Pub Date : 2023-12-31Epub Date: 2023-02-07DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2172276
Benjamin Z Kahn, Paul L Reiter, Katherine I Kritikos, Melissa B Gilkey, Tara L Queen, Noel T Brewer
Proactive HPV vaccination at age 9 better prevents infection and improves vaccine series completion. Because national organizations recommend starting the vaccine at different ages, we sought to understand the impact of these recommendation frames. In 2022, we surveyed 2,527 US clinical staff (45% physicians) who provide HPV vaccine for children. We randomized respondents to one of three frames based on HPV vaccine recommendations of national organizations or a no-recommendation control, and assessed willingness to recommend HPV vaccine for children ages 9-10. Respondents also reported perceived benefits of HPV vaccination at ages 9 or 12. Recommending HPV vaccination "at ages 11-12" led to lower willingness to vaccinate at ages 9-10 than control (37% vs. 54%, p < .05). Recommending vaccination "at ages 9-12" led to similar willingness as control. However, "starting at age 9" led to higher willingness than control (63% vs. 54%, p < .05). Results were similar across respondents' training, specialty, or years in practice, or their clinic's rurality or healthcare system membership. More common benefits of recommending at age 9 than 12 were avoiding the topic of sex (24% vs. 10%, OR = 2.78, 95%CI: 2.23, 3.48) and completing the vaccine series before age 13 (56% vs. 47%, OR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.23, 1.68). Less common benefits for age 9 were having parents ready to talk about HPV vaccine and agreeing to vaccination (both p < .05). An effective way to encourage proactive HPV vaccination is to say that it starts at age 9. Aligning national recommendations to start at age 9 can promote timely vaccination.
9岁时主动接种HPV疫苗可以更好地预防感染,并提高疫苗系列的完成率。由于国家组织建议在不同年龄开始接种疫苗,我们试图了解这些建议框架的影响。2022年,我们调查了2527名为儿童提供HPV疫苗的美国临床工作人员(45%的医生)。我们根据国家组织的HPV疫苗推荐或无推荐对照,将受访者随机分为三组,并评估了为9-10岁儿童推荐HPV疫苗的意愿。受访者还报告了在9岁或12岁时接种HPV疫苗的益处。建议“11-12岁”接种HPV疫苗导致9-10岁接种意愿低于对照组(37%对54%,p p p
{"title":"Framing of national HPV vaccine recommendations and willingness to recommend at ages 9-10.","authors":"Benjamin Z Kahn, Paul L Reiter, Katherine I Kritikos, Melissa B Gilkey, Tara L Queen, Noel T Brewer","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2172276","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2172276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proactive HPV vaccination at age 9 better prevents infection and improves vaccine series completion. Because national organizations recommend starting the vaccine at different ages, we sought to understand the impact of these recommendation frames. In 2022, we surveyed 2,527 US clinical staff (45% physicians) who provide HPV vaccine for children. We randomized respondents to one of three frames based on HPV vaccine recommendations of national organizations or a no-recommendation control, and assessed willingness to recommend HPV vaccine for children ages 9-10. Respondents also reported perceived benefits of HPV vaccination at ages 9 or 12. Recommending HPV vaccination \"at ages 11-12\" led to lower willingness to vaccinate at ages 9-10 than control (37% vs. 54%, <i>p</i> < .05). Recommending vaccination \"at ages 9-12\" led to similar willingness as control. However, \"starting at age 9\" led to higher willingness than control (63% vs. 54%, <i>p</i> < .05). Results were similar across respondents' training, specialty, or years in practice, or their clinic's rurality or healthcare system membership. More common benefits of recommending at age 9 than 12 were avoiding the topic of sex (24% vs. 10%, OR = 2.78, 95%CI: 2.23, 3.48) and completing the vaccine series before age 13 (56% vs. 47%, OR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.23, 1.68). Less common benefits for age 9 were having parents ready to talk about HPV vaccine and agreeing to vaccination (both <i>p</i> < .05). An effective way to encourage proactive HPV vaccination is to say that it starts at age 9. Aligning national recommendations to start at age 9 can promote timely vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2172276"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/d2/KHVI_19_2172276.PMC10012934.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9696276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-31Epub Date: 2023-05-15DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2210046
Rakesh Awasthi, Harald J Maier, Jie Zhang, Stephen Lim
The emergence of cell and gene therapies has dramatically changed the treatment paradigm in oncology and other therapeutic areas. Kymriah® (tisagenlecleucel), a CD19-directed genetically modified autologous T-cell immunotherapy, is currently approved in major markets for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) pediatric and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia, r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and r/r follicular lymphoma. This article presents a high-level overview of the clinical development journey of tisagenlecleucel, including its efficacy outcomes and safety considerations.
