, E Scala, M Barrale, R Onida, I Brusca","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.356","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Gibberellin Regulated Proteins (GRPs) are small glycoproteins that induce allergy to various types of fruit. This study aimed to evaluate co-sensitization to cypress pollen and other molecules responsible for fruit allergy, such as nsLTP (Pru p 3), PR-10 (Bet v1), and Profilin (Bet v2). <b>Methods.</b> Sixty subjects sensitized to peach GRP (Pru p 7) were consecutively recruited from four Italian centers: 28 males and 32 females (mean age 37.9 years; range 11-79). Specific IgE for Pru p 7, Pru p 3, Bet v 1, Bet v 2, cypress pollen extract (Cup s), and Cup a 1 were determined in all subjects. <b>Results.</b> Sensitization rates to Cup s, Cup a 1, Pru p 3, Bet v 1, and Bet v 2 in the entire studied population were 90.0%, 83.3%, 45.8%, 40.0%, and 30.0%, respectively. In subjects residing in Northern Italy, the respective sensitization rates were 96.4%, 80.0%, 50.0%, 73.3%, and 40.0%, while in those residing in Southern Italy, they were 83.3%, 86.7%, 40.0%, 6.7%, and 20.0%. The only significant difference was observed for PR-10 (p less than 0.0001) Co-sensitization to PR-10 was found to be associated with a reduced risk of anaphylaxis (OR: 0.125). Allergic reactions were most commonly triggered by peach (26/40), followed by orange (12/40), with other foods being less frequently implicated. <b>Conclusions.</b> This study confirms a high association between sensitization to Pru p 7 and cypress pollen and highlights a high percentage of co-sensitization to nsLTP, PR-10, and profilin. PR-10 emerged as a protective factor against anaphylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141874510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-31DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.354
A Teixeira, F Carvalhosa, M Ferreira Lopes, M Pinheiro, I Pádua
{"title":"Online food allergen labeling: is it a matter of concern?","authors":"A Teixeira, F Carvalhosa, M Ferreira Lopes, M Pinheiro, I Pádua","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.354","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141855235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}