European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice最新文献

Objectives: To investigate the performance and risk associated with the usage of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) to answer drug-related questions.

Methods: A sample of 50 drug-related questions were consecutively collected and entered in the artificial intelligence software application ChatGPT. Answers were documented and rated in a standardised consensus process by six senior hospital pharmacists in the domains content (correct, incomplete, false), patient management (possible, insufficient, not possible) and risk (no risk, low risk, high risk). As reference, answers were researched in adherence to the German guideline of drug information and stratified in four categories according to the sources used. In addition, the reproducibility of ChatGPT's answers was analysed by entering three questions at different timepoints repeatedly (day 1, day 2, week 2, week 3).

Results: Overall, only 13 of 50 answers provided correct content and had enough information to initiate management with no risk of patient harm. The majority of answers were either false (38%, n=19) or had partly correct content (36%, n=18) and no references were provided. A high risk of patient harm was likely in 26% (n=13) of the cases and risk was judged low for 28% (n=14) of the cases. In all high-risk cases, actions could have been initiated based on the provided information. The answers of ChatGPT varied over time when entered repeatedly and only three out of 12 answers were identical, showing no reproducibility to low reproducibility.

Conclusion: In a real-world sample of 50 drug-related questions, ChatGPT answered the majority of questions wrong or partly wrong. The use of artificial intelligence applications in drug information is not possible as long as barriers like wrong content, missing references and reproducibility remain.

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the physicochemical stability of mitomycin-containing medicinal products for bladder instillation, formulated with urea as excipient (mito-medac®, Mitomycin medac). For comparison, the stability of reconstituted Urocin® and Mitem® bladder instillation was studied.

Methods: Mitomycin-containing medicinal products were either reconstituted with the prepackaged 0.9% NaCl solution, nominal volume 20 mL (mito-medac®, Mitem®, Urocin®) or with 20 mL water for injection (Mitomycin medac, Mitem®, Urocin®) to a nominal concentration of 1 mg/mL and stored at room temperature (20-25°C). Samples were taken immediately after reconstitution and after 24 hours. Physicochemical stability was determined by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection, measurement of pH and osmolarity, and inspection for visible particles or colour changes.

Results: The initial pH values of the test solutions reconstituted with prepackaged 0.9% NaCl (5.2-5.6) were significantly lower than those reconstituted with water for injection (6.6-7.4). Solutions reconstituted with 0.9% NaCl solutions rapidly degraded and concentrations fell below the 90% limit after 24 hours of storage. When reconstituted with water for injection, degradation was less rapid. Concentrations of Mitomycin medac and Urocin remained above the 90% limit after 24 hours.

Conclusions: The physicochemical stability of mitomycin 1 mg/mL bladder instillation prepared with prepackaged 0.9% NaCl in prefilled PVC bags is less than 24 hours at room temperature. Unfavourable pH values of the solvents cause rapid degradation of mitomycin. Mitomycin solutions reconstituted at the point of care should be administered immediately to avoid degradation and loss of efficacy. Urea added as excipient did not accelerate degradation.

Objectives: Lenalidomide, a hazardous drug, has strict distribution controls. However, the risk of contamination with lenalidomide when patients take the drug has not been studied and the risk of drug exposure to people in the patient's living environment is unknown. Thus, we investigated the amount of lenalidomide that could be dispersed during the period between removal of the capsule and returning the used blister packages, and we considered the conditions under which lenalidomide could be dispersed and countermeasures.

Methods: The amount of lenalidomide contamination was measured on the outside of the unused blister packages returned by the patients, on the surface of the capsule, and on the inside of the package immediately after removal of the capsule. In addition, the amount of contamination was measured on the blister packages used by the patients and on the gloves worn by the pharmacists on receipt of the packages. Lenalidomide was analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Results: Lenalidomide amounts on the outside of the unused blister packages returned by the three patients were <10, <10, and 26.8 ng/pack, those on the capsule surface immediately after removal from the packages were 297, 388, and 297 ng/capsule, and those on the inside of packages immediately after removal of all capsules were 143, 184, and 554 ng/pack, respectively. A median of 15.6 ng/pack lenalidomide was detected on the surface of packages used by the patients (n=18). The lenalidomide remaining in the packages immediately after capsule removal (~200 ng/pack), except for the 15.6 ng/pack detected in the packages used by the patients, may have been dispersed in the patient's living environment (~90% or more). The maximum amount of lenalidomide on the surface of the packages used by the patients was over 2500 ng/pack.

Conclusions: The amount of lenalidomide contamination per package was found to be at least 100 ng less after collection by the pharmacist than immediately after removal of the capsules. Therefore, it is recommended to clean the surrounding area and wash one's hands after taking the capsules.

