Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-08DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2543535
Göran Walldius
Introduction: Hypercholesterolemia and other dyslipidemias are common risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and development of atherosclerosis. International guidelines recommend LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB under some conditions for clinical use in evaluating risk of CVD. In part 2 of this review, newer risk factor data for apoA-1, and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio is presented for atherosclerotic plaques, HDL-C versus apoA-1, inflammatory diseases, cancer, and metastases. Compared to conventional lipids, these apolipoproteins add strong clinical risk information for these CVD disorders and for a range of other diseases.
Areas covered: Prospective studies, reviews, meta-analyses, case control, nested-case, and therapeutic studies are analyzed. Searches were conducted with Google and in PubMed, and CVD journals for peer-reviewed publications. In part 1 of this review, newer risk factor data for apoA-1 and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio are presented for cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, diabetes, and other CVD manifestations of atherosclerosis.
Expert opinion: Strong associations between apoB, apoA-1 and especially the apoB/apoA-1 ratio and development of atherosclerosis-related risk of multiple CVD diseases have been documented world-wide. These data indicate that the balance, i.e. the ratio between the atherogenic apoB and the protective apoA-1, significantly improves risk evaluation and prediction of CVD, hence calling for an update of guidelines.
{"title":"High apoB/apoA-1 ratio is a strong risk predictor of major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events part 2: a review basis for updating guidelines.","authors":"Göran Walldius","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2543535","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2543535","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypercholesterolemia and other dyslipidemias are common risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and development of atherosclerosis. International guidelines recommend LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB under some conditions for clinical use in evaluating risk of CVD. In part 2 of this review, newer risk factor data for apoA-1, and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio is presented for atherosclerotic plaques, HDL-C versus apoA-1, inflammatory diseases, cancer, and metastases. Compared to conventional lipids, these apolipoproteins add strong clinical risk information for these CVD disorders and for a range of other diseases.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Prospective studies, reviews, meta-analyses, case control, nested-case, and therapeutic studies are analyzed. Searches were conducted with Google and in PubMed, and CVD journals for peer-reviewed publications. In part 1 of this review, newer risk factor data for apoA-1 and the apoB/apoA-1 ratio are presented for cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, diabetes, and other CVD manifestations of atherosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Strong associations between apoB, apoA-1 and especially the apoB/apoA-1 ratio and development of atherosclerosis-related risk of multiple CVD diseases have been documented world-wide. These data indicate that the balance, i.e. the <b>ratio</b> between the atherogenic apoB and the protective apoA-1, significantly improves risk evaluation and prediction of CVD, hence calling for an update of guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"547-566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144798567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2549016
Tomasz Urbanowicz
{"title":"Long-term exposure to air pollution and coronary atherosclerosis: understanding the correlation.","authors":"Tomasz Urbanowicz","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2549016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2025.2549016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":"23 9","pages":"489-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144948055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a critical vascular emergency marked by a sudden reduction in blood flow to the limb, significantly increasing amputation risk. Revascularization outcomes in urban versus rural areas have not been examined.
Research design and methods: The National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2021 identified patients with ALI who underwent revascularization. Propensity score matching compared outcomes, analyzed using STATA version 18.
Results: Of 85,760 hospitalizations for ALI receiving percutaneous revascularization 81,880 (95.5%) were in urban centers and 3,880 (4.5%) in rural facilities. Patients in urban hospitals showed higher mortality (4% vs. 2.7%), myocardial infarction (MI) (3.4% vs. 2.7%), cardiogenic shock (1.6% vs. 0.6%), cardiac arrest (6.5% vs. 5.9%), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (7.5% vs. 5.3%), mechanical circulatory support (1.1% vs. 0.5%), and acute kidney injury (18.5% vs. 15.4%). However, urban patients had lower intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (3.4% vs. 6.5%), major amputation (6.3% vs. 7.8%), fasciotomy (1.8% vs. 2.2%), and major adverse limb events (MALE) (46.4% vs. 49.1%), with a significant difference of p < 0.01 compared to rural hospitals.
Conclusions: Urban hospitals in the United States report elevated mortality rates and significant cardiovascular events in comparison to their rural counterparts.
