Indian Journal of Gastroenterology最新文献

Third space endoscopy (TSE) or sub-mucosal endoscopy using a mucosal flap valve (SEMF) enables the endoscopist to operate in the deeper layers of the gastrointestinal tract or gain access to the mediastinal/peritoneal cavity for natural orifice transoral endoscopic surgery (NOTES). TSE procedures are essentially endoscopic surgical procedures with a variable learning curve. Adverse events (AEs) during TSE are specific and follow a certain pattern across the spectrum of TSE procedures. These can be broadly categorized according to either type of AE, time of presentation relative to the procedure or according to degree of severity. Three major categories of AEs encountered during TSE include insufflation related AEs, mucosal injuries (MIs) and bleeding. Other relevant AEs include infectious complications, aspiration pneumonia, post-procedural chest/abdominal pain, atelectasis, cardiac arrhythmias, pleural effusion and pulmonary embolism. Reported incidence of AEs during TSE procedures varies according to the type and complexity of procedure. Acquaintance regarding potential risk factors, technical tips and precautions, alarm signs for early recognition, assessment of degree of severity, morphological characterization of AEs and finally, expeditious selection of appropriate management strategy are crucial and imperative for successful clinical outcomes. The current review discusses the current evidence and practical guidelines for prevention, early detection and management of TSE-related AEs.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved from a diagnostic to an interventional modality, allowing precise vascular access and therapy. EUS-guided vascular access of the portal vein has received increasing attention in recent years as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient directly measures the hepatic vein portal pressure gradient and is crucial for understanding of liver function and prognostication of liver disease. EUS facilitates the sampling of portal venous blood to obtain circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in pancreatobiliary malignancies. This technique aids in the diagnosis and staging of cancers. EUS-guided interventions have a substantial potential for diagnosing portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. EUS-guided coil and glue embolization have higher efficacy for the treatment of gastric varices than direct endoscopic glue. Pseudoaneurysm (PsA), a rare vascular complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis, is typically managed with interventional radiology (IR)-guided embolization and surgery. EUS is increasingly used in specialized centers for non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly for pseudoaneurysm-related bleeding. There is limited data on EUS-guided intervention for bleeding ectopic varices, rectal varices and Dieulafoy lesions, but it is becoming more widely accepted. In this extensive review, we evaluated both current and potential future applications of EUS-guided vascular interventions, including EUS-guided gastric variceal bleed therapy, rectal and ectopic varices, pseudoaneurysmal bleeding, splenic artery embolization, portal pressure gradient measurement, portal vein sampling for CTCs, fine needle aspiration of PVTT, intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement, liver tumor ablation and EUS-guided cardiac intervention.

Introduction: Neuroendocrine neoplasms of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and pancreas are heterogenous tumors. World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 classification introduced Grade (G)3 neuroendocrine tumor (NET) distinct from neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), based on molecular differences and to triage the patients for appropriate therapy. This distinction largely relies on morphology, which can be challenging at times. Genomic profiling has revealed TP53 and RB1 mutations in NECs, while death domain-associated protein 6 (DAXX) and alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX), in G3NET. Their role as biological markers in differentiating these entities and their significance as prognostic markers are not yet established. This study aims at analyzing the diagnostic and prognostic role of p53 and ATRX in neuroendocrine neoplasms of GIT and pancreas.

Methodology: A single-centre, eight-year retrospective study of neuroendocrine neoplasm of GIT and pancreas comprised G2NET, G3NET and NEC. Tumor slides were stained by immunohistochemistry for p53 and ATRX. Strong nuclear staining of > 50% of tumor cells for p53 was considered mutated. Nuclear staining of ATRX in < 5% of tumor cells was considered ATRX loss. Expression of p53 and ATRX was analyzed and correlated with tumor grades and patient survival.

Results: Fifty-five patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm were studied, comprising G2NET (58%), G3NET (16%) and NEC (26%). Median age of diagnosis was 59 years with male predominance. The pancreas was the most common site followed by the small bowel. NEC showed lower survival compared to G3 and G2NET. Mutated p53 immunohistochemical expression was more frequent among NEC than G3NET. Patients with mutated p53 had significantly lower survival irrespective of the grade (p = 0.001). There was no association of ATRX loss with grade or survival.

Conclusion: G3NETs are genetically different from NECs. Use of immunohistochemistry for p53 in addition to histomorphology may facilitate accurate categorization of NEC and G3NET. Mutated p53 may also be used as an independent prognostic marker in neuroendocrine tumors of GIT and pancreas.

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is associated with a significant global health burden and high mortality rates when diagnosed at later stages. The diagnosis often occurs at advanced stages when treatment options are limited and less effective. Early detection strategies are crucial to improving survival rates and outcomes for patients. Blue laser imaging (BLI) is an image-enhanced endoscopy technique that utilizes white light and narrow-band light to detect pathological changes in the mucosal architecture. This study aims at investigating the diagnostic performance of BLI for the detection of GC.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases from inception until March 2023. Studies assessing the diagnostic efficacy of BLI for GC detection were included. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of BLI were calculated using pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the I² statistic.

Results: Six studies were included in the pooled analysis. There were 708 patients with 380 GC lesions. Most of the lesions involved the lower two-thirds of the stomach. The pooled performance metrics of BLI for GC detection were as follows: sensitivity of 91.9% (95% CI 83.3-96.3%; I² = 82.3%), specificity of 93.4% (95% CI 82.0-97.8%; I² = 87.9%) and accuracy of 95.4% (95% CI 72.6-99.8%; I² = 73.6%).

Conclusion: BLI demonstrates high diagnostic efficacy for the detection of GC. BLI can be a valuable tool in clinical practice. However, large-scale, randomized controlled studies are needed to further establish the role of BLI in routine clinical practice for GC detection.

