Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-18DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70192
Jessa S Bidwell, Carlos G Vanoye, Reshma R Desai, Anne T Berg, Alfred L George
Objective: Variants in KCNQ2 encoding the voltage-gated potassium channel KV7.2 are associated with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) of varying severity. This study examined the relationship of KCNQ2 variant dysfunction with the neurodevelopmental phenotype of individuals with KCNQ2-DEE.
Methods: A parent-reported survey gathered clinical and genetic data for individuals with KCNQ2-DEE. Several clinical features were analyzed separately and as a composite non-seizure phenotype severity score (PSS) for six features (mobility, communication, hand use, eating, scoliosis, cerebral visual impairment). The effect of variants on KV7.2 channel function was determined by voltage-clamp recording in heterologous cells co-expressing KV7.3. Functional effects were classified as severe loss of function (SLOF), loss of function (LOF), wild-type-like (WTL), and gain of function (GOF).
Results: The study included 48 individuals each heterozygous for one of 38 unique variants. Median seizure-onset age was 1 day. Complete or significant seizure reduction was reported in 7/13 with carbamazepine, 13/17 with oxcarbazepine, 10/13 with phenytoin, and 3/4 with retigabine. The median PSS was 1 (interquartile range 1-3). On the participant level, 29 had SLOF variants, 13 had LOF variants, and the remaining participants had variants with GOF (3) or exhibited WTL (2) function. There were no significant associations of variant function with individual phenotypes in the PSS; however, the PSS itself was higher in those with SLOF versus LOF variants (p = 0.02). Among individuals with SLOF or LOF variants, there was an intriguing lower prevalence of epileptic spasms among individuals with dominant-negative variants.
Significance: Multiple and severe neurodevelopmental impairments are common in KCNQ2-DEE. There was a modest correlation between KV7.2 channel dysfunction and overall non-seizure phenotype severity in this cohort. These findings suggest that factors other than differences in channel dysfunction contribute to variable clinical severity in KCNQ2-DEE.
Plain language summary: We examined how changes in the KCNQ2 gene, which affect the function of a brain potassium channel, relate to developmental and seizure features in children with KCNQ2-related epilepsy. Using parent surveys and lab studies of gene variants, we found that variants causing the channel to lose most of its function were linked to slightly worse overall development. Our results suggest that while channel dysfunction plays a role, other biological or environmental factors likely influence how severely children are affected.
{"title":"Neurodevelopmental features in KCNQ2 developmental and epileptic encephalopathy may have limited associations with K<sub>V</sub>7.2 dysfunction.","authors":"Jessa S Bidwell, Carlos G Vanoye, Reshma R Desai, Anne T Berg, Alfred L George","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70192","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Variants in KCNQ2 encoding the voltage-gated potassium channel K<sub>V</sub>7.2 are associated with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) of varying severity. This study examined the relationship of KCNQ2 variant dysfunction with the neurodevelopmental phenotype of individuals with KCNQ2-DEE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parent-reported survey gathered clinical and genetic data for individuals with KCNQ2-DEE. Several clinical features were analyzed separately and as a composite non-seizure phenotype severity score (PSS) for six features (mobility, communication, hand use, eating, scoliosis, cerebral visual impairment). The effect of variants on K<sub>V</sub>7.2 channel function was determined by voltage-clamp recording in heterologous cells co-expressing K<sub>V</sub>7.3. Functional effects were classified as severe loss of function (SLOF), loss of function (LOF), wild-type-like (WTL), and gain of function (GOF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 48 individuals each heterozygous for one of 38 unique variants. Median seizure-onset age was 1 day. Complete or significant seizure reduction was reported in 7/13 with carbamazepine, 13/17 with oxcarbazepine, 10/13 with phenytoin, and 3/4 with retigabine. The median PSS was 1 (interquartile range 1-3). On the participant level, 29 had SLOF variants, 13 had LOF variants, and the remaining participants had variants with GOF (3) or exhibited WTL (2) function. There were no significant associations of variant function with individual phenotypes in the PSS; however, the PSS itself was higher in those with SLOF versus LOF variants (p = 0.02). Among individuals with SLOF or LOF variants, there was an intriguing lower prevalence of epileptic spasms among individuals with dominant-negative variants.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Multiple and severe neurodevelopmental impairments are common in KCNQ2-DEE. There was a modest correlation between K<sub>V</sub>7.2 channel dysfunction and overall non-seizure phenotype severity in this cohort. These findings suggest that factors other than differences in channel dysfunction contribute to variable clinical severity in KCNQ2-DEE.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>We examined how changes in the KCNQ2 gene, which affect the function of a brain potassium channel, relate to developmental and seizure features in children with KCNQ2-related epilepsy. Using parent surveys and lab studies of gene variants, we found that variants causing the channel to lose most of its function were linked to slightly worse overall development. Our results suggest that while channel dysfunction plays a role, other biological or environmental factors likely influence how severely children are affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"190-199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70179
Byoung Chan Lee, Russell C Dale, Elizabeth H Barnes, Shekeeb S Mohammad, Sachin Gupta, Chong Wong, Deepak Gill, Kavitha Kothur
Objective: To examine the clinical features of new-onset focal seizures in children and investigate clinical associations and predictors of underlying etiology and drug resistance.
Methods: Data were gathered from The Children's Hospital at Westmead admissions for patients aged 1 month to 18 years who presented with new-onset focal seizures between 2018 and 2022 (n = 140). Seizure characteristics, etiology, clinical comorbidities, investigations, and antiseizure medications were analyzed. Clinical associations between etiologies and comorbidities/treatment outcomes were investigated using nonparametric tests and hierarchical cluster analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of drug resistance.
Results: The median age of seizure onset was 4.7 years (IQR 1.9-8.1). The etiologies included unknown (n = 53, 39%) followed by structural (n = 36, 26%), self-limited childhood focal epilepsy (n = 21, 15%), genetic (n = 12, 9%), inflammatory (n = 12, 9%), and metabolic (n = 3, 2%). The explosive seizure-onset seizures (p = 0.04), focal neurological abnormalities (p = 0.04), younger age at seizure onset (p = 0.01), abnormal neuroimaging findings (p < 0.001), and drug resistance (p < 0.001) were associated with known etiology. Regression analysis showed the drug resistance risk increased with the presence of known genetic (OR 6.7; 95% CI 1.6-31.8), structural (OR 6.4; 95% CI 2.3-19.5), and inflammatory (OR 4.6; 95% CI 1.0-21.2) etiologies.
