首页 > 最新文献

General Session Abstracts最新文献

英文 中文
Abstract GS4-07: Race, ethnicity and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from the TAILORx trial GS4-07:种族、民族和激素受体阳性、her2阴性、淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的临床结局:来自TAILORx试验的结果
Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS4-07
K. Albain, R. Gray, J. Sparano, D. Makower, K. Pritchard, D. Hayes, C. Geyer, E. Dees, Mp Goetz, J. Olson, T. Lively, S. Badve, T. Saphner, Lindsay Wagner, T. Whelan, M. Ellis, S. Paik, W. Wood, P. Ravdin, M. Keane, H. Gómez, P. Reddy, T. Goggins, I. Mayer, A. Brufsky, D. Toppmeyer, V. Kaklamani, J. Berenberg, J. Abrams, G. Sledge
Background: Black race is associated with worse outcomes in localized hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer in population-based and in clinical trial cohorts, whether using self-identified race (Albain et al. JNCI 2009 [PMID: 19584328; Sparano et al. JNCI 2012 [PMID: 22250182) or genetically-identified race (Schneider et al. J Precision Oncol 2017 [PMID: 29333527]). This disparity persists after adjustment for treatment delivery parameters (Hershman et al. JCO 2009 [PMID:19307504]). We evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment delivered and clinical outcomes in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) by race and ethnicity (Sparano et al. NEJM 2018 [PMID: 29860917]). Methods: The analysis included 9719 evaluable TAILORx participants. The association between clinical outcomes and race (white, black, Asian, other/unknown) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic) was examined, including invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free interval (DRFI), relapse-free interval (RFI), and overall survival (OS). Proportional hazards models were fit including age (5 categories), tumor size (>2 cm vs. Results: The study population included 8189 (84%) whites, 693 (7%) blacks, 405 (4%) Asians, and 432 (4%) with other/unknown race. Regarding ethnicity, 7635 (79%) were non-Hispanic, 889 (9%) Hispanic, and 1195 (12%) unknown. There was no significant difference in RS distribution (p=0.22) in blacks compared with whites, or in median (17 vs. 17) or mean RS (19.1 vs. 18.2). There was likewise no difference in Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic ethnicity for RS distribution (p=0.72) or median (17 vs. 17) or mean RS (18.5 vs. 18.0). Black race (39% vs. 30%) and Hispanic ethnicity (39% vs. 30%) were both associated with younger age ( Conclusions: In patients eligible and selected for participation in TAILORx, black women had worse clinical outcomes despite similar 21-gene assay RS results and comparable systemic therapy. This adds to an emerging body of evidence suggesting a biologic basis or other factors contributing to racial disparities in HR-positive breast cancer that requires further evaluation. Citation Format: Albain K, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Hayes DF, Geyer, Jr. CE, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson, Jr. JA, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge, Jr. GW. Race, ethnicity and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from the TAILORx trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-07.
背景:在以人群为基础和临床试验队列中,黑人与局部激素受体(HR)阳性乳腺癌的预后较差相关,无论使用的是自我认定的种族(Albain等)。[qh] 2009 [mid: 19584328;Sparano等人。JNCI 2012 [PMID: 22250182]或基因鉴定的种族(Schneider等)。[J] .中国精密工程学报,2017。在调整治疗输送参数后,这种差异仍然存在(Hershman等)。Jco 2009 [mid:19307504])。我们在按种族和民族分配个体化治疗方案(TAILORx)的试验中评估了临床病理特征、提供的治疗和临床结果(Sparano等)。Nejm 2018[中值:29860917])。方法:纳入9719名可评价的TAILORx受试者。研究了临床结果与种族(白人、黑人、亚洲人、其他/未知种族)和种族(西班牙裔与非西班牙裔)之间的关系,包括侵袭性无病生存期(iDFS)、远端无复发间期(DRFI)、无复发间期(RFI)和总生存期(OS)。拟合的比例风险模型包括年龄(5类)、肿瘤大小(>2 cm)与结果:研究人群包括8189名(84%)白人、693名(7%)黑人、405名(4%)亚洲人和432名(4%)其他/未知种族。关于种族,7635人(79%)为非西班牙裔,889人(9%)为西班牙裔,1195人(12%)未知。黑人和白人的RS分布无显著差异(p=0.22),中位RS(17比17)和平均RS(19.1比18.2)也无显著差异。同样,西班牙裔与非西班牙裔的RS分布(p=0.72)、中位RS (17 vs. 17)或平均RS (18.5 vs. 18.0)也没有差异。黑人种族(39%对30%)和西班牙裔种族(39%对30%)都与较年轻的年龄相关(结论:在符合条件并选择参加TAILORx的患者中,黑人女性的临床结果较差,尽管有类似的21基因测定RS结果和类似的全身治疗。这增加了一个新出现的证据体,表明生物学基础或其他因素导致hr阳性乳腺癌的种族差异,需要进一步评估。引用格式:Albain K, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Hayes DF, Geyer, Jr CE, des EC, Goetz MP, Olson, Jr. JA, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge, Jr GW。种族、民族和激素受体阳性、her2阴性、淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的临床结局:来自TAILORx试验的结果[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS4-07。
{"title":"Abstract GS4-07: Race, ethnicity and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from the TAILORx trial","authors":"K. Albain, R. Gray, J. Sparano, D. Makower, K. Pritchard, D. Hayes, C. Geyer, E. Dees, Mp Goetz, J. Olson, T. Lively, S. Badve, T. Saphner, Lindsay Wagner, T. Whelan, M. Ellis, S. Paik, W. Wood, P. Ravdin, M. Keane, H. Gómez, P. Reddy, T. Goggins, I. Mayer, A. Brufsky, D. Toppmeyer, V. Kaklamani, J. Berenberg, J. Abrams, G. Sledge","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS4-07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS4-07","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Black race is associated with worse outcomes in localized hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer in population-based and in clinical trial cohorts, whether using self-identified race (Albain et al. JNCI 2009 [PMID: 19584328; Sparano et al. JNCI 2012 [PMID: 22250182) or genetically-identified race (Schneider et al. J Precision Oncol 2017 [PMID: 29333527]). This disparity persists after adjustment for treatment delivery parameters (Hershman et al. JCO 2009 [PMID:19307504]). We evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment delivered and clinical outcomes in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) by race and ethnicity (Sparano et al. NEJM 2018 [PMID: 29860917]). Methods: The analysis included 9719 evaluable TAILORx participants. The association between clinical outcomes and race (white, black, Asian, other/unknown) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic) was examined, including invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free interval (DRFI), relapse-free interval (RFI), and overall survival (OS). Proportional hazards models were fit including age (5 categories), tumor size (>2 cm vs. Results: The study population included 8189 (84%) whites, 693 (7%) blacks, 405 (4%) Asians, and 432 (4%) with other/unknown race. Regarding ethnicity, 7635 (79%) were non-Hispanic, 889 (9%) Hispanic, and 1195 (12%) unknown. There was no significant difference in RS distribution (p=0.22) in blacks compared with whites, or in median (17 vs. 17) or mean RS (19.1 vs. 18.2). There was likewise no difference in Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic ethnicity for RS distribution (p=0.72) or median (17 vs. 17) or mean RS (18.5 vs. 18.0). Black race (39% vs. 30%) and Hispanic ethnicity (39% vs. 30%) were both associated with younger age ( Conclusions: In patients eligible and selected for participation in TAILORx, black women had worse clinical outcomes despite similar 21-gene assay RS results and comparable systemic therapy. This adds to an emerging body of evidence suggesting a biologic basis or other factors contributing to racial disparities in HR-positive breast cancer that requires further evaluation. Citation Format: Albain K, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Hayes DF, Geyer, Jr. CE, Dees EC, Goetz MP, Olson, Jr. JA, Lively T, Badve SS, Saphner TJ, Wagner LI, Whelan TJ, Ellis MJ, Paik S, Wood WC, Ravdin PM, Keane MM, Gomez HL, Reddy PS, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Berenberg JL, Abrams J, Sledge, Jr. GW. Race, ethnicity and clinical outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from the TAILORx trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-07.","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75179446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract GS4-04: Primary results of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 (NRG Oncology): A randomized phase III study of conventional whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus partial breast irradiation (PBI) for women with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer GS4-04: NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 (NRG Oncology)的主要结果:一项随机III期研究,对0、I、II期乳腺癌女性进行常规全乳照射(WBI)与部分乳房照射(PBI)的比较
Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS4-04
F. Vicini, R. Cecchini, J. White, T. Julian, D. Arthur, R. Rabinovitch, R. Kuske, D. Parda, P. Ganz, M. Scheier, K. Winter, S. Paik, H. Kuerer, L. Vallow, L. Pierce, E. Mamounas, J. Costantino, H. Bear, I. Germaine, G. Gustafson, L. Grossheim, I. Petersen, R. Hudes, W. Curran, N. Wolmark
Background: Conventional WBI after lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer decreases ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), yielding comparable results to mastectomy. Accelerated PBI appears effective in reducing IBTR by treating only the tumor bed area. As the majority of IBTR occur at or in the vicinity of the tumor bed, we hypothesized that PBI would be as effective as WBI in controlling IBTR. The primary aim of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 was to determine if PBI provides equivalent local tumor control post lumpectomy compared to WBI in pts with early-stage breast cancer. The equivalency test was based on a 50% margin of increase in the hazard ratio (HR=1.5). Secondary endpoints included: overall survival (OS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), distant disease-free interval (DDFI), and toxicity. Methods: Eligible pts had lumpectomy with histologically-free margins and 0-3 positive axillary nodes. Pts were stratified by stage, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, and intent to receive chemotherapy and then randomized to PBI or WBI. PBI was 10 fractions of 3.4-3.85 Gy, given twice daily with either brachytherapy or 3D external beam radiation. WBI was 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions given daily with a sequential boost to the surgical cavity. Follow-up was every 6 mos for 5 yrs and then annually. All analyses were by intent-to-treat. Results: From 3-21-05 to 4-16-13, 4216 pts were randomized: 2107 PBI; 2109 WBI. 61% were postmenopausal; 81% were hormone receptor-positive; 29% intended to receive chemotherapy. Stage distribution was: DCIS, 24%; invasive pN0, 65%; invasive pN1, 10%. As of 7-31-18, median follow-up was 10.2 yrs. There were 161 IBTRs as first events: 90 PBI v 71 WBI (HR 1.22; 90%CI 0.94-1.58). Per protocol-defined margin, to declare PBI and WBI equivalent regarding IBTR risk, the 90% CI for the observed HR had to lie entirely between 0.667 and 1.5. The percent of pts IBTR-free at 10 yrs was 95.2% PBI v 95.9% WBI. A statistically significant difference in the 10-yr RFI rate favored WBI (91.9% PBI v 93.4% WBI; HR 1.32; 95%CI 1.04-1.68; p=0.02). No statistically significant differences existed between PBI and WBI in DDFI (HR 1.31; 95%CI 0.91-1.91; p=0.15), OS (HR 1.10; 95%CI 0.90-1.35; p=0.35), or DFS (HR 1.12; 95%CI 0.98-1.29; p=0.11). Grade 3 toxicity was 9.6% PBI v 7.1% WBI, and grade 4-5 toxicity was 0.5% v 0.3%, respectively. Discussion: PBI did not meet the criteria for equivalence to WBI in controlling IBTR based on the upper limit of the hazard ratio confidence interval. However, the absolute difference in 10-yr rate of IBTR was Support: U10CA180868, -180822, UG1CA189867. Citation Format: Vicini FA, Cecchini RS, White JR, Julian TB, Arthur DW, Rabinovitch RA, Kuske RR, Parda DS, Ganz PA, Scheier MF, Winter KA, Paik S, Kuerer HM, Vallow LA, Pierce LJ, Mamounas EP, Costantino JP, Bear HD, Germaine I, Gustafson G, Grossheim L, Petersen IA, Hudes RS, Curran, Jr. WJ, Wolmark N. Primary results of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 (NRG Oncology): A ran
