Pub Date : 2024-10-11DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115070
Oleksandr Dudnichenko , Konstantin Penkov , Meredith McKean , Mario Mandalà , Mariia Kukushkina , Timothy Panella , Tibor Csőszi , Paola Gerletti , Mahgull Thakur , Anna Polli , Alessandra di Pietro , Dirk Schadendorf
Background
BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are approved for BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma. Combinations of BRAFi/MEKi with CPIs may further improve outcomes and could offer additional treatment strategies.
Methods
STARBOARD (NCT04657991) is a phase III study with an initial safety lead-in (SLI) phase conducted to determine the recommended phase III dose (RP3D) for encorafenib in combination with binimetinib and pembrolizumab. Patients with untreated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant cutaneous melanoma received binimetinib 45 mg twice daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus encorafenib 450 mg once daily (COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab) or 300 mg once daily (COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab). The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response, time to response, and duration of response. Progression-free survival was assessed post hoc.
Results
In the SLI, the median follow-up duration was 19.4 months. Twenty patients received COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab and 17 received COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab. DLTs occurred in 1 of 17 DLT-evaluable patients in the COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab arm and in 2 of 17 DLT-evaluable patients in the COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab arm. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either treatment arm. The overall response rate was 65.0 % in the COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab arm and 47.1 % in the COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab arm.
Conclusion
The STARBOARD SLI showed that safety across the cohorts was generally comparable to the known safety profile of each agent. The standard dose regimen of COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab was chosen as the RP3D.
{"title":"First-line encorafenib plus binimetinib and pembrolizumab for advanced BRAF V600-mutant melanoma: Safety lead-in results from the randomized phase III STARBOARD study","authors":"Oleksandr Dudnichenko , Konstantin Penkov , Meredith McKean , Mario Mandalà , Mariia Kukushkina , Timothy Panella , Tibor Csőszi , Paola Gerletti , Mahgull Thakur , Anna Polli , Alessandra di Pietro , Dirk Schadendorf","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115070","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115070","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are approved for BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma. Combinations of BRAFi/MEKi with CPIs may further improve outcomes and could offer additional treatment strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>STARBOARD (NCT04657991) is a phase III study with an initial safety lead-in (SLI) phase conducted to determine the recommended phase III dose (RP3D) for encorafenib in combination with binimetinib and pembrolizumab. Patients with untreated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant cutaneous melanoma received binimetinib 45 mg twice daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus encorafenib 450 mg once daily (COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab) or 300 mg once daily (COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab). The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response, time to response, and duration of response. Progression-free survival was assessed post hoc.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the SLI, the median follow-up duration was 19.4 months. Twenty patients received COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab and 17 received COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab. DLTs occurred in 1 of 17 DLT-evaluable patients in the COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab arm and in 2 of 17 DLT-evaluable patients in the COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab arm. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either treatment arm. The overall response rate was 65.0 % in the COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab arm and 47.1 % in the COMBO300 plus pembrolizumab arm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The STARBOARD SLI showed that safety across the cohorts was generally comparable to the known safety profile of each agent. The standard dose regimen of COMBO450 plus pembrolizumab was chosen as the RP3D.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115070"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115062
Susanne Singer , Eva Hammerlid , Iwona M. Tomaszewska , Cecilie D. Amdal , Bente B. Herlofson , Marcos Santos , Joaquim Castro Silva , Hisham Mehanna , Amy Fullerton , Teresa Young , Loreto Fernandez Gonzalez , Johanna Inhestern , Monica Pinto , Juan I. Arraras , Noam Yarom , Pierluigi Bonomo , Ingo Baumann , Razvan Galalae , Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis , Naomi Kiyota , Kristin Bjordal
Introduction
Minimal important change estimates (MIC) are useful for interpreting results of clinical research with quality of life (QoL) as an endpoint. For the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer head and neck cancer module, the EORTC QLQ-HN43, no such thresholds are established.