{"title":"Cardiovascular and periprocedural outcomes of endovascular intervention for acute limb ischemia at experienced urban versus rural centers in the US: national inpatient sample analysis 2016-2021.","authors":"Yasar Sattar, Adishwar Rao, Sivaram Neppala, Himaja Dutt Chigurupati, Waleed Alruwaili, Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk, Fadi Saab, Jihad Mustapha, Abdullah Naveed Muhammad, Ramesh Daggubati, Akram Kawsara","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2527707","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2527707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a critical vascular emergency marked by a sudden reduction in blood flow to the limb, significantly increasing amputation risk. Revascularization outcomes in urban versus rural areas have not been examined.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2021 identified patients with ALI who underwent revascularization. Propensity score matching compared outcomes, analyzed using STATA version 18.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 85,760 hospitalizations for ALI receiving percutaneous revascularization 81,880 (95.5%) were in urban centers and 3,880 (4.5%) in rural facilities. Patients in urban hospitals showed higher mortality (4% vs. 2.7%), myocardial infarction (MI) (3.4% vs. 2.7%), cardiogenic shock (1.6% vs. 0.6%), cardiac arrest (6.5% vs. 5.9%), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (7.5% vs. 5.3%), mechanical circulatory support (1.1% vs. 0.5%), and acute kidney injury (18.5% vs. 15.4%). However, urban patients had lower intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (3.4% vs. 6.5%), major amputation (6.3% vs. 7.8%), fasciotomy (1.8% vs. 2.2%), and major adverse limb events (MALE) (46.4% vs. 49.1%), with a significant difference of <i>p</i> < 0.01 compared to rural hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urban hospitals in the United States report elevated mortality rates and significant cardiovascular events in comparison to their rural counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144527074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: With the substantial increase in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) usage, prescribers face complex decisions regarding the appropriate agent selection. This scoping review aimed to identify factors influencing oral anticoagulant choice in clinical practice over time.
Methods: Four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for quantitative observational studies on patients prescribed DOACs for any indication, focusing on factors affecting OAC choice. Studies published from January 2010 to March 2023 were included.
Results: Of the 4659 identified studies, 60 met selection criteria. Most (96%) examined the choice between DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKA); while (15%) evaluated factors affecting choice among DOACs. Age and gender were included in 77% and 70% of studies, respectively. Renal impairment (58%), heart failure (48%), previous stroke (43%), and thromboembolic risk (43%) were also commonly assessed. Older age had a significant negative association with DOAC prescribing in (50%) of the studies; renal impairment reduced DOAC initiation, favoring warfarin in (94%).
Conclusions: Several significant key factors were identified as being associated with OAC choice, including demographic factors such as age, and clinical factors such as kidney function, prior stroke, and other comorbidities. Significant factors in the choice among DOACs were advanced age, and renal impairment.
Registration: This systematic review was registered as a PURE protocol (https://pureportal.strath.ac.uk/en/projects/factors-associated-with-the-prescribing-of-direct-acting-oral-ant).
