首页 > 最新文献

Epilepsia Open最新文献

英文 中文
Sleep enhances gamma oscillations in the seizure onset zone and broadband activity in the irritative zone of focal cortical dysplasia. 睡眠增强了局灶性皮质发育不良发作区的伽马振荡和刺激区的宽带活动。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70215
Mohammad F Khazali, Nina Schwoon, Armin Brandt, Matthias Dümpelmann, Yiwen Li Hegner, Nicolas Roehri, Dirk-Matthias Altenmüller, Victoria San Antonio-Arce, Peter C Reinacher, Julia M Nakagawa, Soroush Doostkam, Theo Demerath, Horst Urbach, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Marcel Heers
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a leading cause of drug-resistant epilepsy and is associated with sleep-related seizures, yet the underlying electrophysiological mechanisms during different brain states remain poorly understood. We investigated whether fast oscillations (FOs) within the seizure onset zone (SOZ) and irritative zone (IZ) change significantly during sleep compared with wake in FCD patients. We analyzed multiple frequency bands-beta (14-20 Hz), gamma (40-80 Hz), ripple (80-250 Hz), and broadband BGR (14-250 Hz) to provide comprehensive information about sleep-related changes. We hypothesized that sleep-related FO changes would be associated with sleep-related epilepsy, frontal location, or FCD type II.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings from 22 FCD patients undergoing presurgical evaluation between 2010 and 2023, with a mean age of 25.3 ± 12.8 years and a disease duration of 17.7 ± 12.3 years. Using semiautomated detection, we compared FO rates between wake and sleep epochs, focusing on contacts within IZ and SOZ. Distance-based multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was employed for patient-level analysis, accounting for spatial organization and enabling multiband evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 67 ± 28 bipolar iEEG contact pairs per patient revealed distinct sleep-related patterns. In SOZ, gamma oscillations showed significant increases in 10/22 patients (45%), followed by BGR in 7/22 patients (32%). IZ exhibited stronger changes, with BGR and gamma showing significance in 13/22 patients each (59%) with high concordance. Gamma oscillation rates in SOZ increased in patients with confirmed sleep-related epilepsy (p < 0.05), while no associations were found with frontal location or FCD type II.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Gamma oscillations showed robust sleep-related increases in SOZ, while gamma and BGR frequencies demonstrated strong changes in IZ, often occurring simultaneously. These findings suggest gamma oscillations, complemented by BGR analysis, may qualify as markers for characterizing sleep-related changes in FCD patients, potentially advancing understanding of mechanisms underlying sleep-related seizures.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a brain malformation that causes difficult-to-treat epilepsy, with patients experiencing seizures mainly during sleep. We studied electrical brain waves in 22 FCD patients using electrodes placed directly within or on the brain during pre-surgery evaluation. We compared brain wave activity between wake and sleep, focusing on fast brain waves. We found that fast brain waves, especially gamma waves, increased significantly during sleep in brain areas where seizures start, particularly in patients whose seizures occur mainly during sleep. These findings potentially help us better understand why seizures happen more often during sleep
目的:局灶性皮质发育不良(FCD)是耐药癫痫的主要原因,与睡眠相关癫痫发作有关,但不同脑状态下潜在的电生理机制尚不清楚。我们研究了FCD患者在睡眠期间与清醒时相比,癫痫发作区(SOZ)和刺激区(IZ)内的快速振荡(FOs)是否有显著变化。我们分析了多个频段- β (14-20 Hz), γ (40-80 Hz),纹波(80-250 Hz)和宽带BGR (14-250 Hz),以提供有关睡眠相关变化的全面信息。我们假设睡眠相关的前脑区变化可能与睡眠相关癫痫、额叶定位或FCD II型有关。方法:对2010 - 2023年间接受术前评估的22例FCD患者的颅内脑电图(iEEG)进行分析,这些患者的平均年龄为25.3±12.8岁,病程为17.7±12.3年。使用半自动检测,我们比较了清醒和睡眠时期的FO率,重点关注IZ和SOZ内的接触。采用基于距离的多变量方差分析(MANOVA)进行患者水平分析,考虑空间组织并实现多波段评估。结果:对每例患者67±28对双相脑电图的分析显示出明显的睡眠相关模式。在SOZ中,10/22例患者(45%)的伽马振荡显著增加,其次是7/22例患者(32%)的BGR。IZ表现出更强的变化,BGR和gamma在13/22(59%)患者中均有显著性变化,一致性高。在确诊为睡眠相关性癫痫的患者中,SOZ的伽马振荡率增加(p)。意义:在SOZ中,伽马振荡显示出与睡眠相关的强劲增加,而在IZ中,伽马和BGR频率显示出强烈的变化,通常同时发生。这些发现表明,伽玛振荡,辅以BGR分析,可能有条件作为表征FCD患者睡眠相关变化的标记,有可能促进对睡眠相关癫痫发作机制的理解。摘要:局灶性皮质发育不良(FCD)是一种脑部畸形,可导致难以治疗的癫痫,患者主要在睡眠期间发作。我们在术前评估中使用电极直接放置在脑内或脑上,研究了22例FCD患者的脑电波。我们比较了清醒和睡眠时的脑电波活动,重点是快速脑电波。我们发现,快速脑电波,尤其是伽马波,在睡眠期间癫痫发作的大脑区域显著增加,特别是在癫痫主要发生在睡眠期间的患者中。这些发现可能有助于我们更好地理解为什么FCD患者在睡眠期间癫痫发作更频繁。
{"title":"Sleep enhances gamma oscillations in the seizure onset zone and broadband activity in the irritative zone of focal cortical dysplasia.","authors":"Mohammad F Khazali, Nina Schwoon, Armin Brandt, Matthias Dümpelmann, Yiwen Li Hegner, Nicolas Roehri, Dirk-Matthias Altenmüller, Victoria San Antonio-Arce, Peter C Reinacher, Julia M Nakagawa, Soroush Doostkam, Theo Demerath, Horst Urbach, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Marcel Heers","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70215","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70215","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a leading cause of drug-resistant epilepsy and is associated with sleep-related seizures, yet the underlying electrophysiological mechanisms during different brain states remain poorly understood. We investigated whether fast oscillations (FOs) within the seizure onset zone (SOZ) and irritative zone (IZ) change significantly during sleep compared with wake in FCD patients. We analyzed multiple frequency bands-beta (14-20 Hz), gamma (40-80 Hz), ripple (80-250 Hz), and broadband BGR (14-250 Hz) to provide comprehensive information about sleep-related changes. We hypothesized that sleep-related FO changes would be associated with sleep-related epilepsy, frontal location, or FCD type II.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We examined intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings from 22 FCD patients undergoing presurgical evaluation between 2010 and 2023, with a mean age of 25.3 ± 12.8 years and a disease duration of 17.7 ± 12.3 years. Using semiautomated detection, we compared FO rates between wake and sleep epochs, focusing on contacts within IZ and SOZ. Distance-based multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was employed for patient-level analysis, accounting for spatial organization and enabling multiband evaluation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Analysis of 67 ± 28 bipolar iEEG contact pairs per patient revealed distinct sleep-related patterns. In SOZ, gamma oscillations showed significant increases in 10/22 patients (45%), followed by BGR in 7/22 patients (32%). IZ exhibited stronger changes, with BGR and gamma showing significance in 13/22 patients each (59%) with high concordance. Gamma oscillation rates in SOZ increased in patients with confirmed sleep-related epilepsy (p &lt; 0.05), while no associations were found with frontal location or FCD type II.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Significance: &lt;/strong&gt;Gamma oscillations showed robust sleep-related increases in SOZ, while gamma and BGR frequencies demonstrated strong changes in IZ, often occurring simultaneously. These findings suggest gamma oscillations, complemented by BGR analysis, may qualify as markers for characterizing sleep-related changes in FCD patients, potentially advancing understanding of mechanisms underlying sleep-related seizures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Plain language summary: &lt;/strong&gt;Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a brain malformation that causes difficult-to-treat epilepsy, with patients experiencing seizures mainly during sleep. We studied electrical brain waves in 22 FCD patients using electrodes placed directly within or on the brain during pre-surgery evaluation. We compared brain wave activity between wake and sleep, focusing on fast brain waves. We found that fast brain waves, especially gamma waves, increased significantly during sleep in brain areas where seizures start, particularly in patients whose seizures occur mainly during sleep. These findings potentially help us better understand why seizures happen more often during sleep","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of etiology and drug resistance in children with new-onset focal seizures 儿童新发局灶性癫痫的病因和耐药性预测因素。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70179
Byoung Chan Lee, Russell C. Dale, Elizabeth H. Barnes, Shekeeb S. Mohammad, Sachin Gupta, Chong Wong, Deepak Gill, Kavitha Kothur
<div> <section> <h3> Objective</h3> <p>To examine the clinical features of new-onset focal seizures in children and investigate clinical associations and predictors of underlying etiology and drug resistance.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Data were gathered from The Children's Hospital at Westmead admissions for patients aged 1 month to 18 years who presented with new-onset focal seizures between 2018 and 2022 (<i>n</i> = 140). Seizure characteristics, etiology, clinical comorbidities, investigations, and antiseizure medications were analyzed. Clinical associations between etiologies and comorbidities/treatment outcomes were investigated using nonparametric tests and hierarchical cluster analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of drug resistance.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>The median age of seizure onset was 4.7 years (IQR 1.9–8.1). The etiologies included unknown (<i>n</i> = 53, 39%) followed by structural (<i>n</i> = 36, 26%), self-limited childhood focal epilepsy (<i>n</i> = 21, 15%), genetic (<i>n</i> = 12, 9%), inflammatory (<i>n</i> = 12, 9%), and metabolic (<i>n</i> = 3, 2%). The explosive seizure-onset seizures (<i>p</i> = 0.04), focal neurological abnormalities (<i>p</i> = 0.04), younger age at seizure onset (<i>p</i> = 0.01), abnormal neuroimaging findings (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and drug resistance (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were associated with known etiology. Regression analysis showed the drug resistance risk increased with the presence of known genetic (OR 6.7; 95% CI 1.6–31.8), structural (OR 6.4; 95% CI 2.3–19.5), and inflammatory (OR 4.6; 95% CI 1.0–21.2) etiologies.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Significance</h3> <p>Our study examines the important associations and predictors of etiology and drug resistance in children with new-onset focal seizures. The significance of known etiologies as risk factors for drug resistance promotes the need for improved monitoring and etiology-driven treatment.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3> <p>This study looked at children who had focal seizures for the first time. In many cases, the cause was unknown, but a large portion was linked to structural brain changes, childhood epilepsies that usually resolve, or genetic, inflammatory, and metabolic conditions. Children with a known cause, especially genetic, structural, or inflammatory, were more likely to have seizures that did not improve with anti-seizure