Significance: Our study examines the important associations and predictors of etiology and drug resistance in children with new-onset focal seizures. The significance of known etiologies as risk factors for drug resistance promotes the need for improved monitoring and etiology-driven treatment.
Plain language summary: This study looked at children who had focal seizures for the first time. In many cases, the cause was unknown, but a large portion was linked to structural brain changes, childhood epilepsies that usually resolve, or genetic, inflammatory, and metabolic conditions. Children with a known cause, especially genetic, structural, or inflammatory, were more likely to have seizures that did not improve with anti-seizure medications. Identifying the cause early can help doctors choose better treatments and provide closer monitoring for patients.
{"title":"Predictors of etiology and drug resistance in children with new-onset focal seizures.","authors":"Byoung Chan Lee, Russell C Dale, Elizabeth H Barnes, Shekeeb S Mohammad, Sachin Gupta, Chong Wong, Deepak Gill, Kavitha Kothur","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70179","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70179","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the clinical features of new-onset focal seizures in children and investigate clinical associations and predictors of underlying etiology and drug resistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were gathered from The Children's Hospital at Westmead admissions for patients aged 1 month to 18 years who presented with new-onset focal seizures between 2018 and 2022 (n = 140). Seizure characteristics, etiology, clinical comorbidities, investigations, and antiseizure medications were analyzed. Clinical associations between etiologies and comorbidities/treatment outcomes were investigated using nonparametric tests and hierarchical cluster analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of drug resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of seizure onset was 4.7 years (IQR 1.9-8.1). The etiologies included unknown (n = 53, 39%) followed by structural (n = 36, 26%), self-limited childhood focal epilepsy (n = 21, 15%), genetic (n = 12, 9%), inflammatory (n = 12, 9%), and metabolic (n = 3, 2%). The explosive seizure-onset seizures (p = 0.04), focal neurological abnormalities (p = 0.04), younger age at seizure onset (p = 0.01), abnormal neuroimaging findings (p < 0.001), and drug resistance (p < 0.001) were associated with known etiology. Regression analysis showed the drug resistance risk increased with the presence of known genetic (OR 6.7; 95% CI 1.6-31.8), structural (OR 6.4; 95% CI 2.3-19.5), and inflammatory (OR 4.6; 95% CI 1.0-21.2) etiologies.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our study examines the important associations and predictors of etiology and drug resistance in children with new-onset focal seizures. The significance of known etiologies as risk factors for drug resistance promotes the need for improved monitoring and etiology-driven treatment.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study looked at children who had focal seizures for the first time. In many cases, the cause was unknown, but a large portion was linked to structural brain changes, childhood epilepsies that usually resolve, or genetic, inflammatory, and metabolic conditions. Children with a known cause, especially genetic, structural, or inflammatory, were more likely to have seizures that did not improve with anti-seizure medications. Identifying the cause early can help doctors choose better treatments and provide closer monitoring for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"123-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency requiring immediate treatment. Although intravenous lacosamide (LCM) is used for the management of epilepsy, its effectiveness in treating SE remains unclear. We aimed to compare the in-hospital outcomes between intravenous LCM and levetiracetam (LEV) as an early adjunctive therapy for SE using a nationwide inpatient Japanese database.
Methods: We conducted an observational study using data extracted from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Patients admitted for SE who received intravenous diazepam or lorazepam on the day of admission and were discharged between April 2019 and March 2023 were enrolled. Patients were categorized into those who received intravenous LCM or LEV on the day of admission. We compared the in-hospital outcomes (in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, total hospitalization costs, and proportion of patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score [GCS] ≤9 at discharge) between the groups using propensity score overlap weighting.
Results: Among the 4605 eligible patients, 227 received LCM and 4378 received LEV. In the propensity score overlap-weighted cohort, in-hospital mortality (4.0% vs. 4.6%, adjusted risk difference [aRD], -0.28%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.3% to 2.7%), length of hospital stay (22.4 vs. 22.3 days; difference, 0.011; 95% CI, -3.9 to 3.9), and total hospitalization costs (1 167 798 JPY vs. 1 177 497 JPY; difference, 9699 JPY; 95% CI, -196 269 to 176 872 JPY) did not differ significantly between the LCM and LEV groups. The proportion of patients with GCS scores ≤9 at discharge was lower in the LCM group than in the LEV group (0.6% and 2.4%; aRD, -2.1%; 95% CI, -3.3% to -0.9%).
Significance: LCM and LEV did not yield significantly different in-hospital mortality rates when used for early adjunctive treatment of SE. However, LCM may reduce poor neurological status at discharge. These results highlight the potential utility of LCM in the early management of SE.
Plain language summary: This study compared two intravenous antiseizure medications, levetiracetam (LEV) and lacosamide (LCM), as early add-on therapy for status epilepticus (SE), using data from a large Japanese inpatient database. The in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, or total medical costs did not differ significantly between the groups. However, patients treated with LCM had a lower chance of having a poor neurological status at discharge. While LEV is a well-established treatment for SE, this study suggests that LCM may be similarly effective and could offer an advantage, although more research is needed.