导论:随着直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)使用量的大幅增加,处方医师面临着关于适当药物选择的复杂决策。本综述旨在确定临床实践中影响口服抗凝剂选择的因素。方法:检索Medline、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science等4个数据库,对任意适应症患者使用doac进行定量观察研究,重点关注影响OAC选择的因素。纳入了2010年1月至2023年3月发表的研究。结果:4659项研究中,60项符合选择标准。大多数(96%)检查DOACs和维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)之间的选择;而(15%)评估影响doac选择的因素。年龄和性别分别被纳入77%和70%的研究。肾功能损害(58%)、心力衰竭(48%)、既往中风(43%)和血栓栓塞风险(43%)也常被评估。在50%的研究中,年龄较大与DOAC处方呈显著负相关;肾功能损害降低DOAC起始,华法林更有利(94%)。结论:确定了与OAC选择相关的几个重要关键因素,包括人口因素(如年龄)和临床因素(如肾功能、既往卒中和其他合并症)。高龄和肾功能损害是影响DOACs选择的重要因素。注册:本系统评价注册为PURE方案(https://pureportal.strath.ac.uk/en/projects/factors-associated-with-the-prescribing-of-direct-acting-oral-ant)。
{"title":"A scoping review of factors associated with the prescribing choice of direct oral anticoagulant drugs.","authors":"Hanan Abunimeh, Solafa NoorSaeed, Rahaf Alkhlaifat, Amanj Kurdi, Tanja Mueller","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2536043","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2536043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the substantial increase in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) usage, prescribers face complex decisions regarding the appropriate agent selection. This scoping review aimed to identify factors influencing oral anticoagulant choice in clinical practice over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for quantitative observational studies on patients prescribed DOACs for any indication, focusing on factors affecting OAC choice. Studies published from January 2010 to March 2023 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4659 identified studies, 60 met selection criteria. Most (96%) examined the choice between DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKA); while (15%) evaluated factors affecting choice among DOACs. Age and gender were included in 77% and 70% of studies, respectively. Renal impairment (58%), heart failure (48%), previous stroke (43%), and thromboembolic risk (43%) were also commonly assessed. Older age had a significant negative association with DOAC prescribing in (50%) of the studies; renal impairment reduced DOAC initiation, favoring warfarin in (94%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several significant key factors were identified as being associated with OAC choice, including demographic factors such as age, and clinical factors such as kidney function, prior stroke, and other comorbidities. Significant factors in the choice among DOACs were advanced age, and renal impairment.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>This systematic review was registered as a PURE protocol (https://pureportal.strath.ac.uk/en/projects/factors-associated-with-the-prescribing-of-direct-acting-oral-ant).</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"427-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144648924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: In-stent calcification is recognized as a significant contributor to unfavorable clinical outcomes. Understanding the various types and underlying mechanisms of in-stent calcification can help interventional operators to make decisions.
Areas covered: This review will describe the distinct types of in-stent calcification, which are categorized into in-stent smooth calcification and in-stent calcified nodule. The mechanisms and characteristics of in-stent smooth calcification and calcified nodule will be summarized. Given the differences between these two types, treatment approaches will be discussed. This review will focus on histopathology and intracoronary imaging. For the purpose of this review, evidence was gathered from electronic literature searches via PubMed, with a particular focus on primary evidence published in the last 5 years.
Expert opinion: Several treatment devices are available such as conventional balloon, modified balloon, atherectomy device, and intravascular lithotripsy. In-stent smooth calcification and calcified nodule might result in different clinical courses after repeated target lesion revascularization. Understanding the mechanisms with the various types of in-stent calcification may assist operators in selecting appropriate treatment strategies.
{"title":"Clinical differences among types of in-stent calcifications in coronary arteries: how can this be better managed?","authors":"Hiroyuki Jinnouchi, Kenichi Sakakura, Hideo Fujita","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2534715","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2534715","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In-stent calcification is recognized as a significant contributor to unfavorable clinical outcomes. Understanding the various types and underlying mechanisms of in-stent calcification can help interventional operators to make decisions.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review will describe the distinct types of in-stent calcification, which are categorized into in-stent smooth calcification and in-stent calcified nodule. The mechanisms and characteristics of in-stent smooth calcification and calcified nodule will be summarized. Given the differences between these two types, treatment approaches will be discussed. This review will focus on histopathology and intracoronary imaging. For the purpose of this review, evidence was gathered from electronic literature searches via PubMed, with a particular focus on primary evidence published in the last 5 years.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Several treatment devices are available such as conventional balloon, modified balloon, atherectomy device, and intravascular lithotripsy. In-stent smooth calcification and calcified nodule might result in different clinical courses after repeated target lesion revascularization. Understanding the mechanisms with the various types of in-stent calcification may assist operators in selecting appropriate treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"377-388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144616931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-08-09DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2543541
Ahmad Hallak, Mark B Effron
{"title":"Clinical utility of platelet FcγRIIa as a cardiovascular risk marker in patients in acute myocardial infarction.","authors":"Ahmad Hallak, Mark B Effron","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2543541","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2543541","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"373-375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144774903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-08-04DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2542838
Ana Paula Tagliari, Adriano Nunes Kochi
Introduction: Severe aortic regurgitation is a progressive condition that can lead to cardiogenic shock, a life-threatening emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality.
