Jeremy M. Brooks, Colden V. Baxter, Dana R. Warren, Keeley L. MacNeill
<div> <p> </p><ol> <li>Decades-old research describes dynamic interdependence among aquatic and terrestrial food webs, leading to calls for integrating cross-ecosystem linkages with landscape ecology to evaluate dynamics of spatially-subsidised food webs. Though development of meta-community theory has suggested that such spatial dynamics may help sustain biodiversity, empirical data remain limited. In northern Yellowstone National Park, over a century of terrestrial wildlife dynamics, including the extirpation and subsequent reintroduction of wolves, have contributed to a habitat mosaic in which stream-riparian ecosystems are dominated by either woody or herbaceous vegetation. In the context of this habitat mosaic, we addressed the overarching questions: (1) Are habitat mosaics associated with spatial and temporal variation in reciprocal fluxes and linked food webs and (2) how do biodiversity, organism traits and species interactions influence, and are they influenced by, that spatial and temporal variation?</li> <li>From 2019 to 2021, we intensively sampled eight headwater streams to characterise reciprocal fluxes of aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates and the patterns of potential responses by fish, birds, bats and spiders. We evaluated sites individually as well as how they contributed to a meta-community.</li> <li>We found that local stream-riparian ecosystems contributed to a mosaic in which reciprocal fluxes of invertebrates among local patches were asynchronous and tracked by both aquatic and terrestrial consumers in ways mediated by organism traits. Within sites, aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate fluxes were seasonally asynchronous with each other, but these patterns varied from site to site. Across the mosaic, comparisons of daily aquatic insect emergence varied from 25% to 167% among streams and did so variably throughout the year, revealing asynchronous dynamics created at the meta-community scale. Daily inputs of terrestrial invertebrates were similarly asynchronous across the mosaic, varying from 14% to 170%. These asynchronies were positively correlated with invertebrate beta diversity and associated with varying riparian vegetation, stream temperature, and flow regimes. In turn, in situ consumers tracked the allochthonous invertebrate prey in ways that were mediated by site context (i.e., local habitat characteristics) and consumer traits (e.g., range, foraging strategy and breeding requirements).</li> <li>Based on these observations as an example, we infer there is not one way for food webs to be reciprocally and spatially linked, but multiple ways that can vary both across a spatial mosaic and through time. Our findings provide empirical evidence suggesting potential relationships between habitat complexity and the maintenance of biodive
{"title":"Enter the Mosaic: Aquatic-Terrestrial Reciprocal Fluxes and Food Webs Are Dynamically Interdependent Across Space and Through Time","authors":"Jeremy M. Brooks, Colden V. Baxter, Dana R. Warren, Keeley L. MacNeill","doi":"10.1111/fwb.70094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70094","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 \u0000 </p><ol>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>Decades-old research describes dynamic interdependence among aquatic and terrestrial food webs, leading to calls for integrating cross-ecosystem linkages with landscape ecology to evaluate dynamics of spatially-subsidised food webs. Though development of meta-community theory has suggested that such spatial dynamics may help sustain biodiversity, empirical data remain limited. In northern Yellowstone National Park, over a century of terrestrial wildlife dynamics, including the extirpation and subsequent reintroduction of wolves, have contributed to a habitat mosaic in which stream-riparian ecosystems are dominated by either woody or herbaceous vegetation. In the context of this habitat mosaic, we addressed the overarching questions: (1) Are habitat mosaics associated with spatial and temporal variation in reciprocal fluxes and linked food webs and (2) how do biodiversity, organism traits and species interactions influence, and are they influenced by, that spatial and temporal variation?</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>From 2019 to 2021, we intensively sampled eight headwater streams to characterise reciprocal fluxes of aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates and the patterns of potential responses by fish, birds, bats and spiders. We evaluated sites individually as well as how they contributed to a meta-community.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>We found that local stream-riparian ecosystems contributed to a mosaic in which reciprocal fluxes of invertebrates among local patches were asynchronous and tracked by both aquatic and terrestrial consumers in ways mediated by organism traits. Within sites, aquatic and terrestrial invertebrate fluxes were seasonally asynchronous with each other, but these patterns varied from site to site. Across the mosaic, comparisons of daily aquatic insect emergence varied from 25% to 167% among streams and did so variably throughout the year, revealing asynchronous dynamics created at the meta-community scale. Daily inputs of terrestrial invertebrates were similarly asynchronous across the mosaic, varying from 14% to 170%. These asynchronies were positively correlated with invertebrate beta diversity and associated with varying riparian vegetation, stream temperature, and flow regimes. In turn, in situ consumers tracked the allochthonous invertebrate prey in ways that were mediated by site context (i.e., local habitat characteristics) and consumer traits (e.g., range, foraging strategy and breeding requirements).</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>Based on these observations as an example, we infer there is not one way for food webs to be reciprocally and spatially linked, but multiple ways that can vary both across a spatial mosaic and through time. Our findings provide empirical evidence suggesting potential relationships between habitat complexity and the maintenance of biodive","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145101985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rebeca Arias-Real, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, Simone Guareschi, Cayetano Gutiérrez-Cánovas
