Pier Luigi Zinzani, Giulia Dell’Omo, Letizia Fusco, Ilaria Peduto, Carlotta Galeone, Federica Cavallo, Giuseppe Gritti
<p>Compassionate Use Programs (CUP) offers patients with severe diseases, early access to promising new drugs outside of clinical trial and prior to marketing approval. Data arising from CUP provides valuable insights on treatment pathways. In the last few years, the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has rapidly evolved based on the approval of several novel therapies, resulting in changing treatment patterns which benefit from assessment of modern retrospective data.</p><p>To address this, we retrospectively evaluated data of two large patient cohorts of r/r DLBCL within the polatuzumab vedotin and glofitamab Roche Global CUP opened in Italy [<span>1</span>], as was done in similar studies from other European countries [<span>2, 3</span>]. In fact, this analysis did not evaluate the effectiveness of the two products, that has been recently reported for polatuzumab vedotin [<span>4</span>].</p><p>The polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab +/− bendamustine CUP cohort included r/r DLBCL patients after at least 2 lines of treatment; with 208 patient requests received from 92 national centers between May 2019 and April 2020. The glofitamab CUP cohort included patients with r/r DLBCL, high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) or primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) after at least 3 lines of previous treatments; with 145 patient requests received from 59 national centers between March 2022 and April 2024. Cohort characteristics were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical data, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data.</p><p>Clinical characteristics of the patient population are summarized in Table 1. Both cohorts showed a prevalence of males. The median age (minimum-maximum range) at diagnosis was higher in the polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab +/− bendamustine cohort (63 years; range: 24–84 years) compared to the glofitamab cohort (60 years; range: 17–82 years, <i>p</i>-value = 0.002). Similarly, the median age at CUP request was higher in the polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab +/− bendamustine (67 years; range: 25–85 years) than in the glofitamab cohort (62 years; range: 19–85 years, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001). The median duration from diagnosis to CUP request was comparable in the two cohorts (median 2 years, range 0–22). In the polatuzumab vedotin cohort, 78% patients were previously treated with 2 (49%) or 3 (29%) lines of treatment, whereas the glofitamab cohort had 79% of patients previously treated with 3 (34%) or 4 (45%) lines of treatment (<i>p</i>-value = 0.004).</p><p>Treatment courses experienced by patients across the two cohorts are depicted in Figure 1. In the polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab +/− bendamustine cohort (Figure 1A), the most frequent frontline regimen was R-CHOP (66%), followed by R-CHOP like (e.g., R-COMP, R-COMP + rituximab, R-BENDA, etc; 23%) and by R-CHOP dose-dense chemotherapy (e.g., DA-EPOCH-R, MACOP-B, etc; 10%). The corresponding distribution
{"title":"Polatuzumab Vedotin and Glofitamab for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Compassionate Use Program in Italy","authors":"Pier Luigi Zinzani, Giulia Dell’Omo, Letizia Fusco, Ilaria Peduto, Carlotta Galeone, Federica Cavallo, Giuseppe Gritti","doi":"10.1002/hon.70161","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hon.70161","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Compassionate Use Programs (CUP) offers patients with severe diseases, early access to promising new drugs outside of clinical trial and prior to marketing approval. Data arising from CUP provides valuable insights on treatment pathways. In the last few years, the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has rapidly evolved based on the approval of several novel therapies, resulting in changing treatment patterns which benefit from assessment of modern retrospective data.</p><p>To address this, we retrospectively evaluated data of two large patient cohorts of r/r DLBCL within the polatuzumab vedotin and glofitamab Roche Global CUP opened in Italy [<span>1</span>], as was done in similar studies from other European countries [<span>2, 3</span>]. In fact, this analysis did not evaluate the effectiveness of the two products, that has been recently reported for polatuzumab vedotin [<span>4</span>].</p><p>The polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab +/− bendamustine CUP cohort included r/r DLBCL patients after at least 2 lines of treatment; with 208 patient requests received from 92 national centers between May 2019 and April 2020. The glofitamab CUP cohort included patients with r/r DLBCL, high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) or primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) after at least 3 lines of previous treatments; with 145 patient requests received from 59 national centers between March 2022 and April 2024. Cohort characteristics were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical data, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous data.</p><p>Clinical characteristics of the patient population are summarized in Table 1. Both cohorts showed a prevalence of males. The median age (minimum-maximum range) at diagnosis was higher in the polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab +/− bendamustine cohort (63 years; range: 24–84 years) compared to the glofitamab cohort (60 years; range: 17–82 years, <i>p</i>-value = 0.002). Similarly, the median age at CUP request was higher in the polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab +/− bendamustine (67 years; range: 25–85 years) than in the glofitamab cohort (62 years; range: 19–85 years, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001). The median duration from diagnosis to CUP request was comparable in the two cohorts (median 2 years, range 0–22). In the polatuzumab vedotin cohort, 78% patients were previously treated with 2 (49%) or 3 (29%) lines of treatment, whereas the glofitamab cohort had 79% of patients previously treated with 3 (34%) or 4 (45%) lines of treatment (<i>p</i>-value = 0.004).</p><p>Treatment courses experienced by patients across the two cohorts are depicted in Figure 1. In the polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab +/− bendamustine cohort (Figure 1A), the most frequent frontline regimen was R-CHOP (66%), followed by R-CHOP like (e.g., R-COMP, R-COMP + rituximab, R-BENDA, etc; 23%) and by R-CHOP dose-dense chemotherapy (e.g., DA-EPOCH-R, MACOP-B, etc; 10%). The corresponding distribution ","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12703129/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145756226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pinto, Antonio, Carmelo Carlo-Stella, Monia Marchetti, et al. 2025. “Defining and Addressing the Current Unmet Medical Needs for the Frontline Treatment of Advanced Stage Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Perspective From an Ad Hoc Panel of Italian Experts,” Hematological Oncology 43: e70152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70152.