Areas covered: This article provides an updated review on how clinicians can diagnose, prevent, and manage aortic regurgitation presenting as cardiogenic shock, as well as discusses emerging technologies that have transformed the management of this condition.
Expert opinion: Clinicians can reduce the risk of aortic regurgitation manifesting as cardiogenic shock through a combination of early diagnosis, vigilant monitoring, optimized medical management, and timely intervention. Advanced imaging modalities, such as echocardiography and computed cardiac tomography, are essential for assessing valve function and identifying high-risk patients before decompensation occurs. For patients at risk, early referral to a multidisciplinary Heart Team is crucial for determining the optimal intervention, whether surgical or transcatheter. Future advancements in transcatheter therapies, including dedicated devices for aortic valve replacement, hold promise for expanding treatment options for high-risk patients.
{"title":"How can clinicians reduce the risk of and manage severe aortic valve regurgitation manifesting as cardiogenic shock?","authors":"Ana Paula Tagliari, Adriano Nunes Kochi","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2542838","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2542838","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe aortic regurgitation is a progressive condition that can lead to cardiogenic shock, a life-threatening emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article provides an updated review on how clinicians can diagnose, prevent, and manage aortic regurgitation presenting as cardiogenic shock, as well as discusses emerging technologies that have transformed the management of this condition.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Clinicians can reduce the risk of aortic regurgitation manifesting as cardiogenic shock through a combination of early diagnosis, vigilant monitoring, optimized medical management, and timely intervention. Advanced imaging modalities, such as echocardiography and computed cardiac tomography, are essential for assessing valve function and identifying high-risk patients before decompensation occurs. For patients at risk, early referral to a multidisciplinary Heart Team is crucial for determining the optimal intervention, whether surgical or transcatheter. Future advancements in transcatheter therapies, including dedicated devices for aortic valve replacement, hold promise for expanding treatment options for high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"405-413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144759489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-07-17DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2534707
Furkan Bolen, Adem Atici, Omer Faruk Baycan, Yusuf Yilmaz, İshak Yilmaz, Ayse Parali, Merve Kapcik, Oguz Konal, Nermin Ismayilzade, Fatma Betul Ozcan, Mustafa Caliskan
Background: Lipoprotein (Lp)(a) is a genetically inherited lipoprotein implicated in the progression of cardiovascular diseases and atherosclerosis. This study aims to examine whether elevated Lp(a) levels contribute to the development of subclinical atherosclerosis, compared to individuals with normal Lp(a) levels, using parameters such as coronary flow reserve (CFR).
Research design and methods: The study population included 25 patients with elevated Lp(a) levels and 30 subjects with normal Lp(a) levels, recruited prospectively. Conventional echocardiographic measurements were performed according to established guidelines. Main outcome measures included the comparison of CFR values between the groups.
Results: The CFR was found to be significantly decreased in the group with elevated Lp(a) levels compared to the control group (2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Additionally, a negative and statistically significant correlation was observed between Lp(a) levels and CFR, indicating that higher Lp(a) levels are associated with lower CFR values (r: -0.657, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that elevated Lp(a) levels are significantly associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and impaired coronary vasomotor function. These findings suggest that lowering Lp(a) levels could effectively reduce the risk of atherosclerotic disease by targeting its role in atherosclerosis pathogenesis.
