Introduction: Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation (LLPS), tumor microenvironment (TME), and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) all have varying degrees of influence on the expression regulation of tumors. However, research on the association of these three in pancreatic cancer (PC) still requires further exploration. This study seeks to establish the relationships among these three themes through bioinformatics and to identify biomarkers that can predict the prognosis of PC patients.
Methods: Data sets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) are obtained from the UCSC platform. lncRNAs associated with the LLPS and TME gene sets are screened, and model lncRNAs are identified through comprehensive analysis conducted with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and cox proportional hazards (COX) regression. Additionally, the predictive efficacy of the model lncRNAs is validated through multiple databases and cohorts. Furthermore, the expression of the model lncRNAs is validated at a biological level.
Results: A comprehensive analysis establishes an optimal combination consisting of 5 lncRNAs. The Kaplan-Meier curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each cohort demonstrates the effectiveness of the model lncRNAs characteristics. Additionally, the COX regression analysis of clinical characteristics and the analysis of mutation data further indicates the stability of the model lncRNAs. Furthermore, the expression levels of model lncRNAs in cell lines are consistent with the analysis results.
Conclusion: The model lncRNAs identified in this study, which are correlated with LLPS and TME, demonstrate significant potential as independent biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of PC patients.
{"title":"lncRNA-based prognostic model for pancreatic cancer centered on the TME with exploratory LLPS connections.","authors":"Yaqing Wei, Xiguang Sun, Changjun Ding, Yifei Wang, Zheran Lu, Chenhui Zhang, Hao Yao, Hao Huang","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1753321","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1753321","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation (LLPS), tumor microenvironment (TME), and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) all have varying degrees of influence on the expression regulation of tumors. However, research on the association of these three in pancreatic cancer (PC) still requires further exploration. This study seeks to establish the relationships among these three themes through bioinformatics and to identify biomarkers that can predict the prognosis of PC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data sets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) are obtained from the UCSC platform. lncRNAs associated with the LLPS and TME gene sets are screened, and model lncRNAs are identified through comprehensive analysis conducted with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and cox proportional hazards (COX) regression. Additionally, the predictive efficacy of the model lncRNAs is validated through multiple databases and cohorts. Furthermore, the expression of the model lncRNAs is validated at a biological level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comprehensive analysis establishes an optimal combination consisting of 5 lncRNAs. The Kaplan-Meier curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each cohort demonstrates the effectiveness of the model lncRNAs characteristics. Additionally, the COX regression analysis of clinical characteristics and the analysis of mutation data further indicates the stability of the model lncRNAs. Furthermore, the expression levels of model lncRNAs in cell lines are consistent with the analysis results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model lncRNAs identified in this study, which are correlated with LLPS and TME, demonstrate significant potential as independent biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of PC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1753321"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12875940/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Radical resection is the modality to cure patients with ICC. Thus, surgical quality is the key prognostic factor for survival. Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional composite indicator reflecting surgical care quality. However, the association between neoadjuvant therapies-particularly those incorporating targeted and/or immunotherapeutic agents into chemotherapy regimens-and the attainment of TO in ICC remains unclear and warrants further investigation.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 187 patients with ICC who underwent curative resection. TO was defined as the simultaneous achievement of R0 resection, with no perioperative blood transfusion, no postoperative complications, no mortality within 30 days, no unplanned readmission within 30 days, and a postoperative length of stay not exceeding the 75th percentile. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with TO, with further analysis focused on the role of neoadjuvant therapy. Cox regression was used to evaluate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), and a prognostic nomogram incorporating TO was developed and validated.
Results: TO was achieved in 53 patients (28.3%), which was significantly associated with improved OS (p = 0.003) and recurrence-free survival (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified neoadjuvant therapy [odds ratio (OR) = 2.687, p = 0.014], higher body mass index, higher albumin levels, lower carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and reduced blood loss as independent predictors of TO. Combination neoadjuvant regimens (chemotherapy plus targeted/immunotherapy; OR = 2.647, p = 0.009) were the primary contributors to this positive association. A nomogram integrating TO, lymph node metastasis, prothrombin time, and adjuvant therapy demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy for survival (1-year area under the curve = 0.891).