Methods
Head and neck cancer patients under active treatment (n = 503) from 15 countries completed the EORTC QLQ-HN43 three times (t1: before treatment, t2: three months after t1, t3: six months after t1). A subgroup completed a Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ), indicating experienced change from the previous time point in four QoL domains. QoL was assumed to deteriorate after t1 and improve again until t3. The MIC was established using the average of mean differences in SSQ groups (MICmean) and estimates based on logistic regressions (MICpredict). Additionally, minimal detectable changes (MDC) were computed using 0.5 standard deviation and standard error of the mean.
Results
For swallowing, speech, dry mouth, and global QoL, the MIC for deterioration were 13, 14, 26, and 10 respectively. The MIC for improvement were 8 (swallowing), 6 (dry mouth), and 5 (global QoL); no MIC for speech improvement can be presented because of insufficient correlation between change score and anchor. The MDC estimates for deterioration were 15, 14, 15, and 11. For improvement, the MDC estimates were 13, 14, 14, and 11.
Conclusions
Our results underline that no single MIC or MDC can be applied to all EORTC QLQ-HN43 scales, and that the MIC for deterioration seems larger than those for improvement.
引言最小重要变化估计值(MIC)有助于解释以生活质量(QoL)为终点的临床研究结果。来自 15 个国家的正在接受积极治疗的头颈部癌症患者(n = 503)三次完成了 EORTC QLQ-HN43 模块(t1:治疗前,t2:t1 后三个月,t3:t1 后六个月)。一个亚组完成了主观意义问卷(SSQ),显示了与前一个时间点相比在四个 QoL 领域中经历的变化。假定 QoL 在 t1 之后恶化,并在 t3 之前再次改善。根据 SSQ 各组平均差异的平均值(MICmean)和基于逻辑回归的估计值(MICpredict)确定 MIC。结果 在吞咽、言语、口干和整体 QoL 方面,恶化的 MIC 分别为 13、14、26 和 10。言语能力改善的 MIC 值分别为 8(吞咽)、6(口干)和 5(整体 QoL);由于变化分数与锚点之间的相关性不足,因此无法提供言语能力改善的 MIC 值。恶化的 MDC 估计值分别为 15、14、15 和 11。结论我们的研究结果表明,没有任何一种 MIC 或 MDC 可适用于所有 EORTC QLQ-HN43 量表,恶化的 MIC 似乎大于改善的 MIC。
{"title":"The european organisation for research and treatment of cancer head and neck cancer module (EORTC QLQ-HN43): Estimates for minimal important difference and minimal important change","authors":"Susanne Singer , Eva Hammerlid , Iwona M. Tomaszewska , Cecilie D. Amdal , Bente B. Herlofson , Marcos Santos , Joaquim Castro Silva , Hisham Mehanna , Amy Fullerton , Teresa Young , Loreto Fernandez Gonzalez , Johanna Inhestern , Monica Pinto , Juan I. Arraras , Noam Yarom , Pierluigi Bonomo , Ingo Baumann , Razvan Galalae , Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis , Naomi Kiyota , Kristin Bjordal","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115062","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115062","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Minimal important change estimates (MIC) are useful for interpreting results of clinical research with quality of life (QoL) as an endpoint. For the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer head and neck cancer module, the EORTC QLQ-HN43, no such thresholds are established.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Head and neck cancer patients under active treatment (n = 503) from 15 countries completed the EORTC QLQ-HN43 three times (t1: before treatment, t2: three months after t1, t3: six months after t1). A subgroup completed a Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ), indicating experienced change from the previous time point in four QoL domains. QoL was assumed to deteriorate after t1 and improve again until t3. The MIC was established using the average of mean differences in SSQ groups (MIC<sub>mean</sub>) and estimates based on logistic regressions (MIC<sub>predict</sub>). Additionally, minimal detectable changes (MDC) were computed using 0.5 standard deviation and standard error of the mean.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For <em>swallowing</em>, <em>speech</em>, <em>dry mouth,</em> and <em>global QoL</em>, the MIC for deterioration were 13, 14, 26, and 10 respectively. The MIC for improvement were 8 (<em>swallowing</em>), 6 (<em>dry mouth</em>), and 5 (<em>global QoL</em>); no MIC for <em>speech</em> improvement can be presented because of insufficient correlation between change score and anchor. The MDC estimates for deterioration were 15, 14, 15, and 11. For improvement, the MDC estimates were 13, 14, 14, and 11.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results underline that no single MIC or MDC can be applied to all EORTC QLQ-HN43 scales, and that the MIC for deterioration seems larger than those for improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115062"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142438224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115064
