首页 > 最新文献

British Journal of Haematology最新文献

英文 中文
Confronting medical grifting: Fraudulent and unproven products and interventions in apheresis, transfusion and biotherapies 应对医疗欺诈:采血、输血和生物疗法中的欺诈和未经证实的产品和干预措施。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-11 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70194
Brian D. Adkins, Sheharyar Raza, Victoria Costa, Elizabeth S. Allen, Laura D. Stephens, Jennifer S. Woo, Garrett S. Booth, Jeremy W. Jacobs

Medical scams or grifting has long been a societal issue, though in recent years, the problem has become increasingly mainstream, especially as it relates to transfusion medicine, apheresis and biotherapies. Unfortunately, unsubstantiated medical claims, or unfounded interventions such as therapeutic plasma exchange for longevity or dangerous stem cell injections, are leading to significant medical waste and patient harm. Herein, we review contemporary medical grifts, cognitive biases and present a framework for managing these issues to ensure legitimate care and safety for patients.

医疗诈骗或诈骗长期以来一直是一个社会问题,尽管近年来,这个问题已日益成为主流,特别是当它涉及到输血、医学、血液分离和生物疗法时。不幸的是,未经证实的医疗主张或毫无根据的干预措施,如治疗性血浆交换长寿或危险的干细胞注射,正在导致严重的医疗浪费和对患者的伤害。在此,我们回顾了当代医疗礼品,认知偏见,并提出了管理这些问题的框架,以确保患者的合法护理和安全。
{"title":"Confronting medical grifting: Fraudulent and unproven products and interventions in apheresis, transfusion and biotherapies","authors":"Brian D. Adkins,&nbsp;Sheharyar Raza,&nbsp;Victoria Costa,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Allen,&nbsp;Laura D. Stephens,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Woo,&nbsp;Garrett S. Booth,&nbsp;Jeremy W. Jacobs","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70194","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjh.70194","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Medical scams or grifting has long been a societal issue, though in recent years, the problem has become increasingly mainstream, especially as it relates to transfusion medicine, apheresis and biotherapies. Unfortunately, unsubstantiated medical claims, or unfounded interventions such as therapeutic plasma exchange for longevity or dangerous stem cell injections, are leading to significant medical waste and patient harm. Herein, we review contemporary medical grifts, cognitive biases and present a framework for managing these issues to ensure legitimate care and safety for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"207 6","pages":"2286-2295"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.70194","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145273174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management of relapsed multiple myeloma: A British Society of Haematology and UK Myeloma Society guideline 复发性多发性骨髓瘤的管理:英国血液病学会和英国骨髓瘤学会指南。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70149
Matthew Jenner, Kevin Boyd, Satarupa Choudhuri, Christopher Parrish, Mamta Garg, Simon Stern, the British Society of Haematology and UK Myeloma Society
<p>The objective of this guideline is to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the management of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have disease progression after at least one prior therapy. These guidelines and recommendations do not replace multidisciplinary discussion and the need to take account of clinical features, patient preference and the funding and reimbursement of treatments at any given point in time.</p><p>This guideline was compiled according to the British Society for Haematology (BSH) process at www.b-s-h.org.uk/guidelines. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) nomenclature was used to evaluate the levels of evidence and to assess the strength of recommendations. The GRADE criteria can be found at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org and are summarised in appendix 3 of the guidance document linked above.</p><p>Recommendations are based on a review of published literature, performed by Niche Science and Technology, using Medline, PubMed, Embase, Central and Web of Science searches from the beginning of 2000 up to June 2020. Further updates took place in December 2023 and 2024. Consideration was predominantly given to phase II and III clinical trials with early phase studies or case series only considered where there was a paucity of higher grade evidence. Conference abstracts were excluded.</p><p>The manuscript was reviewed by the UK Myeloma Society Executive Committee, the British Society for Haematology (BSH) Guidelines Committee Haemato-Oncology Task Force, the BSH Guidelines Committee, the Haemato-Oncology sounding board of BSH and the UK Charity Myeloma UK. It was also on the members section of the BSH website for comment. These organisations do not necessarily approve or endorse the contents.</p><p>This guideline aims to outline the optimal management of patients with relapsed and/or refractory myeloma. It includes recommendations about evaluation and monitoring of patients with relapsed disease and their subsequent treatment. There are many factors that influence choice of treatment at each line of therapy, and therefore, it is not possible or desirable to generate a single algorithm to guide treatment. However, these guidelines aim to reflect the most robust data available at the time of publication. These should complement multidisciplinary discussion, and patient-specific factors must always be taken into consideration. These guidelines focus on the United Kingdom, but include regimens that at the time of publication may not be reimbursed in all regions of the United Kingdom, even though robust evidence for their use exists.</p><p>The following sections aim to give an overview of the data available to guide treatment decisions given the increase in range of options for RMM. While many UK funding decisions are based on prior lines of therapy, we have not made reference to these except where the licence for that drug or combination of drugs is re
本指南的目的是为医疗保健专业人员提供明确的指导,指导复发和难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的管理,这些患者在至少一次治疗后出现疾病进展。这些指南和建议不能取代多学科讨论,也不能取代考虑临床特征、患者偏好以及任何特定时间点治疗的资金和报销的需要。本指南是根据英国血液学学会(BSH)的流程在www.b-s-h.org.uk/guidelines上编制的。建议分级评估、发展和评价(GRADE)术语用于评估证据水平和评估建议的强度。GRADE标准可在http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org上找到,并在上面链接的指导文件附录3中进行了总结。建议是基于对发表文献的回顾,由Niche Science and Technology使用Medline、PubMed、Embase、Central和Web of Science从2000年初到2020年6月进行搜索。进一步的更新发生在2023年和2024年12月。主要考虑II期和III期临床试验,早期研究或病例系列仅在缺乏更高级别证据的情况下考虑。会议摘要被排除在外。该手稿由英国骨髓瘤协会执行委员会、英国血液病协会(BSH)指南委员会血液肿瘤学工作组、BSH指南委员会、BSH血液肿瘤学宣传委员会和英国骨髓瘤慈善机构UK审查。博西家电网站的会员版块也刊登了相关评论。这些组织不一定认可或认可内容。本指南旨在概述复发和/或难治性骨髓瘤患者的最佳管理。它包括关于评估和监测复发疾病患者及其后续治疗的建议。在每条治疗线上,有许多因素影响治疗的选择,因此,不可能或不希望产生单一的算法来指导治疗。然而,这些指南旨在反映出版时可获得的最可靠的数据。这些应补充多学科的讨论,并且必须始终考虑到患者特定的因素。这些指南以联合王国为重点,但包括在出版时可能无法在联合王国所有地区报销的方案,即使存在可靠的使用证据。以下各节旨在概述现有数据,以指导RMM选择范围的增加的治疗决策。虽然许多英国的资助决定是基于先前的治疗,但我们没有参考这些,除非该药物或药物组合的许可仅限于给定的药物或先前的治疗历史。关键数据被制成表格,以总结每个试验的显著特征和关键结果。然而,不可能对每个试验进行全面的评论,重要的是要意识到试验纳入标准的差异,尤其是接受过的先前治疗,这在很大程度上受到招募患者的时间段的影响。在可能的情况下,在表中注明征聘期间。蛋白酶体抑制是mm患者的一种成熟的治疗策略。bortezomib是第一个蛋白酶体抑制剂,在mm患者中显示出单药活性。16基于观察到的与其他药物的协同作用,各种组合已经在2/3期试验中进行了评估。在RMM中,硼替佐米联合泊马度胺、17环磷酰胺、18蒽环类药物、19帕比诺他、20达伐单抗和sel无情已显示出疗效(见表1)。来自结合硼替佐米的一线方案的数据表明,每周一次的治疗方案与每周两次的治疗方案一样有效,并且与更少的神经病变相关。carfilzomib是第二代PI,可导致持续的蛋白酶体抑制,并已在临床试验中以一定剂量使用(见表2)。与硼替佐米和地塞米松相比,卡非佐米(56 mg/m2,每周2次)加地塞米松增加了PFS和OS,即使在硼替佐米难治性患者中也是如此,患者周围神经病变较少,但心血管并发症发生率较高。过度的水合作用可能导致体液超载和充血性心力衰竭31;因此,建议在第一个周期后明智地静脉输液,特别是对心脏受损、高血压或肾功能受损的患者。高血压应该小心控制每周一次的卡非佐米降低了心脏毒性,每周两次(27mg /m2)的疗效更好。33,34 A 56 mg/m2的剂量是最好的平衡功效和毒性。 卡非佐米与环磷酰胺和地塞米松联合使用的疗效评估显示,治疗三级难治性骨髓瘤的有效率为52%在MUK 5研究中,卡非佐米、环磷酰胺和地塞米松二线治疗比硼替佐米、环磷酰胺和地塞米松改善了总有效率,但没有PFS获益。然而,卡非佐米维持与不维持相比改善了PFS,支持在这种情况下使用该药卡非佐米(27mg /m2,每周2次)联合来那度胺+地塞米松也优于单独来那度胺+地塞米松。33-37 Carfilzomib也在随机3期试验中与其他药物(包括daratumumab和isatuximab)联合进行了研究(见表2、3和4)。