Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-12DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2544816
Vincenzo De Sio, Felice Gragnano, Arturo Cesaro, Elisabetta Moscarella, Natale Guarnaccia, Antonio Capolongo, Pasquale Maddaluna, Giuseppe Verde, Vincenzo Acerbo, Gianmaria Scherillo, Pierre Sabouret, Daniele Giacoppo, Mattia Galli, Giuseppe Gargiulo, Giovanni Esposito, Marco Valgimigli, Dominick J Angiolillo, Paolo Calabrò
Introduction: Cangrelor is the only parenteral P2Y12 receptor antagonist currently recommended for the prevention of periprocedural thrombotic complications in P2Y12 inhibitor-naïve patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Areas covered: This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the pharmacological properties and administration strategies of cangrelor in PCI, summarizes the latest evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies, and discusses potential future directions for its application in clinical practice. Literature search was conducted using PubMed up to May 2025.
Expert opinion: Cangrelor provides rapid platelet inhibition following an intravenous bolus, and its short half-life ensures predictable pharmacokinetic profile, facilitating perioperative management. The CHAMPION program demonstrated that cangrelor significantly reduces early ischemic events, including myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing PCI. Since its approval, several clinical trials and observational studies have further evaluated the efficacy and safety of cangrelor and its optimal use. The adoption of cangrelor in catheterization laboratories worldwide remains inconsistent, with misuse being frequently reported. Drug-related costs along with concerns surrounding drug interaction when switching to oral P2Y12 inhibitors, limited safety data in high-risk populations and lack of evidence on the comparison against ticagrelor or prasugrel may contribute to its restricted utilization in clinical practice.
{"title":"Cangrelor in percutaneous coronary interventions: advances in evidence, clinical applications, and future directions.","authors":"Vincenzo De Sio, Felice Gragnano, Arturo Cesaro, Elisabetta Moscarella, Natale Guarnaccia, Antonio Capolongo, Pasquale Maddaluna, Giuseppe Verde, Vincenzo Acerbo, Gianmaria Scherillo, Pierre Sabouret, Daniele Giacoppo, Mattia Galli, Giuseppe Gargiulo, Giovanni Esposito, Marco Valgimigli, Dominick J Angiolillo, Paolo Calabrò","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2544816","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2544816","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cangrelor is the only parenteral P2Y<sub>12</sub> receptor antagonist currently recommended for the prevention of periprocedural thrombotic complications in P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor-naïve patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the pharmacological properties and administration strategies of cangrelor in PCI, summarizes the latest evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies, and discusses potential future directions for its application in clinical practice. Literature search was conducted using PubMed up to May 2025.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Cangrelor provides rapid platelet inhibition following an intravenous bolus, and its short half-life ensures predictable pharmacokinetic profile, facilitating perioperative management. The CHAMPION program demonstrated that cangrelor significantly reduces early ischemic events, including myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing PCI. Since its approval, several clinical trials and observational studies have further evaluated the efficacy and safety of cangrelor and its optimal use. The adoption of cangrelor in catheterization laboratories worldwide remains inconsistent, with misuse being frequently reported. Drug-related costs along with concerns surrounding drug interaction when switching to oral P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitors, limited safety data in high-risk populations and lack of evidence on the comparison against ticagrelor or prasugrel may contribute to its restricted utilization in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"507-519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144803923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-16DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2544817
Tamer Jamal, Elizabeth H Stephens, Nathan Taggart, M Yasir Qureshi, Elena A Swan, Jeffrey R Weatherhead, Joseph A Dearani
Introduction: Ebstein anomaly (EA) is a rare congenital heart defect with a broad spectrum of severity - both anatomically and clinically. Treatment options have evolved and hence the rationale for this review.
Areas covered: This manuscript reviews all of the current literature including the recent expert consensus document that describes the updated diagnostic and treatment strategies. A citation search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed using key words related to EA. The search was restricted to the English language and the years 1990 to present.