Khaled Elsayad , Emmanuella Guenova , Chalid Assaf , Jan P. Nicolay , Franz Trautinger , Rudolf Stadler , Cora Waldstein , Tom Boterberg , Paul Meijnders , Youlia Kirova , Gabor Dobos , Victor Duque-Santana , Elena Riggenbach , Wael Elsheshtawy , Anne Niezink , Evangelia Papadavid , Julia Scarisbrick , Maarten Vermeer , Karen J. Neelis , Martine Bagot , Dora Correia
The number of primary cutaneous lymphoma patients receiving low-dose radiotherapy is increasing, though controlled clinical trials defining the standard radiation dose for each specific entity have not yet been completed. Radiation oncologists are left with making highly individualized decisions that would be better enriched by additional clinical evidence. In this expert opinion, we aim to provide a clear recommendation to improve the current practice of radiation oncology. In addition, existing literature has been reviewed to develop recommendations for all types of primary cutaneous lymphoma. A prospective trial is urgently needed to identify the factors influencing patient outcomes following different radiation doses.
{"title":"Radiotherapy in cutaneous lymphomas: Recommendations from the EORTC cutaneous lymphoma tumour group","authors":"Khaled Elsayad , Emmanuella Guenova , Chalid Assaf , Jan P. Nicolay , Franz Trautinger , Rudolf Stadler , Cora Waldstein , Tom Boterberg , Paul Meijnders , Youlia Kirova , Gabor Dobos , Victor Duque-Santana , Elena Riggenbach , Wael Elsheshtawy , Anne Niezink , Evangelia Papadavid , Julia Scarisbrick , Maarten Vermeer , Karen J. Neelis , Martine Bagot , Dora Correia","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115064","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115064","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The number of primary cutaneous lymphoma patients receiving low-dose radiotherapy is increasing, though controlled clinical trials defining the standard radiation dose for each specific entity have not yet been completed. Radiation oncologists are left with making highly individualized decisions that would be better enriched by additional clinical evidence. In this expert opinion, we aim to provide a clear recommendation to improve the current practice of radiation oncology. In addition, existing literature has been reviewed to develop recommendations for all types of primary cutaneous lymphoma. A prospective trial is urgently needed to identify the factors influencing patient outcomes following different radiation doses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115064"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142441257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-05DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115063
Hans H.B. Wenzel , Tine H. Schnack , Maaike A. Van der Aa , Pernille T. Jensen , Claus K. Høgdall , Anna Norberg Hardie , Henrik Falconer , Ruud L.M. Bekkers , Dutch, dANish and sweDish gynaEcoLogIcal ONcology (DANDELION) research group
Background
In the FIGO 2018 classification, women with cervical cancer and a depth of invasion ≤ 5 mm and a horizontal spread of > 7 mm in excisional biopsy with tumour-free margins, are now classified as stage IA instead of IB. This stage shift may reduce the likelihood of surgical lymph node staging. It is therefore crucial to estimate the risk and risk factors of lymph node metastasis (pN+) in this group.
Methods
Women diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2005 and 2022 were identified from nationwide population-based registries from the Netherlands, Denmark, and Sweden. Inclusion criteria were squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, FIGO 2009 stage IB1, a depth of invasion ≤ 5 mm and horizontal spread of > 7–≤ 40 mm. All cases underwent radical hysterectomy or radical trachelectomy, and surgical lymph node staging. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors of pN+.
