首页 > 最新文献

Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal最新文献

英文 中文
Antimicrobials for non-typhoidal Salmonella infection—does it work? 非伤寒沙门氏菌感染的抗菌剂——有效吗?
Pub Date : 2013-05-16 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1913
Joan Robinson

Eco-paediatrics is an occasional feature in Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal. Our goal is to contribute to the worldwide discussion on reducing waste in health care. In each instalment, we will select a recent Cochrane review highlighting a practice, still in use, which the available evidence tells us should be discontinued.

生态儿科是《基于证据的儿童健康:Cochrane评论杂志》中偶尔出现的特色。我们的目标是促进世界范围内关于减少卫生保健浪费的讨论。在每一期中,我们将选择一篇最近的Cochrane综述,重点介绍一种仍在使用的做法,现有证据告诉我们应该停止这种做法。
{"title":"Antimicrobials for non-typhoidal Salmonella infection—does it work?","authors":"Joan Robinson","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1913","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1913","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eco-paediatrics is an occasional feature in Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal. Our goal is to contribute to the worldwide discussion on reducing waste in health care. In each instalment, we will select a recent Cochrane review highlighting a practice, still in use, which the available evidence tells us should be discontinued.</p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1913","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31600416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma (Review) 为预防或减轻呼吸道症状、感染及哮喘而修补受潮及发霉损坏的楼宇(检讨)
Pub Date : 2013-05-16 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1914
Riitta Sauni, Jukka Uitti, Merja Jauhiainen, Kathleen Kreiss, Torben Sigsgaard, Jos H Verbeek

Background

Dampness and mould in buildings have been associated with adverse respiratory symptoms, asthma and respiratory infections of inhabitants. Moisture damage is a very common problem in private houses, workplaces and public buildings such as schools.

Objectives

To determine the effectiveness of remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould in order to reduce or prevent respiratory tract symptoms, infections and symptoms of asthma.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 2), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1951 to June week 1, 2011), EMBASE (1974 to June 2011), CINAHL (1982 to June 2011), Science Citation Index (1973 to June 2011), Biosis Previews (1989 to June 2011), NIOSHTIC (1930 to November 2010) and CISDOC (1974 to November 2010).

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs (cRCTs), interrupted time series studies and controlled before-after (CBA) studies of the effects of remediating dampness and mould in a building on respiratory symptoms, infections and asthma.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies.

Main results

We included eight studies (6538 participants); two RCTs (294 participants), one cRCT (4407 participants) and five CBA studies (1837 participants). The interventions varied from thorough renovation to cleaning only. We found moderate-quality evidence in adults that repairing houses decreased asthma-related symptoms (among others, wheezing (odds ratio (OR) 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 0.75) and respiratory infections (among others, rhinitis (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.66)). For children, we found moderate-quality evidence that the number of acute care visits (among others mean difference (MD) -0.45; 95% CI -0.76 to -0.14)) decreased in the group receiving thorough remediation.

One CBA study showed very low-quality evidence that after repairing a mould-damaged office building, asthma-related and other respiratory symptoms decreased. For children and staff in schools, there was very low-quality evidence that asthma-related and oth

