首页 > 最新文献

Hernia最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluating the EHS parastomal hernia classification for surgical planning. Author's response. 评估用于手术规划的 EHS 腹股沟旁疝分类。作者回复。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03211-9
Marek Szczepkowski, Mateusz Zamkowski, Przywózka-Suwała Alicja, Witkowski Piotr, Maciej Śmietański
{"title":"Evaluating the EHS parastomal hernia classification for surgical planning. Author's response.","authors":"Marek Szczepkowski, Mateusz Zamkowski, Przywózka-Suwała Alicja, Witkowski Piotr, Maciej Śmietański","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03211-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03211-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment to: A comparative study of magnetic sphincter augmentation and Nissen fundoplication in the management of GERD. 发表评论:磁性括约肌增强术与尼森胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的比较研究。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03221-7
Marwan Emad Abdou, Ahmed Abokhozima, Hassan El-Masry, Mohamed H Zidan
{"title":"Comment to: A comparative study of magnetic sphincter augmentation and Nissen fundoplication in the management of GERD.","authors":"Marwan Emad Abdou, Ahmed Abokhozima, Hassan El-Masry, Mohamed H Zidan","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03221-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03221-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142647548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia formation: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis. 使用预防性网片预防腹股沟旁疝形成:系统综述、荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03219-1
David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Gal Saffati, Shane Kronstedt, Troy La, Madeline Chaput, Shubh Desai, Gustavo A Salgado-Garza, Sagar R Patel, Jackson Cathey, Jeremy R Slawin

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic mesh placement in reducing the incidence of parastomal hernias following colostomy, ileostomy, and ileal conduit formation.

Methods: A systematic review identified relevant studies evaluating parastomal hernia incidence with prophylactic mesh use during stoma formation. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis using Bayesian modeling were performed.

Results: 25 studies, consisting of 16 randomized control trials (RCT), 6 follow up studies, and 3 retrospective cohort studies, were included. Prophylactic mesh led to significantly fewer parastomal hernias beyond 6 months follow-up (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.58). Hernias were reduced with mesh for both ileal conduits and colostomies. When analyzing hazard ratios (HRs), only 6 studies were included, and a statistically significant difference was observed among both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (HR 0.75 [0.53, 0.92], p = 0.01) and non-RCTs (HR 0.57 [0.36, 0.92], p = 0.02). Network meta-analysis found the retromuscular approach with mesh had the lowest hernia rate. Regression was non-significant for variations between study types.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated prophylactic mesh placement during ostomy creation significantly reduced parastomal hernia risk, more prominently beyond 6 months, consistently across randomized trials and observational studies for urologic and gastrointestinal ostomies. The retromuscular technique was most effective.

目的:评估在结肠造口术、回肠造口术和回肠导管形成术后,预防性放置网片在降低造口旁疝发病率方面的效果:一项系统性综述确定了评估造口形成过程中预防性使用网片导致的腹股沟旁疝发生率的相关研究。结果:共纳入 25 项研究,包括 16 项随机对照试验 (RCT)、6 项随访研究和 3 项回顾性队列研究。预防性网片使随访 6 个月后的腹股沟旁疝明显减少(OR 0.43,95% CI 0.33-0.58)。使用网片可减少回肠导管和结肠造口的疝气。在分析危险比(HRs)时,仅纳入了 6 项研究,在随机对照试验(RCTs)(HR 0.75 [0.53, 0.92],P = 0.01)和非 RCTs(HR 0.57 [0.36, 0.92],P = 0.02)之间观察到了显著的统计学差异。网络荟萃分析发现,使用网片的再肌层疗法的疝气发生率最低。不同研究类型之间的回归差异不显著:这项荟萃分析表明,在泌尿系统和胃肠道造口的随机试验和观察性研究中,造口术中预防性网片置入可显著降低造口旁疝的风险,6 个月后的风险更为突出。重肌技术最为有效。
{"title":"Use of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia formation: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.","authors":"David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Gal Saffati, Shane Kronstedt, Troy La, Madeline Chaput, Shubh Desai, Gustavo A Salgado-Garza, Sagar R Patel, Jackson Cathey, Jeremy R Slawin","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03219-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10029-024-03219-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic mesh placement in reducing the incidence of parastomal hernias following colostomy, ileostomy, and ileal conduit formation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review identified relevant studies evaluating parastomal hernia incidence with prophylactic mesh use during stoma formation. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis using Bayesian modeling were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25 studies, consisting of 16 randomized control trials (RCT), 6 follow up studies, and 3 retrospective cohort studies, were included. Prophylactic mesh led to significantly fewer parastomal hernias beyond 6 months follow-up (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.58). Hernias were reduced with mesh for both ileal conduits and colostomies. When analyzing hazard ratios (HRs), only 6 studies were included, and a statistically significant difference was observed among both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (HR 0.75 [0.53, 0.92], p = 0.01) and non-RCTs (HR 0.57 [0.36, 0.92], p = 0.02). Network meta-analysis found the retromuscular approach with mesh had the lowest hernia rate. Regression was non-significant for variations between study types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrated prophylactic mesh placement during ostomy creation significantly reduced parastomal hernia risk, more prominently beyond 6 months, consistently across randomized trials and observational studies for urologic and gastrointestinal ostomies. The retromuscular technique was most effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142647491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment to: Should routine surgical wound drainage after ventral hernia repair be avoided. 发表评论:腹股沟疝修补术后是否应避免常规手术伤口引流。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03187-6
Junsheng Li
{"title":"Comment to: Should routine surgical wound drainage after ventral hernia repair be avoided.","authors":"Junsheng Li","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03187-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03187-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142647551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of clinically significant weight loss prior to open ventral hernia repair. 开放式腹股沟疝修补术前临床体重明显减轻的影响。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03208-4
Samuel S Huffman, Lauren E Berger, Grace C Bloomfield, Holly D Shan, Julian K Marable, Richard W Garrett, Daisy L Spoer, Romina Deldar, Karen K Evans, Parag Bhanot, Yewande R Alimi