Ixazomib是一种口服生物可利用的蛋白酶体抑制剂。与来那度胺和地塞米松联合使用,与单独使用这两种药物相比,它可以改善RR和PFS,包括高危细胞遗传学异常患者其他联合用药包括伊唑唑米、环磷酰胺和地塞米松60、61以及伊唑唑米、沙利度胺和地塞米松62表5总结了Ixasomib的研究。组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂(HDACi)是影响蛋白质转录的表观遗传调节剂。Vorinostat与硼替佐米联合使用的评估显示,没有临床意义的生存改善帕比诺司他联合硼替佐米在34.5%的硼替佐米难治性人群中显示出应答一项3期研究评估了在硼替佐米和地塞米松对硼替佐米不耐的患者中添加帕比诺他的效果。104,105 Panobinostat加深和改善PFS 6.1个月,但没有改善OS。尽管PFS较长,但panobinostat组的治疗时间较短,该组中34%的患者因不良事件而停止治疗,50%的患者需要减少硼替佐米或panobinostat的剂量。腹泻、疲劳、血小板减少和神经病变是常见的不良反应。另一项试验将这三种药物联合沙利度胺用于首次复发的患者,治疗耐受性较好副作用可能使这种联合治疗难以实施,特别是在多次复发的情况下,毒性需要仔细管理和明智地减少剂量。最近的一项大型随机2期试验比较了标准剂量的帕比司他和减毒的帕比司他方案,发现减毒降低了毒性,但以牺牲反应率为代价表8总结了重要的HDACi研究。烷基化剂如美法兰和环磷酰胺已用于治疗骨髓瘤超过50年,尽管在许多最近批准的方案中,已经讨论的新药物在很大程度上取代了烷基化剂。因此,一些患者接触烷基化剂和其他DNA损伤剂的机会相对有限。许多价格低廉,但没有执照,也没有受到NICE或其他健康技术评估审查的约束。涉及“新型”药剂骨架的烷基化剂组合在上面的相关章节中主要讨论。由于抗骨髓瘤治疗在过去20年中取得了重大进展,下面的表9-11仅总结了自2000年以来发表的研究,以确保与当前治疗途径的相关性。在复发性骨髓瘤中,自体干细胞移植(ASCT)有两种主要作用:一种是在首次反应时选择不进行预先自体干细胞移植(延迟ASCT)的患者,另一种是先前进行过ASCT的复发患者(第二次ASCT或ASCT2)。IFM2009试验对延迟ASCT进行了评估。所有患者均接受VRD诱导并接受自体干细胞采集,但随机分为VRD巩固组或ASCT组。两组患者均接受来那度胺维持治疗1年。ASCT组PFS为50个月,VRD组PFS为36个月;然而,4年的总生存率分别为81%和82%。VRD组的136/172例患者(79%)接受了补偿性ASCT。137该试验表明,在大多数患者中,在进展时延迟ASCT是可行的,并且不影响OS,尽管PFS较短值得考虑。第二次自体干细胞移植(ASCT2)在这里被定义为对先前在一线接受过ASCT的患者进行ASCT作为复发治疗的组成部分。它不包括串联ASCT。除两项随机研究外,大多数支持ASCT2的证据来自非随机单中心或多中心系列或注册数据的回顾性分析。在到下一次治疗的时间(TNT
{"title":"Management of relapsed multiple myeloma: A British Society of Haematology and UK Myeloma Society guideline","authors":"Matthew Jenner,&nbsp;Kevin Boyd,&nbsp;Satarupa Choudhuri,&nbsp;Christopher Parrish,&nbsp;Mamta Garg,&nbsp;Simon Stern,&nbsp;the British Society of Haematology and UK Myeloma Society","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70149","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjh.70149","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The objective of this guideline is to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the management of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have disease progression after at least one prior therapy. These guidelines and recommendations do not replace multidisciplinary discussion and the need to take account of clinical features, patient preference and the funding and reimbursement of treatments at any given point in time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This guideline was compiled according to the British Society for Haematology (BSH) process at www.b-s-h.org.uk/guidelines. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) nomenclature was used to evaluate the levels of evidence and to assess the strength of recommendations. The GRADE criteria can be found at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org and are summarised in appendix 3 of the guidance document linked above.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recommendations are based on a review of published literature, performed by Niche Science and Technology, using Medline, PubMed, Embase, Central and Web of Science searches from the beginning of 2000 up to June 2020. Further updates took place in December 2023 and 2024. Consideration was predominantly given to phase II and III clinical trials with early phase studies or case series only considered where there was a paucity of higher grade evidence. Conference abstracts were excluded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The manuscript was reviewed by the UK Myeloma Society Executive Committee, the British Society for Haematology (BSH) Guidelines Committee Haemato-Oncology Task Force, the BSH Guidelines Committee, the Haemato-Oncology sounding board of BSH and the UK Charity Myeloma UK. It was also on the members section of the BSH website for comment. These organisations do not necessarily approve or endorse the contents.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This guideline aims to outline the optimal management of patients with relapsed and/or refractory myeloma. It includes recommendations about evaluation and monitoring of patients with relapsed disease and their subsequent treatment. There are many factors that influence choice of treatment at each line of therapy, and therefore, it is not possible or desirable to generate a single algorithm to guide treatment. However, these guidelines aim to reflect the most robust data available at the time of publication. These should complement multidisciplinary discussion, and patient-specific factors must always be taken into consideration. These guidelines focus on the United Kingdom, but include regimens that at the time of publication may not be reimbursed in all regions of the United Kingdom, even though robust evidence for their use exists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The following sections aim to give an overview of the data available to guide treatment decisions given the increase in range of options for RMM. While many UK funding decisions are based on prior lines of therapy, we have not made reference to these except where the licence for that drug or combination of drugs is re","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"207 6","pages":"2322-2354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.70149","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145256897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative efficacy of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in multiple myeloma using a network meta-analysis 基于网络meta分析的抗cd38单克隆抗体治疗多发性骨髓瘤的比较疗效
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70199
Apoorva Doshi, Joao Tadeu Souto Filho, Alyssa Grimshaw, Smith Giri, Luciano J. Costa
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in multiple myeloma using a network meta-analysis","authors":"Apoorva Doshi,&nbsp;Joao Tadeu Souto Filho,&nbsp;Alyssa Grimshaw,&nbsp;Smith Giri,&nbsp;Luciano J. Costa","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70199","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjh.70199","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"207 6","pages":"2553-2557"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145256899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
2025 British Society for Haematology Guideline for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia 2025年英国血液学会慢性淋巴细胞白血病治疗指南。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70100
R. Walewska, T. A. Eyre, A. Bloor, G. Follows, S. Iyengar, R. Johnston, H. Marr, N. Martinez-Calle, A. McCaig, H. McCarthy, T. Munir, H. M. Parry, N. Parry-Jones, A. Pettitt, J. Riches, I. Ringshausen, A. Schuh, P. E. M. Patten
<p>These guidelines were prepared following the BSH process (https://b-s-h.org.uk/media/16732/bsh-guidance-development-process-dec-5-18.pdf). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) nomenclature was used to evaluate the levels of evidence and to assess the strength of recommendations. The GRADE criteria can be found at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org.</p><p>Recommendations are based on a review of the literature using Medline/PubMed. Search terms included are CLL treatment, randomised, clinical trial, FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab), <i>TP53</i> disruption, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, covalent, noncovalent inhibitors, BTK degraders, BCL2 inhibitor, rituximab, obinutuzumab, vaccination and COVID-19. The search was limited to English language publications and conference abstracts from the date of publication of the previous CLL guideline from 2021 to July 2025. Titles/abstracts obtained were curated and manually reviewed by the writing group who conducted additional searches using subsection heading terms.</p><p>Inclusion of such therapies does not imply endorsement for off-label use, but reflects their emerging role and clinical relevance in specific scenarios.