Results
We included 992 women (pN+ 4.1 %; n = 41). Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) was a significant risk factor of pN+ (odds ratio 4.26, 95 % confidence interval 2.24–8.32). Accordingly, the risk of pN+ was ≥ 7.3 % in LVSI-positive tumours. The risk was lowest in LVSI-negative tumours with a size of > 7–≤ 20 mm (2.2 %), although this varied by depth of invasion and histological subtype (pN+ range 0.6–5.1 %).
Conclusion
Women with LVSI-positive FIGO 2018 IA cervical cancer and a horizontal spread > 7 mm, should undergo surgical lymph node staging. In LVSI-negative tumours, lymph node staging should not be routinely performed; tumour size, depth of invasion and histology should be considered.
{"title":"Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in women with FIGO 2018 IA cervical cancer with a horizontal spread of > 7 mm","authors":"Hans H.B. Wenzel , Tine H. Schnack , Maaike A. Van der Aa , Pernille T. Jensen , Claus K. Høgdall , Anna Norberg Hardie , Henrik Falconer , Ruud L.M. Bekkers , Dutch, dANish and sweDish gynaEcoLogIcal ONcology (DANDELION) research group","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115063","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115063","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the FIGO 2018 classification, women with cervical cancer and a depth of invasion ≤ 5 mm and a horizontal spread of > 7 mm in excisional biopsy with tumour-free margins, are now classified as stage IA instead of IB. This stage shift may reduce the likelihood of surgical lymph node staging. It is therefore crucial to estimate the risk and risk factors of lymph node metastasis (pN+) in this group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Women diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2005 and 2022 were identified from nationwide population-based registries from the Netherlands, Denmark, and Sweden. Inclusion criteria were squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, FIGO 2009 stage IB1, a depth of invasion ≤ 5 mm and horizontal spread of > 7–≤ 40 mm. All cases underwent radical hysterectomy or radical trachelectomy, and surgical lymph node staging. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors of pN+.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 992 women (pN+ 4.1 %; n = 41). Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) was a significant risk factor of pN+ (odds ratio 4.26, 95 % confidence interval 2.24–8.32). Accordingly, the risk of pN+ was ≥ 7.3 % in LVSI-positive tumours. The risk was lowest in LVSI-negative tumours with a size of > 7–≤ 20 mm (2.2 %), although this varied by depth of invasion and histological subtype (pN+ range 0.6–5.1 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Women with LVSI-positive FIGO 2018 IA cervical cancer and a horizontal spread > 7 mm, should undergo surgical lymph node staging. In LVSI-negative tumours, lymph node staging should not be routinely performed; tumour size, depth of invasion and histology should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115063"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142389082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-04DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115054
Viola K. DeTemple , Cathrin Ritter , Nalini Srinivas , Ivelina Spassova , Thilo Gambichler , Svea Hüning , Nikolai Gräger , Ralf Gutzmer , Eva-Bettina Bröcker , Selma Ugurel , David Schrama , Jürgen C. Becker
Background
Presence of micrometastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is currently used to assess prognosis of melanoma patients. The immunoactivity within the SLN is known to be influenced by the primary tumor (PT), which may in turn impact the SLNs’ metastatic state.
Aim
We characterize the temporal dependence and underlying mechanisms of the immunological effects of the PT on the SLN.
Methods
The prognostic value of SLN state as a function of PT removal time was evaluated. To put the results into a functional context, selected PTs and corresponding SLNs were analyzed for gene and protein expression patterns.
Results
In a cohort of 202 patients with known distant metastasis and similar PT prognostic characteristics, SLNs removed before or within one week after the PT (IM-SLN) had a higher incidence of micrometastases than those removed at least one week after the PT (DEL-SLN).
The immunoactivity in IM-SLN was found to be lower than in DEL-SLN. Specifically, in IM-SLNs, T helper 17 / regulatory T-cells were predominant, whereas in DEL-SLNs, cytotoxic γδT-cells were more frequent. The higher immune activity in DEL-SLNs was probably facilitated by CD209+ antigen-presenting cells. Indeed, in PT with high TGFβ expression CD209+ cells appear to be trapped and no increased immunoactivity was observed in DEL-SLN.
