Pub Date : 2025-11-17eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/24730114251388656
Esmee W M Engelmann, Jens A Halm, Tim Schepers
Background: Cuboid fractures are rare, and there is a scarcity in evidence of the long-term functional outcome of these fractures in literature. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcome, complications, quality of life, and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of cuboid fractures.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center, reviewing patients ≥16 years with cuboid fractures operated between 2014 and 2024. Functional outcome was assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score, and EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire. Complications such as nonunion, infection, and secondary arthrodesis were recorded.
Results: The total cohort of surgically managed patients was 45 (28 females and 17 males), with a median age of 39.1 (IQR, 24.2) years and median follow-up of 67.0 (IQR, 91) months. A subset of 42 patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation within 4 weeks after the injury. Overall, AOFAS was fair to good (median 76, range 34-100) and treatment satisfaction was high (mean 8.7/10, SD 1.1). There were no infections and no cases of nonunion. Secondary calcaneocuboid joint fusion was required in only 2 patients. In multivariate linear regression analysis, the type of fixation (cuboid plate) was significantly associated with better AOFAS (P = .03, R2 0.11).
Conclusion: Surgical intervention aimed at restoring articular congruence and column length with cuboid plate fixation can lead to union with overall fair to good functional outcome and high patient satisfaction.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
{"title":"Long-term Functional Outcome and Satisfaction After Surgical Management of Cuboid Fractures.","authors":"Esmee W M Engelmann, Jens A Halm, Tim Schepers","doi":"10.1177/24730114251388656","DOIUrl":"10.1177/24730114251388656","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cuboid fractures are rare, and there is a scarcity in evidence of the long-term functional outcome of these fractures in literature. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcome, complications, quality of life, and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of cuboid fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center, reviewing patients ≥16 years with cuboid fractures operated between 2014 and 2024. Functional outcome was assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score, and EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire. Complications such as nonunion, infection, and secondary arthrodesis were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cohort of surgically managed patients was 45 (28 females and 17 males), with a median age of 39.1 (IQR, 24.2) years and median follow-up of 67.0 (IQR, 91) months. A subset of 42 patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation within 4 weeks after the injury. Overall, AOFAS was fair to good (median 76, range 34-100) and treatment satisfaction was high (mean 8.7/10, SD 1.1). There were no infections and no cases of nonunion. Secondary calcaneocuboid joint fusion was required in only 2 patients. In multivariate linear regression analysis, the type of fixation (cuboid plate) was significantly associated with better AOFAS (<i>P</i> = .03, <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical intervention aimed at restoring articular congruence and column length with cuboid plate fixation can lead to union with overall fair to good functional outcome and high patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 4","pages":"24730114251388656"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12623629/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145556498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/24730114251394009
Kaissar Yammine, Joseph Mouawad, Youssef Jamaleddine, Chahine Assi
Background: Very few studies reported outcomes of common conservative surgeries with antibiotic-impregnated cement when treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). The aim of this descriptive study is to report the results of the association of cement with a specific type of toe-sparing resection, combining total metatarsectomy/phalangectomy (internal pedal amputation) with partial bone excision, for acute on chronic forefoot DFO.
Methods: Six patients with confirmed acute on chronic DFO were included. A probe-to-bone test was performed for open wounds. For all patients, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and pathology were conducted in search of osteomyelitis signs. The level of resection was defined as 1 cm away from the contrast enhancement shown on MRI. The polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement was prepared with 2 g of vancomycin before being placed in the defect. A minimum period of 6 months of clinical follow-up was set.
Results: All patients demonstrated wound healing at last follow-up with normalized C-reactive protein. There were no clinical signs of osteomyelitis recurrence. One wound infection was recorded 4 weeks postoperatively and treated successfully with debridement and lavage. None of the cement had to be removed or exchanged. Subjectively, 5 patients were extremely satisfied scoring 5/5 on Likert scale, and 1 patient was moderately satisfied (3/5). All patients were able to walk with full weight using insoles.
Conclusion: This preliminary report demonstrated that PMMA cement could be a viable option when used to locally control infection following an internal pedal amputation for acute on chronic DFO of the toes. In addition to the high rate of healing, the esthetical result was highly appreciated by the patients.
