Herz最新文献

Roemheld syndrome (RS) is a condition that triggers cardiac symptoms due to gastrointestinal compression of the heart. It is often misdiagnosed as other types of cardiac or digestive disorders, leading to unnecessary treatments and reduced quality of life. Here, we provide a thorough review of RS, covering its pathogenesis, etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. We found that a number of conditions, including gallstones, hiatal hernia, excessive gas, and gastroesophageal reflux syndrome, can cause RS. The symptoms of RS can include chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, bloating, and abdominal pain. Clinical history, physical examination, electrocardiograms, and improvement in symptoms following gastrointestinal therapy can all be used to identify RS. We also propose a set of criteria, the IKMAIR criteria, to improve the diagnostic approach for this condition. Dietary changes, lifestyle adjustments, pharmaceutical therapies, and surgical procedures can all be used to control RS. Depending on the underlying etiology and the outcome of treatment, RS has a varying prognosis. We conclude that RS is a complicated and understudied disorder that needs more attention from researchers and patients as well as from medical professionals. We recommend the inclusion of RS in the differential diagnosis for individuals with gastrointestinal problems and unexplained cardiac symptoms. Additionally, we advise treating RS holistically by attending to its cardiac and gastrointestinal components.

The 2024 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) on atrial fibrillation (AF) present current and comprehensive recommendations for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of AF. They are based on the AF-CARE treatment pathway, which includes modification of cardiovascular risk factors, stroke prevention, symptom management and continuous re-evaluation. Accordingly, all patients with newly diagnosed AF should undergo transthoracic echocardiography. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are recommended for the treatment of heart failure across all clinical and echocardiographic levels of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The CHA2DS2-VASc score has been simplified to the CHA2DS2-VA score for the risk assessment of thromboembolism. For rate or rhythm control pharmacotherapy with beta-blockers, digitalis, amiodarone and flecainide are still the most important drugs. Pulmonary vein isolation is now also recommended as a first-line treatment for paroxysmal AF. Re-evaluation of risk factors and treatment of comorbidities is also emphasized. Overall the guidelines represent a further development and update based on recent studies. They remain practical and provide clear and detailed recommendations for action that are globally recognized in the clinical practice.

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and diseases of the aorta published in September 2024 for the first time combine recommendations for both diseases in a joint guideline document. The consolidation of PAD and aorta guidelines follows a holistic approach, which underlines the entirety of the arterial vascular system. This aim is underlined by a specifically introduced recommendation to take the entirety of the circulatory system into account in patients with vascular diseases. The focus in the current ESC guideline document is on a multidisciplinary, patient-centered management of PAD and diseases of the aorta, whereby the prevention and follow-up of patients after therapeutic interventions are emphasized. In PAD the document highlights exercise training and the procedure for patients with chronic wounds as well as risk stratification and hereditary diseases of the aorta.

The 2024 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension introduce the new category "elevated blood pressure" (120-139/70-89 mm Hg). All patients with elevated blood pressure are advised to implement lifestyle modifications. The aim is to reduce the cardiovascular risk at an early stage. In addition, a structured assessment should be carried out based on the comorbidities, such as coronary artery disease, heart failure and stroke as well as on risk factors, which can result from an antihypertensive treatment in cases of moderate to high risk and a blood pressure of 130/80 mm Hg or more despite 3 months of lifestyle modifications. For patients with hypertension (≥ 140/90 mm Hg), the guidelines now recommend initiating lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive medication concurrently. The new target systolic blood pressure is 120-129 mm Hg, with establishment of individualized treatment goals in cases of frailty or age ≥85 years. Compared to the guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the German national guidelines (NVL), the ESC extends the treatment recommendations to patients with elevated blood pressure even below the threshold of 140/90 mm Hg. For resistant hypertension spironolactone is recommended, with renal denervation being an alternative option to increasing the antihypertensive medication.

Background: The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the primary site of embolism in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate the morphological features of the LAA orifice in patients with sinus rhythm, paroxysmal AF, and persistent AF using three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TOE). We also intended to identify morphometric parameters of the LAA orifice that may be potentially associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 106 patients undergoing TOE. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (sinus rhythm), group 2 (persistent AF), and group 3 (paroxysmal AF). All patients underwent a comprehensive evaluation through transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and TOE. Off-line analyses were performed of the recorded images.