背景:建筑物中的潮湿和霉菌与居民的不良呼吸道症状、哮喘和呼吸道感染有关。在私人住宅、工作场所和学校等公共建筑中,湿气损害是一个非常普遍的问题。目的探讨湿霉破坏建筑物的修复对减轻或预防呼吸道症状、感染和哮喘症状的效果。我们检索了Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central) (Cochrane图书馆2011年第2期),其中包括Cochrane急性呼吸道感染组专业注册库、MEDLINE(1951年至2011年6月第1周)、EMBASE(1974年至2011年6月)、CINAHL(1982年至2011年6月)、Science Citation Index(1973年至2011年6月)、Biosis Previews(1989年至2011年6月)、NIOSHTIC(1930 - 2010年11月)和CISDOC(1974 - 2010年11月)。随机对照试验(rct)、集群随机对照试验(crct)、中断时间序列研究和对照前后(CBA)研究,研究修复建筑物内潮湿和霉菌对呼吸道症状、感染和哮喘的影响。资料收集和分析两位作者独立提取资料并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。我们纳入了8项研究(6538名受试者);2项rct(294名受试者),1项cRCT(4407名受试者)和5项CBA研究(1837名受试者)。干预措施从彻底翻新到仅进行清洁不等。我们在成人中发现中等质量的证据表明,修理房屋可以减少哮喘相关症状(其中包括喘息)(优势比(OR) 0.64;95%可信区间(CI) 0.55 ~ 0.75)和呼吸道感染(其中鼻炎(OR 0.57;95% CI 0.49 ~ 0.66))。对于儿童,我们发现中等质量的证据表明,急症护理就诊次数(其中MD) -0.45;95% CI(-0.76至-0.14))在接受彻底补救的组中下降。CBA的一项研究显示,在修复了一栋被霉菌损坏的办公楼后,哮喘相关症状和其他呼吸系统症状有所减轻。对于学校的儿童和工作人员,有非常低质量的证据表明,在干预之前和之后,霉菌受损学校的哮喘相关症状和其他呼吸道症状与未受损学校的儿童和工作人员相似。对儿童来说,干预后呼吸道感染可能有所减少。作者的结论:我们发现中度到极低质量的证据表明,与不进行干预相比,修复被霉菌损坏的房屋和办公室可以减少成人哮喘相关症状和呼吸道感染。有非常低质量的证据表明,虽然修缮学校并没有显著改变工作人员或儿童的呼吸道症状,但修缮学校后,学生因普通感冒去看医生的次数减少了。需要更好的研究,最好是采用cRCT设计和更有效的结果测量。湿损是世界各地私人住宅、工作场所和公共建筑中非常常见的问题,并与居民的不良呼吸道症状、哮喘和呼吸道感染有关。我们的目的是确定修复被潮湿和霉菌损坏的建筑物在减少或预防呼吸道症状、感染和哮喘症状发生方面的有效性。我们纳入了8项研究,共6538名受试者;3项随机对照试验(rct)和5项非随机对照试验。在一项研究中,这些干预措施旨在清除家庭住宅、学校或办公楼中的霉菌和湿气。当对房屋进行修复与完全不进行干预进行比较时,我们发现了霉菌修复减少哮喘相关症状和呼吸道感染的证据。它还减少了哮喘患者使用哮喘药物。我们发现非常低质量的证据表明,在修复了霉菌损坏的办公室后,哮喘相关症状和其他呼吸道症状有所减轻。 与仅提供信息相比,对于广泛的补救措施,有中等质量的证据表明哮喘儿童的哮喘症状天数没有显著减少。但是,在大楼修复后,急诊和住院病人的次数减少了。在建筑修复后,学生因普通感冒去看医生的次数减少了,但在干预前后,在学校工作的学生和成年人的呼吸系统症状(鼻塞、流鼻涕、喉咙干、声音嘶哑、眼睛刺激)相似。由于结果测量的范围很广,研究设计也存在差异,因此很难得出确切的结论。需要更好的研究,最好是采用集群随机对照试验(cRCT)设计和更有效的结果测量。
{"title":"Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma (Review)","authors":"Riitta Sauni,&nbsp;Jukka Uitti,&nbsp;Merja Jauhiainen,&nbsp;Kathleen Kreiss,&nbsp;Torben Sigsgaard,&nbsp;Jos H Verbeek","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1914","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1914","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Dampness and mould in buildings have been associated with adverse respiratory symptoms, asthma and respiratory infections of inhabitants. Moisture damage is a very common problem in private houses, workplaces and public buildings such as schools.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To determine the effectiveness of remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould in order to reduce or prevent respiratory tract symptoms, infections and symptoms of asthma.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (<i>The Cochrane Library</i> 2011, Issue 2), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1951 to June week 1, 2011), EMBASE (1974 to June 2011), CINAHL (1982 to June 2011), Science Citation Index (1973 to June 2011), Biosis Previews (1989 to June 2011), NIOSHTIC (1930 to November 2010) and CISDOC (1974 to November 2010).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs (cRCTs), interrupted time series studies and controlled before-after (CBA) studies of the effects of remediating dampness and mould in a building on respiratory symptoms, infections and asthma.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We included eight studies (6538 participants); two RCTs (294 participants), one cRCT (4407 participants) and five CBA studies (1837 participants). The interventions varied from thorough renovation to cleaning only. We found moderate-quality evidence in adults that repairing houses decreased asthma-related symptoms (among others, wheezing (odds ratio (OR) 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 0.75) and respiratory infections (among others, rhinitis (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.66)). For children, we found moderate-quality evidence that the number of acute care visits (among others mean difference (MD) -0.45; 95% CI -0.76 to -0.14)) decreased in the group receiving thorough remediation.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>One CBA study showed very low-quality evidence that after repairing a mould-damaged office building, asthma-related and other respiratory symptoms decreased. For children and staff in schools, there was very low-quality evidence that asthma-related and oth","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1914","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31600422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34
An ounce of prevention… 一盎司的预防……
Pub Date : 2013-05-16 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1919
Michael B. H. Smith
{"title":"An ounce of prevention…","authors":"Michael B. H. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1919","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1919","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1919","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31599901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents (Review) 儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍的心理治疗(综述)
Pub Date : 2013-05-16 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1916
Donna Gillies, Fiona Taylor, Carl Gray, Louise O'Brien, Natalie D'Abrew

