首页 > 最新文献

Evidence Based Mental Health最新文献

英文 中文
Creating a prepared mental health workforce: comparative illustrations of implementation strategies. 建立一支有准备的精神卫生工作队伍:实施战略的比较说明。
IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300203
Bruce F Chorpita, Eric L Daleiden, Juan Diego Vera, Karen Guan

Background: Psychotherapy implementation must contend with the task of preparing a mental health workforce to provide the highest quality services to as much of a service population as possible, in high-income as well as low-to-middle income countries.

Objective: We outline general challenges and solutions and investigate how well various implementation strategies would fit a clinical population.

Methods: Using a data set from a prior cluster randomised trial with a clinically diverse population and 33 intervention practices, we presented multiple illustrations comparing the ability of different implementation strategies to serve youth and families with procedures in which service providers were trained.

Findings: A series of survival functions demonstrated that many common implementation strategies are unlikely to create a prepared workforce, given the large and diverse number of practices needed to be mastered by providers.

Clinical implications: 'Benchmark' solutions that afforded superior coverage of the service population could be supported through paced learning approaches (ie, training interventions a little at a time) using extensible, modular intervention designs.

背景:在高收入和中低收入国家,心理治疗的实施必须与培养一支精神卫生工作队伍以向尽可能多的服务人群提供最高质量服务的任务相一致。目的:我们概述了一般的挑战和解决方案,并调查各种实施策略如何适合临床人群。方法:使用来自临床不同人群和33个干预实践的先前集群随机试验的数据集,我们提供了多个插图,比较了不同实施策略的能力,通过培训服务提供者的程序为青少年和家庭服务。研究结果:一系列生存功能表明,考虑到供应商需要掌握大量不同的实践,许多常见的实施策略不太可能创造出准备好的劳动力。临床意义:通过采用可扩展的模块化干预设计的有节奏的学习方法(即每次培训干预一点),可以支持为服务人群提供卓越覆盖的“基准”解决方案。
{"title":"Creating a prepared mental health workforce: comparative illustrations of implementation strategies.","authors":"Bruce F Chorpita,&nbsp;Eric L Daleiden,&nbsp;Juan Diego Vera,&nbsp;Karen Guan","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychotherapy implementation must contend with the task of preparing a mental health workforce to provide the highest quality services to as much of a service population as possible, in high-income as well as low-to-middle income countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We outline general challenges and solutions and investigate how well various implementation strategies would fit a clinical population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a data set from a prior cluster randomised trial with a clinically diverse population and 33 intervention practices, we presented multiple illustrations comparing the ability of different implementation strategies to serve youth and families with procedures in which service providers were trained.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A series of survival functions demonstrated that many common implementation strategies are unlikely to create a prepared workforce, given the large and diverse number of practices needed to be mastered by providers.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>'Benchmark' solutions that afforded superior coverage of the service population could be supported through paced learning approaches (ie, training interventions a little at a time) using extensible, modular intervention designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"5-10"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231619/pdf/ebmental-2020-300203.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10215557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Time for a paradigm shift for psychotherapies? 是时候改变心理治疗的模式了?
IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300239
Elisabeth Schramm, Ron Rapee, Toshi A Furukawa
Schramm E, et al. Evid Based Ment Health Month 2021 Vol 0 No 0 Time for a paradigm shift for psychotherapies? Elisabeth Schramm, Ron Rapee, Toshi A Furukawa 3 Almost 70 years ago, Eysenck stirred up the community of psychotherapists by postulating that psychotherapies—at that time predominantly psychoanalytic—are not effective in the treatment of psychological disorders. This led to a massive surge of empirically evaluated psychotherapy research and promoted particularly the rise of cognitive behavioural therapy. Today, we know that a range of psychotherapies work across a wide variety of mental disorders and numerous metaanalyses of randomised controlled trials prove that Eysenck’s conclusion is no longer relevant. However, despite ample evidence that psychotherapy is generally efficacious, only 30% of patients achieve remission while as many as 65% leave treatment without a measurable benefit or even with deterioration. Therefore, psychotherapy researchers face the challenge to improve the effectiveness of their interventions. In order to solve Gordon Paul’s fundamental question—‘What treatment, by whom, is most effective for this individual with that specific problem, and under which set of circumstances?’—we have to ask: What is hindering the development of the field of psychotherapy and how can it move forward? Until today, categorical thinking still informs treatment selection and led to the development of intervention guilds and psychotherapy schools, which has retarded our progress in understanding and treating mental disorders. Mostly in absence of any empirical evidence, psychotherapy schools are usually based on plausible, yet unproven theories and on commercial and status interests of the representatives. Moreover, strong identification with one’s own school and its superiority over other schools reflects drastic allegiance effects and high risks of bias in research. As Marvin Goldfried, one of the pioneers of psychotherapy research, prominently calls out, the lack of consensus and disparate languages across theoretical orientations means that identifying the core factors that may underlie the effectiveness of psychotherapy is difficult if not impossible and holds back progress in the science and practice of psychotherapy. In more recent times, a trend is emerging to move away from nosology and a strictly categorical diagnostic approach to dimensional, functionoriented, mechanistic constructs used as specific therapy targets. Abandoning the dichotomies, categorical approaches and guilds as well as overcoming mere ‘horse races’ in efficacy research may help us to understand mechanisms and to move towards a contextual model of psychotherapy. This coincides with an increasing interest in medicine and psychology to develop individualised precision therapy. By identifying the key elements that may be driving an intervention’s effect, transdiagnosticmodularised approaches can be developed addressing pathological mechanisms such as difficult
{"title":"Time for a paradigm shift for psychotherapies?","authors":"Elisabeth Schramm,&nbsp;Ron Rapee,&nbsp;Toshi A Furukawa","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300239","url":null,"abstract":"Schramm E, et al. Evid Based Ment Health Month 2021 Vol 0 No 0 Time for a paradigm shift for psychotherapies? Elisabeth Schramm, Ron Rapee, Toshi A Furukawa 3 Almost 70 years ago, Eysenck stirred up the community of psychotherapists by postulating that psychotherapies—at that time predominantly psychoanalytic—are not effective in the treatment of psychological disorders. This led to a massive surge of empirically evaluated psychotherapy research and promoted particularly the rise of cognitive behavioural therapy. Today, we know that a range of psychotherapies work across a wide variety of mental disorders and numerous metaanalyses of randomised controlled trials prove that Eysenck’s conclusion is no longer relevant. However, despite ample evidence that psychotherapy is generally efficacious, only 30% of patients achieve remission while as many as 65% leave treatment without a measurable benefit or even with deterioration. Therefore, psychotherapy researchers face the challenge to improve the effectiveness of their interventions. In order to solve Gordon Paul’s fundamental question—‘What treatment, by whom, is most effective for this individual with that specific problem, and under which set of circumstances?’—we have to ask: What is hindering the development of the field of psychotherapy and how can it move forward? Until today, categorical thinking still informs treatment selection and led to the development of intervention guilds and psychotherapy schools, which has retarded our progress in understanding and treating mental disorders. Mostly in absence of any empirical evidence, psychotherapy schools are usually based on plausible, yet unproven theories and on commercial and status interests of the representatives. Moreover, strong identification with one’s own school and its superiority over other schools reflects drastic allegiance effects and high risks of bias in research. As Marvin Goldfried, one of the pioneers of psychotherapy research, prominently calls out, the lack of consensus and disparate languages across theoretical orientations means that identifying the core factors that may underlie the effectiveness of psychotherapy is difficult if not impossible and holds back progress in the science and practice of psychotherapy. In more recent times, a trend is emerging to move away from nosology and a strictly categorical diagnostic approach to dimensional, functionoriented, mechanistic constructs used as specific therapy targets. Abandoning the dichotomies, categorical approaches and guilds as well as overcoming mere ‘horse races’ in efficacy research may help us to understand mechanisms and to move towards a contextual model of psychotherapy. This coincides with an increasing interest in medicine and psychology to develop individualised precision therapy. By identifying the key elements that may be driving an intervention’s effect, transdiagnosticmodularised approaches can be developed addressing pathological mechanisms such as difficult","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231498/pdf/ebmental-2020-300239.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10217663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Ten-week Intensive Group Program (IGP) for borderline personality disorder: making the case for more accessible and affordable psychotherapy. 针对边缘型人格障碍的十周强化小组计划(IGP):为更容易获得和负担得起的心理治疗提供理由。
IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300195
Dervila Gec, Jillian Helen Broadbear, David Bourton, Sathya Rao