</p><p>Review of the manuscript was performed by the BSH Guidelines Committee Haemato-Oncology Task Force, the BSH Guidelines Committee and the Haemato-Oncology sounding board of the BSH. It was also posted on the members section of the BSH website for comment. This guideline has also been reviewed by patient representatives from the UK CLL Support Association (https://www.cllsupport.org.uk).</p><p>The diagnostic work-up for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has not changed; please refer to the International Workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (iwCLL) guideline.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>Licensed treatments for CLL in 2025 include inhibitors of B-cell lymphoma-2, BCL2i (venetoclax), covalent inhibitors of Bruton tyrosine kinase, cBTKi (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib) used as monotherapy or in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (rituximab and, in first line only, obinutuzumab). Treatment regimens are either continuous (given until intolerance or progression) or fixed duration. These targeted agents have superseded chemoimmunotherapy, which is no longer recommended except where targeted agents are unavailable or contraindicated.</p><p>The International Workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (iwCLL) criteria for starting treatment<span><sup>1</sup></span> were established in the era of chemoimmunotherapy and, until recently, there were no data to support their use in the era of targeted therapy. To address this knowledge gap, the CLL12 trial compared ibrutinib monotherapy with placebo in patients with asymptomatic early-stage CLL at high risk of progression based on the German CLL Study Group score, with overall survival (OS) as the primary end-point. After a median follow-up of 69.3 months, ib
这些指南是根据BSH流程(https://b-s-h.org.uk/media/16732/bsh-guidance-development-process-dec-5-18.pdf)编写的。建议、评估、发展和评价的分级(GRADE)命名法用于评估证据水平和评估建议的强度。GRADE标准可以在http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org.Recommendations上找到,这些标准是基于Medline/PubMed的文献综述。搜索词包括CLL治疗、随机、临床试验、FCR(氟达拉宾、环磷酰胺、利妥昔单抗)、TP53破坏、布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂、共价、非共价抑制剂、BTK降解剂、BCL2抑制剂、利妥昔单抗、obinutuzumab、疫苗接种和COVID-19。检索仅限于从2021年至2025年7月前CLL指南出版日期的英文出版物和会议摘要。获得的标题/摘要由使用分段标题术语进行额外搜索的写作小组策划和手动审查。纳入这些疗法并不意味着认可说明书外使用,但反映了它们在特定情况下的新作用和临床相关性。BSH指南委员会血液肿瘤学工作组、BSH指南委员会和BSH的血液肿瘤学宣传委员会对手稿进行了审查。博西家电网站的会员版块也刊登了这篇文章,征求意见。英国慢性淋巴细胞白血病支持协会(https://www.cllsupport.org.uk).The)的患者代表也审查了该指南,慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的诊断检查没有改变;请参考国际慢性淋巴细胞白血病研讨会(iwCLL)指南。2025年获批的CLL治疗包括b细胞淋巴瘤-2抑制剂、BCL2i (venetoclax)、Bruton酪氨酸激酶共价抑制剂、cBTKi (ibrutinib、acalabrutinib和zanubrutinib),用于单药治疗或与抗cd20单克隆抗体(利妥昔单抗和一线仅使用的obinutuzumab)联合使用。治疗方案要么是连续的(给药直到不耐受或进展),要么是固定的疗程。这些靶向药物已经取代了化学免疫疗法,除非靶向药物不可用或有禁忌,否则不再推荐化学免疫疗法。慢性淋巴细胞白血病国际研讨会(iwCLL)的开始治疗标准1是在化学免疫治疗时代建立的,直到最近,还没有数据支持它们在靶向治疗时代的使用。为了解决这一知识差距,CLL12试验基于德国CLL研究组评分,以总生存期(OS)为主要终点,比较了伊鲁替尼单药治疗和安慰剂治疗无症状早期CLL高风险进展患者。中位随访69.3个月后,伊鲁替尼显示出比安慰剂显著的无进展生存(PFS)优势[HR 0.174 (95% CI 0.12-0.24)]。尽管如此,没有证据表明有OS获益,2伊鲁替尼组和安慰剂组的5年OS率分别为93.3%和93.6%。此外,由于已知伊鲁替尼的毒性,实验组的患者经历了更多的不良事件。因此,CLL12的结果证实,对于无症状的早期CLL患者,包括早期进展高风险的患者,积极监测/“观察和等待”/方法仍然是合适的。对许多患者来说,主动监测期可能会延长到需要治疗前的数年;因此,应该利用这段“等待时间”来优化总体健康状况。所有新诊断的患者应在可能的情况下进行康复治疗,并建议健康饮食,锻炼,增加身体活动和情绪健康,以及优化共存的医疗问题越来越多的证据表明,通过锻炼增加体力活动不仅可以改善身体机能,还可以改善焦虑、生活质量和症状负担。4-10国民保健服务(NHS, 19岁成人体育活动指南- NHS)和疾病控制和预防中心(CDC,老年人活动:概述(|体力活动基础|CDC)鼓励改善体力活动,包括每周至少150分钟中等强度或75分钟剧烈强度的体力活动(或两者混合),每周至少两次强化锻炼,以及改善平衡的活动,只要患者能够承担这些活动。化疗免疫疗法(CIT)与FCR已经成为无合并症的年轻患者的标准治疗方法,对于ighv突变(mIGHV) CLL患者亚组具有良好的长期预后,并且没有不良的细胞遗传学/分子特征,可以达到不可检测的可测量残余疾病(uMRD)状态。 在开始治疗之前很难识别这些患者,更重要的是,FCR与治疗相关的骨髓增生异常肿瘤/急性髓性白血病(MDS/AML)的发展风险虽小但显著(1.5%-3%)相关。13,14至关重要的是,三项随机对照试验(E1912、FLAIR和CLL13)的数据显示,与FCR相比,以伊鲁替尼或维托克拉西为基础的治疗的PFS更长,E1912和FLAIR也显示伊鲁替尼+利妥昔单抗的生存优势。虽然靶向药物并非没有毒性,但在决定使用哪种方案并采取适当的预防措施时,可以通过考虑相关的合并症来最大限度地减少不良事件。因此,当有其他治疗方案可用时,FCR不再适用。这同样适用于其他基于化疗的治疗(如利妥昔单抗+苯达莫司汀(BR)或obinutuzumab+氯苯bucil (CO)),其中随机对照试验(RCTs)显示与靶向药物相比明显的劣效性。18-20cBTKi和BCL2i(+/−单克隆抗cd20),无论是单独治疗还是联合治疗,在适合和不适合的患者中都一致显示出对抗CIT的优势(表1;图1)。虽然年龄和健康仍然是重要的概念,但将患者分为“适合”或“不适合”来进行治疗决策已不再合适。因此,我们根据给予固定时间/venetoclax为基础或持续BTKi治疗的意向,将一线治疗分开。考虑到TP53破坏患者的不同结果、研究设计和可用方案的差异,这类患者的结果数据被单独考虑。对于所有方案,给出了关键的结果数据,并在“选择最佳一线治疗”一节中给出了为什么一种方案可能优于另一种方案的额外考虑。对于未经治疗的CLL,大量已获批准的治疗方案为临床医生提供了从一系列高效方案中进行选择的挑战。需要考虑的重要因素是与CLL生物学、既往病史/合并症、伴随用药和患者选择相关的风险因素(图1,表1)。在初始治疗之前,所有患者应检测TP53破坏(通过突变分析和FISH检测del(17p))和IGHV突变状态,以指导治疗选择和告知预后。应邀请患者积极参与决策过程,如果患者愿意,也应邀请其护理人员参与(NG197,概述|共享决策|指南|NICE)。下面将讨论有关这些特征的数据,以便为决策提供信息;充分的讨论应包括任何相关调查的结果(例如基因组结果),任何适当的临床试验的可用性,每种方案在功效和毒性方面的潜在利弊以及患者的个人偏好。最后,值得注意的是,虽然随机对照试验已经确定了每种可用方案与CIT相比的疗效,但这些治疗方案之间的正面比较非常有限。不同研究的表观疗效差异可能反映了试验设计、患者群体、治疗持续时间和随访的差异,因此必须谨慎解释。TP53畸变的相关性已经讨论过了。在其他生物学预后因素中,IGHV状态对于非cit时代的CLL进展和结果仍然是最重要的。14,16,18,22,40 -42建议所有CLL患者在初始治疗前检测IGHV突变状态。由于IGHV突变状态在恶性转化时是固定的,不受治疗改变,所以不需要重复检测43,44。尽管大多数研究采用的亚组分析效力不足,但在固定时间治疗后,未突变的IGHV始终与早期疾病进展相关,但在持续治疗的情况下似乎影响较小。相比之下,在所有治疗方案中,大剂量肝炎患者都有长期持久的缓解,特别是那些接受固定时间V+O和V+I方案的患者。因此,尽管没有前瞻性研究表明接受
{"title":"2025 British Society for Haematology Guideline for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia","authors":"R. Walewska,&nbsp;T. A. Eyre,&nbsp;A. Bloor,&nbsp;G. Follows,&nbsp;S. Iyengar,&nbsp;R. Johnston,&nbsp;H. Marr,&nbsp;N. Martinez-Calle,&nbsp;A. McCaig,&nbsp;H. McCarthy,&nbsp;T. Munir,&nbsp;H. M. Parry,&nbsp;N. Parry-Jones,&nbsp;A. Pettitt,&nbsp;J. Riches,&nbsp;I. Ringshausen,&nbsp;A. Schuh,&nbsp;P. E. M. Patten","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70100","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjh.70100","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;These guidelines were prepared following the BSH process (https://b-s-h.org.uk/media/16732/bsh-guidance-development-process-dec-5-18.pdf). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) nomenclature was used to evaluate the levels of evidence and to assess the strength of recommendations. The GRADE criteria can be found at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recommendations are based on a review of the literature using Medline/PubMed. Search terms included are CLL treatment, randomised, clinical trial, FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab), &lt;i&gt;TP53&lt;/i&gt; disruption, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, covalent, noncovalent inhibitors, BTK degraders, BCL2 inhibitor, rituximab, obinutuzumab, vaccination and COVID-19. The search was limited to English language publications and conference abstracts from the date of publication of the previous CLL guideline from 2021 to July 2025. Titles/abstracts obtained were curated and manually reviewed by the writing group who conducted additional searches using subsection heading terms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Inclusion of such therapies does not imply endorsement for off-label use, but reflects their emerging role and clinical relevance in specific scenarios.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Review of the manuscript was performed by the BSH Guidelines Committee Haemato-Oncology Task Force, the BSH Guidelines Committee and the Haemato-Oncology sounding board of the BSH. It was also posted on the members section of the BSH website for comment. This guideline has also been reviewed by patient representatives from the UK CLL Support Association (https://www.cllsupport.org.uk).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The diagnostic work-up for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has not changed; please refer to the International Workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (iwCLL) guideline.