{"title":"Acute on Chronic Diabetic Forefoot Osteomyelitis Treated With Internal Pedal Amputation and Cement: A Preliminary Report.","authors":"Kaissar Yammine, Joseph Mouawad, Youssef Jamaleddine, Chahine Assi","doi":"10.1177/24730114251394009","DOIUrl":"10.1177/24730114251394009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Very few studies reported outcomes of common conservative surgeries with antibiotic-impregnated cement when treating diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). The aim of this descriptive study is to report the results of the association of cement with a specific type of toe-sparing resection, combining total metatarsectomy/phalangectomy (internal pedal amputation) with partial bone excision, for acute on chronic forefoot DFO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six patients with confirmed acute on chronic DFO were included. A probe-to-bone test was performed for open wounds. For all patients, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and pathology were conducted in search of osteomyelitis signs. The level of resection was defined as 1 cm away from the contrast enhancement shown on MRI. The polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement was prepared with 2 g of vancomycin before being placed in the defect. A minimum period of 6 months of clinical follow-up was set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients demonstrated wound healing at last follow-up with normalized C-reactive protein. There were no clinical signs of osteomyelitis recurrence. One wound infection was recorded 4 weeks postoperatively and treated successfully with debridement and lavage. None of the cement had to be removed or exchanged. Subjectively, 5 patients were extremely satisfied scoring 5/5 on Likert scale, and 1 patient was moderately satisfied (3/5). All patients were able to walk with full weight using insoles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary report demonstrated that PMMA cement could be a viable option when used to locally control infection following an internal pedal amputation for acute on chronic DFO of the toes. In addition to the high rate of healing, the esthetical result was highly appreciated by the patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 4","pages":"24730114251394009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12623630/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145556547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-16eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/24730114251394013
Michael W Stickels, Matthew Scheller, David Vier, David E Jaffe
Background: Despite the safety and versatility of circular external fixators (CEFs) for many indications, there is limited information on their contemporary usage and the factors contributing to their potential underutilization. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of contemporary CEF use, characterize barriers to adoption, and identify potential solutions among American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) members.
Methods: A multibranched survey was designed for distribution to all active practicing members of the AOFAS to collect data on demographics, training background, CEF usage profile, provider opinions, barriers to device adoption, and factors that could encourage greater use. Data were collected through Qualtrics XM. Statistical analysis analyzing respondent differences included descriptive statistics, χ2 tests for independence, and unpaired t tests.
Results: Of 169 participants, 27.81% reported not using CEFs in their practice despite 94.08% of respondents agreeing that their use is critical for certain patients. Overall, 70.21% of nonusers believed it could have a role in their practice but had hesitations. In addition, 59.76% of participants received minimal to no exposure in residency, and this was a significant predictor for current usage (P = .0119). CEFs are most commonly used for Charcot neuroarthropathy (86.07%), infection management (83.60%), and other deformity corrections (65.67%). Nonusers are more likely to believe CEFs take too long to assemble intraoperatively, express greater concern about postoperative burden, and are less confident in postoperative care compared to users (all P < .01). The most popular interventions that would facilitate usage were access to longitudinal mentorship, further technological advancement, and attending non-industry-sponsored courses.
Conclusion: Perceived lengthy operative time, postoperative burden, and lack of postoperative management confidence were predominant reasons for the lack of CEF use. This survey suggests that these barriers could be addressed by more exposure during training, attending non-industry-sponsored courses, and longitudinal mentorship.
Level of evidence: Level IV, cross-sectional study.