Background: The availability of specialist psychotherapies for treating borderline personality disorder (BPD) is limited by costs associated with training, resourcing and treatment duration. Developing a programme that incorporates effective strategies from a range of evidence-based specialist treatments, concentrates their delivery and uses a group-based format will improve treatment access.

Objective: To assess the short-term clinical efficacy, acceptability and feasibility of a bespoke manualised programme for the treatment of BPD. This 10-week group-based outpatient programme was delivered 2 days per week in 4 hour sessions; participants received 80 hours of treatment in total.

Methods: Forty-three participants, many having severe BPD symptomatology, were assessed before and after the 10-week programme using a range of validated self-report questionnaires and a self-appraisal feedback form. The primary outcome measured was BPD symptom severity.

Findings: Statistically significant improvements were measured in BPD symptom severity, depression, trait anxiety, emotional regulation, general health, hopefulness, self-compassion and anger, several with moderate to large effect sizes. Many of these improvements remained at 4-6 months post treatment. More than 90% of surveyed participants expressed a moderate or high level of satisfaction with the programme.

Conclusions: This integrated treatment programme delivered in a highly concentrated format demonstrated short-term efficacy across many BPD-relevant endpoints; its acceptability was endorsed by most clients.

Clinical implications: Incorporation of key aspects of evidence-based treatment using a time-intensive group format could greatly enhance the capacity of mental health services to meet the needs of people who experience BPD within a population-based mental health service framework.