Purpose: The study aim was to assess the impact of clinically significant weight loss (CSWL; ≥5% weight reduction) on postoperative complications following abdominal wall reconstruction with the component separation technique (CST).

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent open ventral hernia repair (VHR) with CST from November 2008 to January 2022 was performed. Cohorts were stratified by presence of CSWL from baseline weight at preoperative consultation.

Results: Of 180 total patients, 40 (22.2%) achieved CSWL prior to VHR. Mean age was 59.6 ± 11.2 years. Patients in the CSWL cohort represented a higher average body mass index (BMI) (33.6 vs. 31.7 kg/m2, p = 0.076), and were obese more frequently (80.0% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.007). The CSWL cohort had a higher proportion of patients in Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) classification II (82.5% vs. 63.6%) while the non-CSWL cohort had more VHWG classification III/IV (20.0% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.078). Mean follow-up duration was 6.1 ± 13.4 months. Complications, including 30- and 90-day surgical site occurrence (SSO), return to operating room, readmission, and hernia recurrence (CSWL: 5.0% vs. non-CWL 1.4%, p = 0.179), were comparable between cohorts. BMI was an independent predictor of any complication (OR 1.07, p = 0.044) and 90-day SSO (OR 1.10, p = 0.043).

Conclusion: Achievement of CSWL prior to open VHR utilizing CST results in similar post-reconstruction outcomes to patients who maintained a comparable BMI at baseline. Higher day-of-surgery BMI was more consequential to postoperative complications than percent weight loss.

