Pub Date : 2024-06-24DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.346
Ö Özdemir
{"title":"Adrenalin use in Kounis syndrome: a well-unknown entity.","authors":"Ö Özdemir","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.346","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.346","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141442374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-28DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.342
J Pei, Z Ding, L Cai, H Yang, Y Tao, C Huang
Summary: Background. Epistaxis is frequently observed in allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. However, few studies focus on the outcome of epistaxis with treatment of AR patients. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of AR patients with epistaxis treated with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Methods. A total of 74 patients aged 4-60 years with house dust mite (HDM)-induced AR accompanied by epistaxis and who completed 1 year of SLIT treatment with standard Dermatophagoides farinae (D. farinae) drops were enrolled in this study. The symptom scores, total medication scores (TMS), combined symptom and medication score (CSMS), visual analog scales (VAS), and bleeding score (BS) were assessed, as well as the nasal endoscopic examinations were performed to observe nasal signs. Results. The levels of symptom scores, TMS, CSMS, VAS, and BS at 0.5 year and 1 year of SLIT treatment were significantly lower than those at the baseline (all p less than 0.01). Also, statistical differences were seen in CSMS (p less than 0.05) and VAS (p less than 0.01) between 0.5 year and 1 year. As expected, BS was positively correlated with CSMS (r = 0.617, 95% CI 0.517-0.699) and VAS (r = 0.777, 95% CI 0.719-0.822) at all three time points. Conclusions. SLIT with D. farinae drops was effective and safe for AR patients with epistaxis, resulting in improving the symptoms of rhinitis while relieving the symptoms of epistaxis.
{"title":"Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of Dermatophagoides farinae drops in the treatment of allergic rhinitis with epistaxis.","authors":"J Pei, Z Ding, L Cai, H Yang, Y Tao, C Huang","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.342","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.342","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Epistaxis is frequently observed in allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. However, few studies focus on the outcome of epistaxis with treatment of AR patients. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of AR patients with epistaxis treated with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). <b>Methods.</b> A total of 74 patients aged 4-60 years with house dust mite (HDM)-induced AR accompanied by epistaxis and who completed 1 year of SLIT treatment with standard Dermatophagoides farinae (D. farinae) drops were enrolled in this study. The symptom scores, total medication scores (TMS), combined symptom and medication score (CSMS), visual analog scales (VAS), and bleeding score (BS) were assessed, as well as the nasal endoscopic examinations were performed to observe nasal signs. <b>Results.</b> The levels of symptom scores, TMS, CSMS, VAS, and BS at 0.5 year and 1 year of SLIT treatment were significantly lower than those at the baseline (all p less than 0.01). Also, statistical differences were seen in CSMS (p less than 0.05) and VAS (p less than 0.01) between 0.5 year and 1 year. As expected, BS was positively correlated with CSMS (r = 0.617, 95% CI 0.517-0.699) and VAS (r = 0.777, 95% CI 0.719-0.822) at all three time points. <b>Conclusions.</b> SLIT with D. farinae drops was effective and safe for AR patients with epistaxis, resulting in improving the symptoms of rhinitis while relieving the symptoms of epistaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141174634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-28DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.345
I Roibás-Veiga, P Méndez-Brea, M Castro-Murga, M González-Rivas, P Iriarte-Sotés, R López-Abad, S Cadavid-Moreno, T González-Fernández, S López-Freire, M Armisén, V Rodríguez-Vázquez, C Vidal
{"title":"Outcomes with one-bag desensitization protocol for biologic and chemotherapy agents in 451 procedures.","authors":"I Roibás-Veiga, P Méndez-Brea, M Castro-Murga, M González-Rivas, P Iriarte-Sotés, R López-Abad, S Cadavid-Moreno, T González-Fernández, S López-Freire, M Armisén, V Rodríguez-Vázquez, C Vidal","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.345","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.345","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141174637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-28DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.344
C Novais, A M Cruz, A M Pereira, R Almeida, R Amaral, J A Fonseca, C Jácome
Summary: Background. Identifying factors influencing adherence, such as patients' beliefs about medication, is essential for effective asthma management. This study aims to assess and gain insight into the beliefs of patients with asthma regarding inhaled medication. Methods. This is a secondary analysis of the INSPIRERS studies. Patients aged ≥ 13 y.o., with persistent asthma and a prescription for inhaled controller were recruited from 60 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal from 2017 to 2020. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected in a face-to-face visit. The Specific-Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire was administered 1-week later by telephone interview. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to explore relations between patients' beliefs and characteristics. Results. A total of 552 participants (mean 32.8 ± 17.3 y.o.; 64.5% female) were analysed. The Necessity score (Median 19 [p25-p75 16,22]) was significantly higher than the Concerns score (15 [16,22], p less than 0.001), resulting in a positive Necessity-Concern differential (Median 4 [0,7]). Acceptance (high necessity, low concerns) characterized 61% of participants, while 19% were ambivalent (high necessity, high concerns). Adolescents exhibited lower Necessity (Median 16 vs 20; p less than 0.001) and Concerns scores (Median 11 vs 15; p = 0.002) than adults. In primary care setting, patients had significantly lower Necessity (Median 18 vs 19; p = 0.027) and Concerns (Median 14 vs 15; p = 0.05) compared to the secondary care. Conclusions. A predominantly positive perception of inhaled asthma medication necessity was found, although ambivalence or indifference exists in about 1/5 of patients. Our findings highlight the importance of personalized approaches to address beliefs and optimise patient education.