背景:治疗边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的专业心理疗法的可用性受到与培训、资源和治疗时间相关的费用的限制。制定一项规划,将一系列循证专科治疗的有效战略纳入其中,集中实施这些战略,并采用基于群体的形式,将改善治疗的可及性。目的:评估定制化治疗BPD的短期临床疗效、可接受性和可行性。这个为期10周的以小组为基础的门诊项目每周提供2天,每次4小时;参与者总共接受了80个小时的治疗。方法:43名参与者,其中许多有严重的BPD症状,在10周计划前后使用一系列有效的自我报告问卷和自我评估反馈表格进行评估。测量的主要结局是BPD症状严重程度。结果:在BPD症状严重程度、抑郁、特质焦虑、情绪调节、一般健康、希望、自我同情和愤怒等方面均有统计学上显著的改善,其中一些具有中等到较大的效应量。许多这些改善在治疗后4-6个月仍然存在。超过九成的受访者对课程表示中等或高度满意。结论:这种以高度集中形式提供的综合治疗方案在许多bpd相关终点显示出短期疗效;它的可接受性得到了大多数客户的认可。临床意义:采用时间密集的小组形式纳入循证治疗的关键方面,可以大大提高精神卫生服务的能力,以满足以人群为基础的精神卫生服务框架内BPD患者的需求。
{"title":"Ten-week Intensive Group Program (IGP) for borderline personality disorder: making the case for more accessible and affordable psychotherapy.","authors":"Dervila Gec,&nbsp;Jillian Helen Broadbear,&nbsp;David Bourton,&nbsp;Sathya Rao","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The availability of specialist psychotherapies for treating borderline personality disorder (BPD) is limited by costs associated with training, resourcing and treatment duration. Developing a programme that incorporates effective strategies from a range of evidence-based specialist treatments, concentrates their delivery and uses a group-based format will improve treatment access.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the short-term clinical efficacy, acceptability and feasibility of a bespoke manualised programme for the treatment of BPD. This 10-week group-based outpatient programme was delivered 2 days per week in 4 hour sessions; participants received 80 hours of treatment in total.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three participants, many having severe BPD symptomatology, were assessed before and after the 10-week programme using a range of validated self-report questionnaires and a self-appraisal feedback form. The primary outcome measured was BPD symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Statistically significant improvements were measured in BPD symptom severity, depression, trait anxiety, emotional regulation, general health, hopefulness, self-compassion and anger, several with moderate to large effect sizes. Many of these improvements remained at 4-6 months post treatment. More than 90% of surveyed participants expressed a moderate or high level of satisfaction with the programme.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This integrated treatment programme delivered in a highly concentrated format demonstrated short-term efficacy across many BPD-relevant endpoints; its acceptability was endorsed by most clients.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Incorporation of key aspects of evidence-based treatment using a time-intensive group format could greatly enhance the capacity of mental health services to meet the needs of people who experience BPD within a population-based mental health service framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231581/pdf/ebmental-2020-300195.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10212207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Technology and implementation science to forge the future of evidence-based psychotherapies: the PRIDE scale-up study. 技术和实施科学,打造以证据为基础的心理治疗的未来:PRIDE规模研究。
IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300199
Milton L Wainberg, Maria Lídia Gouveia, Melissa Ann Stockton, Paulino Feliciano, Antonio Suleman, Jennifer J Mootz, Milena Mello, Andre Fiks Salem, M Claire Greene, Charl Bezuidenhout, Phuti Ngwepe, Kathryn L Lovero, Palmira Fortunato Dos Santos, Simone H Schriger, David S Mandell, Rogerio Mulumba, Anibal Neves Anube, Dirceu Mabunda, Flavio Mandlate, Francine Cournos, Jean-Marie Alves-Bradford, Terriann Nicholson, Bianca Kann, Wilza Fumo, Cristiane S Duarte, Jair de Jesus Mari, Marcelo F Mello, Ana O Mocumbi, Maria A Oquendo, Myrna M Weissman

Objective: To report the interim results from the training of providers inevidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) and use of mobile applications.

Design and setting: The Partnerships in Research to Implement and Disseminate Sustainable and Scalable Evidence (PRIDE) study is a cluster-randomised hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial comparing three delivery pathways for integrating comprehensive mental healthcare into primary care in Mozambique. Innovations include the use of EBPs and scaling-up of task-shifted mental health services using mobile applications.

Main outcome measures: We examined EBP training attendance, certification, knowledge and intentions to deliver each component. We collected qualitative data through rapid ethnography and focus groups. We tracked the use of the mobile applications to investigate early reach of a valid screening tool (Electronic Mental Wellness Tool) and the roll out of the EBPs PARTICIPANTS: Psychiatric technicians and primary care providers trained in the EBPs.

Results: PRIDE has trained 110 EBP providers, supervisors and trainers and will train 279 community health workers in upcoming months. The trainings improved knowledge about the EBPs and trainees indicated strong intentions to deliver the EBP core components. Trained providers began using the mobile applications and appear to identify cases and provide appropriate treatment.

Conclusions: The future of EBPs requires implementation within existing systems of care with fidelity to their core evidence-based components. To sustainably address the vast mental health treatment gap globally, EBP implementation demands: expanding the mental health workforce by training existing human resources; sequential use of EBPs to comprehensively treat mental disorders and their comorbid presentations and leveraging digital screening and treatment applications.