{"title":"Assessing the Effects of Fresh, Air-Drying and Freezing Preservation Methods on Enzymatic Activities From Fluvial Ecosystems","authors":"Rebeca Arias-Real, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, Simone Guareschi, Cayetano Gutiérrez-Cánovas","doi":"10.1111/fwb.70095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70095","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fwb.70095","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145101652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zijie Yang, Baozhu Pan, Zhiyuan Feng, Wenpeng Ma, Gang Li, Siquan Wang
Plankton (including phytoplankton and zooplankton) play a crucial role in maintaining aquatic ecosystem stability, yet their influence on the stability of fragile freshwater ecosystems in arid regions remains underexplored.
This study systematically investigated the biodiversity dynamics, co-occurrence patterns and community stability of plankton in common freshwater bodies (rivers and reservoirs) within the Yanhe River Basin, a representative arid region in northern China. The response thresholds of plankton communities to key influencing factors were determined.
The results indicated greater diversity and similarity among riverine plankton communities in the main stream and tributaries, despite lower biomass compared to those in reservoirs. Plankton network robustness and community stability were also higher in rivers than in reservoirs, mainly due to distinct roles of phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity across different types of water bodies. Water nutrients (e.g., nitrogen sources), pH, turbidity and the ratio of zooplankton to phytoplankton biomass (Z/P ratio) emerged as key factors shaping plankton community structure and stability. The threshold ranges of total nitrogen, pH, turbidity and Z/P ratio for plankton community responses were 0.053 to 1.126 mg/L, 8.7 to 9.0, 28.53 to 83.23 NTU, and 0.64% to 16.0%, respectively.
This study provides a glimpse into how plankton diversity and community interactions drive freshwater ecosystem stability, and proposes operational guidelines for water resource management and ecological conservation under arid conditions.
{"title":"Plankton as the Cornerstone of Arid Freshwater Ecosystem Stability: From Biodiversity to Stability","authors":"Zijie Yang, Baozhu Pan, Zhiyuan Feng, Wenpeng Ma, Gang Li, Siquan Wang","doi":"10.1111/fwb.70097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70097","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 \u0000 </p><ol>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>Plankton (including phytoplankton and zooplankton) play a crucial role in maintaining aquatic ecosystem stability, yet their influence on the stability of fragile freshwater ecosystems in arid regions remains underexplored.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>This study systematically investigated the biodiversity dynamics, co-occurrence patterns and community stability of plankton in common freshwater bodies (rivers and reservoirs) within the Yanhe River Basin, a representative arid region in northern China. The response thresholds of plankton communities to key influencing factors were determined.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>The results indicated greater diversity and similarity among riverine plankton communities in the main stream and tributaries, despite lower biomass compared to those in reservoirs. Plankton network robustness and community stability were also higher in rivers than in reservoirs, mainly due to distinct roles of phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity across different types of water bodies. Water nutrients (e.g., nitrogen sources), pH, turbidity and the ratio of zooplankton to phytoplankton biomass (Z/P ratio) emerged as key factors shaping plankton community structure and stability. The threshold ranges of total nitrogen, pH, turbidity and Z/P ratio for plankton community responses were 0.053 to 1.126 mg/L, 8.7 to 9.0, 28.53 to 83.23 NTU, and 0.64% to 16.0%, respectively.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>This study provides a glimpse into how plankton diversity and community interactions drive freshwater ecosystem stability, and proposes operational guidelines for water resource management and ecological conservation under arid conditions.</li>\u0000 </ol>\u0000 \u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145101653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Freshwater fish communities differ widely across spatial scales due to environmental filtering and limited dispersal. However, the relative importance of these mechanisms is poorly understood, especially along subtropical elevational gradients. Species traits may further help to predict species niches and co-occurrences and allow for generalisations across multiple ecosystems. We aimed to model the occurrence of fish species as a function of environmental covariates and distance, testing for the effects of traits and phylogeny on species niches and co-occurrence patterns. We also aimed to test the consistency in these relationships between the river basins.