Background

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly prevalent in children and adolescents who have experienced trauma and has high personal and health costs. Although a wide range of psychological therapies have been used in the treatment of PTSD there are no systematic reviews of these therapies in children and adolescents.

Objectives

To examine the effectiveness of psychological therapies in treating children and adolescents who have been diagnosed with PTSD.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group's Specialised Register (CCDANCTR) to December 2011. The CCDANCTR includes relevant randomised controlled trials from the following bibliographic databases: CENTRAL (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) (all years), EMBASE (1974 -), MEDLINE (1950 -) and PsycINFO (1967 -). We also checked reference lists of relevant studies and reviews. We applied no date or language restrictions.

Selection criteria

All randomised controlled trials of psychological therapies compared to a control, pharmacological therapy or other treatments in children or adolescents exposed to a traumatic event or diagnosed with PTSD.

Data collection and analysis

Two members of the review group independently extracted data. If differences were identified, they were resolved by consensus, or referral to the review team.

We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for binary outcomes, the standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for both, using a fixed-effect model. If heterogeneity was found we used a random-effects model.

Main results

Fourteen studies including 758 participants were included in this review. The types of trauma participants had been exposed to included sexual abuse, civil violence, natural disaster, domestic violence and motor vehicle accidents. Most participants were clients of a trauma-related support service.

The psychological therapies used in these studies were cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), exposure-based, psychodynamic, narrative, supportive counselling, and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR). Most compared a psychological therapy to a control group. No study compared ps