目的:探讨儿童新发局灶性癫痫的临床特点,探讨病因和耐药性的临床关系及预测因素。方法:收集儿童医院在2018年至2022年期间入院的1个月至18岁的新发局灶性癫痫患者的数据(n = 140)。分析癫痫发作特征、病因、临床合并症、调查和抗癫痫药物。病因与合并症/治疗结果之间的临床关联采用非参数检验和分层聚类分析。采用多变量logistic回归确定耐药预测因素。结果:癫痫发作的中位年龄为4.7岁(IQR为1.9 ~ 8.1)。病因包括未知(n = 53,39%),其次是结构性(n = 36,26%)、自限性儿童局灶性癫痫(n = 21,15%)、遗传性(n = 12,9%)、炎症性(n = 12,9%)和代谢性(n = 3,2%)。爆发性癫痫发作(p = 0.04)、局灶性神经异常(p = 0.04)、发病年龄更小(p = 0.01)、神经影像学异常(p)。意义:本研究探讨了儿童新发局灶性癫痫的病因和耐药性的重要关联及预测因素。已知病因作为耐药危险因素的重要性促进了改进监测和病因驱动治疗的需要。简单的语言总结:这项研究首次观察了有局灶性癫痫发作的儿童。在许多病例中,病因不明,但很大一部分与大脑结构变化、儿童癫痫(通常会消退)或遗传、炎症和代谢状况有关。有已知病因的儿童,特别是遗传、结构或炎症,更有可能癫痫发作,抗癫痫药物治疗效果不佳。及早发现病因可以帮助医生选择更好的治疗方法,并为患者提供更密切的监测。
{"title":"Predictors of etiology and drug resistance in children with new-onset focal seizures","authors":"Byoung Chan Lee,&nbsp;Russell C. Dale,&nbsp;Elizabeth H. Barnes,&nbsp;Shekeeb S. Mohammad,&nbsp;Sachin Gupta,&nbsp;Chong Wong,&nbsp;Deepak Gill,&nbsp;Kavitha Kothur","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70179","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70179","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To examine the clinical features of new-onset focal seizures in children and investigate clinical associations and predictors of underlying etiology and drug resistance.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Data were gathered from The Children's Hospital at Westmead admissions for patients aged 1 month to 18 years who presented with new-onset focal seizures between 2018 and 2022 (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 140). Seizure characteristics, etiology, clinical comorbidities, investigations, and antiseizure medications were analyzed. Clinical associations between etiologies and comorbidities/treatment outcomes were investigated using nonparametric tests and hierarchical cluster analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of drug resistance.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The median age of seizure onset was 4.7 years (IQR 1.9–8.1). The etiologies included unknown (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 53, 39%) followed by structural (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 36, 26%), self-limited childhood focal epilepsy (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 21, 15%), genetic (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 12, 9%), inflammatory (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 12, 9%), and metabolic (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 3, 2%). The explosive seizure-onset seizures (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.04), focal neurological abnormalities (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.04), younger age at seizure onset (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.01), abnormal neuroimaging findings (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001), and drug resistance (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001) were associated with known etiology. Regression analysis showed the drug resistance risk increased with the presence of known genetic (OR 6.7; 95% CI 1.6–31.8), structural (OR 6.4; 95% CI 2.3–19.5), and inflammatory (OR 4.6; 95% CI 1.0–21.2) etiologies.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Significance&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Our study examines the important associations and predictors of etiology and drug resistance in children with new-onset focal seizures. The significance of known etiologies as risk factors for drug resistance promotes the need for improved monitoring and etiology-driven treatment.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Plain Language Summary&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study looked at children who had focal seizures for the first time. In many cases, the cause was unknown, but a large portion was linked to structural brain changes, childhood epilepsies that usually resolve, or genetic, inflammatory, and metabolic conditions. Children with a known cause, especially genetic, structural, or inflammatory, were more likely to have seizures that did not improve with anti-seizure","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"123-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12903812/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Areas of research priorities in epilepsy: A position paper of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies, EpiCARE 癫痫的优先研究领域:欧洲罕见和复杂癫痫参考网络(EpiCARE)的立场文件。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70210
Sébile Tchaicha, Stéphane Auvin, Sándor Beniczky, Andreas Brunklaus, Lieven Lagae, Emilio Perucca, Rainer Surges, Sophie Adler, Christoph Helmstaedter, Floor Jansen, Guido Rubboli, Philippe Ryvlin, Nicola Specchio, Eugen Trinka, Ingmar Blümcke, Valentina de Giorgis, Katarzyna Kotulska, Gaetan Lesca, Masa Malenica, Amy McTague, Rima Nabbout, Rikke Steensbjerre Møller, Sandra Silva Arrieta, Isabella Brambilla, Małgorzata Kosla, Kees Braun, J. Helen Cross, Alexis Arzimanoglou
<div> <section> <h3> Objective</h3> <p>To define and articulate research priorities in epilepsy identified by the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (ERN EpiCARE), addressing key unmet needs across the spectrum of rare and complex epilepsies.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>This position paper was developed through a structured collaborative process involving patient associations and experts from EpiCARE Working Groups, the EpiCARE Executive Committee, and its Research Council. Contributions were integrated and harmonized to establish a shared set of research priorities reflecting clinical, translational, and methodological perspectives.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Six priority areas were identified and examined: prevention of epileptogenesis and disease-modifying challenges; genetics and targeted therapies; improved surgical decision-making; innovative trial designs and outcome measures; artificial intelligence for diagnosis and prediction; understanding and preventing comorbidities and mortality. For each priority, the paper discusses the current state of research, identifies challenges, and proposes strategic directions for future investigations.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Significance</h3> <p>This position paper provides a strategic framework to guide future research efforts, inform prioritization by funders and policymakers, and foster coordinated collaboration across stakeholders. By advancing these priorities, the epilepsy research community aims to improve patient care, reduce health disparities, and develop innovative solutions to address the complexities of epilepsy.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3> <p>This position paper, developed by the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (EpiCARE) in collaboration with its Patient Advocacy Group, defines six areas of research priorities in epilepsy. Each section describes key challenges, current knowledge, and areas for improvement. They focus on preventing epilepsy, developing targeted therapies, improving surgery and clinical trials, using artificial intelligence to support diagnosis, and addressing comorbidities such as cognition, sleep, and overall health. Each provides a roadmap for clinicians and researchers to guide their research projects within their areas of expertise. Collectively, these priorities converge on actions for improving diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes through Eur
目的:定义和阐明由欧洲罕见和复杂癫痫参考网络(ERN EpiCARE)确定的癫痫研究重点,解决罕见和复杂癫痫谱系中关键的未满足需求。方法:本立场文件是通过患者协会和EpiCARE工作组、EpiCARE执行委员会及其研究委员会的专家的结构化协作过程制定的。贡献被整合和协调,以建立一套共享的研究重点,反映临床,转化和方法学的观点。结果:确定并审查了六个优先领域:预防癫痫发生和疾病改变挑战;遗传学和靶向治疗;改善手术决策;创新的试验设计和结果测量;用于诊断和预测的人工智能;了解和预防合并症和死亡率。对于每个优先事项,本文讨论了研究的现状,确定了挑战,并提出了未来调查的战略方向。意义:本立场文件提供了一个战略框架来指导未来的研究工作,为资助者和政策制定者确定优先顺序提供信息,并促进利益相关者之间的协调合作。通过推进这些重点,癫痫研究界旨在改善患者护理,减少健康差距,并制定创新解决方案,以解决癫痫的复杂性。简明扼要:本立场文件由欧洲罕见和复杂癫痫参考网络(EpiCARE)与其患者倡导小组合作制定,确定了癫痫的六个研究重点领域。每一部分都描述了主要的挑战、当前的知识和需要改进的领域。他们专注于预防癫痫、开发靶向治疗、改进手术和临床试验、使用人工智能支持诊断,以及解决认知、睡眠和整体健康等合并症。每个都为临床医生和研究人员提供了一个路线图,以指导他们在其专业领域内的研究项目。总的来说,这些优先事项集中在通过欧洲合作和可持续研究努力改善诊断、治疗和患者预后的行动上。