{"title":"Kymriah® (tisagenlecleucel) - An overview of the clinical development journey of the first approved CAR-T therapy.","authors":"Rakesh Awasthi, Harald J Maier, Jie Zhang, Stephen Lim","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2210046","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2210046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emergence of cell and gene therapies has dramatically changed the treatment paradigm in oncology and other therapeutic areas. Kymriah® (tisagenlecleucel), a CD19-directed genetically modified autologous T-cell immunotherapy, is currently approved in major markets for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) pediatric and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia, r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and r/r follicular lymphoma. This article presents a high-level overview of the clinical development journey of tisagenlecleucel, including its efficacy outcomes and safety considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2210046"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/4f/KHVI_19_2210046.PMC10294746.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9706829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-31Epub Date: 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2165856
Moe H Kyaw, Julia Spinardi, Ling Zhang, Helen May Lin Oh, Amit Srivastava
Introduction of primary COVID-19 vaccination has helped reduce severe disease and death caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Understanding the protection conferred by heterologous booster regimens informs alternative vaccination strategies that enable programmatic resilience and can catalyze vaccine confidence and coverage. Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are among the most widely used vaccines worldwide. This review synthesizes the available evidence identified as of May 26, 2022, on the safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of a heterologous BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccine booster dose after an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine primary series, to help protect against COVID-19. Evidence showed that the heterologous BNT16b2 mRNA vaccine booster enhances immunogenicity and improves vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19, and no new safety concerns were identified with heterologous inactivated primary series with mRNA booster combinations.
{"title":"Evidence synthesis and pooled analysis of vaccine effectiveness for COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 as a heterologous booster after inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus vaccines.","authors":"Moe H Kyaw, Julia Spinardi, Ling Zhang, Helen May Lin Oh, Amit Srivastava","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2165856","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2165856","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction of primary COVID-19 vaccination has helped reduce severe disease and death caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Understanding the protection conferred by heterologous booster regimens informs alternative vaccination strategies that enable programmatic resilience and can catalyze vaccine confidence and coverage. Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are among the most widely used vaccines worldwide. This review synthesizes the available evidence identified as of May 26, 2022, on the safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of a heterologous BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccine booster dose after an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine primary series, to help protect against COVID-19. Evidence showed that the heterologous BNT16b2 mRNA vaccine booster enhances immunogenicity and improves vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19, and no new safety concerns were identified with heterologous inactivated primary series with mRNA booster combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2165856"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/49/KHVI_19_2165856.PMC9980688.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10286783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-31Epub Date: 2023-02-15DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2176083
Luigi Roberto Biasio, Patrizio Zanobini, Chiara Lorini, Pietro Monaci, Alice Fanfani, Veronica Gallinoro, Gabriele Cerini, Giuseppe Albora, Marco Del Riccio, Sergio Pecorelli, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi
To address vaccine hesitancy, specific self-rated tools have been developed to assess vaccine literacy (VL) related to COVID-19, including additional variables, such as beliefs, behavior, and willingness to be vaccinated. To explore the recent literature a search was performed selecting articles published between January 2020 and October 2022: 26 papers were identified using these tools in the context of COVID-19. Descriptive analysis showed that the levels of VL observed in the studies were generally in agreement, with functional VL score often lower than the interactive-critical dimension, as if the latter was stimulated by the COVID-19-related infodemic. Factors associated with VL included vaccination status, age, educational level, and, possibly, gender. Effective communication based on VL when promoting vaccination is critical to sustaining immunization against COVID-19 and other communicable diseases. The VL scales developed to date have shown good consistency. However, further research is needed to improve these tools and develop new ones.
