首页 > 最新文献

Hematological Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
LISOCABTAGENE MARALEUCEL IN R/R FL (TRANSCEND FL): IMPACT OF PRIOR LINES OF THERAPY, BENDAMUSTINE EXPOSURE, AND DISEASE PROGRESSION ≤ 24 MONTHS OF INITIAL SYSTEMIC THERAPY Lisocabtagene maraleucel在r / r fl (transcend fl)中的作用:既往治疗线、苯达莫司汀暴露和≤24个月初始全身治疗的疾病进展的影响
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/hon.70093_142
S. Ahmed, J. L. Reguera Ortega, F. Morschhauser, G. Cartron, A. P. Rapoport, K. Izutsu, H. Ghesquieres, M. L. Palomba, H. Goto, J. Kuruvilla, J. S. Abramson, P. Borchmann, U. Jäger, M. Kamdar, M. Bar, M. Strocchia, M. Raggi, R. Nishii, A. M. García-Sancho
<p><b>Introduction:</b> In the TRANSCEND FL primary analysis, lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) showed an ORR of 97%, CR rate of 94%, and favorable safety in patients (pts) with second-line (2L) and third-line or later (3L+) R/R FL. In pts with R/R FL, increasing lines of therapy (LOT), progression of disease ≤ 24 mo from initial immunochemotherapy (POD24), and recent exposure to bendamustine (benda) before CAR T cell therapy may impact pt outcomes. We report results in these pt subgroups with R/R FL from TRANSCEND FL.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Pts had 3L+ R/R FL or 2L R/R FL after prior treatment (tx) with an anti-CD20 antibody and alkylator. All pts with 2L R/R FL had PD ≤ 24 mo of diagnosis (dx) and tx ≤ 6 mo of FL dx, and/or modified GELF criteria. Post hoc subgroup analyses were performed by number of prior LOTs (4L+, 3L, 2L), POD24 (yes, no), and benda exposure (< 12 mo, 12–24 mo, or > 24 mo before leukapheresis or no benda). Outcomes included ORR, CR rate, duration of response (DOR), and PFS (all by IRC), OS, time to next tx (TTNT), and safety. In the benda subgroups, cellular kinetics were assessed.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Of 130 liso-cel–treated pts, 59 (45%) received liso-cel as 4L+ tx, 48 (37%) as 3L tx, and 23 (18%) as 2L tx; 73 (56%) had POD24 and 56 (43%) did not; 11 (8%) had prior benda < 12 mo, 11 (8%) within 12–24 mo, 49 (38%) > 24 mo, and 59 (45%) had no benda. Median on-study follow-up was 29.7 mo (range, 0.3–39.6). There were no major differences in demographics or baseline characteristics among subgroups.</p><p>ORR was ≥ 96% across subgroups (Table). CR rate was similar across prior LOTs and POD24 subgroups, but lower in pts with prior benda < 12 mo (75%) versus other benda subgroups (≥ 95%), though pt numbers were small in the < 12-mo group (<i>n</i> = 8). Median DOR was not reached (NR) in all but 4L+ and POD24 subgroups (30.9 mo each); median PFS was NR in all but 4L+, POD24, and no benda subgroups (31.8 mo each); and median OS was NR for all subgroups. A trend toward better 24-mo DOR, PFS, and OS was observed with liso-cel in earlier versus later LOTs. Median DOR, median PFS, and 24-mo DOR, PFS, and OS were slightly better in pts without POD24, though still clinically meaningful in pts with POD24. Rates of 24-mo DOR, PFS, and OS were high for all benda subgroups (≥ 72%) except for the 8 pts with prior benda < 12 mo where a trend for worse outcomes was observed (24-mo PFS, 50%). Median TTNT was NR for all subgroups; 24-mo rates were numerically lower for pts with 4L+ versus 3L and versus 2L FL, POD24 versus no POD24, and prior benda < 12 mo versus other benda subgroups. Cellular kinetics were similar among benda subgroups. Safety was consistent across subgroups with low rates of grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events, and no new signals observed (Table).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> These data support the sustained clinical benefit and manageable safety profile of liso-cel in pts with R
顾问或顾问角色:默沙东、阿斯利康、艾伯维、百时美施贵宝、诺华、养乐多、和和基林、Chugai、百辰辰、Genmab、大冢、小野制药、三菱田部制药、卫材、Symbio、Taked、Zenyakua、Carna Biosciences、Nihon ShinyakuHonoraria:阿斯利康、Abbvie、百时美施贵宝、诺华、辉瑞、杨森、Kyowa Kirin、Daiichi Sankyo、Chugai、Genmab、吉利德、小野制药、Nihon Kayakueutical、Symbio、武田、礼来、安斯泰来、Meiji Seika Pharma其他报酬:研究经费:MSD、AstraZeneca、Abbvie、Incyte、Bristol Myers Squibb、Novartis、Bayer、Pfizer、Janssen、Yakult、Kyowa Kirin、Daiichi Sankyo、Chugai、Beigene、Genmab、LOXO Oncology、Otsuka、Regeneron、giladh。顾问或顾问角色:罗氏,BMS,武田;荣誉:吉利德,罗氏,BMS,艾伯维,武田。L. paloma担任顾问或顾问职务:Synthekine、Kite、Novartis、Bristol Myers SquibbH。薪酬:参与数据安全监测委员会或顾问委员会:Bristol Myers SquibbH。其他报酬:研究经费:赛诺菲、BMS、Gilead、Kyowa Kirin、武田、Meiji、SymbioJ。顾问或顾问角色:BMS、Abbvie、BMS、Gilead、Merck、Roche、Seattle Genetics;OmniaBioHonoraria: BMS、Abbvie、Amgen、Astra Zeneca、Gilead、Incyte、Janssen、Karyopharm、Merck、Novartis、Pfizer、Roche、Seattle genetics .其他报酬:研究经费:BMS、Roche、Astra Zeneca、Merck、Novartis;DSMB: Karyopharm;科学顾问委员会主席:加拿大淋巴瘤协会。顾问或顾问角色:Celgene, Novartis, Abbvie, Kite/Gilead, EMD Serono, MorphoSys, Alimera Sciences, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, C4 Therapeutics, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Bluebird Bio, Kymera, Epizyme, Genmab, MustangBio, Ono Pharmaceutical, Century Therapeutics, Lilly, Caribou Biosciences, Janssen, Takeda, Interius biotheraptics, Cellectar, Seagen, Roche/Genetech, ADC Therapeutics, Foresight diagnostics shonoraria:Regeneron, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Abbvie, Kite/ gilgilead其他报酬:研究经费:Seagen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cellectics, MustangBio, Regeneron, MerckP。顾问或顾问角色:武田肿瘤、BMS、罗氏、米尔天依Biotec、吉利德、MSD、米尔天依Biotec、吉利德、艾伯维、Incyte、百济神州、阿斯利康酬谢:武田肿瘤、BMS、罗氏、MSD其他报酬:补助金或合同:武田肿瘤、MSD、Incyte、米尔天依Biotec;差旅支持:武田肿瘤、罗氏、米天益、吉利德、Incyte、BMSU。JägerConsultant或顾问角色:GILEAD、Roche、GenzymeHonoraria: GILEAD、Roche、Abbvie、BMS、Novartis、milteni其他报酬:参与数据安全监测委员会或顾问委员会:Acerta、Genmab、GenzymeM。顾问或顾问角色:AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Beigene, GenentechOther薪酬:参与数据安全监测委员会或顾问委员会:Celgene, GenentechM。在职或领导职位:Bristol Myers squibbb股票所有权:Bristol Myers SquibbM。施贵宝雇佣或领导职位:Bristol Myers squibbb股票所有权:Bristol Myers SquibbM。任职或领导职务:Bristol Myers squibbb股份:Bristol Myers SquibbR。任职或领导职务:Bristol Myers squibbb股份:Bristol Myers SquibbAM. García-SanchoConsultant或顾问角色:艾伯维、阿斯利康、BMS、Genmab、Gilead/Kite、GSK、Ideogen、Incyte、Janssen、Lilly、Miltenyi、Regeneron、Roche、SobiHonoraria:艾伯维、阿斯利康、百济神州、BMS、Gilead/Kite、Ideogen、Incyte、Janssen、Kyowa麒麟、Lilly、Roche、Sobi、TakedaOther薪酬:差旅支持:Roche、Abbvie、Gilead/Kite、BMS、Lilly;DSMB: AstraZeneca, BMS, Regeneron;领导或受托人在其他董事会,社会,委员会或倡导团体,有偿或无偿:GELTAMO基金会
{"title":"LISOCABTAGENE MARALEUCEL IN R/R FL (TRANSCEND FL): IMPACT OF PRIOR LINES OF THERAPY, BENDAMUSTINE EXPOSURE, AND DISEASE PROGRESSION ≤ 24 MONTHS OF INITIAL SYSTEMIC THERAPY","authors":"S. Ahmed,&nbsp;J. L. Reguera Ortega,&nbsp;F. Morschhauser,&nbsp;G. Cartron,&nbsp;A. P. Rapoport,&nbsp;K. Izutsu,&nbsp;H. Ghesquieres,&nbsp;M. L. Palomba,&nbsp;H. Goto,&nbsp;J. Kuruvilla,&nbsp;J. S. Abramson,&nbsp;P. Borchmann,&nbsp;U. Jäger,&nbsp;M. Kamdar,&nbsp;M. Bar,&nbsp;M. Strocchia,&nbsp;M. Raggi,&nbsp;R. Nishii,&nbsp;A. M. García-Sancho","doi":"10.1002/hon.70093_142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70093_142","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; In the TRANSCEND FL primary analysis, lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) showed an ORR of 97%, CR rate of 94%, and favorable safety in patients (pts) with second-line (2L) and third-line or later (3L+) R/R FL. In pts with R/R FL, increasing lines of therapy (LOT), progression of disease ≤ 24 mo from initial immunochemotherapy (POD24), and recent exposure to bendamustine (benda) before CAR T cell therapy may impact pt outcomes. We report results in these pt subgroups with R/R FL from TRANSCEND FL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; Pts had 3L+ R/R FL or 2L R/R FL after prior treatment (tx) with an anti-CD20 antibody and alkylator. All pts with 2L R/R FL had PD ≤ 24 mo of diagnosis (dx) and tx ≤ 6 mo of FL dx, and/or modified GELF criteria. Post hoc subgroup analyses were performed by number of prior LOTs (4L+, 3L, 2L), POD24 (yes, no), and benda exposure (&lt; 12 mo, 12–24 mo, or &gt; 24 mo before leukapheresis or no benda). Outcomes included ORR, CR rate, duration of response (DOR), and PFS (all by IRC), OS, time to next tx (TTNT), and safety. In the benda subgroups, cellular kinetics were assessed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Of 130 liso-cel–treated pts, 59 (45%) received liso-cel as 4L+ tx, 48 (37%) as 3L tx, and 23 (18%) as 2L tx; 73 (56%) had POD24 and 56 (43%) did not; 11 (8%) had prior benda &lt; 12 mo, 11 (8%) within 12–24 mo, 49 (38%) &gt; 24 mo, and 59 (45%) had no benda. Median on-study follow-up was 29.7 mo (range, 0.3–39.6). There were no major differences in demographics or baseline characteristics among subgroups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ORR was ≥ 96% across subgroups (Table). CR rate was similar across prior LOTs and POD24 subgroups, but lower in pts with prior benda &lt; 12 mo (75%) versus other benda subgroups (≥ 95%), though pt numbers were small in the &lt; 12-mo group (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 8). Median DOR was not reached (NR) in all but 4L+ and POD24 subgroups (30.9 mo each); median PFS was NR in all but 4L+, POD24, and no benda subgroups (31.8 mo each); and median OS was NR for all subgroups. A trend toward better 24-mo DOR, PFS, and OS was observed with liso-cel in earlier versus later LOTs. Median DOR, median PFS, and 24-mo DOR, PFS, and OS were slightly better in pts without POD24, though still clinically meaningful in pts with POD24. Rates of 24-mo DOR, PFS, and OS were high for all benda subgroups (≥ 72%) except for the 8 pts with prior benda &lt; 12 mo where a trend for worse outcomes was observed (24-mo PFS, 50%). Median TTNT was NR for all subgroups; 24-mo rates were numerically lower for pts with 4L+ versus 3L and versus 2L FL, POD24 versus no POD24, and prior benda &lt; 12 mo versus other benda subgroups. Cellular kinetics were similar among benda subgroups. Safety was consistent across subgroups with low rates of grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events, and no new signals observed (Table).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; These data support the sustained clinical benefit and manageable safety profile of liso-cel in pts with R","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_142","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA EPIDEMIOLOGY AND OUTCOMES IN ENGLAND 2014–2021: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS FROM THE UNCOVER STUDY GROUP 2014-2021年英国滤泡性淋巴瘤流行病学和结局:来自reveal研究组的初步分析
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/hon.70093_96
K. M. Linton, I. Karpha, Y. Lim, M. Bishton, L. Jeffers, T. Erinfolami, N. Akter, H. Liu, B. Johnston, N. Kalakonda, C. Tudur Smith, M. Clancy, A. Pettitt

Introduction: UNCOVER is a blood cancer health data research programme that utilises the National Cancer Registration Dataset (NCRD). NCRD includes information on all patients diagnosed with all types of cancer in all NHS institutions in England (Int J Epidemiol 2020; 49(1):16–16h).

