Pub Date : 2022-09-29DOI: 10.26650/iuitd.2022.1053317
Adalet Çakır Çağlı
Sufi letters have maintained their literary importance from the formation of the Sufi writing tradition to the present day. In the 10 th century, al-Sarraj drew attention to the importance of letters and recommended reading Sufis’ letters in order to become familiar with their language. Sufis were prompted to write letters for natural reason such as distance and safety. The addressees of the letters were sometimes Sufis and other times the ulama with whom they would correspond for defending or exchanging ideas, and sometimes the statements requested advice or served as a warning. The letters the murshids wrote to their followers on navigating their sülûk [spiritual path] are of great importance in terms of illuminating the history of a tariqa [Sufi school/order], such as in the formation and continuance of a tradition, as well as explaining the intricacies of the science of sülûk . Mehmed Ali Yitik ABSTRACT Sufi works started being written in the 10th century and conveyed the written and verbal knowledge of previous centuries. Sufi correspondence has an important place in written knowledge. Al-Sarraj and al-Hargushi were 10 th -century Sufi authors who have Sufi letters included among their works. Unlike al-Harguşi, however, al-Sarraj not only conveyed letters but also drew attention to their literary importance. Despite attributing special importance to the poems of his predecessors, the texts of letters have priority in analyzing and understanding the symbolic language peculiar to Sufis according to al-Sarraj. With this approach, he attributed special importance to a type of Sufi literature that has yet to be exhausted, due to the Sufi principles regarding privacy, namely protecting information from non-professionals, do not appear in the letters. Therefore, aside from their historical documental quality and literary value, the value of letters is indisputable in terms of being a source for the specific field of knowledge and unique methods of Sufism. The exact percentage of the Sufi literature that is composed of Sufi letters, which differ in terms of their content and addressees, is unknown. However, al-Sarraj talked about a numerical multiplicity enough to fill the volumes at that time.
从苏非写作传统的形成到今天，苏非书信一直保持着它们的文学重要性。在10世纪，al-Sarraj注意到信件的重要性，并建议阅读苏菲派的信件，以便熟悉他们的语言。苏菲们是出于距离和安全等自然原因才写信的。这些信件的收信人有时是苏菲派，有时是乌拉玛，他们会与他们通信，为自己辩护或交换想法，有时这些声明是为了征求意见或作为警告。murshids写给他们的追随者的关于导航他们的s l k[精神道路]的信件在阐明tariqa[苏菲学派/秩序]的历史方面非常重要，例如在传统的形成和延续方面，以及解释s l k科学的复杂性。苏非著作开始于10世纪，并传达了前几个世纪的书面和口头知识。苏菲书信在书面知识中占有重要地位。Al-Sarraj和al-Hargushi是10世纪的苏菲派作家，他们的作品中有苏菲派书信。然而，与al- hargu不同的是，al-Sarraj不仅传达信件，而且使人们注意到信件在文学上的重要性。根据al-Sarraj的观点，尽管前人的诗歌具有特殊的重要性，但信件的文本在分析和理解苏菲派特有的象征语言方面具有优先地位。通过这种方法，他特别重视一种尚未穷尽的苏非文学，因为苏非关于隐私的原则，即保护非专业人士的信息，没有出现在信件中。因此，除了它们的历史文献性质和文学价值外，信件的价值在作为苏菲主义特定知识领域和独特方法的来源方面是无可争辩的。苏菲派文学中苏菲派信件的确切百分比是未知的，这些信件在内容和收信人方面有所不同。然而，al-Sarraj谈到的数字多样性足以填满当时的书。
{"title":"Şâbânî-Kuşadavî Mektuplaşma Geleneğinin Devamı: Mehmet Ali Yitik’in Nuh Naci Erdem’e Mektupları","authors":"Adalet Çakır Çağlı","doi":"10.26650/iuitd.2022.1053317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2022.1053317","url":null,"abstract":"Sufi letters have maintained their literary importance from the formation of the Sufi writing tradition to the present day. In the 10 th century, al-Sarraj drew attention to the importance of letters and recommended reading Sufis’ letters in order to become familiar with their language. Sufis were prompted to write letters for natural reason such as distance and safety. The addressees of the letters were sometimes Sufis and other times the ulama with whom they would correspond for defending or exchanging ideas, and sometimes the statements requested advice or served as a warning. The letters the murshids wrote to their followers on navigating their sülûk [spiritual path] are of great importance in terms of illuminating the history of a tariqa [Sufi school/order], such as in the formation and continuance of a tradition, as well as explaining the intricacies of the science of sülûk . Mehmed Ali Yitik ABSTRACT Sufi works started being written in the 10th century and conveyed the written and verbal knowledge of previous centuries. Sufi correspondence has an important place in written knowledge. Al-Sarraj and al-Hargushi were 10 th -century Sufi authors who have Sufi letters included among their works. Unlike al-Harguşi, however, al-Sarraj not only conveyed letters but also drew attention to their literary importance. Despite attributing special importance to the poems of his predecessors, the texts of letters have priority in analyzing and understanding the symbolic language peculiar to Sufis according to al-Sarraj. With this approach, he attributed special importance to a type of Sufi literature that has yet to be exhausted, due to the Sufi principles regarding privacy, namely protecting information from non-professionals, do not appear in the letters. Therefore, aside from their historical documental quality and literary value, the value of letters is indisputable in terms of being a source for the specific field of knowledge and unique methods of Sufism. The exact percentage of the Sufi literature that is composed of Sufi letters, which differ in terms of their content and addressees, is unknown. However, al-Sarraj talked about a numerical multiplicity enough to fill the volumes at that time.","PeriodicalId":130544,"journal":{"name":"İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi / Journal of Islamic Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130868671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-29DOI: 10.26650/iuitd.2022.1109679