Expert opinion: The expert commentary is a summary of the 2 most recent expert consensus documents and also pros and fit pitfalls based on the authors institutional experience which is the largest in the world.
Ebstein异常(EA)是一种罕见的先天性心脏缺陷,具有广泛的严重程度-解剖学和临床。治疗方案已经发展,因此本综述的基本原理。涵盖领域:本文回顾了所有当前文献,包括最近的专家共识文件,描述了最新的诊断和治疗策略。使用与EA相关的关键词在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science中进行引文检索。检索仅限于英语和1990年至今的年份。专家意见:专家评论是对最近两份专家共识文件的总结,也是基于作者机构经验的优点和适合缺陷,这是世界上最大的。
{"title":"Ebstein anomaly update: the evolution of care and the revolution of surgical strategy.","authors":"Tamer Jamal, Elizabeth H Stephens, Nathan Taggart, M Yasir Qureshi, Elena A Swan, Jeffrey R Weatherhead, Joseph A Dearani","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2544817","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2544817","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ebstein anomaly (EA) is a rare congenital heart defect with a broad spectrum of severity - both anatomically and clinically. Treatment options have evolved and hence the rationale for this review.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This manuscript reviews all of the current literature including the recent expert consensus document that describes the updated diagnostic and treatment strategies. A citation search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed using key words related to EA. The search was restricted to the English language and the years 1990 to present.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The expert commentary is a summary of the 2 most recent expert consensus documents and also pros and fit pitfalls based on the authors institutional experience which is the largest in the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"493-505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144854970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-14DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2544812
Rafael C O Santos, Isabela M Bensenor, Paulo A Lotufo, Alessandra C Goulart, Flávia L Daher, Antonio C P Lima, Itamar S Santos
Background: Compliance of prescriptions with treatment guidelines (CPTG) after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is poorly studied. We studied CPTG index levels in ERICO cohort over three years and its association with long-term mortality.
Research design and methods: We analyzed data from 961 ERICO participants who were discharged after an ACS event. Medication information was obtained at discharge, 30 days 180 days, and yearly after the index event. The CPTG index was defined as the proportion of evidence-based medications for post-ACS care (anti-platelets, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers, and statins), a patient's prescription had. We verified the association between CPTG index and survival using adjusted Cox regression.
Results: The median age was 62 years, and 41% were female. At 30 days, the proportion of individuals with CPTG index = 1.0 decreased to the lowest values observed (23.4%), followed by a partial recovery (40.1% at 180 days). CPTG index was significantly associated with better survival (Hazard Ratio for a 0.1-point increase: 0.92; 95% confidence interval:0.87-0.96).
Conclusions: The CPTG index was significantly associated with long-term survival. The expressive drop in CPTG index values 30 days after discharge suggests that targeted actions might be necessary to ensure timely healthcare access in this population.
{"title":"The association between the compliance of prescriptions with treatment guidelines and long-term survival after acute coronary syndrome: results from the ERICO study.","authors":"Rafael C O Santos, Isabela M Bensenor, Paulo A Lotufo, Alessandra C Goulart, Flávia L Daher, Antonio C P Lima, Itamar S Santos","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2544812","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2544812","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compliance of prescriptions with treatment guidelines (CPTG) after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is poorly studied. We studied CPTG index levels in ERICO cohort over three years and its association with long-term mortality.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 961 ERICO participants who were discharged after an ACS event. Medication information was obtained at discharge, 30 days 180 days, and yearly after the index event. The CPTG index was defined as the proportion of evidence-based medications for post-ACS care (anti-platelets, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers, and statins), a patient's prescription had. We verified the association between CPTG index and survival using adjusted Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 62 years, and 41% were female. At 30 days, the proportion of individuals with CPTG index = 1.0 decreased to the lowest values observed (23.4%), followed by a partial recovery (40.1% at 180 days). CPTG index was significantly associated with better survival (Hazard Ratio for a 0.1-point increase: 0.92; 95% confidence interval:0.87-0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CPTG index was significantly associated with long-term survival. The expressive drop in CPTG index values 30 days after discharge suggests that targeted actions might be necessary to ensure timely healthcare access in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"577-583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144798568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-22DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2549018
Michail Penteris, Konstantinos Lampropoulos
Introduction: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety, early and late mortality, morbidity and long-term function of the tricuspid valve (TV) following tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) compared to surgical tricuspid valve (TV) repair/replacement (TVR) for tricuspid regurgitation (TR).