背景创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在经历过创伤的儿童和青少年中非常普遍,并且有很高的个人和健康成本。尽管广泛的心理疗法已被用于治疗创伤后应激障碍,但这些疗法在儿童和青少年中的应用还没有系统的综述。目的探讨心理治疗对诊断为创伤后应激障碍的儿童和青少年的疗效。检索方法我们检索了Cochrane抑郁、焦虑和神经症回顾组的专业注册(CCDANCTR)至2011年12月。CCDANCTR包括来自以下书目数据库的相关随机对照试验:CENTRAL (Cochrane CENTRAL Register of controlled trials)(所有年份)、EMBASE(1974 -)、MEDLINE(1950 -)和PsycINFO(1967 -)。我们还查阅了相关研究和综述的参考文献。我们没有使用日期或语言限制。选择标准所有的随机对照试验,将心理治疗与对照、药物治疗或其他治疗方法在暴露于创伤性事件或诊断为PTSD的儿童或青少年中进行比较。数据收集和分析两名评审小组成员独立提取数据。如果发现了差异,则通过协商一致或提交给审查小组来解决。我们使用固定效应模型计算了二元结果的比值比(OR),连续结果的标准化平均差(SMD)以及两者的95%置信区间(CI)。如果发现异质性,我们使用随机效应模型。本综述纳入14项研究,758名受试者。参与者所遭受的创伤类型包括性虐待、民事暴力、自然灾害、家庭暴力和机动车事故。大多数参与者都是创伤相关支持服务的客户。这些研究中使用的心理疗法包括认知行为疗法(CBT)、暴露疗法、心理动力学疗法、叙事疗法、支持性咨询以及眼动脱敏和再加工疗法(EMDR)。大多数人将心理治疗与对照组进行比较。没有研究将心理治疗与单独的药物治疗或作为心理治疗的辅助疗法进行比较。在所有心理治疗中,改善明显更好(3项研究,n = 80, OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.12至15.85),PTSD(7项研究,n = 271, SMD -0.90, 95% CI -1.24至-0.42)、焦虑(3项研究,n = 91, SMD -0.57, 95% CI -1.00至-0.13)和抑郁(5项研究,n = 156, SMD -0.74, 95% CI -1.11至-0.36)的症状在完成心理治疗一个月内明显低于对照组。最有效的心理疗法是认知行为疗法。治疗后长达一年的改善明显更好(长达一个月:两项研究,n = 49, OR 8.64, 95% CI 2.01至37.14;最长1年:1项研究,n = 25, OR 8.00, 95% CI 1.21 ~ 52.69)。PTSD症状评分在长达一年的时间内也显著降低(长达一个月:3项研究,n = 98, SMD -1.34, 95% CI -1.79至-0.89;长达一年:一项研究,n = 36, SMD -0.73, 95% CI -1.44至-0.01),与对照组相比,CBT组抑郁评分降低长达一个月(三项研究,n = 98, SMD -0.80, 95% CI -1.47至-0.13)。未发现不良反应。没有研究被评为选择或检测偏倚的高风险,但少数研究被评为流失、报告和其他偏倚的高风险。大多数纳入的研究在选择、检测和损耗偏差方面被评为风险不明确。作者的结论:有证据表明心理疗法,尤其是CBT,在治疗儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍后长达一个月的时间内是有效的。在这个阶段,没有明确的证据表明一种心理治疗比其他心理治疗更有效。也没有足够的证据表明,患有特定类型创伤的儿童和青少年比其他人更容易或更少地对心理治疗产生反应。本综述的结果受到方法学偏差的潜在限制,以及确定的研究数量少且通常规模小。 此外,有证据表明,在一些分析中存在实质性的异质性,这无法用亚组或敏感性分析来解释。治疗后一个月以上所有心理治疗的有效性需要更多的证据。需要更多的证据来证明不同心理治疗的相对有效性,或者心理治疗与其他治疗相比的有效性。在未来的试验中,需要更多的细节来研究PTSD诊断之前的创伤类型,以及创伤是单一事件还是持续发生的。未来的研究还应旨在确定最有效和可靠的创伤后应激障碍症状的测量方法,并确保所有分数,总分和分值的报告一致。儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍的心理治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在经历过创伤且个人和健康成本高的儿童和青少年中非常普遍。本综述的目的是检查所有心理疗法治疗儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍的有效性。我们检索了所有随机对照试验,比较心理疗法与对照组、其他心理疗法或其他治疗3至18岁儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍的疗法。我们确定了14项研究,共有758名参与者。与创伤后应激障碍相关的创伤类型为性虐待、民事暴力、自然灾害、家庭暴力和机动车事故。大多数参与者都是创伤相关支持服务的客户。纳入研究中使用的心理疗法包括认知行为疗法(CBT)、暴露疗法、心理动力学疗法、叙事疗法、支持性咨询以及眼动脱敏和再加工疗法(EMDR)。大多数纳入的研究将心理治疗与对照组进行了比较。没有研究将心理治疗与药物或药物与心理治疗相结合进行比较。有充分的证据表明,心理疗法,尤其是认知行为疗法,在治疗后长达一个月的时间里,对儿童和青少年的创伤后应激障碍有治疗效果。需要更多的证据来证明心理治疗的长期有效性,并能够比较一种心理治疗与另一种心理治疗的有效性。本综述的结果受到以下因素的限制:纳入研究的潜在偏倚、无法确定的研究之间可能存在的差异、确定的研究数量较少以及大多数研究的参与者人数较少。
{"title":"Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents (Review)","authors":"Donna Gillies,&nbsp;Fiona Taylor,&nbsp;Carl Gray,&nbsp;Louise O'Brien,&nbsp;Natalie D'Abrew","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1916","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1916","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly prevalent in children and adolescents who have experienced trauma and has high personal and health costs. Although a wide range of psychological therapies have been used in the treatment of PTSD there are no systematic reviews of these therapies in children and adolescents.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine the effectiveness of psychological therapies in treating children and adolescents who have been diagnosed with PTSD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group's Specialised Register (CCDANCTR) to December 2011. The CCDANCTR includes relevant randomised controlled trials from the following bibliographic databases: CENTRAL (the <i>Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials</i>) (all years), EMBASE (1974 -), MEDLINE (1950 -) and PsycINFO (1967 -). We also checked reference lists of relevant studies and reviews. We applied no date or language restrictions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>All randomised controlled trials of psychological therapies compared to a control, pharmacological therapy or other treatments in children or adolescents exposed to a traumatic event or diagnosed with PTSD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two members of the review group independently extracted data. If differences were identified, they were resolved by consensus, or referral to the review team.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We calculated the odds ratio (OR) for binary outcomes, the standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for both, using a fixed-effect model. If heterogeneity was found we used a random-effects model.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Fourteen studies including 758 participants were included in this review. The types of trauma participants had been exposed to included sexual abuse, civil violence, natural disaster, domestic violence and motor vehicle accidents. Most participants were clients of a trauma-related support service.</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The psychological therapies used in these studies were cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), exposure-based, psychodynamic, narrative, supportive counselling, and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR). Most compared a psychological therapy to a control group. No study compared ps","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1916","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31600425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 123
Commentary on ‘Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents’ 《儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍的心理治疗》评论
Pub Date : 2013-05-16 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1917
Daniel David, Anca Dobrean