目的:该研究旨在评估临床意义上的体重减轻(CSWL;体重减轻≥5%)对采用组件分离技术(CST)进行腹壁重建后术后并发症的影响:方法:对2008年11月至2022年1月期间使用CST进行开放式腹股沟疝修补术(VHR)的患者进行回顾性研究。根据术前就诊时的基线体重是否存在 CSWL 对组群进行分层:结果:在180名患者中,有40人(22.2%)在VHR术前进行了CSWL。平均年龄为 59.6 ± 11.2 岁。CSWL组患者的平均体重指数(BMI)较高(33.6 vs. 31.7 kg/m2,p = 0.076),肥胖率较高(80.0% vs. 56.4%,p = 0.007)。CSWL队列中腹股沟疝工作组(VHWG)II级患者比例更高(82.5% vs. 63.6%),而非CSWL队列中VHWG III/IV级患者比例更高(20.0% vs. 10.0%,p = 0.078)。平均随访时间为 6.1 ± 13.4 个月。并发症,包括30天和90天手术部位发生率(SSO)、返回手术室、再次入院和疝气复发(CSWL:5.0% 对非CWL:1.4%,P = 0.179),在各组间具有可比性。BMI是任何并发症(OR 1.07,p = 0.044)和90天SSO(OR 1.10,p = 0.043)的独立预测因子:结论:利用 CST 在开放式 VHR 之前实现 CSWL 会导致与基线体重指数相当的患者获得相似的重建后结果。与体重减轻百分比相比,手术当天体重指数越高,对术后并发症的影响越大。
{"title":"The effect of clinically significant weight loss prior to open ventral hernia repair.","authors":"Samuel S Huffman, Lauren E Berger, Grace C Bloomfield, Holly D Shan, Julian K Marable, Richard W Garrett, Daisy L Spoer, Romina Deldar, Karen K Evans, Parag Bhanot, Yewande R Alimi","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03208-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03208-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aim was to assess the impact of clinically significant weight loss (CSWL; ≥5% weight reduction) on postoperative complications following abdominal wall reconstruction with the component separation technique (CST).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who underwent open ventral hernia repair (VHR) with CST from November 2008 to January 2022 was performed. Cohorts were stratified by presence of CSWL from baseline weight at preoperative consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 180 total patients, 40 (22.2%) achieved CSWL prior to VHR. Mean age was 59.6 ± 11.2 years. Patients in the CSWL cohort represented a higher average body mass index (BMI) (33.6 vs. 31.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.076), and were obese more frequently (80.0% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.007). The CSWL cohort had a higher proportion of patients in Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) classification II (82.5% vs. 63.6%) while the non-CSWL cohort had more VHWG classification III/IV (20.0% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.078). Mean follow-up duration was 6.1 ± 13.4 months. Complications, including 30- and 90-day surgical site occurrence (SSO), return to operating room, readmission, and hernia recurrence (CSWL: 5.0% vs. non-CWL 1.4%, p = 0.179), were comparable between cohorts. BMI was an independent predictor of any complication (OR 1.07, p = 0.044) and 90-day SSO (OR 1.10, p = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achievement of CSWL prior to open VHR utilizing CST results in similar post-reconstruction outcomes to patients who maintained a comparable BMI at baseline. Higher day-of-surgery BMI was more consequential to postoperative complications than percent weight loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost analysis of open versus robot-assisted ventral hernia repair. Author's reply. 开放式腹股沟疝修补术与机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术的成本分析。作者回复。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03206-6
Nadia A Henriksen, Mads Marckmann, Mette Willaume Christoffersen, Kristian K Jensen
{"title":"Cost analysis of open versus robot-assisted ventral hernia repair. Author's reply.","authors":"Nadia A Henriksen, Mads Marckmann, Mette Willaume Christoffersen, Kristian K Jensen","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03206-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03206-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Females report worse outcomes than males one year after ventral hernia repair. 腹股沟疝修补术一年后,女性的治疗效果比男性差。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03210-w
Elanna K Arhos, Faith Kosa, Li-Ching Huang, Benjamin K Poulose, Ajit M W Chaudhari, Stephanie Di Stasi

Purpose: To assess sex differences in patient-reported quality of life, pain, and hernia recurrence after adjusting for confounding features of hernia disease in a large national registry one year after ventral hernia repair.

Methods: Data were analyzed retrospectively from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative national registry from pre-operatively until one year post-operatively. 3,172 patients undergoing elective ventral hernia repair with 1-year follow-up data were included for analysis after propensity score matching (1:1 match; females: mean [interquartile range] age, 60 [49, 68]; body mass index, 32 [27, 36]; males: age, 60 [52, 68]; 31 [28, 35]. The primary outcome of interest between sexes was the Hernia Related Quality of Life survey (HerQLes), and secondary outcome measures included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Intensity (PROMIS) short form (3a) score and hernia recurrence.

Results: Female sex was associated with worse HerQLes and PROMIS pain 3a scores at 1 year follow up (adjusted mean difference, -2.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.11 to -0.72; p = 0.004; adjusted mean difference, 1.27, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.87; p < 0.001) compared to male sex. Hernia recurrence rates at 1 year were not different between sexes.

Conclusion: Females reported worse quality of life and higher levels of pain at 1-year post ventral hernia repair after accounting for age, BMI, hernia width, and baseline quality of life compared to males. There were no differences between females and males with respect to hernia recurrence at 1-year follow-up, and 1 in 5 patients experienced a recurrence at this time point.

