Pub Date : 2023-09-06DOI: 10.1097/fs9.0000000000000080
M. L. Lohiya, Parikshit Singh Chandawat, Jay Prakash Rangi, Mohan Lal, Apeksha Kulhari
Trichobezoars are gastrointestinal concretions of ingested hair. These are uncommon conditions that arise in emotionally disturbed or mentally impaired young females during childhood and adolescence. Rapunzel syndrome is rare gastric trichobezoar that extends beyond the pylorus, leading to an intestinal obstruction. Gastric trichobezoars do not manifest symptoms until they are very large. Here, we report a 16-year-old girl, with 5 years history of trichophagia and trichotillomania, who suffered a huge (30 cm × 7.5 cm × 6 cm) gastric trichobezoar extending into duodenum (Rapunzel syndrome) that was successfully addressed by laparotomy, psychiatric treatment and follow-up
毛虫是摄入的头发在胃肠道形成的结块。这些不常见的情况出现在情绪紊乱或精神受损的年轻女性在童年和青春期。莴苣综合征是一种罕见的胃毛状息肉，它延伸到幽门之外，导致肠梗阻。胃毛虫直到很大时才表现出症状。在此，我们报告一名16岁的女孩，有5年的食毛癖和拔毛癖病史，她患有巨大(30 cm × 7.5 cm × 6 cm)的胃拔毛，并延伸到十二指肠(Rapunzel综合征)，经剖腹手术、精神治疗和随访成功解决
{"title":"A Huge Gastric Trichobezoar presenting with Rapunzel Syndrome: A Case Report","authors":"M. L. Lohiya, Parikshit Singh Chandawat, Jay Prakash Rangi, Mohan Lal, Apeksha Kulhari","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000080","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 Trichobezoars are gastrointestinal concretions of ingested hair. These are uncommon conditions that arise in emotionally disturbed or mentally impaired young females during childhood and adolescence. Rapunzel syndrome is rare gastric trichobezoar that extends beyond the pylorus, leading to an intestinal obstruction. Gastric trichobezoars do not manifest symptoms until they are very large. Here, we report a 16-year-old girl, with 5 years history of trichophagia and trichotillomania, who suffered a huge (30 cm × 7.5 cm × 6 cm) gastric trichobezoar extending into duodenum (Rapunzel syndrome) that was successfully addressed by laparotomy, psychiatric treatment and follow-up","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41362240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-11DOI: 10.1097/fs9.0000000000000083
Kitti Wongta, Mati Rattanasakalwong, Jantaluck Nuchanatanon, P. Charutragulchai, Vorapatu Tangsirapat
Although minimally invasive liver surgery has been increasingly practiced worldwide, the lack of experience is a barrier for numerous surgeons to initiate. This study aims to compare the outcome of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) by surgeons who begin to conduct both procedures through the same period. We retrospectively analyzed the demographic data, the perioperative data, and the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent liver resection for the treatment of liver tumors. All procedures were operated by three hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeons. In total 56 hepatectomies were operated on, 13 patients in the LLR group with an average Iwate score of 5, and 43 patients in the OLR group were included in the study. After propensity score matching, comparing 13 patients of each LLR and OLR groups, the operative time (316.5 vs 315.4 minutes, P = 0.98) and the amount of blood loss (929 vs 1500 mL, P = 0.23) were not different. The postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter in the LR group (6 vs 12 days, P = 0.009). The LLR group had a lower severity of the complications (P = 0.02), and the mortality rate was zero in both groups. The margin-free status did not differ between the LLR and OLR groups (92.3% vs 76.9%, P = 0.28). For HPB surgeons with limited experience, LLR is safe to meticulously proceed for liver lesions. The advantage of LLR is fewer complications, and most importantly the margin-free status is comparable between both groups.
