Objective: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) may require one-lung ventilation (OLV) during minithoracotomy. One of the problems associated with MICS is postoperative unilateral pulmonary edema of the collapsed lung, which may be fatal. Several reports have demonstrated the effects of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) on lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. In this study, we created an in vivo pig model using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and OLV, enabling us to compare bilateral lung injury at the same time point in the same individual. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of inhaled NO in a model that approximates MICS.
Methods: Ten pigs were subjected to 3 h of CPB and OLV with clamping of the main pulmonary artery. The bilateral lungs of the pigs were categorized into 4 groups according to their ventilation status and the presence or absence of NO inhalation (n = 5 per group). Lungs were collected after the experiment, and inflammatory cytokine measurements and pathological evaluations were performed.
Results: In the OLV group (group 1 vs 2), the levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and myeloperoxidase in collapsed lung tissue increased, along with an increase in the number of apoptotic cells and exacerbation of pulmonary edema. In the collapsed lungs (group 2 vs 4), NO inhalation reduced the levels of interleukin-6 and myeloperoxidase, the number of apoptotic cells, and pulmonary edema.
Conclusions: In an animal model using a combination of CPB and OLV, inhaled NO suppressed pulmonary edema and improved the exacerbated lung injury of collapsed lungs.
{"title":"Inhaled Nitric Oxide Reduces Lung Injury During Cardiac Surgery With One-Lung Ventilation in an Experimental Pig Model.","authors":"Hiroshi Mitsuo, Tomoki Ushijima, Hikaru Uchiyama, Kensaku Matsuda, Takuya Nishijima, Masayuki Shimada, Yusuke Nakata, Noriko Fujimoto, Kunihiko Joo, Yusuke Ando, Tatsushi Onzuka, Satoshi Kimura, Hiromichi Sonoda, Akira Shiose","doi":"10.1177/15569845251405829","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845251405829","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) may require one-lung ventilation (OLV) during minithoracotomy. One of the problems associated with MICS is postoperative unilateral pulmonary edema of the collapsed lung, which may be fatal. Several reports have demonstrated the effects of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) on lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. In this study, we created an in vivo pig model using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and OLV, enabling us to compare bilateral lung injury at the same time point in the same individual. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of inhaled NO in a model that approximates MICS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten pigs were subjected to 3 h of CPB and OLV with clamping of the main pulmonary artery. The bilateral lungs of the pigs were categorized into 4 groups according to their ventilation status and the presence or absence of NO inhalation (<i>n</i> = 5 per group). Lungs were collected after the experiment, and inflammatory cytokine measurements and pathological evaluations were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the OLV group (group 1 vs 2), the levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and myeloperoxidase in collapsed lung tissue increased, along with an increase in the number of apoptotic cells and exacerbation of pulmonary edema. In the collapsed lungs (group 2 vs 4), NO inhalation reduced the levels of interleukin-6 and myeloperoxidase, the number of apoptotic cells, and pulmonary edema.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an animal model using a combination of CPB and OLV, inhaled NO suppressed pulmonary edema and improved the exacerbated lung injury of collapsed lungs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15569845251405829"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1177/15569845251407558
Viktoriia Tymoshenko, Aldo J Suria, Gianluca Dimonte, Sahra Tasdelen, Thomas Poschner, Kyle C Purrman, Siyavush Saidian, Martin Andreas
Objective: The Bentall procedure is a well-established surgical technique for managing aortic root disease involving the ascending aorta and aortic valve. The use of automated suturing technology may facilitate ergonomic, reliable suture placement, especially in minimally invasive approaches. Here we present the results of a study to evaluate the feasibility of using automated suturing technology for Bentall procedures in an ex vivo porcine model using a passive beating heart simulator.
Methods: This study included 20 ex vivo porcine hearts, divided into an automated suturing cohort (n = 10) and a manual suturing cohort (n = 10). A Bentall procedure was performed on each heart, with the subject automated suturing technology used in place of manual suturing in the first cohort. After the procedure, each heart was tested in a passive beating heart testing simulator under increasingly challenging hemodynamic conditions (80, 100, and 120 mm Hg); any fluid leakage at the proximal anastomosis was quantified. Data were analyzed using nonparametric statistical tests.
Results: Overall, leakage from the proximal anastomosis increased with higher pressure and longer duration in both groups (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in leakage between the automated and manual suture cohorts (P > 0.05), indicating that the study technology appears to be feasible and effective for placing sutures in Bentall procedures. Correlation analysis indicated a moderate positive relationship between aortic pressure and leakage in both groups.
Conclusions: The subject automated suturing technology demonstrated comparable performance to manual suturing in ex vivo Bentall procedures, with no significantly different leakage across a range of increasing aortic pressures.