{"title":"Areas of research priorities in epilepsy: A position paper of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies, EpiCARE","authors":"Sébile Tchaicha,&nbsp;Stéphane Auvin,&nbsp;Sándor Beniczky,&nbsp;Andreas Brunklaus,&nbsp;Lieven Lagae,&nbsp;Emilio Perucca,&nbsp;Rainer Surges,&nbsp;Sophie Adler,&nbsp;Christoph Helmstaedter,&nbsp;Floor Jansen,&nbsp;Guido Rubboli,&nbsp;Philippe Ryvlin,&nbsp;Nicola Specchio,&nbsp;Eugen Trinka,&nbsp;Ingmar Blümcke,&nbsp;Valentina de Giorgis,&nbsp;Katarzyna Kotulska,&nbsp;Gaetan Lesca,&nbsp;Masa Malenica,&nbsp;Amy McTague,&nbsp;Rima Nabbout,&nbsp;Rikke Steensbjerre Møller,&nbsp;Sandra Silva Arrieta,&nbsp;Isabella Brambilla,&nbsp;Małgorzata Kosla,&nbsp;Kees Braun,&nbsp;J. Helen Cross,&nbsp;Alexis Arzimanoglou","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70210","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70210","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To define and articulate research priorities in epilepsy identified by the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (ERN EpiCARE), addressing key unmet needs across the spectrum of rare and complex epilepsies.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This position paper was developed through a structured collaborative process involving patient associations and experts from EpiCARE Working Groups, the EpiCARE Executive Committee, and its Research Council. Contributions were integrated and harmonized to establish a shared set of research priorities reflecting clinical, translational, and methodological perspectives.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Six priority areas were identified and examined: prevention of epileptogenesis and disease-modifying challenges; genetics and targeted therapies; improved surgical decision-making; innovative trial designs and outcome measures; artificial intelligence for diagnosis and prediction; understanding and preventing comorbidities and mortality. For each priority, the paper discusses the current state of research, identifies challenges, and proposes strategic directions for future investigations.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Significance&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This position paper provides a strategic framework to guide future research efforts, inform prioritization by funders and policymakers, and foster coordinated collaboration across stakeholders. By advancing these priorities, the epilepsy research community aims to improve patient care, reduce health disparities, and develop innovative solutions to address the complexities of epilepsy.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Plain Language Summary&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This position paper, developed by the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies (EpiCARE) in collaboration with its Patient Advocacy Group, defines six areas of research priorities in epilepsy. Each section describes key challenges, current knowledge, and areas for improvement. They focus on preventing epilepsy, developing targeted therapies, improving surgery and clinical trials, using artificial intelligence to support diagnosis, and addressing comorbidities such as cognition, sleep, and overall health. Each provides a roadmap for clinicians and researchers to guide their research projects within their areas of expertise. Collectively, these priorities converge on actions for improving diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes through Eur","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"291-321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12903829/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145899558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of Perampanel and Levetiracetam as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures: A single-center, ambispective, open-label, real-world observational study Perampanel和左乙拉西坦单药治疗中国局发性癫痫患者的有效性、安全性和耐受性比较:一项单中心、双视角、开放标签、真实世界的观察性研究。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70147
Haiyan Ma, Rui Zhang, Yan Zhang, Honghao Xu, Xuefeng Qu, Yiqing Yang, Jiajia Li, Lu Yang, Qigang Zhou, Haitao Zhu
<div> <section> <h3> Objective</h3> <p>To compare the effectiveness and safety of Perampanel (PER) and Levetiracetam (LEV) as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS).</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>This is a single-center, ambispective, open-label, real-world observational study. The PER arm of the study prospectively enrolled patients aged ≥4 years with FOS who visited Nanjing Brain Hospital during January 2020 to December 2021. These patients received PER monotherapy and were prospectively followed until January 2024. For the LEV arm, data were retrospectively collected from patients with FOS who started LEV monotherapy during January 2019 to December 2021, and these patients were retrospectively followed until January 2024. The primary endpoint was seizure-freedom rate (SFR) after 24 months of treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Seventy patients in the PER group and 77 patients in the LEV group were enrolled. The PER group had a non-significant trend of higher SFR than the LEV group at 24 months (58.6% vs. 41.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.06). At 6 and 12 months, PER showed significantly higher SFRs than LEV (69.8% vs. 48.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.01; 68.3% vs. 38.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). The two groups had comparable retention rates. The PER group had a significantly higher incidence of TEAEs than the LEV group (37.1% vs. 11.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) because of the significantly higher incidence of dizziness in the PER group. None of the TEAEs was serious.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Significance</h3> <p>Patients with FOS receiving PER monotherapy were more likely to achieve seizure freedom and had a higher incidence of dizziness than those receiving LEV monotherapy.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3> <p>This study compared the effectiveness and safety of PER and LEV as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS), in which 70 patients receiving PER monotherapy and 77 patients receiving LEV monotherapy were enrolled. Compared with LEV, PER had significantly higher seizure-freedom rates (SFRs) at 6 and 12 months and a non-significant trend of higher SFR at 24 months. The two treatments had comparable retention rates. Chinese patients with FOS receiving PER monotherapy were more likely to achieve seizure freedom and had a higher incidence of dizziness than LEV.</p> </section>
目的:比较Perampanel (PER)与左乙拉西坦(LEV)单药治疗中国局灶性癫痫(FOS)患者的有效性和安全性。方法:这是一项单中心、双视角、开放标签、真实世界观察性研究。该研究的PER组前瞻性纳入了2020年1月至2021年12月在南京脑科医院就诊的年龄≥4岁的FOS患者。这些患者接受PER单药治疗,前瞻性随访至2024年1月。对于LEV组,回顾性收集2019年1月至2021年12月期间开始LEV单药治疗的FOS患者的数据,并对这些患者进行回顾性随访至2024年1月。主要终点是治疗24个月后癫痫发作自由率(SFR)。记录治疗中出现的不良事件(teae)。结果:PER组70例,LEV组77例。PER组在24个月时SFR高于LEV组的趋势不显著(58.6%比41.3%,p = 0.06)。在6个月和12个月时,PER的SFRs明显高于LEV(69.8%比48.6%,p = 0.01; 68.3%比38.8%,p意义:FOS患者接受PER单药治疗比接受LEV单药治疗更容易实现癫痫发作自由,头晕发生率更高。摘要:本研究比较了PER和LEV作为单药治疗中国局灶性癫痫(FOS)患者的有效性和安全性,共纳入70例PER单药治疗和77例LEV单药治疗。与LEV相比,PER在6个月和12个月时的癫痫自由率(SFRs)显著高于LEV,而在24个月时SFR升高趋势不显著。两种治疗方法的保留率相当。与LEV相比,接受PER单药治疗的中国FOS患者更容易实现癫痫发作自由,头晕发生率更高。
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of Perampanel and Levetiracetam as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures: A single-center, ambispective, open-label, real-world observational study","authors":"Haiyan Ma,&nbsp;Rui Zhang,&nbsp;Yan Zhang,&nbsp;Honghao Xu,&nbsp;Xuefeng Qu,&nbsp;Yiqing Yang,&nbsp;Jiajia Li,&nbsp;Lu Yang,&nbsp;Qigang Zhou,&nbsp;Haitao Zhu","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70147","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70147","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To compare the effectiveness and safety of Perampanel (PER) and Levetiracetam (LEV) as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This is a single-center, ambispective, open-label, real-world observational study. The PER arm of the study prospectively enrolled patients aged ≥4 years with FOS who visited Nanjing Brain Hospital during January 2020 to December 2021. These patients received PER monotherapy and were prospectively followed until January 2024. For the LEV arm, data were retrospectively collected from patients with FOS who started LEV monotherapy during January 2019 to December 2021, and these patients were retrospectively followed until January 2024. The primary endpoint was seizure-freedom rate (SFR) after 24 months of treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Seventy patients in the PER group and 77 patients in the LEV group were enrolled. The PER group had a non-significant trend of higher SFR than the LEV group at 24 months (58.6% vs. 41.3%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.06). At 6 and 12 months, PER showed significantly higher SFRs than LEV (69.8% vs. 48.6%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.01; 68.3% vs. 38.8%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001, respectively). The two groups had comparable retention rates. The PER group had a significantly higher incidence of TEAEs than the LEV group (37.1% vs. 11.7%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001) because of the significantly higher incidence of dizziness in the PER group. None of the TEAEs was serious.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Significance&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Patients with FOS receiving PER monotherapy were more likely to achieve seizure freedom and had a higher incidence of dizziness than those receiving LEV monotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Plain Language Summary&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study compared the effectiveness and safety of PER and LEV as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS), in which 70 patients receiving PER monotherapy and 77 patients receiving LEV monotherapy were enrolled. Compared with LEV, PER had significantly higher seizure-freedom rates (SFRs) at 6 and 12 months and a non-significant trend of higher SFR at 24 months. The two treatments had comparable retention rates. Chinese patients with FOS receiving PER monotherapy were more likely to achieve seizure freedom and had a higher incidence of dizziness than LEV.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"89-100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12903825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145833544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Objective outcome assessment in epilepsy surgery using ultralong-term subcutaneous EEG: A case report 超长时间皮下脑电图对癫痫手术疗效的客观评价:1例报告。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70205
Tamara Lisy, Johannes Peter Koren, Christina Duarte, Clemens Lang, Susanne Pirker, Matthias Tomschik, Karl Rössler, Christoph Baumgartner