{"title":"Circular External Fixation Use Among Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons: A National Survey Study.","authors":"Michael W Stickels, Matthew Scheller, David Vier, David E Jaffe","doi":"10.1177/24730114251394013","DOIUrl":"10.1177/24730114251394013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the safety and versatility of circular external fixators (CEFs) for many indications, there is limited information on their contemporary usage and the factors contributing to their potential underutilization. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of contemporary CEF use, characterize barriers to adoption, and identify potential solutions among American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multibranched survey was designed for distribution to all active practicing members of the AOFAS to collect data on demographics, training background, CEF usage profile, provider opinions, barriers to device adoption, and factors that could encourage greater use. Data were collected through Qualtrics XM. Statistical analysis analyzing respondent differences included descriptive statistics, χ<sup>2</sup> tests for independence, and unpaired <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 169 participants, 27.81% reported not using CEFs in their practice despite 94.08% of respondents agreeing that their use is critical for certain patients. Overall, 70.21% of nonusers believed it could have a role in their practice but had hesitations. In addition, 59.76% of participants received minimal to no exposure in residency, and this was a significant predictor for current usage (<i>P</i> = .0119). CEFs are most commonly used for Charcot neuroarthropathy (86.07%), infection management (83.60%), and other deformity corrections (65.67%). Nonusers are more likely to believe CEFs take too long to assemble intraoperatively, express greater concern about postoperative burden, and are less confident in postoperative care compared to users (all <i>P</i> < .01). The most popular interventions that would facilitate usage were access to longitudinal mentorship, further technological advancement, and attending non-industry-sponsored courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perceived lengthy operative time, postoperative burden, and lack of postoperative management confidence were predominant reasons for the lack of CEF use. This survey suggests that these barriers could be addressed by more exposure during training, attending non-industry-sponsored courses, and longitudinal mentorship.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, cross-sectional study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 4","pages":"24730114251394013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12623634/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145556576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-16eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/24730114251388097
Gnaneswar Chundi, Abhiram Dawar, Ian Briggs, David B Ahn, Avani A Chopra, Zachary Fuller, Sheldon S Lin, Tuckerman Jones
Background: Most cases of tibia and fibula shaft fractures are treated without fixation of the fibula. However, there are some cases where fibula fixation is thought to improve patient outcome. The fibula can be stabilized by surface plating or medullary nailing but literature comparing these 2 fixation techniques is limited. This study evaluates postoperative complications and readmission rates between intramedullary (IM) nailing and surface plating of fibular fractures in patients undergoing concomitant tibial osteosynthesis.
Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2021, we identified patients undergoing tibial open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal tibial fractures with concurrent fibular fixation using either IM nailing or plate fixation were identified. Propensity score matching was performed to balance demographic and clinical covariates. The prespecified primary endpoint was overall 90-day wound/infectious complications; secondary outcomes included specific complications and 30- and 90-day readmissions.
Results: After matching, 3497 IM nailing cases and 3381 plating cases were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. IM fixation was associated with significantly lower rates of overall complications (7.5% vs 9.8%, P = .001), wound dehiscence (0.6% vs 1.8%, P < .001), infection (1.3% vs 2.8%, P < .001), malunion (0.4% vs 0.9%, P = .018), and abscess formation (0.1% vs 0.4%, P = .039). Although 30-day and total readmission rates were similar, the plate fixation group had significantly higher rates of infection- and wound-related readmissions.
Conclusion: In patients undergoing tibial ORIF for distal tibial fractures, adjunctive fibular IM nailing is associated with fewer wound-related complications and infections compared with plate fixation, without compromising union or readmission rates. IM nailing may be a lower-morbidity alternative for selected patients, pending prospective studies that incorporate fracture morphology and functional outcomes.
Level of evidence: Level III, prognostic.
背景:大多数胫骨和腓骨干骨折的治疗不需要固定腓骨。然而,也有一些病例认为腓骨固定可以改善患者的预后。腓骨可以通过表面电镀或髓内钉固定,但比较这两种固定技术的文献有限。本研究评估髓内钉(IM)和表面电镀治疗腓骨骨折合并胫骨骨融合术患者的术后并发症和再入院率。方法:使用2016年至2021年的全国再入院数据库(NRD),我们确定了接受胫骨切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗胫骨远端骨折并同时使用IM钉或钢板固定腓骨的患者。进行倾向评分匹配以平衡人口统计学和临床协变量。预先指定的主要终点是总体90天伤口/感染并发症;次要结局包括特殊并发症和30天和90天的再入院。结果:经配对,共纳入髓内钉3497例,电镀3381例。各组间基线特征相似。IM固定与总体并发症发生率显著降低相关(7.5% vs 9.8%, P =。0.001),伤口开裂(0.6% vs 1.8%, P P P =。018)和脓肿形成(0.1% vs 0.4%, P = 0.039)。虽然30天再入院率和总再入院率相似,但钢板固定组感染和伤口相关再入院率明显较高。结论:在胫骨远端骨折接受胫骨ORIF治疗的患者中,与钢板固定相比,辅助腓骨IM钉入与伤口相关的并发症和感染较少,且不影响愈合或再入院率。对于特定的患者,内钉可能是一种低发病率的选择,有待于结合骨折形态和功能结果的前瞻性研究。证据等级:III级,预后不良。
