Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.07.004
{"title":"Cambio de pauta de intensificación de infliximab en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en remisión mantenida. Reflexiones a propósito de una serie de casos","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 867-868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10144677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.012
{"title":"Malignant transformation in fistula after proctosigmoidectomy: A rare complication of long-standing Crohn's disease","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 871-872"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139685039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.12.007
Fluid resuscitation is an important way in the treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of Lactate Ringer's solution (LR) and Normal Saline (NS) in the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis. Searched in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate), Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, China Wanfang, and China VIP database. All randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were identified. Six studies with 431 patients were included. Compared with NS, LR can significantly reduce the incidence of SIRS at 24h, reduce the length of hospitalization, moderate–severe AP, ICU admission and local complications, especially pancreatic necrosis. It is safe and effective to choose LR for fluid resuscitation in AP, but due to the small number of included studies, multi-center and large-sample RCTs are still needed for further verification.
{"title":"A meta-analysis of Lactate Ringer's solution versus Normal Saline in the treatment of acute pancreatitis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.12.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.12.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span><span>Fluid resuscitation is an important way in the treatment of acute pancreatitis<span> (AP). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of Lactate Ringer's solution (LR) and Normal Saline (NS) in the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis. Searched in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate), Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, China Wanfang, and China </span></span>VIP<span> database. All randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were identified. Six studies with 431 patients were included. Compared with NS, LR<span> can significantly reduce the incidence of SIRS at 24</span></span></span> <span><span>h, reduce the length of hospitalization, moderate–severe AP, ICU admission and local complications, especially pancreatic necrosis. It is safe and effective to choose </span>LR for fluid resuscitation in AP, but due to the small number of included studies, multi-center and large-sample RCTs are still needed for further verification.</span></div><div>PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022322788.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 876-887"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138802828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.02.005
Functional abdominal pain is a disorder in which central and peripheral sensitization processes converge, leading to hypersensitivity and allodynia. Differential diagnosis is made with organic digestive, renal, gynecological, endocrine, or neurological diseases. Treatment should be individualized for each patient. In cases of debilitating pain, therapy combining drugs with different mechanisms of action can be initiated, while in less severe cases, therapy with a progressive introduction of drugs based on clinical response is advised. The first line includes general lifestyle advice and antispasmodic substances, like peppermint oil, anticholinergic/antimuscarinic, and calcium channels antagonists. In the second line of treatment, neuromodulating agents are added. Finally, when these measures fail, third-line treatments such as gabapentine and atypical antipsychotics are considered. Psychological interventions should be considered if specialized therapists are available to manage these disorders.
{"title":"Documento de puesta al día de la Asociación Española de Neurogastroenterología y Motilidad (ASENEM) sobre el manejo del dolor abdominal funcional","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.02.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Functional abdominal pain is a disorder in which central and peripheral sensitization processes converge, leading to hypersensitivity and allodynia. Differential diagnosis is made with organic digestive, renal, gynecological, endocrine, or neurological diseases. Treatment should be individualized for each patient. In cases of debilitating pain, therapy combining drugs with different mechanisms of action can be initiated, while in less severe cases, therapy with a progressive introduction of drugs based on clinical response is advised. The first line includes general lifestyle advice and antispasmodic substances, like peppermint oil, anticholinergic/antimuscarinic, and calcium channels antagonists. In the second line of treatment, neuromodulating agents are added. Finally, when these measures fail, third-line treatments such as gabapentine and atypical antipsychotics are considered. Psychological interventions should be considered if specialized therapists are available to manage these disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 888-900"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140863691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.005
{"title":"Influence of HLA-DQA1*05 on the loss of response to anti-TNF treatment in inflammatory bowel disease. Spanish cohort of real clinical practice","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 869-871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139545874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.09.012
Background
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) incidence and prevalence in Latin America have experienced a significant shift in the last decades. There is paucity of IBD epidemiologic data in Argentina.
Aim
To determine the incidence and prevalence of IBD between 2018 and 2022 of a population from the city of Buenos Aires.
Materials and methods
From January 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2022, the total population of two healthcare insurances were studied. ‘Possible’ IBD cases were identified using the following information sources: IBD-unit patient databases; electronic medical record; central laboratory electronic database; histopathology electronic database; pharmacy electronic database. Age-adjusted incidence and prevalence rates for Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and IBD were estimated based on the number of patients compared with the at-risk population and expressed per 100,000 subjects. Trends in IBD incidence and prevalence were estimated as annual percentage changes; we used Poisson regression modeling to calculate significance in these trends over time.