{"title":"In-hospital outcomes of lacosamide versus levetiracetam for early adjunctive treatment of status epilepticus: A Nationwide Japanese retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yumiko Nakamura, Shotaro Aso, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Yuichiro Shirota, Masashi Hamada, Kiyohide Fushimi, Tatsushi Toda, Satoshi Kodama","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70182","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency requiring immediate treatment. Although intravenous lacosamide (LCM) is used for the management of epilepsy, its effectiveness in treating SE remains unclear. We aimed to compare the in-hospital outcomes between intravenous LCM and levetiracetam (LEV) as an early adjunctive therapy for SE using a nationwide inpatient Japanese database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational study using data extracted from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Patients admitted for SE who received intravenous diazepam or lorazepam on the day of admission and were discharged between April 2019 and March 2023 were enrolled. Patients were categorized into those who received intravenous LCM or LEV on the day of admission. We compared the in-hospital outcomes (in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, total hospitalization costs, and proportion of patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score [GCS] ≤9 at discharge) between the groups using propensity score overlap weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 4605 eligible patients, 227 received LCM and 4378 received LEV. In the propensity score overlap-weighted cohort, in-hospital mortality (4.0% vs. 4.6%, adjusted risk difference [aRD], -0.28%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.3% to 2.7%), length of hospital stay (22.4 vs. 22.3 days; difference, 0.011; 95% CI, -3.9 to 3.9), and total hospitalization costs (1 167 798 JPY vs. 1 177 497 JPY; difference, 9699 JPY; 95% CI, -196 269 to 176 872 JPY) did not differ significantly between the LCM and LEV groups. The proportion of patients with GCS scores ≤9 at discharge was lower in the LCM group than in the LEV group (0.6% and 2.4%; aRD, -2.1%; 95% CI, -3.3% to -0.9%).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>LCM and LEV did not yield significantly different in-hospital mortality rates when used for early adjunctive treatment of SE. However, LCM may reduce poor neurological status at discharge. These results highlight the potential utility of LCM in the early management of SE.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study compared two intravenous antiseizure medications, levetiracetam (LEV) and lacosamide (LCM), as early add-on therapy for status epilepticus (SE), using data from a large Japanese inpatient database. The in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, or total medical costs did not differ significantly between the groups. However, patients treated with LCM had a lower chance of having a poor neurological status at discharge. While LEV is a well-established treatment for SE, this study suggests that LCM may be similarly effective and could offer an advantage, although more research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"162-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145494086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-22DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70205
Tamara Lisy, Johannes Peter Koren, Christina Duarte, Clemens Lang, Susanne Pirker, Matthias Tomschik, Karl Rössler, Christoph Baumgartner
Accurate seizure documentation is essential in guiding treatment decisions in epilepsy but still heavily relies on highly subjective and sometimes unreliable patient reports. We report a case of medically refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy where subcutaneous EEG revealed persistence of seizures following add-on antiseizure medication despite the patient's self-report of seizure freedom. Thus, ultralong-term EEG subcutaneous monitoring provided valuable information on medical refractoriness and supported the decision to proceed to surgical intervention. Subcutaneous EEG monitoring was continued after resective surgery and has shown no further seizures to this date. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case utilizing subcutaneous EEG for objective seizure documentation both pre- and post-surgery. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Making the right treatment decisions depends on knowing the seizure frequency of a person with epilepsy, but patients' reports are often inaccurate. In our case, we describe a patient in which seizures were only detected because of a small electrode implanted under the skin to record brain activity (subcutaneous EEG). Based on this information, the patient received brain surgery, and the device was left in place after surgery, showing no further seizures. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case where this type of EEG device was used to track seizures both before and after epilepsy surgery.
{"title":"Objective outcome assessment in epilepsy surgery using ultralong-term subcutaneous EEG: A case report.","authors":"Tamara Lisy, Johannes Peter Koren, Christina Duarte, Clemens Lang, Susanne Pirker, Matthias Tomschik, Karl Rössler, Christoph Baumgartner","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70205","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70205","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate seizure documentation is essential in guiding treatment decisions in epilepsy but still heavily relies on highly subjective and sometimes unreliable patient reports. We report a case of medically refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy where subcutaneous EEG revealed persistence of seizures following add-on antiseizure medication despite the patient's self-report of seizure freedom. Thus, ultralong-term EEG subcutaneous monitoring provided valuable information on medical refractoriness and supported the decision to proceed to surgical intervention. Subcutaneous EEG monitoring was continued after resective surgery and has shown no further seizures to this date. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case utilizing subcutaneous EEG for objective seizure documentation both pre- and post-surgery. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Making the right treatment decisions depends on knowing the seizure frequency of a person with epilepsy, but patients' reports are often inaccurate. In our case, we describe a patient in which seizures were only detected because of a small electrode implanted under the skin to record brain activity (subcutaneous EEG). Based on this information, the patient received brain surgery, and the device was left in place after surgery, showing no further seizures. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case where this type of EEG device was used to track seizures both before and after epilepsy surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"340-346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145803515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70202
Jooyoung Lee, Arum Choi, Sukil Kim, Tae-Hoon Eom
Objective: The long-term effects of epilepsy surgery (ES) or vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on antiseizure medication (ASM) usage and status epilepticus (SE) diagnosis in real-world pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) populations remain unclear. This study aimed to provide a more comprehensive understanding of how VNS and ES affect ASM usage and SE manifestations in pediatric DRE.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide, retrospective cohort study using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2022. Pediatric patients (<18 years) diagnosed with DRE were categorized into ASM-only, VNS, and ES groups. Changes in ASM usage and SE diagnostic rates were assessed.
Results: A total of 6075 pediatric patients with DRE were included (ASM-only, n = 5407; VNS, n = 217; ES, n = 451). Although the VNS and ES groups had more severe epilepsy at baseline, both interventions significantly reduced ASM usage, albeit with distinct trajectories. ES led to a sharp reduction in ASM usage immediately postoperatively, followed by stabilization, with approximately one-third of the patients discontinuing ASM by the end of follow-up. VNS stabilized ASM usage rather than reducing it, with fewer than 10% of patients discontinuing ASM. Both interventions were associated with significant decreases in SE diagnostic rates after the intervention (p = 0.007 and 0.02, respectively), but no statistically significant difference was found in the overall SE rates among the three groups (p = 0.18).
Significance: These findings demonstrate that VNS and CES positively impact ASM usage, reduce the incidence of SE, and underscore the need for timely intervention to optimize outcomes.
Plain language summary: We studied children with drug-resistant epilepsy who were treated with either vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or brain surgery for epilepsy. We found that brain surgery often led to a large and lasting reduction in seizure medication, whereas VNS helped stabilize medication use. Both treatments were linked to fewer cases of status epilepticus, a severe type of seizure emergency. These findings suggest that VNS and surgery may help reduce medication burden and protect against serious seizures in children with hard-to-treat epilepsy.