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Licensed treatments for CLL in 2025 include inhibitors of B-cell lymphoma-2, BCL2i (venetoclax), covalent inhibitors of Bruton tyrosine kinase, cBTKi (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib) used as monotherapy or in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (rituximab and, in first line only, obinutuzumab). Treatment regimens are either continuous (given until intolerance or progression) or fixed duration. These targeted agents have superseded chemoimmunotherapy, which is no longer recommended except where targeted agents are unavailable or contraindicated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The International Workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (iwCLL) criteria for starting treatment&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; were established in the era of chemoimmunotherapy and, until recently, there were no data to support their use in the era of targeted therapy. To address this knowledge gap, the CLL12 trial compared ibrutinib monotherapy with placebo in patients with asymptomatic early-stage CLL at high risk of progression based on the German CLL Study Group score, with overall survival (OS) as the primary end-point. After a median follow-up of 69.3 months, ib","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"207 6","pages":"2296-2313"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.70100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145256932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peripheral blood profiling of azacitidine's hypomethylation: Advancing precision medicine in juvenile chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia 阿扎胞苷低甲基化的外周血分析:推进青少年慢性髓单细胞白血病的精准医学。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-09 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70205
Pasquale Niscola

Commentary on: Schönung et al. Assessment of peripheral blood DNA methylation signatures as pharmacodynamic and predictive biomarkers during azacytidine therapy in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: Results of the EWOG-MESRAT study. Br J Haematol 2025; 207:1271–1278.

评论:Schönung等。评估外周血DNA甲基化特征作为阿扎胞苷治疗青少年髓单核细胞白血病的药理学和预测性生物标志物:eogg - mesrat研究结果Br J Haematol 2025(已出版)。doi: 10.1111 / bjh.70046。
{"title":"Peripheral blood profiling of azacitidine's hypomethylation: Advancing precision medicine in juvenile chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia","authors":"Pasquale Niscola","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70205","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjh.70205","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Commentary on: Schönung et al. Assessment of peripheral blood DNA methylation signatures as pharmacodynamic and predictive biomarkers during azacytidine therapy in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: Results of the EWOG-MESRAT study. Br J Haematol 2025; 207:1271–1278.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"207 6","pages":"2661-2662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.70205","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145256925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Polatuzumab vedotin and CD79B: A study of efficacy in R-CHOP-resistant diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Polatuzumab vedotin和CD79B:对r - chop耐药弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的疗效研究
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70185
Nicolas Munz, Alberto J. Arribas, Roberta Bordone Pittau, Federico Simonetta, Georg Stussi, Francesco Bertoni
<p>The standard treatment for patients affected by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is still largely represented by the R-CHOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone).<span><sup>1</sup></span> Only up to two-thirds of treated patients are cured, indicating a too high fraction of patients still do not respond or relapse after a first R-CHOP treatment.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Patients with initial R-CHOP treatment failure have poor prognoses and outcomes.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Recent improvements in understanding DLBCL have led to a better refinement of disease classification and the development of new therapeutic strategies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). Two ADCs are now approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients across different countries: loncastuximab tesirine and polatuzumab vedotin.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Loncastuximab tesirine is an anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-cross-linking pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer warhead SG3199.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Polatuzumab vedotin is an anti-CD79B antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) as a payload.<span><sup>1, 3</sup></span> The optimal sequencing of therapies for the improved management of DLBCL patients is an active field of research. We recently identified seven DLBCL models with reduced sensitivity to R-CHOP (50 percent growth inhibitory concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>) values higher than the 75th percentile, i.e. 0.077 μg/mL).<span><sup>4</sup></span> Four cell lines (Pfeiffer, U2932, SU-DHL-16, SU-DHL-2) also showed reduced sensitivity to loncastuximab tesirine.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Thus, we exposed all the R-CHOP-resistant, alongside four R-CHOP-sensitive cell lines, to polatuzumab vedotin. In addition, we also treated REC1, a mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell line resistant to loncastuximab tesirine, its DNA-damaging SG3199 warhead and other ADCs.<span><sup>4-6</sup></span> All but two cell lines showed a dose–response sensitivity to polatuzumab vedotin, both derived from activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCL (Figure 1). One was the SU-DHL-2, resistant to R-CHOP and loncastuximab tesirine.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The other was the RCK8 with intermediate sensitivity to R-CHOP and loncastuximab tesirine-sensitive.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The remaining six R-CHOP-resistant cell lines, including three with low sensitivity to loncastuximab tesirine and the MCL cell line resistant to multiple ADCs, responded to polatuzumab vedotin. Figure S1 shows the Spearman correlation analysis between the anti-tumour activity of polatuzumab vedotin and the expression levels, measured via total ribonucleic acid (RNA)-Seq, of its target CD79B. In this small and selected cell line panel, we observed no significant correlation, although the two cell lines with low sensitivity to the ADC were a
弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的标准治疗仍主要以R-CHOP方案(利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和强的松)为代表只有多达三分之二的治疗患者治愈,这表明在第一次R-CHOP治疗后,仍然有过高比例的患者没有反应或复发最初R-CHOP治疗失败的患者预后和预后较差最近对DLBCL的了解有所改善,导致了疾病分类的更好改进和新的治疗策略的发展,包括嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞治疗、双特异性抗体和抗体-药物偶联物(adc)。两种adc现已被批准用于不同国家的复发/难治(R/R) DLBCL患者:loncastuximab tesirine和polatuzumab vedotin。1,2 Loncastuximab tesirine是一种结合脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)交联吡咯苯二氮卓(PBD)二聚体战斗部sg31992的抗cd19抗体。Polatuzumab vedotin是一种结合微管破坏单甲基auristatin E (MMAE)作为有效载荷的抗cd79b抗体。改善DLBCL患者管理的最佳治疗顺序是一个活跃的研究领域。我们最近发现了7种对R-CHOP敏感性降低的DLBCL模型(50%生长抑制浓度(IC50)值高于第75百分位数,即0.077 μg/mL)4个细胞系(Pfeiffer, U2932, SU-DHL-16, SU-DHL-2)对loncastuximab tesirine的敏感性也降低因此,我们将所有r - chop耐药细胞系以及4个r - chop敏感细胞系暴露于polatuzumab vedotin。此外,我们还治疗了REC1,这是一种对loncastuximab tesirine及其dna损伤SG3199弹头和其他adc耐药的套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)细胞系。4-6除两种细胞系外,所有细胞系均表现出对polatuzumab vedotin的剂量反应敏感性,均来源于活化的b细胞样(ABC) DLBCL(图1)。1种是SU-DHL-2,对R-CHOP和loncastuximab tesirine耐药RCK8对R-CHOP中等敏感,对loncastuximab tessiine敏感其余6个r - chop耐药细胞系,包括3个对loncastuximab tesirine低敏感性的细胞系和对多种adc耐药的MCL细胞系,对polatuzumab vedotin有反应。图S1显示了polatuzumab vedotin抗肿瘤活性与其靶标CD79B的总核糖核酸(RNA)-Seq测定的表达水平之间的Spearman相关分析。在这个小而选定的细胞系面板中,我们没有观察到显著的相关性,尽管对ADC敏感性低的两种细胞系也是CD79B表达最低的两种模型。先前的研究表明,SU-DHL-2和RCK8细胞系表现出低水平的CD79B表达,并且对基于polatuzumab的vedotin治疗具有抗性。相比之下,SU-DHL-4和U2932细胞系对polatuzumab vedotin表现出更高的敏感性我们的结果通过将分析扩展到另一组DLBCL细胞系来证实这些发现,从而加强了CD79B表达水平与治疗反应之间的关联。使用limma管道比较polatuzumab vedotin耐药(rk -8和SU-DHL-2)和敏感细胞系(所有其他DLBCL细胞系)的RNA seq数据显示,醛脱氢酶1家族成员L1 (ALDH1L1)是耐药细胞中第二大上调基因(log2倍变化= 11.06;调整p &lt; 0.001)(表S1)。在测试的细胞系中,我们观察到CD79B和ALDH1L1表达呈显著负相关(p = 0.0132; cor = - 0.72,图S2)。值得注意的是,在一组公开表达数据的DLBCL患者中,CD79B和ALDH1L1之间也存在负相关(p = 0.0221; cor = - 0.13,图S3)。这些发现表明,CD79B表达减少与ALDH1L1表达增加相关。先前的研究表明,ALDH1L1的失调可以破坏多种细胞代谢途径。9-11这种变化可能导致替代能量代谢的激活,如氧化磷酸化,由aldh1l介导的减少的烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸(NADH)产生三磷酸腺苷(ATP)。这种代谢转变可能有助于减少对B细胞受体(BCR)信号传导和CD79B表达的依赖性,从而降低对polatuzumab vedotin的敏感性。ALDH1L1抑制剂与polatuzumab vedotin联合可通过同时损害不同的代谢脆弱性来提供协同抗淋巴瘤活性。 由于ALDH1L1是双硫仑靶向的,10我们将双硫仑和polatuzumab vedotin联合应用于4种DLBCL细胞系,选择它们对ADC的不同程度敏感性:两种polatuzumab vedotin耐药(ABC DLBCL SU-DHL-2和RCK8)和两种polatuzumab vedotin敏感模型(ABC DLBCL RIVA和GCB DLBCL SU-DHL-16)。在所有测试的细胞系中,该组合确定了200-400 nM双硫仑对polatuzumab vedotin的加性细胞毒性作用,不限于ALDH1L1表达增加的polatuzumab vedotin耐药DLBCL细胞系(图S4)。双硫仑暴露并未增加SU-DHL-2或SU-DHL-16细胞中CD79B、CD19或CD20的表面表达(表S2)。ADC与双硫仑在所有测试细胞系中联合使用所观察到的益处可以用双硫仑的多方面作用机制来解释。研究表明,双硫仑可以诱导细胞内活性氧,促进细胞死亡,抑制蛋白酶体活性和活化B细胞的核因子κB轻链增强子(NF-κB)信号传导,从而可能调节细胞对adc的敏感性。此外,双硫仑可以抑制p97分离酶,导致蛋白质毒性应激在这种条件下,综合应激反应的激活支持微管介导的错误折叠蛋白转运到核周空间,在那里它们被组装成聚合体,随后在应激恢复过程中通过泛素-蛋白酶体系统降解因此,双硫仑诱导的蛋白质毒性应激与polatuzumab介导的微管破坏相结合,可能协同损害毒性蛋白聚集体的清除,从而放大凋亡细胞的死亡。这些发现强调了双硫仑作为一个有希望的联合伙伴,可以增强polatuzumab在多药耐药DLBCL中的活性,值得进一步研究。此外,ALDH1L1表达可能代表对polatuzumab反应的预测性生物标志物,可能与其他标志物(如ABCG2)联合使用,ABCG2是一种特性良好的atp结合盒转运蛋白,在polatuzumab耐药的DLBCL细胞系中被强烈上调。这些关联需要在未来的研究中得到证实。总之,我们的体外数据表明,靶向cd79b的polatuzumab vedotin在对R-CHOP和其他adc耐药的DLBCL模型中是一种活性药物。CD79B低表达的淋巴瘤可能从靶向CD19或通过不同的作用机制作用的药物中获益更多。我们的数据还强调了开发新的疗法和药物组合的重要性,这些疗法和药物组合可以克服某些淋巴瘤细胞抵抗化疗和多种adc的能力。NM进行实验和数据挖掘,解释数据并参与撰写论文。AJA解释数据并提供建议。RBP和GS进行流式细胞术分析。财政司提供意见。FB设计了这项研究,解释了数据,监督了这项研究,并共同撰写了论文。所有作者都审
{"title":"Polatuzumab vedotin and CD79B: A study of efficacy in R-CHOP-resistant diffuse large B-cell lymphoma","authors":"Nicolas Munz,&nbsp;Alberto J. Arribas,&nbsp;Roberta Bordone Pittau,&nbsp;Federico Simonetta,&nbsp;Georg Stussi,&nbsp;Francesco Bertoni","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70185","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjh.70185","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The standard treatment for patients affected by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is still largely represented by the R-CHOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone).&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Only up to two-thirds of treated patients are cured, indicating a too high fraction of patients still do not respond or relapse after a first R-CHOP treatment.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Patients with initial R-CHOP treatment failure have poor prognoses and outcomes.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Recent improvements in understanding DLBCL have led to a better refinement of disease classification and the development of new therapeutic strategies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). Two ADCs are now approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients across different countries: loncastuximab tesirine and polatuzumab vedotin.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1, 2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Loncastuximab tesirine is an anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-cross-linking pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer warhead SG3199.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Polatuzumab vedotin is an anti-CD79B antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) as a payload.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1, 3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The optimal sequencing of therapies for the improved management of DLBCL patients is an active field of research. We recently identified seven DLBCL models with reduced sensitivity to R-CHOP (50 percent growth inhibitory concentration (IC&lt;sub&gt;50&lt;/sub&gt;) values higher than the 75th percentile, i.e. 0.077 μg/mL).&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Four cell lines (Pfeiffer, U2932, SU-DHL-16, SU-DHL-2) also showed reduced sensitivity to loncastuximab tesirine.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Thus, we exposed all the R-CHOP-resistant, alongside four R-CHOP-sensitive cell lines, to polatuzumab vedotin. In addition, we also treated REC1, a mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell line resistant to loncastuximab tesirine, its DNA-damaging SG3199 warhead and other ADCs.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4-6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; All but two cell lines showed a dose–response sensitivity to polatuzumab vedotin, both derived from activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCL (Figure 1). One was the SU-DHL-2, resistant to R-CHOP and loncastuximab tesirine.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The other was the RCK8 with intermediate sensitivity to R-CHOP and loncastuximab tesirine-sensitive.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The remaining six R-CHOP-resistant cell lines, including three with low sensitivity to loncastuximab tesirine and the MCL cell line resistant to multiple ADCs, responded to polatuzumab vedotin. Figure S1 shows the Spearman correlation analysis between the anti-tumour activity of polatuzumab vedotin and the expression levels, measured via total ribonucleic acid (RNA)-Seq, of its target CD79B. In this small and selected cell line panel, we observed no significant correlation, although the two cell lines with low sensitivity to the ADC were a","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"207 6","pages":"2550-2552"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.70185","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145243282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency department utilization patterns in adults living with sickle cell disease. 成人镰状细胞病急诊科使用模式
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70190
Jean-Simon Rech, Aline Santin, François Lionnet, Sarah Mattioni, Evelyne Dubreucq Guerif, Olivier Steichen, Pierre Yves Boëlle

Most adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) attend the emergency department (ED), with significant interindividual and temporal variability. To identify the patterns of ED use, we analysed data from adults with SCD followed at a French reference centre who had ≥1 ED visit between 1 October 2013 and 31 December 2019. We used a survival model to estimate the cumulative risk of ED visits and its variability over time and applied clustering methods on these two dimensions to identify typical patterns of ED utilization. Among 656 adults (9080 ED visits), two clusters emerged: a low-use group with 529 individuals (81%) and 2924 ED visits (32%) and a high-use group with 127 individuals (19%) and 6156 ED visits (68%). All high-use group members experienced ED visits in bursts, defined as at least three visits within 3 months and at least three times more than during the previous 3 months. Bursts were uncommon in the low-use group (5% of individuals). Among individuals experiencing bursts, two ED visits less than a month apart increased the risk of another ED visit within the next month (adjusted HR 3.51 [95% CI 2.95-4.16]). Understanding factors triggering bursts of ED visits in adults with SCD may enable targeted interventions.