Results: The LAA minor orifice area and minimal orifice diameter were greater in patients with persistent AF compared with individuals in sinus rhythm. Patients with persistent AF also had deeper LAAs compared with those in sinus rhythm. None of the LAA orifice morphometric measures were related to ischemic stroke risk. The only independent predictors of ischemic stroke were heart rhythm and the CHA₂DS₂VASc score.

Conclusion: Persistent AF is associated with LAA dilation, increased depth, and larger orifice size. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate LAA orifice structural remodeling in patients with AF using 3D TOE.

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of VO₂ measurements in predicting long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with high cardiovascular risk.

Methods: Based on a 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score, 333 patients with high cardiovascular risk were included in this retrospective analysis. The study endpoint was MACEs, comprising all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, and coronary revascularization. The study cohort was divided into two groups according to the frequency of MACE occurrence. Measurements of VO₂ were assessed for the prediction of MACEs.

Results: The best predictive accuracy for 1‑year MACEs was determined to be a VO₂ max value of ≥ 20.3 mL/kg/min, with 60% specificity and 60% sensitivity (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.71; p < 0.001), and for 5‑year MACEs it was ≥ 19.9 mL/kg/min, with 69% specificity and 64% sensitivity (AUC: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.62-0.76; p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for univariable factors, showed that VO₂ max was independently associated with both short- and long-term MACEs in patients at high cardiovascular risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.900, 95% CI: 0.858-0.943, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: According to the results of this pilot study, VO₂ max can predict both short- and long-term MACEs in patients at high cardiovascular risk.

The 2018 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) provide improved algorithms for the diagnostics and treatment of syncope. New guidelines on ventricular tachycardia, on the prevention of sudden cardiac death and on cardiomyopathies and pacemakers have refined the recommendations. The detailed medical history and examination are crucial for differentiating between cardiac and noncardiac causes and determining the appropriate treatment. High-risk patients need urgent and comprehensive diagnostics. The basic diagnostics include medical history, physical examination and a 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). Further tests, such as long-term ECG monitoring, implantable loop recorders and electrophysiological investigations are helpful in unclear cases. The treatment depends on the cause, with pacemaker implantation and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) being important for cardiac causes, while behavioral measures and medication management have priority for noncardiac syncope.

Background: Percutaneous valve therapies (PVT) are performed on a large number of patients. With increasing procedural volume, the need for follow-up has also increased. Follow-up in the heart valve clinic is endorsed by recent guidelines but utilization is unknown, making resource allocation in the clinic difficult. Central follow-up in valve centers may not be feasible for all patients in the future.

Methods: In our center, follow-up for PVT patients is scheduled at 1 month and 12 months after the index procedure. Patients are reminded of their appointment by invitation letters or phone calls. We analyzed 150 consecutive patients who underwent transcutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and MitraClip implantation (n = 300) at our center.

Results: At 1 month, 72.7% of patients attended their follow-up, while at 12 months the rate dropped to 58%. Patients who underwent TAVI were older than the MitraClip patients (82.7 vs. 76.1 years) but had lower mean logEuroSCORE (22.6% vs. 25.9%). There was no significant difference in 1‑year mortality between TAVI and MitraClip patients (20% vs. 17.3%). By contrast, the rate of missed follow-up visits was higher for TAVI compared to MitraClip patients (52% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.002). Female patients less frequently attended follow-up (p = 0.005), whereas age, EuroSCORE, NYHA class, ejection fraction, and health status (EQ-5DVAS) were not predictors of attendance in multivariable analysis. Although the result of the EQ-5D assessment was not associated with mortality or attendance, completing the questionnaire was associated with overall survival (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In our heart valve clinic, we observed a high percentage of missed follow-up appointments (42% at 12 months) despite a structured follow-up plan. Factors significantly associated with non-attendance in multivariable analysis were female gender and having a TAVI rather than MitraClip. Future follow-up concepts should take such findings into account, and decentralized approaches need to be explored.