{"title":"Intramedullary Nailing vs Plate Fixation of the Fibula in the Setting of Distal Tibial Fractures Requiring ORIF: National Readmissions Database Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.","authors":"Gnaneswar Chundi, Abhiram Dawar, Ian Briggs, David B Ahn, Avani A Chopra, Zachary Fuller, Sheldon S Lin, Tuckerman Jones","doi":"10.1177/24730114251388097","DOIUrl":"10.1177/24730114251388097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most cases of tibia and fibula shaft fractures are treated without fixation of the fibula. However, there are some cases where fibula fixation is thought to improve patient outcome. The fibula can be stabilized by surface plating or medullary nailing but literature comparing these 2 fixation techniques is limited. This study evaluates postoperative complications and readmission rates between intramedullary (IM) nailing and surface plating of fibular fractures in patients undergoing concomitant tibial osteosynthesis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2021, we identified patients undergoing tibial open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal tibial fractures with concurrent fibular fixation using either IM nailing or plate fixation were identified. Propensity score matching was performed to balance demographic and clinical covariates. The prespecified primary endpoint was overall 90-day wound/infectious complications; secondary outcomes included specific complications and 30- and 90-day readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 3497 IM nailing cases and 3381 plating cases were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. IM fixation was associated with significantly lower rates of overall complications (7.5% vs 9.8%, <i>P</i> = .001), wound dehiscence (0.6% vs 1.8%, <i>P</i> < .001), infection (1.3% vs 2.8%, <i>P</i> < .001), malunion (0.4% vs 0.9%, <i>P</i> = .018), and abscess formation (0.1% vs 0.4%, <i>P</i> = .039). Although 30-day and total readmission rates were similar, the plate fixation group had significantly higher rates of infection- and wound-related readmissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing tibial ORIF for distal tibial fractures, adjunctive fibular IM nailing is associated with fewer wound-related complications and infections compared with plate fixation, without compromising union or readmission rates. IM nailing may be a lower-morbidity alternative for selected patients, pending prospective studies that incorporate fracture morphology and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, prognostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 4","pages":"24730114251388097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12620553/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145548518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-14eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/24730114251387694
William Collins, Nikolas Drobetz, Cyrus Mehta
{"title":"Peroneal Nerve Palsy After a Minimally Displaced Weber B Fibula Fracture: A Rare Case of Extensor Retinaculum Syndrome.","authors":"William Collins, Nikolas Drobetz, Cyrus Mehta","doi":"10.1177/24730114251387694","DOIUrl":"10.1177/24730114251387694","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 4","pages":"24730114251387694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12619891/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-12eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/24730114251394608
Charles L Saltzman, Robert B Anderson, Brad D Blankenhorn, John T Campbell, Timothy R Daniels, Ellie Pinsker, Stefan Rammelt, Robert A Vander Griend
{"title":"Welcoming Clinical Trial Protocols to <i>Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics</i>.","authors":"Charles L Saltzman, Robert B Anderson, Brad D Blankenhorn, John T Campbell, Timothy R Daniels, Ellie Pinsker, Stefan Rammelt, Robert A Vander Griend","doi":"10.1177/24730114251394608","DOIUrl":"10.1177/24730114251394608","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 4","pages":"24730114251394608"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12615970/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-12eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/24730114251386735
Esten Konstad Haanæs, Frede Jon Frihagen, Greger Lønne, Aksel Paulsen, Jostein Skorpa Nilsen, Martin Greger Gregersen, Marius Molund
Background: Suturing the deep posterior deltoid ligament in unstable ankle fractures is novel to established treatment. Some cadaveric and clinical trials support that adding deltoid ligament repair to plating of the lateral fracture will improve stability restoration.
Objectives: We will investigate the effects of deep deltoid ligament repair on patient-reported function, radiologic stability parameters, and the incidence of ankle osteoarthritis and the possible side effects from this additional procedure. The medial ankle injury patterns found will be described.
Study design: A randomised controlled nonblinded multicentre trial.
Methods: A total of 120 patients with Lauge Hansen SER 4B ankle fractures will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to conventional plating of the lateral malleolus only or additional suture of the deep deltoid ligament. The primary end point was patient-reported function measured in Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at 1 and 2 years. The secondary end points included Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS), Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM), VAS pain, and EuroQol-5D-5L scores; rates of treatment-related adverse events, reoperations, and incidence of posttraumatic arthritis; and comparison of side-to-side differences in tibiotalar medial clear space from bilateral weightbearing ankle radiographs and gravity stress on group level.