We fitted two joint species distribution models (JSDM) to a dataset of fish sampled over multiple years, across the Teesta–Jaldhaka basins of the Eastern Himalayas.
The effects of environmental filtering were stronger than those of distance. Elevation, total dissolved solutes, dissolved oxygen and stream width explained much variation in species occurrences, but their relative importance differed among basins. Traits explained relatively less variation in species niches and co-occurrences, and their effects differed among basins. However, the residual phylogenetic signal in niches indicates that unmeasured traits likely play a stronger role.
Environmental filtering primarily structures lotic fish communities along subtropical elevational gradients in the two adjacent Eastern Himalayan River basins. However, the relative influence of covariates and the nature of trait–niche relationships differs.
This variability makes broad generalisations difficult across freshwater basins while providing an opportunity to test and explore the applicability of ecological filters in other riverine systems.
{"title":"Testing Environmental Filters Across Basins: Community Assembly of Freshwater Fishes in a Subtropical Montane Riverscape","authors":"Soumyadip Panja, Rubina Mondal, Sumit Homechaudhuri, Anuradha Bhat","doi":"10.1111/fwb.70100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70100","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 \u0000 </p><ol>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>Freshwater fish communities differ widely across spatial scales due to environmental filtering and limited dispersal. However, the relative importance of these mechanisms is poorly understood, especially along subtropical elevational gradients. Species traits may further help to predict species niches and co-occurrences and allow for generalisations across multiple ecosystems. We aimed to model the occurrence of fish species as a function of environmental covariates and distance, testing for the effects of traits and phylogeny on species niches and co-occurrence patterns. We also aimed to test the consistency in these relationships between the river basins.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>We fitted two joint species distribution models (JSDM) to a dataset of fish sampled over multiple years, across the Teesta–Jaldhaka basins of the Eastern Himalayas.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>The effects of environmental filtering were stronger than those of distance. Elevation, total dissolved solutes, dissolved oxygen and stream width explained much variation in species occurrences, but their relative importance differed among basins. Traits explained relatively less variation in species niches and co-occurrences, and their effects differed among basins. However, the residual phylogenetic signal in niches indicates that unmeasured traits likely play a stronger role.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>Environmental filtering primarily structures lotic fish communities along subtropical elevational gradients in the two adjacent Eastern Himalayan River basins. However, the relative influence of covariates and the nature of trait–niche relationships differs.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>This variability makes broad generalisations difficult across freshwater basins while providing an opportunity to test and explore the applicability of ecological filters in other riverine systems.</li>\u0000 </ol>\u0000 \u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145102062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paradyse E. Blackwood, Emily L. Martin, Catherine L. Searle
{"title":"Temperature Variability and Salt Pollution Interact to Alter Subsequent Multi-Parasite Susceptibility in Larval Amphibians","authors":"Paradyse E. Blackwood, Emily L. Martin, Catherine L. Searle","doi":"10.1111/fwb.70080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70080","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fwb.70080","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144930035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Issue Information - Cover and Ed Board","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/fwb.14280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.14280","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fwb.14280","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144915188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah Treby, Tarmo A. Raadik, Caitlyn L. Parsons, Nicholas P. Murphy
{"title":"Population Ecology of Freshwater Mussels Hyridella narracanensis and H. drapeta in South-Eastern Australia","authors":"Sarah Treby, Tarmo A. Raadik, Caitlyn L. Parsons, Nicholas P. Murphy","doi":"10.1111/fwb.70090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70090","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fwb.70090","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144905271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We inadvertently reversed parts B and C of Figure 3. The caption remains the same, but herein is presented the corrected version of Figure 3.