目的:报告提供者基于必然性的心理治疗(ebp)培训和移动应用程序使用的中期结果。设计和环境:实施和传播可持续和可扩展证据的研究伙伴关系(PRIDE)研究是一项分组随机混合有效性-实施试验,比较了莫桑比克将综合精神卫生保健纳入初级保健的三种交付途径。创新包括使用ebp和使用移动应用程序扩大任务转移的精神卫生服务。主要结果测量:我们检查了EBP培训出勤率、认证、知识和交付每个组成部分的意图。我们通过快速人种学和焦点小组收集定性数据。我们跟踪了移动应用程序的使用情况,以调查有效筛查工具(电子心理健康工具)的早期覆盖范围和ebp参与者的推出情况:接受过ebp培训的精神病学技术人员和初级保健提供者。结果:PRIDE已经培训了110名EBP提供者、主管和培训师,并将在未来几个月培训279名社区卫生工作者。培训提高了对EBP的认识,受训者表示了交付EBP核心组件的强烈意愿。训练有素的服务提供者开始使用移动应用程序,似乎能够识别病例并提供适当的治疗。结论:ebp的未来需要在现有的护理系统中实施,并忠实于其核心循证成分。为了可持续地解决全球巨大的精神卫生治疗差距,实施EBP需要:通过培训现有人力资源扩大精神卫生工作队伍;连续使用ebp综合治疗精神障碍及其共病表现,并利用数字筛查和治疗应用。
{"title":"Technology and implementation science to forge the future of evidence-based psychotherapies: the PRIDE scale-up study.","authors":"Milton L Wainberg,&nbsp;Maria Lídia Gouveia,&nbsp;Melissa Ann Stockton,&nbsp;Paulino Feliciano,&nbsp;Antonio Suleman,&nbsp;Jennifer J Mootz,&nbsp;Milena Mello,&nbsp;Andre Fiks Salem,&nbsp;M Claire Greene,&nbsp;Charl Bezuidenhout,&nbsp;Phuti Ngwepe,&nbsp;Kathryn L Lovero,&nbsp;Palmira Fortunato Dos Santos,&nbsp;Simone H Schriger,&nbsp;David S Mandell,&nbsp;Rogerio Mulumba,&nbsp;Anibal Neves Anube,&nbsp;Dirceu Mabunda,&nbsp;Flavio Mandlate,&nbsp;Francine Cournos,&nbsp;Jean-Marie Alves-Bradford,&nbsp;Terriann Nicholson,&nbsp;Bianca Kann,&nbsp;Wilza Fumo,&nbsp;Cristiane S Duarte,&nbsp;Jair de Jesus Mari,&nbsp;Marcelo F Mello,&nbsp;Ana O Mocumbi,&nbsp;Maria A Oquendo,&nbsp;Myrna M Weissman","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300199","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report the interim results from the training of providers inevidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) and use of mobile applications.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>The Partnerships in Research to Implement and Disseminate Sustainable and Scalable Evidence (PRIDE) study is a cluster-randomised hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial comparing three delivery pathways for integrating comprehensive mental healthcare into primary care in Mozambique. Innovations include the use of EBPs and scaling-up of task-shifted mental health services using mobile applications.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>We examined EBP training attendance, certification, knowledge and intentions to deliver each component. We collected qualitative data through rapid ethnography and focus groups. We tracked the use of the mobile applications to investigate early reach of a valid screening tool (Electronic Mental Wellness Tool) and the roll out of the EBPs PARTICIPANTS: Psychiatric technicians and primary care providers trained in the EBPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PRIDE has trained 110 EBP providers, supervisors and trainers and will train 279 community health workers in upcoming months. The trainings improved knowledge about the EBPs and trainees indicated strong intentions to deliver the EBP core components. Trained providers began using the mobile applications and appear to identify cases and provide appropriate treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The future of EBPs requires implementation within existing systems of care with fidelity to their core evidence-based components. To sustainably address the vast mental health treatment gap globally, EBP implementation demands: expanding the mental health workforce by training existing human resources; sequential use of EBPs to comprehensively treat mental disorders and their comorbid presentations and leveraging digital screening and treatment applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300199","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10565562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Evaluation of a mental health drop-in centre offering brief transdiagnostic psychological assessment and treatment for children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions and their families: a single-arm, open, non-randomised trial. 为患有长期躯体疾病的儿童和青少年及其家庭提供简短的跨诊断心理评估和治疗的心理健康救助中心的评估:单臂、开放、非随机试验。
IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-26 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300197
Matteo Catanzano, Sophie D Bennett, Ellie Kerry, Holan Liang, Isobel Heyman, Anna E Coughtrey, Kate Fifield, Chloe Taylor, Tim Dalgleish, Laila Xu, Roz Shafran

Background: Children and young people with long-term physical conditions have significantly elevated mental health needs. Transdiagnostic, brief psychological interventions have the potential to increase access to evidence-based psychological treatments for patients who attend health services primarily for physical health needs.

Objective: A non-randomised study was conducted to assess the impact of brief, transdiagnostic psychological interventions in children and young people presenting at a drop-in mental health centre in the reception area of a paediatric hospital.

Methods: 186 participants attending a transdiagnostic mental health drop-in centre were allocated to assessment and psychological intervention based on a clinical decision-making algorithm. Interventions included signposting, guided self-help based on a modular psychological treatment and referral to the hospital's paediatric psychology service. The primary transdiagnostic mental health outcome measure was the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), which was given at baseline and 6 months post-baseline.

Findings: There was a significant positive impact of attending the drop-in mental health centre on the SDQ (Cohen's d=0.22) and on the secondary outcome measure of Paediatric Quality of life (Cohen's d=0.55).

Conclusions: A mental health drop-in centre offering brief, transdiagnostic assessment and treatment may reduce emotional and behavioural symptoms and improve quality of life in children and young people with mental health needs in the context of long-term physical conditions. A randomised controlled trial to investigate the specificity of any effects is warranted.

Clinical implications: Drop-in centres for mental health needs may increase access and have beneficial effects for children and young people with physical conditions.

