Foot最新文献

Fracture of the hallucial sesamoids is a pathology that causes difficulty for surgeons and patients. Because of the low incidence and the fact that up to 64–90 % heal with non-operative management, there is a lack of clear guidance in the literature for the surgical treatment of sesamoid fracture in cases of failure of non-operative management. Here long term follow up of an alternative method of surgical treatment of sesamoid fracture recalcitrant to nonoperative management is presented.

32 individuals were treated with temporary surgical immobilisation of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint using either crossed wires or two orthogonally placed two hole plates. The patients then underwent removal of the construct at 8 weeks post op after confirmation of healing on a CT scan. There was a 94 % union rate. Return to work was 61 days (15–90) return to sport 80 days (64–112) with no immediate complications and no recurrence. At last follow up mean 10 years (4–16) only 2 patients had gone on to asymptomatic non-union and one patient developed arthritis between the sesamoid and the metatarsal head. No patient has required further surgical intervention.

This retrospective cohort of patients demonstrate that this method of treatment is a valuable option in the management of sesamoid fracture which does not alter the biomechanics of the foot and has none of the long term complications of sesamoidectomy or partial sesamoidectomy.

Diabetic foot complications are serious issues resulting from uncontrolled diabetes, primarily affecting the feet. Common complications include diabetic neuropathy, ulcers, PAD, Charcot foot, and gangrene. Preventive measures include controlling blood glucose levels, regular foot inspections, proper foot care, wearing appropriate footwear, and seeking prompt medical attention. A holistic approach to diabetic foot management is crucial due to the complex interplay of physiological, psychological, and environmental factors. Glycaemic control is essential for mitigating neuropathy and vasculopathy, while cardiovascular risk factors like hypertension and dyslipidemia are crucial for preventing complications. In South Africa, podiatrists play a crucial role in diabetic foot care, offering specialized expertise in the assessment, management, and prevention of foot complications associated with diabetes mellitus. They collaborate closely with other healthcare professionals to ensure comprehensive and coordinated care.Pharmacological management is a crucial aspect of podiatric care in the UK, where podiatrists use various medications to treat foot conditions effectively. In South Africa, podiatrists lack prescribing authority, leading to limited treatment options, dependency on referrals, and disparities in access to care. This fragmented approach can compromise patient outcomes, especially in chronic conditions like diabetes. To improve patient outcomes and promote optimal foot condition management, policy reforms, interdisciplinary collaboration, and professional advocacy efforts are needed.Policy recommendations for expanding podiatrist prescribing privileges include legislative reforms, regulatory framework updates, and professional accreditation. Legislative reforms could involve amending existing healthcare laws or introducing new regulations that recognize podiatrists as authorized prescribers. Regulatory framework updates should involve working with regulatory bodies to establish prescribing standards, prescribing limitations, and mechanisms for ongoing oversight and accountability. Professional accreditation should ensure educational programs for podiatrists incorporate training in pharmacology, pharmacotherapy, and prescribing practices to prepare graduates for the expanded scope of practice.Stakeholders in South Africa can improve diabetes management by advocating for policy reforms, professional recognition, and patient empowerment initiatives. By aligning policy, practice, education, research, and advocacy efforts, stakeholders can create a supportive ecosystem that fosters innovation, collaboration, and continuous improvement in diabetic foot care.

Background

Arthrodesis of the naviculocuneiform joint (NCJ) can be performed in isolation or in conjunction with arthrodesis of other joints, often in the presence of deformity. In the literature there is relative rarity of articles reporting on results and complications of NCJ arthrodesis.

Patients and methods

Thirty-six patients (36 feet) with symptomatic NCJ arthritis underwent arthrodesis. Mean age was 59.1 years (SD 13.1; range 26–78) and 24 were women. Adjuvant procedures were performed simultaneously in 29 patients, whilst 17 had planovalgus and 1 had cavovarus foot deformity.

Results

Union of the NCJ arthrodesis was achieved in 35 out of 36 (97.2 %) patients, whilst one patient developed non-union. Mean time to union was 13.1 weeks (SD 3.8; range 8–24). Two patients (5.6 %) developed deep infection and 5 patients (13.9 %) required secondary surgical procedures. Twenty-three patients (63.9 %) rated the outcome as good or excellent, 11 (30.6 %) as fair and 2 (5.6 %) as poor.

Conclusions

NCJ arthrodesis was part of a more complex procedure in most of the patients. Whilst union was achieved in almost all patients and complication rate was acceptable, only 64 % rated their outcome as good or excellent.