Accurate seizure documentation is essential in guiding treatment decisions in epilepsy but still heavily relies on highly subjective and sometimes unreliable patient reports. We report a case of medically refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy where subcutaneous EEG revealed persistence of seizures following add-on antiseizure medication despite the patient's self-report of seizure freedom. Thus, ultralong-term EEG subcutaneous monitoring provided valuable information on medical refractoriness and supported the decision to proceed to surgical intervention. Subcutaneous EEG monitoring was continued after resective surgery and has shown no further seizures to this date. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case utilizing subcutaneous EEG for objective seizure documentation both pre- and post-surgery.

Plain Language Summary

Making the right treatment decisions depends on knowing the seizure frequency of a person with epilepsy, but patients' reports are often inaccurate. In our case, we describe a patient in which seizures were only detected because of a small electrode implanted under the skin to record brain activity (subcutaneous EEG). Based on this information, the patient received brain surgery, and the device was left in place after surgery, showing no further seizures. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case where this type of EEG device was used to track seizures both before and after epilepsy surgery.

准确的癫痫发作记录对于指导癫痫的治疗决策至关重要,但仍然严重依赖高度主观和有时不可靠的患者报告。我们报告一例医学上难治性内侧颞叶癫痫,皮下脑电图显示持续癫痫发作后附加抗癫痫药物,尽管病人的自我报告癫痫发作自由。因此,超长期脑电图皮下监测提供了医学难治性的宝贵信息,并支持进行手术干预的决定。切除手术后继续进行皮下脑电图监测,到目前为止没有发现进一步的癫痫发作。据我们所知,这是第一例在术前和术后使用皮下脑电图客观记录癫痫发作的病例。摘要:做出正确的治疗决定取决于了解癫痫患者的发作频率,但患者的报告往往不准确。在我们的案例中,我们描述了一位患者,由于在皮肤下植入了一个小电极来记录大脑活动(皮下脑电图),所以癫痫发作只能被检测到。根据这些信息,病人接受了脑部手术,手术后装置被留在原地,没有再出现癫痫发作。据我们所知,这是第一例使用这种类型的脑电图设备来跟踪癫痫手术前后的癫痫发作。
{"title":"Objective outcome assessment in epilepsy surgery using ultralong-term subcutaneous EEG: A case report","authors":"Tamara Lisy,&nbsp;Johannes Peter Koren,&nbsp;Christina Duarte,&nbsp;Clemens Lang,&nbsp;Susanne Pirker,&nbsp;Matthias Tomschik,&nbsp;Karl Rössler,&nbsp;Christoph Baumgartner","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70205","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70205","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Accurate seizure documentation is essential in guiding treatment decisions in epilepsy but still heavily relies on highly subjective and sometimes unreliable patient reports. We report a case of medically refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy where subcutaneous EEG revealed persistence of seizures following add-on antiseizure medication despite the patient's self-report of seizure freedom. Thus, ultralong-term EEG subcutaneous monitoring provided valuable information on medical refractoriness and supported the decision to proceed to surgical intervention. Subcutaneous EEG monitoring was continued after resective surgery and has shown no further seizures to this date. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case utilizing subcutaneous EEG for objective seizure documentation both pre- and post-surgery.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Making the right treatment decisions depends on knowing the seizure frequency of a person with epilepsy, but patients' reports are often inaccurate. In our case, we describe a patient in which seizures were only detected because of a small electrode implanted under the skin to record brain activity (subcutaneous EEG). Based on this information, the patient received brain surgery, and the device was left in place after surgery, showing no further seizures. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case where this type of EEG device was used to track seizures both before and after epilepsy surgery.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"340-346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12903795/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145803515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A multi-feature method for real-time seizure detection in pediatric intensive care unit 一种用于儿科重症监护病房癫痫发作实时检测的多特征方法。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70171
Tian Sang, Jiong Deng, Tong Zhao, Qi Zhang, Qiao Guan, Yanqin Lei, Yuxiang Yan, Bo Hong, Ningning Wei, Yuwu Jiang, Ying Wang
<div> <section> <h3> Purpose</h3> <p>Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is an important technique used in detecting electroclinical seizures in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This study developed an artificial intelligence method for the real-time automatic detection of seizures in the PICU.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>We designed an artificial intelligence method to analyze EEG, electromyography (EMG), and electrocardiography (ECG) signals, detecting features from multiple dimensions, extracting candidate signal fragments in real time, and analyzing the relevant indicators of these fragments to determine whether they indicate electroclinical seizures. We tested the sensitivity and specificity of the detection system on patients with seizures who were hospitalized in the PICU of Peking University First Hospital and received cEEG monitoring.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>A total of 28 PICU patients were collected, including 17 boys and 11 girls, with a median age of 4.30 (1.02–7.00) years. Sixteen patients had convulsive status epilepticus, of which eight were generalized and eight were focal. Twelve patients had cluster seizures, of which seven were generalized and five were focal. A total of 218.73 h of EEG data were collected from all 28 EEG records. The electroencephalography physician annotated a total of 1561 seizures, whereas the algorithm detected a total of 1095 seizures. The overall detection sensitivity was 94%, and the overall false detection rate was 0.18 (0.03–0.28)/h. There was no statistical difference in the sensitivity and false detection rate between focal and generalized seizures.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>The detection system has high sensitivity and specificity, suggesting great potential for future real-time automatic detection of electroclinical seizures in the PICU.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3> <p>We developed a computer program that helps doctors quickly detect seizures in critically ill children by analyzing brain activity, muscle movements, and heart rate signals. The system was designed specifically for the challenging environment of pediatric intensive care units, where timely seizure detection is particularly important but often difficult. The program reliably identified seizures that showed both brain activity and physical signs, matching doctors' diagnoses. This technology marks an important step toward bet
目的:连续脑电图(cEEG)监测是儿科重症监护病房(PICU)检测电临床癫痫发作的重要技术。本研究开发了一种用于PICU中癫痫发作实时自动检测的人工智能方法。方法:设计一种人工智能方法对脑电图、肌电图、心电图信号进行分析,从多个维度检测特征,实时提取候选信号片段,分析这些片段的相关指标,判断其是否预示电临床癫痫发作。我们对北京大学第一医院PICU住院并接受脑电图监测的癫痫发作患者检测系统的敏感性和特异性进行了测试。结果:共收集PICU患者28例,其中男17例,女11例,中位年龄4.30(1.02 ~ 7.00)岁。16例患者有惊厥性癫痫持续状态,其中8例为全身性,8例为局灶性。12例患者有丛集性癫痫发作,其中7例为全身性,5例为局灶性。28例脑电记录共采集脑电数据218.73 h。脑电图医生共记录了1561次癫痫发作,而算法共检测到1095次癫痫发作。总体检测灵敏度为94%,总体误检率为0.18 (0.03 ~ 0.28)/h。局灶性和全面性癫痫的灵敏度和误检率无统计学差异。结论:该检测系统具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,为今后PICU电临床癫痫发作的实时自动检测提供了广阔的应用前景。简单的语言总结:我们开发了一个计算机程序,通过分析大脑活动、肌肉运动和心率信号,帮助医生快速检测危重儿童的癫痫发作。该系统是专门为儿科重症监护病房的挑战性环境而设计的,在那里及时检测癫痫发作特别重要,但往往很困难。该程序可靠地识别出癫痫发作,显示出大脑活动和身体体征,与医生的诊断相符。这项技术标志着朝着更好地监测和护理患有癫痫的危重儿童迈出了重要的一步。