背景:早期乳腺癌乳房肿瘤切除术后常规WBI可降低同侧乳房肿瘤复发率(IBTR),其结果与乳房切除术相当。加速PBI似乎通过仅治疗肿瘤床区来有效降低IBTR。由于大多数IBTR发生在肿瘤床或肿瘤床附近,我们假设PBI在控制IBTR方面与WBI一样有效。NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413的主要目的是确定在早期乳腺癌患者中,与WBI相比,PBI是否能在乳房肿瘤切除术后提供同等的局部肿瘤控制。等效性检验以风险比增加50%为基础(HR=1.5)。次要终点包括:总生存期(OS)、无复发间期(RFI)、远端无病间期(DDFI)和毒性。方法:符合条件的患者行无组织学边缘和0-3个阳性腋窝淋巴结的乳房肿瘤切除术。患者按分期、绝经状态、激素受体状态和接受化疗的意向分层,然后随机分为PBI组或WBI组。PBI为10次,3.4-3.85 Gy,每日两次,近距离治疗或3D外束放疗。WBI为50gy,每天给予2gy的剂量,连续增加到手术腔。每6个月随访一次,持续5年,然后每年随访一次。所有分析均按意向治疗进行。结果:从3-21-05到4-16-13,4216名患者被随机分配:2107名PBI;2109 WBI。61%为绝经后;激素受体阳性占81%;29%的人打算接受化疗。分期分布为:DCIS占24%;侵袭性pN0, 65%;侵袭性pN1, 10%。截至7-31-18,中位随访时间为10.2年。有161例ibtr作为首发事件:90例PBI vs 71例WBI (HR 1.22;90%可信区间0.94 - -1.58)。根据方案定义的边际,为了宣布PBI和WBI在IBTR风险方面相等,观察到的HR的90% CI必须完全介于0.667和1.5之间。10年无ibtr患者的百分比为95.2% PBI vs 95.9% WBI。10年RFI率对WBI有显著的统计学差异(91.9%的PBI vs 93.4%的WBI;人力资源1.32;95%可信区间1.04 - -1.68;p = 0.02)。PBI和WBI在DDFI中的差异无统计学意义(HR 1.31;95%可信区间0.91 - -1.91;p=0.15), OS (HR 1.10;95%可信区间0.90 - -1.35;p=0.35)或DFS (HR 1.12;95%可信区间0.98 - -1.29;p = 0.11)。3级毒性分别为9.6% PBI vs 7.1% WBI, 4-5级毒性分别为0.5% v 0.3%。讨论:基于风险比置信区间上限,PBI在控制IBTR方面不符合与WBI等效的标准。而10年期IBTR的绝对差值为:Support: U10CA180868, -180822, UG1CA189867。引用格式:Vicini FA, Cecchini RS, White JR, Julian TB, Arthur DW, Rabinovitch RA, Kuske RR, Parda DS, Ganz PA, Scheier MF, Winter KA, Paik S, Kuerer HM, Vallow LA, Pierce LJ, Mamounas EP, Costantino JP, Bear HD, Germaine I, Gustafson G, Grossheim L, Petersen IA, Hudes RS, Curran, JR . WJ, Wolmark N. NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 (NRG Oncology)的主要结果:传统全乳照射(WBI)与部分乳房照射(PBI)对0、I、II期乳腺癌患者的随机III期研究[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS4-04。
{"title":"Abstract GS4-04: Primary results of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 (NRG Oncology): A randomized phase III study of conventional whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus partial breast irradiation (PBI) for women with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer","authors":"F. Vicini, R. Cecchini, J. White, T. Julian, D. Arthur, R. Rabinovitch, R. Kuske, D. Parda, P. Ganz, M. Scheier, K. Winter, S. Paik, H. Kuerer, L. Vallow, L. Pierce, E. Mamounas, J. Costantino, H. Bear, I. Germaine, G. Gustafson, L. Grossheim, I. Petersen, R. Hudes, W. Curran, N. Wolmark","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS4-04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS4-04","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Conventional WBI after lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer decreases ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), yielding comparable results to mastectomy. Accelerated PBI appears effective in reducing IBTR by treating only the tumor bed area. As the majority of IBTR occur at or in the vicinity of the tumor bed, we hypothesized that PBI would be as effective as WBI in controlling IBTR. The primary aim of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 was to determine if PBI provides equivalent local tumor control post lumpectomy compared to WBI in pts with early-stage breast cancer. The equivalency test was based on a 50% margin of increase in the hazard ratio (HR=1.5). Secondary endpoints included: overall survival (OS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), distant disease-free interval (DDFI), and toxicity. Methods: Eligible pts had lumpectomy with histologically-free margins and 0-3 positive axillary nodes. Pts were stratified by stage, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, and intent to receive chemotherapy and then randomized to PBI or WBI. PBI was 10 fractions of 3.4-3.85 Gy, given twice daily with either brachytherapy or 3D external beam radiation. WBI was 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions given daily with a sequential boost to the surgical cavity. Follow-up was every 6 mos for 5 yrs and then annually. All analyses were by intent-to-treat. Results: From 3-21-05 to 4-16-13, 4216 pts were randomized: 2107 PBI; 2109 WBI. 61% were postmenopausal; 81% were hormone receptor-positive; 29% intended to receive chemotherapy. Stage distribution was: DCIS, 24%; invasive pN0, 65%; invasive pN1, 10%. As of 7-31-18, median follow-up was 10.2 yrs. There were 161 IBTRs as first events: 90 PBI v 71 WBI (HR 1.22; 90%CI 0.94-1.58). Per protocol-defined margin, to declare PBI and WBI equivalent regarding IBTR risk, the 90% CI for the observed HR had to lie entirely between 0.667 and 1.5. The percent of pts IBTR-free at 10 yrs was 95.2% PBI v 95.9% WBI. A statistically significant difference in the 10-yr RFI rate favored WBI (91.9% PBI v 93.4% WBI; HR 1.32; 95%CI 1.04-1.68; p=0.02). No statistically significant differences existed between PBI and WBI in DDFI (HR 1.31; 95%CI 0.91-1.91; p=0.15), OS (HR 1.10; 95%CI 0.90-1.35; p=0.35), or DFS (HR 1.12; 95%CI 0.98-1.29; p=0.11). Grade 3 toxicity was 9.6% PBI v 7.1% WBI, and grade 4-5 toxicity was 0.5% v 0.3%, respectively. Discussion: PBI did not meet the criteria for equivalence to WBI in controlling IBTR based on the upper limit of the hazard ratio confidence interval. However, the absolute difference in 10-yr rate of IBTR was Support: U10CA180868, -180822, UG1CA189867. Citation Format: Vicini FA, Cecchini RS, White JR, Julian TB, Arthur DW, Rabinovitch RA, Kuske RR, Parda DS, Ganz PA, Scheier MF, Winter KA, Paik S, Kuerer HM, Vallow LA, Pierce LJ, Mamounas EP, Costantino JP, Bear HD, Germaine I, Gustafson G, Grossheim L, Petersen IA, Hudes RS, Curran, Jr. WJ, Wolmark N. Primary results of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 (NRG Oncology): A ran","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81780357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45
Abstract GS3-05: Prospective optimization of estrogen receptor degradation yields ER ligands with variable capacities for ER transcriptional suppression 摘要GS3-05:雌激素受体降解的前瞻性优化产生具有可变ER转录抑制能力的ER配体
Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-05
Ciara Metcalfe, Wei Zhou, Jane Guan, A. Daemen, M. Hafner, R. Blake, E. Ingalla, Amy E. Young, J. Oeh, T. Bruyn, S. Ubhayakar, I. Chen, J. Giltnane, Jun Li, Xiaojing Wang, D. Sampath, J. Hager, L. Friedman
ER+ breast cancers can depend on ER signaling throughout disease progression, including after acquired resistance to existing endocrine agents, providing a rationale for further optimization and development of ER-targeting agents. Fulvestrant is unique amongst currently approved ER ligand therapeutics due to classification as a full ER antagonist, which is thought to be achieved through degradation of ER protein. However, the full clinical potential of fulvestrant is believed to be limited by poor bioavailability, spurring attempts to generate ligands capable of driving ER degradation but with improved drug-like properties. Here, we evaluate three ER ligand clinical candidates that recently emerged from prospective optimization of ER degradation – GDC-0810, AZD9496 and GDC-0927 - and show that they display distinct mechanistic features. GDC-0810 and AZD9496 are more limited in their ER degradation capacity relative to GDC-0927 and fulvestrant, display evidence of weak transcriptional activation of ER in breast cancer cells (i.e. partial agonist activity), and do not achieve the same degree of in vitro anti-proliferative activity as GDC-0927 and fulvestrant. In the HCI-013 (ER.Y537S) and HCI-011 (ER.WT) ER+ patient-derived xenograft models, GDC-0927 drives greater transcriptional suppression of ER, and greater anti-tumor activity relative to GDC-0810. We found that despite their full antagonist phenotype, GDC-0927 and fulvestrant promote association of ER with DNA, including at canonical ERE motifs, prior to ER degradation. Interestingly however, integration of ER ChIP-Seq and ATAC-Seq data revealed that ER complexed with fulvestrant or GDC-0927 fails to increase chromatin accessibility at DNA binding sites, in contrast to partial agonists which result in increased chromatin accessibility at ER binding sites. Thus, although ER contacts DNA when engaged with fulvestrant and GDC-0927, it is functionally inert. To further explore mechanistic features that might account for the differential activity of full antagonists and partial agonists that occurs prior to ER degradation, we used cell-based florescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to measure the kinetics of ER diffusion within the nucleus. We demonstrate that while ER is generally highly mobile, including after engagement with GDC-0810 and AZD9496, GDC-0927 and fulvestrant immobilize intra-nuclear ER. A site saturating mutagenesis screen revealed a series of novel ER mutations that prevent ER immobilization by fulvestrant and GDC-0927. This class of “always mobile” ER variants promotes an antagonist-to-agonist transcriptional switch for fulvestrant and GDC-0927, and simultaneously prevents ER degradation by these molecules, implying that ER immobilization is a key functional determinant of robust transcriptional suppression. We thus propose that ER degradation is not a driver of full ER antagonism, but rather a downstream consequence of ER immobilization, occurring after a suppressive phen
在整个疾病进展过程中,包括对现有内分泌药物获得性耐药后,雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌可能依赖于雌激素受体信号,这为进一步优化和开发雌激素受体靶向药物提供了依据。Fulvestrant在目前批准的内质网配体治疗药物中是独一无二的,因为它被归类为完全内质网拮抗剂,这被认为是通过内质网蛋白的降解来实现的。然而,氟维司汀的全部临床潜力被认为受到生物利用度差的限制,这促使人们尝试生成能够驱动内质网降解但具有改进的药物样特性的配体。在这里,我们评估了最近从内质网降解的前瞻性优化中出现的三种内质网配体临床候选者- GDC-0810, AZD9496和GDC-0927 -并表明它们具有不同的机制特征。相对于GDC-0927和氟维司汀,GDC-0810和AZD9496的内质网降解能力更有限,在乳腺癌细胞中显示出较弱的内质网转录激活证据(即部分激动剂活性),并且在体外不能达到与GDC-0927和氟维司汀相同的抗增殖活性。在HCI-013 (ER. y537s)和HCI-011 (ER. wt) ER+患者来源的异种移植物模型中,相对于GDC-0810, GDC-0927对ER的转录抑制更大,抗肿瘤活性更强。我们发现,尽管GDC-0927和氟维司汀具有完全拮抗剂表型,但在内质网降解之前,它们促进了内质网与DNA的关联,包括典型的内质网基序。然而,有趣的是,整合ER ChIP-Seq和ATAC-Seq数据显示,与部分激动剂相比,ER与氟维斯汀或GDC-0927复合物不能增加DNA结合位点的染色质可及性,而部分激动剂可以增加ER结合位点的染色质可及性。因此,虽然ER与氟维司汀和GDC-0927接触DNA,但它在功能上是惰性的。为了进一步探索可能解释内质网降解之前发生的完全拮抗剂和部分激动剂活性差异的机制特征,我们使用基于细胞的光漂白后荧光恢复(FRAP)来测量内质网在细胞核内扩散的动力学。研究表明,虽然内质网通常具有高流动性,包括与GDC-0810和AZD9496作用后,但GDC-0927和fulvestrant可固定核内内质网。位点饱和诱变筛选揭示了一系列新的内质网突变,这些突变阻止了氟维司汀和GDC-0927对内质网的固定。这类“始终移动”的内质网变体促进了氟维司汀和GDC-0927的拮抗剂到激动剂的转录转换,同时阻止了这些分子对内质网的降解,这意味着内质网固定化是强大的转录抑制的关键功能决定因素。因此,我们提出内质网降解不是内质网完全拮抗的驱动因素,而是内质网固定的下游结果,发生在染色质上建立了抑制性表型之后。我们还认为,评估候选内质网疗法的转录输出,包括临床前和临床,对于鉴定具有同类最佳潜力的内质网配体至关重要。引用格式:Metcalfe C, Zhou W, Guan J, Daemen A, Hafner M, Blake RA, Ingalla E, Young A, Oeh J, De Bruyn T, Ubhayakar S, Chen I, Giltnane JM, Li J, Wang X, Sampath D, Hager JH, Friedman LS。雌激素受体降解的前瞻性优化产生具有可变ER转录抑制能力的内质网配体[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS3-05。