大多数成人镰状细胞病(SCD)参加急诊科(ED),具有显著的个体间和时间差异。为了确定ED使用模式,我们分析了2013年10月1日至2019年12月31日期间在法国参考中心随访的SCD成人患者的数据。我们使用生存模型来估计ED就诊的累积风险及其随时间的变化,并在这两个维度上应用聚类方法来确定ED使用的典型模式。在656名成年人(9080次ED就诊)中,出现了两个集群:低使用率组(529人)(81%)和2924次ED就诊(32%);高使用率组(127人)(19%)和6156次ED就诊(68%)。所有高使用率的小组成员都经历了突发ED就诊,定义为在3个月内至少3次就诊,并且至少比前3个月多3倍。发作在低使用率组(5%)不常见。在经历过发作的个体中,间隔不到一个月的两次急诊科就诊增加了下个月再次急诊科就诊的风险(调整后HR 3.51 [95% CI 2.95-4.16])。了解引发成人SCD患者急诊科就诊的因素可能有助于进行有针对性的干预。
{"title":"Emergency department utilization patterns in adults living with sickle cell disease.","authors":"Jean-Simon Rech, Aline Santin, François Lionnet, Sarah Mattioni, Evelyne Dubreucq Guerif, Olivier Steichen, Pierre Yves Boëlle","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) attend the emergency department (ED), with significant interindividual and temporal variability. To identify the patterns of ED use, we analysed data from adults with SCD followed at a French reference centre who had ≥1 ED visit between 1 October 2013 and 31 December 2019. We used a survival model to estimate the cumulative risk of ED visits and its variability over time and applied clustering methods on these two dimensions to identify typical patterns of ED utilization. Among 656 adults (9080 ED visits), two clusters emerged: a low-use group with 529 individuals (81%) and 2924 ED visits (32%) and a high-use group with 127 individuals (19%) and 6156 ED visits (68%). All high-use group members experienced ED visits in bursts, defined as at least three visits within 3 months and at least three times more than during the previous 3 months. Bursts were uncommon in the low-use group (5% of individuals). Among individuals experiencing bursts, two ED visits less than a month apart increased the risk of another ED visit within the next month (adjusted HR 3.51 [95% CI 2.95-4.16]). Understanding factors triggering bursts of ED visits in adults with SCD may enable targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145243323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Empirical and projected economic burden of chronic myeloid leukaemia in Sweden from 2015 to 2030: A population-based study 2015年至2030年瑞典慢性髓性白血病的经验和预测经济负担:一项基于人群的研究
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70193
Enoch Yi-Tung Chen, Paul W. Dickman, Fabrizio Di Mari, Torsten Dahlén, Leif Stenke, Magnus Björkholm, Mark S. Clements, Shuang Hao

Despite therapeutic advances and improved survival, the long-term economic burden of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) remains under-recognised given evolving treatment practices and fluctuating drug costs. We aimed to estimate and project total prevalence costs for CML in Sweden from a healthcare sector perspective, representing the direct healthcare expenditures for all patients living with CML, based on real-world drug and procedure prices. We used data from the Swedish Cancer Register and the Swedish CML register to estimate and project prevalence and costs. The estimated numbers of prevalent cases were 1808 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1604–2011) in 2025 and 2120 (95% CI, 1916–2325) in 2030, driven by stable incidence and improved survival. Despite increasing prevalence, the annual total direct healthcare costs for all prevalent CML patients in Sweden decreased from USD 40.04 million (95% CI, 33.70–46.40) in 2015 to USD 26.04 million (95% CI, 23.13–28.97) in 2025, then projected to slightly increase to USD 30.67 million (95% CI, 27.70–33.64) in 2030. While CML prevalence proportions are expected to increase, declining treatment costs may mitigate the burden on the Swedish healthcare system. These population-based projections can inform long-term planning and pricing strategies for CML care.

尽管治疗取得了进步,生存率也有所提高,但鉴于治疗方法的不断发展和药物成本的波动,慢性髓性白血病(CML)的长期经济负担仍未得到充分认识。我们旨在从医疗保健部门的角度估计和预测瑞典CML的总流行成本,代表所有CML患者的直接医疗支出,基于现实世界的药物和手术价格。我们使用来自瑞典癌症登记处和瑞典CML登记处的数据来估计和规划患病率和成本。在发病率稳定和生存率提高的推动下,预计2025年流行病例数为1808例(95%置信区间[CI], 1604-2011), 2030年为2120例(95% CI, 1916-2325)。尽管患病率不断上升,但瑞典所有CML患者的年度直接总医疗费用从2015年的4004万美元(95% CI, 33.70-46.40)下降到2025年的2604万美元(95% CI, 23.13-28.97),然后预计到2030年将小幅增加到3067万美元(95% CI, 27.70-33.64)。虽然CML患病率比例预计会增加,但治疗费用的下降可能会减轻瑞典医疗保健系统的负担。这些基于人口的预测可以为CML护理的长期规划和定价策略提供信息。
{"title":"Empirical and projected economic burden of chronic myeloid leukaemia in Sweden from 2015 to 2030: A population-based study","authors":"Enoch Yi-Tung Chen,&nbsp;Paul W. Dickman,&nbsp;Fabrizio Di Mari,&nbsp;Torsten Dahlén,&nbsp;Leif Stenke,&nbsp;Magnus Björkholm,&nbsp;Mark S. Clements,&nbsp;Shuang Hao","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70193","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjh.70193","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite therapeutic advances and improved survival, the long-term economic burden of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) remains under-recognised given evolving treatment practices and fluctuating drug costs. We aimed to estimate and project total prevalence costs for CML in Sweden from a healthcare sector perspective, representing the direct healthcare expenditures for all patients living with CML, based on real-world drug and procedure prices. We used data from the Swedish Cancer Register and the Swedish CML register to estimate and project prevalence and costs. The estimated numbers of prevalent cases were 1808 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1604–2011) in 2025 and 2120 (95% CI, 1916–2325) in 2030, driven by stable incidence and improved survival. Despite increasing prevalence, the annual total direct healthcare costs for all prevalent CML patients in Sweden decreased from USD 40.04 million (95% CI, 33.70–46.40) in 2015 to USD 26.04 million (95% CI, 23.13–28.97) in 2025, then projected to slightly increase to USD 30.67 million (95% CI, 27.70–33.64) in 2030. While CML prevalence proportions are expected to increase, declining treatment costs may mitigate the burden on the Swedish healthcare system. These population-based projections can inform long-term planning and pricing strategies for CML care.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"207 6","pages":"2441-2450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.70193","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145243330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical and haematological features of hyperhaemolysis in sickle cell disease: A case series from two tertiary care centres 镰状细胞病高溶血的临床和血液学特征:来自两个三级保健中心的病例系列。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70191
Jaehyup Kim, James D. Burner, Christopher Webb, Ravi Sarode, Brian D. Adkins, Margaret Kypreos, Ibrahim F. Ibrahim, Yu-Min Shen, Sean G. Yates
