Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.3
Laura Mauldin
This chapter outlines the roots of disability scholarship in sociology and how the sociology of disability subfield positions disability as an axis of inequality. The first part of the chapter argues that sociology is uniquely positioned to understand how disability as a social category is made through institutional structures, larger patterns of exclusion and inclusion, and emphasis on power and inequality. Yet it is often excluded in measurements and analyses in the discipline. The chapter then turns to the origins of disability scholarship in sociology, its influence on the interdisciplinary field of disability studies, and the emergent subfield of sociology of disability within the discipline. The remaining parts of the chapter survey how disability has been studied across subfields such as sociology of health and illness, sociology of body/embodiment, and feminist sociological scholarship. In discussing disability across these subfields, divergences between mainstream sociology and the sociology of disability are highlighted in an effort to map their departures and pinpoint why disability as a category or axis of inequality is persistently underresearched in sociology. The chapter concludes with thoughts about where new scholarship on disability might be going in sociology.
{"title":"Sociological Perspectives on Disability","authors":"Laura Mauldin","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.3","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter outlines the roots of disability scholarship in sociology and how the sociology of disability subfield positions disability as an axis of inequality. The first part of the chapter argues that sociology is uniquely positioned to understand how disability as a social category is made through institutional structures, larger patterns of exclusion and inclusion, and emphasis on power and inequality. Yet it is often excluded in measurements and analyses in the discipline. The chapter then turns to the origins of disability scholarship in sociology, its influence on the interdisciplinary field of disability studies, and the emergent subfield of sociology of disability within the discipline. The remaining parts of the chapter survey how disability has been studied across subfields such as sociology of health and illness, sociology of body/embodiment, and feminist sociological scholarship. In discussing disability across these subfields, divergences between mainstream sociology and the sociology of disability are highlighted in an effort to map their departures and pinpoint why disability as a category or axis of inequality is persistently underresearched in sociology. The chapter concludes with thoughts about where new scholarship on disability might be going in sociology.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133014755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.17
Anthony R. Bardo, Ashley Vowels
This chapter provides a synthesis of the literature on the transition to adulthood among emerging adults with a disability in the United States. The life course paradigm was used to frame the discussion in the context of demographic trends and contemporary circumstances regarding major life transitions in the areas of education, employment, independent living, and sex, marriage, and parenthood. A critical assessment of the current state of the literature from a social versus medical model of disability in these central life domains provides a foundation from which sociologists can explore processes of cumulative inequality embedded in the relatively uncharted lives of transition-age youth with a disability.
{"title":"Disability and the Transition to Adulthood in the United States","authors":"Anthony R. Bardo, Ashley Vowels","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.17","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a synthesis of the literature on the transition to adulthood among emerging adults with a disability in the United States. The life course paradigm was used to frame the discussion in the context of demographic trends and contemporary circumstances regarding major life transitions in the areas of education, employment, independent living, and sex, marriage, and parenthood. A critical assessment of the current state of the literature from a social versus medical model of disability in these central life domains provides a foundation from which sociologists can explore processes of cumulative inequality embedded in the relatively uncharted lives of transition-age youth with a disability.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126091167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.6
K. Latham-Mintus, Sabrina A Cordon
Scholars and advocates have long proposed that an individual’s impairment is not the source of disability, but instead it is social and physical barriers put in place by society that are disabling. The purpose of this chapter is to (1) provide an overview of how contextual factors are conceptualized and measured in the current literature; (2) describe the key findings and discuss what the current research tells us about the salience of the environment for individual disability experiences; and (3) identify critical gaps in the literature and discuss future recommendations. The chapter takes a place-based approach and focuses on the communities and neighborhoods in which people with disabilities live. The chapter also explores how the intersection of disability and other social identities is influenced by the environment. Finally, the chapter concludes by discussing existing gaps in the literature and recommendations for future research.