Level of clinical evidence

IV

The aim of the current study was to understand the importance of the joint alignment following triple arthrodesis by analysing the contact characteristics in a normal and arthritic ankle joint using a patient-specific numerical model developed using open source software. The alignment of the hindfoot with respect to tibia is calculated from CT scans and the ankle joint model was numerically analysed for neutral, valgus and varus positions in both normal and arthritic conditions. The contact area, the magnitude and distribution of the contact pressure on the articular surface of the talar dome was evaluated using a cell-centred Finite Volume Method implemented in open-source software OpenFOAM. It was found that all positions of the hindfoot predict higher lateral pressures during heel strike. The varus position predicts the maximum increase in lateral pressures. Comparing the valgus and neutral positions, although the neutral position predicts 9.1 % higher increase in lateral pressures during heel strike than valgus, it predicts 33.6 % decrease in pressures during heel-rise and the distribution is more medial during toe-off. In the case of arthritic ankle, it could be observed that the neutral and varus hindfoot fusion positions result in a concentrated increase of lateral pressures in heel strike and flat-foot. In the case of toe-off, the neutral alignment results in an increase of 62.3 % in the contact pressures compared to the arthritic pressure of the unfused foot and is 20.8 % higher than the valgus alignment. The study helps to conclude that the fusion is more beneficial at the neutral position of the hindfoot for the patient specific ankle. However, the 5° valgus position of hindfoot alignment could be more beneficial in the arthritic ankle. Patient-specific approach to the placement of the hindfoot with the help of numerical analysis could help address the issue of ankle degradation following arthrodesis.

Introduction

Plantar fasciopathy is a common foot-related musculoskeletal disorder. It has been hypothesized that this disorder could be linked to a dysfunctional windlass mechanism. However, no study to date has quantified this link to validate or refute this hypothesis. The first metatarsophalangeal joint (1st MPJ) dorsiflexion resistance test is a reliable test to evaluate the force required to initiate the windlass mechanism. Comparing the results of this test in individuals with and without plantar fasciopathy will allow for a better understanding of the relationship between plantar fasciopathy and the windlass mechanism. Thus, this study aimed to compare 1st MPJ dorsiflexion resistance in individuals with plantar fasciopathy and healthy controls. Additionally, this study aimed to explore the correlations between 1st MPJ dorsiflexion resistance and other commonly used foot orthopedic tests, specifically the supination resistance test and the Foot Posture Index.

Material and methods

Twenty participants with plantar fasciopathy and 20 healthy controls were recruited in this case-control study. First MPJ dorsiflexion resistance was quantified and compared between groups and between feet using a repeated measures ANOVA with one within-subject factor with two levels and one between-subject factor with two levels. It was also correlated with supination resistance and the Foot Posture Index.

Results

There were no significant differences in 1st MPJ dorsiflexion resistance between injured and healthy feet as well as control and plantar fasciopathy groups. There was a moderate to strong correlation (r = 0.674 to 0.891) between 1st MPJ dorsiflexion resistance and supination resistance in both groups. There was no significant correlation between 1st MPJ dorsiflexion resistance and the Foot Posture Index.

Conclusions

The lack of alterations in 1st MPJ dorsiflexion resistance among individuals with plantar fasciopathy implies a potential need to reconsider the biomechanical model, proposing that a dysfunctional windlass mechanism is associated with the development of plantar fasciopathy, may need reconsideration.

Background

In response to the all-time high of female sports participation, there has been increasing scientific discourse and media interest in women’s sporting injuries in recent years. In gender comparable sports the rate of foot and ankle injury for women is higher than for men. There are intrinsic and extrinsic factors which may explain this difference.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines of PubMed, Ovid EMBASE and OVID MEDLINE. Relevant key terms were used to narrow the scope of the search prior to screening. Case reports, review articles, paediatric patients, non foot and ankle injuries and combat sports were excluded. We used dual author, two pass screening to arrive at final included studies.

Results

2510 articles were screened after duplicate exclusion. 104 were included in this literature review. We identified lack of reporting gender difference in the literature.We identified that females have higher frequency and severity of injury. We provide an overview of our current understanding of ankle ligament complex injuries, stress fractures, ostochondral lesions of the talus and Achilles tendon rupture. We expand on the evidence of two codes of football, soccer and Australian rules, as a “case study” of how injury patterns differ between genders in the same sport. We identify gender specific characteristics including severity, types of injury, predisposing risk factors, anatomy, endocrinology and biomechanics associated with injuries. Finally, we examine the effect of level of competition on female injury patterns.

Conclusions

There is a lack of scientific reporting of gender differences of foot and ankle injuries. Female athletes suffer foot and ankle injuries at higher rates and with greater severity compared to males. This is an under-reported, yet important area of orthopaedics and sports medicine to understand, and hence reduce the injury burden for female athletes.