背景:脂蛋白(Lp)(a)是一种遗传性脂蛋白,与心血管疾病和动脉粥样硬化的进展有关。本研究旨在通过冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)等参数,研究与Lp(a)水平正常的个体相比,Lp(a)水平升高是否有助于亚临床动脉粥样硬化的发展。研究设计和方法:前瞻性招募25例Lp(a)水平升高的患者和30例Lp(a)水平正常的患者。常规超声心动图测量是根据既定指南进行的。主要观察指标包括两组间CFR值的比较。结果:与对照组相比,Lp(a)水平升高组的CFR显著降低(2.0±0.5 vs. 2.5±0.6,p p)。结论:我们的研究表明,Lp(a)水平升高与亚临床动脉粥样硬化和冠状动脉血管舒张功能受损显著相关。这些发现表明,降低Lp(a)水平可以通过靶向其在动脉粥样硬化发病机制中的作用,有效降低动脉粥样硬化疾病的风险。
{"title":"The effect of lipoprotein (a) elevation on coronary flow reserve.","authors":"Furkan Bolen, Adem Atici, Omer Faruk Baycan, Yusuf Yilmaz, İshak Yilmaz, Ayse Parali, Merve Kapcik, Oguz Konal, Nermin Ismayilzade, Fatma Betul Ozcan, Mustafa Caliskan","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2534707","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2534707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipoprotein (Lp)(a) is a genetically inherited lipoprotein implicated in the progression of cardiovascular diseases and atherosclerosis. This study aims to examine whether elevated Lp(a) levels contribute to the development of subclinical atherosclerosis, compared to individuals with normal Lp(a) levels, using parameters such as coronary flow reserve (CFR).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study population included 25 patients with elevated Lp(a) levels and 30 subjects with normal Lp(a) levels, recruited prospectively. Conventional echocardiographic measurements were performed according to established guidelines. Main outcome measures included the comparison of CFR values between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CFR was found to be significantly decreased in the group with elevated Lp(a) levels compared to the control group (2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.5 ± 0.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, a negative and statistically significant correlation was observed between Lp(a) levels and CFR, indicating that higher Lp(a) levels are associated with lower CFR values (r: -0.657, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that elevated Lp(a) levels are significantly associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and impaired coronary vasomotor function. These findings suggest that lowering Lp(a) levels could effectively reduce the risk of atherosclerotic disease by targeting its role in atherosclerosis pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"477-484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144636635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2538563
Max Aboutorabi, Mahmood Ahmad, Kiran Flora, Hugo Ferreira, Michael Chiu, Jonathan J H Bray, Niraj S Kumar, Rui Providencia
Introduction: Twenty to twenty-five percent of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have concurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unclear whether direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are a safe and effective alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in concurrent HCM and AF.
Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of original reports comparing DOACs versus VKAs in concurrent HCM and AF. The protocol was published in PROSPERO -CRD42024575553. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to October 2024.
Results: From 1119 records retrieved by the search, we identified 8 different observational studies (n = 14,243). Compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with a lower rate of thromboembolic events 318/8322 vs. 559/5921 (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.83; p = 0.0118; I2 = 84%; NNT = 18), and less major bleeds 289/8322 vs. 327/5921 (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.80; p = 0.0021; I2 = 76%; NNT = 49). Apixaban and dabigatran were associated with lower rate of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, all-cause death, and intracranial hemorrhage, and Rivaroxaban associated with less all-cause deaths and intracranial hemorrhages, compared to VKAs (all p < 0.05).
Conclusions: DOACs demonstrated good efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with HCM and AF compared to VKAs.Registration: The protocol for this meta-analysis was published in PROSPERO (CRD420245755530).
{"title":"Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in concurrent hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Max Aboutorabi, Mahmood Ahmad, Kiran Flora, Hugo Ferreira, Michael Chiu, Jonathan J H Bray, Niraj S Kumar, Rui Providencia","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2538563","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2538563","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Twenty to twenty-five percent of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have concurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unclear whether direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are a safe and effective alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in concurrent HCM and AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of original reports comparing DOACs versus VKAs in concurrent HCM and AF. The protocol was published in PROSPERO -CRD42024575553. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to October 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1119 records retrieved by the search, we identified 8 different observational studies (<i>n</i> = 14,243). Compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with a lower rate of thromboembolic events 318/8322 vs. 559/5921 (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.83; <i>p</i> = 0.0118; I<sup>2</sup> = 84%; NNT = 18), and less major bleeds 289/8322 vs. 327/5921 (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.80; <i>p</i> = 0.0021; I<sup>2</sup> = 76%; NNT = 49). Apixaban and dabigatran were associated with lower rate of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, all-cause death, and intracranial hemorrhage, and Rivaroxaban associated with less all-cause deaths and intracranial hemorrhages, compared to VKAs (all <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOACs demonstrated good efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with HCM and AF compared to VKAs.<b>Registration:</b> The protocol for this meta-analysis was published in PROSPERO (CRD420245755530).</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"447-456"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144752810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-07-20DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2025.2534712
Emanuele Coppo, Alberto Giráldez Valpuesta, Juan José Serrano Silva, Jaime Fernández Rebollo, Eva González Caballero, Sergio Gamaza Chulián
Background: Exercise intolerance is a significant symptom of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and is associated with poor outcomes. While sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits, their impact on functional capacity remains debated. This study aimed to assess the effects of SGLT2i on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic HFrEF.