背景:在不稳定踝关节骨折中缝合深后三角韧带是一种新的治疗方法。一些尸体和临床试验支持在外侧骨折钢板中加入三角韧带修复可以提高稳定性恢复。目的:我们将研究深三角韧带修复对患者报告的功能、放射学稳定性参数、踝关节骨关节炎发生率的影响以及该附加手术可能产生的副作用。将描述发现的内侧踝关节损伤模式。研究设计:随机对照非盲法多中心试验。方法:共120例Lauge Hansen SER 4B踝关节骨折患者将随机(1:1比例)分为常规外踝钢板或深三角韧带缝合两组。主要终点是患者在1年和2年的Olerud-Molander踝关节评分(OMAS)中报告的功能。次要终点包括自我报告足踝关节评分(SEFAS)、踝关节骨折康复测量结果(A-FORM)、VAS疼痛和EuroQol-5D-5L评分;治疗相关不良事件、再手术率和创伤后关节炎发病率;比较双侧负重踝关节片胫骨内侧间隙和组内重力应力的两侧差异。
{"title":"The Benefit of Repairing the Deltoid Ligament in Unstable Ankle Fractures: Patient-Reported Functional Outcome and Radiological Stability Measurements; a Clinical Trial Protocol.","authors":"Esten Konstad Haanæs, Frede Jon Frihagen, Greger Lønne, Aksel Paulsen, Jostein Skorpa Nilsen, Martin Greger Gregersen, Marius Molund","doi":"10.1177/24730114251386735","DOIUrl":"10.1177/24730114251386735","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suturing the deep posterior deltoid ligament in unstable ankle fractures is novel to established treatment. Some cadaveric and clinical trials support that adding deltoid ligament repair to plating of the lateral fracture will improve stability restoration.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We will investigate the effects of deep deltoid ligament repair on patient-reported function, radiologic stability parameters, and the incidence of ankle osteoarthritis and the possible side effects from this additional procedure. The medial ankle injury patterns found will be described.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A randomised controlled nonblinded multicentre trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients with Lauge Hansen SER 4B ankle fractures will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to conventional plating of the lateral malleolus only or additional suture of the deep deltoid ligament. The primary end point was patient-reported function measured in Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at 1 and 2 years. The secondary end points included Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS), Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM), VAS pain, and EuroQol-5D-5L scores; rates of treatment-related adverse events, reoperations, and incidence of posttraumatic arthritis; and comparison of side-to-side differences in tibiotalar medial clear space from bilateral weightbearing ankle radiographs and gravity stress on group level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 4","pages":"24730114251386735"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12615956/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The optimal surgical procedures for chronic Lisfranc injuries are controversial. This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of fiber tape fixation for chronic Lisfranc injuries under early full weightbearing protocols.
Methods: This study included 11 feet from 10 patients who underwent fiber tape fixation for chronic Lisfranc injuries (undiagnosed for more than 6 weeks from injuries). All patients were allowed full weightbearing with normal shoes 4 weeks after the surgery. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated with a first cuneiform (C1)-second metatarsal (M2) distance from weightbearing anteroposterior plain foot radiography.
Results: The median follow-up period was 12 months (IQR, 12-16). The median C1-M2 distance improved significantly from 3.3 mm (IQR, 2.9-5.2) to 1.6 mm (IQR, 1.5-2.2). The pain, physical functioning, social functioning, shoe-related, and general health subscales of SAFE-Q improved significantly after the surgery, whereas the sports subscale did not reach statistical significance (P = .063). Five patients, who regularly participated in sports activities, were able to return to their preinjury sport level by 12 months. There were no complications, such as infection, nerve or tendon injuries, or hardware-related discomfort, in the entire cohort.
Conclusion: The fiber tape fixation device under early full weightbearing protocols led to short-term improvements in pain, function, and radiographic stability for chronic Lisfranc injuries, with no observed complications.
Level of evidence: Level IV, case series.