In the article, there were errors in the author byline and Figure 3.
In the author byline, the author name “Marco Laddetto” was incorrect and should be “Marco Ladetto”.
Figure 3 was not the final version and should have been updated with the new figure as shown below.
{"title":"Correction to “Defining and Addressing the Current Unmet Medical Needs for the Frontline Treatment of Advanced Stage Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Perspective From an Ad Hoc Panel of Italian Experts”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/hon.70158","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hon.70158","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pinto, Antonio, Carmelo Carlo-Stella, Monia Marchetti, et al. 2025. “Defining and Addressing the Current Unmet Medical Needs for the Frontline Treatment of Advanced Stage Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Perspective From an Ad Hoc Panel of Italian Experts,” <i>Hematological Oncology</i> 43: e70152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70152.</p><p>In the article, there were errors in the author byline and Figure 3.</p><p>In the author byline, the author name “Marco Laddetto” was incorrect and should be “Marco Ladetto”.</p><p>Figure 3 was not the final version and should have been updated with the new figure as shown below.</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70158","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145742525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Livia Donzelli, Veronica Zullino, Giovanni Fernando Torelli, Maria Stefania De Propris, Mario Piazzolla, Franco Ruberto, Maurizio Martelli, Alice Di Rocco
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies have revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies, achieving high response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Despite these benefits, CAR-T cell therapies are associated with unique toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), immune cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT), and immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS), which is characterized by a rare and life-threatening hyperinflammatory response. This paper presents a case of a 56-year-old woman with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with the CAR-T cell therapy, brexucabtagene autoleucel, who had subsequently developed CRS and later IEC-HS. Initial management included tocilizumab, corticosteroids, and anakinra, followed by the compassionate use of emapalumab, an interferon-γ blocker. To provide broader context, we conducted a literature review of CAR-T cell-related toxicities, focusing on IEC-HS and its management with emapalumab. Clinical and laboratory manifestations, such as elevated ferritin levels, cytopenias, and organ dysfunction, underpin the diagnostic criteria for IEC-HS. Vigilant monitoring and tailored therapeutic approaches are required to effectively manage toxicities associated with CAR-T cell therapy, to maximize its benefits and minimize adverse effects. In more severe IEC-HS cases, emapalumab may be used as an effective targeted therapy.
{"title":"Managing Treatment-Emergent Immune Effector Cell-Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis-Like Syndrome Following CAR-T Cell Therapy: A Case-Based Review of the use of Emapalumab","authors":"Livia Donzelli, Veronica Zullino, Giovanni Fernando Torelli, Maria Stefania De Propris, Mario Piazzolla, Franco Ruberto, Maurizio Martelli, Alice Di Rocco","doi":"10.1002/hon.70157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70157","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies have revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies, achieving high response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Despite these benefits, CAR-T cell therapies are associated with unique toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), immune cell-associated hematotoxicity (ICAHT), and immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS), which is characterized by a rare and life-threatening hyperinflammatory response. This paper presents a case of a 56-year-old woman with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with the CAR-T cell therapy, brexucabtagene autoleucel, who had subsequently developed CRS and later IEC-HS. Initial management included tocilizumab, corticosteroids, and anakinra, followed by the compassionate use of emapalumab, an interferon-γ blocker. To provide broader context, we conducted a literature review of CAR-T cell-related toxicities, focusing on IEC-HS and its management with emapalumab. Clinical and laboratory manifestations, such as elevated ferritin levels, cytopenias, and organ dysfunction, underpin the diagnostic criteria for IEC-HS. Vigilant monitoring and tailored therapeutic approaches are required to effectively manage toxicities associated with CAR-T cell therapy, to maximize its benefits and minimize adverse effects. In more severe IEC-HS cases, emapalumab may be used as an effective targeted therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hon.70157","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145626819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Delia, D. Lazzarotto, S. Imbergamo, F. Mosna, C. Papayannidis, C. Pasciolla, A. Mulè, N. Fracchiolla, M. Leoncin, M. I. Del Principe, M. Fumagalli, M. Olivi, F. Guolo, M. Lunghi, M. De Gobbi, F. Lussana, L. Santoro, L. Aprile, P. Zappasodi, M. Ciccone, F. Giglio, V. P. Gagliardi, M. Dargenio, A. Curti, M. Bonifacio, S. Chiaretti, P. Musto, R. Foà, A. Candoni