Giornale italiano di cardiologia最新文献

Left ventricular free wall rupture, ventricular pseudoaneurysm, papillary muscle rupture and ventricular septal rupture are life-threatening mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction. Despite significant improvements over the last decades in overall mortality for patients with myocardial infarction, the outcome of subjects who develop post-infarction mechanical complications remains poor. Surgical treatment is considered the standard of care. However, percutaneous approaches (such as pericardial fibrin-glue injection for left ventricular free wall rupture, transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral repair for papillary muscle rupture and device closure for ventricular pseudoaneurysm or septal rupture) have been proposed in selected high-risk or inoperable patients, or in subjects with ideal characteristics for feasibility, as therapeutic alternatives to open surgery. The aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the percutaneous strategies for the management of post-acute myocardial infarction mechanical complications.

Background: The Cardiology Complex Structure of the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) of Lodi, Italy, assists patients with clinical conditions ranging from emergency to chronicity. The model of Homogeneous Waiting Groups should guide the appropriateness of prescriptions categorized as U (urgent), B (brief), D (deferrable), and P (programmable). This study aims to describe and analyze the characteristics of prescription and delivery of clinical and instrumental cardiology outpatient services with U and B priority during the November 2023-January 2024 quarter, paying particular attention to the clinical appropriateness of prescribing.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted. Computerized data were anonymously extracted from the company's Management Control and provided with the authorization of the Data Protection Officer.

Results: During the observed quarter, the Cardiology Complex Structure provided 7379 services for outpatients. Out of 123 U services, 94 (76.4%) were managed through SBC (Single Booking Center) and 29 (23.6%) were managed outside the SBC. From 529 services with B priority, 504 (95%) were managed through SBC and 25 (5%) outside the SBC. Requests with U priority mainly referred to ECG (n = 50; 40.6%) and first cardiological visit (n = 46; 37.4%). Fifty percent of U and B requests were prescribed by 4% and 8% of general practitioners, respectively. The prescribed priority was correct for 13% of requests (n = 64).

Conclusions: This study shows a vastly inappropriate use of resources allocated to urgent outpatient cardiological services. Actions aimed at promoting the adherence to the Homogeneous Waiting Groups Manual and enhancing telemedicine services, currently limited to heart failure, are necessary for resource optimization in cardiology within the ASST of Lodi.

In patients with cardiovascular, pulmonary, muscular and neurological diseases, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a valuable tool providing clinically-relevant diagnostic and prognostic information by evaluation of exercise response. CPET requires to be performed in dedicated centers able to correctly carry out the examination and to carefully evaluate the results. CPET analyzes functional capacity revealing both symptomatic and asymptomatic intolerance to exercise. One of the most important advantages for clinicians derived by the use of CPET, beyond standard exercise electrocardiography testing, is the capability not only to grade the severity of the disease, but also to distinguish between different causes of dyspnea and exercise impairment. Indications for CPET use in clinical practice are increasing in the last decades, evolving beyond the routine use as a training tool in athletes. In fact, CPET represents an important step in the management of patients with heart failure or pulmonary hypertension, as suggested by international guidelines. CPET role in helping for the selection of patients candidate to heart transplantation is also well known. Beyond its clinical usefulness, scientific interest in CPET is constantly expanding, mainly due to the safety of the exam and to the huge size of the pathophysiological information that it offers. The aim of this paper is to simply explain everyday applications and potential further purposes of CPET in clinical practice. Our review is intended both for physicians approaching CPET for the first time and for clinicians with an interest in expanding their knowledge in this field.

The Italian law 217/2019 on "Informed consent and advance directives" is an important step forward in the redefinition of patient-doctor relationships. The law points out the principles of the decisional autonomy and freedom of the patient to choose the treatment options. However, it is underestimated and largely unapplied by the Italian cardiologists. The main elements of patient-doctor communication are present in the law. The most important is the time devoted to the patient-doctor relationship, necessary to ease the disease awareness. This time is clearly emphasized in the law, but the healthcare institutions did not arrange for the appropriate organizational procedures. Through the advance directives (ADs) the patients may express their own wishes about healthcare treatments, as well as their consent or refusal regarding the diagnostic or therapeutical doctors' suggestions, allowing their respect in case they become incompetent. This right is supported by the patients' designation of a healthcare proxy, who can interact for them with the healthcare team. However, after 6 years since the law enactment, only 0.4% of the Italian citizens signed ADs, due to insufficient information and organization by the healthcare authorities. In the Law, the advance care planning is closely related to ADs. In this process, the adults can understand and share their personal values, life goals and preferences, in order to define the potential future medical care and to discuss all the issues with family and physicians. These processes can be integrated in a broader shared decision-making, a strong tool of the patient-doctor alliance.

Over the last few decades, endovascular revascularization techniques have revolutionized the treatment of peripheral artery disease, offering a less invasive alternative to surgery. However, the successful treatment of heavily calcified lesions is often compromised by various vascular complications, including recoils, dissections, and the need for target vessel reinterventions. This has prompted the development of several tools for lesion preparation, with the aim of achieving better procedural outcomes. This review aims to summarize the main characteristics and current evidence related to the available devices for preparing severely calcified peripheral lesions.

Perioperative stroke and neurological injuries in general are complications that can occur during and after cardiac surgery, particularly in aortic surgery that involves the aortic arch. The overall incidence of early and delayed stroke is about 1% according to recent meta-analyses. This incidence depends on interindividual risk factor profile and type of surgery. In order to reduce cerebrovascular complications during cardiac surgery, a number of preventative measures can be taken, including the evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques, the site of cannulation and neuroprotection strategies. During aortic arch surgery, main strategies for cerebral protection are represented by deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, retrograde and antegrade cerebral perfusion.

Mortality for cardiogenic shock is still high despite optimal pharmacological therapy. Therefore, active mechanical circulatory support devices are increasingly used; venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) enables full circulatory and respiratory support. However, recent data show that in patients with infarct-related shock unselected early use of VA-ECMO does not improve survival and is associated with major bleeding and peripheral ischemic complications. Nowadays, waiting for the results of definitive randomized controlled trials, the main indication for ECMO utilization is in selected patients with cardiac arrest, in those with shock for advanced heart failure refractory to conventional therapy, in those with fulminant myocarditis, in patients candidate for heart transplant or ventricular assistance, especially in presence of respiratory insufficiency and severe biventricular dysfunction. An important recommendation is its utilization in specialized, high-volume centers in the setting of hub and spoke hospitals.