{"title":"Abstract GS3-05: Prospective optimization of estrogen receptor degradation yields ER ligands with variable capacities for ER transcriptional suppression","authors":"Ciara Metcalfe, Wei Zhou, Jane Guan, A. Daemen, M. Hafner, R. Blake, E. Ingalla, Amy E. Young, J. Oeh, T. Bruyn, S. Ubhayakar, I. Chen, J. Giltnane, Jun Li, Xiaojing Wang, D. Sampath, J. Hager, L. Friedman","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-05","url":null,"abstract":"ER+ breast cancers can depend on ER signaling throughout disease progression, including after acquired resistance to existing endocrine agents, providing a rationale for further optimization and development of ER-targeting agents. Fulvestrant is unique amongst currently approved ER ligand therapeutics due to classification as a full ER antagonist, which is thought to be achieved through degradation of ER protein. However, the full clinical potential of fulvestrant is believed to be limited by poor bioavailability, spurring attempts to generate ligands capable of driving ER degradation but with improved drug-like properties. Here, we evaluate three ER ligand clinical candidates that recently emerged from prospective optimization of ER degradation – GDC-0810, AZD9496 and GDC-0927 - and show that they display distinct mechanistic features. GDC-0810 and AZD9496 are more limited in their ER degradation capacity relative to GDC-0927 and fulvestrant, display evidence of weak transcriptional activation of ER in breast cancer cells (i.e. partial agonist activity), and do not achieve the same degree of in vitro anti-proliferative activity as GDC-0927 and fulvestrant. In the HCI-013 (ER.Y537S) and HCI-011 (ER.WT) ER+ patient-derived xenograft models, GDC-0927 drives greater transcriptional suppression of ER, and greater anti-tumor activity relative to GDC-0810. We found that despite their full antagonist phenotype, GDC-0927 and fulvestrant promote association of ER with DNA, including at canonical ERE motifs, prior to ER degradation. Interestingly however, integration of ER ChIP-Seq and ATAC-Seq data revealed that ER complexed with fulvestrant or GDC-0927 fails to increase chromatin accessibility at DNA binding sites, in contrast to partial agonists which result in increased chromatin accessibility at ER binding sites. Thus, although ER contacts DNA when engaged with fulvestrant and GDC-0927, it is functionally inert. To further explore mechanistic features that might account for the differential activity of full antagonists and partial agonists that occurs prior to ER degradation, we used cell-based florescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to measure the kinetics of ER diffusion within the nucleus. We demonstrate that while ER is generally highly mobile, including after engagement with GDC-0810 and AZD9496, GDC-0927 and fulvestrant immobilize intra-nuclear ER. A site saturating mutagenesis screen revealed a series of novel ER mutations that prevent ER immobilization by fulvestrant and GDC-0927. This class of “always mobile” ER variants promotes an antagonist-to-agonist transcriptional switch for fulvestrant and GDC-0927, and simultaneously prevents ER degradation by these molecules, implying that ER immobilization is a key functional determinant of robust transcriptional suppression. We thus propose that ER degradation is not a driver of full ER antagonism, but rather a downstream consequence of ER immobilization, occurring after a suppressive phen","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"31 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82017929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract GS2-05: Impact of the delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in the outcomes of triple negative breast cancer 摘要GS2-05:延迟开始辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌预后的影响
Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS2-05
Z. Morante, R. Ruiz, G. Ku, F. Namuche, R. Mantilla, M. Luján, H. Fuentes, J. Schwarz, A. Aguilar, S. Neciosup, H. Gómez
Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy decreases the risk of recurrence and improves survival rates but it is unclear whether a delayed initiation is associated with adverse outcomes. Information available is especially scarce for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) which represents a high-risk group. We evaluated the influence of time to chemotherapy (TTC) on TNBC patient9s survival outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data using the medical records of TNBC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy at Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas between 2000-2014. TTC was defined as the number of days between surgery and the first dose of chemotherapy. Patients were categorized into 4 groups according to TTC: ≤30, 31-60, 61-90, ≥91 days. We evaluated recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used. Results: 687 patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 49.15 (range, 21-89) and most patients were stage II (60.1%) or III (29.45%). They received either anthracyclines or anthracyclines and taxane-based chemotherapy (96.1%). Median TTC was 41 days. 189 (27.5%) received chemotherapy at or before 30 days; 329 (47.9%), between 31 and 60 days; 115 (16.7%), between 61 and 90 days and; 54 (7.9%) beyond 90 days. Median follow-up was 101 months. 10y-DFS was 81.4%, 68.6%, 70.8% and 68.1% among patients who received chemotherapy ≤30, 31-60, 61-90, ≥91 days, respectively (p=0.005). Accordingly, 10y-OS was 82%, 67.4%, 67.1% and 65.1% among patients who received chemotherapy ≤30, 31-60, 61-90, ≥91 days, respectively (p=0.003). In the multivariate analysis, TTC was an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS. Patients with TTC of 31-60 days (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.225 to 2.998), 61-90 days (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.354 to 4.172) and ≥91days (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.250 to 4.886); had worse survival compared with those who initiated treatment in the first 30 days after surgery. Patients with TTC of 31-60 days (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.243 to 3.034), 61-90 days (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.402 to 4.265) and ≥91days (HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.418 to 5.506); had worse survival compared with those who initiated treatment in the first 30 days after surgery. Conclusion: Delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC patients over 30 days is associated with a decrease in RFS and OS rates. The greater the delay, the worse the outcomes. As this represents a feasible opportunity for improvement, every attempt should be made to avoid delayed adjuvant chemotherapy initiation in this high-risk group of patients. Citation Format: Morante Z, Ruiz R, De la Cruz - Ku G, Namuche F, Mantilla R, Lujan MG, Fuentes H, Schwarz J, Aguilar A, Neciosup S, Gomez H. Impact of the delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in the outcomes of triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;7
背景:辅助化疗可降低复发风险,提高生存率,但尚不清楚延迟化疗是否与不良后果相关。关于三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的信息尤其缺乏,这是一个高危群体。我们评估了化疗时间(TTC)对TNBC患者生存结局的影响。方法:回顾性分析2000-2014年在国立肿瘤研究所接受辅助化疗的TNBC患者的病历资料。TTC定义为手术至第一次化疗之间的天数。根据TTC分为≤30天、31-60天、61-90天、≥91天4组。我们评估了无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用Logistic回归和Cox比例风险模型。结果:纳入687例患者。诊断时的平均年龄为49.15岁(范围21-89岁),大多数患者为II期(60.1%)或III期(29.45%)。接受蒽环类药物或蒽环类药物联合紫杉烷化疗(96.1%)。中位TTC为41天。189例(27.5%)在30天或之前接受化疗;329人(47.9%),在31至60天之间;115人(16.7%),61至90天;超过90天的54个(7.9%)。中位随访时间为101个月。化疗≤30天、31-60天、61-90天、≥91天患者的10y-DFS分别为81.4%、68.6%、70.8%、68.1% (p=0.005)。在化疗≤30天、31-60天、61-90天、≥91天的患者中,10y-OS分别为82%、67.4%、67.1%和65.1% (p=0.003)。在多变量分析中,TTC是RFS和OS的独立预后因素。TTC为31-60天的患者(HR, 1.92;95% CI, 1.225 ~ 2.998), 61 ~ 90天(HR, 2.38;95% CI, 1.354 ~ 4.172)和≥91天(HR, 2.47;95% CI, 1.250 ~ 4.886);与术后30天内开始治疗的患者相比,生存率更低。TTC为31-60天的患者(HR, 1.94;95% CI, 1.243 ~ 3.034), 61 ~ 90天(HR, 2.45;95% CI, 1.402 ~ 4.265)和≥91天(HR, 2.79;95% CI, 1.418 ~ 5.506);与术后30天内开始治疗的患者相比,生存率更低。结论:TNBC患者延迟开始辅助化疗超过30天与RFS和OS率降低相关。拖延得越久,结果就越糟。由于这是一个可行的改善机会,因此应尽一切努力避免这一高危患者延迟开始辅助化疗。引用格式:Morante Z, Ruiz R, De la Cruz - Ku G, Namuche F, Mantilla R, Lujan MG, Fuentes H, Schwarz J, Aguilar A, Neciosup S, Gomez H.延迟开始辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌预后的影响[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS2-05。
{"title":"Abstract GS2-05: Impact of the delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in the outcomes of triple negative breast cancer","authors":"Z. Morante, R. Ruiz, G. Ku, F. Namuche, R. Mantilla, M. Luján, H. Fuentes, J. Schwarz, A. Aguilar, S. Neciosup, H. Gómez","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS2-05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS2-05","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy decreases the risk of recurrence and improves survival rates but it is unclear whether a delayed initiation is associated with adverse outcomes. Information available is especially scarce for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) which represents a high-risk group. We evaluated the influence of time to chemotherapy (TTC) on TNBC patient9s survival outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data using the medical records of TNBC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy at Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas between 2000-2014. TTC was defined as the number of days between surgery and the first dose of chemotherapy. Patients were categorized into 4 groups according to TTC: ≤30, 31-60, 61-90, ≥91 days. We evaluated recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used. Results: 687 patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 49.15 (range, 21-89) and most patients were stage II (60.1%) or III (29.45%). They received either anthracyclines or anthracyclines and taxane-based chemotherapy (96.1%). Median TTC was 41 days. 189 (27.5%) received chemotherapy at or before 30 days; 329 (47.9%), between 31 and 60 days; 115 (16.7%), between 61 and 90 days and; 54 (7.9%) beyond 90 days. Median follow-up was 101 months. 