{"title":"Understanding beliefs about inhaled medication in patients with persistent asthma: a cross-sectional analysis of the INSPIRERS studies.","authors":"C Novais, A M Cruz, A M Pereira, R Almeida, R Amaral, J A Fonseca, C Jácome","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.344","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.344","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Identifying factors influencing adherence, such as patients' beliefs about medication, is essential for effective asthma management. This study aims to assess and gain insight into the beliefs of patients with asthma regarding inhaled medication. <b>Methods.</b> This is a secondary analysis of the INSPIRERS studies. Patients aged ≥ 13 y.o., with persistent asthma and a prescription for inhaled controller were recruited from 60 primary and secondary care centres in Portugal from 2017 to 2020. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected in a face-to-face visit. The Specific-Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire was administered 1-week later by telephone interview. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to explore relations between patients' beliefs and characteristics. <b>Results.</b> A total of 552 participants (mean 32.8 ± 17.3 y.o.; 64.5% female) were analysed. The Necessity score (Median 19 [p25-p75 16,22]) was significantly higher than the Concerns score (15 [16,22], p less than 0.001), resulting in a positive Necessity-Concern differential (Median 4 [0,7]). Acceptance (high necessity, low concerns) characterized 61% of participants, while 19% were ambivalent (high necessity, high concerns). Adolescents exhibited lower Necessity (Median 16 vs 20; p less than 0.001) and Concerns scores (Median 11 vs 15; p = 0.002) than adults. In primary care setting, patients had significantly lower Necessity (Median 18 vs 19; p = 0.027) and Concerns (Median 14 vs 15; p = 0.05) compared to the secondary care. <b>Conclusions.</b> A predominantly positive perception of inhaled asthma medication necessity was found, although ambivalence or indifference exists in about 1/5 of patients. Our findings highlight the importance of personalized approaches to address beliefs and optimise patient education.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141174671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-03-02DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.287
H Duman Şenol, M Geyik, E Topyıldız, A Aygün, F Gülen, E Demir
Summary: Background. There is limited data about the natural course of egg allergy in the literature. We aimed to analyze the factors that can affect the tolerance or persistence of egg allergy. Methods. A total number of 126 IgE- mediated egg allergic patient who had data about tolerance gaining were included in the study. Demographic and laboratory data were recorded retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier curves was used for estimation of resolution and the factors related to resolution by Cox regression model. Results. Among 126 patients 81 (64.2%) had gained tolerance with a median survival time of 48 months (min 12- max 121). Tolerance was gained in 22.2% (28) of these patients in the first 2 years, in 46.8% (49) 2-6 years, 3.1% (4) between 7-12 years. In univariate analysis, no history of anaphylaxis (at initiation or during OFC) (Hazard ratio 2.193; 95%CI 1.309-3.674, p = 0.003), baseline sIgE level less than 8.2 (Hazard ratio 11.292; 95%CI 2.766-46.090, p = 0.001) and baseline egg SPT less than 11 mm (Hazard ratio 2.906; 95%CI 1.424-5.930, p = 0.003) were found to be related to earlier resolution of egg allergy. In multivariate analysis only anaphylaxis was significantly related to later resolution (Hazard ratio: 6.547; 95%CI 15.80-27.434, p = 0.01). Conclusions. Higher levels of egg sIgE, skin prick test induration and anaphylaxis at onset or during oral food challenge, can give hint about persistence of egg allergy.