<p>To the Editor,</p><p>Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD; including sickle cell anemia [HbSS] and related genotypes such as HbSC and HbSβ-thalassemia) frequently require chronic RBC transfusions and are at high risk of delayed haemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTR). Although partial antigen matching has become standard practice to reduce alloimmunization rates in SCD patients, DHTR remains common due to several factors, including genotypic differences in RBCs between donor blood and recipients.<span><sup>1-4</sup></span> DHTR risk in SCD patients is reported to range from 1% to 19%,<span><sup>5</sup></span> significantly higher than that of the general population, which is estimated to range from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 10 000.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span></p><p>A subset of SCD patients develops an exaggerated DHTR response known as hyperhaemolysis syndrome (HHS). This condition is thought to be caused by immune-mediated haemolysis of both bystander autologous red blood cells (RBCs)<span><sup>8</sup></span> and allogeneic transfused RBCs.<span><sup>9</sup></span> Here, we describe the clinical and haematological characteristics of 10 SCD patients diagnosed with HHS at our institution. Additionally, we assess how interventions, including targeted monoclonal antibody therapies, affect outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-centre case series of HHS in SCD reported to date.</p><p>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Clements University Hospital and Parkland Memorial Hospital, both tertiary care hospitals, in Dallas, Texas, from 2020 to 2025. The study was approved by the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center institutional review board (STU-2020-0068). Hyperhaemolysis was defined as a decline in haemoglobin (Hb) values below pre-transfusion levels following the transfusion of red blood cells, accompanied by laboratory markers consistent with haemolysis (e.g. lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], bilirubin). Demographic data (age, gender, type of haemoglobinopathy and blood type), laboratory findings (Hb, % hemoglobin A (HbA), direct antiglobulin test [DAT], LDH, total bilirubin, haemoglobinuria and reticulocyte count) and clinical information (admission diagnosis, infection, treatment regimen) were collected through a retrospective chart review. The ratio of Hb was evaluated by two-tailed Student's <i>t</i>-test using GraphPad Software (GraphPad, Boston, MA, USA). No imputation was performed for missing data, and statistical significance was defined as a <i>p</i>-value less than 0.05.</p><p>We identified a total of 10 patients diagnosed with HHS during the study period and described clinical features in Table 1, and laboratory characteristics in Table S1 for each patient. Table S2 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the study cohort. Immunohaematology findings varied, with two patients having a positive DAT. Patient 2 displayed pre- and post-transfusion DAT positi
镰状细胞病(SCD,包括镰状细胞性贫血[HbSS]和相关基因型,如HbSC和hbs β-地中海贫血)患者经常需要慢性红细胞输血,并且延迟溶血性输血反应(DHTR)的风险很高。尽管部分抗原配型已成为降低SCD患者同种异体免疫率的标准做法,但由于几个因素,包括供体血液和受体血液中红细胞的基因型差异,DHTR仍然很常见。据报道,SCD患者的DHTR风险范围为1%至19%,5显著高于一般人群(估计范围为1000分之一至10000分之一),7 SCD患者的一个亚群出现夸张的DHTR反应,称为高溶血综合征(HHS)。这种情况被认为是由旁观者自体红细胞(rbc)8和异体输血红细胞的免疫介导溶血引起的在这里,我们描述了10例SCD患者诊断为HHS的临床和血液学特征。此外,我们评估干预措施,包括靶向单克隆抗体治疗,如何影响结果。据我们所知,这是迄今为止在SCD报告的最大的单中心HHS系列病例。这项回顾性队列研究于2020年至2025年在德克萨斯州达拉斯市的德克萨斯大学西南医学中心克莱门茨大学医院和帕克兰纪念医院这两家三级保健医院进行。该研究得到了德克萨斯大学西南医学中心机构审查委员会(STU-2020-0068)的批准。高溶血被定义为输血后血红蛋白(Hb)值低于输血前水平,伴有与溶血一致的实验室标志物(如乳酸脱氢酶[LDH],胆红素)。通过回顾性图表回顾收集患者的人口统计学资料(年龄、性别、血红蛋白病类型和血型)、实验室检查结果(Hb、血红蛋白A % (HbA)、直接抗球蛋白试验[DAT]、LDH、总胆红素、血红蛋白尿和网状红细胞计数)和临床资料(入院诊断、感染、治疗方案)。采用GraphPad软件(GraphPad, Boston, MA, USA),采用双尾学生t检验评估Hb的比例。未对缺失数据进行补全,p值小于0.05为统计学显著性。我们在研究期间共确定了10例诊断为HHS的患者,并在表1中描述了每位患者的临床特征,在表S1中描述了每位患者的实验室特征。表S2总结了研究队列的临床特征。免疫血液学结果各不相同,2例患者DAT阳性。患者2为输血前和输血后DAT阳性(多特异性和免疫球蛋白G (IgG)),洗脱液为阴性,而患者7为输血前和输血后DAT阳性(多特异性和IgG),温自身抗体洗脱液为阳性。3例患者(1、6和7)既往和当前抗体筛查均为阳性,高溶血后未产生新抗体。患者8在分娩过程中输血10单位红细胞前有抗e、抗fya和抗jkb抗体,随后出现抗c、抗k、抗s和温热自身抗体等抗体。高溶血诊断后的中位停留时间为9天(四分位数间距(IQR) 6-11)。两例患者(患者4和患者6)在治疗后死亡,在年龄、性别、从输血到高溶血的时间、抗体的存在、红细胞输血类型或住院时间方面无显著差异。有报告表明,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染或疫苗接种与溶血并发症恶化之间存在关联。3例患者在高溶血1个月内确诊为SARS-CoV-2感染或免疫接种。患者1在输血前3周接种了疫苗,而患者4和患者9在输血后1周内检测出SARS-CoV-2阳性。未观察到感染或接种疫苗与存活之间的关联。表2总结了前10天的Hb水平和Hb比值(Hb值除以前一天的Hb值)。高溶血诊断时的Hb水平在幸存者和非幸存者之间似乎没有显着差异(中位数5.8 vs 5.3 g/dL)。然而,前3天的Hb比值在生存组和非生存组之间差异有统计学意义(0.94±0.16比0.73±0.15,p = 0.03)。对于该病例系列,Hb比值≤0.8或每日Hb绝对下降≥1.5 g/dL识别非幸存者的敏感性为100%,特异性为75%,约登指数为0.75。 4例患者(患者1、4、6和10)经历了Hb快速下降,定义为Hb比值为0.8或绝对每日Hb下降≥1.5 g/dL(表2中粗体)。患者1在Hb快速下降当天开始使用达贝泊汀和埃曲单抗,随后恢复。患者4在Hb快速下降当天开始Eculizumab治疗,但患者持续出现Hb下降并死亡。患者6在Hb快速下降当天仅接受类固醇和静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)。患者10在Hb快速下降当天开始接受达贝泊汀治疗,并从高溶血中恢复,尽管临床过程中因脂肪栓塞引起的栓塞性脑卒中而复杂化。单个患者的Hb和LDH趋势,以及所使用的治疗方法,总结在图S1中。一些研究报道了针对免疫途径的单克隆抗体在严重或顽固性高溶血病例中的疗效,并可作为有用的辅助治疗。12,13然而,何时考虑这些二线治疗的标准并不存在。该研究比较了幸存者和非幸存者之间的实验室和临床数据,发现Hb早期快速下降是预后不良的潜在标志,这可以帮助识别高危患者,这些患者可能受益于早期给予高溶血二线治疗,包括促红细胞生成素模拟剂和单克隆抗体治疗。使用羟脲(羟基脲)和克里赞单抗等疾病调节剂进行预处理,或使用利妥昔单抗、eculizumab或托珠单抗等HHS治疗,与生存率没有明确的关联。其中3名患者在输血后1个月内感染了SARS-CoV-2或接种了疫苗,患者4的住院过程先前在已发表的病例报告中有描述在接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗后,SARS-CoV-2在加速红细胞循环14或增加促炎细胞因子分泌15中的潜在作用提出了SARS-CoV-2可能作为高溶血发作的触发因素的可能性。然而,目前尚不清楚高溶血患者与普通人群之间的SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种或感染率是否存在差异。进一步研究SARS-CoV-2作为高溶血发作触发因素的作用可能是值得的。虽然该病例系列是关注高溶血的较大病例系列之一,由10例患者组成,但患者数量可能不足以确定高危患者的绝对Hb下降或Hb比率。我们还注意到患者之间临床管理的显著差异,这使治疗方案效果的分析变得复杂。涉及多个机构的更大患者群体的进一步研究可以更准确地完善所提出的阈值,从而实现有针对性的早期使用二线治疗。没有资金报告。Jaehyup Kim负责研究的概念化、研究设计、数据收集、数据分析和论文撰写。詹姆斯·d·伯纳负责撰写手稿。克里斯托弗·韦伯(Christopher Webb)负责数据收集和手稿撰写。Ravi Sarode负责手稿的撰写。布莱恩·d·阿德金斯(Brian D. Adkins)负责撰写手稿。Margaret Kypreos负责手稿的撰写。易卜拉欣·f·易卜拉欣负责手稿写作。手稿由沈玉民负责撰写。Sean G. Yates负责研究的概念化、研究设计、数据收集、数据分析和手稿撰写。作者没有需要披露的利益冲突。数据可应要求提供。
{"title":"Clinical and haematological features of hyperhaemolysis in sickle cell disease: A case series from two tertiary care centres","authors":"Jaehyup Kim,&nbsp;James D. Burner,&nbsp;Christopher Webb,&nbsp;Ravi Sarode,&nbsp;Brian D. Adkins,&nbsp;Margaret Kypreos,&nbsp;Ibrahim F. Ibrahim,&nbsp;Yu-Min Shen,&nbsp;Sean G. Yates","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70191","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjh.70191","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;To the Editor,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD; including sickle cell anemia [HbSS] and related genotypes such as HbSC and HbSβ-thalassemia) frequently require chronic RBC transfusions and are at high risk of delayed haemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTR). Although partial antigen matching has become standard practice to reduce alloimmunization rates in SCD patients, DHTR remains common due to several factors, including genotypic differences in RBCs between donor blood and recipients.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1-4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; DHTR risk in SCD patients is reported to range from 1% to 19%,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; significantly higher than that of the general population, which is estimated to range from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 10 000.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6, 7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A subset of SCD patients develops an exaggerated DHTR response known as hyperhaemolysis syndrome (HHS). This condition is thought to be caused by immune-mediated haemolysis of both bystander autologous red blood cells (RBCs)&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and allogeneic transfused RBCs.