Conclusion: Achieving TO is associated with significantly improved survival in patients with ICC. Combined neoadjuvant therapy, including targeted or immunotherapy, is an independent positive predictor of TO, which challenges conventional perspectives. The proposed TO-integrated nomogram is a practical tool for prognostic prediction and surgical quality assessment.
背景:肝内胆管癌(ICC)是一种预后差的高度侵袭性恶性肿瘤。根治性切除是治疗ICC患者的主要方法。因此,手术质量是生存的关键预后因素。教科书预后(TO)是反映手术护理质量的多维复合指标。然而,新辅助治疗-特别是那些将靶向和/或免疫治疗药物纳入化疗方案-与ICC中TO的实现之间的关系尚不清楚,需要进一步研究。材料和方法:本回顾性研究分析了187例行根治性切除的ICC患者。TO定义为同时实现R0切除,无围手术期输血,无术后并发症,30天内无死亡,30天内无意外再入院,术后住院时间不超过75个百分位数。我们使用逻辑回归来确定与to相关的因素,并进一步分析新辅助治疗的作用。Cox回归用于评估总生存期(OS)的预后因素,并开发并验证了包含to的预后nomogram。结果:53例患者(28.3%)达到了TO,与改善的OS (p = 0.003)和无复发生存率(p < 0.001)显著相关。多变量分析发现,新辅助治疗[比值比(OR) = 2.687, p = 0.014]、较高的体重指数、较高的白蛋白水平、较低的癌胚抗原水平和减少的失血量是TO的独立预测因素。联合新辅助方案(化疗加靶向/免疫治疗;OR = 2.647, p = 0.009)是这种正相关的主要因素。结合TO,淋巴结转移,凝血酶原时间和辅助治疗的nomogram显示了极好的生存率预测准确性(1年曲线下面积= 0.891)。结论:达到TO与ICC患者生存率的显著提高相关。联合新辅助治疗,包括靶向或免疫治疗,是一个独立的阳性预测因子,这挑战了传统的观点。所提出的to综合nomogram是一种实用的预后预测和手术质量评估工具。
{"title":"Determinants and survival benefits of achieving textbook outcome for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.","authors":"Jiawei Hu, Yihang Wang, Haoran Diao, Shuangda Miao, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Qi Li, Yanzhi Pan, Yun Jin, Yuanquan Yu, Jiangtao Li","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1737204","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1737204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Radical resection is the modality to cure patients with ICC. Thus, surgical quality is the key prognostic factor for survival. Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional composite indicator reflecting surgical care quality. However, the association between neoadjuvant therapies-particularly those incorporating targeted and/or immunotherapeutic agents into chemotherapy regimens-and the attainment of TO in ICC remains unclear and warrants further investigation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 187 patients with ICC who underwent curative resection. TO was defined as the simultaneous achievement of R0 resection, with no perioperative blood transfusion, no postoperative complications, no mortality within 30 days, no unplanned readmission within 30 days, and a postoperative length of stay not exceeding the 75th percentile. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with TO, with further analysis focused on the role of neoadjuvant therapy. Cox regression was used to evaluate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), and a prognostic nomogram incorporating TO was developed and validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TO was achieved in 53 patients (28.3%), which was significantly associated with improved OS (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and recurrence-free survival (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified neoadjuvant therapy [odds ratio (OR) = 2.687, <i>p</i> = 0.014], higher body mass index, higher albumin levels, lower carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and reduced blood loss as independent predictors of TO. Combination neoadjuvant regimens (chemotherapy plus targeted/immunotherapy; OR = 2.647, <i>p</i> = 0.009) were the primary contributors to this positive association. A nomogram integrating TO, lymph node metastasis, prothrombin time, and adjuvant therapy demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy for survival (1-year area under the curve = 0.891).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving TO is associated with significantly improved survival in patients with ICC. Combined neoadjuvant therapy, including targeted or immunotherapy, is an independent positive predictor of TO, which challenges conventional perspectives. The proposed TO-integrated nomogram is a practical tool for prognostic prediction and surgical quality assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1737204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12873714/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1748746
Antonio Giordano, Luana Fianchi, Marianna Criscuolo, Martina Quattrone, Alessia Di Pilla, Livio Pagano
Background: Mycosis Fungoides (MF) is a common subtype of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), a group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The clinical spectrum of MF ranges from isolated cutaneous lesions to widespread involvement of lymph nodes, blood, and skin, as seen in its aggressive variant, Sézary Syndrome (SS). Mogamulizumab, a defucosylated humanized IgG1-κ anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody approved for relapsed/refractory MF/SS, has demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile in multiple case series.