目的:癫痫手术(ES)或迷走神经刺激(VNS)对现实世界儿童耐药癫痫(DRE)人群抗癫痫药物(ASM)使用和癫痫持续状态(SE)诊断的长期影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在更全面地了解VNS和ES如何影响儿童DRE的ASM使用和SE表现。方法:从2007年1月1日至2022年12月31日,我们使用韩国健康保险审查和评估服务数据库进行了一项全国性的回顾性队列研究。结果:共纳入6075例DRE患儿(仅asm, n = 5407; VNS, n = 217; ES, n = 451)。虽然VNS组和ES组在基线时有更严重的癫痫,但两种干预措施都显著减少了ASM的使用,尽管有不同的轨迹。ES导致术后ASM使用立即急剧减少,随后稳定,大约三分之一的患者在随访结束时停止ASM。VNS稳定了ASM的使用,而不是减少,只有不到10%的患者停止使用ASM。两组干预后SE诊断率均显著降低(p = 0.007和0.02),但三组间SE总诊断率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.18)。意义:这些发现表明VNS和CES积极影响ASM的使用,降低SE的发生率,并强调及时干预以优化结果的必要性。摘要:我们研究了用迷走神经刺激(VNS)或脑外科手术治疗癫痫的耐药癫痫患儿。我们发现脑外科手术通常会导致癫痫药物的大量持续减少,而VNS则有助于稳定药物的使用。两种治疗方法都能减少癫痫持续状态(一种严重的癫痫发作紧急情况)的病例。这些发现表明,VNS和手术可能有助于减轻药物负担,并防止患有难以治疗的癫痫的儿童严重发作。
{"title":"Effects of vagus nerve stimulation and epilepsy surgery on antiseizure medication usage in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in the real world: A retrospective nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Jooyoung Lee, Arum Choi, Sukil Kim, Tae-Hoon Eom","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70202","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The long-term effects of epilepsy surgery (ES) or vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on antiseizure medication (ASM) usage and status epilepticus (SE) diagnosis in real-world pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) populations remain unclear. This study aimed to provide a more comprehensive understanding of how VNS and ES affect ASM usage and SE manifestations in pediatric DRE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide, retrospective cohort study using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2022. Pediatric patients (<18 years) diagnosed with DRE were categorized into ASM-only, VNS, and ES groups. Changes in ASM usage and SE diagnostic rates were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6075 pediatric patients with DRE were included (ASM-only, n = 5407; VNS, n = 217; ES, n = 451). Although the VNS and ES groups had more severe epilepsy at baseline, both interventions significantly reduced ASM usage, albeit with distinct trajectories. ES led to a sharp reduction in ASM usage immediately postoperatively, followed by stabilization, with approximately one-third of the patients discontinuing ASM by the end of follow-up. VNS stabilized ASM usage rather than reducing it, with fewer than 10% of patients discontinuing ASM. Both interventions were associated with significant decreases in SE diagnostic rates after the intervention (p = 0.007 and 0.02, respectively), but no statistically significant difference was found in the overall SE rates among the three groups (p = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>These findings demonstrate that VNS and CES positively impact ASM usage, reduce the incidence of SE, and underscore the need for timely intervention to optimize outcomes.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>We studied children with drug-resistant epilepsy who were treated with either vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or brain surgery for epilepsy. We found that brain surgery often led to a large and lasting reduction in seizure medication, whereas VNS helped stabilize medication use. Both treatments were linked to fewer cases of status epilepticus, a severe type of seizure emergency. These findings suggest that VNS and surgery may help reduce medication burden and protect against serious seizures in children with hard-to-treat epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"240-249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145793674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-30DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70191
Elaine Wirrell, James Wheless, Michael Scott Perry, Linda Laux, Karen C Keough, Julie Ziobro, Aimee F Luat, Gewalin Aungaroon, Michael A Ciliberto, Roxane Noel, Laurent Chancharme, Joseph Sullivan
Objective: Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with a high seizure burden and mortality risk. Stiripentol, one of the first DS-specific therapies, received FDA approval in 2018 but its real-world use and impact post-approval in the USA remain insufficiently characterized. The STIRUS study aimed to assess treatment patterns, clinical efficacy, and quality of life outcomes associated with stiripentol in a contemporary US cohort.
Methods: STIRUS was a retrospective, multicenter chart review of 98 DS patients who initiated stiripentol after FDA approval and were treated for at least 3 months. Data were collected from 10 USA epilepsy centers on seizure types and frequency, status epilepticus (SE), rescue medication use, emergency room visits, and quality of life, at baseline and during the first and final 3 months on stiripentol. Changes over time were assessed using generalized estimating equation models.
Results: Initiation of stiripentol was associated with a significant reduction in bilateral convulsive seizure frequency (OR = 2.16, p < 0.006) and a nearly 50% decrease in SE episodes (OR = 2.9, p < 0.003). Importantly, there was a marked decline in rescue medication use and seizure-related hospital visits: the proportion of patients requiring no rescue medications increased from 23% to over 53%, and those needing frequent emergency interventions dropped from 39% at baseline to 14% during the final 3 months. Quality of life improved in more than half of patients and caregivers.
Significance: The STIRUS study supports the real-world efficacy of stiripentol in reducing seizure burden and healthcare utilization in DS. Despite its demonstrated benefits and approval for use in infants, stiripentol remains underutilized and often introduced late in the treatment course. Early and broader adoption may help improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in this vulnerable population.
Plain language summary: The STIRUS study found that stiripentol, an anti-seizure medication specifically approved for Dravet Syndrome, helped reduce seizures and hospital visits for children living with this severe form of epilepsy. Patients had fewer convulsive seizures, needed fewer rescue medicines, and reported better quality of life. Despite these benefits, stiripentol is still not widely used and often started too late in treatment, suggesting earlier use could further improve outcomes.
