Background
Existing meta-analyses of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration focus mainly on ranibizumab and aflibercept, with limited data on newer agents (faricimab, conbercept). This network meta-analysis (NMA) comprehensively compares all four key agents.
Methods
We systematically searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials. Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted, with evidence certainty assessed using CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis).
Results
Thirty-nine randomized controlled trials involving 11,548 participants were included. For best-corrected visual acuity, agents showed comparable efficacy (high to moderate evidence); differences were neither statistically nor clinically significant. Choroidal neovascularization regression showed no important differences (mostly low certainty evidence). For retinal thickness, superior reductions versus ranibizumab 0.5 mg were observed with aflibercept 2 mg (MD: −14.27, 95 % CrI: −27.25, −1.75; high certainty), aflibercept 8 mg (MD: −32.43, 95 % CrI: −57.40, −7.75; high certainty), and conbercept 0.5 mg (MD: −10.26, 95 % CrI: −19.43, −0.98; moderate certainty). Faricimab required significantly fewer injections (high certainty evidence). Aflibercept 2 mg showed better ocular safety than faricimab 6 mg (OR: 0.58, 95 % CrI: 0.37, 0.90) and ranibizumab 0.5 mg (OR: 0.72, 95 % CrI: 0.53, 0.97; high certainty).
Conclusion
Aflibercept and conbercept may be preferred when anatomical outcomes are prioritized, whereas faricimab's extended dosing interval could benefit treatment-adherent populations. The superior safety profile of aflibercept 2 mg warrants consideration in risk averse patients. These differential effects support personalized therapeutic decision-making.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