Methods: This retrospective, monocentric observational study analyzed data from 12 patients treated with Mogamulizumab between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2024. We aim to evaluate the tolerability and clinical response to Mogamulizumab in patients with MF/SS.
Results: Of the 12 patients treated, 8 had MF and 4 had SS. The median follow-up time was 29.9 months (range 2.8-68.6 months). Four patients discontinued mogamulizumab: 3 due to disease progression and 1 due to the development of breast cancer. Adverse events included MAR in 4 patients (33%) and colitis in 1 patient (6%). The observed median PFS after mogamulizumab therapy was 5.4 months, and the observed ORR was 50%. For all 12 patients, the median time to response (TTR) was 129 days. The observed median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months, with 1 reported death due to septic shock in a patient who underwent salvage allo-HSCT after mogamulizumab failure.
Conclusions: The results of this study reaffirm the efficacy of Mogamulizumab therapy for patients with Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome in a real-world setting, which involves treatment decisions that must often consider patient heterogeneity, comorbidities, and prior lines of therapy.
{"title":"Efficacy and tolerability of mogamulizumab in mycosis fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: a monocentric retrospective study.","authors":"Antonio Giordano, Luana Fianchi, Marianna Criscuolo, Martina Quattrone, Alessia Di Pilla, Livio Pagano","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1748746","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1748746","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mycosis Fungoides (MF) is a common subtype of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), a group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The clinical spectrum of MF ranges from isolated cutaneous lesions to widespread involvement of lymph nodes, blood, and skin, as seen in its aggressive variant, Sézary Syndrome (SS). Mogamulizumab, a defucosylated humanized IgG1-κ anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody approved for relapsed/refractory MF/SS, has demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile in multiple case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, monocentric observational study analyzed data from 12 patients treated with Mogamulizumab between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2024. We aim to evaluate the tolerability and clinical response to Mogamulizumab in patients with MF/SS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 12 patients treated, 8 had MF and 4 had SS. The median follow-up time was 29.9 months (range 2.8-68.6 months). Four patients discontinued mogamulizumab: 3 due to disease progression and 1 due to the development of breast cancer. Adverse events included MAR in 4 patients (33%) and colitis in 1 patient (6%). The observed median PFS after mogamulizumab therapy was 5.4 months, and the observed ORR was 50%. For all 12 patients, the median time to response (TTR) was 129 days. The observed median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months, with 1 reported death due to septic shock in a patient who underwent salvage allo-HSCT after mogamulizumab failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study reaffirm the efficacy of Mogamulizumab therapy for patients with Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome in a real-world setting, which involves treatment decisions that must often consider patient heterogeneity, comorbidities, and prior lines of therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1748746"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12872498/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1771057
Caroline Anthon, Hugo Pierret, Frederic Houssiau, Selda Aydin, Astrid De Cuyper, Cédric Van Marcke, Marc Van Den Eynde, Filomena Mazzeo, Frank Cornelis, Rachel Galot, Francois P Duhoux, Jean-François Baurain, Emmanuel Seront
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1658621.].
