Hepatology International最新文献

Background and aims: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)-related fibrosis is reversible. However, the dynamic morphology change in fibrosis regression remains unclear. We aim to explore the morphological characteristics of fibrosis regression in advanced MASH patients.

Methods: Clinical and histological data of 79 biopsy-proved MASH patients with advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) were reviewed. The second harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence (SHG/TPEF) image technology was used to quantitatively identify the R (regressive) septa from P (progressive) septa and PS (perisinusoidal) fibrosis. Non-invasive tests were used to compare the fibrosis level with and without R septa groups. Transcriptomics was used to explore hub genes and the underlying mechanism of the formation of R septa.

Results: The R septa were different from the P septa and PS fibrosis in detail collagen quantitation identified by SHG/TPEF technology. The R septa were found in MASH fibrosis-regressed patients, which met the definition of the "Beijing classification". Therefore, patients were divided into two groups according to septa morphology: with R septa (n = 10, 12.7%), and without R septa (n = 69, 87.3%). Patients with R septa had lower values in most non-invasive tests, especially for liver stiffness assessed by TE (12.3 vs. 19.4 kPa, p = 0.010) and FAST (FibroScan®-AST) score (0.43 vs. 0.70, p = 0.003). Transcriptomics analysis showed that the expressions of five hub fibrogenic genes, including Col3A1, BGN, Col4A1, THBS2, and Col4A2 in the R septa group, were significantly lower.

Conclusions: The R septa can be differentiated from the P septa and PS fibrosis by quantitative assessment of SHG/TPEF, and it represents a tendency of fibrosis regression in MASH patients.

Trial registration: NCT03386890, 29/12/2017.

Background & aims: Despite increasing knowledge regarding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of liver fibrogenesis, there is currently no approved drug for the treatment of liver fibrosis. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent progenitor cells representing an attractive therapeutic tool for tissue damage and inflammation. This study was designed to determine the protective effect and underlying mechanism of human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) on thioacetamide-induced liver fibrosis.

Methods: Liver fibrosis was induced in mice by intraperitoneal injection of thioacetamide (TAA). Some mice were then given injection of UC-MSCs or UC-MSCs-derived exosomes (UC-MSCs-Exo) via the tail vein. Liver tissues were collected for histologic analysis.

Results: We found that administration of UC-MSCs significantly reduced serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, and attenuated hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Moreover, the therapeutic effect of UC-MSCs-derived exosomes was similar to that of UC-MSCs. Intriguingly, UC-MSCs-Exo treatment downregulated the expression of smoothened (SMO), a fundamental component of Hedgehog signaling which plays a critical role in fibrogenesis, and subsequently inhibited the activation of hepatic stellate cells, a central driver of fibrosis in experimental and human liver injury. Furthermore, the anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects of UCMSCs- Exo was reversed by the SMO agonist SAG treatment in mice.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that UC-MSCs-Exo exert therapeutic effects on liver fibrosis, at least in part, through inhibiting the Hedgehog/SMO signaling pathway.

Background: CXCR6+CD8+T cells have been implicated in the pathogenesis of various liver and autoimmune diseases. However, their involvement in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has not been elucidated.

Methods: We used immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry to quantify CXCR6+CD8+T cells in hepatic tissue and peripheral blood samples obtained from CXCR6+CD8+T cells obtained from PBC patients. Then, we performed comprehensive statistical analyses to access the correlation between the abundance of these cells and clinical as well as pathological data across different stages of PBC.

Results: Our research revealed that CXCR6+ cell frequencies in CD3+CD8+T cells from PBC patients significantly exceeded that of healthy controls (HCs) (2.24 vs. 0.61%, p < 0.01). A similar pattern emerged for hepatic CXCR6+CD8+T cell counts, which were notably higher in the PBC cohort compared to HCs. Our cohort consisted of 118 PBC patients, categorized into 62 early-stage (E-PBC) and 56 late-stage (L-PBC) cases. Notably, significant disparities existed between these groups in terms of liver enzyme and lipid profile levels (p < 0.05), with no notable differences observed in gender, age, blood counts, cholesterol levels, or autoantibodies (p > 0.05). Intriguingly, the quantity of hepatic CXCR6+CD8+T cells per high power field (HPF) was significantly elevated in both E-PBC and L-PBC patients as opposed to normal liver samples, indicating a substantial increase in these cells across all stages of PBC (p = 0.000). Spearman's rank correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between CXCR6+CD8+T cell counts and serum levels of Alkaline Phosphatase (AKP) and Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), ANA, IgG and IgM, while revealing a negligible correlation with Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST). Subsequent findings indicated significant variances in CXCR6+ cell numbers not only among different PBC stages but also across various degrees of inflammation and fibrosis (p ≤ 0.007). In a follow-up study post-Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) treatment, stark differences were identified in biochemical and immunohistochemical profiles between responder (31 patients) and non-responder (33 patients) groups (p < 0.05). A Wilcoxon rank-sum test further demonstrated a significant difference in the level of hepatic CXCR6+CD8+T cells between these two response groups (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: CXCR6+CD8+T cells play a vital role in the pathogenesis of PBC, exhibiting correlations with the extent of inflammation, staging of liver fibrosis, and response to pharmacological interventions in PBC patients.

Acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) occurs in 22-43% of all AIH cases, and is not a rare condition. Rather than constituting a single disease entity, it represents a clinical spectrum characterized by considerable variability in severity and the presence of preexisting chronic AIH. This spectrum ranges from acute AIH and acute severe AIH to AIH presenting as acute liver failure (ALF) or as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), contingent upon factors such as coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, and underlying liver disease. Diagnosing acute presentation of AIH can be particularly challenging due to the frequent absence of classical serologic signatures such as autoantibodies and elevated IgG levels. Histopathological examination remains essential for diagnosis, typically necessitating percutaneous or transjugular liver biopsy. Corticosteroids (CS) are recommended for the management of acute AIH and acute severe AIH with coagulopathy. However, the therapeutic response to CS should be meticulously monitored. If a poor response is anticipated, liver transplantation (LT) should be promptly considered. For AIH presenting as ALF with encephalopathy or ACLF with advanced underlying liver disease, LT is generally advised. Nonetheless, there is potential for a trial of CS therapy in cases of ALF with low MELD scores or ACLF without encephalopathy. This review provides an overview of the latest findings concerning the definition, diagnosis, and management of acute presentation of AIH.

Background: This study conducted molecular subtyping of biliary tract cancer patients based on 19 PANoptosis-related gene signatures.

Methods: Through consensus clustering, patients were categorized into two subtypes, A and B. By integrating multi-omics data and clinical information from different cohorts, we elucidated the association between different subtypes of biliary tract cancer and patient prognosis, which correlated with the immune infiltration characteristics of patients.

Results: LASSO regression analysis was performed on the 19 gene signatures, and we constructed and validated a 9-gene risk score prognostic model that accurately predicts the overall survival rate of different biliary tract cancer patients. Additionally, we developed a predictive nomogram demonstrating the clinical utility and robustness of our model. Further analysis of the risk score-based immune landscape highlighted potential associations with immune cell infiltration, chemotherapy, and immune therapy response.

Conclusion: Our study provides valuable insights into personalized treatment strategies for biliary tract cancer, which are crucial for improving patient prognosis and guiding treatment decisions in clinical practice.

Background and aims: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is present in lean people. However, the magnitude of the prognostic hepatic and cardiovascular risk in these patients compared to non-lean counterparts remains unclear. We aimed to investigate this topic, and to explore whether these risks change based on factors related to NAFLD severity.

Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for cohort studies (published through April 2024) that evaluated liver and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in lean and non-lean individuals with NAFLD and reported unadjusted or adjusted data. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) or hazard ratios (HRs) using a random-effects modeling and performed subgroup and meta-regressions analyses.

Results: We identified 22 studies with over 1 million NAFLD patients (13.0% were lean). Lean NAFLD showed a similar risk of liver-related events in unadjusted analysis (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.49, I² = 31%), but a higher risk in adjusted analysis (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17-2.36, I² = 83%) compared to non-lean NAFLD. Lean NAFLD had a higher risk of liver-related mortality (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.57-3.15, I² = 0%; HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.14-4.51, I² = 0%). For CV outcomes, lean NAFLD had a lower risk of any cardiovascular disease in unadjusted analysis (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.95, I² = 88%), but similar risk in adjusted analysis (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.02, I² = 78%), and similar risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71-1.66, I² = 85%; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.78, I² = 46%) compared to non-lean NAFLD.

Conclusions: Lean NAFLD patients have worse liver outcomes, but similar CV outcomes compared to non-lean NAFLD patients, highlighting the importance of monitoring both groups closely.

Background: With the implementation of the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and the publication of the metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) nomenclature in 2020, it is important to establish consensus for the coding of MAFLD in ICD-11. This will inform subsequent revisions of ICD-11.

Methods: Using the Qualtrics XM and WJX platforms, questionnaires were sent online to MAFLD-ICD-11 coding collaborators, authors of papers, and relevant association members.

Results: A total of 890 international experts in various fields from 61 countries responded to the survey. We also achieved full coverage of provincial-level administrative regions in China. 77.1% of respondents agreed that MAFLD should be represented in ICD-11 by updating NAFLD, with no significant regional differences (77.3% in Asia and 76.6% in non-Asia, p = 0.819). Over 80% of respondents agreed or somewhat agreed with the need to assign specific codes for progressive stages of MAFLD (i.e. steatohepatitis) (92.2%), MAFLD combined with comorbidities (84.1%), or MAFLD subtypes (i.e., lean, overweight/obese, and diabetic) (86.1%).

Conclusions: This global survey by a collaborative panel of clinical, coding, health management and policy experts, indicates agreement that MAFLD should be coded in ICD-11. The data serves as a foundation for corresponding adjustments in the ICD-11 revision.

Background: Evidence concerning long-term outcome of robotic liver resection (RLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is scarce.

Methods: This study enrolled all patients who underwent RLR and LLR for resectable HCC between July 2016 and July 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to create a 1:3 match between the RLR and LLR groups. A comprehensive collection and analysis of patient data regarding efficacy and safety have been conducted, along with the evaluation of the learning curve for RLR.

Results: Following PSM, a total of 341 patients were included, with 97 in the RLR group and 244 in the LLR group. RLR group demonstrated a significantly longer operative time (median [IQR], 210 [152.0-298.0] min vs. 183.5 [132.3-263.5] min; p = 0.04), with no significant differences in other perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was similar between the two groups (p = 0.43), but RLR group exhibited improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median of 65 months vs. 56 months, p = 0.006). The estimated 5-year OS for RLR and LLR were 74.8% (95% CI: 65.4-85.6%) and 80.7% (95% CI: 74.0-88.1%), respectively. The estimated 5-year RFS for RLR and LLR were 58.6% (95% CI: 48.6-70.6%) and 38.3% (95% CI: 26.4-55.9%), respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, RLR (HR: 0.586, 95% CI (0.393-0.874), p = 0.008) emerged as an independent predictor of reducing recurrence rates and enhanced RFS. The operative learning curve indicates that approximately after the 11th case, the learning curve of RLR stabilized and entered a proficient phase.

Conclusions: OS was comparable between RLR and LLR, and while RFS was improved in the RLR group. RLR demonstrates oncological effectiveness and safety for resectable HCC.