Methods: NCRD data was obtained for all patients in England diagnosed with any type of blood cancer between Jan 2014 and Dec 2021. Patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL) were identified using ICD-O-3 codes 96953, 96913, 96983, and 96903. Crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated and compared between groups using multivariable Poisson regression, and calendar time trends were assessed. Overall survival (OS), cause-specific and relative survival was assessed using K-M methods and multivariable Cox regression, Fine-Gray and Pohar-Perme models, respectively. All models were adjusted for age, gender, index of multiple deprivation (IMD) quintile and government region, while Cox and Fine-Gray models were also adjusted for ethnicity and Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI).

Results: 17561 patients with FL aged 18–99 were identified (demographics in Table 1). Gender (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), ethnicity (p < 0.001), region (p < 0.001) and year of diagnosis (p < 0.001) were independently associated with incidence. The adjusted IRR increased with age and was lower in females (0.90), in mixed-race (0.20), Asian (0.43) and black (0.28) people compared to white people, and in all 8 provincial regions compared to London (IRR for North West 0.81). The adjusted IRR for successive calendar years was generally stable but dipped in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic [2020 vs. 2014; 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89–1.01)]. Survival data were available until July 2023 [median follow-up 4.4 years (IQR: 2.4–6.6)]. 4709 (26.8%) patients died, with 5-year OS 74% (95% CI: 74%–75%) and relative survival 85% (84%–86%). Gender (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), ethnicity (p = 0.044), CCI (p < 0.001), IMD (p < 0.001) and year of diagnosis (p = 0.008) were independently associated with OS. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) increased with age [15.4 (95% CI: 11.6–20.6) for 75–99 vs. 18–44], deprivation [1.47 (1.33–1.61) for IMD1 vs. IMD5] and comorbidity [2.35 (2.09–2.64) for CCI ≥ 4 vs. 0] but was lower in females [0.78 (0.73–0.82)], in black versus white people [0.60 (0.38–0.93)], and in patients diagnosed in 2015 versus 2014 [0.86 (0.78–0.96)].

Conclusion: Our findings shed new light on FL epidemiology and outcomes in England during the period 2014–2021. Even when other variables such as age and comorbidity were taken into account, reported incidence was lower and survival shorter in people living in more deprived areas, identifying a group with significant unmet needs. A significant proportion of patients died of unrelated

简介:揭开是一个血癌健康数据研究计划,利用国家癌症登记数据集(NCRD)。NCRD包括在英格兰所有NHS机构中被诊断患有所有类型癌症的所有患者的信息(国际流行病学杂志2020;49 (1): 16-16h)。方法:获取2014年1月至2021年12月期间英国诊断为任何类型血癌的所有患者的NCRD数据。新诊断滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)的患者使用ICD-O-3代码96953、96913、96983和96903进行鉴定。使用多变量泊松回归估计和比较两组间的粗发病率比和校正发病率比,并评估日历时间趋势。分别采用K-M方法和多变量Cox回归、Fine-Gray和Pohar-Perme模型评估总生存期(OS)、病因特异性和相对生存期。所有模型都根据年龄、性别、多重剥夺指数(IMD)五分位数和政府区域进行了调整,而Cox和Fine-Gray模型也根据种族和Charlson共发病指数(CCI)进行了调整。结果:17561例18-99岁的FL患者被确定(人口统计数据见表1)。性别(p <;0.001),年龄(p <;0.001),种族(p <;0.001),区域(p <;0.001)和诊断年份(p <;0.001)与发病率独立相关。调整后的IRR随着年龄的增长而增加,与白人相比,女性(0.90)、混血儿(0.20)、亚洲人(0.43)和黑人(0.28)的IRR较低,与伦敦相比,所有8个省级地区的IRR均较低(西北地区的IRR为0.81)。连续历年的调整后内部收益率总体稳定,但在2019冠状病毒病大流行的第一年有所下降[2020年与2014年;0.94 (95% ci: 0.89-1.01)]。截止到2023年7月的生存数据[中位随访4.4年(IQR: 2.4-6.6)]。4709例(26.8%)患者死亡,5年OS为74% (95% CI: 74% - 75%),相对生存率为85%(84%-86%)。性别(p <;0.001),年龄(p <;0.001),种族(p = 0.044), CCI (p <;0.001), IMD (p <;0.001)和诊断年份(p = 0.008)与OS独立相关。校正后的危险比(HR)随年龄增加[75-99 vs. 18-44为15.4 (95% CI: 11.6-20.6)], IMD1 vs. IMD5为剥夺[1.47 (1.33-1.61)],CCI≥4为合并症[2.35(2.09-2.64)],但女性[0.78(0.73-0.82)],黑人与白人[0.60(0.38-0.93)],2015年诊断的患者与2014年诊断的患者[0.86(0.78 - 0.96)]较低。结论:我们的研究结果为2014-2021年期间英格兰FL的流行病学和结局提供了新的视角。即使考虑到年龄和合并症等其他变量,生活在更贫困地区的人报告的发病率更低,生存时间更短,确定了一个显著未满足需求的群体。相当比例的患者死于不相关的原因,这强调了在选择治疗时平衡疗效、毒性和生活质量的重要性,特别是对老年患者和有合并症的患者。研究经费声明:本研究由英国血癌协会、西北癌症研究所、克拉特布里奇癌症中心NHS基金会信托基金、利物浦大学人口健康研究所和马恩岛抗癌协会资助。关键词:其他;癌症健康差距;潜在的利益冲突来源:K。顾问或顾问角色:罗氏、艾伯维、Genmab、Nurix Therapeutics、BMSHonoraria:艾伯维、百辰、Nurix Therapeutics资助:艾伯维、Genmab其他报酬:研究资金-罗氏、Genmab、百辰、Nurix Therapeutics、Byondis、StepPharma、AstraZenecaM。顾问或顾问角色:Incyte、Roche、Lilly、AbbVieHonoraria: Roche、武田、Celltrion、Kite/Gilead、Lilly、Abbvie、recordation其他报酬:研究经费:Roche、武田、GenmabA。其他报酬:研究经费:阿斯利康,Celgene/BMS,罗氏
{"title":"FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA EPIDEMIOLOGY AND OUTCOMES IN ENGLAND 2014–2021: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS FROM THE UNCOVER STUDY GROUP","authors":"K. M. Linton,&nbsp;I. Karpha,&nbsp;Y. Lim,&nbsp;M. Bishton,&nbsp;L. Jeffers,&nbsp;T. Erinfolami,&nbsp;N. Akter,&nbsp;H. Liu,&nbsp;B. Johnston,&nbsp;N. Kalakonda,&nbsp;C. Tudur Smith,&nbsp;M. Clancy,&nbsp;A. Pettitt","doi":"10.1002/hon.70093_96","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70093_96","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Introduction</b>: UNCOVER is a blood cancer health data research programme that utilises the National Cancer Registration Dataset (NCRD). NCRD includes information on all patients diagnosed with all types of cancer in all NHS institutions in England (<i>Int J Epidemiol</i> 2020; 49(1):16–16h).</p><p><b>Methods</b>: NCRD data was obtained for all patients in England diagnosed with any type of blood cancer between Jan 2014 and Dec 2021. Patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL) were identified using ICD-O-3 codes 96953, 96913, 96983, and 96903. Crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated and compared between groups using multivariable Poisson regression, and calendar time trends were assessed. Overall survival (OS), cause-specific and relative survival was assessed using K-M methods and multivariable Cox regression, Fine-Gray and Pohar-Perme models, respectively. All models were adjusted for age, gender, index of multiple deprivation (IMD) quintile and government region, while Cox and Fine-Gray models were also adjusted for ethnicity and Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI).</p><p><b>Results</b>: 17561 patients with FL aged 18–99 were identified (demographics in Table 1). Gender (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), age (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), ethnicity (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), region (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and year of diagnosis (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were independently associated with incidence. The adjusted IRR increased with age and was lower in females (0.90), in mixed-race (0.20), Asian (0.43) and black (0.28) people compared to white people, and in all 8 provincial regions compared to London (IRR for North West 0.81). The adjusted IRR for successive calendar years was generally stable but dipped in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic [2020 vs. 2014; 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89–1.01)]. Survival data were available until July 2023 [median follow-up 4.4 years (IQR: 2.4–6.6)]. 4709 (26.8%) patients died, with 5-year OS 74% (95% CI: 74%–75%) and relative survival 85% (84%–86%). Gender (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), age (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), ethnicity (<i>p</i> = 0.044), CCI (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), IMD (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and year of diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.008) were independently associated with OS. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) increased with age [15.4 (95% CI: 11.6–20.6) for 75–99 vs. 18–44], deprivation [1.47 (1.33–1.61) for IMD1 vs. IMD5] and comorbidity [2.35 (2.09–2.64) for CCI ≥ 4 vs. 0] but was lower in females [0.78 (0.73–0.82)], in black versus white people [0.60 (0.38–0.93)], and in patients diagnosed in 2015 versus 2014 [0.86 (0.78–0.96)].</p><p><b>Conclusion</b>: Our findings shed new light on FL epidemiology and outcomes in England during the period 2014–2021. Even when other variables such as age and comorbidity were taken into account, reported incidence was lower and survival shorter in people living in more deprived areas, identifying a group with significant unmet needs. A significant proportion of patients died of unrelated","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_96","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A MULTI-CENTER, PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PD-1 ANTIBODY SINTILIMAB IN COMBINATION WITH PEGASPARGASE AND ANLOTINIB IN STAGE IV NKTCL PATIENTS pd-1抗体sintilimab联合pegaspargase和anlotinib治疗iv期NKTCL患者的疗效和安全性的多中心前瞻性研究
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/hon.70094_400
R. Tao, C. Liu, W. Zhang, J. Wan, Y. Ma, Y. Zhu, L. Ma, S. Tian, H. Ding
<p><b>Introduction:</b> Stage IV Natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) has a poor prognosis. Asparaginase is the backbone drug for the treatment of NKTCL. Anti-PD-1 antibody is effective for relapsed/refractory NKTCL. Our previous study found that angiogenesis inhibitor anlotinib was active in relapsed/refractory NKTCL. This study is aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Sintilimab, a PD-1 antibody approved in China, in combination with Pegaspargase and anlotinib (LEAP regimen) in the treatment of stage IV NKTCL patients unfit for high-dose induction chemotherapy.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Eligible patients met the following criteria: (1) Histologically confirmed NKTCL with stage IV classification per Lugano 2014 criteria; (2) Age > 65 years or ≤ 65 years with protocol-defined contraindications to high-dose methotrexate/dexamethasone. The LEAP regimen comprised 3-week cycles (maximum 8 cycles): Sintilimab 200 mg IV day 1; Pegaspargase 2500 IU/m<sup>2</sup> IM day 1; Anlotinib 8 mg PO days 1–14. Complete responders could receive consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) at investigator discretion. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at 24 weeks by Lugano 2014 criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety analysis using CTCAE v4.0.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Thirty-seven patients were enrolled (median age 64 years; range 32–78; M:F = 22:15) from July 2019 to April 2021. The median treatment duration was 8 cycles (range 2–8), with 72.9% (27/37) achieving CR and an objective response rate of 83.8% (31/37). Disease progression occurred in 16.2% (6/37) during treatment. Following induction therapy, 63.0% (17/27) of CR patients underwent consolidative auto-HSCT versus 37.0% (10/27) who entered observation. With a median follow-up of 48 months (95% CI: 45.2–50.8), the auto-HSCT cohort demonstrated significantly lower relapse rates (17.6% vs. 60.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Survival outcomes revealed 1-/4-year PFS rates of 78.4% (95% CI: 61.4%–88.6%)/56.6% (39.2%–70.7%) and 1-/4-year OS rates of 83.8% (67.4%–92.4%)/75.2% (57.7%–86.3%). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs), predominantly grade 1–2 asparaginase-associated toxicities). Grade ≥ 3 AEs included neutropenia (10.8%) and hyperbilirubinemia (10.8%). No AE-related treatment discontinuations occurred.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The LEAP regimen demonstrates robust clinical efficacy (CR rate 72.9%) and favorable tolerability in high-risk stage IV NKTCL patients ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy. However, the high post-remission relapse rate (60%) in non-consolidated patients underscores the necessity for effective maintenance strategies. Our findings suggest consolidative auto-HSCT significantly improves disease free survival, potentially bridging the gap between immunotherapy and durable remission in this challenging patient population.</p><p><b>Keyw
IV期自然杀伤/ t细胞淋巴瘤(NKTCL)预后较差。天冬酰胺酶是治疗NKTCL的骨干药物。抗pd -1抗体对复发/难治性NKTCL有效。我们之前的研究发现血管生成抑制剂anlotinib在复发/难治性NKTCL中有活性。本研究旨在探讨中国已获批的PD-1抗体Sintilimab联合Pegaspargase和anlotinib (LEAP方案)治疗不适合大剂量诱导化疗的ⅳ期NKTCL患者的疗效和安全性。方法:符合以下标准的患者:(1)根据Lugano 2014标准,组织学证实为NKTCL,分期为IV期;(2)年龄;65岁或≤65岁,有方案规定的大剂量甲氨蝶呤/地塞米松禁忌症。LEAP方案包括3周周期(最多8个周期):辛替单抗200mg IV第1天;Pegaspargase 2500 IU/m2 IM第1天;安洛替尼8mg PO天1-14。完全应答者可以接受巩固性自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HSCT)。根据Lugano 2014标准,主要终点是24周的完全缓解(CR)率。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和使用CTCAE v4.0进行的安全性分析。结果:37例患者入组(中位年龄64岁;32 - 78;M:F = 22:15)从2019年7月到2021年4月。中位治疗持续时间为8个周期(范围2-8),72.9%(27/37)达到CR,客观缓解率为83.8%(31/37)。16.2%(6/37)的患者在治疗期间出现疾病进展。诱导治疗后,63.0%(17/27)的CR患者接受了巩固性自体造血干细胞移植,而进入观察期的患者为37.0%(10/27)。中位随访时间为48个月(95% CI: 45.2-50.8), auto-HSCT队列显示复发率显著降低(17.6% vs. 60.0%, p <;0.05)。生存结果显示1- 4年PFS率为78.4% (95% CI: 61.4%-88.6%)/56.6%(39.2%-70.7%), 1- 4年OS率为83.8%(67.4%-92.4%)/75.2%(57.7%-86.3%)。所有患者均出现治疗相关不良事件(ae),主要是1-2级天冬酰胺酶相关毒性。≥3级ae包括中性粒细胞减少症(10.8%)和高胆红素血症(10.8%)。没有发生与ae相关的治疗中断。结论:LEAP方案在不适合强化诱导化疗的高危IV期NKTCL患者中具有良好的临床疗效(CR率为72.9%)和耐受性。然而,非巩固患者的高缓解后复发率(60%)强调了有效维持策略的必要性。我们的研究结果表明,在这一具有挑战性的患者群体中,巩固性自体造血干细胞移植显着提高了无病生存率,可能弥合了免疫治疗和持久缓解之间的差距。关键词:侵袭性t细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤;联合疗法;没有潜在的利益冲突来源。
{"title":"A MULTI-CENTER, PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PD-1 ANTIBODY SINTILIMAB IN COMBINATION WITH PEGASPARGASE AND ANLOTINIB IN STAGE IV NKTCL PATIENTS","authors":"R. Tao,&nbsp;C. Liu,&nbsp;W. Zhang,&nbsp;J. Wan,&nbsp;Y. Ma,&nbsp;Y. Zhu,&nbsp;L. Ma,&nbsp;S. Tian,&nbsp;H. Ding","doi":"10.1002/hon.70094_400","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70094_400","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Stage IV Natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) has a poor prognosis. Asparaginase is the backbone drug for the treatment of NKTCL. Anti-PD-1 antibody is effective for relapsed/refractory NKTCL. Our previous study found that angiogenesis inhibitor anlotinib was active in relapsed/refractory NKTCL. This study is aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Sintilimab, a PD-1 antibody approved in China, in combination with Pegaspargase and anlotinib (LEAP regimen) in the treatment of stage IV NKTCL patients unfit for high-dose induction chemotherapy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; Eligible patients met the following criteria: (1) Histologically confirmed NKTCL with stage IV classification per Lugano 2014 criteria; (2) Age &gt; 65 years or ≤ 65 years with protocol-defined contraindications to high-dose methotrexate/dexamethasone. The LEAP regimen comprised 3-week cycles (maximum 8 cycles): Sintilimab 200 mg IV day 1; Pegaspargase 2500 IU/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; IM day 1; Anlotinib 8 mg PO days 1–14. Complete responders could receive consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) at investigator discretion. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at 24 weeks by Lugano 2014 criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety analysis using CTCAE v4.0.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Thirty-seven patients were enrolled (median age 64 years; range 32–78; M:F = 22:15) from July 2019 to April 2021. The median treatment duration was 8 cycles (range 2–8), with 72.9% (27/37) achieving CR and an objective response rate of 83.8% (31/37). Disease progression occurred in 16.2% (6/37) during treatment. Following induction therapy, 63.0% (17/27) of CR patients underwent consolidative auto-HSCT versus 37.0% (10/27) who entered observation. With a median follow-up of 48 months (95% CI: 45.2–50.8), the auto-HSCT cohort demonstrated significantly lower relapse rates (17.6% vs. 60.0%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.05). Survival outcomes revealed 1-/4-year PFS rates of 78.4% (95% CI: 61.4%–88.6%)/56.6% (39.2%–70.7%) and 1-/4-year OS rates of 83.8% (67.4%–92.4%)/75.2% (57.7%–86.3%). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs), predominantly grade 1–2 asparaginase-associated toxicities). Grade ≥ 3 AEs included neutropenia (10.8%) and hyperbilirubinemia (10.8%). No AE-related treatment discontinuations occurred.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; The LEAP regimen demonstrates robust clinical efficacy (CR rate 72.9%) and favorable tolerability in high-risk stage IV NKTCL patients ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy. However, the high post-remission relapse rate (60%) in non-consolidated patients underscores the necessity for effective maintenance strategies. Our findings suggest consolidative auto-HSCT significantly improves disease free survival, potentially bridging the gap between immunotherapy and durable remission in this challenging patient population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Keyw","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70094_400","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MATURE B-NHL IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS 儿童和青少年复发/难治性成熟b-nhl
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/hon.70093_31
A. Burke