尽管微创肝手术在世界范围内的应用越来越广泛，但缺乏经验是许多外科医生的一个障碍。本研究旨在比较在同一时期开始进行腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)和开放式肝切除术(OLR)的外科医生的结果。我们回顾性分析了接受肝切除术治疗肝脏肿瘤患者的人口统计学资料、围手术期资料和手术结果。所有手术均由三名肝胰胆外科医生进行。共行56例肝切除术，其中LLR组13例，平均Iwate评分为5分，OLR组43例。倾向评分匹配后，LLR组和OLR组各13例患者的手术时间(316.5 vs 315.4 min, P = 0.98)和出血量(929 vs 1500 mL, P = 0.23)差异无统计学意义。LR组术后住院时间明显缩短(6天vs 12天，P = 0.009)。LLR组并发症严重程度较低(P = 0.02)，两组死亡率均为零。无边缘状态在LLR组和OLR组之间没有差异(92.3% vs 76.9%， P = 0.28)。对于经验有限的HPB外科医生，LLR是安全的，可以谨慎地进行肝脏病变。LLR的优点是并发症较少，最重要的是两组间无切缘状态具有可比性。
{"title":"LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN LIVER RESECTION FOR TREATMENT OF LIVER TUMORS: EARLY EXPERIENCE OUTCOMES","authors":"Kitti Wongta, Mati Rattanasakalwong, Jantaluck Nuchanatanon, P. Charutragulchai, Vorapatu Tangsirapat","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000083","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Although minimally invasive liver surgery has been increasingly practiced worldwide, the lack of experience is a barrier for numerous surgeons to initiate. This study aims to compare the outcome of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) by surgeons who begin to conduct both procedures through the same period.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 We retrospectively analyzed the demographic data, the perioperative data, and the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent liver resection for the treatment of liver tumors. All procedures were operated by three hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeons.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 In total 56 hepatectomies were operated on, 13 patients in the LLR group with an average Iwate score of 5, and 43 patients in the OLR group were included in the study. After propensity score matching, comparing 13 patients of each LLR and OLR groups, the operative time (316.5 vs 315.4 minutes, P = 0.98) and the amount of blood loss (929 vs 1500 mL, P = 0.23) were not different. The postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter in the LR group (6 vs 12 days, P = 0.009). The LLR group had a lower severity of the complications (P = 0.02), and the mortality rate was zero in both groups. The margin-free status did not differ between the LLR and OLR groups (92.3% vs 76.9%, P = 0.28).\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 For HPB surgeons with limited experience, LLR is safe to meticulously proceed for liver lesions. The advantage of LLR is fewer complications, and most importantly the margin-free status is comparable between both groups.\u0000","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42313159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-18DOI: 10.1097/fs9.0000000000000078
B. Joob, V. Wiwanitkit
{"title":"Trends in Global Research for Treating COVID-19 vaccine related acute appendicitis: A Bibliographic Analysis","authors":"B. Joob, V. Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000078","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43085312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-18DOI: 10.1097/fs9.0000000000000079
Chu-Min Chou, Chung-Jing Wang, Y. Jou, M. Cheng, Cheng-Huang Shen, Chang-te Lin
To assess the outcome and safety of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (fURSL) in treating upper ureteral stones larger than 1 cm. Between July 2017 and June 2020, 218 patients underwent tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL for upper ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes and complications were evaluated by retrospective chart review. Immediate stone-free rates after the procedure were 100 % of patients for the tubeless mini-PCNL and 71.0 % of patients for the fURSL group (P = 0.004). The mean operative time per patient was 79.8 ± 21.8 minutes in the tubeless mini-PCNL group, and it was 99.7 ± 33.8 minutes in the fURSL groups (P = 0.009). The average hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.9 days in the tubeless mini-PCNL group and 1.5 ± 1.2 days in the fURSL group (P < 0.001). The rate of febrile episode for the tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL groups were 14.3 % and 2.3%, respectively (P = 0.028) Tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL are safe and feasible treatment options for proximal ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm. Tubeless mini-PCNL offers better outcome of higher stone-free rate and shorter operation time compared with fURSL, but with a higher rate of febrile complications and longer hospital stay.