{"title":"Stiripentol use in Dravet syndrome patients in the USA: Results of a real-world study.","authors":"Elaine Wirrell, James Wheless, Michael Scott Perry, Linda Laux, Karen C Keough, Julie Ziobro, Aimee F Luat, Gewalin Aungaroon, Michael A Ciliberto, Roxane Noel, Laurent Chancharme, Joseph Sullivan","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70191","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with a high seizure burden and mortality risk. Stiripentol, one of the first DS-specific therapies, received FDA approval in 2018 but its real-world use and impact post-approval in the USA remain insufficiently characterized. The STIRUS study aimed to assess treatment patterns, clinical efficacy, and quality of life outcomes associated with stiripentol in a contemporary US cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>STIRUS was a retrospective, multicenter chart review of 98 DS patients who initiated stiripentol after FDA approval and were treated for at least 3 months. Data were collected from 10 USA epilepsy centers on seizure types and frequency, status epilepticus (SE), rescue medication use, emergency room visits, and quality of life, at baseline and during the first and final 3 months on stiripentol. Changes over time were assessed using generalized estimating equation models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initiation of stiripentol was associated with a significant reduction in bilateral convulsive seizure frequency (OR = 2.16, p < 0.006) and a nearly 50% decrease in SE episodes (OR = 2.9, p < 0.003). Importantly, there was a marked decline in rescue medication use and seizure-related hospital visits: the proportion of patients requiring no rescue medications increased from 23% to over 53%, and those needing frequent emergency interventions dropped from 39% at baseline to 14% during the final 3 months. Quality of life improved in more than half of patients and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The STIRUS study supports the real-world efficacy of stiripentol in reducing seizure burden and healthcare utilization in DS. Despite its demonstrated benefits and approval for use in infants, stiripentol remains underutilized and often introduced late in the treatment course. Early and broader adoption may help improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in this vulnerable population.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>The STIRUS study found that stiripentol, an anti-seizure medication specifically approved for Dravet Syndrome, helped reduce seizures and hospital visits for children living with this severe form of epilepsy. Patients had fewer convulsive seizures, needed fewer rescue medicines, and reported better quality of life. Despite these benefits, stiripentol is still not widely used and often started too late in treatment, suggesting earlier use could further improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"200-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145647834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-13DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70181
Marian Michael Bercu, Bahram Sarvi Zargar, Kathryn E Spykman, Gabe Heredia, Alon Y Mogilner, Angel W Hernandez, Sanjay E Patra, David E Burdette, Paul Ferrari
The management of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in the pediatric population using neurostimulation of the centromedian (CM) nucleus of the thalamus (CMN) has been reported to be effective and safe. We present a case series of pediatric patients treated with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and report on contact localization in relation to preliminary outcomes, specifically seizure reduction rates. Thirteen pediatric patients treated with RNS underwent direct targeting of the CMN based on Magnetization-Prepared 2 Rapid Gradient-Echo (MP2RAGE) scans, using ClearPoint neuronavigation. The implanted electrodes were co-registered to a probabilistic anatomical model of the thalamic nuclei (Freesurfer) for secondary confirmation of contact localization. Ten out of the 12 patients with extra-temporal multifocal or generalized DRE (83.3%) had over 50% reduction in seizures, benefiting from an 80.4% seizure reduction rate. The average follow-up interval was 25.2 months, with no patients experiencing stimulation-related side effects. The analysis of post-operative images revealed that out of the 24 CM-processed electrodes, 23 (95.8%) had at least two contacts in the nucleus, based on patient-specific segmentation of the thalamus. The preliminary outcomes suggest a robust response to central neurostimulation and no stimulation-related side effects in pediatric patients suffering from multifocal or generalized DRE when implementing high-accuracy direct targeting. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We are reporting our experience in the management of the most challenging types of pediatric epilepsy, involving seizures originating from multiple and/or poorly defined brain areas. We surgically implanted a responsive neurostimulation device (RNS) in central areas of the brain that function as connection hubs between different brain regions. These devices are designed to detect early signs of abnormal brain activity, and respond with electrical pulses to prevent progression to clinical seizures. Using our approach, we reduced the seizure rates by an average of 80% in 83% of the pediatric patients who received this treatment.
{"title":"Centromedian nucleus targeting in the pediatric population treated with thalamic responsive neurostimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy.","authors":"Marian Michael Bercu, Bahram Sarvi Zargar, Kathryn E Spykman, Gabe Heredia, Alon Y Mogilner, Angel W Hernandez, Sanjay E Patra, David E Burdette, Paul Ferrari","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70181","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in the pediatric population using neurostimulation of the centromedian (CM) nucleus of the thalamus (CMN) has been reported to be effective and safe. We present a case series of pediatric patients treated with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and report on contact localization in relation to preliminary outcomes, specifically seizure reduction rates. Thirteen pediatric patients treated with RNS underwent direct targeting of the CMN based on Magnetization-Prepared 2 Rapid Gradient-Echo (MP2RAGE) scans, using ClearPoint neuronavigation. The implanted electrodes were co-registered to a probabilistic anatomical model of the thalamic nuclei (Freesurfer) for secondary confirmation of contact localization. Ten out of the 12 patients with extra-temporal multifocal or generalized DRE (83.3%) had over 50% reduction in seizures, benefiting from an 80.4% seizure reduction rate. The average follow-up interval was 25.2 months, with no patients experiencing stimulation-related side effects. The analysis of post-operative images revealed that out of the 24 CM-processed electrodes, 23 (95.8%) had at least two contacts in the nucleus, based on patient-specific segmentation of the thalamus. The preliminary outcomes suggest a robust response to central neurostimulation and no stimulation-related side effects in pediatric patients suffering from multifocal or generalized DRE when implementing high-accuracy direct targeting. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We are reporting our experience in the management of the most challenging types of pediatric epilepsy, involving seizures originating from multiple and/or poorly defined brain areas. We surgically implanted a responsive neurostimulation device (RNS) in central areas of the brain that function as connection hubs between different brain regions. These devices are designed to detect early signs of abnormal brain activity, and respond with electrical pulses to prevent progression to clinical seizures. Using our approach, we reduced the seizure rates by an average of 80% in 83% of the pediatric patients who received this treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"322-331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145502789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-10DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70178
Mustafa S Alhasan, Mohammed Khalil, Ayman S Alhasan, Ahmed Najjar, Yasir Hassan Elhassan, Abdullah Almaghraby, Omar Alharthi, Seham Hamoud, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Fabricio Feltrin, Sumit Singh, James Milburn, Ahmed Y Azzam