{"title":"A multi-feature method for real-time seizure detection in pediatric intensive care unit","authors":"Tian Sang,&nbsp;Jiong Deng,&nbsp;Tong Zhao,&nbsp;Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Qiao Guan,&nbsp;Yanqin Lei,&nbsp;Yuxiang Yan,&nbsp;Bo Hong,&nbsp;Ningning Wei,&nbsp;Yuwu Jiang,&nbsp;Ying Wang","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70171","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70171","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is an important technique used in detecting electroclinical seizures in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This study developed an artificial intelligence method for the real-time automatic detection of seizures in the PICU.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We designed an artificial intelligence method to analyze EEG, electromyography (EMG), and electrocardiography (ECG) signals, detecting features from multiple dimensions, extracting candidate signal fragments in real time, and analyzing the relevant indicators of these fragments to determine whether they indicate electroclinical seizures. We tested the sensitivity and specificity of the detection system on patients with seizures who were hospitalized in the PICU of Peking University First Hospital and received cEEG monitoring.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A total of 28 PICU patients were collected, including 17 boys and 11 girls, with a median age of 4.30 (1.02–7.00) years. Sixteen patients had convulsive status epilepticus, of which eight were generalized and eight were focal. Twelve patients had cluster seizures, of which seven were generalized and five were focal. A total of 218.73 h of EEG data were collected from all 28 EEG records. The electroencephalography physician annotated a total of 1561 seizures, whereas the algorithm detected a total of 1095 seizures. The overall detection sensitivity was 94%, and the overall false detection rate was 0.18 (0.03–0.28)/h. There was no statistical difference in the sensitivity and false detection rate between focal and generalized seizures.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The detection system has high sensitivity and specificity, suggesting great potential for future real-time automatic detection of electroclinical seizures in the PICU.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Plain Language Summary&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We developed a computer program that helps doctors quickly detect seizures in critically ill children by analyzing brain activity, muscle movements, and heart rate signals. The system was designed specifically for the challenging environment of pediatric intensive care units, where timely seizure detection is particularly important but often difficult. The program reliably identified seizures that showed both brain activity and physical signs, matching doctors' diagnoses. This technology marks an important step toward bet","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"112-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12903821/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145793584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Distinct medial temporal volumetric signatures in extra-medial temporal lobe lesional epilepsy 内侧颞叶外病变性癫痫中明显的内侧颞叶体积特征。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70201
Yonatan Serlin, Bijal Patel, Elena Hayday, Alexandrea Kilgore-Gomez, Tianxia Wu, Shareena A. Rahman, William H. Theodore, Sara K. Inati
<div> <section> <h3> Objective</h3> <p>To quantify amygdala and hippocampal volumetric asymmetries in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and extra-medial temporal lesions (EMTLs) and to assess the prevalence of structural alterations relative to drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE), and healthy individuals.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>Retrospective cross-sectional study of 298 participants evaluated at the NIH Clinical Center (2004–2023), including 252 patients with focal DRE and 46 healthy volunteers. Of the DRE cohort, 63 had lateralized EMTL (48 left, 15 right). High-resolution brain MRIs were segmented and analyzed to obtain normalized amygdala and hippocampal volumes. An asymmetry index (AI) assessed directionality, and absolute AI measured magnitude. Atrophy and hypertrophy were defined relative to healthy medians using robust dispersion thresholds. Group comparisons incorporated correction for multiple testing.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Dual pathology with mesial temporal sclerosis was radiologically identified in 20.6% of EMTL cases, predominantly ipsilateral. Adjusted amygdala and hippocampal volumes did not differ significantly across groups, and consistent amygdala atrophy was not observed. Left EMTL showed increased hippocampal asymmetry magnitude and a 39.6% prevalence of ipsilateral hippocampal atrophy, comparable to left TLE (34%). Right EMTL showed loss of the physiologic left-smaller-than-right hippocampal pattern, with hypertrophy in the right amygdala (40%), left amygdala (46.7%), and contralateral hippocampus (40%), as well as ipsilateral hippocampal atrophy in 26.7%.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Significance</h3> <p>We found mesial temporal volumetric changes in a significant proportion of EMTL patients. Directional, magnitude, and outlier-based analyses help disentangle coexisting atrophy and hypertrophy, revealing potential compensatory network-level changes in EMTL-associated DRE not previously identified.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3> <p>This study looked at changes in two brain structures, the amygdala and hippocampus, in people with treatment-resistant epilepsy associated with lesions outside the medial temporal lobe. We found that patients with lesions on the left side often had a small left hippocampus, while those with right-sided lesions showed more complex patterns, including enlargement of both the
目的:量化耐药癫痫(DRE)和内侧颞叶外病变(EMTLs)患者的杏仁核和海马体积不对称,并评估相对于耐药颞叶癫痫(TLE)、颞叶外癫痫(ETLE)和健康人的结构改变的患病率。方法:对2004-2023年在NIH临床中心评估的298名参与者进行回顾性横断面研究,其中包括252名局灶性DRE患者和46名健康志愿者。在DRE组中,63例EMTL侧化(48例左侧,15例右侧)。对高分辨率脑核磁共振成像进行分割和分析,以获得正常化的杏仁核和海马体积。不对称指数(AI)评估方向性,绝对AI测量量级。使用稳健的离散阈值来定义相对于健康中位数的萎缩和肥大。组间比较纳入多重检验校正。结果:在20.6%的EMTL病例中,影像学上发现双重病理伴颞内侧硬化,主要是同侧。调整后的杏仁核和海马体积在各组之间没有显著差异,也没有观察到一致的杏仁核萎缩。左侧EMTL显示海马不对称程度增加,同侧海马萎缩发生率为39.6%,与左侧TLE(34%)相当。右侧EMTL显示生理性左-小-右海马模式的丧失,右侧杏仁核(40%)、左侧杏仁核(46.7%)和对侧海马(40%)肥大,同侧海马萎缩26.7%。意义:我们在EMTL患者中发现了相当大比例的颞内体积变化。方向、大小和基于异常值的分析有助于解开萎缩和肥大共存的问题,揭示了emtl相关DRE中潜在的代偿网络水平的变化,这些变化以前没有被发现。摘要:这项研究观察了与内侧颞叶外病变相关的难治性癫痫患者的两个大脑结构——杏仁核和海马体的变化。我们发现左侧病变的患者通常有一个小的左侧海马,而右侧病变的患者表现出更复杂的模式,包括杏仁核和左侧海马的肿大,而较少出现小的右侧海马。这些发现表明,对大脑不对称的详细测量可以揭示标准评估所遗漏的变化,并可能帮助医生更好地定位癫痫发作活动和制定治疗计划。
{"title":"Distinct medial temporal volumetric signatures in extra-medial temporal lobe lesional epilepsy","authors":"Yonatan Serlin,&nbsp;Bijal Patel,&nbsp;Elena Hayday,&nbsp;Alexandrea Kilgore-Gomez,&nbsp;Tianxia Wu,&nbsp;Shareena A. Rahman,&nbsp;William H. Theodore,&nbsp;Sara K. Inati","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70201","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70201","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To quantify amygdala and hippocampal volumetric asymmetries in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and extra-medial temporal lesions (EMTLs) and to assess the prevalence of structural alterations relative to drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE), and healthy individuals.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Retrospective cross-sectional study of 298 participants evaluated at the NIH Clinical Center (2004–2023), including 252 patients with focal DRE and 46 healthy volunteers. Of the DRE cohort, 63 had lateralized EMTL (48 left, 15 right). High-resolution brain MRIs were segmented and analyzed to obtain normalized amygdala and hippocampal volumes. An asymmetry index (AI) assessed directionality, and absolute AI measured magnitude. Atrophy and hypertrophy were defined relative to healthy medians using robust dispersion thresholds. Group comparisons incorporated correction for multiple testing.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Dual pathology with mesial temporal sclerosis was radiologically identified in 20.6% of EMTL cases, predominantly ipsilateral. Adjusted amygdala and hippocampal volumes did not differ significantly across groups, and consistent amygdala atrophy was not observed. Left EMTL showed increased hippocampal asymmetry magnitude and a 39.6% prevalence of ipsilateral hippocampal atrophy, comparable to left TLE (34%). Right EMTL showed loss of the physiologic left-smaller-than-right hippocampal pattern, with hypertrophy in the right amygdala (40%), left amygdala (46.7%), and contralateral hippocampus (40%), as well as ipsilateral hippocampal atrophy in 26.7%.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Significance&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We found mesial temporal volumetric changes in a significant proportion of EMTL patients. Directional, magnitude, and outlier-based analyses help disentangle coexisting atrophy and hypertrophy, revealing potential compensatory network-level changes in EMTL-associated DRE not previously identified.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Plain Language Summary&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study looked at changes in two brain structures, the amygdala and hippocampus, in people with treatment-resistant epilepsy associated with lesions outside the medial temporal lobe. We found that patients with lesions on the left side often had a small left hippocampus, while those with right-sided lesions showed more complex patterns, including enlargement of both the ","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"230-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12903800/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145793507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epilepsia Open—December 2025 Announcements 癫痫病开放2025年12月公告