This is commentary on a Cochrane review, published in the issue of EBCH, first published as: Gillie D, Taylor F, Gray C, O'Brien L, D'Abrew N. Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD006726. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006726.pub2.

这是对发表在EBCH杂志上的Cochrane综述的评论,首次发表的标题为:Gillie D, Taylor F, Gray C, O'Brien L, D'Abrew N.儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍的心理治疗。Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012,第12期。艺术。不。: CD006726。cd006726.pub2 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.。
{"title":"Commentary on ‘Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents’","authors":"Daniel David,&nbsp;Anca Dobrean","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1917","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1917","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is commentary on a Cochrane review, published in the issue of EBCH, first published as: Gillie D, Taylor F, Gray C, O'Brien L, D'Abrew N. Psychological therapies for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. <i>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</i> 2012, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD006726. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006726.pub2.</p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1917","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31600426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Clinical Answers: Are nonpharmacological interventions for migraine effective in children and adolescents? 临床回答:非药物干预对儿童和青少年偏头痛有效吗?
Pub Date : 2013-05-16 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1918
Evidence-Based Child Health, Editorial Office
{"title":"Clinical Answers: Are nonpharmacological interventions for migraine effective in children and adolescents?","authors":"Evidence-Based Child Health, Editorial Office","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1918","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1918","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1918","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31599902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Commentaries on ‘Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma’ “修复受潮及发霉损坏的楼宇以预防或减轻呼吸道症状、感染及哮喘”评论
Pub Date : 2013-05-16 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1915
Helena Liira, Thomas Kovesi

These are commentaries on a Cochrane review, published in the issue of EBCH, first published as: Sauni R, Uitti J, Jauhiainen M, Kreiss K, Sigsgaard T, Verbeek JH. Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD007897. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007897.pub2.