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review.","authors":"Luigi Roberto Biasio, Patrizio Zanobini, Chiara Lorini, Pietro Monaci, Alice Fanfani, Veronica Gallinoro, Gabriele Cerini, Giuseppe Albora, Marco Del Riccio, Sergio Pecorelli, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2176083","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2176083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To address vaccine hesitancy, specific self-rated tools have been developed to assess vaccine literacy (VL) related to COVID-19, including additional variables, such as beliefs, behavior, and willingness to be vaccinated. To explore the recent literature a search was performed selecting articles published between January 2020 and October 2022: 26 papers were identified using these tools in the context of COVID-19. Descriptive analysis showed that the levels of VL observed in the studies were generally in agreement, with functional VL score often lower than the interactive-critical dimension, as if the latter was stimulated by the COVID-19-related infodemic. Factors associated with VL included vaccination status, age, educational level, and, possibly, gender. Effective communication based on VL when promoting vaccination is critical to sustaining immunization against COVID-19 and other communicable diseases. The VL scales developed to date have shown good consistency. However, further research is needed to improve these tools and develop new ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2176083"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/20/a4/KHVI_19_2176083.PMC10026896.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9211437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Herein, we report the case of a 22-year-old woman with hereditary spherocytosis (HS) whose condition worsened after administration of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), mRNA vaccine 'BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech.' The woman had been diagnosed with HS in 2005, and her condition remained stable until February 2021. In March 2021, she received the first dose of the above vaccine and experienced pain at the injection site. After the second dose in April 2021, she developed fever and general malaise. Investigations revealed progression of hemolysis, which improved after a few days. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of progression of hemolysis in a patient with HS after administration of the mRNA vaccine COVID-19, BNT162b2 'Pfizer-BioNTech.'
{"title":"Progression of hemolysis in a patient with hereditary spherocytosis after the second dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.","authors":"Jun Nomura, Masafumi Seki, Syori Abe, Tadahiro Kobayashi, Yoko Okitsu, Noriko Fukuhara, Shinichiro Takahashi, Hideo Harigae, Junichi Kameoka","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2165381","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2165381","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Herein, we report the case of a 22-year-old woman with hereditary spherocytosis (HS) whose condition worsened after administration of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), mRNA vaccine 'BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech.' The woman had been diagnosed with HS in 2005, and her condition remained stable until February 2021. In March 2021, she received the first dose of the above vaccine and experienced pain at the injection site. After the second dose in April 2021, she developed fever and general malaise. Investigations revealed progression of hemolysis, which improved after a few days. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of progression of hemolysis in a patient with HS after administration of the mRNA vaccine COVID-19, BNT162b2 'Pfizer-BioNTech.'</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2165381"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/7d/KHVI_19_2165381.PMC10012938.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9920376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-31Epub Date: 2023-01-30DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2169531
Yu Lu, Xiaoyan Zhang, Jiyu Ning, Manyan Zhang
Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) present promising application prospects in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate optimal treatment strategy by comparing the first-line treatment strategies with ICIs in NSCLC. We retrieved relevant studies on first-line therapy of NSCLC with ICIs. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were treatment-related serious adverse events (tr-SAEs) with grade 3 or higher and objective response rate (ORR). We also conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis. We included 14 studies involving 7,823 patients and compared seven different interventions. In PD-L1 nonselective NSCLC, nivolumab+ipilimumab had good PFS and ORR, pembrolizumab significantly prolonged OS, and nivolumab had the fewest adverse events (AEs). For PD-L1-positive patients, nivolumab remarkably prolonged OS. For those with negative PD-L1, nivolumab+ipilimumab also showed an advantage. In addition, nivolumab+ipilimumab significantly prolonged the PFS in both PD-L1-negative and -positive patients. For patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) within 1-49%, atezolizumab+chemotherapy remarkably prolonged PFS and OS. For those with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%, pembrolizumab prolonged OS and atezolizumab+chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS. Nivolumab combined with ipilimumab showed advantages in OS, PFS and ORR in most patients. Nivolumab+ipilimumab may be the optimal first-line therapy for NSCLC.