背景:患有长期躯体疾病的儿童和青少年对心理健康的需求明显增加。跨诊断、简短的心理干预措施有可能让那些主要因身体健康需求而就医的患者获得更多循证心理治疗:方法:根据临床决策算法,186 名参加跨诊断心理健康救助中心的患者被分配到评估和心理干预中心。干预措施包括转介、基于模块化心理治疗的指导性自助以及转介至医院的儿科心理服务。主要的跨诊断心理健康结果测量指标是家长报告的优势与困难问卷(SDQ),该问卷在基线和基线后6个月进行测量:结果:参加心理健康救助中心对 SDQ(Cohen's d=0.22)和儿科生活质量(Cohen's d=0.55)都有明显的积极影响:结论:提供简短、跨诊断评估和治疗的心理健康就诊中心可以减轻有心理健康需求的儿童和青少年的情绪和行为症状,改善他们的生活质量。有必要进行随机对照试验,以调查任何效果的特异性:临床意义:针对心理健康需求的救助中心可能会增加有身体状况的儿童和青少年获得治疗的机会,并产生有益的影响。
{"title":"Evaluation of a mental health drop-in centre offering brief transdiagnostic psychological assessment and treatment for children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions and their families: a single-arm, open, non-randomised trial.","authors":"Matteo Catanzano, Sophie D Bennett, Ellie Kerry, Holan Liang, Isobel Heyman, Anna E Coughtrey, Kate Fifield, Chloe Taylor, Tim Dalgleish, Laila Xu, Roz Shafran","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300197","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children and young people with long-term physical conditions have significantly elevated mental health needs. Transdiagnostic, brief psychological interventions have the potential to increase access to evidence-based psychological treatments for patients who attend health services primarily for physical health needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A non-randomised study was conducted to assess the impact of brief, transdiagnostic psychological interventions in children and young people presenting at a drop-in mental health centre in the reception area of a paediatric hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>186 participants attending a transdiagnostic mental health drop-in centre were allocated to assessment and psychological intervention based on a clinical decision-making algorithm. Interventions included signposting, guided self-help based on a modular psychological treatment and referral to the hospital's paediatric psychology service. The primary transdiagnostic mental health outcome measure was the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), which was given at baseline and 6 months post-baseline.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was a significant positive impact of attending the drop-in mental health centre on the SDQ (Cohen's d=0.22) and on the secondary outcome measure of Paediatric Quality of life (Cohen's d=0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A mental health drop-in centre offering brief, transdiagnostic assessment and treatment may reduce emotional and behavioural symptoms and improve quality of life in children and young people with mental health needs in the context of long-term physical conditions. A randomised controlled trial to investigate the specificity of any effects is warranted.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Drop-in centres for mental health needs may increase access and have beneficial effects for children and young people with physical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/bd/ebmental-2020-300197.PMC7958088.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10217652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Design of a brief psychological intervention for youth who self-harm: a formative study in India. 对自残青少年的简短心理干预设计:印度的一项形成性研究。
IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-18 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300188
Shilpa Aggarwal, George Patton, Michael Berk, Vikram Patel

Background: There is an urgent need for context-specific research leading to development of scalable interventions to address self-harm and suicide in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Objective: The current study was conducted to determine the contents of a psychological intervention to reduce recurrence of self-harm and improve functioning in youth who self-harm in India and finalise its delivery mechanisms.

Methods: A systematic, sequential approach was used to integrate available scientific evidence, expert service providers' knowledge and experience, and service users' lived experiences in the codesigning and development of a psychological intervention. The steps included: identifying prioritised outcomes for youth who self-harm as well as a selection of feasible and acceptable elements from self-harm interventions that have been trialled in LMICs, intervention development workshops with mental health professionals and youth to finalise elements, a review of relevant treatment manuals to decide on the treatment framework, and finalising the treatment structure and schedule in the second round of intervention development workshops.

Findings: We developed ATMAN treatment with three key elements; problem solving, emotion regulation and social network strengthening skills. The delivery schedule emphasises on the engagement elements, and allows for involvement of other stakeholders such as family members when acceptable to the clients.

Conclusion and clinical implications: ATMAN treatment could prove to be especially effective in reducing self-harm recurrence in youth in India due to its brief schedule, elements that have been selected in collaboration with the service users and its potential to be scaled up for delivery by non-specialist treatment providers.

背景:迫切需要针对具体情况进行研究,从而开发可扩展的干预措施,以解决低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的自我伤害和自杀问题。目的:目前的研究旨在确定心理干预的内容,以减少自我伤害的复发,改善印度青少年自我伤害的功能,并最终确定其实施机制。方法:采用系统的、顺序的方法,整合现有的科学证据、专家服务提供者的知识和经验以及服务使用者的生活经验,共同设计和开发心理干预。这些步骤包括:确定自残青年的优先结果,以及从中低收入国家试行的自残干预措施中选择可行和可接受的要素,与精神卫生专业人员和青年一起举办干预措施发展讲习班,以确定要素,审查相关治疗手册,以确定治疗框架,并在第二轮干预措施发展讲习班中确定治疗结构和时间表。研究结果:我们开发了具有三个关键要素的ATMAN治疗;问题解决、情绪调节和社会网络强化技能。交付时间表强调参与要素,并允许其他利益相关者(如家庭成员)在客户可接受的情况下参与。结论和临床意义:ATMAN治疗在减少印度青少年自残复发方面可能被证明特别有效,因为它的时间表短,与服务使用者合作选择的要素,以及由非专业治疗提供者扩大提供的潜力。
{"title":"Design of a brief psychological intervention for youth who self-harm: a formative study in India.","authors":"Shilpa Aggarwal, George Patton, Michael Berk, Vikram Patel","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300188","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300188","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an urgent need for context-specific research leading to development of scalable interventions to address self-harm and suicide in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study was conducted to determine the contents of a psychological intervention to reduce recurrence of self-harm and improve functioning in youth who self-harm in India and finalise its delivery mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic, sequential approach was used to integrate available scientific evidence, expert service providers' knowledge and experience, and service users' lived experiences in the codesigning and development of a psychological intervention. The steps included: identifying prioritised outcomes for youth who self-harm as well as a selection of feasible and acceptable elements from self-harm interventions that have been trialled in LMICs, intervention development workshops with mental health professionals and youth to finalise elements, a review of relevant treatment manuals to decide on the treatment framework, and finalising the treatment structure and schedule in the second round of intervention development workshops.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We developed ATMAN treatment with three key elements; problem solving, emotion regulation and social network strengthening skills. The delivery schedule emphasises on the engagement elements, and allows for involvement of other stakeholders such as family members when acceptable to the clients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical implications: </strong>ATMAN treatment could prove to be especially effective in reducing self-harm recurrence in youth in India due to its brief schedule, elements that have been selected in collaboration with the service users and its potential to be scaled up for delivery by non-specialist treatment providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"e2"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7116890/pdf/ebmental-2020-300188.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38617517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systematic review to examine the methods used to adapt evidence-based psychological treatments for adults diagnosed with a mental illness. 系统回顾检查用于适应成人诊断为精神疾病的循证心理治疗方法。
IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-21 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300225
Allison G Harvey, Hannah S Lammers, Michael R Dolsen, Alice C Mullin, Heather E Hilmoe, Melanie Tran, Vera Portnova, Alison B Tuck, Ajitha Mallidi, Anya Fang, Caitlin Byrnes, Esther Kao, Colin Lee