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Here, we describe the clinical and haematological characteristics of 10 SCD patients diagnosed with HHS at our institution. Additionally, we assess how interventions, including targeted monoclonal antibody therapies, affect outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-centre case series of HHS in SCD reported to date.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Clements University Hospital and Parkland Memorial Hospital, both tertiary care hospitals, in Dallas, Texas, from 2020 to 2025. The study was approved by the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center institutional review board (STU-2020-0068). Hyperhaemolysis was defined as a decline in haemoglobin (Hb) values below pre-transfusion levels following the transfusion of red blood cells, accompanied by laboratory markers consistent with haemolysis (e.g. lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], bilirubin). Demographic data (age, gender, type of haemoglobinopathy and blood type), laboratory findings (Hb, % hemoglobin A (HbA), direct antiglobulin test [DAT], LDH, total bilirubin, haemoglobinuria and reticulocyte count) and clinical information (admission diagnosis, infection, treatment regimen) were collected through a retrospective chart review. The ratio of Hb was evaluated by two-tailed Student's &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt;-test using GraphPad Software (GraphPad, Boston, MA, USA). No imputation was performed for missing data, and statistical significance was defined as a &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;-value less than 0.05.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We identified a total of 10 patients diagnosed with HHS during the study period and described clinical features in Table 1, and laboratory characteristics in Table S1 for each patient. Table S2 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the study cohort. Immunohaematology findings varied, with two patients having a positive DAT. Patient 2 displayed pre- and post-transfusion DAT positi","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"207 6","pages":"2643-2647"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.70191","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145231213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A disulfidptosis-related gene signature predicts prognosis and immune-metabolic landscape in multiple myeloma 多发性骨髓瘤的二硫解相关基因特征预测预后和免疫代谢景观。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.70189
Li Wang, Jinjin Wang, Yutong Wang, Ting Niu, Ailin Zhao

Disulfidptosis is a newly recognized cell death induced by disulphide stress under glucose deprivation. However, its clinical implications in multiple myeloma (MM) remain largely unexplored. We identified disulfidptosis-related genes via co-expression analysis and developed a risk signature through univariate Cox, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The model was internally and externally validated for overall survival prediction. Downstream analyses included functional enrichment, tumour mutation burden (TMB), tumour microenvironment (TME) characterization and immune-metabolic profiling. Preliminary in vitro validation was conducted with PLEC-knockout KMS-11 cells under glucose deprivation. A nine-gene signature was established and validated, showing robust prognostic performance across cohorts. High-risk patients displayed proliferative profiles, higher TMB, an immunosuppressive TME with neutrophils, eosinophils and exhausted T cells and activation of glycolysis and cystine/glutathione metabolism. This signature defines an aggressive MM subtype likely unresponsive to immune checkpoint therapy. Functional assays confirmed that PLEC mediates actin disulphide cross-linking during metabolic stress. We present a novel disulfidptosis-related gene signature with independent prognostic value in MM, offering insights into the molecular and immune landscape of MM and serving as a useful tool for risk stratification and therapeutic suggestion.

二硫下垂是一种新发现的由葡萄糖剥夺下的二硫应激引起的细胞死亡。然而,其在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中的临床意义在很大程度上仍未被探索。我们通过共表达分析确定了二硫塌陷相关基因,并通过单变量Cox、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归和多变量Cox回归分析建立了风险特征。该模型进行了内部和外部的总体生存预测验证。下游分析包括功能富集、肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)、肿瘤微环境(TME)表征和免疫代谢谱。在葡萄糖剥夺条件下,用plec敲除KMS-11细胞进行了初步的体外验证。建立并验证了9个基因的特征,显示了跨队列的可靠预后表现。高危患者表现为增生性、TMB升高、TME伴中性粒细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞和耗竭T细胞的免疫抑制、糖酵解和胱氨酸/谷胱甘肽代谢激活。这个特征定义了一种侵袭性MM亚型,可能对免疫检查点治疗无反应。功能分析证实PLEC在代谢应激过程中介导肌动蛋白二硫交联。我们提出了一种新的与多发性骨髓瘤相关的基因特征,具有独立的预后价值,为多发性骨髓瘤的分子和免疫景观提供了见解,并可作为风险分层和治疗建议的有用工具。
{"title":"A disulfidptosis-related gene signature predicts prognosis and immune-metabolic landscape in multiple myeloma","authors":"Li Wang,&nbsp;Jinjin Wang,&nbsp;Yutong Wang,&nbsp;Ting Niu,&nbsp;Ailin Zhao","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70189","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjh.70189","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Disulfidptosis is a newly recognized cell death induced by disulphide stress under glucose deprivation. However, its clinical implications in multiple myeloma (MM) remain largely unexplored. We identified disulfidptosis-related genes via co-expression analysis and developed a risk signature through univariate Cox, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The model was internally and externally validated for overall survival prediction. Downstream analyses included functional enrichment, tumour mutation burden (TMB), tumour microenvironment (TME) characterization and immune-metabolic profiling. Preliminary in vitro validation was conducted with <i>PLEC</i>-knockout KMS-11 cells under glucose deprivation. A nine-gene signature was established and validated, showing robust prognostic performance across cohorts. High-risk patients displayed proliferative profiles, higher TMB, an immunosuppressive TME with neutrophils, eosinophils and exhausted T cells and activation of glycolysis and cystine/glutathione metabolism. This signature defines an aggressive MM subtype likely unresponsive to immune checkpoint therapy. Functional assays confirmed that PLEC mediates actin disulphide cross-linking during metabolic stress. We present a novel disulfidptosis-related gene signature with independent prognostic value in MM, offering insights into the molecular and immune landscape of MM and serving as a useful tool for risk stratification and therapeutic suggestion.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":"207 6","pages":"2391-2403"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.70189","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145237536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
British Journal of Haematology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1