{"title":"Immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yu Lu, Xiaoyan Zhang, Jiyu Ning, Manyan Zhang","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2169531","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2169531","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) present promising application prospects in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate optimal treatment strategy by comparing the first-line treatment strategies with ICIs in NSCLC. We retrieved relevant studies on first-line therapy of NSCLC with ICIs. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were treatment-related serious adverse events (tr-SAEs) with grade 3 or higher and objective response rate (ORR). We also conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis. We included 14 studies involving 7,823 patients and compared seven different interventions. In PD-L1 nonselective NSCLC, nivolumab+ipilimumab had good PFS and ORR, pembrolizumab significantly prolonged OS, and nivolumab had the fewest adverse events (AEs). For PD-L1-positive patients, nivolumab remarkably prolonged OS. For those with negative PD-L1, nivolumab+ipilimumab also showed an advantage. In addition, nivolumab+ipilimumab significantly prolonged the PFS in both PD-L1-negative and -positive patients. For patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) within 1-49%, atezolizumab+chemotherapy remarkably prolonged PFS and OS. For those with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%, pembrolizumab prolonged OS and atezolizumab+chemotherapy significantly prolonged PFS. Nivolumab combined with ipilimumab showed advantages in OS, PFS and ORR in most patients. Nivolumab+ipilimumab may be the optimal first-line therapy for NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2169531"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/00/KHVI_19_2169531.PMC10038046.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9929646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Condyloma acuminatum (CA) is a sexually transmitted disease (STD) caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. It is important to study the prevalence and distribution of HPV genotypes before implementing the HPV vaccination program. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of CA cases and the distribution of HPV genotypes in Shandong Province, China. One-to-one questionnaire surveys were conducted on all patients diagnosed with CA in sentinel hospitals from Shandong Province, China. HPV genotypes were determined using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-reverse dot blot hybridization method. The study enrolled 1185 patients (870 males and 315 females) and found that CA patients are mainly males and sexually active people between the ages of 20 and 40. Recurrence occurred in 34.7% patients. Among the 880 CA patients who underwent HPV typing, the HPV test positivity rate was 91.4%. In these cases, low-risk (LR) HPV infection was predominant, with an infection rate of 91.3%, while high-risk (HR) HPV genotypes were found in 53.5% patients. The most frequent HPV genotypes encountered were HPV6 (57.8%), HPV11 (37.2%), HPV16 (13.7%), and HPV42 (10.3%). HPV6 and/or HPV11 are the main infections in all patients, and more than half of the patients are coinfected with HR-HPV. However, unlike other regions, HPV42 has a higher prevalence rate among CA patients in Shandong Province and is a nonvaccine HPV genotype. Therefore, regular HPV typing helps to understand the characteristics of specific genotypes and the choice of the best type for vaccine coverage.