{"title":"Factors effecting natural course of egg allergy.","authors":"H Duman Şenol, M Geyik, E Topyıldız, A Aygün, F Gülen, E Demir","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.287","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> There is limited data about the natural course of egg allergy in the literature. We aimed to analyze the factors that can affect the tolerance or persistence of egg allergy. <b>Methods.</b> A total number of 126 IgE- mediated egg allergic patient who had data about tolerance gaining were included in the study. Demographic and laboratory data were recorded retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier curves was used for estimation of resolution and the factors related to resolution by Cox regression model. <b>Results.</b> Among 126 patients 81 (64.2%) had gained tolerance with a median survival time of 48 months (min 12- max 121). Tolerance was gained in 22.2% (28) of these patients in the first 2 years, in 46.8% (49) 2-6 years, 3.1% (4) between 7-12 years. In univariate analysis, no history of anaphylaxis (at initiation or during OFC) (Hazard ratio 2.193; 95%CI 1.309-3.674, p = 0.003), baseline sIgE level less than 8.2 (Hazard ratio 11.292; 95%CI 2.766-46.090, p = 0.001) and baseline egg SPT less than 11 mm (Hazard ratio 2.906; 95%CI 1.424-5.930, p = 0.003) were found to be related to earlier resolution of egg allergy. In multivariate analysis only anaphylaxis was significantly related to later resolution (Hazard ratio: 6.547; 95%CI 15.80-27.434, p = 0.01). <b>Conclusions.</b> Higher levels of egg sIgE, skin prick test induration and anaphylaxis at onset or during oral food challenge, can give hint about persistence of egg allergy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"116-120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10154642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-09-06DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.312
J Pfieffer, K Wehmeier, K Gee, T DeSanto, E Yousef
Summary: Background. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is a potential disease-modifying therapy effective for treatment of various allergic disorders. Pain and fear are common concerns of children, which can pose stress and result in negative experiences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three marketed distraction devices and ethyl chloride spray (a routinely used topical anesthetic agent for painful procedures), the current clinical standard of care in reducing the perception of needle pain during SCIT administration in children. Methods. 40 children, aged 4-17 years, receiving SCIT with use of one of three alternative pain therapies or with standard practice were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the pain-modifying interventions. The three interventional groups were ShotBlocker® (Bionix, Toledo, OH, USA), Buzzy® I (Pain Care Labs, Atlanta, GA, USA) (vibration only), and Buzzy® II (vibration with ice). Control group was ethyl chloride spray. The study consisted of two visits during SCIT administration process. Results. Of these 40 children, 12 received the ShotBlocker, 8 received the Buzzy I, 11 received the Buzzy II, and 9 received ethyl chloride spray (control group). Conclusions. There were no significant differences found between each of the distraction devices and between the control group. Type II error/false negative finding cannot be ruled out because of a small sample. Therefore, we cannot conclude that no true difference exists between each distraction device and the control group simply because of occurrence of a non-significant P-value in our study.