Introduction: We aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion for managing patients with benign gastric outlet obstruction (GOO).

Methods: This prospective interventional study included 23 patients. All consecutive treatment-naïve symptomatic patients with benign GOO were recruited. Fully covered SEMS were deployed across the stricture under fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance. Technical success, clinical success and sustained treatment response (STR) were assessed. Technical success was defined as the successful deployment of SEMS at the desired anatomic location. Clinical success was defined as the resolution of symptoms and an increase in Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) of at least 1 point from the baseline score on Day 7. STR was assessed at four and eight weeks post stent removal in patients who had a response at week four. Factors associated with stent migration and non-response at week four were also assessed.

Results: The median age of the study population was 30 years (range 19-65 years). Males constituted 65.22%. Most patients presented with vomiting (100%) and abdominal pain (95.65%). Peptic stricture was most common etiology for GOO (60.9%) followed by tubercular (26.1%) and corrosive (13%). Most common site of obstruction was junction of first and second part of duodenum (69.57%) followed by pyloric (30.43%). Median length of stricture was 2 cm (range 1.5-4). Technical success was achieved in all 23 patients (100%). Clinical success was achieved in 21 patients (91.3%). Response at Day 28 was seen in 20 patients (86.95%). Eighteen of 20 (90%) patients who had a response at week four had STR at week four and week eight after stent removal. Stent migration occurred in five (21.7%) patients. On univariate analysis, stricture length, calibre and stent length were found to predict migration.

Conclusions: Fully covered SEMS was an effective and safe management modality in patients with benign GOO. Stent migration remains a troublesome disadvantage.

Lumen-apposing metal stents have ushered a new frontier for interventional endoscopic ultrasound. Initial use for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections has rapidly expanded to the bile duct, gallbladder and small bowel. Intra-luminal applications for short strictures have also emerged. Electrocautery enhancement has made the stent delivery speedy. While the advent of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has brought a paradigm shift in the practice of interventional endoscopic ultrasound, their use is associated with certain technicalities that any advanced endosonologist should know. Understanding indications for LAMS is critical and their use in appropriate settings. Troubleshooting in tricky situations is always a challenge and the background considerations for their use include knowing the target organ, cautery and puncture technique, managing partially opened LAMS and also managing maldeployment. In this review, we discuss the intricacies and technical tips for the use of lumen-apposing metal stents.

Background: Endoscopic resection is currently the treatment of choice for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). Endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection (ESD) can achieve higher enbloc resection and R0 resection, albeit at a slightly higher risk of complications. Given scarce data on ESD from India, we performed a retrospective analysis of our experience with colorectal ESD (CR-ESD) to know its clinical efficacy and complications as well as to assess the learning curve of CR-ESD in non-endemic-areas.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained datasheet performed. All patients with large (>2cm), complex or recurrent colorectal LST who underwent ESD at our center between 2012 and 2021 were included in the study. Various baseline lesion-related parameters, procedure-related parameters, enbloc resection (ER) rates, R0 margins and adverse event rates were retrieved. CUSUM analysis was performed to calculate the minimum required procedures to achieve competency in CR-ESD.

Results: Total 149 patients were included in the study; mean patient age was 61.36±18.21 years. Most patients had lesions in rectum (n=102; 68.5%) followed by sigmoid colon (n=25; 16.8%). The mean lesion size was 46.62 ± 25.46 mm and the mean procedure duration for ESD was 219.30 ± 150.05 min. ER was achieved in 94.6% of lesions. R0 resection was achieved in 132 patients (88.6%). Overall, six (4%) adverse events were noted, of which one required surgical intervention. As many as 105 patients (70.5%) had adenomatous lesions on histology. Seventy-four patients underwent follow-up colonoscopy, of which three had a recurrence of adenomatous lesions and five had post-resection stricture requiring endoscopic dilation. CUSUM curve analysis calculated the learning curve for ESD was 47 resections for ER and 55 for the occurrence of AEs, with a composite CUSUM at 47 procedures.

Conclusion: CR-ESD even in non-endemic area is associated with high en bloc resection rates, R0 resection rates and acceptable complication profile. Approximately 50 cases of CR-ESD are required to achieve competency.

Small intestine, hitherto an obscure area for endoscopists before 2000, is now easily evaluated non-invasively using capsule endoscopy and invasively by device-assisted enteroscopies. Major advances in understanding the causes and management of small bowel diseases have been in obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleed, currently re-named as small bowel bleed, after the discovery of capsule endoscopy. The current article is a narrative review of the technology of capsule endoscopy, its advantages and limitations, future perspective and Indian studies on its utility in patients with small bowel bleed. Till date, eight large series reporting 2319 patients with obscure GI bleed (1554 overt and 765 occult) undergoing capsule endoscopy have been reported from India. Overall yield of capsule endoscopy to detect lesions in these studies varied from 43.5% to 90%. The major causes detected in various studies for small bowel bleed include vascular malformation, portal hypertensive enteropathy, ulcer, stricture, tumor, polyps, etc. Hookworm can cause both occult as well as overt small bowel bleed as shown mainly from India. Capsule endoscopy has also been quite safe in patients with small bowel bleed as despite 0.6% to 15% retention of imaging capsule in Indian studies, development of clinically evident small bowel obstruction has rarely been reported. The major limitations of capsule endoscopy include lack of maneuvrability and therapeutic capability. Research is in progress to overcome some of the limitations of the current capsule endoscopy system. It is concluded that discovery of capsule endoscopy has brought a new paradigm in GI endoscopy and explored a hitherto unexplored area of GI tract, i.e. small bowel that continued to be a black box for the endoscopists.