Giornale italiano di cardiologia最新文献

Among cardiac tumors, angiosarcoma is the most common primary malignancy, with a relatively higher prevalence in young male adults and a weak dominance in the right atrium as a primary site of growth. It is characterized by rapid infiltration of cardiac structures and possible metastasis to mediastinal and distant organs. The patient may be asymptomatic until advanced phases. It therefore has a poor prognosis. Diagnosis requires the use of multimodality imaging, including echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. The definitive diagnosis is based on histological examination. We report the case of a young male adult who was referred to the cardiology department for a syncopal event 5 h after cocaine assumption. During the diagnostic work-up, a chest X-ray was performed, showing multiple pulmonary lesions, which were evaluated with a chest CT highlighting the presence of a cardiac mass in the right atrium and ventricle. For this reason, a complete cardiological evaluation was performed. The clinical and instrumental suspicion of a malignant cardiac tumor was confirmed by multimodality imaging and finally by histological examination.

Dyslipidemia is one of the most important risk factors for the development of atherosclerotic disease and its control, through well-proven therapies, allows an optimal risk management over time. LDL-cholesterol targets are well defined by international guidelines and based on individual cardiovascular risk. As guidelines evolve, also laboratory reports need to do the same, including lipid reference values by cardiovascular risk classes, to avoid misunderstandings and inappropriate lipid-lowering therapy withdrawal. The aim of the present joint document from the Italian Society of Cardiology (SIC) and the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology - Lab Medicine (SIBioC) is to analyze the importance of cardiovascular risk estimation, therapeutical targets, and crucial elements about dyslipidemia in laboratory tests, as well as to suggest a shared proposal for the report of lipid profile parameters to be applied to all clinical scenarios of our daily practice.

Due to the growing evidence of clinical benefits conferred by the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, the availability of multiple effective lipid-lowering agents, and guideline recommendations, clinicians not infrequently have to manage patients with low or very low LDL-C levels. In clinical practice it is essential to consider that, when LDL-C plasma concentrations are low, the Friedewald formula commonly used for LDL-C level calculation is less accurate, hence risk assessment should be integrated by using different methods for LDL-C level quantification and other parameters, such as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and, where possible, apolipoprotein B, should be measured. As regards the clinical impact of low LDL-C levels, genetically determined hypocholesterolemia forms provide reassuring data on the effects of this condition in the long term, except for the forms with extremely low or undetectable LDL-C levels. Evidence from clinical studies that used highly effective lipid-lowering drugs, such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, goes in the same direction. In these studies, the incidence of non-cardiovascular adverse events in patients who reached very low LDL-C levels was similar to that in the placebo arm. Overall, the fear of adverse effects should not deter intensive lipid-lowering treatment when indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.

More than 50 years after its introduction in clinical practice, the increase in the intensity of care offered by the cardiac intensive care units, the shift in the population of patients treated and the wider availability of circulatory supports, still makes the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) an essential tool for diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock. In this review, we will discuss how to identify those patients who can benefit most from its use, the configuration and the correct insertion technique of a PAC. A pragmatic guide will also be provided for the interpretation of the hemodynamic indexes (direct and calculated) that the PAC is able to reveal as well as a summary of the most common errors in reading or interpreting the pressure curves provided by the PAC. In this article, we will then present a practical guide on how to use the PAC in a modern cardiac intensive care unit.

Hypertension does not recognize obvious pathogenic causes in the majority of patients (essential hypertension). However, a secondary underlying cause of hypertension can be recognized in 5-10% of unselected hypertensive patients, and this prevalence may increase to more than 20% in patients with hypertension that is difficult to control or frankly resistant to treatment. In children, secondary hypertension is most often due to aortic coarctation, distal thoracic or abdominal aortic stenosis, or specific gene mutations. In adults or elderly individuals, secondary hypertension is most often due to atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, primary hyperaldosteronism, and Cushing's disease or syndrome. Parenchymal nephropathy and hyperparathyroidism can cause hypertension at all ages, while pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma tend to occur more often in adolescents or young adults. In general, secondary hypertension should be suspected in subjects with: (a) onset of hypertension under 30 years of age especially if in the absence of hypertensive family history or other risk factors for hypertension; (b) treatment-resistant hypertension; c) severe hypertension (>180/110 mmHg), malignancy, or hypertensive emergencies; d) rapid rise in blood pressure values in previously well controlled patients. Any clinical signs suspicious or suggestive of hypertension from endocrine causes, a "reverse dipping" or "non-dipping'" profile at 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring not justified by other factors, signs of obvious organ damage may be helpful clues for diagnosis. Finally, patients snoring or with clear sleep apnea should also be considered for possible secondary hypertension.