{"title":"Evaluation of pain-alleviating strategies during allergy shots (subcutaneous immunotherapy): a randomized controlled pilot study.","authors":"J Pfieffer, K Wehmeier, K Gee, T DeSanto, E Yousef","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.312","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is a potential disease-modifying therapy effective for treatment of various allergic disorders. Pain and fear are common concerns of children, which can pose stress and result in negative experiences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three marketed distraction devices and ethyl chloride spray (a routinely used topical anesthetic agent for painful procedures), the current clinical standard of care in reducing the perception of needle pain during SCIT administration in children. <b>Methods.</b> 40 children, aged 4-17 years, receiving SCIT with use of one of three alternative pain therapies or with standard practice were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the pain-modifying interventions. The three interventional groups were ShotBlocker<sup>®</sup> (Bionix, Toledo, OH, USA), Buzzy<sup>®</sup> I (Pain Care Labs, Atlanta, GA, USA) (vibration only), and Buzzy<sup>®</sup> II (vibration with ice). Control group was ethyl chloride spray. The study consisted of two visits during SCIT administration process. <b>Results.</b> Of these 40 children, 12 received the ShotBlocker, 8 received the Buzzy I, 11 received the Buzzy II, and 9 received ethyl chloride spray (control group). <b>Conclusions.</b> There were no significant differences found between each of the distraction devices and between the control group. Type II error/false negative finding cannot be ruled out because of a small sample. Therefore, we cannot conclude that no true difference exists between each distraction device and the control group simply because of occurrence of a non-significant P-value in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"128-136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10161747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-02-14DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.283
S Asero
{"title":"Atopic status and thyroid autoimmunity do not predict omalizumab response in severe chronic spontaneous urticaria patients.","authors":"S Asero","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.283","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.283","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"141-143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10699852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-09-15DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.315
K Horimukai, M Kinoshita, N Takahata
Summary: Background. Global increase in buckwheat consumption has led to a surge in buckwheat allergy reports. However, studies scrutinizing the predictive accuracy of buckwheat-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody levels in correlation with symptom manifestation remain limited. A critical concern is the discrepancy between the total buckwheat amount featured in prior studies and the quantity consumed per occasion. We aimed to determine open Oral Food Challenge (OFC) positivity rates with buckwheat, using a single serving of boiled buckwheat noodles, and assess the predictability of positive responses using buckwheat-specific IgE levels. Methods. Patients aged 20 years or younger, suspected of buckwheat allergy, were subjected to an OFC involving consumption of 100 g (4,800 mg of protein) of boiled buckwheat noodles for those under six years, and 200 g (9,600 mg of protein) for those six years or older. The predictive accuracy of the OFC, corresponding with buckwheat-specific IgE antibody levels, was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results. Our study involved 80 patients who undertook a buckwheat OFC. Among these, 14 (17.5%) tested positive for a buckwheat allergy, with 3 (3.8%) developing anaphylaxis. The comparative analysis of buckwheat-specific IgE antibody levels did not offer a reliable predictive measure for OFC outcomes. However, a past history of symptom manifestation following buckwheat consumption was significantly correlated with a positive OFC. Conclusions. Forecasting OFC outcomes based on buckwheat-specific IgE antibody levels poses a challenge, even when taking into account the total quantity of buckwheat that can be consumed in a single occasion.
{"title":"Predicting the outcome of the buckwheat oral challenge test: a first evaluation assuming a single serving of boiled buckwheat noodles.","authors":"K Horimukai, M Kinoshita, N Takahata","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.315","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Global increase in buckwheat consumption has led to a surge in buckwheat allergy reports. However, studies scrutinizing the predictive accuracy of buckwheat-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody levels in correlation with symptom manifestation remain limited. A critical concern is the discrepancy between the total buckwheat amount featured in prior studies and the quantity consumed per occasion. We aimed to determine open Oral Food Challenge (OFC) positivity rates with buckwheat, using a single serving of boiled buckwheat noodles, and assess the predictability of positive responses using buckwheat-specific IgE levels. <b>Methods.</b> Patients aged 20 years or younger, suspected of buckwheat allergy, were subjected to an OFC involving consumption of 100 g (4,800 mg of protein) of boiled buckwheat noodles for those under six years, and 200 g (9,600 mg of protein) for those six years or older. The predictive accuracy of the OFC, corresponding with buckwheat-specific IgE antibody levels, was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. <b>Results.</b> Our study involved 80 patients who undertook a buckwheat OFC. Among these, 14 (17.5%) tested positive for a buckwheat allergy, with 3 (3.8%) developing anaphylaxis. The comparative analysis of buckwheat-specific IgE antibody levels did not offer a reliable predictive measure for OFC outcomes. However, a past history of symptom manifestation following buckwheat consumption was significantly correlated with a positive OFC. <b>Conclusions.</b> Forecasting OFC outcomes based on buckwheat-specific IgE antibody levels poses a challenge, even when taking into account the total quantity of buckwheat that can be consumed in a single occasion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"121-127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-01-13DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.280
M S Zamarro Parra, Y Petryk Petryk, S San Román Sirvent, C Navarro Garrido, A I Escudero Pastor, J C Miralles López, A Carbonell Martínez
Summary: Food allergy is an increasing problem for population, and treatments inducing tolerance using sublingual immunotherapy is currently under study. Our aim as allergists is to achieve tolerance to sublingual allergen specific immunotherapy with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT-peach). We present a case report consisting of a 40-year-old woman with anaphylactic reactions after eating fruit and other plant-foods due to sensitization to nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTP). Her diagnose was LTP-syndrome. This protein is the main pannallergen in our area and causes crossed reaction to multiple plant foods. The principal allergen in this syndrome is rPru p3, present in peach and most vegetables, fruits, nuts and grains. Serum specific IgE levels were performed using microarrays and positive for seven nsLTPs: rAra h9, rCor a8, nJug r3, rPru p3, rTri a 14, nArt v3 and rPla a3. Immediate reaction to SLIT in the fourth month of maintenance-dose led us to interrupt pru p3 immunotherapy. Immediate reaction to omalizumab in the fourth dose in hospital consisting in anaphylaxis prompted us to switch to dupilumab. After four months with this monoclonal antibody, we reintroduced sublingual immunotherapy with pru p3 SLIT-peach® achieving maintenance dose of four drops a day with no clinical reactions. SLIT-peach® in our patient is crucial for her due to her restricted diet, the severity of reactions and lack of quality of life measured by Europevall questionary. There are no cases reported for dupilumab in this use.