Question: The context for the implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs) often differs from the context in which the treatment was developed, which necessitates adaptations. In this systematic review we build on, and add to, prior approaches by examining the method used to guide such adaptations. In particular, we sought to elucidate the extent to which an empirical process is used.

Study selection and analysis: We focused on publications describing adaptations made to EBPTs for adults diagnosed with a mental illness. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science from database inception to July 2018. Two raters independently coded the articles for the method used to conduct the adaptation, the reason for and nature of the adaptation, and who made the adaptation.

Findings: The search produced 20 194 citations, which yielded 152 articles after screening. The most commonly used methods for planned adaptations were literature review (57.7%), clinical intuition (47.0%) and theory (38.9%). The use of data from stakeholder interviews ranked fourth (21.5%) and the use of other types of data (eg, pilot study, experiment, survey, interview) ranked last at fifth (12.1%). Few publications reporting ad hoc adaptations were identified (n=3).

Conclusions: This review highlights a need to (a) educate providers and researchers to carefully consider the methods used for the treatment adaptation process, and to use empirical methods where possible and where appropriate, (b) improve the quality of reporting of stakeholder interviews and (c) develop reporting standards that articulate optimal methods for conducting treatment adaptations.

问题:基于证据的心理治疗(EBPTs)的实施背景往往与治疗的发展背景不同,这需要适应。在这篇系统综述中,我们通过检查用于指导这种适应的方法,建立并补充了先前的方法。特别是,我们试图阐明经验过程被使用的程度。研究选择和分析:我们重点关注描述诊断为精神疾病的成人对ebpt的适应的出版物。我们从数据库建立到2018年7月检索了PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase和Web of Science。两名评分员分别对改编的方法、改编的原因和性质以及改编的人进行了独立编码。结果:检索产生20194次引用,筛选后产生152篇文章。最常用的计划适应性方法是文献回顾(57.7%)、临床直觉(47.0%)和理论(38.9%)。使用利益相关者访谈的数据排名第四(21.5%),使用其他类型的数据(例如,试点研究,实验,调查,访谈)排名最后,排名第五(12.1%)。报告特别调整的出版物很少(n=3)。结论:本综述强调需要(a)教育提供者和研究人员仔细考虑治疗适应过程中使用的方法,并在可能和适当的情况下使用经验方法,(b)提高利益相关者访谈报告的质量,(c)制定报告标准,阐明进行治疗适应的最佳方法。
{"title":"Systematic review to examine the methods used to adapt evidence-based psychological treatments for adults diagnosed with a mental illness.","authors":"Allison G Harvey, Hannah S Lammers, Michael R Dolsen, Alice C Mullin, Heather E Hilmoe, Melanie Tran, Vera Portnova, Alison B Tuck, Ajitha Mallidi, Anya Fang, Caitlin Byrnes, Esther Kao, Colin Lee","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300225","DOIUrl":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300225","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Question: </strong>The context for the implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs) often differs from the context in which the treatment was developed, which necessitates adaptations. In this systematic review we build on, and add to, prior approaches by examining the method used to guide such adaptations. In particular, we sought to elucidate the extent to which an empirical process is used.</p><p><strong>Study selection and analysis: </strong>We focused on publications describing adaptations made to EBPTs for adults diagnosed with a mental illness. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science from database inception to July 2018. Two raters independently coded the articles for the method used to conduct the adaptation, the reason for and nature of the adaptation, and who made the adaptation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The search produced 20 194 citations, which yielded 152 articles after screening. The most commonly used methods for planned adaptations were literature review (57.7%), clinical intuition (47.0%) and theory (38.9%). The use of data from stakeholder interviews ranked fourth (21.5%) and the use of other types of data (eg, pilot study, experiment, survey, interview) ranked last at fifth (12.1%). Few publications reporting ad hoc adaptations were identified (n=3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights a need to (a) educate providers and researchers to carefully consider the methods used for the treatment adaptation process, and to use empirical methods where possible and where appropriate, (b) improve the quality of reporting of stakeholder interviews and (c) develop reporting standards that articulate optimal methods for conducting treatment adaptations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8254592/pdf/ebmental-2020-300225.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39080572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From cognitive targets to symptom reduction: overview of attention and interpretation bias modification research. 从认知目标到症状减轻:注意与解释偏倚修正研究综述。
IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300216
Chelsea Dyan Gober, Amit Lazarov, Yair Bar-Haim

Cognitive bias modification (CBM) is a class of mechanised psychological interventions designed to target specific aberrant cognitive processes considered key in the aetiology and/or maintenance of specific psychiatric disorders. In this review, we outline a multistage translational process that allows tracking progress in CBM research. This process involves four steps: (1) the identification of reliable cognitive targets and establishing their association with specific disorders; (2) clinical translations designed to rectify the identified cognitive targets; (3) verification of effective target engagement and (4) testing of clinical utility in randomised controlled trials. Through the prism of this multistage process, we review progress in clinical CBM research in two cognitive domains: attention and interpretation; in six psychiatric conditions: anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, addictive disorders, eating disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The review highlights achievement as well as shortcomings of the CBM approach en route to becoming a recognised evidence-supported therapy for these disorders.

