Infectious Diseases and Therapy最新文献

The spread of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative pathogens, especially those producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), has become a major health concern. MBLs are molecularly the most diverse carbapenemases, produced by a wide spectrum of gram-negative organisms, including the Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and can hydrolyze most β-lactams using metal ion cofactors in their active sites. Over the years, the prevalence of MBL-carrying isolates has increased globally, particularly in Asia. MBL infections are associated with adverse clinical outcomes including longer length of hospital stay, ICU admission, and increased mortality across the globe. The optimal treatment for MBL infections not only depends on the pathogen but also on the underlying resistance mechanisms. Currently, there are only few drugs or drug combinations that can efficiently offset MBL-mediated resistance, which makes the treatment of MBL infections challenging. The rising concern of MBLs along with the limited treatment options has led to the need and development of drugs that are specifically targeted towards MBLs. This review discusses the prevalence of MBLs, their clinical impact, and the current treatment options for MBL infections and their limitations. Furthermore, this review will discuss agents currently in the pipeline for treatment of MBL infections.

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused unprecedented pressure on healthcare systems globally. The lack of quality guidelines on the management of COVID-19 in rheumatologic disease, renal disease, hematological malignancy, and solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in a wide variation in clinical practice.

Methods: Using a Delphi process, a panel of 16 key opinion leaders developed clinical practice statements regarding vaccine recommendations in areas where standards are absent or limited. Agreement among practicing physicians with consensus statements was also assessed via an online physician survey. The strength of the consensus was determined by the following rating system: a strong rating was defined as all four key opinion leaders (KOLs) rating the statement ≥ 8, a moderate rating was defined as three out of four KOLs rating the statement ≥ 8, and no consensus was defined as less than three out of four KOLs provided a rating of ≤ 8. Specialists voted on agreement with each consensus statement for their disease area using the same ten-point scoring system.

Results: Key opinion leaders in rheumatology, nephrology, and hematology achieved consensuses for all nine statements pertaining to the primary and booster series with transplant physicians reaching consensus on eight of nine statements. Experts agreed that COVID-19 vaccines are safe, effective, and well tolerated by patients with rheumatological conditions, renal disease, hematologic malignancy, and recipients of solid organ transplants. The Delphi process yielded strong to moderate suggestions for the use of COVID-19 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines and the necessity of the COVID-19 booster for the immunocompromised population. The expert panel had mixed feelings concerning the measurement of antibody titers, higher-dose mRNA vaccines, and the development of disease-specific COVID-19 guidance.

Conclusions: These results confirmed the necessity of COVID-19 vaccines and boosters in immunocompromised patients with rheumatologic disease, renal disease, hematological malignancy, and solid organ transplant recipients. Statements where consensus was not achieved were due to absent or limited evidence.

Introduction: We aimed to describe the risk profile of RSV infections among children aged ≤ 24 months in Valladolid from January 2010 to August 2022 and to compare them with influenza and COVID-19 controls.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all laboratory-confirmed RSV, influenza, and COVID-19 infections. We analyzed risk factors for RSV hospitalization and severity (length-of-stay ≥ 8 days, intensive-care-unit admission, in-hospital death or readmission < 30 days) and compared severity between hospitalized RSV patients vs. influenza and COVID-19 controls using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: We included 1507 patients with RSV (1274 inpatient), 32 with influenza, and 52 COVID-19 controls. Hospitalized RSV (mean age 5.3 months) and COVID-19 (4 months) were younger than influenza (9.1 months) patients. Sixteen percent of patients had RSV within the first month of life. Most infants did not have comorbidities (74% RSV, 56% influenza, and 69% COVID-19). Forty-one percent of patients with RSV and influenza were coinfected vs. 27% COVID-19 (p = 0.04). Among RSV, hospitalization risk factors were prematurity (adjusted OR 3.11 [95% CI 1.66, 4.44]) and coinfection (2.03 [1.45, 2.85]). Risks for higher severity were maternal smoking (1.89 [1.07, 3.33]), prematurity (2.31 [1.59, 3.34]), chronic lung disease (2.20 [1.06, 4.58]), neurodevelopmental condition (4.28 [2.10, 8.73]), and coinfection (2.67 [2.09, 3.40]). Breastfeeding was protective against hospitalization (0.87 [0.80, 0.95]) and severity (0.81 [0.74, 0.88]), while complete vaccination schedule was protective against severity (0.51 [0.27, 0.97]). RSV had 2.47 (1.03, 5.96) higher risk of experiencing any severe outcome compared to influenza and did not show significant differences vs. COVID-19.