Methods: This review investigates through two different databases for original studies that evaluated patients with TR who underwent either T-TEER or TVR was until December 2024. The outcomes of interest were safety, morbidity, mortality and long-term function following T-TEER vs TVR.
Results: We identified three retrospective observational studies, including a total of 1612 patients with TR. Short-term (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13-1.04; p = 0.06) and long-term mortality was similar between T-TEER and TVR. There was a lower risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.23-0.43; p < 0.00001) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.10-0.35; p < 0.00001) with T-TEER, while there was no significant difference in terms of stroke events (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.68-2.01; p = 0.58) and risk of bleeding (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.45-1.44; p = 0.47) compared to TVR.
Conclusions: In conclusion, T-TEER appears to have a comparable safety profile to TVR with a lower risk of AKI and PPI. However, these findings are based on limited observational data and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than conclusive.
Registration: This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42024622555).
通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,比较三尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修复(T-TEER)与手术三尖瓣修复/置换(TVR)治疗三尖瓣反流(TR)的安全性、早期和晚期死亡率、发病率和长期功能。方法:本综述通过两个不同的原始研究数据库进行调查,这些研究评估了截至2024年12月接受T-TEER或TVR治疗的TR患者。关注的结果是T-TEER与TVR的安全性、发病率、死亡率和长期功能。结果:我们纳入了3项回顾性观察性研究,共纳入1612例TR患者。T-TEER和TVR的短期(OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13-1.04; p = 0.06)和长期死亡率相似。与TVR相比,急性肾损伤(AKI)的风险(OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.23-0.43; p p p = 0.58)和出血风险(OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.45-1.44; p = 0.47)较低。结论:总之,T-TEER似乎具有与TVR相当的安全性,AKI和PPI的风险更低。然而,这些发现是基于有限的观测数据,应该被解释为假设产生,而不是结论性的。注册:该系统评价和荟萃分析已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO; CRD42024622555)上前瞻性注册。
{"title":"Tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair versus surgery for tricuspid regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Michail Penteris, Konstantinos Lampropoulos","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2549018","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2549018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety, early and late mortality, morbidity and long-term function of the tricuspid valve (TV) following tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) compared to surgical tricuspid valve (TV) repair/replacement (TVR) for tricuspid regurgitation (TR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review investigates through two different databases for original studies that evaluated patients with TR who underwent either T-TEER or TVR was until December 2024. The outcomes of interest were safety, morbidity, mortality and long-term function following T-TEER vs TVR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three retrospective observational studies, including a total of 1612 patients with TR. Short-term (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13-1.04; <i>p</i> = 0.06) and long-term mortality was similar between T-TEER and TVR. There was a lower risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.23-0.43; <i>p</i> < 0.00001) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.10-0.35; <i>p</i> < 0.00001) with T-TEER, while there was no significant difference in terms of stroke events (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.68-2.01; <i>p</i> = 0.58) and risk of bleeding (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.45-1.44; <i>p</i> = 0.47) compared to TVR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, T-TEER appears to have a comparable safety profile to TVR with a lower risk of AKI and PPI. However, these findings are based on limited observational data and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than conclusive.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42024622555).</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":"23 9","pages":"567-575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144948029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-08DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2544824
Masashi Fujino, Teruo Noguchi
{"title":"What is the importance of understanding heart disease causes in nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy for left ventricular thrombus patients?","authors":"Masashi Fujino, Teruo Noguchi","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2544824","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2544824","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"485-488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144783873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-27DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2543537
Göran Walldius
Introduction: Hypercholesterolemia and other dyslipidemias are common risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and development of atherosclerosis. International guidelines recommend LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apoB under some conditions for clinical use in evaluating risk of CVD. In part 1 of this review newer risk factor data for apoA-1, and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio is presented for cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, diabetes and other CVD manifestations of atherosclerosis. Compared to conventional lipids, these apolipoproteins add strong clinical risk information for these CVD disorders and for a range of other diseases.