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate localization of epileptogenic foci remains of significant importance for surgical planning in drug-resistant epilepsy. Multiple neuroimaging modalities are available; however, their comparative diagnostic performance lacks comparative detailed synthesis. This systematic review aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of structural MRI, PET imaging, SPECT/SISCOM, and combined multimodal strategies for epileptogenic focus localization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to May 30, 2025. Studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of neuroimaging modalities for epilepsy focus localization with surgical correlation were included. Data extraction focused on sensitivity, specificity, and clinical manner. Quality assessment used QUADAS-2 criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies included a total of 1157 patients that met inclusion criteria. Combined multimodal strategies integrating two or more imaging modalities demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (sensitivity 82-100%), followed by structural MRI in lesional epilepsy (72-100% sensitivity). PET imaging showed consistent performance across clinical contexts (33-89% sensitivity), while SPECT/SISCOM exhibited variable results (33-83% sensitivity). Strong complementarity existed between MRI and PET (85% concordance), with context-dependent optimization for lesional versus non-lesional epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Combined multimodal neuroimaging provides superior diagnostic performance for epileptogenic focus localization. Clinical context significantly impacts the modality selection, with MRI prioritized in lesional cases and functional imaging essential for MRI-negative epilepsy. These findings support evidence-based imaging protocols for surgical epilepsy evaluation.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This systematic review evaluated which brain imaging techniques are best for finding the exact location where seizures start in people with drug-resistant epilepsy who need surgery. The researchers analyzed 15 studies involving 1157 patients. They found that using multiple imaging techniques together (combining structural and functional imaging) provides the most accurate results, with success rates of 82-100%. Standard MRI scans work very well (72-100% accuracy) when there is a visible brain abnormality causing seizures. However, for patients whose MRI looks normal, additional functional imaging techniques like PET or SPECT scans are crucial, achieving 63-89% accuracy. The study shows that the best imaging approach depends on the individual patient's situation: MRI should be used first when a brain lesion is suspected, but functional imaging becomes essential when MRI does not show anything abnormal. These findings help doctors choose the rig
目的:准确定位致痫灶对耐药癫痫的手术规划具有重要意义。多种神经成像方式是可用的;然而,他们的比较诊断性能缺乏比较详细的综合。本系统综述旨在评估和比较结构MRI、PET成像、SPECT/SISCOM和联合多模式策略对癫痫灶定位的诊断准确性。方法:我们按照PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价,检索PubMed、Scopus、谷歌Scholar、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库,检索时间截止到2025年5月30日。研究评估癫痫病灶定位的神经影像学方式与手术相关性的诊断性能。数据提取的重点是敏感性、特异性和临床方式。质量评估采用QUADAS-2标准。结果:15项研究共纳入1157例符合纳入标准的患者。结合两种或多种成像方式的联合多模式策略显示出最高的诊断性能(灵敏度为82-100%),其次是病变性癫痫的结构MRI(灵敏度为72-100%)。PET成像在临床环境中表现一致(33-89%的灵敏度),而SPECT/SISCOM表现出不同的结果(33-83%的灵敏度)。MRI和PET之间存在很强的互补性(85%的一致性),对病变性癫痫和非病变性癫痫具有情境依赖性优化。意义:联合多模态神经影像学对致痫灶定位有较好的诊断价值。临床背景对模式选择有显著影响,MRI优先用于病变病例,而功能成像对MRI阴性癫痫至关重要。这些发现支持手术癫痫评估的循证成像方案。简明扼要:本系统综述评估了哪种脑成像技术最适合发现需要手术治疗的耐药癫痫患者癫痫发作的确切位置。研究人员分析了涉及1157名患者的15项研究。他们发现,同时使用多种成像技术(结合结构成像和功能成像)可以提供最准确的结果,成功率为82-100%。当有明显的大脑异常导致癫痫发作时,标准的MRI扫描效果很好(72-100%的准确率)。然而,对于MRI看起来正常的患者,额外的功能成像技术,如PET或SPECT扫描是至关重要的,达到63-89%的准确率。研究表明,最佳的成像方法取决于个体患者的情况:当怀疑有脑损伤时应首先使用MRI,但当MRI未显示任何异常时,功能成像就必不可少了。这些发现有助于医生为每位患者选择正确的影像学检查组合,以改善手术计划和结果。
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of neuroimaging modalities for epileptogenic focus localization: A systematic review.","authors":"Mustafa S Alhasan, Mohammed Khalil, Ayman S Alhasan, Ahmed Najjar, Yasir Hassan Elhassan, Abdullah Almaghraby, Omar Alharthi, Seham Hamoud, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Fabricio Feltrin, Sumit Singh, James Milburn, Ahmed Y Azzam","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70178","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate localization of epileptogenic foci remains of significant importance for surgical planning in drug-resistant epilepsy. Multiple neuroimaging modalities are available; however, their comparative diagnostic performance lacks comparative detailed synthesis. This systematic review aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of structural MRI, PET imaging, SPECT/SISCOM, and combined multimodal strategies for epileptogenic focus localization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to May 30, 2025. Studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of neuroimaging modalities for epilepsy focus localization with surgical correlation were included. Data extraction focused on sensitivity, specificity, and clinical manner. Quality assessment used QUADAS-2 criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies included a total of 1157 patients that met inclusion criteria. Combined multimodal strategies integrating two or more imaging modalities demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (sensitivity 82-100%), followed by structural MRI in lesional epilepsy (72-100% sensitivity). PET imaging showed consistent performance across clinical contexts (33-89% sensitivity), while SPECT/SISCOM exhibited variable results (33-83% sensitivity). Strong complementarity existed between MRI and PET (85% concordance), with context-dependent optimization for lesional versus non-lesional epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Combined multimodal neuroimaging provides superior diagnostic performance for epileptogenic focus localization. Clinical context significantly impacts the modality selection, with MRI prioritized in lesional cases and functional imaging essential for MRI-negative epilepsy. These findings support evidence-based imaging protocols for surgical epilepsy evaluation.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This systematic review evaluated which brain imaging techniques are best for finding the exact location where seizures start in people with drug-resistant epilepsy who need surgery. The researchers analyzed 15 studies involving 1157 patients. They found that using multiple imaging techniques together (combining structural and functional imaging) provides the most accurate results, with success rates of 82-100%. Standard MRI scans work very well (72-100% accuracy) when there is a visible brain abnormality causing seizures. However, for patients whose MRI looks normal, additional functional imaging techniques like PET or SPECT scans are crucial, achieving 63-89% accuracy. The study shows that the best imaging approach depends on the individual patient's situation: MRI should be used first when a brain lesion is suspected, but functional imaging becomes essential when MRI does not show anything abnormal. These findings help doctors choose the rig","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"29-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145488131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-29DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70184
Alice D Lam, Emily L Johnson, Rani A Sarkis, Leah J Blank, Tyler E Gaston, Mouhsin M Shafi, Rodrigo Zepeda, Kyle R Pellerin, Nathalie Jette, Douglas N Greve, Lori B Chibnik, Rebecca E Amariglio, Gad A Marshall, M Brandon Westover
Objective: Late-onset unexplained epilepsy (LoUE), defined as epilepsy onset after age 55 without an obvious cause, is an important risk factor for dementia. Studies have shown that 10%-25% of individuals with LoUE develop dementia within 3-4 years following their first seizure. However, the mechanisms underlying progression from LoUE to dementia remain poorly understood. The goals of the ELUCID study are to identify risk factors associated with the development of cognitive decline and dementia in LoUE and to develop tools to identify patients at a high risk for these outcomes and thereby establish a foundation for dementia prevention strategies in this population.
