Heart Failure Reviews最新文献

Left atrium (LA) is a very important component of cardiovascular performance. The assessment of LA function has gathered the interest with expanding research supporting the utility as a biomarker for outcomes in heart failure (HF). Echocardiography is the main imaging modality which helps in a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the LA size and function. Recent advances in probe technology and software analysis have provided a better understanding of LA anatomy, physiology, pathology, and function. A variety of parameters have been defined as markers of LA function but there is no single parameter that best defines LA function. Speckle tracking echocardiography–derived analysis of LA deformation provides a window on all phases of LA function (reservoir, conduit, and booster pump). There is accumulative published data that supported the diagnostic and prognostic values of LA deformation integration during echo assessment of LA in HF. This review article summarized the clinical utility of LA deformation that may help in prediction, diagnosis, categorization, risk stratification, and guiding the proper selection of therapy in HF patients in daily practice.

To date, studies on the prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have not been summarized and analyzed as a whole. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF. The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched from dates of inception until May 1, 2023. The primary outcome was the prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF, and values of CMD prevalence were pooled using a random-effects model. In total, 10 studies involving 1267 patients, including 822 with HFpEF and 445 without HFpEF, were included. The pooled prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF was 71% (95% CI, 0.63-0.79). In the subgroup analysis, the prevalence of CMD was 79% (95% CI, 0.71-0.87) by invasive measurement and 66% (95% CI, 0.54-0.77) by noninvasive measurement and 67% (95% CI, 0.52-0.82) with CFR < 2.0 and 75.0% (95% CI, 0.71-0.79) with CFR < 2.5. The prevalence of endothelium-independent CMD and endothelium-dependent CMD was 62% (95% CI, 0.53-0.72) and 50% (95% CI, 0.19-0.81), respectively. The prevalence of CMD was 74% (95% CI = 0.69-0.79) and 66% (95% CI = 0.41-0.90) in prospective and retrospective studies, respectively. Compared with the control group, patients with HFpEF had a significantly lower CFR (MD =  - 1.28, 95% CI =  - 1.82 to - 0.74, P < 0.01) and a higher prevalence of CMD (RR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.52 to 3.20, P < 0.01). Qualitative analysis demonstrated that CMD might be associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. In conclusion, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the prevalence of CMD in patients with HFpEF. Our study demonstrates that CMD is common in patients with HFpEF and might be associated with poor clinical outcomes in these patients. Clinicians should attach importance to CMD in the diagnosis and treatment of HFpEF. The number of studies in this field is relatively small. Therefore, more high-quality studies are needed to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of CMD and the potential role of CMD as a therapeutic target in patients with HFpEF.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a serious public health concern whose incidence has been on a rise and is projected by the World Health Organization to be the leading global cause of mortality by 2030. Heart failure (HF) is a complicated syndrome resulting from various CVDs of heterogeneous etiologies and exhibits varying pathophysiology, including activation of inflammatory signaling cascade, apoptosis, fibrotic pathway, and neuro-humoral system, thereby leading to compromised cardiac function. During this process, several biomolecules involved in the onset and progression of HF are released into circulation. These circulating biomolecules could serve as unique biomarkers for the detection of subclinical changes and can be utilized for monitoring disease severity. Hence, it is imperative to identify these biomarkers to devise an early predictive strategy to stop the deterioration of cardiac function caused by these complex cellular events. Furthermore, measurement of multiple biomarkers allows clinicians to divide HF patients into sub-groups for treatment and management based on early health outcomes. The present article provides a comprehensive overview of current omics platform available for discovering biomarkers for HF management. Some of the existing and novel biomarkers for the early detection of HF with special reference to endothelial biology are also discussed.

Several attempts have been made, by the scientific community, to develop a unifying hypothesis that explains the clinical syndrome of heart failure (HF). The currently widely accepted neurohormonal model has substituted the cardiorenal and the cardiocirculatory models, which focused on salt-water retention and low cardiac output/peripheral vasoconstriction, respectively. According to the neurohormonal model, HF with eccentric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) (systolic HF or HF with reduced LV ejection fraction [LVEF] or HFrEF) develops and progresses because endogenous neurohormonal systems, predominantly the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), exhibit prolonged activation following the initial heart injury exerting deleterious hemodynamic and direct nonhemodynamic cardiovascular effects. However, there is evidence to suggest that SNS overactivity often preexists HF development due to its association with HF risk factors, is also present in HF with preserved LVEF (diastolic HF or HFpEF), and that it is linked to immune/inflammatory factors. Furthermore, SNS activity in HF may be augmented by coexisting noncardiac morbidities and modified by genetic factors and demographics. The purpose of this paper is to provide a contemporary overview of the complex associations between SNS overactivity and the development and progression of HF, summarize the underlying mechanisms, and discuss the clinical implications as they relate to therapeutic interventions mitigating SNS overactivity.