[这更正了文章DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1658621.]。
{"title":"Correction: A case report of malignant hypertension and multiorgan dysfunction during immunotherapy for gallbladder cancer.","authors":"Caroline Anthon, Hugo Pierret, Frederic Houssiau, Selda Aydin, Astrid De Cuyper, Cédric Van Marcke, Marc Van Den Eynde, Filomena Mazzeo, Frank Cornelis, Rachel Galot, Francois P Duhoux, Jean-François Baurain, Emmanuel Seront","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1771057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1771057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1658621.].</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1771057"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12874704/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Although the fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio (FLR) is an established prognostic biomarker in various solid tumors, its role in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains poorly defined. This study aimed not only to investigate the predictive value of preoperative FLR for overall survival (OS) in NMIBC patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBt), but also to develop and validate a novel FLR-based nomogram as a practical clinical tool.
Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 304 NMIBC patients who underwent TURBt at the Shijiazhuang People's Hospital between November 2013 and January 2024, with OS as the primary endpoint. The optimal prognostic cutoff for FLR was determined by maximizing the Youden index via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Propensity score matching (1:2) was employed to balance baseline confounders. The dose-response relationship between continuous FLR and mortality risk was evaluated using restricted cubic splines (RCS), which confirmed a linear association. Subsequently, independent prognostic factors identified through Cox proportional hazards regression were integrated to construct a nomogram. The model's predictive accuracy and clinical utility were then comprehensively evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, time-dependent ROC curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results: The optimal FLR cutoff was identified as 2.91. Patients in the high-FLR group (FLR ≥ 2.91) exhibited significantly poorer OS (P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = 0.004). RCS analysis confirmed a significant positive linear association between increasing FLR levels and all-cause mortality risk. Critically, multivariate Cox regression validated FLR as an independent predictor for both OS (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.520, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.149-2.010) and CSS (HR: 1.536, 95% CI: 1.033-2.284). Integrating FLR into a baseline model improved the C-index for OS prediction from 0.739 to 0.772. The resulting nomogram demonstrated robust discrimination (C-index: 0.772), excellent calibration, and superior net clinical benefit in DCA.
Conclusion: Preoperative FLR is an independent predictor of overall survival in NMIBC, characterized by a robust linear dose-response relationship with mortality risk. This cost-effective biomarker, integrated into our validated nomogram, enhances risk stratification to guide personalized postoperative management.
{"title":"Preoperative fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Xueqiao Zhang, Shiqiang Su, Lizhe Liu, Feifan Song, Xiongjie Cui, Yunpeng Cao, Chao Li, Shen Li, Hanxing He, Yuanhui Kang, Jin Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1707696","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1707696","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although the fibrinogen-to-lymphocyte ratio (FLR) is an established prognostic biomarker in various solid tumors, its role in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains poorly defined. This study aimed not only to investigate the predictive value of preoperative FLR for overall survival (OS) in NMIBC patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBt), but also to develop and validate a novel FLR-based nomogram as a practical clinical tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 304 NMIBC patients who underwent TURBt at the Shijiazhuang People's Hospital between November 2013 and January 2024, with OS as the primary endpoint. The optimal prognostic cutoff for FLR was determined by maximizing the Youden index via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Propensity score matching (1:2) was employed to balance baseline confounders. The dose-response relationship between continuous FLR and mortality risk was evaluated using restricted cubic splines (RCS), which confirmed a linear association. Subsequently, independent prognostic factors identified through Cox proportional hazards regression were integrated to construct a nomogram. The model's predictive accuracy and clinical utility were then comprehensively evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, time-dependent ROC curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal FLR cutoff was identified as 2.91. Patients in the high-FLR group (FLR ≥ 2.91) exhibited significantly poorer OS (P < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = 0.004). RCS analysis