这些是对发表在EBCH上的Cochrane综述的评论,首次发表为:Sauni R, uiti J, Jauhiainen M, Kreiss K, Sigsgaard T, Verbeek JH。修复受潮、发霉损坏的建筑物,预防或减轻呼吸道症状、感染和哮喘。《Cochrane数据库系统评价》2011年第9期。艺术。不。: CD007897。cd007897.pub2 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.。
{"title":"Commentaries on ‘Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma’","authors":"Helena Liira,&nbsp;Thomas Kovesi","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1915","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1915","url":null,"abstract":"<p>These are commentaries on a Cochrane review, published in the issue of EBCH, first published as: Sauni R, Uitti J, Jauhiainen M, Kreiss K, Sigsgaard T, Verbeek JH. Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma. <i>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</i> 2011, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD007897. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007897.pub2.</p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1915","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31600424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Cochrane Review: Social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) Cochrane综述:6 - 21岁自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的社交技能小组
Pub Date : 2013-03-07 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1903
Brian Reichow, Amanda M Steiner, Fred Volkmar

Background

Since autism was first described, major difficulties in social interaction have been a defining feature of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Social skills groups are a common intervention for individuals with ASD. Although a frequently recommended practice, the few studies that have addressed the efficacy of social skills groups have shown mixed results.

Objectives

To determine the effectiveness of social skills groups for improving social competence, social communication, and quality of life for people with ASD who are six to 21 years of age.

Search methods

We searched the following databases in December 2011: CENTRAL (2011 Issue 4), MEDLINE (1948 to November Week 3, 2011), EMBASE (1980 to Week 50, 2011), PsycINFO (1887 to December Week 2, 2011), CINAHL (1937 to current), ERIC (1966 to current), Sociological Abstracts (1952 to current), OCLC WorldCat (12 December 2011), Social Science Citation Index (1970 to 16 December 2011), and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (20 December 2011). We also searched the reference lists of published papers.

Selection criteria

Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing treatment (social skills groups) with a control group who were not receiving the treatment for participants aged six to 21 years with ASD. The control group could be no intervention, wait list, or treatment as usual. Outcomes sought were standardized measures of social competence, social communication, quality of life, emotion recognition, and any other specific behaviors.

Data collection and analysis

Two review authors independently selected and appraised studies for inclusion and assessed the risk of bias in each included study. All outcome data were continuous and standardized mean difference effect sizes (ES) with small sample correction were calculated. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis where possible.

Main results

We included five RCTs evaluating the effects of social skills groups in 196 participants with ASD aged 6 to 21 years old. The results show there is some evidence that social skills groups improve overall social competence (ES = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.78, P = 0.003) and friendship quality (ES = 0.41, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.81, P = 0.04) for this population. No differences were found between