Areas covered: Prospective studies, reviews, meta-analyses, case control, nested-case and therapeutic studies are analyzed. Searches were conducted with Google and in PubMed, and CVD journals for peer-reviewed publications. In part 2 of this review newer risk factor data for apoA-1, and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio is presented for atherosclerotic plaques, HDL-C versus apoA-1, inflammatory diseases, cancer, and metastases.
Expert opinion: Associations between apoB, apoA-1 and especially the apoB/apoA-1 ratio and development of atherosclerosis related risk of multiple CVD diseases have been documented world-wide. This data indicates that the balance, i.e. the ratio between the atherogenic apoB and the protective apoA-1, significantly improves risk evaluation and prediction of CVD, hence calling for an update of guidelines.
{"title":"High apoB/apoA-1 ratio is a strong risk predictor of major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events part 1: a review basis for updating guidelines.","authors":"Göran Walldius","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2543537","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2543537","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypercholesterolemia and other dyslipidemias are common risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and development of atherosclerosis. International guidelines recommend LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apoB under some conditions for clinical use in evaluating risk of CVD. In part 1 of this review newer risk factor data for apoA-1, and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio is presented for cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, diabetes and other CVD manifestations of atherosclerosis. Compared to conventional lipids, these apolipoproteins add strong clinical risk information for these CVD disorders and for a range of other diseases.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Prospective studies, reviews, meta-analyses, case control, nested-case and therapeutic studies are analyzed. Searches were conducted with Google and in PubMed, and CVD journals for peer-reviewed publications. In part 2 of this review newer risk factor data for apoA-1, and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio is presented for atherosclerotic plaques, HDL-C versus apoA-1, inflammatory diseases, cancer, and metastases.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Associations between apoB, apoA-1 and especially the apoB/apoA-1 ratio and development of atherosclerosis related risk of multiple CVD diseases have been documented world-wide. This data indicates that the balance, i.e. the ratio between the atherogenic apoB and the protective apoA-1, significantly improves risk evaluation and prediction of CVD, hence calling for an update of guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"521-545"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144798566","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-08DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2543535
Göran Walldius
Introduction: Hypercholesterolemia and other dyslipidemias are common risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and development of atherosclerosis. International guidelines recommend LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB under some conditions for clinical use in evaluating risk of CVD. In part 2 of this review, newer risk factor data for apoA-1, and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio is presented for atherosclerotic plaques, HDL-C versus apoA-1, inflammatory diseases, cancer, and metastases. Compared to conventional lipids, these apolipoproteins add strong clinical risk information for these CVD disorders and for a range of other diseases.
Areas covered: Prospective studies, reviews, meta-analyses, case control, nested-case, and therapeutic studies are analyzed. Searches were conducted with Google and in PubMed, and CVD journals for peer-reviewed publications. In part 1 of this review, newer risk factor data for apoA-1 and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio are presented for cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, diabetes, and other CVD manifestations of atherosclerosis.
Expert opinion: Strong associations between apoB, apoA-1 and especially the apoB/apoA-1 ratio and development of atherosclerosis-related risk of multiple CVD diseases have been documented world-wide. These data indicate that the balance, i.e. the ratio between the atherogenic apoB and the protective apoA-1, significantly improves risk evaluation and prediction of CVD, hence calling for an update of guidelines.