Relapsed and refractory (r/r) mature B-NHL in chidlren and adolescents represents an area of unmet cinical need due to the poor prognosis of these patients. Burkitt lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma are the majority histologies.

Mulitple new immuno-oncology therapies are available or being investigated in adult r/r mature B-NHL. The rarity of childhod and adolescent disease makes evaluation of all of these impossible and a more strategic approach is required.

This lecture will explore the challenges of rational new drug development in this rare disease and highlight the current landscape with an emphasis on an international, transatlantic, academic-industry collaborative, fit-for-filing trial -Glo-BNHL (NCT05991388)

Research funding declaration: CRUK, FKC, Multiple industry partners.

Keywords: non-Hodgkin (Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult); immunotherapy; ongoing trials

Potential sources of conflict of interest:

A. Burke

Other remuneration: Institutional funding from Regeneron, ADCT Therapeutics and BMS for clinical trial

儿童和青少年中复发和难治性(r/r)成熟B-NHL由于这些患者预后不良,代表了一个未满足临床需求的领域。伯基特淋巴瘤和弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤是主要的组织学类型。多种新的免疫肿瘤治疗方法可用于或正在研究成人或成熟B-NHL。由于儿童和青少年疾病罕见,因此不可能对所有这些疾病进行评估,因此需要采取更具战略性的办法。本讲座将探讨这种罕见疾病的合理新药开发面临的挑战,并强调当前的形势,重点是国际,跨大西洋,学术-行业合作,适合申请的试验- glol - bnhl (NCT05991388)研究经费声明:CRUK, FKC,多个行业合作伙伴。关键词:非霍奇金(儿童、青少年、青年);免疫治疗;正在进行的试验潜在的利益冲突来源:其他报酬:来自Regeneron, ADCT Therapeutics和BMS的临床试验机构资助
{"title":"RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MATURE B-NHL IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS","authors":"A. Burke","doi":"10.1002/hon.70093_31","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70093_31","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Relapsed and refractory (r/r) mature B-NHL in chidlren and adolescents represents an area of unmet cinical need due to the poor prognosis of these patients. Burkitt lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma are the majority histologies.</p><p>Mulitple new immuno-oncology therapies are available or being investigated in adult r/r mature B-NHL. The rarity of childhod and adolescent disease makes evaluation of all of these impossible and a more strategic approach is required.</p><p>This lecture will explore the challenges of rational new drug development in this rare disease and highlight the current landscape with an emphasis on an international, transatlantic, academic-industry collaborative, fit-for-filing trial -Glo-BNHL (NCT05991388)</p><p><b>Research</b> <b>funding declaration:</b> CRUK, FKC, Multiple industry partners.</p><p><b>Keywords:</b> non-Hodgkin (Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult); immunotherapy; ongoing trials</p><p><b>Potential sources of conflict of interest:</b></p><p><b>A. Burke</b></p><p><b>Other remuneration:</b> Institutional funding from Regeneron, ADCT Therapeutics and BMS for clinical trial</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_31","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
RITUXIMAB-DOSE-ADJUSTED EPOCH VERSUS RITUXIMAB-CHOP IN PRIMARY MEDIASTINAL LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA 利妥昔单抗剂量调整起始期与利妥昔单抗治疗原发性纵隔大b细胞淋巴瘤
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/hon.70094_346
T. Vassilakopoulos, Z. Mellios, G. Papageorgiou, A. Piperidou, E. Verigou, C. Chatzidimitriou, C. Kalpadakis, E. Katodritou, H. Giatra, V. Xanthopoulos, G. Gainaru, E. Vrakidou, T. Leonidopoulou, M. Kotsopoulou, M. Palassopoulou, S. Karakatsanis, M. Tsirogianni, E. Hatzimichael, E. Terpos, P. Zikos, C. Poziopoulos, E. Vervessou, M. Arapaki, A. Kopsaftopoulou, A. Liaskas, P. Katsaouni, J. Assimakopoulos, G. Kourti, D. Koutsiafes, M. Siakantaris, G. Karianakis, A. Symeonidis, D. Grentzelias, V. Pappa, P. Tsirigotis, E. Papadaki, E. Plata, M. Bakiri, G. Pangalis, M. Angelopoulou, M. Bouzani
<p><b>Background:</b> Further to the impressive phase 2 NCI results, retrospective comparisons have shown a modest, non-significant benefit in disease control and a reduced need for consolidative radiotherapy (RT) with R-da-EPOCH versus R-CHOP in PMLBCL. However, the numbers of patients were small-to-moderate (<< 100) and the choice of treatment was at the discretion of the treating physician, inevitably introducing systematic bias.</p><p><b>Aims:</b> To evaluate the efficacy of R-da-EPOCH versus R-CHOP with an -as much as possible- unbiased selection of control group patients</p><p><b>Methods:</b> R-da-EPOCH was adopted in all consecutive patients with PMLBCL ≤ 65 years (<i>n</i> = 156) in 18 participating Centers, which were providing R-CHOP as standard of care until that time. The control group of R-CHOP-treated patients was devised from the same Centers’ database, selecting in chronological order (most recent first) an equal number of consecutive patients to those treated with R-da-EPOCH at the same Center, if possible, thus minimizing selection bias. Due to lack of some appropriate controls in a few Centers (< 20 R-CHOP-treated patients less), they were substituted by consecutive patients treated in few of the other centers, which had comparable potential (large or small, public or private centers). R-CHOP-14 was given in 22/156 patients of the control group (14%).</p><p><b>Results:</b> The groups of R-da-EPOCH (<i>n</i> = 156) and R-CHOP-treated patients (<i>n</i> = 156) were absolutely comparable in terms of patients’ characteristics except for more frequent multiple extranodal involvement in R-CHOP (8.4% vs. 16.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.042). The 5-year freedom from progression (FFP), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for R-da-EPOCH versus R-CHOP were 87.5% versus 75.5% (<i>p</i> = 0.011), 84.4% versus 75.5% (<i>p</i> = 0.052 counting 4 t-AML cases after R-da-EPOCH as events) and 94.1% versus 86.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.039). Among patients potentially eligible for RT (no progressive disease), RT was administered to 10% versus 70% after R-da-EPOCH or R-CHOP. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, gender, multiple extranodal sites and recently published prognostic models (extranodal and LDH > 2x or bulk) the difference between R-da-EPOCH and R-CHOP remained significant regarding FFP, OS and EFS, when the extranodal-LDH model was assessed, but only for FFP when the extranodal-bulk model was taken into account (0.10 < <i>p</i> < 0.20 for EFS and OS). Only 77 (58%) of 133 patients with currently available data had absolute adherence to R-da-EPOCH protocol, reflecting the real-life situation. These patients had a 5-year FFP of 90.9% and 85.1% (<i>p</i> = 0.30).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our non-randomized, comparative study is by far the largest one comparing R-da-EPOCH versus R-CHOP and carried the least possible systematic error in the retrospective setting. R-da-EPOCH minimized the need of RT and demonst
背景:除了令人印象深刻的2期NCI结果之外,回顾性比较显示,在PMLBCL中,R-da-EPOCH与R-CHOP相比,在疾病控制和巩固放疗(RT)的需求减少方面,R-da-EPOCH有一定的、不显著的益处。然而,患者数量为小至中度(<<;100),治疗的选择由治疗医生自行决定,不可避免地引入了系统性偏见。目的:通过尽可能公正地选择对照组患者来评估R-da-EPOCH与R-CHOP的疗效。方法:在18个参与中心的所有PMLBCL≤65岁的连续患者(n = 156)中采用R-da-EPOCH,这些中心在此之前提供R-CHOP作为标准护理。r - chop治疗患者的对照组是从同一中心的数据库中设计的,如果可能的话,按照时间顺序(最近的首先)选择相同数量的连续患者,与在同一中心接受R-da-EPOCH治疗的患者,从而最大限度地减少选择偏差。由于一些中心缺乏适当的控制措施(<;20例接受r - chop治疗的患者较少),他们被少数具有类似潜力的其他中心(大型或小型,公共或私人中心)连续治疗的患者所取代。对照组156例患者中有22例(14%)给予R-CHOP-14。结果:R-da-EPOCH组(n = 156)和R-CHOP治疗组(n = 156)在患者特征方面完全相似,除了R-CHOP更频繁的多发性结外受损伤(8.4% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.042)。R-da-EPOCH与R-CHOP的5年无进展(FFP)、无事件生存率(EFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为87.5%对75.5% (p = 0.011)、84.4%对75.5% (p = 0.052,将R-da-EPOCH后的4例t-AML病例作为事件计算)和94.1%对86.9% (p = 0.039)。在可能符合RT(无进展性疾病)条件的患者中,接受R-da-EPOCH或R-CHOP的患者接受RT的比例为10%,而接受RT的比例为70%。在多变量分析中,在调整了年龄、性别、多个结外部位和最近发表的预后模型(结外和LDH >;当评估结外- ldh模型时,R-da-EPOCH和R-CHOP在FFP、OS和EFS方面的差异仍然显著,但仅在考虑结外-体积模型时,R-da-EPOCH和R-CHOP在FFP方面的差异(0.10 <;p & lt;EFS和OS为0.20)。目前可获得数据的133例患者中,只有77例(58%)绝对遵守R-da-EPOCH方案,反映了现实情况。5年FFP分别为90.9%和85.1% (p = 0.30)。结论:我们的非随机对照研究是迄今为止比较R-da-EPOCH和R-CHOP的最大规模的研究,并且在回顾性研究中系统误差最小。R-da-EPOCH最大限度地减少了RT的需要,并显示出明显更好的结果。考虑到R-da-EPOCH方案的频繁偏差和少数患者使用R-CHOP-14,两种方案之间的差异可能更大。关键词:侵袭性b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤;没有潜在的利益冲突来源。
{"title":"RITUXIMAB-DOSE-ADJUSTED EPOCH VERSUS RITUXIMAB-CHOP IN PRIMARY MEDIASTINAL LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA","authors":"T. Vassilakopoulos,&nbsp;Z. Mellios,&nbsp;G. Papageorgiou,&nbsp;A. Piperidou,&nbsp;E. Verigou,&nbsp;C. Chatzidimitriou,&nbsp;C. Kalpadakis,&nbsp;E. Katodritou,&nbsp;H. Giatra,&nbsp;V. Xanthopoulos,&nbsp;G. Gainaru,&nbsp;E. Vrakidou,&nbsp;T. Leonidopoulou,&nbsp;M. Kotsopoulou,&nbsp;M. Palassopoulou,&nbsp;S. Karakatsanis,&nbsp;M. Tsirogianni,&nbsp;E. Hatzimichael,&nbsp;E. Terpos,&nbsp;P. Zikos,&nbsp;C. Poziopoulos,&nbsp;E. Vervessou,&nbsp;M. Arapaki,&nbsp;A. Kopsaftopoulou,&nbsp;A. Liaskas,&nbsp;P. Katsaouni,&nbsp;J. Assimakopoulos,&nbsp;G. Kourti,&nbsp;D. Koutsiafes,&nbsp;M. Siakantaris,&nbsp;G. Karianakis,&nbsp;A. Symeonidis,&nbsp;D. Grentzelias,&nbsp;V. Pappa,&nbsp;P. Tsirigotis,&nbsp;E. Papadaki,&nbsp;E. Plata,&nbsp;M. Bakiri,&nbsp;G. Pangalis,&nbsp;M. Angelopoulou,&nbsp;M. Bouzani","doi":"10.1002/hon.70094_346","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70094_346","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Background:&lt;/b&gt; Further to the impressive phase 2 NCI results, retrospective comparisons have shown a modest, non-significant benefit in disease control and a reduced need for consolidative radiotherapy (RT) with R-da-EPOCH versus R-CHOP in PMLBCL. However, the numbers of patients were small-to-moderate (&lt;&lt; 100) and the choice of treatment was at the discretion of the treating physician, inevitably introducing systematic bias.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aims:&lt;/b&gt; To evaluate the efficacy of R-da-EPOCH versus R-CHOP with an -as much as possible- unbiased selection of control group patients&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; R-da-EPOCH was adopted in all consecutive patients with PMLBCL ≤ 65 years (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 156) in 18 participating Centers, which were providing R-CHOP as standard of care until that time. The control group of R-CHOP-treated patients was devised from the same Centers’ database, selecting in chronological order (most recent first) an equal number of consecutive patients to those treated with R-da-EPOCH at the same Center, if possible, thus minimizing selection bias. Due to lack of some appropriate controls in a few Centers (&lt; 20 R-CHOP-treated patients less), they were substituted by consecutive patients treated in few of the other centers, which had comparable potential (large or small, public or private centers). R-CHOP-14 was given in 22/156 patients of the control group (14%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; The groups of R-da-EPOCH (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 156) and R-CHOP-treated patients (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 156) were absolutely comparable in terms of patients’ characteristics except for more frequent multiple extranodal involvement in R-CHOP (8.4% vs. 16.0%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.042). The 5-year freedom from progression (FFP), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for R-da-EPOCH versus R-CHOP were 87.5% versus 75.5% (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.011), 84.4% versus 75.5% (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.052 counting 4 t-AML cases after R-da-EPOCH as events) and 94.1% versus 86.9% (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.039). Among patients potentially eligible for RT (no progressive disease), RT was administered to 10% versus 70% after R-da-EPOCH or R-CHOP. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, gender, multiple extranodal sites and recently published prognostic models (extranodal and LDH &gt; 2x or bulk) the difference between R-da-EPOCH and R-CHOP remained significant regarding FFP, OS and EFS, when the extranodal-LDH model was assessed, but only for FFP when the extranodal-bulk model was taken into account (0.10 &lt; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.20 for EFS and OS). Only 77 (58%) of 133 patients with currently available data had absolute adherence to R-da-EPOCH protocol, reflecting the real-life situation. These patients had a 5-year FFP of 90.9% and 85.1% (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.30).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; Our non-randomized, comparative study is by far the largest one comparing R-da-EPOCH versus R-CHOP and carried the least possible systematic error in the retrospective setting. R-da-EPOCH minimized the need of RT and demonst","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70094_346","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A SHORT (x3) NIVOLUMAB BEFORE BGD CHEMOTHERAPY IMPROVES THE REMISSION RATE IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY HODGKIN LYMPHOMA: N-BURGUND TRIAL OF THE POLISH LYMPHOMA RESEARCH GROUP 在BGD化疗前短期(x3)纳武单抗可提高复发/难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤的缓解率:波兰淋巴瘤研究组的N-BURGUND试验