Research design and methods: Patients with a recent diagnosis of HFrEF and stable clinical status, referred to a heart failure unit, were prospectively enrolled. Exercise capacity was evaluated using the six-minute walk test (6MWT), and quality of life with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) both at baseline and after 6 months. Patients were stratified by etiology and analyzed according to SGLT2i use.
Results: A total of 462 patients were included (275 non-ischemic, 187 ischemic); 86 (18.6%) received SGLT2i (45 non-ischemic, 41 ischemic). At 6 months, SGLT2i treatment significantly improved 6MWT in non-ischemic patients (+31.9 m, p = 0.005), but not in ischemic patients (+9.0 m, p = 0.411; P-interaction = 0.034). MLHFQ scores improved similarly in both groups, with no significant differences related to SGLT2i use.
Conclusions: SGLT2i improved exercise capacity only in non-ischemic HFrEF patients, suggesting a differential response based on etiology.
背景:运动不耐受是心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的重要症状,并与不良预后相关。虽然钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)已被证明对心血管有益,但其对功能容量的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估SGLT2i对缺血性和非缺血性HFrEF患者运动能力和生活质量的影响。研究设计和方法:前瞻性纳入近期诊断为HFrEF且临床状态稳定的心衰单位患者。使用6分钟步行测试(6MWT)评估运动能力,并在基线和6个月后使用明尼苏达心力衰竭生活问卷(MLHFQ)评估生活质量。根据病因对患者进行分层,并根据SGLT2i的使用情况进行分析。结果:共纳入462例患者(非缺血性275例,缺血性187例);86例(18.6%)接受SGLT2i治疗(非缺血性45例,缺血性41例)。6个月时,SGLT2i治疗可显著改善非缺血性患者的6MWT (+31.9 m, p = 0.005),但缺血性患者无显著改善(+9.0 m, p = 0.411;p -相互作用= 0.034)。两组的MLHFQ评分均有相似的改善,与SGLT2i的使用没有显著差异。结论:SGLT2i仅改善非缺血性HFrEF患者的运动能力,提示基于病因的差异反应。
{"title":"Impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on functional outcomes in heart failure patients according to the aetiology.","authors":"Emanuele Coppo, Alberto Giráldez Valpuesta, Juan José Serrano Silva, Jaime Fernández Rebollo, Eva González Caballero, Sergio Gamaza Chulián","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2534712","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14779072.2025.2534712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise intolerance is a significant symptom of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and is associated with poor outcomes. While sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits, their impact on functional capacity remains debated. This study aimed to assess the effects of SGLT2i on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Patients with a recent diagnosis of HFrEF and stable clinical status, referred to a heart failure unit, were prospectively enrolled. Exercise capacity was evaluated using the six-minute walk test (6MWT), and quality of life with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) both at baseline and after 6 months. Patients were stratified by etiology and analyzed according to SGLT2i use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 462 patients were included (275 non-ischemic, 187 ischemic); 86 (18.6%) received SGLT2i (45 non-ischemic, 41 ischemic). At 6 months, SGLT2i treatment significantly improved 6MWT in non-ischemic patients (+31.9 m, <i>p</i> = 0.005), but not in ischemic patients (+9.0 m, <i>p</i> = 0.411; <i>P-interaction = 0.034</i>). MLHFQ scores improved similarly in both groups, with no significant differences related to SGLT2i use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SGLT2i improved exercise capacity only in non-ischemic HFrEF patients, suggesting a differential response based on etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"457-467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144625678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}