Results
Information source analysis rendered 172 possible cases, of which 82 cases of IBD were finally confirmed: 27.16% were CD and 72.84% were UC. Mean age-standardized incidence across the study period for IBD, CD and UC was 11.93 (11.28–12.55), 2.88 (2.65–3.07) and 9.05 (8.83–9.2) respectively. Point prevalence on December 31st, 2022 for IBD, UC and CD was 134 (95%CI 132.3–135.6), 98 (96.95–99.52) and 36 (35.69–36.4) respectively.
Conclusions
We found an incidence and prevalence of IBD in a population from Buenos Aires higher than those previously published in epidemiological studies in Argentina.
{"title":"Incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases in a population from Buenos Aires, Argentina","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.09.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.09.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) incidence and prevalence in Latin America have experienced a significant shift in the last decades. There is paucity of IBD epidemiologic data in Argentina.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine the incidence and prevalence of IBD between 2018 and 2022 of a population from the city of Buenos Aires.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>From January 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2022, the total population of two healthcare insurances were studied. ‘Possible’ IBD cases were identified using the following information sources: IBD-unit patient databases; electronic medical record; central laboratory electronic database; histopathology electronic database; pharmacy electronic database. Age-adjusted incidence and prevalence rates for Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and IBD were estimated based on the number of patients compared with the at-risk population and expressed per 100,000 subjects. Trends in IBD incidence and prevalence were estimated as annual percentage changes; we used Poisson regression modeling to calculate significance in these trends over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Information source analysis rendered 172 possible cases, of which 82 cases of IBD were finally confirmed: 27.16% were CD and 72.84% were UC. Mean age-standardized incidence across the study period for IBD, CD and UC was 11.93 (11.28–12.55), 2.88 (2.65–3.07) and 9.05 (8.83–9.2) respectively. Point prevalence on December 31st, 2022 for IBD, UC and CD was 134 (95%CI 132.3–135.6), 98 (96.95–99.52) and 36 (35.69–36.4) respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found an incidence and prevalence of IBD in a population from Buenos Aires higher than those previously published in epidemiological studies in Argentina.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 804-812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41112892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.10.006
Objective
Compare the proportions of use of biological therapy, surgeries, and hospitalizations between adults and pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)—Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)—patients.
Patients and methods
Observational, retrospective, and multicenter study. Data were collected from all consecutive IBD patients seen as outpatients or admitted to hospital, during 2015–2021, in two IBD tertiary centers in a South Brazilian capital. Patients with unclassified colitis diagnosis were excluded from this study. Patients were classified as having CD or UC and sub-categorized as adult or pediatric according to age. Data were analyzed using frequency, proportion, Fisher's exact test, and Chi-square test.
Results
A total of 829 patients were included: 509 with CD (378 adults/131 pediatric) and 320 with UC (225/95). Among patients with CD, no differences were observed for proportions of use of biological therapy (80.2% in pediatric vs. 73.3% in adults; P = 0.129), surgery (46.6% vs. 50.8%; P = 0.419), or hospitalization (64.9% vs. 56.9%; P = 0.122). In UC, significant differences were observed for biological therapy (40.0% vs. 28.0%; P = 0.048) and hospitalization (47.4% vs. 24.0%; P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in surgery rates (17.9% vs. 12.4%; P = 0.219).
Conclusions
Biological therapy and incidence of hospitalization were greater among pediatric patients with UC, compared with adults; no difference was observed in the need for abdominal surgery. In CD, no significant difference was observed in the three main outcomes between the age groups.