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/hon.70094_357
J. M. Zaucha, E. Paszkiewicz-Kozik, M. Taszner, B. Małkowski, J. Rybka, K. Chromik, A. Kołkowska-Leśniak, E. Subocz, Ł. Targoński, P. Ceklarz, M. Witkowska, K. Domańska-Czyż, A. Giza, R. Swoboda, M. Kobylecka, C. Voltin, J. Romejko-Jarosińska, M. Świerkowska, B. Ostrowska, A. Druzd-Sitek, M. Kurlapski, M. Bednarek, G. Romanowicz, J. Góra-Tybor, J. Hałka, T. Wróbel, S. Giebel, G. Helbig, E. Lech-Marańda
<p><b>Introduction</b>: Achieving complete metabolic remission (CMR) before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation aHCT in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma patients (pts) improves their long-term outcomes. BGD (bendamustine, gemcitabine, dexamethasone) in a second line induces CMR in about 70% of r/r HL pts (Paszkiewicz-Kozik et al., <i>Hematological Oncology</i>, 42, Suppl, p364 2023). The phase 2 N-BURGUND trial (EudraCT 2021-002630-17) evaluates the efficacy and safety of a very short course of Nivolumab (N) (3 cycles) followed by 2 (up to maximum 4) cycles of BGD in r/r HL pts before aHCT <i>having hypothesized</i> that addition of Nx3 will improve the response to BGD (CMR) by 15%. Here, we present the efficacy and safety results of the enrolled patients.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Patients aged ≥ 18 years with r/r advanced stage (IIB-IV) HL after first-line treatment were eligible and received N 240 mg IV Q2W for three cycles followed by PET<sub>NIV</sub> and 2 to max four cycles of BGD (bendamustine 90 mg/m<sup>2</sup> D1,2; gemcitabine 800 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on D1,4; dexamethasone 40 mg on D1–4) combined with CD34+ cell mobilization followed by PET<sub>2BGD</sub>. Patients achieving CMR (Deauville score 1–3 assessed by the Central Reviewer Panel) are subjected to aHCT. The primary endpoint for this analysis is centrally assessed PET<sub>BGD</sub>-negativity response in patients after two cycles of BGD. The secondary endpoints are PET<sub>NIVO</sub> response and the results of circulating tumor DNA assessment at the time of PET examinations.</p><p><b>Results</b>: Between December 2022 and November 2024, 86 pts (50% females) with r/r cHL were enrolled from 9 centers affiliated with the PLRG. Median (range) age was 36 years (20–71); 71 (83%) patients received ABVD, 2 (2%) BV+AVD, and 13 (15%) BEACOPPesc in the first line. Forty pts (47%) were primary refractory, including 6 to BEACOPPesc and 2 to BV+AVD; twenty-five (29%) pts had an early relapse (< 12 months), whereas the remaining 21 (24%) had a late relapse. All patients have completed 3 × N and 2 × BGD. Eighty-four PET<sub>NIVO,</sub> and 78 PET<sub>BGD</sub> results were available at the time of submission. The PET<sub>NIVO</sub> negativity rate was 34%. Afterward, the PET<sub>BGD</sub> negativity rate increased to 86%. In 76 pts with two PET assessments available, BGD improved response in 37 (48%) pts. One patient required two more BGD cycles to achieve CMR. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) (26.5% of all AEs) occurred in 13 pts (22% of all pts). Drug-related grade 4 AEs included flare syndrome and anemia caused by pure red cell aplasia, which resolved after 6 months of treatment with steroids, rituximab, and bortezomib. Immune-mediated AEs (3,6% of all AEs) occurred in 5% of patients who received nivolumab. The most common AE was rash (14.5%) (Figure 1). There were no deaths during the study.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> A very short Nivolumab induction fo
在复发/难治性(r/r)经典霍奇金淋巴瘤患者(pts)的自体造血细胞移植aHCT前实现完全代谢缓解(CMR)可改善其长期预后。二线BGD(苯达莫司汀、吉西他滨、地塞米松)可诱导约70%的r/r HL患者发生CMR (Paszkiewicz-Kozik等,血液学肿瘤学,42,补品,p364 2023)。2期N- burgund试验(EudraCT 2021-002630-17)评估了Nivolumab (N)(3个周期)的极短疗程,然后在aHCT前对r/r HL患者进行2个(最多4个)周期的BGD治疗的有效性和安全性,并假设添加Nx3将使BGD (CMR)的反应提高15%。在这里,我们介绍了入组患者的疗效和安全性结果。方法:年龄≥18岁,接受一线治疗的r/r晚期(IIB-IV) HL患者,接受n240 mg IV Q2W,连续3个周期,随后是PETNIV和2至最多4个周期的BGD(苯达莫司汀90 mg/m2 D1,2;吉西他滨800 mg/m2 D1,4;地塞米松40 mg (D1-4)联合CD34+细胞动员,然后进行PET2BGD。达到CMR(多维尔评分1-3由中央评审小组评估)的患者接受aHCT。该分析的主要终点是集中评估两个周期BGD后患者的petbgd阴性反应。次要终点是PETNIVO反应和PET检查时循环肿瘤DNA评估结果。结果:在2022年12月至2024年11月期间,来自PLRG附属的9个中心的86名r/r cHL患者(50%为女性)入组。年龄中位数(范围)为36岁(20-71岁);71例(83%)患者在一线接受ABVD, 2例(2%)BV+AVD, 13例(15%)BEACOPPesc。40例(47%)为原发性难治性患者,其中6例为BEACOPPesc, 2例为BV+AVD;25例(29%)PTS有早期复发(<;12个月),而其余21例(24%)复发较晚。所有患者均完成3 × N和2 × BGD。提交时可获得84项PETNIVO和78项PETBGD结果。PETNIVO阴性率为34%。之后,PETBGD阴性率增加到86%。在76名接受两次PET评估的患者中,BGD改善了37名(48%)患者的反应。一名患者需要两个以上的BGD周期才能达到CMR。13名患者(22%)发生≥3级不良事件(ae)(占所有ae的26.5%)。药物相关的4级ae包括闪光综合征和由纯红细胞发育不全引起的贫血,在类固醇、利妥昔单抗和硼替佐米治疗6个月后消退。5%接受纳武单抗治疗的患者发生免疫介导的不良事件(占所有不良事件的3.6%)。最常见的AE是皮疹(14.5%)(图1)。研究期间没有死亡病例。结论:在r/r HL患者中,极短的纳沃单抗诱导后进行标准的二线BGD化疗耐受性良好,将BGD的反应(CMR率)从历史上的70%提高到86%。科研经费申报:波兰医学研究机构;关键词:化疗;潜在的利益冲突来源:J。持股:武田,BMS,罗氏,艾伯维,杨森,索比诺诺利亚:罗氏。顾问或顾问角色:艾伯维,武田,罗氏,荣誉:艾伯维,武田,罗氏教育资助:罗氏,武田。TasznerHonoraria: sobie教育补助金:TakedaJ。教育资助:BMS, ABBVIEC。顾问或咨询角色:诺华放射制药有限公司,诺华制药有限公司。教育补助金:拿达克。WróbelStock所有权:武田、罗氏、艾伯维、BMSHonoraria:安进、杨森
{"title":"A SHORT (x3) NIVOLUMAB BEFORE BGD CHEMOTHERAPY IMPROVES THE REMISSION RATE IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY HODGKIN LYMPHOMA: N-BURGUND TRIAL OF THE POLISH LYMPHOMA RESEARCH GROUP","authors":"J. M. Zaucha,&nbsp;E. Paszkiewicz-Kozik,&nbsp;M. Taszner,&nbsp;B. Małkowski,&nbsp;J. Rybka,&nbsp;K. Chromik,&nbsp;A. Kołkowska-Leśniak,&nbsp;E. Subocz,&nbsp;Ł. Targoński,&nbsp;P. Ceklarz,&nbsp;M. Witkowska,&nbsp;K. Domańska-Czyż,&nbsp;A. Giza,&nbsp;R. Swoboda,&nbsp;M. Kobylecka,&nbsp;C. Voltin,&nbsp;J. Romejko-Jarosińska,&nbsp;M. Świerkowska,&nbsp;B. Ostrowska,&nbsp;A. Druzd-Sitek,&nbsp;M. Kurlapski,&nbsp;M. Bednarek,&nbsp;G. Romanowicz,&nbsp;J. Góra-Tybor,&nbsp;J. Hałka,&nbsp;T. Wróbel,&nbsp;S. Giebel,&nbsp;G. Helbig,&nbsp;E. Lech-Marańda","doi":"10.1002/hon.70094_357","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70094_357","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Introduction&lt;/b&gt;: Achieving complete metabolic remission (CMR) before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation aHCT in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma patients (pts) improves their long-term outcomes. BGD (bendamustine, gemcitabine, dexamethasone) in a second line induces CMR in about 70% of r/r HL pts (Paszkiewicz-Kozik et al., &lt;i&gt;Hematological Oncology&lt;/i&gt;, 42, Suppl, p364 2023). The phase 2 N-BURGUND trial (EudraCT 2021-002630-17) evaluates the efficacy and safety of a very short course of Nivolumab (N) (3 cycles) followed by 2 (up to maximum 4) cycles of BGD in r/r HL pts before aHCT &lt;i&gt;having hypothesized&lt;/i&gt; that addition of Nx3 will improve the response to BGD (CMR) by 15%. Here, we present the efficacy and safety results of the enrolled patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; Patients aged ≥ 18 years with r/r advanced stage (IIB-IV) HL after first-line treatment were eligible and received N 240 mg IV Q2W for three cycles followed by PET&lt;sub&gt;NIV&lt;/sub&gt; and 2 to max four cycles of BGD (bendamustine 90 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; D1,2; gemcitabine 800 mg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; on D1,4; dexamethasone 40 mg on D1–4) combined with CD34+ cell mobilization followed by PET&lt;sub&gt;2BGD&lt;/sub&gt;. Patients achieving CMR (Deauville score 1–3 assessed by the Central Reviewer Panel) are subjected to aHCT. The primary endpoint for this analysis is centrally assessed PET&lt;sub&gt;BGD&lt;/sub&gt;-negativity response in patients after two cycles of BGD. The secondary endpoints are PET&lt;sub&gt;NIVO&lt;/sub&gt; response and the results of circulating tumor DNA assessment at the time of PET examinations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results&lt;/b&gt;: Between December 2022 and November 2024, 86 pts (50% females) with r/r cHL were enrolled from 9 centers affiliated with the PLRG. Median (range) age was 36 years (20–71); 71 (83%) patients received ABVD, 2 (2%) BV+AVD, and 13 (15%) BEACOPPesc in the first line. Forty pts (47%) were primary refractory, including 6 to BEACOPPesc and 2 to BV+AVD; twenty-five (29%) pts had an early relapse (&lt; 12 months), whereas the remaining 21 (24%) had a late relapse. All patients have completed 3 × N and 2 × BGD. Eighty-four PET&lt;sub&gt;NIVO,&lt;/sub&gt; and 78 PET&lt;sub&gt;BGD&lt;/sub&gt; results were available at the time of submission. The PET&lt;sub&gt;NIVO&lt;/sub&gt; negativity rate was 34%. Afterward, the PET&lt;sub&gt;BGD&lt;/sub&gt; negativity rate increased to 86%. In 76 pts with two PET assessments available, BGD improved response in 37 (48%) pts. One patient required two more BGD cycles to achieve CMR. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) (26.5% of all AEs) occurred in 13 pts (22% of all pts). Drug-related grade 4 AEs included flare syndrome and anemia caused by pure red cell aplasia, which resolved after 6 months of treatment with steroids, rituximab, and bortezomib. Immune-mediated AEs (3,6% of all AEs) occurred in 5% of patients who received nivolumab. The most common AE was rash (14.5%) (Figure 1). There were no deaths during the study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; A very short Nivolumab induction fo","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70094_357","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FIXED DURATION TREATMENT OF BENDAMUSTINE-RITUXIMAB AND ACALABRUTINIB IN FRONTLINE WALDENSTROM’S MACROGLOBULINEMIA: DEEP MOLECULAR RESPONSES IN HIGH-RISK PATIENT SUBSETS 苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗和阿卡鲁替尼治疗一线华登斯特罗姆的巨球蛋白血症:高危患者亚群的深层分子反应
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/hon.70093_54
A. Suleman, K. Roos, K. Mangoff, Y. Jiang, G. Klein, D. Villa, D. MacDonald, M. Aljama, M. Shafey, N. Forward, J. Larouche, A. Nikonova, M. Sebag, I. Sandhu, S. Chow, R. McClure, M. Gallucci, H. Simmons, G. Tomlinson, N. L. Berinstein