The aim of the study was to measure and compare plantar pressures, forces and gait parameters in athletes with and without hallux valgus. It was a cross sectional study with the sample Size: 106 [53 for each group (Hallux valgus and without hallux valgus)]. Hallux valgus angle was calculated with digital photographs uploaded on Karasunpo software. Participants only with the moderate and severe hallux valgus angle were selected. For participant having hallux valgus in both the feet, one with the greater angle of hallux valgus was selected. Participants without hallux valgus were the ones whose hallux valgus angle was less than 15 degrees. The participants of both groups were asked to walk on predetermined speed of 4.8 kmph. The device used was Zebris FDM-T (Zebris® Medical GmbH, Germany) for the pedobarographic and gait parameter measurement. On an average, measurement was recorded for 20 steps during the different phases of gait in all subjects and corresponding mean values were calculated. Mean values for all the readings were documented and statistically calculated. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS (v.27.0.1) with unpaired t-test to compare between both the groups. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check normality of data. Significant p-values for forefoot forces (0.001), forefoot pressures (<0.001) and midfoot pressures (0.002) were found. There is clear evidence of increased foot loading in young adult athletes with hallux valgus on the forefoot and midfoot regions while performing activities.

Background

Forty-three percent of all diabetic foot ulcers occur under the medial forefoot due to a medial deviation of elevated pressures and premature forefoot ground contact in neuropathic diabetic patients. A 6-week sensorimotor training period with an unstable shoe construction reduces in-shoe peak pressures and contact times under the medial aspect of the forefoot.

Methods

The study was designed as a Randomised Control Trial with two diabetic groups (one served as intervention group and one as control group) and one non-diabetic intervention group. Measurements for barefoot pressure distribution and contact times were taken by means of an Emed® pressure measurement platform (Novel GmbH, Munich) before and after 6 weeks. During this time the diabetic and the non-diabetic intervention groups were required to wear an unstable shoe construction (Masai Barefoot Technology, MBT®) for at least four hours per day.

Findings

Results for the non-diabetic intervention group showed significantly later contact times for the medial portion of the forefoot, resulting in shorter contact times. Peak pressure was also reduced under the medial aspect of the foot while it was increased under the lateral aspect of the foot. Changes for the diabetic intervention group followed the same pattern while the values of the diabetic control group shifted away from the reference values.

Interpretation

A 6-week sensorimotor training period with an unstable shoe construction can change barefoot peak pressures and contact times in non-diabetic subjects and in diabetic patients in the most endangered area, i.e. the medial forefoot.

Background

Weil’s osteotomy (WO) and distal metatarsal metaphyseal osteotomy (DMMO) are considered to be the gold standard of managing metatarsalgia. Stiffness and floating toe are the main disadvantages of the WO, whereas delayed union or malunion and prolonged swelling are the main complications of the DMMO. The purpose of this study is to compare these two methods, in terms of outcome and complications, through a metaanalysis of the literature.

Materials and methods

Pubmed, Google Scholar and Mendeley databases were searched for studies comparing directly the outcome of DMMO and Weil’s osteotomy, with a minimum follow up of six months. The random effects model was used for the metaanalysis. The quality of studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria.

Results

Four studies were eligible for the analysis including 211 patients in total. The mean difference of the postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) among the two techniques was − 1,04 (C.I.: −3,50 – 1,43) and − 0,39 (CI: −0,83 – 0,08) respectively. The risk difference regarding postoperative stiffness, swelling and residual metatarsalgia was − 0,09 (95% C.I.: −0,23 – 0,06), − 0,17 (95% C.I.: −0,62 – 0,29) and − 0,06 (95% C.I.: −0,20 – 0,08) respectively.

Conclusion

Based on the existing literature, Weil’s osteotomy and DMMO are equally safe and effective for the treatment of metatarsalgia. More studies of better quality are required, in order to extract safer and absolute conclusions regarding this topic.

Introduction

The prone foot posture has a negative effect on postural stability, function, and knee valgus, but to our knowledge, the contribution of the degree of pronation has not been examined.

Methods

39 participants aged 18–40, with Foot Posture Index (FPI) scores between 6–12 and without any pain complaints were included. Participants with 6–9 points were included in the pronation group (PG) (n = 19), and participants with 10–12 points were included in the hyperpronation group (HPG) (n = 20). Static and dynamic postural stability, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and frontal plane projection angles (FPPA) were measured for all participants.

Results

The initial data of the participants are distributed homogeneously. In the intergroup evaluation only FPI-1 (p = 0.001; p < 0.05), FPI-4 (p = 0.00; p < 0.05), FPI-5 (p = 0.00; p < 0.05) and FPI-T (p = 0.000; p < 0.05) scores were found significantly different.

Conclusion

Pronation and hyperpronation of the subtalar joint did not lead to a difference in postural stability, function, and knee valgus in healthy individuals. It may be more beneficial to focus on the prone posture rather than the degree of pronation.