{"title":"Epidemiology of human papillomavirus on condyloma acuminatum in Shandong Province,China.","authors":"Haowen Yuan, Renpeng Li, Jian Lv, Guipeng Yi, Xihong Sun, Na Zhao, Fengjun Zhao, Aiqiang Xu, Zengqiang Kou, Hongling Wen","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2170662","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2170662","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Condyloma acuminatum (CA) is a sexually transmitted disease (STD) caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. It is important to study the prevalence and distribution of HPV genotypes before implementing the HPV vaccination program. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of CA cases and the distribution of HPV genotypes in Shandong Province, China. One-to-one questionnaire surveys were conducted on all patients diagnosed with CA in sentinel hospitals from Shandong Province, China. HPV genotypes were determined using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-reverse dot blot hybridization method. The study enrolled 1185 patients (870 males and 315 females) and found that CA patients are mainly males and sexually active people between the ages of 20 and 40. Recurrence occurred in 34.7% patients. Among the 880 CA patients who underwent HPV typing, the HPV test positivity rate was 91.4%. In these cases, low-risk (LR) HPV infection was predominant, with an infection rate of 91.3%, while high-risk (HR) HPV genotypes were found in 53.5% patients. The most frequent HPV genotypes encountered were HPV6 (57.8%), HPV11 (37.2%), HPV16 (13.7%), and HPV42 (10.3%). HPV6 and/or HPV11 are the main infections in all patients, and more than half of the patients are coinfected with HR-HPV. However, unlike other regions, HPV42 has a higher prevalence rate among CA patients in Shandong Province and is a nonvaccine HPV genotype. Therefore, regular HPV typing helps to understand the characteristics of specific genotypes and the choice of the best type for vaccine coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2170662"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/d2/KHVI_19_2170662.PMC10064924.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9348221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-31Epub Date: 2023-02-21DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2177461
Richard K Zimmerman, Klancie Dauer, Lloyd Clarke, Mary Patricia Nowalk, Jonathan M Raviotta, G K Balasubramani
Newer influenza vaccine formulations have entered the market, but real-world effectiveness studies are not widely conducted until there is sufficient uptake. We conducted a retrospective test-negative case-control study to determine relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of recombinant influenza vaccine or RIV4, compared with standard dose vaccines (SD) in a health system with significant RIV4 uptake. Using the electronic medical record (EMR) and the Pennsylvania state immunization registry to confirm influenza vaccination, VE against outpatient medically attended visits was calculated. Immunocompetent outpatients ages 18-64 years seen in hospital-based clinics or emergency departments who were tested for influenza using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays during the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons were included. Propensity scores with inverse probability weighting were used to adjust for potential confounders and determine rVE. Among this mostly white and female cohort of 5,515 individuals, 510 were vaccinated with RIV4 and 557 were vaccinated with SD, with the balance of 4,448 (81%) being unvaccinated. Adjusted influenza VE estimates were 37% overall (95% CI = 27, 46), 40% (95% CI = 25, 51) for RIV4 and 35% (95% CI = 20, 47) for standard dose vaccines. Overall, rVE of RIV4 compared to SD was not significantly higher (11%; 95% CI = -20, 33). Influenza vaccines were moderately protective against medically attended outpatient influenza during the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 seasons. Although the point estimates are higher for RIV4, the large confidence intervals around VE estimates suggest this study was underpowered to detect significant rVE of individual vaccine formulations.
{"title":"Vaccine effectiveness of recombinant and standard dose influenza vaccines against outpatient illness during 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 calculated using a retrospective test-negative design.","authors":"Richard K Zimmerman, Klancie Dauer, Lloyd Clarke, Mary Patricia Nowalk, Jonathan M Raviotta, G K Balasubramani","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2177461","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2177461","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Newer influenza vaccine formulations have entered the market, but real-world effectiveness studies are not widely conducted until there is sufficient uptake. We conducted a retrospective test-negative case-control study to determine relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of recombinant influenza vaccine or RIV4, compared with standard dose vaccines (SD) in a health system with significant RIV4 uptake. Using the electronic medical record (EMR) and the Pennsylvania state immunization registry to confirm influenza vaccination, VE against outpatient medically attended visits was calculated. Immunocompetent outpatients ages 18-64 years seen in hospital-based clinics or emergency departments who were tested for influenza using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays during the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons were included. Propensity scores with inverse probability weighting were used to adjust for potential confounders and determine rVE. Among this mostly white and female cohort of 5,515 individuals, 510 were vaccinated with RIV4 and 557 were vaccinated with SD, with the balance of 4,448 (81%) being unvaccinated. Adjusted influenza VE estimates were 37% overall (95% CI = 27, 46), 40% (95% CI = 25, 51) for RIV4 and 35% (95% CI = 20, 47) for standard dose vaccines. Overall, rVE of RIV4 compared to SD was not significantly higher (11%; 95% CI = -20, 33). Influenza vaccines were moderately protective against medically attended outpatient influenza during the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 seasons. Although the point estimates are higher for RIV4, the large confidence intervals around VE estimates suggest this study was underpowered to detect significant rVE of individual vaccine formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2177461"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/50/KHVI_19_2177461.PMC10026862.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9678274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-31DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2212568
Aparajita Sarkar, Sara Omar, Aya Alshareef, Kareem Fanous, Shaunak Sarker, Hasan Alroobi, Fahad Zamir, Mahmoud Yousef, Dalia Zakaria
The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 was detected in October 2021 and exhibited high transmissibility, immune evasion, and reduced severity when compared to the earlier variants. The lesser vaccine effectiveness against Omicron and its reduced severity created vaccination hesitancy among the public. This review compiled data reporting the relative prevalence of Omicron as compared to the early variants to give an insight into the existing variants, which may shape the decisions regarding the targets of the newly developed vaccines. Complied data revealed more than 90% prevalence within the infected cohorts in some countries. The BA.1 subvariant predominated over the BA.2 during the early stages of the Omicron wave. Moreover, BA.4/BA.5 subvariants were detected in South Africa, USA and Italy between October 2021 and April 2022. It is therefore important to develop vaccines that protect against Omicron as well as the early variants, which are known to cause more severe complications.