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy of Automated Suturing Technology for Bentall Procedures in a Passive Beating Heart Model.","authors":"Viktoriia Tymoshenko, Aldo J Suria, Gianluca Dimonte, Sahra Tasdelen, Thomas Poschner, Kyle C Purrman, Siyavush Saidian, Martin Andreas","doi":"10.1177/15569845251407558","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845251407558","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Bentall procedure is a well-established surgical technique for managing aortic root disease involving the ascending aorta and aortic valve. The use of automated suturing technology may facilitate ergonomic, reliable suture placement, especially in minimally invasive approaches. Here we present the results of a study to evaluate the feasibility of using automated suturing technology for Bentall procedures in an ex vivo porcine model using a passive beating heart simulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 20 ex vivo porcine hearts, divided into an automated suturing cohort (<i>n</i> = 10) and a manual suturing cohort (<i>n</i> = 10). A Bentall procedure was performed on each heart, with the subject automated suturing technology used in place of manual suturing in the first cohort. After the procedure, each heart was tested in a passive beating heart testing simulator under increasingly challenging hemodynamic conditions (80, 100, and 120 mm Hg); any fluid leakage at the proximal anastomosis was quantified. Data were analyzed using nonparametric statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, leakage from the proximal anastomosis increased with higher pressure and longer duration in both groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in leakage between the automated and manual suture cohorts (<i>P</i> > 0.05), indicating that the study technology appears to be feasible and effective for placing sutures in Bentall procedures. Correlation analysis indicated a moderate positive relationship between aortic pressure and leakage in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The subject automated suturing technology demonstrated comparable performance to manual suturing in ex vivo Bentall procedures, with no significantly different leakage across a range of increasing aortic pressures.</p>","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15569845251407558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1177/15569845251410549
Alexander Pohlman, Madison Lozanoski, Bilal Odeh, Zaid M Abdelsattar
{"title":"Using Augmented Reality to Guide Complex Chest Wall Resection With Simplified Single-Patch Reconstruction.","authors":"Alexander Pohlman, Madison Lozanoski, Bilal Odeh, Zaid M Abdelsattar","doi":"10.1177/15569845251410549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845251410549","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15569845251410549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1177/15569845251400765
Abdullah Almehandi, Mohammed Ramadhan, Yahya Ali, Abdulaziz Almhanedi, Abdulrahman Osama Al-Naseem, Ahmad Gonnah, Ahmad Awad, Johannes Fischer, Hristo Kirov, Torsten Doenst, Rakan I Nazer, Tulio Caldonazo
Objective: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery for mitral valve (MV) disease is a rising strategy. Axillary access is linked to reduced pain and faster recovery, but its efficacy and safety compared with median sternotomy for MV surgery (MVS) remain unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of MVS via axillary access and median sternotomy.
Methods: Four databases were analyzed. The primary endpoint was perioperative mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times, rethoracotomy, wound complications, mechanical ventilation duration, stroke, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and residual moderate mitral regurgitation. A random-effects model was used.
Results: We included 2,129 patients from 4 studies, with 1,135 (53.3%) undergoing axillary access. Perioperative mortality was comparable between approaches (odds ratio [OR] = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09 to 1.23, P = 0.10). Axillary access was associated with longer CPB times (mean difference [MD] = 16.38, 95% CI: 6.42 to 26.34, P = 0.001), fewer wound complications (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.80, P = 0.009), shorter ventilation time (MD = -4.93, 95% CI: -8.79 to -1.08, P < 0.01), and shorter hospital (MD = -0.78, 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.14, P = 0.02) and ICU stays (MD = -10.84, 95% CI: -19.54 to -2.14, P = 0.01). No difference was found in cross-clamp time, rethoracotomy, stroke, or residual mitral regurgitation.
Conclusions: Axillary access for MVS shows comparable mortality to median sternotomy, with benefits in wound complications, ventilation, and recovery but longer CPB times. Further research is needed to confirm long-term safety and efficacy.