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70198
<p> <b>15th ILAE School on Pre-Surgical Evaluation for Epilepsy and Epilepsy Surgery</b> </p><p>19–23 January 2026</p><p>Brno, Czech Republic</p><p> <b>19th Latin American Summer School on Epilepsy</b> </p><p>23–28 February 2026</p><p>Guadalajara, Mexico</p><p> <b>8th ILAE School on EEG in the First Year of Life</b> </p><p>30 March–2 April 2026</p><p>Cambridge, UK</p><p> <b>5th International Summer School of Neuropsychology</b> </p><p>19–24 April 2026</p><p>Picardy, France</p><p> <b>ILAE School on Neuroimaging 2026</b> </p><p>6–9 May 2026</p><p>Potsdam, Germany</p><p> <b>XIV Congreso Latinoamericano de Epilepsia</b> </p><p>16–18 May 2026</p><p>Lima, Peru</p><p> <b>1º Curso Latinoamericano de EEG Pediátrico</b> </p><p>6–9 August 2026</p><p>TBC</p><p> <b>16th European Epilepsy Congress</b> </p><p>5–9 September 2026</p><p>Athens, Greece</p><p> <b>16th International Summer School for Neuropathology and Epilepsy Surgery</b> </p><p>10–13 September 2026</p><p>Erlangen, Germany</p><p> <b>16th Asian & Oceanian Epilepsy Congress</b> </p><p>19–22 November 2026</p><p>Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</p><p> <b>37th International Epilepsy Congress</b> </p><p>28 August–1 September 2027</p><p>Amsterdam, Netherlands</p><p> <b>YES Education Series: Management of Acute Repetitive Seizures & Status Epilepticus</b> </p><p>11 December 2025</p><p> <b>ILAE e-Forum: EEG: When, why and how?</b> </p><p>12 December 2025</p><p> <b>Side Effects of Anti-Seizure Medications</b> </p><p>12 December 2025</p><p> <b>Genetic des encéphalopathies développementales et épileptiques</b> </p><p>16 December 2025</p><p> <b>EEG and Coma</b> </p><p>20 January 2026</p><p> <b>Encephalitis 2025</b> </p><p>3–4 December 2025</p><p>London, UK & Online</p><p> <b>AES 2025 Annual Meeting</b> </p><p>5–9 December 2025</p><p>Atlanta, Georgia, USA</p><p> <b>British Neurosurgical Research Group Meeting 2025</b> </p><p>8–9 December 2025</p><p>London, England</p>
第15届ILAE癫痫术前评估和癫痫手术学校2026年1月19日至23日,布尔诺,捷克共和国,第19届拉丁美洲癫痫暑期学校2026年2月23日至28日,瓜达拉哈拉,墨西哥,第八届ILAE学校在生命的第一年脑电图2026年3月30日至4月2日,剑桥英国第五届国际神经心理学暑期学校2026年4月19-24日法国皮卡第ILAE神经影像学学校2026年5月6-9日德国波茨坦第十四届拉丁美洲癫痫大会2026年5月16-18日利马秘鲁1ºCurso latin americano de EEG Pediátrico 2026年8月6-9日tbc第16届欧洲癫痫大会2026年9月5-9日希腊雅典第16届国际神经病理学和癫痫外科暑期学校2026年9月10-13日埃尔兰根,第37届国际癫痫大会2027年8月28日至9月1日,荷兰阿姆斯特丹,YES教育系列:急性反复发作和癫痫持续状态的管理2025年12月11日ILAE电子论坛:脑电图;什么时候,为什么,怎么做?2025年12月12日抗癫痫药物的副作用2025年12月12日遗传性包膜病和包膜病和包膜病2025年12月16日脑电图和昏迷2025年1月20日脑炎2025年12月3-4日伦敦英国在线AES 2025年会2025年12月5日至9日美国乔治亚州亚特兰大英国神经外科研究小组会议2025年12月8日至9日英国伦敦第四届高级癫痫成像2025年12月12日至14日意大利罗马儿科癫痫培训1 2025年12月13日丹吉尔第4届欧洲神经病学和神经精神病学大会2026年2月23日至24日,法国,巴黎,儿科癫痫培训2 - 2026年2月26日至27日英国儿科癫痫培训3 - 2026年2月26-27日布里斯托尔,英国布里斯托尔第四届国际癫痫和神经疾病人工智能会议2026年3月16-19日波多黎各圣胡安epped课程:2026年5月3日至6日,西班牙马德里,第20届专家癫痫教学周末,2026年5月16日至17日,英国伯明翰,第64届德国癫痫学会年会,2026年6月10日至13日,w rzburg,2026年6月11日至12日,英国利兹,英国利兹,第22届圣Servolo高级癫痫课程2026年7月20日至31日,圣Servolo(威尼斯),2026年8月31日至9月12日tbc第一届瑞士神经周2026年11月18日至20日瑞士伯尔尼
{"title":"Epilepsia Open—December 2025 Announcements","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70198","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;15th ILAE School on Pre-Surgical Evaluation for Epilepsy and Epilepsy Surgery&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19–23 January 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brno, Czech Republic&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;19th Latin American Summer School on Epilepsy&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;23–28 February 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Guadalajara, Mexico&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;8th ILAE School on EEG in the First Year of Life&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;30 March–2 April 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cambridge, UK&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;5th International Summer School of Neuropsychology&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19–24 April 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Picardy, France&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;ILAE School on Neuroimaging 2026&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6–9 May 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Potsdam, Germany&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;XIV Congreso Latinoamericano de Epilepsia&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16–18 May 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lima, Peru&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;1º Curso Latinoamericano de EEG Pediátrico&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6–9 August 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TBC&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;16th European Epilepsy Congress&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5–9 September 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Athens, Greece&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;16th International Summer School for Neuropathology and Epilepsy Surgery&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10–13 September 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Erlangen, Germany&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;16th Asian &amp; Oceanian Epilepsy Congress&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;19–22 November 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;37th International Epilepsy Congress&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;28 August–1 September 2027&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Amsterdam, Netherlands&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;YES Education Series: Management of Acute Repetitive Seizures &amp; Status Epilepticus&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;11 December 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;ILAE e-Forum: EEG: When, why and how?&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12 December 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;Side Effects of Anti-Seizure Medications&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;12 December 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;Genetic des encéphalopathies développementales et épileptiques&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;16 December 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;EEG and Coma&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;20 January 2026&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;Encephalitis 2025&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3–4 December 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;London, UK &amp; Online&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;AES 2025 Annual Meeting&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;5–9 December 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Atlanta, Georgia, USA&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;b&gt;British Neurosurgical Research Group Meeting 2025&lt;/b&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8–9 December 2025&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;London, England&lt;/p&gt;","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"10 6","pages":"2039-2040"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70198","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145792506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Distinctive genetic architecture of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome compared to self-limited infantile epilepsy by trios whole-exome sequencing 通过三组全外显子组测序比较婴儿癫痫痉挛综合征与自限性婴儿癫痫的独特遗传结构。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70208
Yihong Sun, Ningning Chen, Congjie Chen, Weitian Lu, Qian Wan, Tingsong Li, Yupeng Cun