{"title":"High apoB/apoA-1 ratio is a strong risk predictor of major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events part 2: a review basis for updating guidelines.","authors":"Göran Walldius","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2543535","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2543535","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypercholesterolemia and other dyslipidemias are common risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and development of atherosclerosis. International guidelines recommend LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB under some conditions for clinical use in evaluating risk of CVD. In part 2 of this review, newer risk factor data for apoA-1, and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio is presented for atherosclerotic plaques, HDL-C versus apoA-1, inflammatory diseases, cancer, and metastases. Compared to conventional lipids, these apolipoproteins add strong clinical risk information for these CVD disorders and for a range of other diseases.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Prospective studies, reviews, meta-analyses, case control, nested-case, and therapeutic studies are analyzed. Searches were conducted with Google and in PubMed, and CVD journals for peer-reviewed publications. In part 1 of this review, newer risk factor data for apoA-1 and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio are presented for cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, diabetes, and other CVD manifestations of atherosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Strong associations between apoB, apoA-1 and especially the apoB/apoA-1 ratio and development of atherosclerosis-related risk of multiple CVD diseases have been documented world-wide. These data indicate that the balance, i.e. the <b>ratio</b> between the atherogenic apoB and the protective apoA-1, significantly improves risk evaluation and prediction of CVD, hence calling for an update of guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"547-566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144798567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2549016
Tomasz Urbanowicz
{"title":"Long-term exposure to air pollution and coronary atherosclerosis: understanding the correlation.","authors":"Tomasz Urbanowicz","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2549016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2025.2549016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":"23 9","pages":"489-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144948055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: With the substantial increase in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) usage, prescribers face complex decisions regarding the appropriate agent selection. This scoping review aimed to identify factors influencing oral anticoagulant choice in clinical practice over time.
Methods: Four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for quantitative observational studies on patients prescribed DOACs for any indication, focusing on factors affecting OAC choice. Studies published from January 2010 to March 2023 were included.
Results: Of the 4659 identified studies, 60 met selection criteria. Most (96%) examined the choice between DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKA); while (15%) evaluated factors affecting choice among DOACs. Age and gender were included in 77% and 70% of studies, respectively. Renal impairment (58%), heart failure (48%), previous stroke (43%), and thromboembolic risk (43%) were also commonly assessed. Older age had a significant negative association with DOAC prescribing in (50%) of the studies; renal impairment reduced DOAC initiation, favoring warfarin in (94%).
Conclusions: Several significant key factors were identified as being associated with OAC choice, including demographic factors such as age, and clinical factors such as kidney function, prior stroke, and other comorbidities. Significant factors in the choice among DOACs were advanced age, and renal impairment.
Registration: This systematic review was registered as a PURE protocol (https://pureportal.strath.ac.uk/en/projects/factors-associated-with-the-prescribing-of-direct-acting-oral-ant).