认知偏差矫正(CBM)是一类机械化的心理干预措施,旨在针对特定的异常认知过程,这些异常认知过程被认为是特定精神疾病病因和/或维持的关键。在这篇综述中,我们概述了一个多阶段的转化过程,可以跟踪CBM研究的进展。这一过程包括四个步骤:(1)确定可靠的认知目标并建立它们与特定疾病的关联;(2)旨在纠正已识别的认知目标的临床翻译;(3)验证有效的目标接触(4)在随机对照试验中测试临床效用。通过这一多阶段过程的棱镜,我们回顾了两个认知领域的临床CBM研究进展:注意和解释;六种精神疾病:焦虑症、重度抑郁症、创伤后应激障碍、成瘾性障碍、饮食失调和强迫症。这篇综述强调了CBM方法在成为这些疾病公认的有证据支持的治疗方法的过程中取得的成就和缺点。
{"title":"From cognitive targets to symptom reduction: overview of attention and interpretation bias modification research.","authors":"Chelsea Dyan Gober,&nbsp;Amit Lazarov,&nbsp;Yair Bar-Haim","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive bias modification (CBM) is a class of mechanised psychological interventions designed to target specific aberrant cognitive processes considered key in the aetiology and/or maintenance of specific psychiatric disorders. In this review, we outline a multistage translational process that allows tracking progress in CBM research. This process involves four steps: (1) the identification of reliable cognitive targets and establishing their association with specific disorders; (2) clinical translations designed to rectify the identified cognitive targets; (3) verification of effective target engagement and (4) testing of clinical utility in randomised controlled trials. Through the prism of this multistage process, we review progress in clinical CBM research in two cognitive domains: attention and interpretation; in six psychiatric conditions: anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, addictive disorders, eating disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The review highlights achievement as well as shortcomings of the CBM approach en route to becoming a recognised evidence-supported therapy for these disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"42-46"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300216","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10214148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Revived call for consensus in the future of psychotherapy. 重新唤起对未来心理治疗共识的呼吁。
IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300208
Averi N Gaines, Marvin R Goldfried, Michael J Constantino

The emblem of success in psychotherapy research and practice has long been innovation. Although such ingenuity is commendable, it has nonetheless perpetuated fragmentation across the field. At least four decades ago, it was suggested that achieving consensus on what constitutes psychotherapy's theoretical, empirical, and practical 'core' might allow the discipline to evolve beyond its siloed state, as is reflective of mature science. Yet, division remains the rule versus exception, owing in large part to power struggles among disparate schools of therapy and quarrels over whether theory-specific or theory-common factors most account for therapeutic change. We outline here a vision for psychotherapy's future that is defined by consensus rather than disintegration. Namely, we reiterate the need for the field to invest in clinical strategies that transcend ostensibly incompatible theoretical models. We also argue that psychotherapy research should build on the growing evidence for such clinical strategies in an effort to establish core, evidence-based principles of therapeutic change. We then discuss how establishing consensus will require reconciliation among the mounting evidence for flexible, principle-informed practice with the current realities of training, dissemination, and implementation paradigms. Finally, we articulate ways in which practicing clinicians will serve a vital role in carrying out, and amending as needed, actionable efforts toward psychotherapy consensus.

长期以来,心理治疗研究和实践成功的标志就是创新。尽管这种独创性是值得称赞的,但它仍然使整个领域的分裂永久化。至少在四十年前,就有人提出,就心理治疗的理论、经验和实践“核心”的构成达成共识,可能会让这门学科超越其孤立的状态,这是成熟科学的反映。然而,分歧仍然是规则与例外,这在很大程度上是由于不同治疗学派之间的权力斗争,以及关于究竟是理论特异性因素还是理论共性因素最能解释治疗变化的争论。我们在这里概述了心理治疗的未来,这是由共识而不是分裂来定义的。也就是说,我们重申该领域需要投资于超越表面上不相容的理论模型的临床策略。我们还认为,心理治疗研究应该建立在越来越多的临床策略证据的基础上,努力建立治疗改变的核心、循证原则。然后,我们讨论了建立共识如何需要将越来越多的证据与当前培训、传播和实施范例的现实情况进行协调,以实现灵活的、有原则的实践。最后,我们阐明了实践临床医生将在执行和修改必要的心理治疗共识方面发挥重要作用的方法。
{"title":"Revived call for consensus in the future of psychotherapy.","authors":"Averi N Gaines,&nbsp;Marvin R Goldfried,&nbsp;Michael J Constantino","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300208","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emblem of success in psychotherapy research and practice has long been innovation. Although such ingenuity is commendable, it has nonetheless perpetuated fragmentation across the field. At least four decades ago, it was suggested that achieving consensus on what constitutes psychotherapy's theoretical, empirical, and practical 'core' might allow the discipline to evolve beyond its siloed state, as is reflective of mature science. Yet, division remains the rule versus exception, owing in large part to power struggles among disparate schools of therapy and quarrels over whether theory-specific or theory-common factors most account for therapeutic change. We outline here a vision for psychotherapy's future that is defined by consensus rather than disintegration. Namely, we reiterate the need for the field to invest in clinical strategies that transcend ostensibly incompatible theoretical models. We also argue that psychotherapy research should build on the growing evidence for such clinical strategies in an effort to establish core, evidence-based principles of therapeutic change. We then discuss how establishing consensus will require reconciliation among the mounting evidence for flexible, principle-informed practice with the current realities of training, dissemination, and implementation paradigms. Finally, we articulate ways in which practicing clinicians will serve a vital role in carrying out, and amending as needed, actionable efforts toward psychotherapy consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"2-4"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300208","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10205787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
App-based guided problem-solving intervention for adolescent mental health: a pilot cohort study in Indian schools. 基于app的青少年心理健康引导问题解决干预:印度学校的试点队列研究
IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-18 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300194
Pattie P Gonsalves, Eleanor Sara Hodgson, Bhargav Bhat, Rhea Sharma, Abhijeet Jambhale, Daniel Michelson, Vikram Patel