10y-DFS was 81.4%, 68.6%, 70.8% and 68.1% among patients who received chemotherapy ≤30, 31-60, 61-90, ≥91 days, respectively (p=0.005). Accordingly, 10y-OS was 82%, 67.4%, 67.1% and 65.1% among patients who received chemotherapy ≤30, 31-60, 61-90, ≥91 days, respectively (p=0.003). In the multivariate analysis, TTC was an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS. Patients with TTC of 31-60 days (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.225 to 2.998), 61-90 days (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.354 to 4.172) and ≥91days (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.250 to 4.886); had worse survival compared with those who initiated treatment in the first 30 days after surgery. Patients with TTC of 31-60 days (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.243 to 3.034), 61-90 days (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.402 to 4.265) and ≥91days (HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.418 to 5.506); had worse survival compared with those who initiated treatment in the first 30 days after surgery. Conclusion: Delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC patients over 30 days is associated with a decrease in RFS and OS rates. The greater the delay, the worse the outcomes. As this represents a feasible opportunity for improvement, every attempt should be made to avoid delayed adjuvant chemotherapy initiation in this high-risk group of patients. Citation Format: Morante Z, Ruiz R, De la Cruz - Ku G, Namuche F, Mantilla R, Lujan MG, Fuentes H, Schwarz J, Aguilar A, Neciosup S, Gomez H. Impact of the delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in the outcomes of triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;7","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74862543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract GS3-08: Alpelisib + fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer: Subgroup analyses from the phase III SOLAR-1 trial GS3-08: Alpelisib + fulvestrant治疗晚期乳腺癌:来自III期SOLAR-1试验的亚组分析
Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-08
D. Juric, E. Ciruelos, G. Rubovszky, M. Campone, S. Loibl, H. Rugo, H. Iwata, P. Conte, I. Mayer, B. Kaufman, T. Yamashita, Y. Lu, Kenichi Inoue, M. Takahashi, Z. Pápai, A. Longin, D. Mills, C. Wilke, D. Sellami, F. André
Background: Hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway can occur due to PIK3CA mutations, present in ~40% of patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2—) ABC. SOLAR-1, a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind trial (NCT02437318), investigated efficacy and safety of ALP (α-specific PI3K inhibitor) + FUL in pts with HR+, HER2— ABC. ALP+FUL met the primary endpoint by significantly extending progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo (PBO) + FUL in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; 95% CI 0.50—0.85; p=0.00065; median 11.0 vs 5.7 months). Here we report overall survival (OS), subgroup data and safety in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort, and PFS by circulating tumor (ct)DNA PIK3CA mutation status in the total population. Methods: Enrollment was open to men/postmenopausal women with PIK3CA-mutant HR+, HER2— ABC and 1 prior line of endocrine therapy. Pts were randomized (1:1) to ALP (300mg/day) + FUL (500mg every 28 days and Cycle 1 Day 15) or PBO+FUL. OS was the key secondary endpoint. PFS was analyzed by PIK3CA mutant status in ctDNA, and in important prognostic subgroups, including line of treatment in ABC and prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) use. Safety was analyzed in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort. Results: 341 pts in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort received ALP+FUL (n=169) or PBO+FUL (n=172). Median follow-up from randomization to data cut-off was 20.0 months. At data cut-off, 92 deaths had occurred (52% of the total 178 pts planned for final OS analysis); 40 for ALP+FUL (24%) and 52 for PBO+FUL (30%). OS results were immature at data cut-off (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.48—1.10; p=0.06; median not estimable vs 26.9 months). There was a 45% risk reduction in PFS for pts with ctDNA PIK3CA mutations (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.39—0.79; n=186); 20% for pts without (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.60—1.06; n=363). PFS treatment effect for ALP+FUL vs PBO+FUL was generally consistent across subgroups of interest, with a risk reduction of 29% for pts receiving first-line (1L) treatment (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.49—1.03; n=177), and 39% for 2L treatment (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.42—0.89; n=161); 52% in pts with prior CDK4/6i (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.17—1.36; n=20) and 33% in pts without (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.51—0.87; n=321). Most frequent all-grade adverse events (AEs; ≥40% in either arm by single preferred term; ALP+FUL vs PBO+FUL) were hyperglycemia (65% vs 9%), diarrhea (54% vs 11%), nausea (46% vs 20%), and rash (40% vs 6%). Grade 3/4 AEs in ≥10% pts in either arm were hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose >250mg/dL; 37% for ALP+FUL vs Conclusions: ALP+FUL showed consistent clinically meaningful treatment benefit for pts with ctDNA PIK3CA mutant status, and across pt subgroups, including pts with/without prior treatment for ABC and prior CDK4/6i use. OS data were not yet mature at the data cut-off, but OS appeared numerically longer for ALP+FUL vs PBO+FUL after 52% of events. Key words: advanced breast can
背景:PIK3CA突变可导致磷脂酰肌醇-3激酶(PI3K)通路过度激活,约40%的激素受体阳性(HR+)、人表皮生长因子受体2-阴性(HER2 -) ABC患者中存在PIK3CA突变。SOLAR-1是一项3期随机双盲试验(NCT02437318),研究了ALP (α-特异性PI3K抑制剂)+ FUL治疗HR+、HER2 - ABC患者的疗效和安全性。与安慰剂(PBO) +FUL相比,在pik3ca突变队列中,ALP+FUL通过显著延长无进展生存期(PFS)达到了主要终点(风险比[HR] 0.65;95% ci 0.50-0.85;p = 0.00065;中位11.0 vs 5.7个月)。在这里,我们报告了PIK3CA突变队列的总生存期(OS)、亚组数据和安全性,以及总体人群中循环肿瘤(ct)DNA PIK3CA突变状态的PFS。方法:纳入pik3ca突变的HR+, HER2 - ABC和1种既往内分泌治疗的男性/绝经后女性。患者随机(1:1)分为ALP (300mg/天)+FUL (500mg / 28天,周期1第15天)或PBO+FUL。OS是关键的次要终点。通过ctDNA中的PIK3CA突变状态和重要预后亚组(包括ABC治疗线和先前使用周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i))来分析PFS。在pik3ca突变队列中分析安全性。结果:在pik3ca突变队列中,341名患者接受了ALP+FUL (n=169)或PBO+FUL (n=172)。从随机分组到数据截止的中位随访时间为20.0个月。截止数据时,发生92例死亡(占计划进行最终OS分析的178例患者的52%);ALP+FUL 40例(24%),PBO+FUL 52例(30%)。截止数据时OS结果不成熟(HR 0.73;95% ci 0.48-1.10;p = 0.06;中位数不可估计vs 26.9个月)。携带ctDNA PIK3CA突变的患者发生PFS的风险降低了45% (HR 0.55;95% ci 0.39-0.79;n = 186);20%的患者没有(HR 0.80;95% ci 0.60-1.06;n = 363)。PFS治疗ALP+FUL与PBO+FUL的效果在各亚组中基本一致,接受一线(1L)治疗的患者风险降低29% (HR 0.71;95% ci 0.49-1.03;n=177), 2L组39% (HR 0.61;95% ci 0.42-0.89;n = 161);既往CDK4/6i患者占52% (HR 0.48;95% ci 0.17-1.36;n=20)和33%的患者没有(HR 0.67;95% ci 0.51-0.87;n = 321)。最常见的所有级别不良事件(ae;单首选治疗组≥40%;ALP+FUL vs PBO+FUL)分别为高血糖(65% vs 9%)、腹泻(54% vs 11%)、恶心(46% vs 20%)和皮疹(40% vs 6%)。两组≥10%患者的3/4级ae均为高血糖(空腹血糖>250mg/dL;ALP+FUL vs结论:ALP+FUL对ctDNA PIK3CA突变状态的患者显示出一致的临床有意义的治疗益处,并且跨pt亚组,包括接受/未接受ABC治疗和既往使用CDK4/6i的患者。在数据截止时,OS数据尚未成熟,但在52%的事件发生后,ALP+FUL与PBO+FUL的OS时间更长。关键词:晚期乳腺癌;PI3K;alpelisib;引用格式:Juric D, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G, Campone M, Loibl S, Rugo HS, Iwata H, Conte P, Mayer IA, Kaufman B, Yamashita T, Lu Y-S, Inoue K, Takahashi M, Papai Z, Longin A-S, Mills D, Wilke C, Sellami D, Andre F. Alpelisib + fulvestrant治疗晚期乳腺癌:来自SOLAR-1期临床试验的亚组分析[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS3-08。
{"title":"Abstract GS3-08: Alpelisib + fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer: Subgroup analyses from the phase III SOLAR-1 trial","authors":"D. Juric, E. Ciruelos, G. Rubovszky, M. Campone, S. Loibl, H. Rugo, H. Iwata, P. Conte, I. Mayer, B. Kaufman, T. Yamashita, Y. Lu, Kenichi Inoue, M. Takahashi, Z. Pápai, A. Longin, D. Mills, C. Wilke, D. Sellami, F. André","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-08","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway can occur due to PIK3CA mutations, present in ~40% of patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2—) ABC. SOLAR-1, a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind trial (NCT02437318), investigated efficacy and safety of ALP (α-specific PI3K inhibitor) + FUL in pts with HR+, HER2— ABC. ALP+FUL met the primary endpoint by significantly extending progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo (PBO) + FUL in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; 95% CI 0.50—0.85; p=0.00065; median 11.0 vs 5.7 months). Here we report overall survival (OS), subgroup data and safety in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort, and PFS by circulating tumor (ct)DNA PIK3CA mutation status in the total population. Methods: Enrollment was open to men/postmenopausal women with PIK3CA-mutant HR+, HER2— ABC and 1 prior line of endocrine therapy. Pts were randomized (1:1) to ALP (300mg/day) + FUL (500mg every 28 days and Cycle 1 Day 15) or PBO+FUL. OS was the key secondary endpoint. PFS was analyzed by PIK3CA mutant status in ctDNA, and in important prognostic subgroups, including line of treatment in ABC and prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) use. Safety was analyzed in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort. Results: 341 pts in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort received ALP+FUL (n=169) or PBO+FUL (n=172). Median follow-up from randomization to data cut-off was 20.0 months. At data cut-off, 92 deaths had occurred (52% of the total 178 pts planned for final OS analysis); 40 for ALP+FUL (24%) and 52 for PBO+FUL (30%). OS results were immature at data cut-off (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.48—1.10; p=0.06; median not estimable vs 26.9 months). There was a 45% risk reduction in PFS for pts with ctDNA PIK3CA mutations (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.39—0.79; n=186); 20% for pts without (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.60—1.06; n=363). PFS treatment effect for ALP+FUL vs PBO+FUL was generally consistent across subgroups of interest, with a risk reduction of 29% for pts receiving first-line (1L) treatment (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.49—1.03; n=177), and 39% for 2L treatment (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.42—0.89; n=161); 52% in pts with prior CDK4/6i (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.17—1.36; n=20) and 33% in pts without (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.51—0.87; n=321). Most frequent all-grade adverse events (AEs; ≥40% in either arm by single preferred term; ALP+FUL vs PBO+FUL) were hyperglycemia (65% vs 9%), diarrhea (54% vs 11%), nausea (46% vs 20%), and rash (40% vs 6%). Grade 3/4 AEs in ≥10% pts in either arm were hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose >250mg/dL; 37% for ALP+FUL vs Conclusions: ALP+FUL showed consistent clinically meaningful treatment benefit for pts with ctDNA PIK3CA mutant status, and across pt subgroups, including pts with/without prior treatment for ABC and prior CDK4/6i use. OS data were not yet mature at the data cut-off, but OS appeared numerically longer for ALP+FUL vs PBO+FUL after 52% of events. Key words: advanced breast can","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89913332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53