Background: An optimal first-line therapy for Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) has not been defined. We postulated that combining bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with acalabrutinib will result in deep and durable responses, particularly in high-risk patient subsets.

Methods: The BRAWM clinical trial (NCT04624906) combined BR and acalabrutinib in a one-year, fixed duration treatment course of six 28-day cycles of BR and 365 days of concurrent acalabrutinib. This phase II trial took place at 9 clinical sites across Canada. The primary outcome was combined complete response + very good partial response (CR+VGPR) rate, and secondary outcomes included PFS, OS and Measurable Residual Disease (MRD). Outcomes were assessed for all participants, and for high-risk subsets (MYD88WT, CXCR4MUT and TP53MUT). MRD analyses uses bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples collected at trial specific time points, assessments being performed by Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, USA) using the clonoSEQ assay. Outcomes were compared between high-risk and non-high risk subsets.

Results: This trial enrolled 63 participants. The median age was 69 years (range 39–85), and 49 (78%) were male, 38% intermediate-risk and 51% high-risk IPSS-WM score. Mutational analysis in 57 participants showed 50 (88%) were MYD88MUT and 16 (30%) were CXCR4MUT, 1 was TP53 MUT. CR+VGPR occurred in 37/59 participants (62.7%) at cycle 7, 28/45 (62.2%) at cycle 12, and 21/39 (53.8%) at month 18 (Figure 1A). The median follow-up was 18 months (1.4–42.4). Both 24-month OS and PFS were 97.6% (95% CI: 93%–100%), 1 participant died at 15 months unrelated to treatment. On univariate analysis, CXCR4MUT was not associated with inferior CR+VGPR rate at 1 year (p = 0.10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 31/63 participants during combination therapy, most common being neutropenia (n = 23) and thrombocytopenia (n = 3). During monotherapy, 13/59 participants had a grade 3/4 TRAE, 6 of whom had neutropenia. MRD negativity (threshold of 10−6) in PB was 82% at cycle 7, 91% at cycle 12 and 71% at month 18. MRD negativity in BM was not as frequent but increased in BM over time (9% at cycle 7, 12% at cycle 12 and 23% at month 18). MRD negativity rates at cycles 7 and 12 were similar in those with and without CXCR4MUT and MYD88WT (Figure 1B). Log reductions of MRD in PB and BM in high-risk subsets were also comparable to corresponding non-high risk subsets.