Objective

Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) and self-limited infantile epilepsy (SeLIE) are both genetically heterogeneous disorders during infancy with distinct prognoses. To better define the genetic spectrum of IESS, we performed a comparative genetic analysis using SeLIE cases as a reference group.

Methods

We performed whole-exome sequencing in a Chinese cohort comprising 54 parent–offspring trios with IESS and 37 trios or quartets with SeLIE.

Results

Causal pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 61% (56/92) of patients, distributed across 20 different genes. Among these, 10 (29%) variants were novel. A definitive genetic diagnosis was achieved in 37% (20/54) of IESS patients, involving 17 distinct genes, indicating a high degree of genetic heterogeneity. In contrast, SeLIE patients had a much higher diagnostic yield of 95% (36/38), with variants concentrated in only four genes. By comparing de novo mutations in protein-coding regions between the IESS and SeLIE cohorts, we identified both shared and potentially novel variants. Notably, there was a trend toward an increased burden of de novo loss-of-function variants in IESS compared to SeLIE. Among IESS patients, 51.9% (28/54) responded to initial hormonal therapy, while 38.9% (21/54) failed to respond.

Significance

These integrative genomic analyses provide new insights into the pathogenesis of IESS, underscoring a more complex and heterogeneous genetic landscape in IESS compared to SeLIE.

Plain Language Summary

This study investigated the genetic architecture of two infantile epilepsy syndromes: IESS and SeLIE. We demonstrated that IESS has a more heterogeneous genetic background, whereas SeLIE is associated with more specific variants. These findings provide novel insights into the genetic underpinnings of IESS.