Background: This paper describes the pilot evaluation of 'POD Adventures', a lay counsellor-guided problem-solving intervention delivered via a smartphone app in Indian secondary schools.

Objective: To test the feasibility and acceptability of POD Adventures for adolescents with a felt need for psychological support, and to explore the intervention's effects on self-reported mental health symptoms, prioritised problems, stress and well-being.

Methods: We used a mixed-methods pre-post cohort design. Participants were self-referred from grades 9-12 in two coeducational government-aided secondary schools in Goa, India. The intervention was delivered in two formats, 'mixed' (comprising individual and small group sessions) and 'group' (small group sessions only).

Findings: 248 participants enrolled in the study and 230 (92.7%) completed the intervention. Outcomes at 4 weeks showed significant improvements on all measures that were maintained at 12 weeks. Large effects were observed on problem severity scores (4 weeks, d=1.47; 12 weeks, d=1.53) while small to moderate effects were seen on mental health symptoms, stress and well-being. 22 students completed qualitative interviews about their experience of the intervention. Participants found POD Adventures easy to use, engaging and helpful in solving their problems. They were satisfied with the guidance provided by the counsellor irrespective of delivery format.

Conclusions: POD Adventures was feasible to deliver with guidance from lay counsellors in Indian schools, acceptable to participants and associated with large improvements in problem severity and mental health symptom severity.

Clinical implications: POD Adventures has promise as an early intervention for adolescents with a felt need for psychological support in low-resource settings.

背景:本文描述了“POD冒险”的试点评估,这是一种在印度中学通过智能手机应用程序提供的外行辅导员指导的问题解决干预。目的:探讨对有心理支持需求的青少年进行POD冒险的可行性和可接受性,并探讨干预对自我报告的心理健康症状、优先问题、压力和幸福感的影响。方法:采用混合方法的前后队列设计。参与者来自印度果阿邦两所男女同校的政府资助中学的9-12年级。干预以两种形式进行,“混合”(包括个人和小组会议)和“小组”(仅包括小组会议)。结果:248名参与者参加了研究,230名(92.7%)完成了干预。第4周的结果显示,12周时所有指标均有显著改善。在问题严重程度评分上观察到很大的影响(4周,d=1.47;12周,d=1.53),而对心理健康症状、压力和幸福感的影响较小。22名学生完成了关于干预体验的定性访谈。参与者发现POD Adventures易于使用,引人入胜,有助于解决他们的问题。不论授课形式如何,他们都对辅导员提供的指导感到满意。结论:在印度学校外行辅导员的指导下,POD Adventures是可行的,参与者可以接受,并与问题严重程度和心理健康症状严重程度的大幅改善有关。临床意义:POD Adventures有希望在资源匮乏的环境中为需要心理支持的青少年提供早期干预。
{"title":"App-based guided problem-solving intervention for adolescent mental health: a pilot cohort study in Indian schools.","authors":"Pattie P Gonsalves,&nbsp;Eleanor Sara Hodgson,&nbsp;Bhargav Bhat,&nbsp;Rhea Sharma,&nbsp;Abhijeet Jambhale,&nbsp;Daniel Michelson,&nbsp;Vikram Patel","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2020-300194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper describes the pilot evaluation of 'POD Adventures', a lay counsellor-guided problem-solving intervention delivered via a smartphone app in Indian secondary schools.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the feasibility and acceptability of POD Adventures for adolescents with a felt need for psychological support, and to explore the intervention's effects on self-reported mental health symptoms, prioritised problems, stress and well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a mixed-methods pre-post cohort design. Participants were self-referred from grades 9-12 in two coeducational government-aided secondary schools in Goa, India. The intervention was delivered in two formats, 'mixed' (comprising individual and small group sessions) and 'group' (small group sessions only).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>248 participants enrolled in the study and 230 (92.7%) completed the intervention. Outcomes at 4 weeks showed significant improvements on all measures that were maintained at 12 weeks. Large effects were observed on problem severity scores (4 weeks, d=1.47; 12 weeks, d=1.53) while small to moderate effects were seen on mental health symptoms, stress and well-being. 22 students completed qualitative interviews about their experience of the intervention. Participants found POD Adventures easy to use, engaging and helpful in solving their problems. They were satisfied with the guidance provided by the counsellor irrespective of delivery format.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POD Adventures was feasible to deliver with guidance from lay counsellors in Indian schools, acceptable to participants and associated with large improvements in problem severity and mental health symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>POD Adventures has promise as an early intervention for adolescents with a felt need for psychological support in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300194","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38617515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
期刊
Evidence Based Mental Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1