confirmed a significant positive linear association between increasing FLR levels and all-cause mortality risk. Critically, multivariate Cox regression validated FLR as an independent predictor for both OS (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.520, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.149-2.010) and CSS (HR: 1.536, 95% CI: 1.033-2.284). Integrating FLR into a baseline model improved the C-index for OS prediction from 0.739 to 0.772. The resulting nomogram demonstrated robust discrimination (C-index: 0.772), excellent calibration, and superior net clinical benefit in DCA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative FLR is an independent predictor of overall survival in NMIBC, characterized by a robust linear dose-response relationship with mortality risk. This cost-effective biomarker, integrated into our validated nomogram, enhances risk stratification to guide personalized postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1707696"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12872508/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1706670
Ahmed Alshehri, Abdullah Khalaf Altwairgi, Abdulwahab AlTourah, Ahmed Alwbari, Aref Chehal, Francois Calaud, Hashem Al-Hashem, Husam Marashi, Sherif Elsamany, Syed Hammad Tirmazy
Optimizing second-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is challenged by variations in diagnostic capacity, drug accessibility, comorbidities, and treatment pathways compared with other regions. While international guidelines provide an overarching evidence framework for breast cancer management, their practical application at the regional level often requires adaptation to local healthcare resources. There is an unmet need to optimize the treatment sequencing strategies for patients with HR+/HER2-negative mBC in the GCC region through expert guidance. Given this context, a virtual advisory board involving 10 oncologists from the GCC region was convened in November 2024. The panel aimed to review current evidence and develop pragmatic, implementable recommendations for second-line management. This consensus uniquely contextualizes global evidence for GCC-specific healthcare constraints, addressing gaps in diagnostic access, affordability, and real-world feasibility, while providing treatment recommendations that help clinicians refine therapeutic strategies and incorporate patient preferences for improved outcomes. The panel recommends early genomic testing (PIK3CA, AKT, BRCA, ESR1) to guide therapy, prioritizing targeted agents such as oral SERDs and PI3K/AKT inhibitors in second-line sequencing, cautious use of alpelisib in diabetic patients, and incorporating patient preferences through shared decision-making and multidisciplinary care.
{"title":"Optimizing second-line endocrine-based treatment in HR positive HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: a comprehensive expert statement from the Gulf Cooperation Council Region.","authors":"Ahmed Alshehri, Abdullah Khalaf Altwairgi, Abdulwahab AlTourah, Ahmed Alwbari, Aref Chehal, Francois Calaud, Hashem Al-Hashem, Husam Marashi, Sherif Elsamany, Syed Hammad Tirmazy","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1706670","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1706670","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimizing second-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is challenged by variations in diagnostic capacity, drug accessibility, comorbidities, and treatment pathways compared with other regions. While international guidelines provide an overarching evidence framework for breast cancer management, their practical application at the regional level often requires adaptation to local healthcare resources. There is an unmet need to optimize the treatment sequencing strategies for patients with HR+/HER2-negative mBC in the GCC region through expert guidance. Given this context, a virtual advisory board involving 10 oncologists from the GCC region was convened in November 2024. The panel aimed to review current evidence and develop pragmatic, implementable recommendations for second-line management. This consensus uniquely contextualizes global evidence for GCC-specific healthcare constraints, addressing gaps in diagnostic access, affordability, and real-world feasibility, while providing treatment recommendations that help clinicians refine therapeutic strategies and incorporate patient preferences for improved outcomes. The panel recommends early genomic testing (PIK3CA, AKT, BRCA, ESR1) to guide therapy, prioritizing targeted agents such as oral SERDs and PI3K/AKT inhibitors in second-line sequencing, cautious use of alpelisib in diabetic patients, and incorporating patient preferences through shared decision-making and multidisciplinary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1706670"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12872529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1718863
Eyad Himdiat, Jean-François Haince, Rashid A Bux, Guoyu Huang, Paramjit S Tappia, Bram Ramjiawan, Maria Vaida
Objectives: The detection of lung cancer at its early stages remains essential for better survival outcomes, but current diagnostic approaches show limited sensitivity and often suffer from poor generalizability and a lack of interpretability.