Conclusions: RSV hospitalizations were more frequent and severe than influenza, while severity was comparable to the early pandemic COVID-19. Currently, both influenza and COVID-19 vaccines are included in the maternal and childhood Spanish immunization schedule between the ages of 6 and 59 months. RSV monoclonal antibody is recommended for ≤ 6 months but a third of patients were aged 6-24 months. Maternal RSV vaccination can protect their children directly from birth and indirectly through breastfeeding.

We report the case of an acute cerebellitis following COVID-19 in 32-year-old man who presented with a life-threatening critical cerebellar syndrome contrasting with normal paraclinical findings. Despite this fulminant critical presentation, the patient fully recovered in 37 days after early treatment with high-dose steroids and intravenous immunoglobulins. This case highlights the need for clinicians to be aware of acute cerebellitis following COVID-19, despite normal laboratory, imaging and electroencephalography findings and the importance to start appropriate treatment as soon as possible.

Introduction: Diarrhea is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation, however the etiology is often not identified. Multiplex PCR assays may increase the detection of diarrheal pathogens among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), leading to improved management.

Methods: This was a retrospective before-after study, conducted in a high-volume transplant center. In September 2017, multiplex PCR assay was introduced. We reviewed all hospitalized KTRs with diarrhea during 1/2015-8/2017 (pre-GI PCR, n = 111) and 9/2017-12/2021 (GI PCR, n = 159) and followed them for 3 years. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis for predictors of pathogen identification, introducing the study period as an independent variable.

Results: Among 270 hospitalized KTRs with diarrhea, 64 (24%) had an identified diarrheal pathogen. The proportion of KTRs with an identified pathogen increased from 20% (13/64) in the pre-GI PCR to 80% (51/64) post GI PCR (p < 0.01). Of 51 KTRs with an identified pathogen in the post GI PCR, 44 (86%) were diagnosed using GI PCR. GI PCR was more likely used in younger KTRs with more recent transplantation and higher creatinine level at admission. The most common non-C. difficile diarrheal pathogens in the post-GI PCR cohort were enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (n = 23, 58%), norovirus (n = 11, 28%), and Campylobacter (n = 11, 28%). Implementing GI PCR significantly increased the detection and identification of GI pathogens (odds ratio [OR] = 21, CI 95% 10-44; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Infectious etiologies of diarrhea were identified in a higher proportion of KTRs after the implementation of GI PCR. This emphasizes the importance of integrating this diagnostic tool into diarrhea workup in KTRs.

Introduction: International guidelines recommend definitive combination antibiotic therapy for the management of serious infections involving carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter (CRAB) species. The commonly available combination options include high-dose sulbactam, polymyxins, tetracyclines, and cefiderocol. Scanty prospective data exist to support this approach.

Methods: Patients with CRAB bacteraemia, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), or both were categorized based on whether they received combination therapy or monotherapy. The 30-day mortality was compared between the two groups. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was done using propensity score (PS) for a balanced comparison between groups.

Results: Between January 2021 and May 2023, of the 161 patients with CRAB bacteraemia (n = 55, 34.2%), VAP (n = 46, 28.6%), or both (n = 60, 37.3%) who received appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy, 70% (112/161) received monotherapy, and the rest received combination therapy. The overall 30-day mortality was 62% (99/161) and not different (p = 0.76) between the combination therapy (31/49, 63.3%) and monotherapy (68/112, 60.7%) groups. The propensity score matching using IPTW did not show a statistical difference (p = 0.47) in 30-day mortality for receiving combination therapy with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) P of 1.29 (0.64, 2.58).

Conclusion: Combination therapy for CRAB infections needs further study in a randomised controlled trial, as this observational study showed no difference in 30-day mortality between monotherapy and combination therapy.