{"title":"Contextualizing Disability Experiences","authors":"K. Latham-Mintus, Sabrina A Cordon","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.6","url":null,"abstract":"Scholars and advocates have long proposed that an individual’s impairment is not the source of disability, but instead it is social and physical barriers put in place by society that are disabling. The purpose of this chapter is to (1) provide an overview of how contextual factors are conceptualized and measured in the current literature; (2) describe the key findings and discuss what the current research tells us about the salience of the environment for individual disability experiences; and (3) identify critical gaps in the literature and discuss future recommendations. The chapter takes a place-based approach and focuses on the communities and neighborhoods in which people with disabilities live. The chapter also explores how the intersection of disability and other social identities is influenced by the environment. Finally, the chapter concludes by discussing existing gaps in the literature and recommendations for future research.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116250285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.9
S. Grech
The need to focus on disability in the Global South as an academic and practice endeavor has garnered some support in recent years, often backed by frequent references to a disability and poverty relationship, and a consequent need to link disability and international development. Indeed, calls for disability mainstreaming, disability targeting, and emerging discourse on disability-inclusive development (DID) have stepped up, accompanied by policy developments and declarations such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the sustainable development goals (SDGS). Despite these shifts, disability remains marginalized in development research, policy, and programs. Overall, there is a lack of critical discussion on “disability and development,” and difficult questions, including those regarding the implications of development for disabled people, are often forsaken in favor of an approach that seeks to simplify and generalize. The result is that accounts on disability and development are not only partial and fragmented but also neocolonizing. Inspired by critical disability studies and decolonial theory, this chapter reflects critically on some of these concerns, addressing emerging issues that arise when Global North disability discourse and “development” confront complex and dynamic heterogeneous Southern spaces and disability.
{"title":"Critical Thinking on Disability and Development in the Global South","authors":"S. Grech","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.9","url":null,"abstract":"The need to focus on disability in the Global South as an academic and practice endeavor has garnered some support in recent years, often backed by frequent references to a disability and poverty relationship, and a consequent need to link disability and international development. Indeed, calls for disability mainstreaming, disability targeting, and emerging discourse on disability-inclusive development (DID) have stepped up, accompanied by policy developments and declarations such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and the sustainable development goals (SDGS). Despite these shifts, disability remains marginalized in development research, policy, and programs. Overall, there is a lack of critical discussion on “disability and development,” and difficult questions, including those regarding the implications of development for disabled people, are often forsaken in favor of an approach that seeks to simplify and generalize. The result is that accounts on disability and development are not only partial and fragmented but also neocolonizing. Inspired by critical disability studies and decolonial theory, this chapter reflects critically on some of these concerns, addressing emerging issues that arise when Global North disability discourse and “development” confront complex and dynamic heterogeneous Southern spaces and disability.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114349257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.16
M. Elliott, Jordan C. Reuter
This chapter presents the results of an analysis of in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of 45 people who identified as working professionals diagnosed with bipolar disorder or major depression. It explores three dimensions of their experience: disclosure versus concealment of their diagnosis on the job, exposure to discrimination in the workplace based on their mental illness diagnosis, and identity strategies they used to manage the status inconsistency between being a professional and having a mental illness diagnosis. The findings reveal how people learn to calculate when it is safe to disclose their diagnosis on the job, especially after experiencing discriminatory treatment such as being fired or demoted. They also indicate that applying for workplace modifications to accommodate symptoms of mental illness may be met with unprofessional and unsupportive reactions on the part of managers, Human Resources professionals, and coworkers, which could explain in part why so few participants in this sample sought them. When it comes to balancing inconsistent statuses, the findings demonstrate how people distance themselves from their mental illness identity in favor of the more prized status of working professional as a means of self-preservation. The chapter concludes with a call for sweeping changes in workplace culture to minimize fear and shame and maximize inclusion of people diagnosed with mental illness, allowing them to flourish in careers in which they may realize their full potential.