Methods and analysis: ELUCID is a multi-center prospective longitudinal observational study that will enroll 600 participants aged 55 or older with LoUE across seven U.S. medical centers. Participants will undergo a baseline evaluation that includes a detailed clinical history, cognitive testing, brain MRI, overnight scalp EEG, and blood biomarkers. Participants will be followed at 6-month intervals for up to 5 years, to record cognitive and neurological changes, with the primary outcomes of interest being the development of mild cognitive impairment and/or dementia. This study aims to establish LoUE disease subtypes based on biomarkers, cognitive trajectories, and imaging features and to develop a risk stratification tool for predicting cognitive decline and dementia in patients presenting with LoUE.
Ethics and dissemination: ELUCID has obtained IRB approval (no. 2023P001566, August 2023), with the Mass General Brigham IRB serving as the single IRB of record. All de-identified study data will be made publicly available on completion of the study.
Plain language summary: The ELUCID study is a research project involving several medical centers across the U.S. It will focus on older adults who have recently developed seizures without a clear cause. Participants undergo an initial evaluation that includes questions about their medical history, a brain MRI, an overnight scalp EEG (brain wave study), and a blood draw. They will be followed over time with health questionnaires and yearly tests of memory and thinking. The purpose of the study is to learn what factors increase the risk of dementia in this population and to develop tools to predict which individuals are at the highest risk.
{"title":"Late-onset unexplained epilepsy as a risk factor for cognitive impairment and dementia: Protocol for a multi-center prospective longitudinal observational study (ELUCID).","authors":"Alice D Lam, Emily L Johnson, Rani A Sarkis, Leah J Blank, Tyler E Gaston, Mouhsin M Shafi, Rodrigo Zepeda, Kyle R Pellerin, Nathalie Jette, Douglas N Greve, Lori B Chibnik, Rebecca E Amariglio, Gad A Marshall, M Brandon Westover","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70184","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70184","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Late-onset unexplained epilepsy (LoUE), defined as epilepsy onset after age 55 without an obvious cause, is an important risk factor for dementia. Studies have shown that 10%-25% of individuals with LoUE develop dementia within 3-4 years following their first seizure. However, the mechanisms underlying progression from LoUE to dementia remain poorly understood. The goals of the ELUCID study are to identify risk factors associated with the development of cognitive decline and dementia in LoUE and to develop tools to identify patients at a high risk for these outcomes and thereby establish a foundation for dementia prevention strategies in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>ELUCID is a multi-center prospective longitudinal observational study that will enroll 600 participants aged 55 or older with LoUE across seven U.S. medical centers. Participants will undergo a baseline evaluation that includes a detailed clinical history, cognitive testing, brain MRI, overnight scalp EEG, and blood biomarkers. Participants will be followed at 6-month intervals for up to 5 years, to record cognitive and neurological changes, with the primary outcomes of interest being the development of mild cognitive impairment and/or dementia. This study aims to establish LoUE disease subtypes based on biomarkers, cognitive trajectories, and imaging features and to develop a risk stratification tool for predicting cognitive decline and dementia in patients presenting with LoUE.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>ELUCID has obtained IRB approval (no. 2023P001566, August 2023), with the Mass General Brigham IRB serving as the single IRB of record. All de-identified study data will be made publicly available on completion of the study.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>The ELUCID study is a research project involving several medical centers across the U.S. It will focus on older adults who have recently developed seizures without a clear cause. Participants undergo an initial evaluation that includes questions about their medical history, a brain MRI, an overnight scalp EEG (brain wave study), and a blood draw. They will be followed over time with health questionnaires and yearly tests of memory and thinking. The purpose of the study is to learn what factors increase the risk of dementia in this population and to develop tools to predict which individuals are at the highest risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"363-375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145631475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70180
Sina Sadeghzadeh, David A Purger, Priya Bhanot, Noriah Johnson, Daniel A N Barbosa, Yuhao Huang, Jay J Park, Ethan Schonfeld, Matthew A Abikenari, Bhav Jain, Joshua P Aronson, Cornelia Drees, Tiffany L Fisher, Jason Gerrard, Tyler E Gray, Saadi Ghatan, Kevin Hines, Barbara C Jobst, Ioannis Karakis, Steven G Ojemann, Imran H Quraishi, Ahmed M Raslan, Michael D Sather, Christopher T Skidmore, Jon T Willie, Chengyuan Wu, Ji Yeoun Yoo, Kevin D Graber, Casey H Halpern, Vivek P Buch, Jonathon J Parker
<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pivotal trials have established the effectiveness of the Responsive Neurostimulation System (RNS® System) in treating focal epilepsy. In clinical trials, depth leads were primarily used to treat mesial temporal seizure onsets while cortical strip leads were used to treat neocortical seizure onsets. Here, we systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG)-guided depth leads to provide responsive stimulation to neocortical gray matter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were stratified as strong responders (>median cohort seizure reduction %), weak responders (>0% and ≤median cohort seizure reduction %), and anti-responders (≤0%) based on percent seizure reduction at 1 year post-implant (1-Y). Pre-operative T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and post-operative computed tomography images were merged, and the Euclidean distance between the sEEG epileptic focus (sEEG-EF) and the nearest RNS System depth lead contacts was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 87 depth leads were implanted in 55 patients across neocortical brain regions. The median reduction in clinical seizures improved from 66.7% at 1-Y to 77.5% at long-term follow-up (LTFU: 2.35 ± 0.95 years), with 10 patients (18.2%) achieving complete seizure freedom. Seven patients (12.7%) experienced six serious adverse events. At 1-Y, shorter Euclidean distance between the sEEG-EF and RNS System depth leads predicted improved seizure outcome in strong responders (β = -0.84, p = 0.008) but not in weak responders (β = 0.21, p = 0.9) or anti-responders (β = -20.34, p = 0.11). At LTFU, there was no significant relationship between Euclidean distance and seizure reduction in strong responders (β = 0.77, p = 0.18), weak responders (β = 2.05, p = 0.54), or anti-responders (β = 0.24, p = 0.99). Exploratory analyses at 1-Y showed nominal associations between older age (ρ = 0.32), longer epilepsy duration (ρ = 0.27), and non-mesial temporal sEEG-EFs and greater seizure reduction; however, none survived Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = 0.0027; all post-correction p > 0.0027), and no associations were observed at LTFU.