Conclusions: Fixed duration BR and acalabrutinib was effective and well-tolerated. This regimen achieves amongst the highest CR+VGPR rates seen in frontline WM trials. Acknowledging sample size limitations, high-risk sub

背景:瓦尔登斯特罗姆大球蛋白血症(WM)的最佳一线治疗尚未确定。我们假设苯达莫司汀和利妥昔单抗(BR)与阿卡拉布替尼联合使用将产生深度和持久的反应,特别是在高危患者亚群中。方法:browm临床试验(NCT04624906)联合BR和阿卡拉布替尼,为期一年,固定疗程,6个28天的BR周期和365天的阿卡拉布替尼同步治疗。这项II期试验在加拿大的9个临床地点进行。主要终点是完全缓解+非常好的部分缓解(CR+VGPR)率,次要终点包括PFS、OS和可测量残留疾病(MRD)。评估所有参与者以及高危亚群(MYD88WT、CXCR4MUT和TP53MUT)的结果。MRD分析使用在试验特定时间点收集的骨髓(BM)和外周血(PB)样本,评估由Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, USA)使用clonoSEQ测定法进行。比较高风险和非高风险亚群的结果。结果:该试验招募了63名受试者。中位年龄69岁(39 ~ 85岁),男性49例(78%),IPSS-WM评分中危38%,高危51%。57名参与者的突变分析显示,50名(88%)为MYD88MUT, 16名(30%)为CXCR4MUT, 1名为TP53 MUT。CR+VGPR在第7周期发生在37/59例(62.7%),在第12周期发生在28/45例(62.2%),在第18个月发生在21/39例(53.8%)(图1A)。中位随访时间为18个月(1.4-42.4)。24个月的OS和PFS均为97.6% (95% CI: 93%-100%), 1名参与者在15个月时死亡,与治疗无关。在单因素分析中,CXCR4MUT与1年后较低的CR+VGPR率无关(p = 0.10)。在联合治疗期间,31/63名参与者发生了3/4级治疗相关不良事件(TRAE),最常见的是中性粒细胞减少(n = 23)和血小板减少(n = 3)。在单药治疗期间,13/59的参与者有3/4级TRAE,其中6人有中性粒细胞减少症。PB的MRD阴性(阈值为10−6)在第7周期为82%,第12周期为91%,第18个月为71%。BM中MRD阴性并不常见,但随着时间的推移而增加(第7周期为9%,第12周期为12%,第18个月为23%)。在有和没有CXCR4MUT和MYD88WT的患者中,第7和12周期的MRD阴性率相似(图1B)。高危人群中PB和BM的MRD的对数降低也与相应的非高危人群相当。结论:固定疗程的BR和阿卡拉布替尼有效且耐受性良好。该方案在一线WM试验中实现了最高的CR+VGPR率。考虑到样本量的限制,高风险亚组的CR+VGPR和MRD阴性率与相应的非高风险亚组相似。我们假设,在本试验中观察到的深度反应和高MRD阴性率可能转化为高风险和非高风险WM患者亚群的持久反应和延长生存期。研究经费声明:阿斯利康免费提供阿卡拉布替尼和试验经费;关键词:微小残留病;联合疗法;潜在的利益冲突来源:D。顾问或顾问角色:罗氏、艾伯维、杨森、百济神州、阿斯利康、BMS/Celgene、Kite/Gilead、协和麒麟、Incyte、默克;罗氏、艾伯维、杨森、百济神州、阿斯利康、BMS/Celgene、Kite/Gilead、协和麒麟、Incyte、默克。顾问或顾问角色:艾伯维、阿斯利康、百济神州、吉利德、罗氏、希捷;顾问或顾问角色:辉瑞、杨森、百济神州、赛诺菲;shafey顾问或顾问角色:阿斯利康、百辰、詹森、罗氏;前瞻性顾问或顾问角色:艾伯维、阿斯利康、百济神州、新基/BMS、杨森、Kite/Gilead、辉瑞、罗氏、SeaGen、serviaria:百济神州、阿斯利康、罗氏、SeaGenJ。顾问或顾问角色:阿斯利康。顾问或顾问角色:Janssen, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Gilead, karyopharnomaria: Janssen, Apotex, GileadI。制药公司:杨森、Celgene/BMS、辉瑞、赛诺菲、吉利德/Kite、Vertex、GSKM。就业或领导职位:Adaptive Biotechnologies Inc.H。应聘职位:Adaptive Biotechnologies inc .顾问或顾问角色:阿斯利康和百济
{"title":"FIXED DURATION TREATMENT OF BENDAMUSTINE-RITUXIMAB AND ACALABRUTINIB IN FRONTLINE WALDENSTROM’S MACROGLOBULINEMIA: DEEP MOLECULAR RESPONSES IN HIGH-RISK PATIENT SUBSETS","authors":"A. Suleman,&nbsp;K. Roos,&nbsp;K. Mangoff,&nbsp;Y. Jiang,&nbsp;G. Klein,&nbsp;D. Villa,&nbsp;D. MacDonald,&nbsp;M. Aljama,&nbsp;M. Shafey,&nbsp;N. Forward,&nbsp;J. Larouche,&nbsp;A. Nikonova,&nbsp;M. Sebag,&nbsp;I. Sandhu,&nbsp;S. Chow,&nbsp;R. McClure,&nbsp;M. Gallucci,&nbsp;H. Simmons,&nbsp;G. Tomlinson,&nbsp;N. L. Berinstein","doi":"10.1002/hon.70093_54","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70093_54","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> An optimal first-line therapy for Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) has not been defined. We postulated that combining bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with acalabrutinib will result in deep and durable responses, particularly in high-risk patient subsets.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> The BRAWM clinical trial (NCT04624906) combined BR and acalabrutinib in a one-year, fixed duration treatment course of six 28-day cycles of BR and 365 days of concurrent acalabrutinib. This phase II trial took place at 9 clinical sites across Canada. The primary outcome was combined complete response + very good partial response (CR+VGPR) rate, and secondary outcomes included PFS, OS and Measurable Residual Disease (MRD). Outcomes were assessed for all participants, and for high-risk subsets (<i>MYD88</i><sup><i>WT</i></sup><i>, CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and <i>TP53</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup>). MRD analyses uses bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples collected at trial specific time points, assessments being performed by Adaptive Biotechnologies (Seattle, USA) using the clonoSEQ assay. Outcomes were compared between high-risk and non-high risk subsets.</p><p><b>Results:</b> This trial enrolled 63 participants. The median age was 69 years (range 39–85), and 49 (78%) were male, 38% intermediate-risk and 51% high-risk IPSS-WM score. Mutational analysis in 57 participants showed 50 (88%) were <i>MYD88</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and 16 (30%) were <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup>, 1 was <i>TP53</i> <sup><i>MUT</i></sup>. CR+VGPR occurred in 37/59 participants (62.7%) at cycle 7, 28/45 (62.2%) at cycle 12, and 21/39 (53.8%) at month 18 (Figure 1A). The median follow-up was 18 months (1.4–42.4). Both 24-month OS and PFS were 97.6% (95% CI: 93%–100%), 1 participant died at 15 months unrelated to treatment. On univariate analysis, <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> was not associated with inferior CR+VGPR rate at 1 year (<i>p</i> = 0.10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 31/63 participants during combination therapy, most common being neutropenia (<i>n</i> = 23) and thrombocytopenia (<i>n</i> = 3). During monotherapy, 13/59 participants had a grade 3/4 TRAE, 6 of whom had neutropenia. MRD negativity (threshold of 10<sup>−6</sup>) in PB was 82% at cycle 7, 91% at cycle 12 and 71% at month 18. MRD negativity in BM was not as frequent but increased in BM over time (9% at cycle 7, 12% at cycle 12 and 23% at month 18). MRD negativity rates at cycles 7 and 12 were similar in those with and without <i>CXCR4</i><sup><i>MUT</i></sup> and <i>MYD88</i><sup><i>WT</i></sup> (Figure 1B). Log reductions of MRD in PB and BM in high-risk subsets were also comparable to corresponding non-high risk subsets.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Fixed duration BR and acalabrutinib was effective and well-tolerated. This regimen achieves amongst the highest CR+VGPR rates seen in frontline WM trials. Acknowledging sample size limitations, high-risk sub","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70093_54","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current Status of Revisions to the Lugano Classification in Lymphoma 淋巴瘤Lugano分类的修订现状
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/hon.70103
The Organizing Committee of the Lugano Classification Workshop

In the decade since publication of the Lugano Classification (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol 2014,32:3059–3068; Barrington et al, J Clin Oncol 2014, 32:3048–3058), major advances in lymphoma therapy and assessment, including metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) prompted a workshop at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma-17 entitled “Lugano Classification: Looking Toward the Future”, to determine whether a revision was warranted and what it should look like. This report summarizes the conclusions of that workshop and a subsequent questionnaire of the participants. It was concluded that, whereas, minor modifications could be made now, the current classification should remain the standard until the clinical benefit of MTV and ctDNA are firmly established and practical considerations demonstrated. An ICML sponsored standing committee will monitor progress and ensure that a revision of the Lugano Classification will be proposed when warranted.

自Lugano分类发表以来的十年(Cheson et al ., journal clinical oncology, 2014,32:3059 - 3068;Barrington等,J clinical oncology, 2014, 32:3048-3058),淋巴瘤治疗和评估的重大进展,包括代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)和循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA),促使恶性淋巴瘤国际会议-17召开了题为“Lugano分类:展望未来”的研讨会,以确定是否有必要进行修订,以及修订应该是什么样子。本报告总结了该讲习班的结论和随后与会者的调查表。结论是,尽管现在可以进行微小的修改,但在MTV和ctDNA的临床益处得到牢固确立和实际考虑得到证实之前,目前的分类仍应保持标准。由ICML赞助的常设委员会将监测进展情况,并确保在必要时提出修订卢加诺分类的建议。
{"title":"Current Status of Revisions to the Lugano Classification in Lymphoma","authors":"The Organizing Committee of the Lugano Classification Workshop","doi":"10.1002/hon.70103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70103","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the decade since publication of the Lugano Classification (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol 2014,32:3059–3068; Barrington et al, J Clin Oncol 2014, 32:3048–3058), major advances in lymphoma therapy and assessment, including metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) prompted a workshop at the International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma-17 entitled “Lugano Classification: Looking Toward the Future”, to determine whether a revision was warranted and what it should look like. This report summarizes the conclusions of that workshop and a subsequent questionnaire of the participants. It was concluded that, whereas, minor modifications could be made now, the current classification should remain the standard until the clinical benefit of MTV and ctDNA are firmly established and practical considerations demonstrated. An ICML sponsored standing committee will monitor progress and ensure that a revision of the Lugano Classification will be proposed when warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70103","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TREATMENT OF NEWLY-DIAGNOSED FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA WITH RITUXIMAB, GOLCADOMIDE +/- NIVOLUMAB- INTERIM ANALYSIS OF THE PHASE II TOP-FLOR STUDY 利妥昔单抗、golcadomide +/- nivolumab治疗新诊断滤泡性淋巴瘤——ii期顶层研究的中期分析
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/hon.70094_230
A. Martynchyck, G. Chong, A. Barraclough, S. Ratnasingam, T. Marconi, J. B. Palmer, C. Keane, S. T. B. Lee, A. M. Scott, A. Romano, L. Churilov, D. Lee, E. A. Hawkes

Background: Standard rituximab (R) +lenalidomide (R2) or chemoimmunotherapy is effective in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma (TN FL) but is associated with Grade 3–4 AE rates > 65% with elderly patients (pts) overrepresented. Golcadomide (Golca) is a potent first-in-class oral Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulator (CELMoD) with dual immunomodulatory and anti-tumor activity 10- to 100-fold enhanced compared to lenalidomide, preferential lymphoid organ distribution and a favourable toxicity profile (Chavez ASH 2024; Amzallag ASH 2024). R-Golca yields responses in 93% relapsed FL. We have demonstrated immune augmentation, safety and efficacy of PD1/PDL1i nivolumab (N) +rituximab, and atezolizumab-obinutuzumab-radiotherapy in TN FL (Chong ASCO 2024; Barraclough Blood Adv 2025). We describe here the interim analysis of a randomised phase II study of R-Golca +/- N in stage II-IV, Grade 1–3A TN FL. (Chong ASCO 2024)

Methods: TOP-FLOR (NCT05788081) is an investigator-led multicentre randomised open label umbrella Baysian Optimal Phase II trial in TN FL. Up to 40pts will be randomised 1:1 to receive 8 cycles of induction therapy Q4W: R (375 mg/m2 IV, D1), Golca (0.4 mg p.o daily, D1–14) +/- N (480 mg IV, D1) and 2 years of R maintenance (Q12W). The primary endpoint is rate of Complete Metabolic Response (CMR) in the absence of cessation due to prohibitive toxicity (CTCAE V5.0) following induction. Interim efficacy analysis (PET/CT Lugano response) in the first 22 pts was pre-planned, with a predefined futility threshold of 7/11 CMR (63.6%) in each arm.

