Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy最新文献

Objectives: The prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) and cardiovascular disease are increasing and both conditions share similar risk factors. We investigated the association between OA and receipt of invasive managements and clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample, adjusted binary logistic regression determined the association between OA and each outcome variable.

Results: Of 6,561,940 AMI hospitalizations, 6.3% had OA. OA patients were older and more likely to be female. OA was associated with a decreased odds of coronary angiography (adjusted odds ratio 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.90, 0.92), PCI (0.87; 0.87, 0.88), and coronary artery bypass grafting (0.98; 0.97, 1.00). OA was associated with a decreased odds of adverse outcomes (in-hospital mortality: 0.68; 0.67, 0.69; major acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events: 0.71; 0.70, 0.72; all-cause bleeding: 0.76; 0.74, 0.77; and stroke/TIA: 0.84; 0.82, 0.87).

Conclusions: This study of a representative sample of the US population highlights that OA patients are less likely to be offered invasive interventions following AMI. OA was also associated with better outcomes post-AMI, possibly attributed to a misclassification bias where unwell patients with OA were less likely to receive an OA code because codes for serious illness took precedence.

Introduction: The evidence supporting the cardiovascular health benefits of physical activity and/or exercise training is well-established. While the role of physical activity in primary prevention is unequivocal, its significance in secondary prevention (among those with preexisting cardiovascular disease) is less definitive. Though guidelines universally recommend physical activity as part of the secondary preventive strategy, the empirical evidence underpinning these recommendations is not as robust as that for primary prevention.

Areas covered: This review distills the body of available observational and interventional evidence on the relationship between physical activity, exercise, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes among those with preexisting cardiovascular disease. The postulated biologic mechanisms underlying the relationships, areas of prevailing uncertainty, and potential public health implications are also discussed.

Expert opinion: A physical activity level of 500 MET-min/week (equivalent to 150 min of moderate-intensity physical activity or 75 min of vigorous-intensity physical activity or an equivalent combination) may be a minimum requirement for patients with preexisting CVD. However, to reap the maximum benefits of physical activity and also minimize adverse effects, physical activity and/or exercise regimens should be tailored to unique factors such as individual's baseline physical activity habits, cardiovascular health status and the specific nature of their cardiovascular disease.

Introduction: Older adults form a fast-increasing proportion of the world population. However, gains in increasing quantity of life have not been accompanied by similar gains in quality of life. Older people frequently experience frailty, memory problems, and chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and neurodegenerative diseases. Recent trials have demonstrated the efficacy of anti-hypertensive therapy in older populations but failed to show benefits for aspirin.

Area covered: Statins clearly reduce CVD events in middle-aged populations. There seems to be evidence that the effect is similar in primary prevention older populations based on meta-analyses mainly from sub-groups in large trials, but this becomes less clear with increasing age. However, given differences in drug metabolism and possibly efficacy, competing co-morbidities, their effects on mortality, disability, and dementia in this age group remain to be determined.

Expert opinion: Two large trials are now underway to clarify the role of statin therapy in people aged over 70 years using endpoints of mortality, disability, and neurocognitive endpoints as well as standard cardiovascular disease outcomes. They may provide also provide more evidence on how to approach the over 80 year age group.

Introduction: Recognition and evaluation of structural heart disease has become more common in clinical practice and will continue to grow as the population ages. With the growing availability of surgical and transcatheter interventional options, appropriate evaluation and patient selection for therapy is required. While echocardiography can frequently provide the required anatomic and hemodynamic information required to guide therapeutic decisions, there remains subsets of patients in which noninvasive testing yields inconclusive results prompting the need for invasive hemodynamics.

Areas covered: This article reviews the indications and strengths of invasive hemodynamics in a variety of structural heart diseases. We describe the utilization and benefits of continuous hemodynamics during transcatheter interventions and review the prognostic information that can be gleaned from changes in hemodynamics after intervention.

Expert opinion: The advancement of transcatheter therapies for structural heart disease has sparked a renewed interest in the utilization of invasive hemodynamics. Continued growth and accessibility of comprehensive hemodynamics for clinical practice will rely on clinicians to continually review, refine, and develop procedural techniques beyond the current training standards in order to further advance the field.

Introduction: Impella devices have emerged as a critical tool for temporary mechanical circulatory support (TMCS) in the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The purpose of this review is to examine the history of the different Impella devices, their hemodynamic profiles, and how the data supports their use.

Areas covered: This review covers the development and specifications of the Impella 2.5, Impella CP, Impella 5.0/Left Direct (LD), Impella RP, and Impella 5.5 devices. This review also covers the clinical trials that illuminate the Impella devices' use in their appropriate clinical contexts. These studies examine the effectiveness of Impella devices and have begun to yield promising results, demonstrating improved survival rates when compared to the historically high mortality rates associated with CS. It is important to weigh the benefits of Impella devices in light of their contraindications. A literature search was conducted by searching the PubMed database for reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials pertinent to Impella devices.

Expert opinion: Impella devices are a crucial tool for management of patients undergoing high-risk PCI and those with CS. There is evidence that early Impella implantation is beneficial in the treatment of patients presenting with CS. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to better elucidate the benefits of Impella devices in various clinical settings.

Introduction: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor is a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Current international guidelines recommend the use of 12 months of DAPT with newer P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (i.e. ticagrelor or prasugrel) as first-line therapy in this setting. However, intense and prolonged DAPT regimens are associated with an increased risk of bleeding, with relevant prognostic implications. Recently, a strategy of de-escalation of P2Y₁₂ inhibitors has been proposed as an alternative to conventional DAPT to mitigate the risk of bleeding while preserving ischemic protection after ACS.

Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the available evidence on guided and unguided strategies for P2Y₁₂ inhibitor de-escalation in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

Expert opinion: Among patients with ACS, guided and unguided de-escalation strategies are safe and effective for secondary cardiovascular prevention. Although the implementation of genetic and platelet function tests is of interest for treatment personalization, the routine use of guided de-escalation strategies seems impractical. In this context, unguided de-escalation approaches appear more attractive, convenient, and suitable for contemporary practice.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) cannot be considered an isolated disease. Patients with AF should be managed using a comprehensive approach that is not limited to stroke prevention.

Areas covered: In this manuscript, the potential role of AF as a vascular disease that is managed as part of a holistic approach was reviewed.

Expert opinion: The residual risk of stroke in patients with AF reaches 1-2% annually, despite appropriate anticoagulation therapy. Additionally, patients with AF may develop cognitive impairment through stroke-independent pathways. Furthermore, patients with AF may have a higher risk of developing atherosclerotic vascular disease in various vascular beds and chronic kidney disease; conversely, patients with atherosclerotic disease may have an increased risk of developing AF. AF should be considered a truly systemic vascular disease, since it brings together several hemodynamic and systemic changes, including inflammation, oxidative stress, activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic systems, as well as a prothrombotic state and endothelial dysfunction. In this regard, patients with AF should be treated based on a holistic approach that is not limited to oral anticoagulation but includes complete vascular protection.