Burak Ergi̇n
Legal reasoning in the Ḥ anafī School happened using various methods such as qiyas [analogy], istihsan [consideration of juristic preference], and takhrīj [deduction]. Another method is intra-madhhab talfıq [amalgamation]. Intra-madhhab talfīq involves the creation of a new view by combining the views of two scholars within the same madhhab who’d expressed opposing views to one another. As stated in the relevant literature, intra-madhhab talfīq was used by the chief qadi of Damascus Tarsūsī in the 14 th century as a method of legal reasoning. Qāsim b. Qatlūbaghā, who lived a century after Tarsūsī, criticized some muftis who proclaimed fatwās using talfīq as a method of legal reasoning, stating talfīq to be an invalid legal method. As for the 16 th century, Shelebī and Ibn Nujaym used talfīq similar to Tarsūsī to solve certain issues related to endowments. By the 17 th century, two jurists of the period, Shurunbulālī and Ibn Bīrī, touched upon this issue deeply in the treatises they wrote on the subject of moving from one madhab to another and talfīq . Both scholars objected to talfīq , stated this method to be unusable for solving fiqh issues. Another Ḥ anafī scholar, Ibn ‘Ābidīn, tried to distinguish between intra-madhhab and inter-madhab. Therefore, this study examines the historical course of the debates on whether or not intra-madhhab talfiq is a usable method of jurisprudence with respect to the Ḥ anafī School as well as its status during the Ottoman era..
{"title":"Hanefi Mezhebinde Yeni Bir İstidlal Yöntemi: Mezheb İçi Telfik","authors":"Burak Ergi̇n","doi":"10.26650/iuitd.2022.1109679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2022.1109679","url":null,"abstract":"Legal reasoning in the Ḥ anafī School happened using various methods such as qiyas [analogy], istihsan [consideration of juristic preference], and takhrīj [deduction]. Another method is intra-madhhab talfıq [amalgamation]. Intra-madhhab talfīq involves the creation of a new view by combining the views of two scholars within the same madhhab who’d expressed opposing views to one another. As stated in the relevant literature, intra-madhhab talfīq was used by the chief qadi of Damascus Tarsūsī in the 14 th century as a method of legal reasoning. Qāsim b. Qatlūbaghā, who lived a century after Tarsūsī, criticized some muftis who proclaimed fatwās using talfīq as a method of legal reasoning, stating talfīq to be an invalid legal method. As for the 16 th century, Shelebī and Ibn Nujaym used talfīq similar to Tarsūsī to solve certain issues related to endowments. By the 17 th century, two jurists of the period, Shurunbulālī and Ibn Bīrī, touched upon this issue deeply in the treatises they wrote on the subject of moving from one madhab to another and talfīq . Both scholars objected to talfīq , stated this method to be unusable for solving fiqh issues. Another Ḥ anafī scholar, Ibn ‘Ābidīn, tried to distinguish between intra-madhhab and inter-madhab. Therefore, this study examines the historical course of the debates on whether or not intra-madhhab talfiq is a usable method of jurisprudence with respect to the Ḥ anafī School as well as its status during the Ottoman era..","PeriodicalId":130544,"journal":{"name":"İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi / Journal of Islamic Review","volume":"19 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132269616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-29DOI: 10.26650/iuitd.2022.1160942
A. Yavuz
{"title":"Oryantalist, Modernist ve Köktenci Yaklaşımların Tasavvuf Anlayışlarına Dair Bir Değerlendirme","authors":"A. Yavuz","doi":"10.26650/iuitd.2022.1160942","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2022.1160942","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":130544,"journal":{"name":"İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi / Journal of Islamic Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125791268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-29DOI: 10.26650/iuitd.2022.1124786
Muharrem Midilli
This article examines Ottoman women’s tricks used to escape from marriage and muftis’ attitudes toward their tricks based on the issues reflected in the fatwa collections. The purpose of the article is to describe the tricks Ottoman women used for dissolving marriage in the face of the strict divorce and separation rules of the Hanafī madhhab and to analyze them alongside the
{"title":"Osmanlı Kadınlarının Evlilik Bağından Kurtulma Oyunları ve Müftüler (16.-18. Yüzyıllar)","authors":"Muharrem Midilli","doi":"10.26650/iuitd.2022.1124786","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2022.1124786","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Ottoman women’s tricks used to escape from marriage and muftis’ attitudes toward their tricks based on the issues reflected in the fatwa collections. The purpose of the article is to describe the tricks Ottoman women used for dissolving marriage in the face of the strict divorce and separation rules of the Hanafī madhhab and to analyze them alongside the","PeriodicalId":130544,"journal":{"name":"İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi / Journal of Islamic Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127438713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-29DOI: 10.26650/iuitd.2022.1068349
Murat Kaş