导论:随着直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)使用量的大幅增加,处方医师面临着关于适当药物选择的复杂决策。本综述旨在确定临床实践中影响口服抗凝剂选择的因素。方法:检索Medline、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science等4个数据库,对任意适应症患者使用doac进行定量观察研究,重点关注影响OAC选择的因素。纳入了2010年1月至2023年3月发表的研究。结果:4659项研究中,60项符合选择标准。大多数(96%)检查DOACs和维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)之间的选择;而(15%)评估影响doac选择的因素。年龄和性别分别被纳入77%和70%的研究。肾功能损害(58%)、心力衰竭(48%)、既往中风(43%)和血栓栓塞风险(43%)也常被评估。在50%的研究中,年龄较大与DOAC处方呈显著负相关;肾功能损害降低DOAC起始,华法林更有利(94%)。结论:确定了与OAC选择相关的几个重要关键因素,包括人口因素(如年龄)和临床因素(如肾功能、既往卒中和其他合并症)。高龄和肾功能损害是影响DOACs选择的重要因素。注册:本系统评价注册为PURE方案(https://pureportal.strath.ac.uk/en/projects/factors-associated-with-the-prescribing-of-direct-acting-oral-ant)。
{"title":"A scoping review of factors associated with the prescribing choice of direct oral anticoagulant drugs.","authors":"Hanan Abunimeh, Solafa NoorSaeed, Rahaf Alkhlaifat, Amanj Kurdi, Tanja Mueller","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2536043","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2536043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the substantial increase in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) usage, prescribers face complex decisions regarding the appropriate agent selection. This scoping review aimed to identify factors influencing oral anticoagulant choice in clinical practice over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for quantitative observational studies on patients prescribed DOACs for any indication, focusing on factors affecting OAC choice. Studies published from January 2010 to March 2023 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4659 identified studies, 60 met selection criteria. Most (96%) examined the choice between DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKA); while (15%) evaluated factors affecting choice among DOACs. Age and gender were included in 77% and 70% of studies, respectively. Renal impairment (58%), heart failure (48%), previous stroke (43%), and thromboembolic risk (43%) were also commonly assessed. Older age had a significant negative association with DOAC prescribing in (50%) of the studies; renal impairment reduced DOAC initiation, favoring warfarin in (94%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several significant key factors were identified as being associated with OAC choice, including demographic factors such as age, and clinical factors such as kidney function, prior stroke, and other comorbidities. Significant factors in the choice among DOACs were advanced age, and renal impairment.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This systematic review was registered as a PURE protocol (https://pureportal.strath.ac.uk/en/projects/factors-associated-with-the-prescribing-of-direct-acting-oral-ant).</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"427-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144648924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: In-stent calcification is recognized as a significant contributor to unfavorable clinical outcomes. Understanding the various types and underlying mechanisms of in-stent calcification can help interventional operators to make decisions.
Areas covered: This review will describe the distinct types of in-stent calcification, which are categorized into in-stent smooth calcification and in-stent calcified nodule. The mechanisms and characteristics of in-stent smooth calcification and calcified nodule will be summarized. Given the differences between these two types, treatment approaches will be discussed. This review will focus on histopathology and intracoronary imaging. For the purpose of this review, evidence was gathered from electronic literature searches via PubMed, with a particular focus on primary evidence published in the last 5 years.
Expert opinion: Several treatment devices are available such as conventional balloon, modified balloon, atherectomy device, and intravascular lithotripsy. In-stent smooth calcification and calcified nodule might result in different clinical courses after repeated target lesion revascularization. Understanding the mechanisms with the various types of in-stent calcification may assist operators in selecting appropriate treatment strategies.
{"title":"Clinical differences among types of in-stent calcifications in coronary arteries: how can this be better managed?","authors":"Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Kenichi Sakakura, Hideo Fujita","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2534715","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2534715","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In-stent calcification is recognized as a significant contributor to unfavorable clinical outcomes. Understanding the various types and underlying mechanisms of in-stent calcification can help interventional operators to make decisions.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review will describe the distinct types of in-stent calcification, which are categorized into in-stent smooth calcification and in-stent calcified nodule. The mechanisms and characteristics of in-stent smooth calcification and calcified nodule will be summarized. Given the differences between these two types, treatment approaches will be discussed. This review will focus on histopathology and intracoronary imaging. For the purpose of this review, evidence was gathered from electronic literature searches via PubMed, with a particular focus on primary evidence published in the last 5 years.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Several treatment devices are available such as conventional balloon, modified balloon, atherectomy device, and intravascular lithotripsy. In-stent smooth calcification and calcified nodule might result in different clinical courses after repeated target lesion revascularization. Understanding the mechanisms with the various types of in-stent calcification may assist operators in selecting appropriate treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"377-388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144616931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}