{"title":"Dupilumab to induce tolerance to SLIT-Melocotón®.","authors":"M S Zamarro Parra, Y Petryk Petryk, S San Román Sirvent, C Navarro Garrido, A I Escudero Pastor, J C Miralles López, A Carbonell Martínez","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.280","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.280","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Food allergy is an increasing problem for population, and treatments inducing tolerance using sublingual immunotherapy is currently under study. Our aim as allergists is to achieve tolerance to sublingual allergen specific immunotherapy with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT-peach). We present a case report consisting of a 40-year-old woman with anaphylactic reactions after eating fruit and other plant-foods due to sensitization to nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTP). Her diagnose was LTP-syndrome. This protein is the main pannallergen in our area and causes crossed reaction to multiple plant foods. The principal allergen in this syndrome is rPru p3, present in peach and most vegetables, fruits, nuts and grains. Serum specific IgE levels were performed using microarrays and positive for seven nsLTPs: rAra h9, rCor a8, nJug r3, rPru p3, rTri a 14, nArt v3 and rPla a3. Immediate reaction to SLIT in the fourth month of maintenance-dose led us to interrupt pru p3 immunotherapy. Immediate reaction to omalizumab in the fourth dose in hospital consisting in anaphylaxis prompted us to switch to dupilumab. After four months with this monoclonal antibody, we reintroduced sublingual immunotherapy with pru p3 SLIT-peach<sup>®</sup> achieving maintenance dose of four drops a day with no clinical reactions. SLIT-peach<sup>®</sup> in our patient is crucial for her due to her restricted diet, the severity of reactions and lack of quality of life measured by Europevall questionary. There are no cases reported for dupilumab in this use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"137-140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9072718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2023-12-06DOI: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.319
J F Ribeiro, C Pedrosa
Summary: Background. The review was structured in the following sections: 1) Cow's Milk Proteins Allergy (CMA), 2) Food Allergy to Peanuts and 3) Prevention of Food Allergy. In CMA, studies indicate that extensively hydrolyzed casein formula supplemented with Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG aids in acquiring tolerance to cow's milk proteins, resolving gastrointestinal symptoms and preventing of other allergic manifestations. In peanut oral immunotherapy (OI), supplementation with Lactobacillus Rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 appears to promote sustained desensitization. However, the evidence supporting probiotics for preventing food allergies lacks robustness. Current evidence supports the use of oligosaccharides from breast milk in the first months of life for preventing atopic dermatitis, FA and asthma Methods. A PubMed/Medline search was carried out on articles published between 2011 and 2021 with the following query: ("Food Hypersensitivity"[Mesh]) AND (("Probiotics"[Mesh]) OR ("Prebiotics"[Mesh])). Subsequently, the titles and abstracts were analysed and selected according to established criteria. After full reading of these articles, 54 were included and a narrative review was performed. Results. The review was structured in the following sections: 1) Cow's Milk Proteins Allergy (CMA), 2) Food Allergy to Peanuts and 3) Prevention of Food Allergy. In CMA, studies indicate that extensively hydrolyzed casein formula supplemented with Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG aids in acquiring tolerance to cow's milk proteins, resolving gastrointestinal symptoms and preventing of other allergic manifestations. In peanut oral immunotherapy (OI), supplementation with Lactobacillus Rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 appears to promote sustained desensitization. However, the evidence supporting probiotics for preventing food allergies lacks robustness. Current evidence supports the use of oligosaccharides from breast milk in the first months of life for preventing atopic dermatitis, FA and asthma. Conclusions. The potential of probiotics to be used as therapeutic adjuvants in CMA and peanut OI is promising. However, there is inconsistency regarding the type of probiotic, the dose and duration of supplementation. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of probiotics and prebiotics in FA.