Abstract GS1-03: Crosstalk between osteoblasts and breast cancer cells alters breast cancer proliferation through multiple mechanisms GS1-03:成骨细胞与乳腺癌细胞之间的串扰通过多种机制改变乳腺癌的增殖
Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS1-03
K. Bussard, A. Shupp, Alexus D Kolb, D. Mukhopdhyay
BrCa preferentially metastasizes to bone, where the 5-year relative survival rate is In a cancer-free environment in the adult, the skeleton continuously undergoes remodeling. Osteoclasts excavate erosion cavities and osteoblasts (OB) synthesize bone matrix, with no net bone gain or loss. However, when metastatic BCC invade bone, this balance is disrupted to favor bone loss. Bisphosphonate treatments are not curative. OBs do not deposit new bone. This result suggests that OBs may be altered or experience a loss-of-function in the tumor niche. We have new, late-breaking evidence to suggest that communication between OBs and BCCs 9educates9 OBs to produce factors that suppress BCC proliferation in bone. We have in-vitro and in-vivo mouse-model evidence that 9educated9 osteoblasts (EOs) have a unique secretory protein profile compared to 9uneducated9 OBs. We also identified EOs as being present in the bone tissue samples of human patients with bone metastatic BrCa via multi-plex immunofluorescence. When we treated BCCs with EO conditioned media (CM), BCC proliferation was reduced in both triple negative and ER+ metastatic BCCs, while CM from 9uneducated9 OBs did not affect BCC proliferation. This effect was mediated through alterations in EO production of decorin and NOV. We identified EO CM as a rich source of exosomes (exo) and confirmed the presence of an exo population via iodixanol density gradient and western blotting for specific exo protein markers. We found that EO-derived exo, but not 9uneducated9 OB-derived exo, decreased proliferation of ER+ and triple negative BCC. Also, treatment with EO-derived exosomes increased the number of Ki67 negative metastatic BCC. Moreover, we labeled EO exo with RFP-conjugated CD63 to visually confirm exo transfer from EO cells to BCCs using confocal microscopy. And, co-culture with EOs increased triple negative and ER+ metastatic BrCa expression of p21 compared to co-cultures with 9uneducated9 OBs. Our data suggest that EOs use multiple mechanisms of cellular communication to regulate BCC proliferation in bone. Impact: Our late-breaking data suggest that OBs produce factors that suppress metastatic BCC growth. Much less attention has been given to OB interactions with tumor cells at sites of bone metastasis due to observations that OB populations are reduced at sites of advanced osteolysis. However, we propose that OBs may be valuable endogenous targets to aid in restoration of bone deposition and suppression of metastatic BrCa growth in the niche in concert with therapeutic drugs to kill the cancer cells. Our data suggest there is a population of OBs that demonstrate a functional role in retarding metastatic BCC growth; a property capable of exploitation. Moreover, restoration of the OBs9 ability to deposit new bone would lead to better quality of life and increased time of survival for bone metastatic BrCa patients where bone loss is found. For these reasons, OBs and EOs are suitable candidates for therap
BrCa优先转移到骨骼,其5年相对存活率在成人无癌环境中,骨骼不断经历重塑。破骨细胞挖掘侵蚀腔和成骨细胞(OB)合成骨基质,没有净骨增加或损失。然而,当转移性基底细胞癌侵入骨时,这种平衡被破坏,有利于骨质流失。双膦酸盐治疗无效。ob不会沉积新骨。这一结果表明ob可能在肿瘤生态位中发生改变或经历功能丧失。我们有新的、最新的证据表明,OBs和BCC之间的交流教育OBs产生抑制骨中BCC增殖的因子。我们有体外和体内小鼠模型证据表明,与未受过教育的成骨细胞相比,受过教育的成骨细胞(EOs)具有独特的分泌蛋白谱。我们还通过多重免疫荧光鉴定了EOs存在于骨转移性BrCa患者的骨组织样本中。当我们用EO条件培养基(CM)处理BCC时,三阴性和ER+转移性BCC的BCC增殖均减少,而未受过教育的BCC的CM不影响BCC增殖。这种影响是通过修饰素和11的EO产生的改变来介导的。我们确定EO CM是外泌体(exo)的丰富来源,并通过碘二醇密度梯度和特异性外泌体蛋白标记物的western blotting证实了外泌体群体的存在。我们发现eo衍生的exo,而非未经教育的ob衍生的exo,可以降低ER+和三阴性BCC的增殖。此外,eo来源的外泌体治疗增加了Ki67阴性转移性BCC的数量。此外,我们用rfp偶联的CD63标记EO外显子,用共聚焦显微镜视觉上确认外显子从EO细胞转移到bcc。与未受过教育的ob共培养相比,与EOs共培养增加了p21的三阴性和ER+转移性BrCa表达。我们的数据表明,EOs使用多种细胞通讯机制来调节骨中的BCC增殖。影响:我们最新的数据表明OBs产生抑制转移性BCC生长的因子。由于观察到OB在晚期骨溶解部位减少,因此很少关注OB与骨转移部位肿瘤细胞的相互作用。然而,我们提出OBs可能是有价值的内源性靶点,有助于恢复骨沉积和抑制转移性BrCa生长,协同治疗药物杀死癌细胞。我们的数据表明,有一群ob在延缓转移性基底细胞癌生长方面表现出功能性作用;可以利用的财产。此外,恢复OBs9沉积新骨的能力将为发现骨丢失的骨转移性BrCa患者带来更好的生活质量和延长生存时间。由于这些原因,OBs和EOs是治疗靶向的合适候选者,并将为延缓BrCa骨转移的生长开辟新的途径。引文格式:Bussard KM, Shupp AB, Kolb AD, Mukhopdhyay D.成骨细胞与乳腺癌细胞间的串扰通过多种机制改变乳腺癌的增殖[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS1-03。
{"title":"Abstract GS1-03: Crosstalk between osteoblasts and breast cancer cells alters breast cancer proliferation through multiple mechanisms","authors":"K. Bussard, A. Shupp, Alexus D Kolb, D. Mukhopdhyay","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS1-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS1-03","url":null,"abstract":"BrCa preferentially metastasizes to bone, where the 5-year relative survival rate is In a cancer-free environment in the adult, the skeleton continuously undergoes remodeling. Osteoclasts excavate erosion cavities and osteoblasts (OB) synthesize bone matrix, with no net bone gain or loss. However, when metastatic BCC invade bone, this balance is disrupted to favor bone loss. Bisphosphonate treatments are not curative. OBs do not deposit new bone. This result suggests that OBs may be altered or experience a loss-of-function in the tumor niche. We have new, late-breaking evidence to suggest that communication between OBs and BCCs 9educates9 OBs to produce factors that suppress BCC proliferation in bone. We have in-vitro and in-vivo mouse-model evidence that 9educated9 osteoblasts (EOs) have a unique secretory protein profile compared to 9uneducated9 OBs. We also identified EOs as being present in the bone tissue samples of human patients with bone metastatic BrCa via multi-plex immunofluorescence. When we treated BCCs with EO conditioned media (CM), BCC proliferation was reduced in both triple negative and ER+ metastatic BCCs, while CM from 9uneducated9 OBs did not affect BCC proliferation. This effect was mediated through alterations in EO production of decorin and NOV. We identified EO CM as a rich source of exosomes (exo) and confirmed the presence of an exo population via iodixanol density gradient and western blotting for specific exo protein markers. We found that EO-derived exo, but not 9uneducated9 OB-derived exo, decreased proliferation of ER+ and triple negative BCC. Also, treatment with EO-derived exosomes increased the number of Ki67 negative metastatic BCC. Moreover, we labeled EO exo with RFP-conjugated CD63 to visually confirm exo transfer from EO cells to BCCs using confocal microscopy. And, co-culture with EOs increased triple negative and ER+ metastatic BrCa expression of p21 compared to co-cultures with 9uneducated9 OBs. Our data suggest that EOs use multiple mechanisms of cellular communication to regulate BCC proliferation in bone. Impact: Our late-breaking data suggest that OBs produce factors that suppress metastatic BCC growth. Much less attention has been given to OB interactions with tumor cells at sites of bone metastasis due to observations that OB populations are reduced at sites of advanced osteolysis. However, we propose that OBs may be valuable endogenous targets to aid in restoration of bone deposition and suppression of metastatic BrCa growth in the niche in concert with therapeutic drugs to kill the cancer cells. Our data suggest there is a population of OBs that demonstrate a functional role in retarding metastatic BCC growth; a property capable of exploitation. Moreover, restoration of the OBs9 ability to deposit new bone would lead to better quality of life and increased time of survival for bone metastatic BrCa patients where bone loss is found. For these reasons, OBs and EOs are suitable candidates for therap","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74793670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract GS6-02: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oxybutynin (Oxy) for hot flashes (HF): ACCRU study SC-1603 GS6-02:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的奥施布宁(Oxy)治疗潮热(HF)的试验:ACCRU研究SC-1603
Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS6-02
R. Leon-Ferre, P. Novotny, S. Faubion, K. Ruddy, D. Flora, C. Dakhil, K. Rowland, M. Graham, N. Le-Lindqwister, C. Loprinzi
Background: HF occur in about 75% of midlife women and are associated with quality of life disruption and premature endocrine therapy discontinuation among breast cancer survivors. Estrogen therapy, effective for HF, is contraindicated in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). Previous studies have suggested that Oxy could be effective in managing HF. Methods: This randomized, placebo (P)-controlled trial enrolled women who had experienced HF ≥28 times per week over >30 days and of sufficient severity to seek treatment. Patients (pts) were randomized to receive oral Oxy at two doses: 2.5mg BID for 6 weeks (Oxy2.5), 2.5mg BID for a week with subsequent increase to 5mg BID (Oxy5), or matching P, in equal ratios. Baseline and monthly questionnaires were administered including a HF diary, the HF related daily interference scale (HFRDIS) and a symptom experience questionnaire. The primary endpoint was intra-patient change in weekly HF score and frequency from baseline to end of study compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: 150 pts were accrued between 2/23/2017-3/5/2018. 4 pts cancelled before starting treatment and were excluded from analyses. This interim report includes the first 104 pts for which at least one post-baseline evaluation was available. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the arms. Sixty-two percent were on tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor for the duration of the study. Pts on both Oxy doses had a significantly greater reduction in HF score and frequency compared to P. Pts on Oxy2.5 had a mean change in HF score of -10 (SD 7.4) vs -5.1 (SD 9.7) with P, p=0.003; and a mean change in average weekly number of HF of -4.6 (SD 3.1) vs -2.3 (SD 3.9), p=0.002. Pts on Oxy5 had a mean change in HF score of -16.2 (SD 5.1) vs -5.1 (SD 9.7) with P, p Conclusions: Oxy is superior to P for management of HF. Oxy2.5 and 5 were both associated with significant improvements in HF scores and frequency as well as improvement in HF interference with several quality of life measures. While pts on Oxy experienced more side effects than pts on P, rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were low. This study was supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. Citation Format: Leon-Ferre RA, Novotny PJ, Faubion SS, Ruddy KJ, Flora D, Dakhil C, Rowland KM, Graham ML, Le-Lindqwister N, Loprinzi CL. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oxybutynin (Oxy) for hot flashes (HF): ACCRU study SC-1603 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-02.