我们无意中颠倒了图3的B和C部分。标题保持不变，但这里给出了图3的更正版本。
{"title":"Correction: Key Abiotic and Biotic Variables Influencing Lake Plankton Communities Across Canada","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/fwb.70091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70091","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We inadvertently reversed parts B and C of Figure 3. The caption remains the same, but herein is presented the corrected version of Figure 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fwb.70091","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144905312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pierre Quévreux, Kejun Zou, Sébastien Barot, Élisa Thébault, Emma Rochelle-Newall, Ludwig Jardillier, Éric Edeline, Simon Agostini, Jacques Mériguet, Sarah Fiorini, Gérard Lacroix
The classical concepts of top-down and bottom-up cascading effects in ecosystems are challenged by the interactions between green and brown food webs. The green food web relies on photosynthesis and the brown food web relies on the mineralisation of dead organic matter. Mutualistic interactions between these two food webs are crucial for ecosystem functioning because a major fraction of organic carbon is produced by the green food web, while mineral nutrients are mainly recycled through the brown one. However, green and brown food webs can compete for mineral nutrients if decomposers are nutrient limited. Thus, bottom-up or top-down effects on one food web can have major cascading effects on the other one.
In our freshwater mesocosm experiment, we tested cascading bottom-up effects targeting the green food web through sunlight filtering and the brown food web through organic carbon addition; cascading top-down effects mediated by fish presence.
Our main finding is a positive effect of fish on phytoplankton density in mesocosms where daylight was reduced. Fish also had a positive effect on the brown food web with increased abundances of heterotrophic prokaryotes and microbial eukaryotes. However, they had no significant effect on zooplankton biomass. We did not observe any cascading effect of light treatment on the brown food web and of organic carbon treatment on the green food web. Our organic carbon treatment had nearly no effect on the brown food web.
The most likely explanation for the observed fish × light interaction is a bottom-up effect mediated by nutrient cycling embodied by the increased sediment production and DOC accumulation in the presence of fish. The lack of effect of our organic carbon treatment may be due to the moderate quantity of added carbon and of the low bioavailability of some of the added molecules.
Our experiment suggests that fish can strongly stimulate phytoplankton through bottom-up effects due to nutrient cycling, and not only through the classic trophic cascade due to the top-down control on large herbivorous zooplankton.
{"title":"Combined Effects of Fish, Light and Allochthonous Dissolved Organic Carbon on Interactions Between Green and Brown Food Webs: An Aquatic Mesocosm Experiment","authors":"Pierre Quévreux, Kejun Zou, Sébastien Barot, Élisa Thébault, Emma Rochelle-Newall, Ludwig Jardillier, Éric Edeline, Simon Agostini, Jacques Mériguet, Sarah Fiorini, Gérard Lacroix","doi":"10.1111/fwb.70081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70081","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>\u0000 \u0000 </p><ol>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>The classical concepts of top-down and bottom-up cascading effects in ecosystems are challenged by the interactions between green and brown food webs. The green food web relies on photosynthesis and the brown food web relies on the mineralisation of dead organic matter. Mutualistic interactions between these two food webs are crucial for ecosystem functioning because a major fraction of organic carbon is produced by the green food web, while mineral nutrients are mainly recycled through the brown one. However, green and brown food webs can compete for mineral nutrients if decomposers are nutrient limited. Thus, bottom-up or top-down effects on one food web can have major cascading effects on the other one.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>In our freshwater mesocosm experiment, we tested cascading bottom-up effects targeting the green food web through sunlight filtering and the brown food web through organic carbon addition; cascading top-down effects mediated by fish presence.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>Our main finding is a positive effect of fish on phytoplankton density in mesocosms where daylight was reduced. Fish also had a positive effect on the brown food web with increased abundances of heterotrophic prokaryotes and microbial eukaryotes. However, they had no significant effect on zooplankton biomass. We did not observe any cascading effect of light treatment on the brown food web and of organic carbon treatment on the green food web. Our organic carbon treatment had nearly no effect on the brown food web.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>The most likely explanation for the observed fish × light interaction is a bottom-up effect mediated by nutrient cycling embodied by the increased sediment production and DOC accumulation in the presence of fish. The lack of effect of our organic carbon treatment may be due to the moderate quantity of added carbon and of the low bioavailability of some of the added molecules.</li>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <li>Our experiment suggests that fish can strongly stimulate phytoplankton through bottom-up effects due to nutrient cycling, and not only through the classic trophic cascade due to the top-down control on large herbivorous zooplankton.</li>\u0000 </ol>\u0000 \u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144905311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Seasonal Shifts in the Use of Green and Brown Food Resources by a Dominant Stream Grazer","authors":"Walter R. Hill, John G. Smith","doi":"10.1111/fwb.70092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70092","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 \u0000 </p>","PeriodicalId":12365,"journal":{"name":"Freshwater Biology","volume":"70 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fwb.70092","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144888330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：