{"title":"Disclosure, Discrimination, and Identity among Working Professionals with Bipolar Disorder or Major Depression","authors":"M. Elliott, Jordan C. Reuter","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.16","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter presents the results of an analysis of in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of 45 people who identified as working professionals diagnosed with bipolar disorder or major depression. It explores three dimensions of their experience: disclosure versus concealment of their diagnosis on the job, exposure to discrimination in the workplace based on their mental illness diagnosis, and identity strategies they used to manage the status inconsistency between being a professional and having a mental illness diagnosis. The findings reveal how people learn to calculate when it is safe to disclose their diagnosis on the job, especially after experiencing discriminatory treatment such as being fired or demoted. They also indicate that applying for workplace modifications to accommodate symptoms of mental illness may be met with unprofessional and unsupportive reactions on the part of managers, Human Resources professionals, and coworkers, which could explain in part why so few participants in this sample sought them. When it comes to balancing inconsistent statuses, the findings demonstrate how people distance themselves from their mental illness identity in favor of the more prized status of working professional as a means of self-preservation. The chapter concludes with a call for sweeping changes in workplace culture to minimize fear and shame and maximize inclusion of people diagnosed with mental illness, allowing them to flourish in careers in which they may realize their full potential.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116674020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.42
Michael B. Prince
This chapter considers the relations between disability and the political in contemporary societies. This includes a discussion of possibilities of human agency and social movement capacities in the disability field. The analysis discusses several models of disability and statuses of bodies, which are evident in theory, movement advocacy, and public policy. These are the personal tragedy and worthy poor model, the biomedical model, the social model, the human rights model, and the psychoemotional model of disability. The chapter then examines activism as a repertoire of activities and roles taking place in various jurisdictional spaces and territorial scales of mobilization. The chapter next analyzes three forms of social injustices and advocacy strategies pursued by contemporary disability rights movements: activism centered on recognition, redistribution, and representation. Concluding observations call on the need to examine disability and the struggle for social justice in relation to a politics of cultural recognition and identity, a politics of socioeconomic redistribution of material goods and services, and a politics of democratic representation that combines conventional and alternative modes of decision-making. Over time, the mix and style of activism may shift at the level of the individual or family, the agency or movement organization, or the national and international sectors. This gives disability activism and the struggle for social justice dynamic qualities enacted through symbolic, materialist, and political concerns in interaction with public and private authorities.
{"title":"Activism, Inclusion, and Social Justice","authors":"Michael B. Prince","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.42","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.42","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the relations between disability and the political in contemporary societies. This includes a discussion of possibilities of human agency and social movement capacities in the disability field. The analysis discusses several models of disability and statuses of bodies, which are evident in theory, movement advocacy, and public policy. These are the personal tragedy and worthy poor model, the biomedical model, the social model, the human rights model, and the psychoemotional model of disability. The chapter then examines activism as a repertoire of activities and roles taking place in various jurisdictional spaces and territorial scales of mobilization. The chapter next analyzes three forms of social injustices and advocacy strategies pursued by contemporary disability rights movements: activism centered on recognition, redistribution, and representation. Concluding observations call on the need to examine disability and the struggle for social justice in relation to a politics of cultural recognition and identity, a politics of socioeconomic redistribution of material goods and services, and a politics of democratic representation that combines conventional and alternative modes of decision-making. Over time, the mix and style of activism may shift at the level of the individual or family, the agency or movement organization, or the national and international sectors. This gives disability activism and the struggle for social justice dynamic qualities enacted through symbolic, materialist, and political concerns in interaction with public and private authorities.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115687017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.14
Kate Prendella, M. Alper
Disabled people have a complex relationship with media as content consumers, activist organizers, and technological innovators. This chapter highlights the underexplored theoretical connections between disability and media sociology and suggests how disability can inform and improve the sociological study of media. The authors draw on various cultural theories and concepts to emphasize how inequalities are perpetuated in disabled individuals’ day-to-day-media encounters. First, the chapter reviews media “access work,” or the paid and voluntary efforts of individuals who labor to make media technologies accessible, and how this work has historically been devalued and rendered invisible. Next, the chapter discusses social media and online communities as powerful resources for generating and sharing knowledge among people with disabilities, while contending with major structural limitations to their participation. Lastly, the chapter explores mass media and the tensions inherent in disability media representation both on- and off-screen. The discussion concludes with suggested areas for future research at the intersections of disability and media sociology that take seriously the mediated work of disabled individuals, employ explicitly anti-ableist approaches, and recognize the need for cultural accessibility.