{"title":"Comparison between Tubeless Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Flexible Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Calculi Larger than 1 cm","authors":"Chu-Min Chou, Chung-Jing Wang, Y. Jou, M. Cheng, Cheng-Huang Shen, Chang-te Lin","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000079","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 To assess the outcome and safety of tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (fURSL) in treating upper ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Between July 2017 and June 2020, 218 patients underwent tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL for upper ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes and complications were evaluated by retrospective chart review.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Immediate stone-free rates after the procedure were 100 % of patients for the tubeless mini-PCNL and 71.0 % of patients for the fURSL group (P = 0.004). The mean operative time per patient was 79.8 ± 21.8 minutes in the tubeless mini-PCNL group, and it was 99.7 ± 33.8 minutes in the fURSL groups (P = 0.009). The average hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.9 days in the tubeless mini-PCNL group and 1.5 ± 1.2 days in the fURSL group (P < 0.001). The rate of febrile episode for the tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL groups were 14.3 % and 2.3%, respectively (P = 0.028)\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Tubeless mini-PCNL and fURSL are safe and feasible treatment options for proximal ureteral calculi larger than 1 cm. Tubeless mini-PCNL offers better outcome of higher stone-free rate and shorter operation time compared with fURSL, but with a higher rate of febrile complications and longer hospital stay.\u0000","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41984665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-17DOI: 10.1097/fs9.0000000000000076
W. Sriwijitalai, V. Wiwanitkit
{"title":"New generation of COVID-19 vaccine, new form and new material – what to known in clinical surgery","authors":"W. Sriwijitalai, V. Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000076","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49367393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-17DOI: 10.1097/fs9.0000000000000077
W. Sriwijitalai, V. Wiwanitkit
{"title":"Heterologous vaccination, from rabies vaccine to COVID-19 vaccine: view in clinical surgery","authors":"W. Sriwijitalai, V. Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000077","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44698877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-13DOI: 10.1097/fs9.0000000000000075
T. N. Dang, V. A. Pham, T. H. Nguyen
Obturator hernia is a rare type of abdominal hernia. Preoperative diagnosis of obturator hernia is often challenging due to non-specific signs and symptoms, leading to late diagnosis and increased mortality. Laparoscopic repair has been suggested as one of the alternative options for complicated inguinal hernias. We describe a case series of 6 consecutive patients diagnosed with complicated obturator hernia and treated by laparoscopic repair. All patients were females, aged 81 to 90 years old. Most of them were underweight (BMI < 18.5). All cases presented with acute small bowel obstruction. All cases were unilateral obturator hernia. Concomitant femoral hernia existed in 3 cases (50%). Bowel resection was required in 2 cases due to bowel ischemia and perforation. Four of six cases were repaired using synthetic mesh, and the two remaining patients were treated with peritoneal closure and medial umbilical fold flap reinforcement. There were no postoperative deaths. Laparoscopic repair seems to be a safe and effective option for the treatment of complicated obturator hernia.