Results: The interim analysis included 22 enrolled pts (11 per arm). Median age was 64.5y (range 49–77) with 68% male. CMR rate at the end of induction was 82% (18/22; 95% CI: 60%, 95%), CMR rate by arm in the futility cohort, was: 10/11 (92%) R-Golca and 8/11 (73%) R-Golca+N with 1 permanently ceasing due to Gr4 sepsis in cycle 1, unrelated to therapy and 1 ceasing due to disease progression (Figure 1). Proportion of pts experiencing an AE during induction were: 100% Gr1, 82% Gr2, 64% Gr3, 9% Gr4 (2pt). Most frequent of any grade were infection (77%; 95% CI: 54%–92% [Gr3 14%]), neutrophil count decrease (63%; 95% CI: 40–82% [Gr3+ 92%; plus 2 pt Gr3 febrile neutropenia]; 10pts received G-CSF) and maculo-papular rash (45%; 95% CI: 24%–67%—all in pts who had bactrim & allopurinol which resolved on cessation of allopurinol); 2 pts R-Golca +N arm and 1 pt in the R-Golca arm had Golca dose reduction to 0.3 mg due to adverse events. 18/22 remain on treatment. Interim results reached the threshold for continued recruitment in both arms.

Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that Rituximab-golcadomide +/-nivolumab is a highly effective combination therapy in TN FL with manageable toxicity, most commonly neutropenia and infection. Differences between arms could not be elucidated in this preplanned interim analysis. The study continues recruit