{"title":"Inequality and Day-to-Day Encounters with Media","authors":"Kate Prendella, M. Alper","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.14","url":null,"abstract":"Disabled people have a complex relationship with media as content consumers, activist organizers, and technological innovators. This chapter highlights the underexplored theoretical connections between disability and media sociology and suggests how disability can inform and improve the sociological study of media. The authors draw on various cultural theories and concepts to emphasize how inequalities are perpetuated in disabled individuals’ day-to-day-media encounters. First, the chapter reviews media “access work,” or the paid and voluntary efforts of individuals who labor to make media technologies accessible, and how this work has historically been devalued and rendered invisible. Next, the chapter discusses social media and online communities as powerful resources for generating and sharing knowledge among people with disabilities, while contending with major structural limitations to their participation. Lastly, the chapter explores mass media and the tensions inherent in disability media representation both on- and off-screen. The discussion concludes with suggested areas for future research at the intersections of disability and media sociology that take seriously the mediated work of disabled individuals, employ explicitly anti-ableist approaches, and recognize the need for cultural accessibility.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115710893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.39
Nomi Ostrander
Nomi Ostrander This chapter explores the intersection of disability, race, and violence within the context of US carceral settings. To foreground this discussion, the author traces the War on Drug’s impact on prison population growth. These policies simultaneously increased community violence that resulted in countless disabilities, along with thousands of deaths. The surviving combatants were often left to serve time in prisons that were not equipped to house and support individuals with disabilities and complex medical needs. Once incarcerated, many people with disabilities experience higher rates of violence and manipulation from other inmates and guards. The chapter concludes with several recommendations to improve conditions for people with disabilities who are incarcerated or face incarceration for criminal offenses.
{"title":"Disability, Violence, and Prison","authors":"Nomi Ostrander","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.39","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.39","url":null,"abstract":"Nomi Ostrander This chapter explores the intersection of disability, race, and violence within the context of US carceral settings. To foreground this discussion, the author traces the War on Drug’s impact on prison population growth. These policies simultaneously increased community violence that resulted in countless disabilities, along with thousands of deaths. The surviving combatants were often left to serve time in prisons that were not equipped to house and support individuals with disabilities and complex medical needs. Once incarcerated, many people with disabilities experience higher rates of violence and manipulation from other inmates and guards. The chapter concludes with several recommendations to improve conditions for people with disabilities who are incarcerated or face incarceration for criminal offenses.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123937055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-10DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.32
Jennifer D. Brooks
Recent work highlights the importance of intersectionality to the study of the economic and labor market inequalities of those with disabilities. Yet, little attention has been given to examining the causes and consequences of these intersectional effects. The current chapter expands on previous research by (1) examining how race/ethnicity, gender, and disability status work in tandem to shape employment probabilities among working-age adults with disabilities and (2) whether potential disparities among these groups can be explained by government assistance receipt. This chapter uses data from the 2017 American Community Survey (ACS) to estimate a series of logistic regression models predicting employment from 16 race-gender-disability groups. Results provide evidence for a “spillover effect” where the disadvantages or advantages an individual acquires from the combination of their status-based characteristics spill over to affect their employment probabilities. This spillover effect may result from the multiplicative effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and disability status on institutions, including employment and government assistance, intertwining to create and maintain hierarchies of disadvantage, leading to overlapping institutions of oppression.
{"title":"An Intersectional Analysis of Labor Market Outcomes","authors":"Jennifer D. Brooks","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.32","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.32","url":null,"abstract":"Recent work highlights the importance of intersectionality to the study of the economic and labor market inequalities of those with disabilities. Yet, little attention has been given to examining the causes and consequences of these intersectional effects. The current chapter expands on previous research by (1) examining how race/ethnicity, gender, and disability status work in tandem to shape employment probabilities among working-age adults with disabilities and (2) whether potential disparities among these groups can be explained by government assistance receipt. This chapter uses data from the 2017 American Community Survey (ACS) to estimate a series of logistic regression models predicting employment from 16 race-gender-disability groups. Results provide evidence for a “spillover effect” where the disadvantages or advantages an individual acquires from the combination of their status-based characteristics spill over to affect their employment probabilities. This spillover effect may result from the multiplicative effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and disability status on institutions, including employment and government assistance, intertwining to create and maintain hierarchies of disadvantage, leading to overlapping institutions of oppression.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129673594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：