Conclusions
Presence of micrometastases in DEL-SLNs have a higher negative prognostic value as in IM-SLNs since they indicate not only a melanoma’s propensity to metastasize, but possibly also its capacity to escape immune responses.
{"title":"Short- and long-term immunosuppressive effects of melanoma influence the prognostic value of the sentinel lymph node status","authors":"Viola K. DeTemple , Cathrin Ritter , Nalini Srinivas , Ivelina Spassova , Thilo Gambichler , Svea Hüning , Nikolai Gräger , Ralf Gutzmer , Eva-Bettina Bröcker , Selma Ugurel , David Schrama , Jürgen C. Becker","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115054","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115054","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Presence of micrometastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is currently used to assess prognosis of melanoma patients. The immunoactivity within the SLN is known to be influenced by the primary tumor (PT), which may in turn impact the SLNs’ metastatic state.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We characterize the temporal dependence and underlying mechanisms of the immunological effects of the PT on the SLN.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The prognostic value of SLN state as a function of PT removal time was evaluated. To put the results into a functional context, selected PTs and corresponding SLNs were analyzed for gene and protein expression patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In a cohort of 202 patients with known distant metastasis and similar PT prognostic characteristics, SLNs removed before or within one week after the PT (IM-SLN) had a higher incidence of micrometastases than those removed at least one week after the PT (DEL-SLN).</div><div>The immunoactivity in IM-SLN was found to be lower than in DEL-SLN. Specifically, in IM-SLNs, T helper 17 / regulatory T-cells were predominant, whereas in DEL-SLNs, cytotoxic γδT-cells were more frequent. The higher immune activity in DEL-SLNs was probably facilitated by CD209<sup>+</sup> antigen-presenting cells. Indeed, in PT with high TGFβ expression CD209<sup>+</sup> cells appear to be trapped and no increased immunoactivity was observed in DEL-SLN.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Presence of micrometastases in DEL-SLNs have a higher negative prognostic value as in IM-SLNs since they indicate not only a melanoma’s propensity to metastasize, but possibly also its capacity to escape immune responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115054"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Response to the Letter re: Real-world outcomes of Italian patients with advanced non-squamous lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus platinum-pemetrexed","authors":"Alessandro Leonetti, Fabiana Perrone, Matteo Puntoni, Giuseppe Maglietta, Caterina Caminiti, Marcello Tiseo","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115057","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115057","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115057"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114350
F.J. de Bie, A.J. van der Sluijs-Gelling, S. Najidh, M.H. Vermeer
{"title":"A-222 Flow cytometry of skin biopsies in CTCL patients during Mogamulizumab treatment","authors":"F.J. de Bie, A.J. van der Sluijs-Gelling, S. Najidh, M.H. Vermeer","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114350","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114350","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 114350"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142416386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114356
Y.-T. Chang, P. Prompsy, S. Kimeswenger, Y.-C. Tsai, D. Ignatova, O. Pavlova, C. Iselin, L. French, M. Levesque, F. Kuonen, M. Bobrowicz, P. Brunner, S. Pascolo, W. Hoetzenecker, E. Guenova
{"title":"A-285 MHC-I Upregulation Safeguards Neoplastic T Cells in the Skin Against NK Cell-mediated Eradication in Mycosis Fungoides","authors":"Y.-T. Chang, P. Prompsy, S. Kimeswenger, Y.-C. Tsai, D. Ignatova, O. Pavlova, C. Iselin, L. French, M. Levesque, F. Kuonen, M. Bobrowicz, P. Brunner, S. Pascolo, W. Hoetzenecker, E. Guenova","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114356","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114356","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 114356"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142416665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114361
I. Struna, A. Dobre, L.-A. Nurla, A.-M. Forsea
{"title":"A-132 Navigating Modern Challenges in Early Mycosis Fungoides: A Case Report of a Peculiar Association and an Unusual Clinical Presentation","authors":"I. Struna, A. Dobre, L.-A. Nurla, A.-M. Forsea","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114361","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114361","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 114361"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142416702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}