Introduction: Antibiotic use drives antibiotic resistance. The UK antimicrobial resistance (AMR) strategy aims to reduce antibiotic use. We aimed to quantify excess antibiotic use in a district general hospital in south-west England.

Methods: Medical patients discharged in August 2020 who had received antibiotics were included. An audit tool of antibiotic prescribing appropriateness was used to collect relevant clinical information regarding each patient case. The appropriateness of antibiotic use was then determined by two infection specialists and excess days of therapy (DOTs) calculated.

Results: 647 patients were discharged in August 2020. Of the 1658 antibiotic DOTs for the 184 patients reviewed, 403 (24%) were excess DOTs. The excess antibiotic DOTs were prescribed in 92 patients (50%); 112/403 (27.8%) excess DOTs originated at the initiation of antibiotic therapy (time point A); 184/403 (45.7%) of excess DOTs occurred at the antibiotic review pre-72 hours (time point B); and 107/403 (26.6%) of excess DOTs were due to protracted antibiotic courses (time point C).

Conclusion: 24% of antibiotic DOTs were deemed unnecessary. The greatest opportunity to reduce antibiotic use safely was the pre-72 hours antibiotic review, which may provide a target for reducing excess antimicrobial therapy in line with the national AMR strategy.

Objectives: Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive drug with a high potential for drug interactions that is frequently used in renal transplant patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the change in cyclosporine concentration in patients taking cyclosporine and lercanidipine concurrently.

Methods: The potential drug interactions in renal transplant patients who received lercanidipine and cyclosporine concurrently in a university hospital between January 2008 and January 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients had renal transplantation from deceased donors or living related donors. The Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS) criteria were used to assess the causality of cyclosporine and lercanidipine drug interaction.

Results: The study included six renal transplant patients. The median cyclosporine concentration before lercanidipine use was 325 ng/mL (min-max 101-356) and 592.5 ng/mL (min-max 198-799) thereafter (p=0.028). Serum creatinine and proteinuria levels did not change significantly during lercanidipine treatment (p=0.686 and p=0.116, respectively). According to the DIPS evaluation, cyclosporine and lercanidipine interaction was classified as "possible (score 3)".

Conclusions: Concomitant use of cyclosporine and lercanidipine increases the concentration of cyclosporine, which may result in side effects during effective treatment in renal transplant patients. Therefore, cyclosporine concentrations should definitely be monitored while patients are taking lercanidipine.

Objective: Pharmaceutical care is closely related to the outcome and prognosis of disease treatment. This study analyses the research status, hotspots, frontiers and development trends of pharmaceutical care from the perspective of bibliometrics.

Methods: Related literature on pharmaceutical care published in the Web of Science Core Collection database was collected and knowledge maps were drawn by science information visualisation software Citespace 6.1 .R3 and VOSviewer 1.6.17.0.

Results: A total of 3289 institutions from 105 countries/regions published 2906 papers in 669 academic journals, which were cited 50 027 times. The top three countries/regions by the number of publications are the USA, UK and Brazil. The top three institutions are Utrecht University and the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, and University College London in the UK. The top three journals are American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. The top three authors are Hersberger KE, Bouvy ML and Hughes CM. The most co-cited is Hepler CD, and the most co-cited influential is Strand LM. COVID-19 pandemic, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pharmacy practice are the most cutting edge topics in the field of research in pharmaceutical care. Pharmaceutical service and clinical pharmacy are research hotspots in pharmaceutical care.

Conclusion: In the past 10 years, papers in the field of pharmaceutical care have shown a significant growth trend and scholars have become increasingly interested in research on related content in the field of pharmaceutical care. Our research results are of great significance for improving the connotation construction of pharmaceutical care and improving patient satisfaction and prognosis, and can also be used as an important reference for relevant scholars to select scientific research topics for subsequent research. The objective basis for relevant government departments is to modify and formulate health policies or measures.

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important and life-threatening complication following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This is therefore an active research area with studies aiming to understand the factors that cause this complication.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study to identify the factors that caused AKI in 100 patients who underwent allo-HSCT in the first 100 days after transplantation using logistic regression analysis.

Results: The mean time of onset of AKI was 45.58 days (range 13-97) and the mean±SD maximum serum creatinine value was 1.53±0.78 mg/dL. In 47 patients, level 1 or higher AKI occurred in the first month of transplantation and 38 of these patients were diagnosed with a higher level of AKI 31-100 days after transplantation. According to multivariate analysis, use of cyclophosphamide (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 4.01, p=0.012), mean ciclosporin blood levels ≥250 ng/mL (AOR 2.81, p=0.022) and ciclosporin blood levels ≥450 ng/mL in the first month of transplantation (AOR 3.30, p=0.007) were found to be potential factors for early onset AKI. Ciclosporin blood levels exceeded 450 ng/mL in 35% of those using posaconazole and voriconazole during administration route change of ciclosporin. Use of ≥2 nephrotoxic anti-infective drugs (AOR 3, p=0.026) and developing AKI in the first month of transplantation (AOR 4.14, p=0.002) were found to be potential factors in the development of advanced AKI.