自自闭症首次被描述以来,社会交往方面的主要困难一直是自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的一个典型特征。社交技能小组是对自闭症患者的一种常见干预。虽然这是一种经常被推荐的做法,但少数研究表明,社交技能小组的效果好坏参半。目的探讨社交技能小组在改善6 ~ 21岁ASD患者社交能力、社交沟通和生活质量方面的效果。我们在2011年12月检索了以下数据库:CENTRAL(2011年第4期)、MEDLINE(1948年至2011年11月第3周)、EMBASE(1980年至2011年第50周)、PsycINFO(1887年至2011年12月第2周)、CINAHL(1937年至今)、ERIC(1966年至今)、Sociological Abstracts(1952年至今)、OCLC WorldCat(2011年12月12日)、Social Science Citation Index(1970年至2011年12月16日)和metareregister of Controlled Trials(2011年12月20日)。我们还检索了已发表论文的参考文献。随机对照试验(rct)比较治疗(社会技能组)和未接受治疗的6 - 21岁ASD参与者的对照组。对照组可以不进行干预,等待名单,或照常治疗。所寻求的结果是社会能力、社会沟通、生活质量、情绪识别和任何其他特定行为的标准化测量。资料收集和分析两位综述作者独立选择和评价纳入的研究,并评估每个纳入研究的偏倚风险。所有结局数据均为连续数据,并计算经小样本校正的标准化平均差异效应量(ES)。我们尽可能进行随机效应荟萃分析。我们纳入了5项随机对照试验,评估了196名6至21岁的ASD患者的社交技能组的效果。结果显示,有一些证据表明,社交技能组提高了这一人群的整体社交能力(ES = 0.47, 95%置信区间(CI) 0.16至0.78,P = 0.003)和友谊质量(ES = 0.41, 95% CI 0.02至0.81,P = 0.04)。在两项研究中,实验组和对照组在情绪识别(ES = 0.34, 95% CI -0.20至0.88,P = 0.21)和社会沟通(ES = 0.05, 95% CI -0.63至0.72,P = 0.89)方面没有发现差异,这两项研究仅在一项研究中进行了评估。对另外两个生活质量结果进行了评估,单个研究的结果表明孤独感减少(ES = -0.66, 95% CI -1.15至-0.17),但对儿童或父母的抑郁症没有影响。无不良事件报告。考虑到干预的性质和选择的结果测量,执行和检测偏差的风险很高。这些研究的普遍性有限,因为它们都是在美国进行的;他们主要关注7到12岁的儿童,参与者都是中等或中等以上的智力水平。有一些证据表明,社交技能小组可以提高一些患有自闭症的儿童和青少年的社交能力。需要更多的研究来得出更有力的结论,特别是在改善生活质量方面。6 - 21岁自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的社交技能小组对于自闭症谱系障碍患者来说,社交缺陷仍然是最困难的领域之一,尤其是对于那些认知能力一般或高于平均水平的患者。通常用于治疗这些人社会缺陷的干预措施是社会技能小组。这篇综述综合了5项随机对照试验的结果,这些试验包括196名6至21岁的自闭症谱系障碍患者。我们发现,与没有接受治疗的人相比,接受治疗的人在社交能力和友谊方面表现出了一些改善。接受治疗的参与者也显示出孤独感减少的迹象。两项研究测量了识别不同情绪的能力,没有证据表明参加社交技能小组能提高这种能力。
{"title":"Cochrane Review: Social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)","authors":"Brian Reichow,&nbsp;Amanda M Steiner,&nbsp;Fred Volkmar","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1903","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1903","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Since autism was first described, major difficulties in social interaction have been a defining feature of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Social skills groups are a common intervention for individuals with ASD. Although a frequently recommended practice, the few studies that have addressed the efficacy of social skills groups have shown mixed results.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To determine the effectiveness of social skills groups for improving social competence, social communication, and quality of life for people with ASD who are six to 21 years of age.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched the following databases in December 2011: CENTRAL (2011 Issue 4), MEDLINE (1948 to November Week 3, 2011), EMBASE (1980 to Week 50, 2011), PsycINFO (1887 to December Week 2, 2011), CINAHL (1937 to current), ERIC (1966 to current), Sociological Abstracts (1952 to current), OCLC WorldCat (12 December 2011), Social Science Citation Index (1970 to 16 December 2011), and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (20 December 2011). We also searched the reference lists of published papers.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing treatment (social skills groups) with a control group who were not receiving the treatment for participants aged six to 21 years with ASD. The control group could be no intervention, wait list, or treatment as usual. Outcomes sought were standardized measures of social competence, social communication, quality of life, emotion recognition, and any other specific behaviors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two review authors independently selected and appraised studies for inclusion and assessed the risk of bias in each included study. All outcome data were continuous and standardized mean difference effect sizes (ES) with small sample correction were calculated. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis where possible.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We included five RCTs evaluating the effects of social skills groups in 196 participants with ASD aged 6 to 21 years old. The results show there is some evidence that social skills groups improve overall social competence (ES = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.78, P = 0.003) and friendship quality (ES = 0.41, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.81, P = 0.04) for this population. No differences were found between","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1903","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31600072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 118
Our new venture into Eco-Paediatrics 我们的新项目是生态儿科
Pub Date : 2013-03-07 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1908
Joan L. Robinson
