Indian Journal of Gastroenterology最新文献

Introduction: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (uEMR) represents an alternative to conventional EMR for resection of sessile colorectal polyps. We aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of uEMR for sessile colorectal polyps.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of endoscopy database was done for patients who underwent uEMR for sessile colorectal polyps more than 10 mm in size without any features of sub-mucosal invasion from two tertiary care centres in western India between January 2021 and June 2023. Exclusion criteria were other modes of endoscopic resection. Primary outcome was rate of en bloc resection. Secondary outcomes were complete resection rate, adverse events and recurrence rate.

Results: During the study period, 159 patients with 261 lesions met the study inclusion. Mean lesion size was 1.935 ± 0.71 cm with most lesion located in the rectum (75, 28.73%) followed by sigmoid colon (69, 26.43%). Most lesions had a Paris 0-Is morphology (192, 73.56%). Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) IIa pattern was seen on narrow band imaging (NBI) in 221 (84.67%) lesions. Complete resection was achieved in 98.46% lesions (257/261). En bloc resection was achieved in 91.82% (236/257) lesions. Complications were seen in 6.8%, all of which were managed endoscopically. Recurrence was seen in 3.1% of polyps on follow-up.

Conclusion: uEMR is a safe and efficacious technique for endoscopic resection for sessile colorectal polyps with high rates of en bloc resection for polyps more than 10 mm size.

Introduction: The role of endo-biliary radio-frequency ablation (EB-RFA) in treating malignant biliary strictures remains a subject of controversy. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of EB-RFA in conjunction with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) compared to SEMS alone.

Methods: This single-center prospective pragmatic comparative study, conducted between June 2021 and November 2022, involved 23 patients undergoing EB-RFA plus SEMS and 48 patients undergoing SEMS for unresectable malignant hilar obstruction. The study evaluated overall survival, stent patency and adverse events.

Results: Seventy-one patients (mean age [SD], 57.8 [11.2] years; 73.2% men) were enrolled. The clinical success rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (78.3% in EB-RFA and 66.6% in SEMS; p 0.316). The median (95% CI) overall survival was 155 (79.87-230.13) days in the EB-RFA group, contrasting with 86.0 (78.06-123.94) days in the SEMS group (p 0.020). The presence of carcinoma gallbladder (p 0.035; HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.96) and EB-RFA (p 0.047; HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.01-3.49) independently predicted overall survival. Median (95% CI) stent patency was 143.0 (95% CI, 61.61-224.39) days in the EB-RFA group compared to 78.0 (95% CI, 32.74-123.26) days in the SEMS group (p 0.019). The presence of carcinoma gallbladder (p 0.046, HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.99), EB-RFA (p 0.023; HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10-3.36) and chemotherapy (p 0.017, HR 1.91; 95% CI, 1.12-3.26) independently predicted longer stent patency. There was no difference in procedure-related adverse events in both groups.

Conclusion: EB-RFA with SEMS placement proves to be a safe and effective technique for palliative biliary decompression in patients with malignant biliary strictures, demonstrating superior overall survival and stent patency compared to SEMS alone. Further confirmation through multi-center trials is warranted.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05320328).

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS FNA) is the first-line modality to diagnose suspected solid pancreatic malignant lesions. Elastography-guided FNA has been shown to improve the diagnostic yield of EUS FNA but prospective studies are limited. The aim of the study was to compare diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of conventional and elastography-guided EUS FNA in patients with suspected malignant pancreatic solid masses.

Methods: Patients with suspected malignant solid pancreatic lesions presenting to our institute from July 2021 to January 2023 were recruited and randomized to conventional and elastography-guided EUS FNA using a 22-G EUS FNA needle. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

Results: Total 48 patients were initially screened for inclusion in the study, of which six were excluded and 42 patients underwent randomization. Finally, 20 patients in each group underwent the assigned intervention and were analyzed further. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in conventional FNA and elastography-guided FNA group with median age 52 (range 29-74) years and 51.8 (range 31-72) years, respectively, males being 70% and 75%, respectively. Median size of the lesion was 34 mm (range 14-48 mm) and 37 (range 18 to 50 mm), respectively, for both conventional and elastography arm. The average size of the lesion was 35.7 mm. Overall, the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was made in 65% of cases. In the remaining cases, diagnoses were inflammatory mass, Castleman's disease, solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (SPEN), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), pancreatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and metastasis. Conventional EUS FNA had diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 90%, 87.5%, 100%, 100% and 62.92%, respectively, and elastography-guided EUS FNA had diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 85%, 100%, 100% and 54.59%, respectively. No severe adverse events were noted.

Conclusion: There is no significant difference between conventional and elastography-guided EUS FNA in terms of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. Both techniques appear safe and effective for characterizing solid pancreatic masses and elastography did not score numerically over the conventional arm.

Background: Antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury (ATDILI) is a significant problem of tuberculosis treatment. This systematic review and meta‑analysis aimed at evaluating the incidence and risk factors of ATDILI in adult patients with tuberculosis in India.

Methods: Five electronic databases were searched comprehensively for studies on Indian adult patients with tuberculosis investigating the incidence and/or risk factors of ATDILI. The relevant data was pooled in a random or fixed-effect model to calculate the pooled incidence with a 95% confidence interval (CI), standardized mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR).

Results: Following the screening of 3221 records, 43 studies with 12,041 tuberculosis patients were finally included. Based on the random effect model, the pooled incidence of ATDILI was 12.6% (95% CI, 9.9-15.3%, p < 0.001, I² = 95.1%). The pooled incidence was higher in patients with daily treatment regimen compared to the thrice weekly regimen (16.5% vs. 3.5%). The concurrent hepatitis B or C infection, alcohol consumption and underlying chronic liver disease were associated with high incidence of ATDILI. The pooled incidence of acute liver failure (ALF) among ATDILI patients was 6.78% (95% CI 3.9-9.5%). Female gender (OR 1.24), older age (MD 0.26), lean body mass index (OR 3.8), hypoalbuminemia (OR 3.09), N-acetyltransferase slow acetylator genotypes (OR 2.3) and glutathione S-transferases M null mutation (OR 1.6) were found to be associated with an increased risk of ATDILI. The pooled mortality rate of ATDILI patients was 1.72% (95% CI 0.4-3.0%) overall and 71.8% (95% CI 49.3-94.2%) in case of ALF.

Conclusion: Overall, 12.6% patients of tuberculosis in India developed ATDILI when combination of first-line antituberculosis drugs was used. An average of 7% of ATDILI patients progressed to ALF which had a high mortality rate. Older age, female, poor nutritional status and some genetic polymorphisms were identified as significant risk factors.