背景:慢性Lisfranc损伤的最佳手术方式存在争议。本研究旨在证明纤维带固定治疗早期完全负重方案下慢性Lisfranc损伤的临床结果。方法:本研究包括10例接受纤维带固定治疗慢性Lisfranc损伤(损伤后6周以上未确诊)的患者的11脚。术后4周,所有患者均可穿正常鞋完全负重。临床结果通过自我管理足部评估问卷进行评估。采用负重前后位平足x线片第一楔形骨(C1)-第二跖骨(M2)距离评估影像学结果。结果:中位随访时间为12个月(IQR, 12-16)。中位C1-M2距离从3.3 mm (IQR, 2.9-5.2)显著改善到1.6 mm (IQR, 1.5-2.2)。SAFE-Q的疼痛、身体功能、社交功能、鞋相关和一般健康量表在手术后显著改善,而运动量表没有达到统计学意义(P = 0.063)。5名定期参加体育活动的患者在12个月后恢复到损伤前的运动水平。在整个队列中没有并发症,如感染,神经或肌腱损伤,或硬件相关的不适。结论:纤维带固定装置在早期全负重方案下可短期改善慢性Lisfranc损伤的疼痛、功能和影像学稳定性,未观察到并发症。证据等级:四级,案例系列。
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Fiber-Tape Flexible Fixation for Chronic Lisfranc Injuries.","authors":"Kensei Yoshimoto, Mitsuki Kumaki, Takumi Koseki, Masahiko Noguchi, Ayako Tominaga, Ken Okazaki","doi":"10.1177/24730114251388428","DOIUrl":"10.1177/24730114251388428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal surgical procedures for chronic Lisfranc injuries are controversial. This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of fiber tape fixation for chronic Lisfranc injuries under early full weightbearing protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 11 feet from 10 patients who underwent fiber tape fixation for chronic Lisfranc injuries (undiagnosed for more than 6 weeks from injuries). All patients were allowed full weightbearing with normal shoes 4 weeks after the surgery. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated with a first cuneiform (C1)-second metatarsal (M2) distance from weightbearing anteroposterior plain foot radiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period was 12 months (IQR, 12-16). The median C1-M2 distance improved significantly from 3.3 mm (IQR, 2.9-5.2) to 1.6 mm (IQR, 1.5-2.2). The pain, physical functioning, social functioning, shoe-related, and general health subscales of SAFE-Q improved significantly after the surgery, whereas the sports subscale did not reach statistical significance (<i>P</i> = .063). Five patients, who regularly participated in sports activities, were able to return to their preinjury sport level by 12 months. There were no complications, such as infection, nerve or tendon injuries, or hardware-related discomfort, in the entire cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fiber tape fixation device under early full weightbearing protocols led to short-term improvements in pain, function, and radiographic stability for chronic Lisfranc injuries, with no observed complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 4","pages":"24730114251388428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12592639/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145481501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-28eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/24730114251386023
Amal Chidda, Jaeyoung Kim, Ivan Golub, Bonnie Y Chien, John Y Kwon
Visual abstract.
视觉抽象。
{"title":"Intra-articular Posterior Tibial Tendon Entrapment in an Ankle Fracture Mimicking Syndesmotic Malreduction: A Case Report.","authors":"Amal Chidda, Jaeyoung Kim, Ivan Golub, Bonnie Y Chien, John Y Kwon","doi":"10.1177/24730114251386023","DOIUrl":"10.1177/24730114251386023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 4","pages":"24730114251386023"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12576084/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145430542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-28eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1177/24730114251386025
Albert T Anastasio, Nicholas R Kiritsis, Isabel R Shaffrey, Francois Lintz, Canon Cornelius, Nacime S Mansur, John Dankert, Conor O'Neill, Cesar de Cesar Netto
Background: Ankle arthrodesis (AA) is a common treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis, chronic instability, and degenerative deformity. Although minimally invasive arthroscopic techniques may reduce soft tissue disruption, postoperative pain, and related morbidity, open techniques may be beneficial for treatment of patients with aberrant anatomy, insufficient bone stock, or complex deformity. This study aimed to determine whether arthroscopic AA is associated with lower rates of adverse events, pseudarthrosis, and health care use compared with open AA techniques at short-term and long-term intervals.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX research network. Patients undergoing AA were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for arthroscopic (CPT 29899, n = 879) and open (CPT 27870, n = 10 604) procedures. Two cohorts were defined and propensity score-matched on age, sex, race, body mass index, nicotine dependence, chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 873 each). Outcomes were evaluated within 30 days, 90 days, and 2 years.
Results: The arthroscopic AA cohort experienced significantly lower rates of any adverse event, infection, and hospital admission within the 30-day and 90-day outcome windows. Arthroscopic AA was associated with fewer emergency department visits and wound dehiscence within 90 days of surgery. A diagnosed pseudarthrosis within 2 years was more common in the open arthrodesis cohort. Rates of short-term myocardial infarction, cerebral infarct, transfusion, pulmonary embolism, and hematoma did not differ.