背景:标准利妥昔单抗(R) +来那度胺(R2)或化学免疫治疗对treatment-naïve滤泡性淋巴瘤(TN FL)有效,但与3-4级AE发生率相关。65%的老年患者(pts)比例过高。Golcadomide (Golca)是一种有效的一流口服Cereblon E3连接酶调节剂(CELMoD),具有双重免疫调节和抗肿瘤活性,比来那度胺增强10至100倍,具有优先的淋巴器官分布和良好的毒性特征(Chavez ASH 2024;Amzallag ASH 2024)。R-Golca在93%的复发性FL中产生了应答。我们已经证明了PD1/PDL1i nivolumab (N) +rituximab和atezolizumab-obinutuzumab-放疗在TN FL中的免疫增强、安全性和有效性(Chong ASCO 2024;Barraclough Blood Adv 2025)。这里描述的临时分析随机二期研究阶段II-IV R-Golca + / - N的年级1-3A TN FL。(Chong ASCO 2024)方法:TOP-FLOR (NCT05788081)是一种investigator-led多中心随机开放标签伞Baysian优二期试验在TN FL。40分将随机1:1接受8周期诱导疗法Q4W: R (375 mg / m2 IV, D1) Golca(0.4毫克,每日订单,D1-14) + / - N(480毫克IV, D1)和2年的R维修(Q12W)。主要终点是诱导后没有因禁止性毒性(CTCAE V5.0)而停止的完全代谢缓解率(CMR)。前22名患者的中期疗效分析(PET/CT卢加诺反应)是预先计划的,每组的无效阈值为7/11 CMR(63.6%)。结果:中期分析包括22名入组患者(每组11人)。中位年龄为64.5岁(49-77岁),其中68%为男性。诱导结束时CMR率为82% (18/22;95% CI: 60%, 95%),无效队列中各组CMR率为:10/11 (92%)R-Golca和8/11 (73%)R-Golca+N,其中1例因第1周期的Gr4败血症而永久停止,与治疗无关,1例因疾病进展而停止(图1)。在诱导过程中发生AE的患者比例为:100% Gr1, 82% Gr2, 64% Gr3, 9% Gr4 (2pt)。所有级别中最常见的是感染(77%;95% CI: 54%-92% [Gr3 14%]),中性粒细胞计数下降(63%;95% CI: 40-82% [Gr3+ 92%;+ 2 pt Gr3发热性中性粒细胞减少症];10人接受G-CSF)和斑疹丘疹(45%;95% CI: 24% - 67% -所有患者均有背部修剪;别嘌呤醇(停止使用别嘌呤醇后解决);R-Golca +N组的2名患者和R-Golca组的1名患者由于不良事件将Golca剂量减少至0.3 mg。18/22仍在接受治疗。中期结果达到了两个兵种继续招募的门槛。结论:这是第一个证明利妥昔单抗-金卡多胺+/-纳武单抗是一种高效的TN FL联合治疗方法,毒性可控,最常见的是中性粒细胞减少和感染。在这个预先计划的中期分析中不能阐明两组之间的差异。研究还在继续招募。研究经费声明:本试验由百时美施贵宝(Bristol-Myers Squibb)研究者赞助的研究经费支持。百时美施贵宝(Bristol-Myers Squibb)提供的Nivolumab和golcadomide。关键词:联合治疗;惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤;正在进行的试验潜在的利益冲突来源:其他薪酬:赠款资助:百时美施贵宝公司。其他报酬:补助金-百时美施贵宝。A. hawkesconsultants或advisory role: Bristol-Myers Squibb;薪酬:Grant funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb
{"title":"TREATMENT OF NEWLY-DIAGNOSED FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA WITH RITUXIMAB, GOLCADOMIDE +/- NIVOLUMAB- INTERIM ANALYSIS OF THE PHASE II TOP-FLOR STUDY","authors":"A. Martynchyck,&nbsp;G. Chong,&nbsp;A. Barraclough,&nbsp;S. Ratnasingam,&nbsp;T. Marconi,&nbsp;J. B. Palmer,&nbsp;C. Keane,&nbsp;S. T. B. Lee,&nbsp;A. M. Scott,&nbsp;A. Romano,&nbsp;L. Churilov,&nbsp;D. Lee,&nbsp;E. A. Hawkes","doi":"10.1002/hon.70094_230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70094_230","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> Standard rituximab (R) +lenalidomide (R2) or chemoimmunotherapy is effective in treatment-naïve follicular lymphoma (TN FL) but is associated with Grade 3–4 AE rates &gt; 65% with elderly patients (pts) overrepresented. Golcadomide (Golca) is a potent first-in-class oral Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulator (CELMoD) with dual immunomodulatory and anti-tumor activity 10- to 100-fold enhanced compared to lenalidomide, preferential lymphoid organ distribution and a favourable toxicity profile (Chavez ASH 2024; Amzallag ASH 2024). R-Golca yields responses in 93% relapsed FL. We have demonstrated immune augmentation, safety and efficacy of PD1/PDL1i nivolumab (N) +rituximab, and atezolizumab-obinutuzumab-radiotherapy in TN FL (Chong ASCO 2024; Barraclough Blood Adv 2025). We describe here the interim analysis of a randomised phase II study of R-Golca +/- N in stage II-IV, Grade 1–3A TN FL. (Chong ASCO 2024)</p><p><b>Methods:</b> TOP-FLOR (NCT05788081) is an investigator-led multicentre randomised open label umbrella Baysian Optimal Phase II trial in TN FL. Up to 40pts will be randomised 1:1 to receive 8 cycles of induction therapy Q4W: R (375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> IV, D1), Golca (0.4 mg p.o daily, D1–14) +/- N (480 mg IV, D1) and 2 years of R maintenance (Q12W). The primary endpoint is rate of Complete Metabolic Response (CMR) in the absence of cessation due to prohibitive toxicity (CTCAE V5.0) following induction. Interim efficacy analysis (PET/CT Lugano response) in the first 22 pts was pre-planned, with a predefined futility threshold of 7/11 CMR (63.6%) in each arm.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The interim analysis included 22 enrolled pts (11 per arm). Median age was 64.5y (range 49–77) with 68% male. CMR rate at the end of induction was 82% (18/22; 95% CI: 60%, 95%), CMR rate by arm in the futility cohort, was: 10/11 (92%) R-Golca and 8/11 (73%) R-Golca+N with 1 permanently ceasing due to Gr4 sepsis in cycle 1, unrelated to therapy and 1 ceasing due to disease progression (Figure 1). Proportion of pts experiencing an AE during induction were: 100% Gr1, 82% Gr2, 64% Gr3, 9% Gr4 (2pt). Most frequent of any grade were infection (77%; 95% CI: 54%–92% [Gr3 14%]), neutrophil count decrease (63%; 95% CI: 40–82% [Gr3+ 92%; plus 2 pt Gr3 febrile neutropenia]; 10pts received G-CSF) and maculo-papular rash (45%; 95% CI: 24%–67%—all in pts who had bactrim &amp; allopurinol which resolved on cessation of allopurinol); 2 pts R-Golca +N arm and 1 pt in the R-Golca arm had Golca dose reduction to 0.3 mg due to adverse events. 18/22 remain on treatment. Interim results reached the threshold for continued recruitment in both arms.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> This is the first study to demonstrate that Rituximab-golcadomide +/-nivolumab is a highly effective combination therapy in TN FL with manageable toxicity, most commonly neutropenia and infection. Differences between arms could not be elucidated in this preplanned interim analysis. The study continues recruit","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70094_230","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
EPCORITAMAB MONOTHERAPY DEMONSTRATES DEEP AND DURABLE RESPONSES AT 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA 在复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的3年随访中,Epcoritamab单药治疗显示出深刻和持久的反应
IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/hon.70094_240
K. M. Linton, J. M. Vose, W. Jurczak, P. J. Lugtenburg, E. Gyan, J. C. Chavez, A. Sureda, J. H. Christensen, H. Tilly, R. Córdoba, D. J. Lewis, M. Hutchings, M. Roost Clausen, J. Sancho, T. Cochrane, S. Leppä, M. E. D. Chamuleau, C. Thieblemont, P. F. Caimi, Y. H. Karimi, C. Andreadis, K. Izutsu, N. Fukuhara, E. Favaro, P. Patah, M. Geybels, I. Altintaş, C. Morehouse, U. Vitolo
<p><b>Introduction:</b> Epcoritamab (epcor), a subcutaneous (SC) CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody, is approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy (3L+) based on EPCORE NHL-1 FL (NCT03625037; US/EU; Linton KM, et al. <i>Lancet Haem</i> 2024;11:E593–E605) and NHL-3 FL (NCT04542824; Japan) expansion cohorts (EXP) results. NHL-1 cycle (C) 1 optimization cohort (OPT) implemented a 3-step-up dosing (3-SUD) regimen to support outpatient utilization of epcor in FL. We report 3-y follow-up (FU) from EXP and updated OPT results for epcor monotherapy in patients (pts) with 3L+ FL.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Pts with CD20+ R/R FL grade[G] 1–3A and ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic treatment (tx) received SC epcor in 28-d Cs until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. NHL-1 (<i>N</i> = 128) and NHL-3 (<i>N</i> = 21) EXP were pooled for diversity; OPT is reported separately. For EXP, the primary endpoint was efficacy; secondary endpoints were minimal residual disease (ClonoSeq®) negativity and safety. Due to the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pts from EXP, sensitivity analyses with conservative adjustment for COVID-19 deaths were conducted for efficacy. For OPT, the primary endpoint was incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS); secondary endpoints were response rates and safety.</p><p><b>Results:</b> As of Dec 2024, median FU was 35 mo and 15.5 mo and median duration of tx was 9.7 mo and 11.4 mo in EXP(<i>N</i> = 149) and OPT(<i>N</i> = 86), respectively. Across cohorts, pts were heavily pretreated (median 3 prior lines) and had high-risk R/R FL features. In the pooled EXP, overall response rate (ORR) was 84.6% and complete response rate (CRR) was 67.1% (Table).</p><p>With longer-term FU, safety from EXP was generally consistent with previous reports. In EXP, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic peak, 34.9% of pts had G3–4 infections (18.1% COVID-19) and 7.4% had G5 events (5.4% COVID-19). 28% of pts discontinued (d/c) tx due to tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 12.1% COVID-19). G3 or higher infections were reported in 14.3% of pts on ≥ 2y of tx (<i>n</i> = 35).</p><p>In OPT, updated ORR/CRR were 91.9%/73.3%; time-to-event endpoint data were still maturing, with most pts alive (93%).</p><p>With additional FU, safety from OPT remained unchanged from prior reports of only low-grade CRS (39.5% G1 and 9.3% G2) and no immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). In OPT, conducted post COVID-19 pandemic peak, 20.9% of pts had G3–4 infections (7.0% COVID-19, all G3); 1 pt had G5 TEAE of viral respiratory tract infection. TEAEs leading to tx d/c occurred in 11% (1.2% COVID).</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Epcor monotherapy demonstrated deep and durable responses and manageable safety with no new safety signals at 3y in a large and diversified 3L+ FL global population. OPT cohort results show response rates consistent with those in EXP and confirm the favorable safety profi
Epcoritamab (epcor),一种皮下(SC) CD3xCD20双特异性抗体,被批准用于复发/难治性(R/R)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL),在基于EPCORE NHL-1 FL (NCT03625037;美国/欧盟;Linton KM,等。Lancet Haem 2024;11: E593-E605)和NHL-3 FL (NCT04542824;日本)扩展队列(EXP)结果。NHL-1周期(C) 1优化队列(OPT)实施了3次逐步给药(3-SUD)方案,以支持FL患者门诊使用epor。我们报告了3L+ FL患者(pts)的3年随访(FU)和更新的epor单药治疗的OPT结果。方法:CD20+ R/R FL等级[G] 1 - 3a和≥2个既往系统治疗线(tx)的患者在28 d Cs中接受SC epor,直到疾病进展或不可接受的毒性。混合NHL-1 (N = 128)和NHL-3 (N = 21) EXP进行多样性分析;OPT单独报告。对于EXP,主要终点是疗效;次要终点为最小残留病(ClonoSeq®)阴性和安全性。由于COVID-19大流行对EXP患者的不成比例的影响,对COVID-19死亡进行保守调整的敏感性分析以评估疗效。对于OPT,主要终点是细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)的发生率和严重程度;次要终点是有效率和安全性。结果:截至2024年12月,EXP(N = 149)和OPT(N = 86)患者的中位FU分别为35个月和15.5个月,tx的中位持续时间分别为9.7个月和11.4个月。在整个队列中,患者接受了大量预处理(中位数为3条既往线),并具有高风险的R/R FL特征。在合并EXP中,总缓解率(ORR)为84.6%,完全缓解率(CRR)为67.1%(表)。对于长期FU, EXP的安全性与先前的报道基本一致。在COVID-19大流行高峰期进行的EXP中,34.9%的患者发生了G3-4感染(18.1%的患者发生了COVID-19), 7.4%的患者发生了G5感染(5.4%的患者发生了COVID-19)。28%的患者因紧急不良事件(teae)而停药(d/c);COVID-19 12.1%)。在治疗≥2y时,14.3%的患者报告G3或更高的感染(n = 35)。在OPT中,更新后的ORR/CRR分别为91.9%/73.3%;时间到事件终点数据仍然成熟,大多数PTS存活(93%)。加上额外的FU, OPT的安全性与之前报道的低级别CRS (G1为39.5%,G2为9.3%)和无免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)相比保持不变。在COVID-19大流行高峰期后进行的OPT中,20.9%的患者感染了G3 - 4(7.0%的患者感染了G3);1例患者病毒性呼吸道感染TEAE为G5级。导致tx d/c的teae发生率为11% (COVID为1.2%)。结论:Epcor单药治疗在全球3L+ FL人群中显示出深度和持久的反应和可管理的安全性,在3y时没有新的安全信号。OPT队列结果显示反应率与EXP一致,证实了epcor良好的安全性,3-SUD方案降低了CRS/ICANS的发生率和严重程度,降低了大流行后COVID-19的发病率。研究经费声明:研究由Genmab A/S和AbbVie赞助。关键词:惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤潜在利益冲突来源:K。顾问或顾问角色:Beigene, Celgene教育资助:Celgene其他薪酬:研究经费:Beigene, Celgene, Janssen, Step Pharma, Regeneron, MorhoSys, MSD, Nurix, AstraZeneca;发言人局:CelgeneJ。顾问或顾问角色:Adaptive, Genmab, onother薪酬:研究资金:Epizyme, Genmab, LoxoW。顾问或顾问角色:百辰、杨森、阿斯利康、Regeneron、艾伯维、礼来、罗氏、武田。其他报酬:研究经费:百辰、杨森、阿斯利康、Regeneron、艾伯维、礼来、罗氏、武田、默克、MSDP。顾问或顾问角色:BMS,罗氏,武田,Genmab,艾伯维,Incyte, Regeneron,山德士,y - mab therapeutics其他报酬:研究资助:武田,施维雅;顾问或顾问角色:辉瑞、罗氏、艾伯维、武田、BMS、赛诺菲其他薪酬:研究经费:诺华、赛诺菲。C. chavez顾问或顾问角色:Kite/Gilead、Novartis、Karyopharm、MorphoSys、BeiGene、AbbVie、ADC Therapeutics、BMS、Epizyme、Genentech、BayerHonoraria: Kite/Gilead、Novartis、Karyopharm、MorphoSys、BeiGene、AbbVie、ADC Therapeutics、BMS、Epizyme、Genentech、BayerOther报酬:研究经费:阿斯利康、默克和AdaptiveA。顾问或顾问角色:武田、BMS、诺华、杨森、默沙东、安进、GSK、赛诺菲、Kite、Mundipharma、BluebirdHonoraria:武田、BMS、诺华、杨森、默沙东、安进、GSK、赛诺菲、Kite教育资助:武田、BMS、罗氏其他报酬:研究经费:武田;演讲单位:BMS、诺华、杨森、默沙东、安进、GSK、赛诺菲、KiteH。其他报酬:研究经费:罗氏、阿斯特拉-利康、BMS、Incyte、百济神州、Daiichi Sankyo、礼来、诺华、pharmacyics、ADC Therapeutics、EpizymeR。 CórdobaConsultant或顾问角色:武田、Genmab、BMS、Kite、杨森、Incyte、吉利德、罗氏、阿斯利康、百济神州、礼来、艾伯维、强生;强生、Kyowa kirinaria: Incyte、Gilead、Roche、AstraZeneca、BeiGene、Lilly、AbbVie、Johnson &amp;教育资助:Incyte、Gilead、Roche、AstraZeneca、BeiGene、Lilly、AbbVie、Johnson &amp;演讲机构:武田、BMS、Kite、杨森、罗氏、阿斯利康、艾伯维等。顾问或顾问角色:杨森,礼来,罗氏,百济神州,KiteM。其他报酬:研究支持(支付给机构):BMS、Genentech、Genmab、Incyte、Janssen、Novartis、Roche、TakedaM。Roost clausen顾问或顾问角色:AbbVie、Janssen、Gilead、AstraZeneca、Genmab、Incyte、rochearia: AbbVie、Janssen、Gilead、AstraZeneca、Genmab、Incyte、rochea教育资助:Pfizer、AbbVie、Janssen、AstraZeneca、Genmab、RocheJ。顾问或顾问角色:艾伯维、百济神州、BMS、吉利德/Kite、Incyte、杨森、礼来、密天尼生物医药、诺华、罗氏;其他报酬:研究经费:百济神州;演讲单位:Janss
{"title":"EPCORITAMAB MONOTHERAPY DEMONSTRATES DEEP AND DURABLE RESPONSES AT 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA","authors":"K. M. Linton,&nbsp;J. M. Vose,&nbsp;W. Jurczak,&nbsp;P. J. Lugtenburg,&nbsp;E. Gyan,&nbsp;J. C. Chavez,&nbsp;A. Sureda,&nbsp;J. H. Christensen,&nbsp;H. Tilly,&nbsp;R. Córdoba,&nbsp;D. J. Lewis,&nbsp;M. Hutchings,&nbsp;M. Roost Clausen,&nbsp;J. Sancho,&nbsp;T. Cochrane,&nbsp;S. Leppä,&nbsp;M. E. D. Chamuleau,&nbsp;C. Thieblemont,&nbsp;P. F. Caimi,&nbsp;Y. H. Karimi,&nbsp;C. Andreadis,&nbsp;K. Izutsu,&nbsp;N. Fukuhara,&nbsp;E. Favaro,&nbsp;P. Patah,&nbsp;M. Geybels,&nbsp;I. Altintaş,&nbsp;C. Morehouse,&nbsp;U. Vitolo","doi":"10.1002/hon.70094_240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70094_240","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Epcoritamab (epcor), a subcutaneous (SC) CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody, is approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy (3L+) based on EPCORE NHL-1 FL (NCT03625037; US/EU; Linton KM, et al. &lt;i&gt;Lancet Haem&lt;/i&gt; 2024;11:E593–E605) and NHL-3 FL (NCT04542824; Japan) expansion cohorts (EXP) results. NHL-1 cycle (C) 1 optimization cohort (OPT) implemented a 3-step-up dosing (3-SUD) regimen to support outpatient utilization of epcor in FL. We report 3-y follow-up (FU) from EXP and updated OPT results for epcor monotherapy in patients (pts) with 3L+ FL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; Pts with CD20+ R/R FL grade[G] 1–3A and ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic treatment (tx) received SC epcor in 28-d Cs until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. NHL-1 (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 128) and NHL-3 (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 21) EXP were pooled for diversity; OPT is reported separately. For EXP, the primary endpoint was efficacy; secondary endpoints were minimal residual disease (ClonoSeq®) negativity and safety. Due to the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pts from EXP, sensitivity analyses with conservative adjustment for COVID-19 deaths were conducted for efficacy. For OPT, the primary endpoint was incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS); secondary endpoints were response rates and safety.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; As of Dec 2024, median FU was 35 mo and 15.5 mo and median duration of tx was 9.7 mo and 11.4 mo in EXP(&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 149) and OPT(&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 86), respectively. Across cohorts, pts were heavily pretreated (median 3 prior lines) and had high-risk R/R FL features. In the pooled EXP, overall response rate (ORR) was 84.6% and complete response rate (CRR) was 67.1% (Table).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With longer-term FU, safety from EXP was generally consistent with previous reports. In EXP, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic peak, 34.9% of pts had G3–4 infections (18.1% COVID-19) and 7.4% had G5 events (5.4% COVID-19). 28% of pts discontinued (d/c) tx due to tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 12.1% COVID-19). G3 or higher infections were reported in 14.3% of pts on ≥ 2y of tx (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 35).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In OPT, updated ORR/CRR were 91.9%/73.3%; time-to-event endpoint data were still maturing, with most pts alive (93%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With additional FU, safety from OPT remained unchanged from prior reports of only low-grade CRS (39.5% G1 and 9.3% G2) and no immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). In OPT, conducted post COVID-19 pandemic peak, 20.9% of pts had G3–4 infections (7.0% COVID-19, all G3); 1 pt had G5 TEAE of viral respiratory tract infection. TEAEs leading to tx d/c occurred in 11% (1.2% COVID).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Epcor monotherapy demonstrated deep and durable responses and manageable safety with no new safety signals at 3y in a large and diversified 3L+ FL global population. OPT cohort results show response rates consistent with those in EXP and confirm the favorable safety profi","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 S3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70094_240","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Hematological Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1