{"title":"18. Yüzyıl Osmanlı Düşünürü Hafîdü’n-Nisârî’nin Risâle fi mec´ûliyyeti’l-mâhiyyât Başlıklı Risalesi: İnceleme ve Tahkik","authors":"Murat Kaş","doi":"10.26650/iuitd.2022.1068349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2022.1068349","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":130544,"journal":{"name":"İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi / Journal of Islamic Review","volume":"260 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121328340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-29DOI: 10.26650/iuitd.2022.1172869
Mustafa Taş
{"title":"Memlük Dönemi Siyaset Düşüncesi: Siyasi Temalar için Yeni Bir Tasnif Teklifi","authors":"Mustafa Taş","doi":"10.26650/iuitd.2022.1172869","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2022.1172869","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":130544,"journal":{"name":"İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi / Journal of Islamic Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115807823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-29DOI: 10.26650/iuitd.2022.1123964
T. Saraçoğlu
Developments in the field of digital humanities in recent years have occupied the agenda of academia with projects and studies, including Islamic sciences. In general, the history and literature of the field of digital humanities and the various studies in these fields have taken place in the Turkish literature. However, no text has yet been written about studies and projects related to Islamic sciences, nor has a roadmap yet been created for academicians and researchers interested in these fields. The aims of this article are to provide a framework for researchers who are interested in the methods of digital humanities in the field of theology and to present examples from projects related to this field. In this context, this article will discuss the digital possibilities used in the field of theology within the framework of databases and softwares, and then address the working processes of digital humanities within the scope of data acquisition, cleaning, analysis, and visualization. This article will also evaluate prominent studies based on the new research methods digital humanities have brought to this field and projects that will have a long-lasting impact on the future of Islamic sciences under the relevant headings. ABSTRACT This article discusses the processes related to Islamic sciences with a focus on digital humanities, which has emerged as an area that goes beyond being a technical support for researchers, one that also aims to collect the mostly scattered data with its own methods in order to classify it systematically and to make comprehensive analyses and visualizations based on big data. In order to do this, the article first addresses the digital possibilities used in the literature of Islamic sciences up to the present based on Turkey, as well as the databases, digital libraries, and softwares used in the field. The article will then go on to present the definition and processes of digital humanities (DH) that are affiliated with Islamic sciences. The studies conducted in Islamic sciences in this context are seen to present a complex structure that involves the creation of large collections and large datasets based on these collections, as well as their analyses and visualizations, interdisciplinary collaborations, and backing from strong financial support. The article discusses knowledge production in the field of Islamic sciences within the scope of this transformation in related literature and the effect the transition to the digital age has had on this knowledge production in terms of the nature of sources. Accordingly, this process started with manuscripts, continued with printed texts and editorial publications, and then expanded with research based on this literature. The use of digital tools in the field has led to various transformations, and these tools have been used extensively in the digitization of Islamic literature. Databases and digital libraries have become widespread that provide access to handwritten texts an
{"title":"Dijital Beşerî Bilimler Bağlamında İlahiyat/İslâmî İlimler","authors":"T. Saraçoğlu","doi":"10.26650/iuitd.2022.1123964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2022.1123964","url":null,"abstract":"Developments in the field of digital humanities in recent years have occupied the agenda of academia with projects and studies, including Islamic sciences. In general, the history and literature of the field of digital humanities and the various studies in these fields have taken place in the Turkish literature. However, no text has yet been written about studies and projects related to Islamic sciences, nor has a roadmap yet been created for academicians and researchers interested in these fields. The aims of this article are to provide a framework for researchers who are interested in the methods of digital humanities in the field of theology and to present examples from projects related to this field. In this context, this article will discuss the digital possibilities used in the field of theology within the framework of databases and softwares, and then address the working processes of digital humanities within the scope of data acquisition, cleaning, analysis, and visualization. This article will also evaluate prominent studies based on the new research methods digital humanities have brought to this field and projects that will have a long-lasting impact on the future of Islamic sciences under the relevant headings. ABSTRACT This article discusses the processes related to Islamic sciences with a focus on digital humanities, which