摘要:背景。食物过敏(FA)的发病率有所上升,这可能是肠道菌群失调、环境或遗传因素造成的后果。目前,尚无针对食物过敏症补充益生菌或益生元的正式适应症。本综述旨在分析益生菌和益生元在预防和治疗食物过敏症中的作用。方法。对2011年至2021年间发表的文章进行了PubMed/Medline检索,并进行了以下查询:(食物过敏"[Mesh])和(("益生菌"[Mesh])或("益生元"[Mesh]))。随后,根据既定标准对标题和摘要进行了分析和筛选。在充分阅读这些文章后,54 篇文章被纳入其中,并进行了叙述性综述。结果。综述分为以下几个部分:i) 牛乳蛋白过敏(CMA);ii) 花生食物过敏;iii) 预防食物过敏。在 CMA 方面,多项研究证实,广泛水解酪蛋白配方辅以鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG 有助于提早获得对牛奶蛋白的耐受性、缓解胃肠道症状和预防其他过敏表现。在花生口服免疫疗法(OI)中,补充鼠李糖乳杆菌 CGMCC 1.3724 似乎对诱导持续的脱敏反应有积极影响。关于使用益生菌预防 FA,这一假设缺乏有力的科学证据来证实其有效性。目前的证据支持在婴儿出生后的头几个月使用母乳中的低聚糖来预防特应性皮炎、过敏性皮炎和哮喘。结论。益生菌作为 CMA 和花生 OI 的治疗佐剂的潜力巨大。然而,益生菌的种类、剂量和补充时间并不一致。需要进一步研究以明确益生菌和益生元在 FA 中的作用。
{"title":"Probiotics, prebiotics and food allergy: a review.","authors":"J F Ribeiro, C Pedrosa","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.319","DOIUrl":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.319","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> The review was structured in the following sections: 1) Cow's Milk Proteins Allergy (CMA), 2) Food Allergy to Peanuts and 3) Prevention of Food Allergy. In CMA, studies indicate that extensively hydrolyzed casein formula supplemented with <i>Lactobacillus Rhamnosus</i> GG aids in acquiring tolerance to cow's milk proteins, resolving gastrointestinal symptoms and preventing of other allergic manifestations. In peanut oral immunotherapy (OI), supplementation with <i>Lactobacillus Rhamnosus</i> CGMCC 1.3724 appears to promote sustained desensitization. However, the evidence supporting probiotics for preventing food allergies lacks robustness. Current evidence supports the use of oligosaccharides from breast milk in the first months of life for preventing atopic dermatitis, FA and asthma <b>Methods.</b> A PubMed/Medline search was carried out on articles published between 2011 and 2021 with the following query: (\"Food Hypersensitivity\"[Mesh]) AND ((\"Probiotics\"[Mesh]) OR (\"Prebiotics\"[Mesh])). Subsequently, the titles and abstracts were analysed and selected according to established criteria. After full reading of these articles, 54 were included and a narrative review was performed. <b>Results.</b> The review was structured in the following sections: 1) Cow's Milk Proteins Allergy (CMA), 2) Food Allergy to Peanuts and 3) Prevention of Food Allergy. In CMA, studies indicate that extensively hydrolyzed casein formula supplemented with <i>Lactobacillus Rhamnosus</i> GG aids in acquiring tolerance to cow's milk proteins, resolving gastrointestinal symptoms and preventing of other allergic manifestations. In peanut oral immunotherapy (OI), supplementation with <i>Lactobacillus Rhamnosus</i> CGMCC 1.3724 appears to promote sustained desensitization. However, the evidence supporting probiotics for preventing food allergies lacks robustness. Current evidence supports the use of oligosaccharides from breast milk in the first months of life for preventing atopic dermatitis, FA and asthma. <b>Conclusions.</b> The potential of probiotics to be used as therapeutic adjuvants in CMA and peanut OI is promising. However, there is inconsistency regarding the type of probiotic, the dose and duration of supplementation. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of probiotics and prebiotics in FA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":" ","pages":"99-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138487066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}