{"title":"Biological therapy, surgery, and hospitalization rates for inflammatory bowel disease: An observational Latin American comparative study between adults and pediatric patients","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Compare the proportions of use of biological therapy, surgeries, and hospitalizations between adults and pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)—Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)—patients.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Observational, retrospective, and multicenter study. Data were collected from all consecutive IBD patients seen as outpatients or admitted to hospital, during 2015–2021, in two IBD tertiary centers in a South Brazilian capital. Patients with unclassified colitis diagnosis were excluded from this study. Patients were classified as having CD or UC and sub-categorized as adult or pediatric according to age. Data were analyzed using frequency, proportion, Fisher's exact test, and Chi-square test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 829 patients were included: 509 with CD (378 adults/131 pediatric) and 320 with UC (225/95). Among patients with CD, no differences were observed for proportions of use of biological therapy (80.2% in pediatric vs. 73.3% in adults; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.129), surgery (46.6% vs. 50.8%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.419), or hospitalization (64.9% vs. 56.9%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.122). In UC, significant differences were observed for biological therapy (40.0% vs. 28.0%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.048) and hospitalization (47.4% vs. 24.0%; <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). No significant difference was observed in surgery rates (17.9% vs. 12.4%; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.219).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Biological therapy and incidence of hospitalization were greater among pediatric patients with UC, compared with adults; no difference was observed in the need for abdominal surgery. In CD, no significant difference was observed in the three main outcomes between the age groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 813-820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"61562033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.11.004
Background
The response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination decreases in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, specially under anti-TNF treatment. However, data on medium-term effectiveness are limited, specially using new recommended seroconversion rate (>260 BAU/mL). Our aim was to evaluate the 6-month > 260 BAU-seroconversion rate after full vaccination and after booster-dose.
Methods
VACOVEII is a Spanish multicenter, prospective study promoted by GETECCU. IBD patients full vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and without previous COVID-19 infection, treated or not with immunosuppressants, were included. The booster dose was administered 6 months after the full vaccination. Seroconversion was set at 260 BAU/mL, according to most recent recommendations and was assessed 6 months after the full vaccination and 6 months after booster-dose.
Results
Between October 2021 and March 2022, 313 patients were included (124 no treatment or mesalazine; 55 immunomodulators; 87 anti-TNF; 19 anti-integrin; and 28 ustekinumab). Most patients received mRNA-vaccines (86%). Six months after full vaccination, overall seroconversion rate was 44.1%, being significantly lower among patients on anti-TNF (19.5%, p < 0.001) and ustekinumab (35.7%, p = 0.031). The seroconversion rate after booster was 92%. Again, anti-TNF patients had a significantly lower seroconversion rate (67%, p < 0.001). mRNA-vaccine improved seroconversion rate (OR 11.720 [95% CI 2.26–60.512]).
Conclusion
The full vaccination regimen achieves suboptimal response in IBD patients, specially among those anti-TNF or ustekinumab. The booster dose improves seroconversion rate in all patients, although it remains limited in those treated with anti-TNF. These results reinforce the need to prioritize future booster doses in patients on immunosuppressants therapy, specially under anti-TNF, and using mRNA-vaccines.
{"title":"A booster dose of SARS-COV-2 vaccine improves suboptimal seroconversion rates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Results of a prospective multicenter study of GETECCU (VACOVEII study)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.11.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.11.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination decreases in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, specially under anti-TNF treatment. However, data on medium-term effectiveness are limited, specially using new recommended seroconversion rate (>260<!--> <!-->BAU/mL). Our aim was to evaluate the 6-month<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->260 BAU-seroconversion rate after full vaccination and after booster-dose.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>VACOVEII is a Spanish multicenter, prospective study promoted by GETECCU. IBD patients full vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and without previous COVID-19 infection, treated or not with immunosuppressants, were included. The booster dose was administered 6 months after the full vaccination. Seroconversion was set at 260<!--> <!-->BAU/mL, according to most recent recommendations and was assessed 6 months after the full vaccination and 6 months after booster-dose.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between October 2021 and March 2022, 313 patients were included (124 no treatment or mesalazine; 55 immunomodulators; 87 anti-TNF; 19 anti-integrin; and 28 ustekinumab). Most patients received mRNA-vaccines (86%). Six months after full vaccination, overall seroconversion rate was 44.1%, being significantly lower among patients on anti-TNF (19.5%, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <span>0.001) and ustekinumab (35.7%, </span><em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.031). The seroconversion rate after booster was 92%. Again, anti-TNF patients had a significantly lower seroconversion rate (67%, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). mRNA-vaccine improved seroconversion rate (OR 11.720 [95% CI 2.26–60.512]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The full vaccination regimen achieves suboptimal response in IBD patients, specially among those anti-TNF or ustekinumab. The booster dose improves seroconversion rate in all patients, although it remains limited in those treated with anti-TNF. These results reinforce the need to prioritize future booster doses in patients on immunosuppressants therapy, specially under anti-TNF, and using mRNA-vaccines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 821-833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138440619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}