目的:婴儿癫痫痉挛综合征(IESS)和自限性婴儿癫痫(SeLIE)都是婴儿时期遗传异质性疾病,预后不同。为了更好地定义IESS的遗传谱,我们以SeLIE病例作为参照组进行了比较遗传分析。方法:我们在一个中国队列中进行了全外显子组测序,该队列包括54对患有IESS的父母-后代三人组和37对患有SeLIE的三人组或四人组。结果:61%(56/92)的患者发现了致病或可能致病的变异,分布在20个不同的基因中。其中,10个(29%)变异是新的。37%(20/54)的IESS患者获得了明确的遗传诊断,涉及17个不同的基因,表明遗传异质性很高。相比之下,SeLIE患者的诊断率要高得多,为95%(36/38),变异仅集中在四个基因上。通过比较IESS和SeLIE队列中蛋白质编码区域的新生突变,我们确定了共享的和潜在的新变体。值得注意的是,与SeLIE相比,IESS中新生功能丧失变异的负担有增加的趋势。在IESS患者中,51.9%(28/54)对初始激素治疗有应答,38.9%(21/54)无效。意义:这些综合基因组分析为IESS的发病机制提供了新的见解,强调了与SeLIE相比,IESS的遗传格局更为复杂和异质性。摘要:本研究探讨了两种婴儿癫痫综合征:IESS和SeLIE的遗传结构。我们证明了IESS具有更异质性的遗传背景,而SeLIE则与更特定的变体相关。这些发现为IESS的遗传基础提供了新的见解。
{"title":"Distinctive genetic architecture of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome compared to self-limited infantile epilepsy by trios whole-exome sequencing","authors":"Yihong Sun,&nbsp;Ningning Chen,&nbsp;Congjie Chen,&nbsp;Weitian Lu,&nbsp;Qian Wan,&nbsp;Tingsong Li,&nbsp;Yupeng Cun","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70208","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70208","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) and self-limited infantile epilepsy (SeLIE) are both genetically heterogeneous disorders during infancy with distinct prognoses. To better define the genetic spectrum of IESS, we performed a comparative genetic analysis using SeLIE cases as a reference group.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We performed whole-exome sequencing in a Chinese cohort comprising 54 parent–offspring trios with IESS and 37 trios or quartets with SeLIE.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Causal pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 61% (56/92) of patients, distributed across 20 different genes. Among these, 10 (29%) variants were novel. A definitive genetic diagnosis was achieved in 37% (20/54) of IESS patients, involving 17 distinct genes, indicating a high degree of genetic heterogeneity. In contrast, SeLIE patients had a much higher diagnostic yield of 95% (36/38), with variants concentrated in only four genes. By comparing de novo mutations in protein-coding regions between the IESS and SeLIE cohorts, we identified both shared and potentially novel variants. Notably, there was a trend toward an increased burden of de novo loss-of-function variants in IESS compared to SeLIE. Among IESS patients, 51.9% (28/54) responded to initial hormonal therapy, while 38.9% (21/54) failed to respond.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These integrative genomic analyses provide new insights into the pathogenesis of IESS, underscoring a more complex and heterogeneous genetic landscape in IESS compared to SeLIE.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study investigated the genetic architecture of two infantile epilepsy syndromes: IESS and SeLIE. We demonstrated that IESS has a more heterogeneous genetic background, whereas SeLIE is associated with more specific variants. These findings provide novel insights into the genetic underpinnings of IESS.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"280-290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12903797/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145793629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence and clinical predictors of epilepsy after febrile seizures in children: A prospective cohort study in Vietnam 越南儿童热性癫痫发作后癫痫的发病率和临床预测因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70207
Anh H. Bui, Van K. T. Le, Hong K. Tang

Objective

Febrile seizures (FS) are common and usually self-limited, yet a subset of children develop epilepsy. Early risk stratification remains challenging, particularly in resource-limited settings with limited access to long-term neurologic follow-up. We aimed to estimate the incidence and identify the most robust predictors of epilepsy following FS in children.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study at Children's Hospital 2 (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam), 631 children aged 1 month to 6 years with first FS were enrolled (March 2023–March 2024) and followed through July 2025. Children with any history of seizures prior to the index FS were excluded. Epilepsy was defined per the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) 2014 criteria. Predictor selection used clinical reasoning and Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA), followed by multivariable Cox regression. Discrimination was evaluated using Harrell's C-index and time-dependent AUC; internal validation was performed with bootstrap resampling.

Results

Over a median follow-up of 2.0 years, 35 children (5.5%) developed epilepsy, corresponding to an incidence of 29 per 1000 person-years. After BMA, four independent predictors were retained: neurodevelopmental delay (HR = 8.78), family history of epilepsy (HR = 2.66), focal seizures (HR = 3.23), and each additional FS recurrence (HR = 1.50). The predictor set showed strong discrimination (C-index: 0.87; AUC at 24 months: 0.89 with 95% CI: 0.82, 0.95).

Significance

This parsimonious set of clinical predictors may support early counseling and targeted follow-up of children with FS, especially where pediatric neurology resources are limited. Model development and validation are ongoing.

Plain Language Summary

We followed 631 children after their first febrile seizure to see who might later develop epilepsy. About 5.5% of children developed epilepsy within 2 years. Children with developmental delay, focal seizures, a family history of epilepsy, or repeated FS were at higher risk. Using these four simple factors may help doctors give families clearer advice and closer follow-up, especially where access to pediatric neurologists is limited.

目的:热性惊厥(FS)是常见的,通常是自限性的,但儿童的一个子集发展癫痫。早期风险分层仍然具有挑战性,特别是在资源有限的环境中,长期神经病学随访机会有限。我们的目的是估计儿童FS后癫痫的发生率,并确定最可靠的预测因素。方法:在越南胡志明市第二儿童医院进行的这项前瞻性队列研究中,631名1个月至6岁的首次FS患儿(2023年3月至2024年3月)入组,随访至2025年7月。在FS指数之前有任何癫痫发作史的儿童被排除在外。癫痫是根据国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE) 2014年标准定义的。预测因子选择采用临床推理和贝叶斯平均模型(BMA),然后采用多变量Cox回归。采用Harrell’sc指数和随时间变化的AUC评价歧视;内部验证是通过自举重采样进行的。结果:在中位随访2.0年期间,35名儿童(5.5%)发生癫痫,对应的发病率为每1000人年29例。BMA后,保留了四个独立的预测因素:神经发育迟缓(HR = 8.78)、癫痫家族史(HR = 2.66)、局灶性发作(HR = 3.23)和每次额外的FS复发(HR = 1.50)。预测集显示出很强的判别性(C-index: 0.87; 24个月时AUC: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.95)。意义:这一简洁的临床预测指标可以支持FS患儿的早期咨询和有针对性的随访,特别是在小儿神经学资源有限的地区。模型开发和验证正在进行中。简单的语言总结:我们在631名儿童第一次发热性癫痫发作后进行了随访,看看谁以后可能会发展为癫痫。约5.5%的儿童在两年内患上癫痫。发育迟缓、局灶性癫痫发作、有癫痫家族史或反复FS的儿童风险更高。使用这四个简单的因素可以帮助医生给家庭更清晰的建议和更密切的随访,特别是在儿科神经学家有限的情况下。
{"title":"Incidence and clinical predictors of epilepsy after febrile seizures in children: A prospective cohort study in Vietnam","authors":"Anh H. Bui,&nbsp;Van K. T. Le,&nbsp;Hong K. Tang","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70207","DOIUrl":"10.1002/epi4.70207","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Febrile seizures (FS) are common and usually self-limited, yet a subset of children develop epilepsy. Early risk stratification remains challenging, particularly in resource-limited settings with limited access to long-term neurologic follow-up. We aimed to estimate the incidence and identify the most robust predictors of epilepsy following FS in children.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In this prospective cohort study at Children's Hospital 2 (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam), 631 children aged 1 month to 6 years with first FS were enrolled (March 2023–March 2024) and followed through July 2025. Children with any history of seizures prior to the index FS were excluded. Epilepsy was defined per the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) 2014 criteria. Predictor selection used clinical reasoning and Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA), followed by multivariable Cox regression. Discrimination was evaluated using Harrell's C-index and time-dependent AUC; internal validation was performed with bootstrap resampling.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Over a median follow-up of 2.0 years, 35 children (5.5%) developed epilepsy, corresponding to an incidence of 29 per 1000 person-years. After BMA, four independent predictors were retained: neurodevelopmental delay (HR = 8.78), family history of epilepsy (HR = 2.66), focal seizures (HR = 3.23), and each additional FS recurrence (HR = 1.50). The predictor set showed strong discrimination (C-index: 0.87; AUC at 24 months: 0.89 with 95% CI: 0.82, 0.95).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Significance</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This parsimonious set of clinical predictors may support early counseling and targeted follow-up of children with FS, especially where pediatric neurology resources are limited. Model development and validation are ongoing.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We followed 631 children after their first febrile seizure to see who might later develop epilepsy. About 5.5% of children developed epilepsy within 2 years. Children with developmental delay, focal seizures, a family history of epilepsy, or repeated FS were at higher risk. Using these four simple factors may help doctors give families clearer advice and closer follow-up, especially where access to pediatric neurologists is limited.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"270-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12903822/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145773967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Epilepsia Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1