Heart failure (HF) is a progressive condition with a clinical picture resulting from reduced cardiac output (CO) and/or elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressures (LVFP). The original Diamond-Forrester classification, based on haemodynamic data reflecting CO and pulmonary congestion, was introduced to grade severity, manage, and risk stratify advanced HF patients, providing evidence that survival progressively worsened for those classified as warm/dry, cold/dry, warm/wet, and cold/wet. Invasive haemodynamic evaluation in critically ill patients has been replaced by non-invasive haemodynamic phenotype profiling using echocardiography. Decreased CO is not infrequent among ambulatory HF patients with reduced ejection fraction, ranging from 23 to 45%. The Diamond-Forrester classification may be used in combination with the evaluation of natriuretic peptides (NPs) in ambulatory HF patients to pursue the goal of early identification of those at high risk of adverse events and personalise therapy to antagonise neurohormonal systems, reduce congestion, and preserve tissue/renal perfusion. The most benefit of the Guideline-directed medical treatment is to be expected in stable patients with the warm/dry profile, who more often respond with LV reverse remodelling, while more selective individualised treatments guided by echocardiography and NPs are necessary for patients with persisting congestion and/or tissue/renal hypoperfusion (cold/dry, warm/wet, and cold/wet phenotypes) to achieve stabilization and to avoid further neurohormonal activation, as a result of inappropriate use of vasodilating or negative chronotropic drugs, thus pursuing the therapeutic objectives. Therefore, tracking the haemodynamic status over time by clinical, imaging, and laboratory indicators helps implement therapy by individualising drug regimens and interventions according to patients' phenotypes even in an ambulatory setting.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy or stress cardiomyopathy (SCM), was first described in 1990 and initially, it was thought to be only associated with short-term complications and mortality with a benign long-term prognosis comparable to a healthy population. However recent investigations have proven otherwise and have shown SCM patients might have comparable long-term morbidity and mortality to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Many emotional, or physical stressors can trigger SCM, and have been able to describe an interplay of neurohormonal and inflammatory mechanisms as the pathophysiology of this disease. Additionally, given the significantly higher prevalence of SCM in post-menopausal women, estrogen levels have been thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Furthermore, there is an elusive disparity in prognosis depending upon different triggers. Currently, many questions remain unanswered regarding the long-term management of these patients to reduce morbidity, mortality, and improve quality of life, such as the need for long-term anticoagulation. In this paper, we review the findings of most recent published investigations regarding etiologies, pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, prognosis, short-term and in more detail, long-term complications of SCM. Finally, we will discuss what future research is needed to learn more about this disease to improve the long-term prognosis, even though as of now, data for long-term management is still lacking.

Cardiomyopathies are myocardial diseases characterized by mechanical and electrical dysfunction of the heart muscle which could lead to heart failure and life-threatening arrhythmias. Certainly, an accurate anamnesis, a meticulous physical examination, and an ECG are cornerstones in raising the diagnostic suspicion. However, cardiovascular imaging techniques are indispensable to diagnose a specific cardiomyopathy, to stratify the risk related to the disease and even to track the response to the therapy. Echocardiography is often the first exam that the patient undergoes, because of its non-invasiveness, wide availability, and cost-effectiveness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging allows to integrate and implement the information obtained with the echography. Furthermore, cardiomyopathies' genetic basis has been investigated over the years and the list of genetic mutations deemed potentially pathogenic is expected to grow further. The aim of this review is to show echocardiographic, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and genetic features of several cardiomyopathies: dilated cardiomyopathy (DMC), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC), myocarditis, and takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

As a slowly progressive form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), Anderson-Fabry disease (FD) resembles the phenotype of the most common sarcomeric forms, although significant differences in presentation and long-term progression may help determine the correct diagnosis. A variety of electrocardiographic and imaging features of FD cardiomyopathy have been described at different times in the course of the disease, and considerable discrepancies remain regarding the assessment of disease severity by individual physicians. Therefore, we here propose a practical staging of FD cardiomyopathy, in hopes it may represent the standard for cardiac evaluation and facilitate communication between specialized FD centres and primary care physicians. We identified 4 main stages of FD cardiomyopathy of increasing severity, based on available evidence from clinical and imaging studies: non-hypertrophic, hypertrophic - pre-fibrotic, hypertrophic - fibrotic, and overt dysfunction. Each stage is described and discussed in detail, following the principle that speaking a common language is critical when managing such complex patients in a multi-disciplinary and sometimes multi-centre setting.

Heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are two pathological conditions with a high prevalence in the general population. When they coexist in the same patient, a strict interplay between them is observed, such that patients affected require a clinical multidisciplinary and personalized management. The diagnosis of HF and CKD relies on signs and symptoms of the patient but several additional tools, such as blood-based biomarkers and imaging techniques, are needed to clarify and discriminate the main characteristics of these diseases. Improved survival due to new recommended drugs in HF has increasingly challenged physicians to manage patients with multiple diseases, especially in case of CKD. However, the safe administration of these drugs in patients with HF and CKD is often challenging. Knowing up to which values ​​of creatinine or renal clearance each drug can be administered is fundamental. With this review we sought to give an insight on this sizable and complex topic, in order to get clearer ideas and a more precise reference about the diagnostic assessment and therapeutic management of HF and CKD.