目的:在腹股沟疝修补术后一年的大型全国登记中,评估调整疝疾病的混杂特征后,患者报告的生活质量、疼痛和疝复发的性别差异:我们对腹部核心健康质量合作组织全国登记处从术前到术后一年的数据进行了回顾性分析。经过倾向得分匹配(1:1 匹配;女性:平均[四分位间范围]年龄,60 [49, 68];体重指数,32 [27, 36];男性:年龄,60 [52, 68];31 [28, 35])后,纳入了 3,172 名接受选择性腹股沟疝修补术且有 1 年随访数据的患者进行分析。性别间的主要结果是疝气相关生活质量调查(HerQLes),次要结果测量包括患者报告结果测量信息系统疼痛强度(PROMIS)简表(3a)评分和疝气复发:结果:女性性别与随访1年时较差的HerQLes和PROMIS疼痛3a评分有关(调整后的平均差为-2.42,95%置信区间(CI)为-4.11至-0.72;P = 0.004;调整后的平均差为1.27,95% CI为0.67至1.87;P 结论:女性的生活质量和PROMIS疼痛3a评分均较差:在考虑年龄、体重指数、疝气宽度和基线生活质量等因素后,与男性相比,女性在腹股沟疝修补术后一年的生活质量更差,疼痛程度更高。在随访 1 年时,女性和男性在疝气复发方面没有差异,每 5 名患者中就有 1 人在此时间点复发。
{"title":"Females report worse outcomes than males one year after ventral hernia repair.","authors":"Elanna K Arhos, Faith Kosa, Li-Ching Huang, Benjamin K Poulose, Ajit M W Chaudhari, Stephanie Di Stasi","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03210-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03210-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess sex differences in patient-reported quality of life, pain, and hernia recurrence after adjusting for confounding features of hernia disease in a large national registry one year after ventral hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed retrospectively from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative national registry from pre-operatively until one year post-operatively. 3,172 patients undergoing elective ventral hernia repair with 1-year follow-up data were included for analysis after propensity score matching (1:1 match; females: mean [interquartile range] age, 60 [49, 68]; body mass index, 32 [27, 36]; males: age, 60 [52, 68]; 31 [28, 35]. The primary outcome of interest between sexes was the Hernia Related Quality of Life survey (HerQLes), and secondary outcome measures included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Intensity (PROMIS) short form (3a) score and hernia recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Female sex was associated with worse HerQLes and PROMIS pain 3a scores at 1 year follow up (adjusted mean difference, -2.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.11 to -0.72; p = 0.004; adjusted mean difference, 1.27, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.87; p < 0.001) compared to male sex. Hernia recurrence rates at 1 year were not different between sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Females reported worse quality of life and higher levels of pain at 1-year post ventral hernia repair after accounting for age, BMI, hernia width, and baseline quality of life compared to males. There were no differences between females and males with respect to hernia recurrence at 1-year follow-up, and 1 in 5 patients experienced a recurrence at this time point.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment to: Do surgical drains reduce surgical site occurrence and infection after incisional hernia repair with sublay mesh? 发表评论:手术引流管是否能减少使用衬垫网片进行切口疝修补术后的手术部位发生率和感染率?
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03200-y
Junsheng Li
{"title":"Comment to: Do surgical drains reduce surgical site occurrence and infection after incisional hernia repair with sublay mesh?","authors":"Junsheng Li","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03200-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03200-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The development, implementation, and evaluation of a pre-rotation quiz to improve resident preparedness for an abdominal wall reconstruction surgical rotation. 开发、实施和评估轮转前测验,以提高住院医师对腹壁重建外科轮转的准备程度。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03189-4
Sara M Maskal, Nicole E Brooks, Ryan C Ellis, Megan Melland-Smith, Nir Messer, Benjamin T Miller, Lucas R A Beffa, Clayton C Petro, Ajita S Prabhu, Michael J Rosen

Introduction: Although hernia repair constitutes a significant portion of surgical training, education around more complex hernia concepts such as abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) or paraesophageal hernia repair may be lacking. We developed and implemented a pre-rotation quiz for residents on an AWR and minimally invasive surgery service. We also investigated the staff and resident perception of resident knowledge and experience of the rotation before and after quiz implementation.

Methods: The multiple-choice quiz questions were written by clinical and research fellows, validated by four staff, two fellows, and two senior residents and implemented in June 2023. Questions assessed knowledge of anatomy, operative steps, mesh materials, clinical trials, and postoperative management specific to ventral, inguinal, and paraesophageal hernia repairs. Residents were notified of the summative quiz three weeks prior and provided with reference materials specific to quiz questions. Anonymous Likert-type surveys were distributed to staff and residents between 3/2023 and 3/2024. Responses were assessed based on the overall score as well as individual domains and then compared based on whether they were completed before or after implementation of the quiz.

Results: 17 seniors and 29 juniors rotated on service and all completed the pre-rotation quiz between 7/1/2023-3/4/2024. The mean first attempt score was 72%(± 12.4%) for junior residents and 88.4%(± 9.6%) for senior residents. Staff reported overall resident knowledge improved after quiz implementation (maximum 90, mean(SD): 46.25(± 8.58) vs. 75.5(± 11.24),p = 0.05). Sixteen(45.7%) residents responded to the survey before quiz implementation and 23(50%) after. Residents only reported improved knowledge regarding current literature (maximum 5, mean(SD):3.2 ± 0.98 vs. 3.8 ± 0.78,p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Implementing a pre-rotation quiz effectively improves staff perception of resident knowledge and preparation.