Methods: This retrospective study develops a machine-learning pipeline that integrates plasma metabolite measurements with pathways to derive a pathway-informed biomarker panel for lung cancer screening.
Results: Using 800 plasma samples from the Cooperative Human Tissue Network biobank (586 cancer, 214 controls) with 166 metabolites and 60 derived pathways, we identified a subset of 41 predictors (9 pathways, 26 metabolites, 6 demographic variables) through an ensemble selection framework. Several models were tested with the Support Vector Machines (SVM) model, achieving the best results. The model delivered an overall 97% accuracy with a ROC AUC of 0.97 on this subset. After eliminating pathway-related metabolites from the initial dataset, feature selection reduced the number of variables from 170 to 41, retaining biological relevance and minimizing overfitting. The glutaminolysis and tryptophan metabolism pathway analysis yielded the most enhanced biological indicators.
Conclusions: This noninvasive, interpretable approach using plasma panel could facilitate cost-effective, early-stage lung cancer screening for at high-risk population cohort, with strong translational potential in clinical settings. Future work should focus on multi-center validation, prospective validation, assessing potential longitudinal biomarker stability, and integration with other omics data to further advance precision oncology, ultimately improving early detection and patient outcomes in lung cancer management.
{"title":"Translational impact of machine learning-driven predictive modeling with pathway-based plasma metabolomic biomarkers for lung cancer detection.","authors":"Eyad Himdiat, Jean-François Haince, Rashid A Bux, Guoyu Huang, Paramjit S Tappia, Bram Ramjiawan, Maria Vaida","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1718863","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1718863","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The detection of lung cancer at its early stages remains essential for better survival outcomes, but current diagnostic approaches show limited sensitivity and often suffer from poor generalizability and a lack of interpretability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study develops a machine-learning pipeline that integrates plasma metabolite measurements with pathways to derive a pathway-informed biomarker panel for lung cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using 800 plasma samples from the Cooperative Human Tissue Network biobank (586 cancer, 214 controls) with 166 metabolites and 60 derived pathways, we identified a subset of 41 predictors (9 pathways, 26 metabolites, 6 demographic variables) through an ensemble selection framework. Several models were tested with the Support Vector Machines (SVM) model, achieving the best results. The model delivered an overall 97% accuracy with a ROC AUC of 0.97 on this subset. After eliminating pathway-related metabolites from the initial dataset, feature selection reduced the number of variables from 170 to 41, retaining biological relevance and minimizing overfitting. The glutaminolysis and tryptophan metabolism pathway analysis yielded the most enhanced biological indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This noninvasive, interpretable approach using plasma panel could facilitate cost-effective, early-stage lung cancer screening for at high-risk population cohort, with strong translational potential in clinical settings. Future work should focus on multi-center validation, prospective validation, assessing potential longitudinal biomarker stability, and integration with other omics data to further advance precision oncology, ultimately improving early detection and patient outcomes in lung cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1718863"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12872517/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1717432
Mehek Sharma, Anvay Shah, Kimberly A Rivera-Caraballo, Girindra Raval, Balveen Kaur, Gerald C Wallace
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, due in large part to the development of NSCLC-associated brain metastases (L-BM). Upon initial presentation, 11-26% of patients with NSCLC will have L-BM, while half of patients with NSCLC will develop L-BM over the course of their disease. The emergence of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and targeted therapies for EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 mutations has transformed the treatment landscape and improved outcomes for select patient populations. CNS progression remains a major challenge due to therapy resistance, the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and the unique molecular and transcriptomic adaptations exhibited by NSCLC brain metastases which differs markedly from primary lung tumors. In this review, we examine the molecular drivers of CNS metastasis, oncogenic signaling-targeted therapies, and next-generation CNS drug-delivery strategies including intraventricular or intranasal administration, focused ultrasound, nanocarriers, and efflux transporter modulation. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive update on recent and ongoing preclinical and clinical studies, highlighting novel CNS-penetrant agents with demonstrated intracranial efficacy. Understanding these mechanisms and refining targeted approaches are critical to improving CNS disease control, survival outcomes, and quality of life for NSCLC patients with brain involvement.