has emerged as an area that goes beyond being a technical support for researchers, one that also aims to collect the mostly scattered data with its own methods in order to classify it systematically and to make comprehensive analyses and visualizations based on big data. In order to do this, the article first addresses the digital possibilities used in the literature of Islamic sciences up to the present based on Turkey, as well as the databases, digital libraries, and softwares used in the field. The article will then go on to present the definition and processes of digital humanities (DH) that are affiliated with Islamic sciences. The studies conducted in Islamic sciences in this context are seen to present a complex structure that involves the creation of large collections and large datasets based on these collections, as well as their analyses and visualizations, interdisciplinary collaborations, and backing from strong financial support. The article discusses knowledge production in the field of Islamic sciences within the scope of this transformation in related literature and the effect the transition to the digital age has had on this knowledge production in terms of the nature of sources. Accordingly, this process started with manuscripts, continued with printed texts and editorial publications, and then expanded with research based on this literature. The use of digital tools in the field has led to various transformations, and these tools have been used extensively in the digitization of Islamic literature. Databases and digital libraries have become widespread that provide access to handwritten texts an","PeriodicalId":130544,"journal":{"name":"İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi / Journal of Islamic Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131177939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-29DOI: 10.26650/iuitd.2022.1117151
Burak Erman
When concerned with the issue of methodology in the study of Islamic philosophy, the matter of discussion usually involves the scope of Islamic philosophy. However, the suggestion is made that this problem must be considered within the general historiography of thought. Accordingly, this article recommends a theoretical basis regarding Islamic philosophy studies in Turkey through three historiography of thought approaches: the history of philosophy approach as presented by Jacob Brucker (1742-1744), the history of ideas approach as presented by Arthur Lovejoy (1936), and the intellectual history approach as presented by Quentin Skinner (1969). Historical causal explanations regarding the thoughts of a philosopher are suggested to be based on the philosopher’s overall system of thought according to the history of philosophy approach, on various contexts in which that thought is observed according to the history of ideas approach, and on the language and sociopolitical context according to the intellectual history approach. Moreover, this article concretizes the theoretical basis through evaluations of the revisionist al-Ghazālī studies by Richard Frank (1992, 1994), Frank Griffel (2009), Alexander Treiger (2012), and Kenneth Garden (2014). Lastly, some opinions about Islamic philosophy studies in Turkey are given using the approaches discussed in the article. Along with this, the article does not suggest a method, yet it examines three historiography of thought approaches and aims to raise awareness of these approaches as they are adopted.
{"title":"İslam Felsefesi Çalışmalarında Yöntem ve Düşünce Tarihi Yazımı: Tashihçi Gazzâlî Araştırmalarından Hareketle Bir Değerlendirme","authors":"Burak Erman","doi":"10.26650/iuitd.2022.1117151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/iuitd.2022.1117151","url":null,"abstract":"When concerned with the issue of methodology in the study of Islamic philosophy, the matter of discussion usually involves the scope of Islamic philosophy. However, the suggestion is made that this problem must be considered within the general historiography of thought. Accordingly, this article recommends a theoretical basis regarding Islamic philosophy studies in Turkey through three historiography of thought approaches: the history of philosophy approach as presented by Jacob Brucker (1742-1744), the history of ideas approach as presented by Arthur Lovejoy (1936), and the intellectual history approach as presented by Quentin Skinner (1969). Historical causal explanations regarding the thoughts of a philosopher are suggested to be based on the philosopher’s overall system of thought according to the history of philosophy approach, on various contexts in which that thought is observed according to the history of ideas approach, and on the language and sociopolitical context according to the intellectual history approach. Moreover, this article concretizes the theoretical basis through evaluations of the revisionist al-Ghazālī studies by Richard Frank (1992, 1994), Frank Griffel (2009), Alexander Treiger (2012), and Kenneth Garden (2014). Lastly, some opinions about Islamic philosophy studies in Turkey are given using the approaches discussed in the article. Along with this, the article does not suggest a method, yet it examines three historiography of thought approaches and aims to raise awareness of these approaches as they are adopted.","PeriodicalId":130544,"journal":{"name":"İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi / Journal of Islamic Review","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124855015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：