{"title":"The relative prevalence of the Omicron variant within SARS-CoV-2 infected cohorts in different countries: A systematic review.","authors":"Aparajita Sarkar, Sara Omar, Aya Alshareef, Kareem Fanous, Shaunak Sarker, Hasan Alroobi, Fahad Zamir, Mahmoud Yousef, Dalia Zakaria","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2212568","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2212568","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 was detected in October 2021 and exhibited high transmissibility, immune evasion, and reduced severity when compared to the earlier variants. The lesser vaccine effectiveness against Omicron and its reduced severity created vaccination hesitancy among the public. This review compiled data reporting the relative prevalence of Omicron as compared to the early variants to give an insight into the existing variants, which may shape the decisions regarding the targets of the newly developed vaccines. Complied data revealed more than 90% prevalence within the infected cohorts in some countries. The BA.1 subvariant predominated over the BA.2 during the early stages of the Omicron wave. Moreover, BA.4/BA.5 subvariants were detected in South Africa, USA and Italy between October 2021 and April 2022. It is therefore important to develop vaccines that protect against Omicron as well as the early variants, which are known to cause more severe complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2212568"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d4/ec/KHVI_19_2212568.PMC10234134.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9573222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-31Epub Date: 2023-04-27DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2202091
Sandhya Narayanan, Corey H Basch
YouTube is a highly popular social media platform capable of widespread information dissemination about COVID-19 vaccines. The aim of this mini scoping review was to summarize the content, quality, and methodology of studies that analyze YouTube videos related to COVID-19 vaccines. COVIDENCE was used to screen search results based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. PRISMA was used for data organization, and the final list of 9 articles used in the mini review were summarized and synthesized. YouTube videos included in each study, total number of cumulative views, results, and limitations were described. Overall, most of the videos were uploaded by television and internet news media and healthcare professionals. A variety of coding schemas were used in the studies. Videos with misleading, inaccurate, or anti-vaccination sentiment were more often uploaded by consumers. Officials seeking to encourage vaccination may utilize YouTube for widespread reach and to debunk misinformation and disinformation.
{"title":"YouTube and COVID-19 vaccines: A mini scoping review.","authors":"Sandhya Narayanan, Corey H Basch","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2202091","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2023.2202091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>YouTube is a highly popular social media platform capable of widespread information dissemination about COVID-19 vaccines. The aim of this mini scoping review was to summarize the content, quality, and methodology of studies that analyze YouTube videos related to COVID-19 vaccines. COVIDENCE was used to screen search results based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. PRISMA was used for data organization, and the final list of 9 articles used in the mini review were summarized and synthesized. YouTube videos included in each study, total number of cumulative views, results, and limitations were described. Overall, most of the videos were uploaded by television and internet news media and healthcare professionals. A variety of coding schemas were used in the studies. Videos with misleading, inaccurate, or anti-vaccination sentiment were more often uploaded by consumers. Officials seeking to encourage vaccination may utilize YouTube for widespread reach and to debunk misinformation and disinformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"19 1","pages":"2202091"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/e0/KHVI_19_2202091.PMC10294758.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9697874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}