{"title":"Brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: molecular subtypes and emerging CNS-directed precision therapies.","authors":"Mehek Sharma, Anvay Shah, Kimberly A Rivera-Caraballo, Girindra Raval, Balveen Kaur, Gerald C Wallace","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1717432","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1717432","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, due in large part to the development of NSCLC-associated brain metastases (L-BM). Upon initial presentation, 11-26% of patients with NSCLC will have L-BM, while half of patients with NSCLC will develop L-BM over the course of their disease. The emergence of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and targeted therapies for <i>EGFR</i>, <i>ALK</i>, and <i>ROS1</i> mutations has transformed the treatment landscape and improved outcomes for select patient populations. CNS progression remains a major challenge due to therapy resistance, the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and the unique molecular and transcriptomic adaptations exhibited by NSCLC brain metastases which differs markedly from primary lung tumors. In this review, we examine the molecular drivers of CNS metastasis, oncogenic signaling-targeted therapies, and next-generation CNS drug-delivery strategies including intraventricular or intranasal administration, focused ultrasound, nanocarriers, and efflux transporter modulation. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive update on recent and ongoing preclinical and clinical studies, highlighting novel CNS-penetrant agents with demonstrated intracranial efficacy. Understanding these mechanisms and refining targeted approaches are critical to improving CNS disease control, survival outcomes, and quality of life for NSCLC patients with brain involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1717432"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12872532/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Head-to-head comparative evidence of the relative efficacies of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) and tremelimumab plus durvalumab (Treme+Dur) as first-line therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains limited. Thus, in the present study, we compared the real-world efficacy and safety of these two modalities using a target trial emulation approach.
Methods: Using the TriNetX Research Network, we identified adults (≥20 years) with HCC (ICD-10 C22.0) who initiated first-line Atezo+Bev or Treme+Dur (November 2022- November 2024). Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included 1- or 2-year OS and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) within 12 months, based on pre-specified ICD-10 definitions.
Results: After matching, 640 patients were included in each group. Residual imbalance persisted in hepatic reserve markers (albumin, international normalized ratio, and platelet count; standardized mean differences >0.1). One-year OS was numerically higher in the Atezo+Bev group than in the Treme+Dur group (61% vs 55%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.806; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.665-0.976; p = 0.027). Two-year OS (HR, 0.864; 95% CI, 0.723-1.031; p = 0.105) and overall OS showed no significant differences (median: 19.4 vs 19.0 months [591 vs 578 days]; HR, 0.886; 95% CI, 0.743-1.057; p = 0.179). Most irAEs were similar; however, the time-to-first hepatic irAEs favored Atezo+Bev (HR, 0.678; 95% CI, 0.487-0.943; p = 0.020). Notably, respiratory irAEs occurred significantly earlier in the Treme+Dur group than in the Atezo+Bev group (mean onset: 2.4 vs 3.2 days; p = 0.031).
Conclusions: In this real-world target trial emulation, Atezo+Bev and Treme+Dur demonstrated broadly comparable long-term OS rates when used as first-line therapies for HCC. While baseline hepatic reserve plays an important role, the treatment regimen itself may contribute to earlier onset of hepatic and respiratory irAE. Careful monitoring for early-onset hepatic dysfunction and respiratory irAEs may be warranted in patients treated with Treme+Dur combination therapy.
