Haematologica最新文献

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are in standard clinical use to treat relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Owing to the rapidly progressing field of CAR T-cell therapy and the lack of generally accepted treatment guidelines, we hypothesized significant differences between European centers in prevention, diagnosis and management of short- and long-term complications. To capture the current CAR T-cell management among European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) centers and to determine the medical need and specific areas for future clinical research the EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party performed a survey among 227 EBMT CAR T-cell centers. We received complete servey answers from 106 centers (47%) addressing questions in the areas of product selection, CAR T-cell logistics, management of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome as well as management in later phases including prolonged cytopenias. We identified common patterns in complication management, but also significant variety in clinical management of the centers in important aspects. Our results demonstrate a high medical need for treatment harmonization and future clinical research in the following areas: treatment of steroid-refractory and very severe cytokine release syndrome/neurotoxicity, treatment of cytopenia, early discharge and outpatient management, as well as immunoglobulin substitution.

Patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience dismal outcomes. We performed a comprehensive analysis of patients with relapsed AML to determine the genetic dynamics and factors predicting survival. We analyzed 875 patients with newly diagnosed AML who received intensive treatment or low-intensity treatment. Of these patients, 197 subsequently relapsed. Data were available for 164 of these patients, with a median time from complete remission/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery to relapse of 6.5 months. Thirty-five of the 164 patients (21%) experienced relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. At relapse, mutations in genes involved in pathway signaling tended to disappear, whereas clonal hematopoiesis-related mutations or TP53 tended to persist. Patients with normal karyotypes tended to acquire cytogenetic abnormalities at relapse. Patients treated intensively had a higher rate of emergence of TP53 mutations (16%), compared to patients given low-intensity treatment (1%, P=0.009). The overall response rates were 38% and 35% for patients treated with salvage intensive treatment or low-intensity treatment, respectively. Seventeen patients (10%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation after salvage therapy. The median overall survival duration after relapse was 5.3 months, with a 1-year overall survival rate of 17.6%. Complex karyotype (hazard ratio [HR]=2.14, P<0.001), a KMT2A rearrangement (HR=3.52, P=0.011), time in remission <12 months (HR=1.71, P=0.011), and an elevated white blood cell count at relapse (HR=2.38, P=0.005) were independent risk factors for overall survival duration. More effective frontline and maintenance therapies are warranted to prevent relapsed AML.

While there is clear evidence to suggest poorer outcome associated with multi-hit (MH) TP53 mutation (TP53MT) compared to a single-hit (SH) mutation in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), data are conflicting in both higher-risk MDS and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We conducted an in-depth analysis utilizing data from ten US academic institutions to study differences in molecular characteristics and outcomes of SH (N=139) versus MH (N=243) TP53MT AML. Complex cytogenetics were more common in MH than in SH TP53MT AML (P<0.001); whereas ASXL1 (P<0.001), RAS (P<0.001), splicing factor (P=0.003), IDH1/2 (P=0.001), FLT3 ITD (P<0.001) and NPM1 (P=0.005) mutations clustered significantly with SH TP53MT AML. Survival after excluding patients who received best supportive care alone was dismal but not significantly different between patients with SH or MH disease (event-free survival: 3.0 vs. 2.20 months, respectively, P=0.22; overall survival: 8.50 vs. 7.53 months, respectively, P=0.13). In multivariable analysis, IDH1 mutation and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a time-dependent covariate were associated with superior event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=0.44, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.19-1.01, P=0.05 and HR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.18-0.62, P<0.001) and overall survival (HR=0.24, 95% CI: 0.08-0.71, P=0.01 and HR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.16-0.47, P<0.001). Complex cytogenetics (HR=1.56, 95% CI: 1.01-2.40, P=0.04) retained an unfavorable significance for overall survival. Our analysis suggests that MH TP53MT is less relevant in independently predicting outcomes in patients with AML than in those with MDS.

Recent updates have detailed how patients with nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) may be better risk stratified using prognostic scoring systems. Most patients with NLPHL present with early-stage disease and have an indolent disease course. To reflect these differences from classic Hodgkin lymphoma, nomenclature has been updated to recognize nodular lymphocyte-predominant B-cell lymphoma as an alternative to NLPHL. The Global NLPHL One Working Group have published their pivotal dataset in 2024 which challenges the prognostic significance of variant immunoarchitectural (IAP) patterns and proposes a new prognostic scoring system. Key identified prognostic factors include age >45 years, stage III-IV disease, hemoglobin <10.5 g/dL and splenic involvement. After multivariate analysis, variant IAP was not shown to be associated with inferior outcome. As most patients with NLPHL have excellent long-term survival, identifying patients where treatment de-escalation is appropriate will help to minimize toxicity. De-escalation strategies include observation after fully resected stage I disease, active surveillance, anti-CD20 antibody monotherapy, radiotherapy in early-stage disease, and avoiding anthracycline- or bleomycin-containing chemotherapy regimens. Evidence supporting the use of novel therapies remains limited with disappointing results from a recently published study of ibrutinib in patients with relapsed NLPHL. Hopefully, future trials will investigate novel agents such as checkpoint inhibitors, T-cell engaging antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.