背景:HF发生在约75%的中年妇女中,并与乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量中断和过早停止内分泌治疗有关。雌激素治疗对心衰有效,但对激素受体阳性乳腺癌(BC)是禁忌的。先前的研究表明氧可有效治疗心衰。方法:这项随机、安慰剂(P)对照试验招募了HF≥28次/周、超过30天且严重程度足以寻求治疗的女性。患者(pts)随机接受两种剂量的口服氧:2.5mg BID,持续6周(Oxy2.5), 2.5mg BID,持续一周,随后增加到5mg BID (Oxy5),或匹配的P,以相同的比例。进行基线和月度问卷调查,包括心衰日记、心衰相关日常干扰量表(HFRDIS)和症状体验问卷。主要终点是使用Kruskal-Wallis试验比较患者每周HF评分和频率从基线到研究结束的变化。结果:在2017年2月23日至2018年3月5日期间累计150分。4例PTS在开始治疗前取消,并被排除在分析之外。本中期报告包括至少有一次基线后评估的前104例患者。两臂之间的基线特征平衡良好。62%的人在研究期间服用了他莫昔芬或芳香化酶抑制剂。与P相比,两种剂量的患者HF评分和频率的降低均显著高于P。氧2.5组患者HF评分的平均变化为-10 (SD 7.4) vs -5.1 (SD 9.7), P =0.003;平均每周HF数的平均变化为-4.6 (SD 3.1) vs -2.3 (SD 3.9), p=0.002。服用Oxy5的患者HF评分的平均变化为-16.2 (SD 5.1) vs -5.1 (SD 9.7), P, P。结论:Oxy治疗HF优于P。Oxy2.5和5均与HF评分和频率的显著改善以及HF干扰与若干生活质量测量的改善相关。虽然服用奥施康定的患者比服用P的患者有更多的副作用,但由于不良事件而停药的比率很低。这项研究得到了乳腺癌研究基金会的支持。引文格式:Leon-Ferre RA, Novotny PJ, Faubion SS, Ruddy KJ, Flora D, Dakhil C, Rowland KM, Graham ML, Le-Lindqwister N, Loprinzi CL。一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的奥施布宁(Oxy)治疗潮热(HF)的试验:ACCRU研究SC-1603[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS6-02。
{"title":"Abstract GS6-02: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oxybutynin (Oxy) for hot flashes (HF): ACCRU study SC-1603","authors":"R. Leon-Ferre, P. Novotny, S. Faubion, K. Ruddy, D. Flora, C. Dakhil, K. Rowland, M. Graham, N. Le-Lindqwister, C. Loprinzi","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS6-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS6-02","url":null,"abstract":"Background: HF occur in about 75% of midlife women and are associated with quality of life disruption and premature endocrine therapy discontinuation among breast cancer survivors. Estrogen therapy, effective for HF, is contraindicated in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). Previous studies have suggested that Oxy could be effective in managing HF. Methods: This randomized, placebo (P)-controlled trial enrolled women who had experienced HF ≥28 times per week over >30 days and of sufficient severity to seek treatment. Patients (pts) were randomized to receive oral Oxy at two doses: 2.5mg BID for 6 weeks (Oxy2.5), 2.5mg BID for a week with subsequent increase to 5mg BID (Oxy5), or matching P, in equal ratios. Baseline and monthly questionnaires were administered including a HF diary, the HF related daily interference scale (HFRDIS) and a symptom experience questionnaire. The primary endpoint was intra-patient change in weekly HF score and frequency from baseline to end of study compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: 150 pts were accrued between 2/23/2017-3/5/2018. 4 pts cancelled before starting treatment and were excluded from analyses. This interim report includes the first 104 pts for which at least one post-baseline evaluation was available. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the arms. Sixty-two percent were on tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor for the duration of the study. Pts on both Oxy doses had a significantly greater reduction in HF score and frequency compared to P. Pts on Oxy2.5 had a mean change in HF score of -10 (SD 7.4) vs -5.1 (SD 9.7) with P, p=0.003; and a mean change in average weekly number of HF of -4.6 (SD 3.1) vs -2.3 (SD 3.9), p=0.002. Pts on Oxy5 had a mean change in HF score of -16.2 (SD 5.1) vs -5.1 (SD 9.7) with P, p Conclusions: Oxy is superior to P for management of HF. Oxy2.5 and 5 were both associated with significant improvements in HF scores and frequency as well as improvement in HF interference with several quality of life measures. While pts on Oxy experienced more side effects than pts on P, rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were low. This study was supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. Citation Format: Leon-Ferre RA, Novotny PJ, Faubion SS, Ruddy KJ, Flora D, Dakhil C, Rowland KM, Graham ML, Le-Lindqwister N, Loprinzi CL. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oxybutynin (Oxy) for hot flashes (HF): ACCRU study SC-1603 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-02.","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76902113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract GS5-01: A randomized community-based trial of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril or a beta blocker, carvedilol for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab GS5-01:一项基于社区的随机试验,在接受辅助曲妥珠单抗治疗的早期her2阳性乳腺癌患者中,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂莱诺普利或β受体阻滞剂卡维地洛预防心脏毒性
Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS5-01
P. Munster, J. Krischer, R. Tamura, A. Fink, L. Bello-Matricaria, M. Guilin
Background: Exposure to trastuzumab for one year is an integral part of therapy for patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Yet, cardiac side effects, particularly in patients who also receive anthracyclines require frequent monitoring and result in dose interruptions and discontinuation of trastuzumab. Prophylactic use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) nhibitors or beta blockers (BB) may prevent cardiotoxicity associated with chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Methods A large community-based prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, evaluated the rates of pre-specified cardiotoxicity in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with one year of trastuzumab. Cardiac events were followed for two years. Patients were randomized to simultaneously receive either the ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, or the BB, carvedilol, or placebo and were further stratified by anthracycline use to determine whether ACE inhibitors or BB can prevent trastuzumab-induced decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and trastuzumab interruptions. Results: The study included 468 eligible patients (median age:51, BMI:27 kg/m 2 , baseline systolic BP: 126mmHg and LVEF :63 ± 6.29%) from 127 community-based practices, 189 patients received an anthracycline. For the entire study population and the non-anthracycline group, no difference in number of trastuzumab interruptions were seen. For patients receiving an anthracycline, cardiac event rates were higher in the placebo group (47%), and reduced in both the lisinopril (37%), and the carvedilol (31%) groups. Interruptions of trastuzumab were required in 23% patients on lisinopril and 20% on carvedilol compared to 40% on placebo (p=0.007). Changes in LVEF from baseline (least square means, SE) were significantly reduced with both carvedilol (-4.5 (0.8), p=0.008, and lisinopril (-4.0 (0.8), p=0.002) than placebo, (-7.7 (0.8). Cardiotoxicity-free survival was longer on both carvedilol (hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence intervals 0.27, 0.89, p=0.009) or lisinopril (HR 0.53, CI 0.30, 0.94, p=0.015). Conclusions In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving trastuzumab and an anthracycline, both lisinopril and carvedilol during treatment reduced cardiotoxicity in patients, but not in those with non-anthracyline containing regimens. The use of lisinopril or carvedilol may allow the use of an anthracycline without compromising trastuzumab treatment in those who might benefit from an anthracycline. Citation Format: Munster P, Krischer J, Tamura R, Fink A, Bello-Matricaria L, Guilin M. A randomized community-based trial of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril or a beta blocker, carvedilol for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstrac
背景:曲妥珠单抗治疗一年是早期her2阳性乳腺癌患者治疗的一个组成部分。然而,心脏副作用,特别是同时接受蒽环类药物治疗的患者,需要经常监测,并导致曲妥珠单抗剂量中断和停药。预防性使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂或受体阻滞剂(BB)可以预防化疗和曲妥珠单抗相关的心脏毒性。方法一项大型社区前瞻性双盲、安慰剂对照试验,评估曲妥珠单抗治疗1年的早期乳腺癌患者预先指定的心脏毒性发生率。心脏事件随访两年。患者随机同时接受ACE抑制剂赖诺普利、BB、卡维地洛或安慰剂,并通过蒽环类药物进一步分层,以确定ACE抑制剂或BB是否可以预防曲妥珠单抗诱导的左室射血分数(LVEF)下降和曲妥珠单抗中断。结果:该研究纳入了来自127个社区实践的468例符合条件的患者(中位年龄:51岁,BMI:27 kg/ m2,基线收缩压:126mmHg, LVEF:63±6.29%),189例患者接受了蒽环类药物治疗。对于整个研究人群和非蒽环类药物组,曲妥珠单抗中断的数量没有差异。对于接受蒽环类药物治疗的患者,安慰剂组的心脏事件发生率较高(47%),赖诺普利组(37%)和卡维地洛组(31%)的心脏事件发生率均降低。赖诺普利组23%的患者和卡维地洛组20%的患者需要中断曲妥珠单抗治疗,而安慰剂组为40% (p=0.007)。卡维地洛组(-4.5 (0.8),p=0.008)和赖诺普利组(-4.0 (0.8),p=0.002)较安慰剂组(-7.7(0.8))显著降低LVEF基线变化(最小二乘平均值,SE)。卡维地洛(风险比0.49,95%可信区间0.27,0.89,p=0.009)或赖诺普利(HR 0.53, CI 0.30, 0.94, p=0.015)的无心脏毒性生存期更长。在接受曲妥珠单抗和蒽环类药物治疗的her2阳性乳腺癌患者中,赖诺普利和卡维地洛在治疗期间降低了患者的心脏毒性,但在不含蒽环类药物的患者中没有。赖诺普利或卡维地洛的使用可能允许在不影响曲妥珠单抗治疗的情况下使用蒽环类药物,这些患者可能从蒽环类药物获益。引用格式:Munster P, Krischer J, Tamura R, Fink A, ello- matricaria L, Guilin M.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂莱诺普利或受体阻滞剂卡维地洛预防早期her2阳性乳腺癌患者接受曲妥珠单抗辅助治疗的心脏毒性的随机社区试验[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):GS5-01。