导语:atezolizumab + bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev)和tremelimumab + durvalumab (Treme+Dur)作为晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)一线治疗的相对疗效的头对头比较证据仍然有限。因此,在本研究中,我们使用目标试验模拟方法比较了这两种模式的实际疗效和安全性。方法:使用TriNetX研究网络,我们确定了患有HCC (ICD-10 C22.0)的成人(≥20岁),他们在2022年11月至2024年11月期间接受了一线Atezo+Bev或Treme+Dur治疗。倾向评分匹配(1:1)用于平衡基线特征。主要结局指标为总生存期(OS)。根据预先指定的ICD-10定义,次要结局包括1年或2年的生存期和12个月内器官特异性免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。结果:经配对后,每组纳入640例患者。肝储备标志物(白蛋白、国际标准化比值和血小板计数;标准化平均差异bb0.1)仍然存在残余失衡。Atezo+Bev组的1年OS数值高于Treme+Dur组(61% vs 55%;风险比[HR], 0.806; 95%可信区间[CI], 0.665-0.976; p = 0.027)。2年OS (HR, 0.864; 95% CI, 0.723-1.031; p = 0.105)和总OS无显著差异(中位数:19.4 vs 19.0个月[591 vs 578天];HR, 0.886; 95% CI, 0.743-1.057; p = 0.179)。大多数irae是相似的;然而,到第一次肝脏irae的时间倾向于Atezo+Bev (HR, 0.678; 95% CI, 0.487-0.943; p = 0.020)。值得注意的是,Treme+Dur组发生呼吸系统irae的时间明显早于Atezo+Bev组(平均发病时间:2.4天vs 3.2天;p = 0.031)。结论:在这个现实世界的目标试验模拟中,Atezo+Bev和Treme+Dur作为HCC的一线治疗时,显示出大致相当的长期OS率。虽然基线肝储备起着重要作用,但治疗方案本身可能导致肝脏和呼吸道irAE的早期发病。在接受Treme+Dur联合治疗的患者中,可能需要仔细监测早发性肝功能障碍和呼吸道irae。
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of two first-line, ICI-based regimens for advanced HCC: a target trial emulation using an electronic medical record network.","authors":"Chihiro Shiraishi, Miho Shigyou, Ryuichi Inoue, Toru Ogura, Susumu Kaneshige, Toshinobu Hayashi","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1776032","DOIUrl":"10.3389/fonc.2026.1776032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Head-to-head comparative evidence of the relative efficacies of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) and tremelimumab plus durvalumab (Treme+Dur) as first-line therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains limited. Thus, in the present study, we compared the real-world efficacy and safety of these two modalities using a target trial emulation approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the TriNetX Research Network, we identified adults (≥20 years) with HCC (ICD-10 C22.0) who initiated first-line Atezo+Bev or Treme+Dur (November 2022- November 2024). Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included 1- or 2-year OS and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) within 12 months, based on pre-specified ICD-10 definitions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 640 patients were included in each group. Residual imbalance persisted in hepatic reserve markers (albumin, international normalized ratio, and platelet count; standardized mean differences >0.1). One-year OS was numerically higher in the Atezo+Bev group than in the Treme+Dur group (61% <i>vs</i> 55%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.806; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.665-0.976; <i>p</i> = 0.027). Two-year OS (HR, 0.864; 95% CI, 0.723-1.031; <i>p</i> = 0.105) and overall OS showed no significant differences (median: 19.4 <i>vs</i> 19.0 months [591 <i>vs</i> 578 days]; HR, 0.886; 95% CI, 0.743-1.057; <i>p</i> = 0.179). Most irAEs were similar; however, the time-to-first hepatic irAEs favored Atezo+Bev (HR, 0.678; 95% CI, 0.487-0.943; <i>p</i> = 0.020). Notably, respiratory irAEs occurred significantly earlier in the Treme+Dur group than in the Atezo+Bev group (mean onset: 2.4 <i>vs</i> 3.2 days; <i>p</i> = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world target trial emulation, Atezo+Bev and Treme+Dur demonstrated broadly comparable long-term OS rates when used as first-line therapies for HCC. While baseline hepatic reserve plays an important role, the treatment regimen itself may contribute to earlier onset of hepatic and respiratory irAE. Careful monitoring for early-onset hepatic dysfunction and respiratory irAEs may be warranted in patients treated with Treme+Dur combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1776032"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12872483/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}