目的:微创心脏手术治疗二尖瓣疾病是一种新兴的治疗策略。腋窝入路与减轻疼痛和更快恢复有关,但与正中胸骨切开术相比,其有效性和安全性尚不清楚。我们进行了一项meta分析,比较经腋窝通道和正中胸骨切开术的MVS的临床结果。方法:对4个数据库进行分析。主要终点是围手术期死亡率。次要终点包括体外循环(CPB)和交叉钳夹次数、开胸手术、伤口并发症、机械通气时间、卒中、住院和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间以及残余中度二尖瓣返流。采用随机效应模型。结果:我们纳入了来自4项研究的2129例患者,其中1135例(53.3%)接受了腋窝通路。两种方法的围手术期死亡率具有可比性(优势比[OR] = 0.34, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.09 ~ 1.23, P = 0.10)。腋窝通路与CPB次数较长(平均差值[MD] = 16.38, 95% CI: 6.42 ~ 26.34, P = 0.001)、伤口并发症较少(OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21 ~ 0.80, P = 0.009)、通气时间较短(MD = -4.93, 95% CI: -8.79 ~ -1.08, P < 0.01)、住院时间较短(MD = -0.78, 95% CI: -1.41 ~ -0.14, P = 0.02)和ICU住院时间较短(MD = -10.84, 95% CI: -19.54 ~ -2.14, P = 0.01)相关。在交叉夹持时间、开胸术、卒中或残留二尖瓣返流方面没有发现差异。结论:腋窝入路与正中胸骨切开术的死亡率相当,在伤口并发症、通气和恢复方面有好处,但CPB时间更长。需要进一步的研究来确认长期的安全性和有效性。
{"title":"Axillary Versus Sternotomy Access in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Abdullah Almehandi, Mohammed Ramadhan, Yahya Ali, Abdulaziz Almhanedi, Abdulrahman Osama Al-Naseem, Ahmad Gonnah, Ahmad Awad, Johannes Fischer, Hristo Kirov, Torsten Doenst, Rakan I Nazer, Tulio Caldonazo","doi":"10.1177/15569845251400765","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845251400765","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive cardiac surgery for mitral valve (MV) disease is a rising strategy. Axillary access is linked to reduced pain and faster recovery, but its efficacy and safety compared with median sternotomy for MV surgery (MVS) remain unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of MVS via axillary access and median sternotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were analyzed. The primary endpoint was perioperative mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times, rethoracotomy, wound complications, mechanical ventilation duration, stroke, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and residual moderate mitral regurgitation. A random-effects model was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2,129 patients from 4 studies, with 1,135 (53.3%) undergoing axillary access. Perioperative mortality was comparable between approaches (odds ratio [OR] = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09 to 1.23, <i>P</i> = 0.10). Axillary access was associated with longer CPB times (mean difference [MD] = 16.38, 95% CI: 6.42 to 26.34, <i>P</i> = 0.001), fewer wound complications (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.80, <i>P</i> = 0.009), shorter ventilation time (MD = -4.93, 95% CI: -8.79 to -1.08, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and shorter hospital (MD = -0.78, 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.14, <i>P</i> = 0.02) and ICU stays (MD = -10.84, 95% CI: -19.54 to -2.14, <i>P</i> = 0.01). No difference was found in cross-clamp time, rethoracotomy, stroke, or residual mitral regurgitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Axillary access for MVS shows comparable mortality to median sternotomy, with benefits in wound complications, ventilation, and recovery but longer CPB times. Further research is needed to confirm long-term safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"15569845251400765"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146062691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-06-30DOI: 10.1177/15569845251350280
Hugo Monteiro Neder Issa, Andres Parisi, Daniel Goubran, Marc Ruel
{"title":"The 10 Commandments of Robotic Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting.","authors":"Hugo Monteiro Neder Issa, Andres Parisi, Daniel Goubran, Marc Ruel","doi":"10.1177/15569845251350280","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15569845251350280","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"511-516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12701903/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144527793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-07-14DOI: 10.1177/15569845251352817
John J Kelly, Brittany J Cannon, Grace J Wang, Nimesh D Desai
{"title":"How I Do It: Zone 2 Arch With Sequential Single-Branch TEVAR for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.","authors":"John J Kelly, Brittany J Cannon, Grace J Wang, Nimesh D Desai","doi":"10.1177/15569845251352817","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15569845251352817","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12701908/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144626180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-03DOI: 10.1177/15569845251382589
Oleksandr Babliak, Dmytro Babliak, Serhii Yatsuk
{"title":"Transaortic Partial Septectomy via Right Anterior Minithoracotomy for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Oleksandr Babliak, Dmytro Babliak, Serhii Yatsuk","doi":"10.1177/15569845251382589","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15569845251382589","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145212598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-21DOI: 10.1177/15569845251364258
Ryaan El-Andari, Michael C Moon
{"title":"E-vita Open Neo Hybrid Stent Graft Implantation Technique.","authors":"Ryaan El-Andari, Michael C Moon","doi":"10.1177/15569845251364258","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15569845251364258","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"532"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12701896/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144952758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-03DOI: 10.1177/15569845251382590
Luigi Marano, Sergii Girnyi, Tomasz Cwalinski, Marek Strzemski, Karol Polom, Mateusz Wilcowski, Jaroslaw Skokowski
{"title":"Precision Surgery: Robotic, Augmented Reality, and 3D-Printed Approaches to Complex Giant Hiatal Hernia With Mesenteroaxial Volvulus.","authors":"Luigi Marano, Sergii Girnyi, Tomasz Cwalinski, Marek Strzemski, Karol Polom, Mateusz Wilcowski, Jaroslaw Skokowski","doi":"10.1177/15569845251382590","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15569845251382590","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"601-602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145212574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}