{"title":"LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENT OF COMPLICATED OBTURATOR HERNIA: A CASE SERIES OF 6 PATIENTS","authors":"T. N. Dang, V. A. Pham, T. H. Nguyen","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000075","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Obturator hernia is a rare type of abdominal hernia. Preoperative diagnosis of obturator hernia is often challenging due to non-specific signs and symptoms, leading to late diagnosis and increased mortality. Laparoscopic repair has been suggested as one of the alternative options for complicated inguinal hernias. We describe a case series of 6 consecutive patients diagnosed with complicated obturator hernia and treated by laparoscopic repair. All patients were females, aged 81 to 90 years old. Most of them were underweight (BMI < 18.5). All cases presented with acute small bowel obstruction. All cases were unilateral obturator hernia. Concomitant femoral hernia existed in 3 cases (50%). Bowel resection was required in 2 cases due to bowel ischemia and perforation. Four of six cases were repaired using synthetic mesh, and the two remaining patients were treated with peritoneal closure and medial umbilical fold flap reinforcement. There were no postoperative deaths. Laparoscopic repair seems to be a safe and effective option for the treatment of complicated obturator hernia.","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45835597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-08DOI: 10.1097/fs9.0000000000000074
Naohiro Yoshida, Kazuhiro Koikawa, T. Aoyagi, T. Ogata, M. Taniguchi
Invasive carcinoma or dysplasia (biliary intraepithelial neoplasia [BilIN]) is often found in the surgical stumps of biliary tract cancer. We investigated whether the presence of BilIN at the surgical margin is a risk factor for recurrence. Seventy-five consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for biliary tract cancer were included in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical margin status (negative, BilIN, or positive) and analyzed the postoperative disease recurrence rate and recurrence pattern by the status. The disease-free survival rate was significantly worse in the positive margin group than in the negative margin group (11 vs 18 months, p = 0.027). There were no statistical differences between the BilIN-positive group and the other two groups. In the multivariate analysis, infiltrative growth (INF) c (HR 3.348, 95%CI 1.368-8.195, p = 0.008) and pathological exhumed margin (pEM) (HR 2.670, 95%CI 1.097-6.495, p = 0.030) were independent recurrence factors. The margin status of BilIN was not associated with recurrence (HR 0.867, 95%CI 0.491-2.946, p = 0.687). The BilIN component at the surgical margin was not associated with short-term recurrence, but the pEM-positive and INFc were. INFc may be a potential predictive factor for recurrence.
{"title":"The existence of biliary intraepithelial neoplasia at resection margin is not a risk factor for recurrence of biliary tract cancer","authors":"Naohiro Yoshida, Kazuhiro Koikawa, T. Aoyagi, T. Ogata, M. Taniguchi","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000074","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Invasive carcinoma or dysplasia (biliary intraepithelial neoplasia [BilIN]) is often found in the surgical stumps of biliary tract cancer. We investigated whether the presence of BilIN at the surgical margin is a risk factor for recurrence.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Seventy-five consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for biliary tract cancer were included in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the surgical margin status (negative, BilIN, or positive) and analyzed the postoperative disease recurrence rate and recurrence pattern by the status.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The disease-free survival rate was significantly worse in the positive margin group than in the negative margin group (11 vs 18 months, p = 0.027). There were no statistical differences between the BilIN-positive group and the other two groups. In the multivariate analysis, infiltrative growth (INF) c (HR 3.348, 95%CI 1.368-8.195, p = 0.008) and pathological exhumed margin (pEM) (HR 2.670, 95%CI 1.097-6.495, p = 0.030) were independent recurrence factors. The margin status of BilIN was not associated with recurrence (HR 0.867, 95%CI 0.491-2.946, p = 0.687).\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The BilIN component at the surgical margin was not associated with short-term recurrence, but the pEM-positive and INFc were. INFc may be a potential predictive factor for recurrence.\u0000","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47167897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-27DOI: 10.1097/fs9.0000000000000071
Peng-chan Huang, Wen-Teng Yao, J. Jhuang, Cheng-Chia Tsai, Shiu-Jau Chen, Chih-Chuan Yang
{"title":"Systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma manifesting initially as scalp hematoma after an acute head injury: case report and literature review","authors":"Peng-chan Huang, Wen-Teng Yao, J. Jhuang, Cheng-Chia Tsai, Shiu-Jau Chen, Chih-Chuan Yang","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000071","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44651125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-26DOI: 10.1097/fs9.0000000000000073
R. Mungmunpuntipantip, V. Wiwanitkit
{"title":"Deaths among surgeons while on duty: an important issue in surgery and occupational medicine that should not be disregarded","authors":"R. Mungmunpuntipantip, V. Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000073","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45391922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：