Conclusion: Nephrotoxic drugs, cyclophosphamide use and ciclosporin blood levels are factors to be considered to prevent the development of AKI in patients undergoing allo-HSCT.

Objective: 24-hour urine creatinine clearance (ClCr 24 hours) remains the gold standard for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in critically ill patients; however, simpler methods are commonly used in clinical practice. Serum creatinine (SCr) is the most frequently used biomarker to estimate GFR; and cystatin C, another biomarker, has been shown to reflect GFR changes earlier than SCr. We assess the performance of equations based on SCr, cystatin C and their combination (SCr-Cyst C) for estimating GFR in critically ill patients.

Methods: Observational unicentric study in a tertiary care hospital. Patients with cystatin C, SCr and ClCr 24 hours measurements in ±2 days admitted to an intensive care unit were included. ClCr 24 hours was considered the reference method. GFR was estimated using SCr-based equations: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration based on creatinine (CKD-EPI-Cr) and Cockcroft-Gault (CG); cystatin C-based equations: CKD-EPI-CystC and CAPA; and Cr-CystC-based equations: CKD-EPI-Cr-CystC. Performance of each equation was assessed by calculating bias and precision, and Bland-Altman plots were built. Further analysis was performed with stratified data into CrCl 24 hours <60, 60-130 and ≥130 mL/min/1.73 m².

Results: We included 275 measurements, corresponding to 186 patients. In the overall population, the CKD-EPI-Cr equation showed the lowest bias (2.6) and best precision (33.1). In patients with CrCl 24 hours <60 mL/min/1.73 m², cystatin-C-based equations showed the lowest bias (<3.0) and CKD-EPI-Cr-CystC was the most accurate (13.6). In the subgroup of 60≤ CrCl 24 hours <130mL/min/1.73 m², CKD-EPI-Cr-CystC was the most precise (20.9). However, in patients with CrCl 24 hours ≥130mL/min/1.73 m², cystatin C-based equations underestimated GFR, while CG overestimated it (22.7).

Conclusions: Our study showed no evidence of superiority of any equation over the others for all evaluated parameters: bias, precision and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. Cystatin C-based equations were less biased in individuals with impaired renal function (GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²). CKD-EPI-Cr-CystC performed properly in patients with GFR from 60-130 mL/min/1.73 m² and none of them were accurate enough in patients ≥130 mL/min/1.73 m².

Objectives: Anticancer drug preparation control is essential to ensure quality and patient safety. Drugcam (Eurekam Company) is a digital video-assisted control system based on artificial intelligence methods to identify vials used and volumes withdrawn. As for any control system, qualification is required before use in a chemotherapy compounding unit (CCU).

Methods: We conducted an operational qualification (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy assessment of vials and volumes recognition and quantitative analysis of measured volumes) and a performance qualification (comparison with visual control) of Drugcam in our CCU, as well as an impact study on compounding time and compound supply time.

Results: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of vials (94%, 98% and 96%, respectively) and volumes (86%, 96% and 91%, respectively) recognition are satisfactory. It depends on both the object presented and the camera tested. False positives, which could lead to release of non-compliant preparation, were detected. Volume reading errors may exceed the tolerance threshold of ±5% for small volumes. Drugcam did not significantly lengthen compounding time and compound supply time.

Conclusions: No recommendations for a qualification method of this new type of control equipment exist. However, a qualification process is essential to understand tool limitations and integrate them into the CCU risk management system. Drugcam enables anticancer drug preparation to be secure and is also useful for initial and continuous staff training.

We present the case of a patient with failed desensitisation to paclitaxel that was ultimately successful with omalizumab treatment. Our patient, a female aged between 20-25 and diagnosed with a triple negative breast cancer, received first-line treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel. During the second cycle of paclitaxel, she experienced heat, dyspnoea, facial angioedema and vomiting. Skin tests for allergic reactions returned negative results, and drug provocation tests showed a positive result (anaphylaxis). Rapid drug desensitisation (RDD) was carried out with two bags of dilutions but at the beginning of the infusion, the patient experienced symptoms again, so the infusion was stopped. Therefore, the use of omalizumab, already reported as a successful adjuvant in desensitisation to other drugs, was considered. The anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody was administered off-label before the first programmed desensitisation with success: total dose of paclitaxel was infused without any reaction. The patient was able to receive the complete chemotherapy treatment.