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>In this series, neocortical depth leads for RNS therapy had favorable safety and efficacy and proximity to the sEEG-EF drove initial outcomes for strong responders to RNS therapy.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>In this multi-center study, patients with difficult-to-treat seizures received brain-responsive stimulation using a device called responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which delivers small electrical pulses to reduce seizures. We focused on patients treated with electrodes placed in the brain's outer regions (the neocortex) and guided by a mapping procedure called sEEG. On average, patients had their seizures cut by two-thirds after one year and by more than three-quarters with longer follow-up, with about one in five becoming seizure-fre
目的:关键试验已经确立了反应性神经刺激系统(RNS®系统)治疗局灶性癫痫的有效性。在临床试验中,深度导联主要用于治疗内侧颞叶癫痫发作,而皮质条导联则用于治疗新皮层癫痫发作。在这里,我们系统地分析了立体脑电图(sEEG)引导的深度引线对新皮质灰质提供响应性刺激的安全性和有效性。方法:根据植入后1年(1- y)癫痫发作减少百分比,将患者分层为强应答者(>中位队列癫痫发作减少%)、弱应答者(>0%且≤中位队列癫痫发作减少%)和抗应答者(≤0%)。合并术前t1加权磁共振成像和术后ct图像,计算sEEG癫痫病灶(sEEG- ef)与最近RNS系统深度导联接触点之间的欧氏距离。结果:在55例患者中共植入了87根深度导线。临床癫痫发作的中位减少率从1-Y时的66.7%提高到长期随访时的77.5% (LTFU: 2.35±0.95年),10例患者(18.2%)实现了完全的癫痫发作自由。7例患者(12.7%)出现6次严重不良事件。在1-Y时,较短的sEEG-EF和RNS系统深度导联之间的欧氏距离预示着强反应者(β = -0.84, p = 0.008)癫痫发作结果的改善,但在弱反应者(β = 0.21, p = 0.9)或抗反应者(β = -20.34, p = 0.11)中则没有改善。在LTFU时,强反应者(β = 0.77, p = 0.18)、弱反应者(β = 2.05, p = 0.54)或抗反应者(β = 0.24, p = 0.99)的欧氏距离与癫痫发作减少无显著关系。1-Y的探索性分析显示,年龄越大(ρ = 0.32)、癫痫持续时间越长(ρ = 0.27)、非内侧颞叶sEEG-EFs与癫痫发作减少程度越高之间存在名义上的关联;然而,Bonferroni校正后没有存活(校正后α = 0.0027;校正后p = 0.0027), LTFU未观察到相关。意义:在这一系列研究中,新皮质深度导联用于RNS治疗具有良好的安全性和有效性,并且接近sEEG-EF驱动了RNS治疗强应答者的初始结果。摘要:在这项多中心研究中,患有难治性癫痫发作的患者使用一种称为反应性神经刺激(RNS)的装置接受脑反应性刺激,该装置提供小电脉冲以减少癫痫发作。我们的研究重点是在大脑外部区域(新皮层)放置电极,并通过sEEG绘图程序进行指导的患者。平均而言,患者的癫痫发作在一年后减少了三分之二,在更长时间的随访中减少了四分之三以上,大约五分之一的患者不再癫痫发作。这种治疗是安全的,而且电极放置在离发作源更近的地方有助于解释早期的改善,但不是长期的改善。
{"title":"sEEG-guided responsive neurostimulation to treat neocortical epilepsy: A multicenter retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of depth electrode-mediated neuromodulation.","authors":"Sina Sadeghzadeh, David A Purger, Priya Bhanot, Noriah Johnson, Daniel A N Barbosa, Yuhao Huang, Jay J Park, Ethan Schonfeld, Matthew A Abikenari, Bhav Jain, Joshua P Aronson, Cornelia Drees, Tiffany L Fisher, Jason Gerrard, Tyler E Gray, Saadi Ghatan, Kevin Hines, Barbara C Jobst, Ioannis Karakis, Steven G Ojemann, Imran H Quraishi, Ahmed M Raslan, Michael D Sather, Christopher T Skidmore, Jon T Willie, Chengyuan Wu, Ji Yeoun Yoo, Kevin D Graber, Casey H Halpern, Vivek P Buch, Jonathon J Parker","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70180","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pivotal trials have established the effectiveness of the Responsive Neurostimulation System (RNS® System) in treating focal epilepsy. In clinical trials, depth leads were primarily used to treat mesial temporal seizure onsets while cortical strip leads were used to treat neocortical seizure onsets. Here, we systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG)-guided depth leads to provide responsive stimulation to neocortical gray matter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were stratified as strong responders (>median cohort seizure reduction %), weak responders (>0% and ≤median cohort seizure reduction %), and anti-responders (≤0%) based on percent seizure reduction at 1 year post-implant (1-Y). Pre-operative T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and post-operative computed tomography images were merged, and the Euclidean distance between the sEEG epileptic focus (sEEG-EF) and the nearest RNS System depth lead contacts was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 87 depth leads were implanted in 55 patients across neocortical brain regions. The median reduction in clinical seizures improved from 66.7% at 1-Y to 77.5% at long-term follow-up (LTFU: 2.35 ± 0.95 years), with 10 patients (18.2%) achieving complete seizure freedom. Seven patients (12.7%) experienced six serious adverse events. At 1-Y, shorter Euclidean distance between the sEEG-EF and RNS System depth leads predicted improved seizure outcome in strong responders (β = -0.84, p = 0.008) but not in weak responders (β = 0.21, p = 0.9) or anti-responders (β = -20.34, p = 0.11). At LTFU, there was no significant relationship between Euclidean distance and seizure reduction in strong responders (β = 0.77, p = 0.18), weak responders (β = 2.05, p = 0.54), or anti-responders (β = 0.24, p = 0.99). Exploratory analyses at 1-Y showed nominal associations between older age (ρ = 0.32), longer epilepsy duration (ρ = 0.27), and non-mesial temporal sEEG-EFs and greater seizure reduction; however, none survived Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = 0.0027; all post-correction p > 0.0027), and no associations were observed at LTFU.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>In this series, neocortical depth leads for RNS therapy had favorable safety and efficacy and proximity to the sEEG-EF drove initial outcomes for strong responders to RNS therapy.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>In this multi-center study, patients with difficult-to-treat seizures received brain-responsive stimulation using a device called responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which delivers small electrical pulses to reduce seizures. We focused on patients treated with electrodes placed in the brain's outer regions (the neocortex) and guided by a mapping procedure called sEEG. On average, patients had their seizures cut by two-thirds after one year and by more than three-quarters with longer follow-up, with about one in five becoming seizure-fre","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":"146-161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}