简介:尽管疝修补术在外科培训中占了很大比重,但围绕腹壁重建(AWR)或食道旁疝修补术等更复杂疝概念的教育可能还很欠缺。我们为腹壁重建和微创手术服务的住院医师开发并实施了轮转前测验。我们还调查了员工和住院医师对实施问答前后住院医师对轮转知识和经验的看法:多选问答题由临床和研究研究员编写,经四名员工、两名研究员和两名资深住院医师验证后于2023年6月实施。问题主要评估腹腔、腹股沟和食道旁疝修补术的解剖知识、手术步骤、网片材料、临床试验和术后管理。住院医师会在三周前收到总结性测验的通知,并获得与测验问题相关的参考资料。在 2023 年 3 月至 2024 年 3 月期间,向员工和住院医师发放了匿名李克特式调查问卷。根据总分和单个领域的回答进行评估,然后根据他们是在测验实施之前还是之后完成的进行比较:17 名大四学生和 29 名大三学生轮转服务,他们都在 2023 年 1 月 7 日至 2024 年 4 月 3 日期间完成了轮转前测验。初级住院医师的首次尝试平均得分率为 72%(± 12.4%),高级住院医师为 88.4%(± 9.6%)。工作人员表示,在实施小测验后,住院医师的总体知识水平有所提高(最多 90 人,平均(标清):46.25(± 8.58)分 vs 75.5(± 11.24)分,p = 0.05)。16 名住院医师(45.7%)在测验实施前回答了调查问卷,23 名住院医师(50%)在测验实施后回答了调查问卷。住院医师仅表示对当前文献的了解有所提高(最多 5 人,平均(标清):3.2 ± 0.98 vs. 3.8 ± 0.78,p = 0.04):实施轮转前测验可有效改善工作人员对住院医师知识和准备情况的感知。
{"title":"The development, implementation, and evaluation of a pre-rotation quiz to improve resident preparedness for an abdominal wall reconstruction surgical rotation.","authors":"Sara M Maskal, Nicole E Brooks, Ryan C Ellis, Megan Melland-Smith, Nir Messer, Benjamin T Miller, Lucas R A Beffa, Clayton C Petro, Ajita S Prabhu, Michael J Rosen","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03189-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03189-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although hernia repair constitutes a significant portion of surgical training, education around more complex hernia concepts such as abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) or paraesophageal hernia repair may be lacking. We developed and implemented a pre-rotation quiz for residents on an AWR and minimally invasive surgery service. We also investigated the staff and resident perception of resident knowledge and experience of the rotation before and after quiz implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The multiple-choice quiz questions were written by clinical and research fellows, validated by four staff, two fellows, and two senior residents and implemented in June 2023. Questions assessed knowledge of anatomy, operative steps, mesh materials, clinical trials, and postoperative management specific to ventral, inguinal, and paraesophageal hernia repairs. Residents were notified of the summative quiz three weeks prior and provided with reference materials specific to quiz questions. Anonymous Likert-type surveys were distributed to staff and residents between 3/2023 and 3/2024. Responses were assessed based on the overall score as well as individual domains and then compared based on whether they were completed before or after implementation of the quiz.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17 seniors and 29 juniors rotated on service and all completed the pre-rotation quiz between 7/1/2023-3/4/2024. The mean first attempt score was 72%(± 12.4%) for junior residents and 88.4%(± 9.6%) for senior residents. Staff reported overall resident knowledge improved after quiz implementation (maximum 90, mean(SD): 46.25(± 8.58) vs. 75.5(± 11.24),p = 0.05). Sixteen(45.7%) residents responded to the survey before quiz implementation and 23(50%) after. Residents only reported improved knowledge regarding current literature (maximum 5, mean(SD):3.2 ± 0.98 vs. 3.8 ± 0.78,p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a pre-rotation quiz effectively improves staff perception of resident knowledge and preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment to: Drain versus no drain in elective open incisional hernia operations. 发表评论:选择性开放切口疝手术中的引流与无引流。
IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03209-3
Uday Singh Dadhwal
{"title":"Comment to: Drain versus no drain in elective open incisional hernia operations.","authors":"Uday Singh Dadhwal","doi":"10.1007/s10029-024-03209-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-03209-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Hernia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1