It is early January in Edmonton, the time of year when ‘a nice day’ means it is brilliantly sunny and cold rather than cloudy and cold. One bonus is that we no longer have to even consider arthropod-borne disease in the differential diagnosis for non-travellers! I would wager that the only Latin phrase that almost all English-speaking physicians would be able to accurately translate would be ‘Primum Non Nocere’ (First, do no harm). Harm in paediatrics consists of not only suggesting remedies that result in adverse events but also advising parents or the health-care system to spend their limited, hard-earned cash on remedies that have no efficacy. It is vital to educate healthcare workers about therapies that have been proven to not be worthwhile. Thus, we are introducing a new column in this issue entitled ‘Eco-Paediatrics . . . . Reducing waste in child health one intervention at a time’. The premiere column outlines therapies that are of no value for otitis media with effusion (1). A common concern amongst clinicians is that parents will seek help elsewhere if they are sent home with reassurance rather than a prescription. However, two studies have shown that when properly informed, parents are satisfied with delayed or no antibiotic prescriptions for acute otitis media (2). A study from the US published a decade ago showed that even if provided with an ‘emergency prescription’, most parents managed their child with acute otitis media without filling the prescription (3). We need to recognize that the relationship between going home with a bottle of medicine and parental satisfaction may be markedly over-estimated by clinicians. Moving from the level of the patient to the level of the public payer, there is increasing interest in the notion that the correlation between cost and improvement in quality of health deserves to be a key factor in deciding which interventions should be promoted (4). Cardiff Child Protection Systematic Reviews (CORE INFO) is a product of collaboration between the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children and the Early Years research section of the Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Child Health, School
{"title":"Our new venture into Eco-Paediatrics","authors":"Joan L. Robinson","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1908","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1908","url":null,"abstract":"It is early January in Edmonton, the time of year when ‘a nice day’ means it is brilliantly sunny and cold rather than cloudy and cold. One bonus is that we no longer have to even consider arthropod-borne disease in the differential diagnosis for non-travellers! I would wager that the only Latin phrase that almost all English-speaking physicians would be able to accurately translate would be ‘Primum Non Nocere’ (First, do no harm). Harm in paediatrics consists of not only suggesting remedies that result in adverse events but also advising parents or the health-care system to spend their limited, hard-earned cash on remedies that have no efficacy. It is vital to educate healthcare workers about therapies that have been proven to not be worthwhile. Thus, we are introducing a new column in this issue entitled ‘Eco-Paediatrics . . . . Reducing waste in child health one intervention at a time’. The premiere column outlines therapies that are of no value for otitis media with effusion (1). A common concern amongst clinicians is that parents will seek help elsewhere if they are sent home with reassurance rather than a prescription. However, two studies have shown that when properly informed, parents are satisfied with delayed or no antibiotic prescriptions for acute otitis media (2). A study from the US published a decade ago showed that even if provided with an ‘emergency prescription’, most parents managed their child with acute otitis media without filling the prescription (3). We need to recognize that the relationship between going home with a bottle of medicine and parental satisfaction may be markedly over-estimated by clinicians. Moving from the level of the patient to the level of the public payer, there is increasing interest in the notion that the correlation between cost and improvement in quality of health deserves to be a key factor in deciding which interventions should be promoted (4). Cardiff Child Protection Systematic Reviews (CORE INFO) is a product of collaboration between the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children and the Early Years research section of the Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Child Health, School","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1908","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31600069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antihistamines or decongestants for otitis media with effusion—do they work? 抗组胺药或减充血药对中耳炎积液有效吗?
Pub Date : 2013-03-07 DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1910
Eyal Cohen

Eco-paediatrics is an occasional feature in Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal. Our goal is to contribute to the worldwide discussion on reducing waste in health care. In each instalment, we will select a recent Cochrane review highlighting a practice, still in use, which the available evidence tells us should be discontinued.

生态儿科是《基于证据的儿童健康:Cochrane评论杂志》中偶尔出现的特色。我们的目标是促进世界范围内关于减少卫生保健浪费的讨论。在每一期中,我们将选择一篇最近的Cochrane综述,重点介绍一种仍在使用的做法,现有证据告诉我们应该停止这种做法。
{"title":"Antihistamines or decongestants for otitis media with effusion—do they work?","authors":"Eyal Cohen","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1910","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ebch.1910","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Eco-paediatrics is an occasional feature in Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal. Our goal is to contribute to the worldwide discussion on reducing waste in health care. In each instalment, we will select a recent Cochrane review highlighting a practice, still in use, which the available evidence tells us should be discontinued.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1910","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31600071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1