Conclusion: Arthroscopic AA was associated with significantly lower rates of medical complications at the short-term intervals, in addition to lower rates of nonunion within 2 years. Although observational, propensity-matched data are consistent with fewer short-term medical complications and lower 2-year nonunion after arthroscopic AA, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the inability to assess the degree of coronal or sagittal plane deformity in the included cases.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
背景:踝关节融合术(AA)是终末期踝关节关节炎、慢性不稳定和退行性畸形的常用治疗方法。虽然微创关节镜技术可以减少软组织破裂、术后疼痛和相关的发病率,但开放技术可能有利于治疗解剖异常、骨库存不足或复杂畸形的患者。本研究旨在确定在短期和长期的时间间隔内,与开放式AA技术相比,关节镜下AA是否与较低的不良事件发生率、假关节发生率和医疗保健使用率相关。方法:采用TriNetX研究网络进行回顾性分析。采用关节镜手术(CPT 29899, n = 879)和开放手术(CPT 27870, n = 10604)的现行程序术语(CPT)代码对AA患者进行鉴定。定义了两个队列,并根据年龄、性别、种族、体重指数、尼古丁依赖、慢性肾脏疾病和2型糖尿病进行倾向评分匹配(n = 873)。结果分别在30天、90天和2年内进行评估。结果:关节镜AA组在30天和90天预后窗口内的任何不良事件、感染和住院率均显著降低。关节镜下AA与手术90天内急诊就诊和伤口裂开的减少有关。在开放性关节融合术队列中,2年内诊断出假关节更常见。短期心肌梗死、脑梗死、输血、肺栓塞和血肿的发生率没有差异。结论:关节镜下AA与短期内较低的医疗并发症发生率以及较低的2年内不愈合率相关。尽管观察性倾向匹配的数据与关节镜下AA术后较少的短期医疗并发症和较低的2年骨不连相一致,但由于无法评估纳入病例的冠状面或矢状面畸形程度,因此应谨慎解释结果。证据等级:III级,回顾性队列研究。
{"title":"Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis vs Open Ankle Arthrodesis: A Propensity-Matched, Retrospective Database Analysis of Medical Complications and 2-Year Nonunion Rates.","authors":"Albert T Anastasio, Nicholas R Kiritsis, Isabel R Shaffrey, Francois Lintz, Canon Cornelius, Nacime S Mansur, John Dankert, Conor O'Neill, Cesar de Cesar Netto","doi":"10.1177/24730114251386025","DOIUrl":"10.1177/24730114251386025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ankle arthrodesis (AA) is a common treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis, chronic instability, and degenerative deformity. Although minimally invasive arthroscopic techniques may reduce soft tissue disruption, postoperative pain, and related morbidity, open techniques may be beneficial for treatment of patients with aberrant anatomy, insufficient bone stock, or complex deformity. This study aimed to determine whether arthroscopic AA is associated with lower rates of adverse events, pseudarthrosis, and health care use compared with open AA techniques at short-term and long-term intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX research network. Patients undergoing AA were identified using <i>Current Procedural Terminology</i> (<i>CPT</i>) codes for arthroscopic (<i>CPT</i> 29899, n = 879) and open (<i>CPT</i> 27870, n = 10 604) procedures. Two cohorts were defined and propensity score-matched on age, sex, race, body mass index, nicotine dependence, chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 873 each). Outcomes were evaluated within 30 days, 90 days, and 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The arthroscopic AA cohort experienced significantly lower rates of any adverse event, infection, and hospital admission within the 30-day and 90-day outcome windows. Arthroscopic AA was associated with fewer emergency department visits and wound dehiscence within 90 days of surgery. A diagnosed pseudarthrosis within 2 years was more common in the open arthrodesis cohort. Rates of short-term myocardial infarction, cerebral infarct, transfusion, pulmonary embolism, and hematoma did not differ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arthroscopic AA was associated with significantly lower rates of medical complications at the short-term intervals, in addition to lower rates of nonunion within 2 years. Although observational, propensity-matched data are consistent with fewer short-term medical complications and lower 2-year nonunion after arthroscopic AA, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the inability to assess the degree of coronal or sagittal plane deformity in the included cases.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 4","pages":"24730114251386025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12576266/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145430553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}