{"title":"Abstract GS5-01: A randomized community-based trial of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril or a beta blocker, carvedilol for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab","authors":"P. Munster, J. Krischer, R. Tamura, A. Fink, L. Bello-Matricaria, M. Guilin","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS5-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS5-01","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Exposure to trastuzumab for one year is an integral part of therapy for patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Yet, cardiac side effects, particularly in patients who also receive anthracyclines require frequent monitoring and result in dose interruptions and discontinuation of trastuzumab. Prophylactic use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) nhibitors or beta blockers (BB) may prevent cardiotoxicity associated with chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Methods A large community-based prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, evaluated the rates of pre-specified cardiotoxicity in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with one year of trastuzumab. Cardiac events were followed for two years. Patients were randomized to simultaneously receive either the ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, or the BB, carvedilol, or placebo and were further stratified by anthracycline use to determine whether ACE inhibitors or BB can prevent trastuzumab-induced decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and trastuzumab interruptions. Results: The study included 468 eligible patients (median age:51, BMI:27 kg/m 2 , baseline systolic BP: 126mmHg and LVEF :63 ± 6.29%) from 127 community-based practices, 189 patients received an anthracycline. For the entire study population and the non-anthracycline group, no difference in number of trastuzumab interruptions were seen. For patients receiving an anthracycline, cardiac event rates were higher in the placebo group (47%), and reduced in both the lisinopril (37%), and the carvedilol (31%) groups. Interruptions of trastuzumab were required in 23% patients on lisinopril and 20% on carvedilol compared to 40% on placebo (p=0.007). Changes in LVEF from baseline (least square means, SE) were significantly reduced with both carvedilol (-4.5 (0.8), p=0.008, and lisinopril (-4.0 (0.8), p=0.002) than placebo, (-7.7 (0.8). Cardiotoxicity-free survival was longer on both carvedilol (hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence intervals 0.27, 0.89, p=0.009) or lisinopril (HR 0.53, CI 0.30, 0.94, p=0.015). Conclusions In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving trastuzumab and an anthracycline, both lisinopril and carvedilol during treatment reduced cardiotoxicity in patients, but not in those with non-anthracyline containing regimens. The use of lisinopril or carvedilol may allow the use of an anthracycline without compromising trastuzumab treatment in those who might benefit from an anthracycline. Citation Format: Munster P, Krischer J, Tamura R, Fink A, Bello-Matricaria L, Guilin M. A randomized community-based trial of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril or a beta blocker, carvedilol for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstrac","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73629625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract GS3-02: PALLET: A neoadjuvant study to compare the clinical and antiproliferative effects of letrozole with and without palbociclib GS3-02:托盘:一项新辅助研究,比较来曲唑与帕博西尼的临床和抗增殖作用
Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-02
M. Dowsett, S. Jacobs, S. Johnston, J. Bliss, D. Wheatley, Christopher Holcombe, R. Stein, S. McIntosh, P. Barry, D. Dolling, C. Snowdon, S. Perry, Leona M. Batten, A. Dodson, Vera Martins, A. Modi, C. Cornman, S. Puhalla, N. Wolmark, T. Julian, K. Pogue-Geile, A. Robidoux, L. Provencher, J. Boileau, I. Shalaby, M. Thirlwell, K. Fisher, C. H. Bartlett, M. Koehler, K. Osborne, M. Rimawi
Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors, such as palbociclib, are used to treat ER+ metastatic breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy with trials ongoing in patients with primary disease. No biomarkers exist to identify those who do/do not benefit from added CDK4/6 inhibition. PALLET is an investigator-initiated/led phase II randomized trial collaboration between UK and NSABP investigators evaluating the biological and clinical effects of palbociclib with letrozole combination as neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: Postmenopausal women with ER+ primary breast cancer and tumors >2.0cm (ultrasound) were randomized to one of 4 treatment groups (3:2:2:2 ratio): Group A: letrozole (2.5mg/d) for 14 weeks; Group B: letrozole for 2 weeks followed by letrozole + palbociclib to 14 weeks; Group C: palbociclib for 2 weeks followed by letrozole + palbociclib to 14 weeks; Group D: letrozole + palbociclib for 14 weeks. Palbociclib was given 125mg/d PO on a 21 days on, 7 days off schedule. Post-14 week treatment was at the discretion of the treating clinician including letrozole until surgery. Core-cut biopsies were taken at baseline, 2 weeks and 14 weeks. Co-primary endpoints for letrozole alone vs palbociclib groups (Group A vs Groups B+C+D) were: (i) change in Ki67 (IHC) between baseline and 14 weeks (log-fold change, Mann-Whitney test); (ii) clinical response (ultrasound) after 14 weeks (4 group, ordinal, Mann-Whitney test). Complete cell-cycle arrest (CCCA) (Ki67≤2.7%) was analyzed using a logistic regression model adjusting for recruitment region. Pre-specified exploratory biomarkers included c-PARP (apoptosis). Results: 307 patients were recruited between 27 Feb 2015 and 08 Mar 2018; 103 were randomized to letrozole alone and 204 to letrozole + palbociclib. 279 (90.9%) patients were evaluable for 14 week clinical response. Clinical response was not significantly different between letrozole vs letrozole + palbociclib groups [(p=0.20; CR+PR 49.5% (46/93) vs 54.3% (101/186) and PD 5.4% (5/93) vs 3.2% (6/186)] nor was the small proportion of patients with pathological CR (1/87, 1.1% vs 6/180, 3.3%; p=0.43). 190 (61.9%) patients were evaluable for 14 week change in Ki67. The median log-fold change in Ki67 was greater with letrozole + palbociclib vs letrozole alone (-4.1 vs -2.2; p Conclusion: Adding palbociclib to letrozole markedly enhanced the suppression of malignant cell proliferation as assessed by Ki67 but did not substantially increase the clinical response of primary ER+ breast cancer over a 14-week period. Concurrent reductions in cell death may have reduced the speed of tumor shrinkage. Citation Format: Dowsett M, Jacobs S, Johnston S, Bliss J, Wheatley D, Holcombe C, Stein R, McIntosh S, Barry P, Dolling D, Snowdon C, Perry S, Batten L, Dodson A, Martins V, Modi A, Cornman C, Puhalla S, Wolmark N, Julian T, Pogue-Geile K, Robidoux A, Provencher L, Boileau JF, Shalaby I, Thirlwell M, Fisher K, Huang Bartlett C, Koehler M, Osborne K, Rimawi M. PALLET: A
背景:CDK4/6抑制剂,如帕博西尼,被用于治疗ER+转移性乳腺癌联合内分泌治疗,目前正在对原发疾病患者进行试验。目前还没有生物标志物来鉴定那些能/不能从增加的CDK4/6抑制中获益。托盘是一项由英国和NSABP研究者联合发起的II期随机试验,评估帕博西尼与来曲唑联合作为新辅助治疗的生物学和临床效果。方法:绝经后ER+原发性乳腺癌且肿瘤>2.0cm(超声)的妇女随机分为4个治疗组(3:2:2:2):A组:来曲唑(2.5mg/d)治疗14周;B组:来曲唑治疗2周,随后来曲唑+帕博西尼治疗至14周;C组:帕博西尼治疗2周,再用来曲唑+帕博西尼治疗14周;D组:来曲唑+帕博西尼治疗14周。帕博西尼125mg/d,开药21天,停药7天。14周后的治疗由治疗临床医生决定,包括来曲唑直到手术。在基线、第2周和第14周分别进行岩心活检。单独来曲唑组与帕博西尼组(A组与B+C+D组)的共同主要终点是:(i)基线至14周Ki67 (IHC)的变化(对数倍变化,Mann-Whitney检验);(ii) 14周后临床反应(超声)(4组,顺序,Mann-Whitney试验)。完全细胞周期阻滞(Complete cell-cycle arrest, CCCA) (Ki67≤2.7%)采用调整招募区域的logistic回归模型进行分析。预先指定的探索性生物标志物包括c-PARP(细胞凋亡)。结果:在2015年2月27日至2018年3月8日期间招募了307例患者;103例随机分为单独来曲唑组和204例来曲唑+帕博西尼组。279例(90.9%)患者可评估14周临床反应。来曲唑组与来曲唑+帕博西尼组的临床疗效无显著差异[p=0.20;CR+PR 49.5% (46/93) vs 54.3% (101/186), PD 5.4% (5/93) vs 3.2%(6/186)],病理性CR患者比例也不低(1/87,1.1% vs 6/180, 3.3%;p = 0.43)。190例(61.9%)患者可评估14周的Ki67变化。来曲唑+帕博西尼组与单独来曲唑组相比,Ki67的中位对数倍变化更大(-4.1 vs -2.2;结论:根据Ki67的评估,来曲唑中加入帕博西尼可显著增强对恶性细胞增殖的抑制,但在14周的时间内并没有显著增加原发性ER+乳腺癌的临床反应。同时细胞死亡的减少可能降低了肿瘤缩小的速度。引文格式:Dowsett M,雅各布斯年代,约翰斯顿年代,幸福J,惠特利D, Holcombe C,斯坦R,麦金托什,巴里·P,痛单位D,斯诺登峰C,佩里,板条L,道森,马丁斯V,莫迪,Cornman C, Puhalla年代,Wolmark N,朱利安•T Pogue-Geile K, Robidoux, Provencher L,波瓦洛摩根富林明,青年外交官访华团,瑟尔威尔M,费舍尔K,黄Bartlett C,克勒M,奥斯本K, Rimawi M .托盘:新辅助研究比较曲唑的临床和抗增殖效果有无palbociclib[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS3-02。
{"title":"Abstract GS3-02: PALLET: A neoadjuvant study to compare the clinical and antiproliferative effects of letrozole with and without palbociclib","authors":"M. Dowsett, S. Jacobs, S. Johnston, J. Bliss, D. Wheatley, Christopher Holcombe, R. Stein, S. McIntosh, P. Barry, D. Dolling, C. Snowdon, S. Perry, Leona M. Batten, A. Dodson, Vera Martins, A. Modi, C. Cornman, S. Puhalla, N. Wolmark, T. Julian, K. Pogue-Geile, A. Robidoux, L. Provencher, J. Boileau, I. Shalaby, M. Thirlwell, K. Fisher, C. H. Bartlett, M. Koehler, K. Osborne, M. Rimawi","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS3-02","url":null,"abstract":"Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors, such as palbociclib, are used to treat ER+ metastatic breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy with trials ongoing in patients with primary disease. No biomarkers exist to identify those who do/do not benefit from added CDK4/6 inhibition. PALLET is an investigator-initiated/led phase II randomized trial collaboration between UK and NSABP investigators evaluating the biological and clinical effects of palbociclib with letrozole combination as neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: Postmenopausal women with ER+ primary breast cancer and tumors >2.0cm (ultrasound) were randomized to one of 4 treatment groups (3:2:2:2 ratio): Group A: letrozole (2.5mg/d) for 14 weeks; Group B: letrozole for 2 weeks followed by letrozole + palbociclib to 14 weeks; Group C: palbociclib for 2 weeks followed by letrozole + palbociclib to 14 weeks; Group D: letrozole + palbociclib for 14 weeks. Palbociclib was given 125mg/d PO on a 21 days on, 7 days off schedule. Post-14 week treatment was at the discretion of the treating clinician including letrozole until surgery. Core-cut biopsies were taken at baseline, 2 weeks and 14 weeks. Co-primary endpoints for letrozole alone vs palbociclib groups (Group A vs Groups B+C+D) were: (i) change in Ki67 (IHC) between baseline and 14 weeks (log-fold change, Mann-Whitney test); (ii) clinical response (ultrasound) after 14 weeks (4 group, ordinal, Mann-Whitney test). Complete cell-cycle arrest (CCCA) (Ki67≤2.7%) was analyzed using a logistic regression model adjusting for recruitment region. Pre-specified exploratory biomarkers included c-PARP (apoptosis). Results: 307 patients were recruited between 27 Feb 2015 and 08 Mar 2018; 103 were randomized to letrozole alone and 204 to letrozole + palbociclib. 279 (90.9%) patients were evaluable for 14 week clinical response. Clinical response was not significantly different between letrozole vs letrozole + palbociclib groups [(p=0.20; CR+PR 49.5% (46/93) vs 54.3% (101/186) and PD 5.4% (5/93) vs 3.2% (6/186)] nor was the small proportion of patients with pathological CR (1/87, 1.1% vs 6/180, 3.3%; p=0.43). 190 (61.9%) patients were evaluable for 14 week change in Ki67. The median log-fold change in Ki67 was greater with letrozole + palbociclib vs letrozole alone (-4.1 vs -2.2; p Conclusion: Adding palbociclib to letrozole markedly enhanced the suppression of malignant cell proliferation as assessed by Ki67 but did not substantially increase the clinical response of primary ER+ breast cancer over a 14-week period. Concurrent reductions in cell death may have reduced the speed of tumor shrinkage. Citation Format: Dowsett M, Jacobs S, Johnston S, Bliss J, Wheatley D, Holcombe C, Stein R, McIntosh S, Barry P, Dolling D, Snowdon C, Perry S, Batten L, Dodson A, Martins V, Modi A, Cornman C, Puhalla S, Wolmark N, Julian T, Pogue-Geile K, Robidoux A, Provencher L, Boileau JF, Shalaby I, Thirlwell M, Fisher K, Huang Bartlett C, Koehler M, Osborne K, Rimawi M. PALLET: A ","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74670066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract GS2-01: Age-related breast cancer risk estimates for the general population based on sequencing of cancer predisposition genes in 19,228 breast cancer patients and 20,211 matched unaffected controls from US based cohorts in the CARRIERS study GS2-01:基于19228名乳腺癌患者和20211名来自美国携带者研究队列的未受影响对照的癌症易感基因测序,对普通人群的年龄相关乳腺癌风险进行估计
Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS2-01
F. Couch, Chunling Hu, S. Hart, Rohan D Gnanaolivu, J. Lilyquist, Ky Lee, Chi Gao, B. Eckloff, R. Samara, J. Klebba, P. Auer, L. Bernstein, M. Gaudet, C. Haiman, J. Palmer, S. Yao, S. Domchek, J. Weitzel, D. Goldgar, K. Nathanson, P. Kraft, E. Polley
Background: Clinical germline genetic testing of cancer predisposition gene panels is used to identify women at increased risk for breast cancer. The identification of pathogenic mutations in established high and moderate predisposition genes may result in improved risk management of breast cancer for tested patients and their family members through tailored screening, prophylactic surgeries, or chemoprevention. However, the risks of breast cancer associated with mutations in these genes have likely been overestimated for many women in the general population because previous studies have focused on individuals with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, early onset disease, or triple negative breast cancer. The goal of the “CAnceR RIsk Estimates Related to Susceptibility” (CARRIERS) study is to estimate breast cancer risks associated with mutations in hereditary cancer panel genes in the general population. Methods: Germline DNA samples from blood or saliva were obtained from 39,439 breast cancer patients and matched unaffected controls from six US-based cohorts (BWHS, CPSII, CTS, MEC, NHS1, NHS2, WHI). DNA was subjected to dual bar-coded QIAseq multiplex PCR-based amplification of 1733 target regions covering all coding regions of 37 cancer predisposition genes and sequenced. Mutation calling was conducted with Haplotype Caller and Vardict. Results: High quality sequence data was obtained for 38,990 of 39,439 samples (98.9%) and for 99.3% of target regions. Pathogenic mutations in 12 known breast cancer predisposition genes were identified 4.5% of all breast cancer cases and 2.1% of controls; and in 6.7% of African American breast cancer cases and 1.8% of controls. Differences in mutation frequencies were observed by age with mutations in 7.8% of cases diagnosed £50 years of age and 4.0% of cases diagnosed over age 50. Mutations in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 were enriched 2 to 3-fold in cases diagnosed under age 50 relative to older cases. No change in frequency of CHEK2 mutations by age was observed. In case-control analyses mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 were significantly associated with a high risk of breast cancer (odds ratio (OR)>4.0). Of these, BRCA1 and BRCA2 displayed ORs of 13.5 and 16.6 in the £50 age group, but only 5.7 and 3.2 in the >50 age group. Only minor age-specific effects were observed for PALB2. Mutations in ATM and CHEK2 were associated with moderate risks of breast cancer (OR=2.0 to 4.0) in the younger age group, but not in the older age group. Conclusions: Results from the CARRIERS cohort-based study establish that mutations in known breast cancer predisposition genes are associated with only moderate risks of breast cancer in the general population. However, risks are substantially increased for BRCA1 and BRCA2 but not ATM,CHEK2 or PALB2 mutations in those £50 years of age. The age-related estimates of breast cancer risk for each of the hereditary cancer panel genes in this study may inform selection o
背景:临床生殖系基因检测的癌症易感性基因面板是用来确定妇女在乳腺癌的风险增加。确定高易感基因和中等易感基因的致病突变,可能会通过量身定制的筛查、预防性手术或化学预防,改善被检测患者及其家庭成员的乳腺癌风险管理。然而,对于普通人群中的许多女性来说,与这些基因突变相关的乳腺癌风险可能被高估了,因为以前的研究主要集中在有乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌、早发性疾病或三阴性乳腺癌家族史的个体上。“与易感性相关的癌症风险评估”(携带者)研究的目标是评估普通人群中与遗传性癌症面板基因突变相关的乳腺癌风险。方法:从6个美国队列(BWHS, CPSII, CTS, MEC, NHS1, NHS2, WHI)的39,439名乳腺癌患者和匹配的未受影响的对照组中获得血液或唾液的生殖系DNA样本。对DNA进行双条形码QIAseq多重pcr扩增,扩增1733个靶区,覆盖37个癌症易感基因的所有编码区,并测序。用单倍型呼叫者和Vardict进行突变召唤。结果:39,439份样品中有38,990份(98.9%)获得了高质量的序列数据,99.3%的目标区域获得了高质量的序列数据。12个已知乳腺癌易感基因的致病性突变在所有乳腺癌病例中占4.5%,在对照组中占2.1%;6.7%的非裔美国人乳腺癌病例和1.8%的对照组。在50岁以下诊断的病例中,突变频率的差异为7.8%,在50岁以上诊断的病例中,突变率为4.0%。在诊断为50岁以下的病例中,ATM、BRCA1、BRCA2和PALB2突变相对于年龄较大的病例富集了2至3倍。没有观察到CHEK2突变频率随年龄的变化。在病例对照分析中,BRCA1、BRCA2和PALB2基因突变与乳腺癌高风险显著相关(优势比(OR)>4.0)。其中,BRCA1和BRCA2在50岁年龄组的or值分别为13.5和16.6,而在50岁以上年龄组的or值分别为5.7和3.2。PALB2仅观察到轻微的年龄特异性效应。在年轻年龄组中,ATM和CHEK2突变与乳腺癌的中等风险相关(OR=2.0至4.0),但在老年组中没有。结论:基于携带者队列的研究结果表明,在一般人群中,已知乳腺癌易感基因的突变仅与乳腺癌的中等风险相关。然而,在50岁的人群中,BRCA1和BRCA2突变的风险大幅增加,而ATM、CHEK2或PALB2突变的风险则没有增加。本研究中每个遗传性癌症组基因的年龄相关乳腺癌风险估计可能会为一般人群中可能受益于基因检测和相关风险管理策略的个体的选择提供信息。引用格式:Couch FJ, Hu C, Hart SN, gnananolivu RD, Lilyquist J, Lee KY, Gao C, Eckloff B, Samara R, Klebba J, Auer P, Bernstein L, Gaudet M, Haiman C, Palmer JR, Yao S, Domchek SM, Weitzel JN, Goldgar DE, Nathanson KL, Kraft P, Polley等。基于19228名乳腺癌患者和20211名来自美国携带者研究队列的未受影响对照的癌症易感基因测序,对普通人群的年龄相关乳腺癌风险进行估计[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS2-01。
{"title":"Abstract GS2-01: Age-related breast cancer risk estimates for the general population based on sequencing of cancer predisposition genes in 19,228 breast cancer patients and 20,211 matched unaffected controls from US based cohorts in the CARRIERS study","authors":"F. Couch, Chunling Hu, S. Hart, Rohan D Gnanaolivu, J. Lilyquist, Ky Lee, Chi Gao, B. Eckloff, R. Samara, J. Klebba, P. Auer, L. Bernstein, M. Gaudet, C. Haiman, J. Palmer, S. Yao, S. Domchek, J. Weitzel, D. Goldgar, K. Nathanson, P. Kraft, E. Polley","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS2-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS2-01","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical germline genetic testing of cancer predisposition gene panels is used to identify women at increased risk for breast cancer. The identification of pathogenic mutations in established high and moderate predisposition genes may result in improved risk management of breast cancer for tested patients and their family members through tailored screening, prophylactic surgeries, or chemoprevention. However, the risks of breast cancer associated with mutations in these genes have likely been overestimated for many women in the general population because previous studies have focused on individuals with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, early onset disease, or triple negative breast cancer. The goal of the “CAnceR RIsk Estimates Related to Susceptibility” (CARRIERS) study is to estimate breast cancer risks associated with mutations in hereditary cancer panel genes in the general population. Methods: Germline DNA samples from blood or saliva were obtained from 39,439 breast cancer patients and matched unaffected controls from six US-based cohorts (BWHS, CPSII, CTS, MEC, NHS1, NHS2, WHI). DNA was subjected to dual bar-coded QIAseq multiplex PCR-based amplification of 1733 target regions covering all coding regions of 37 cancer predisposition genes and sequenced. Mutation calling was conducted with Haplotype Caller and Vardict. Results: High quality sequence data was obtained for 38,990 of 39,439 samples (98.9%) and for 99.3% of target regions. Pathogenic mutations in 12 known breast cancer predisposition genes were identified 4.5% of all breast cancer cases and 2.1% of controls; and in 6.7% of African American breast cancer cases and 1.8% of controls. Differences in mutation frequencies were observed by age with mutations in 7.8% of cases diagnosed £50 years of age and 4.0% of cases diagnosed over age 50. Mutations in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 were enriched 2 to 3-fold in cases diagnosed under age 50 relative to older cases. No change in frequency of CHEK2 mutations by age was observed. In case-control analyses mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 were significantly associated with a high risk of breast cancer (odds ratio (OR)>4.0). Of these, BRCA1 and BRCA2 displayed ORs of 13.5 and 16.6 in the £50 age group, but only 5.7 and 3.2 in the >50 age group. Only minor age-specific effects were observed for PALB2. Mutations in ATM and CHEK2 were associated with moderate risks of breast cancer (OR=2.0 to 4.0) in the younger age group, but not in the older age group. Conclusions: Results from the CARRIERS cohort-based study establish that mutations in known breast cancer predisposition genes are associated with only moderate risks of breast cancer in the general population. However, risks are substantially increased for BRCA1 and BRCA2 but not ATM,CHEK2 or PALB2 mutations in those £50 years of age. The age-related estimates of breast cancer risk for each of the hereditary cancer panel genes in this study may inform selection o","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"12 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83363181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
期刊
General Session Abstracts
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1